Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
30 2:10 PM 285
(Journal of the Society of Materials Science, Japan), Vol. 59, No. 4, pp. 285-290, Apr. 2010
For the purpose of obtaining shear modulus, axial, transverse and 45 degree off-axis compression test for wood
specimen were performed to measure Youngs modulus and Poissons ratio. Strain was measured using a strain
gauge and an extensometer, and deformation of specimens was observed using a digital image correlation (DIC)
technique. The precision of the test was determined by the finite element method. The following conclusions were
made. The nominal Youngs modulus obtained from the distance between compression jigs was estimated to be
smaller than that obtained using the strain gauge and extensometer. This was because large compression deformations occurred in the local area in contact with the jigs. The Poissons ratio obtained for the off-axis specimen was
negative. The Poissons ratio obtained by Cauchys transformation rule and the finite element method using mechanical properties cited in literature was also negative. Off-axis specimens were observed to undergo arc-shaped or S-shaped
deformation by compression. Constraint on the jigs probably affected the deformation and resulted in the generation
of improper shear stress in the specimen. This constraint was thought to be related to the compliance component C 16
of Cauchys transformation. The component of the cited properties has the maximum value under an off-axis compression of
approximately 45, and the value of the component under an off-axis compression of 15 is 22~69% of the maximum
value. We propose that the optimum off-axis angle for obtaining the desired shear modulus probably is approximately
15 for the cited three species.
Key words : Wood specimen, shear modulus, Youngs modulus, negative Poissons ratio, 45 off-axis
compression
1), 2)
3)
2
21
(Chamaecyparis obtuse)
4)
Iosipescu
18 (60mm)
5), 6)
6 6
7)
8)
3
Iospescu
JIS
45 6
9)
10.0GPa
286
12.3 8.0
MSC Nastran 4
14%
(L)
Fig. 1
7200
5mm
45 45
RT
Nastran
22
100kN
5mm
0.2mm
10mm
3 6kN
29.5mmFig. 1
1cm 2
1 2
3
31
D100 1
LA-150TX
6 Table 2
3000pixels 2008pixels0.0465mm/pixel
Ea Ee
Eg
Ea
23
30% 80% Ee Eg
45
45
10),
(Table 1) 2
0.5mm 0.5mm
11)
Fig. 1 Edge grain specimens and experimental setup for compression test.
Table 1 Mechanical properties for finite element analysis.
287
LR 3 29.8MPa
Fig. 3
1mm
5%
0.35%
1mm 5%
0.35% 0.5% ((5 2mm +
0.35 58mm) 60mm)
Fig. 3
45
45 Fig. 4
3
0.6mm Fig. 4
32
7.2MPa
45
Fig. 2
20
0.45mm Fig. 2
33
LT45 Fig. 5
2 3
3 0.6mm
288
(B)
(Fig. 5-B)
Fig. 4
Fig. 5-B, C
12)
45
(1) (2)
Table 1
(Fig. 5-A)
Table 3
(Fig. 5-B)
1cm 2
1cm
(Fig. 5-C)LR45
(3)
E
Ex
Ey
Ex
G xy
Fig. 5 Deformations simulated by finite element analysis ; U : image of undeformed specimen, A : unconstrained
loading point, B : loading point constrained in the horizontal direction, C : loading point constrained at the
horizontal direction and then rotation, where displacements are enlarged to some extent.
Table 3 Youngs modulus and Poissons ratio obtained by transform equation (T) and finite element analysis (A, B, C).
289
xy
1
1 1 tan 2 + (1 + tan 4 )
Ex
G xy E x E y
=
xy
1 + 1 tan 4 + 1
tan 2
Ex Ey
Ex
G xy
XY
Y Y 1 Y Y 2
=
X X 1 X X 2
(4)
(2)
(3)
G xy =
E45
2 (1 + 45 )
(4)
x - y X-Y
E X-Y EX,
Table 1 (2)
XY
(Fig. 6) 45
1cm 2 X 1 X 2
0.18 30
XX1XX2 2 Y1Y2
0.24
YY1YY2 (2)
45
( 45) LT
LR LT
( ) (5)
(A)
(y = 0, xy = 0)
C16 (6)
C16
13)
Fig. 7 55 45
14)
Table 2
(C)
Off-
axis 15
Iosipescu
15)
15
Off-axis
Fig. 7 C16 45
30% Table 1
15)
45
11)
(4)
Table 3 (E45)
( 45) Table 4
LR45
B C 9% +9%
LT45 +6%+25%
45
Table 4 Shear modulus (MPa) obtained by transform
equation (T) and finite element analysis (B, C).
290
15
(E15)
(15)
(5)
sin 3
cos
sin
cos
+ 2 cos sin +
(6)
Ey
G xy
(x - y) (x - y)
(X-Y)
X C11
Y = C12
XY C16
C12
C22
C26
C16 X
C26 Y
C66 XY
(7)
(1)
(2)
45
(3)
45 S
(4)
45
15
20
( S )
19106010