Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 2

55258 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No.

183 / Thursday, September 21, 2006 / Notices

electronically executed Linkage Orders 19(b)(2) of the Act.13 The Exchange filed available for inspection and copying at
also will be charged $0.50 per contract. Amendment No. 4 to reconcile the the principal offices of the Exchange.
The Exchange acknowledges that the proposed rules in the original filing, as All comments received will be posted
Exchange’s previous version of its amended, with the Exchange’s current without change; the Commission does
Schedule did not reflect that the BD rules, which reflect an immediately not edit personal identifying
Surcharge was imposed on effective proposed rule change filed information from submissions. You
electronically executed Linkage after this proposed rule change was should submit only information that
Orders.10 In Amendment No. 4, the published for comment.14 The you wish to make available publicly. All
Exchange proposes to modify the Commission believes that in submissions should refer to Amendment
Schedule to make clear that the BD Amendment No. 4, the Exchange No. 4 to SR–NYSEArca–2006–20 and
Surcharge will be included as a proposes no significant changes to the should be submitted on or before
component of the $0.50 fee assessed for fees proposed in the original filing. October 12, 2006.
electronically executed Linkage Orders. Therefore, the Commission finds good
V. Conclusion
III. Discussion and Commission cause exists to accelerate approval of
Findings Amendment No. 4, pursuant to Section It is therefore ordered, pursuant to
19(b)(2) of the Act.15 Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,16 that
The Commission has reviewed
IV. Solicitation of Comments Amendment No. 4 to the proposed rule
carefully the proposed rule change, as
change (SR–NYSEArca–2006–20) be,
amended, and finds that it is consistent Interested persons are invited to and hereby is, approved on an
with the requirements of the Act and the submit written data, views, and
rules and regulations thereunder accelerated basis.
arguments concerning Amendment No.
applicable to a national securities For the Commission, by the Division of
4, including whether Amendment No. 4
exchange.11 In particular, the Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated
is consistent with the Act. Comments authority.17
Commission believes that the proposal may be submitted by any of the
is consistent with Section 6(b)(4) of the J. Lynn Taylor,
following methods:
Act,12 which requires that the rules of Assistant Secretary.
an exchange provide an equitable Electronic Comments [FR Doc. 06–7842 Filed 9–20–06; 8:45 am]
allocation of reasonable dues, fees and • Use the Commission’s Internet BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
other charges among its members and comment form (http://www.sec.gov/
other persons using its facilities. Under rules/sro.shtml); or
the current NYSE Arca Schedule, • Send an e-mail to rule- SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
manually executed BD orders are comments@sec.gov. Please include File COMMISSION
charged $0.26 per contract and Number SR–NYSEArca–2006–20 on the
electronically executed orders from subject line. [Release No. 34–54448; File No. SR–OCC–
broker-dealers are charged $0.50 per 2006–07]
contract. The Exchange proposed that Paper Comments
manually executed Linkage Orders be • Send paper comments in triplicate Self-Regulatory Organizations; The
charged $0.26 per contract and to Nancy M. Morris, Secretary, Options Clearing Corporation; Order
electronically executed Linkage Orders Securities and Exchange Commission, Approving Proposed Rule Change
be charged $0.50 per contract. Station Place, 100 F Street, NE., Relating to a Surcharge for Non-
Accordingly, the Commission believes Washington, DC 20549–1090. Clearing Member Subscribers That
that the Exchange’s proposed Schedule All submissions should refer to Have Not Met a Mandated Conversion
clearly sets forth the fees imposed on Amendment No. 4 to SR–NYSEArca– Date for Its Data Distribution Service
Linkage Orders. 2006–20. This file number should be
As discussed above, the Exchange September 14, 2006.
included on the subject line if e-mail is
acknowledges, in Amendment No. 4, used. To help the Commission process I. Introduction
that prior versions of its Schedule did and review your comments more
not represent that the $0.25 BD efficiently, please use only one method. On May 15, 2006, The Options
Surcharge was applied to electronically The Commission will post all comments Clearing Corporation (‘‘OCC’’) filed with
executed Linkage Orders. Because the on the Commission’s Internet Web site the Securities and Exchange
Exchange assessed the BD Surcharge on (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Commission (‘‘Commission’’) proposed
Linkage Orders prior to this approval Copies of the submission, all subsequent rule change SR-OCC–2006–07 pursuant
and, therefore, without authority, amendments, all written statements to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
parties assessed the BD Surcharge for with respect to the proposed rule Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’).1 Notice
Linkage Orders prior to the approval of change that are filed with the of the proposal was published in the
this proposed rule change may seek Commission, and all written Federal Register on July 10, 2006.2 On
reimbursement. communications relating to the July 21, 2006, OCC amended the
The Commission finds good cause for proposed rule change between the proposed rule change.3 No comment
approving proposed Amendment No. 4 Commission and any person, other than letters were received. For the reasons
before the 30th day after the date of those that may be withheld from the discussed below, the Commission is
publication of notice of filing thereof in public in accordance with the approving the proposed rule change.
the Federal Register pursuant to Section provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
16 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
available for inspection and copying in
10 The 17 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
Schedule set forth the Transaction and the Commission’s Public Reference
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES

Comparison fees assessed on Linkage Orders. 1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).


11 In approving this proposed rule change, the
Room. Copies of such filing also will be 2 Securities Exchange Act Release No. 54060

Commission has considered the proposed rule’s (June 28, 2006), 71 FR 38961.
13 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
impact on efficiency, competition, and capital 3 The amendment, as noted below, is not
formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f). 14 See supra note 9. substantive and did not require republication of the
12 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4). 15 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2). notice. Infra, note 4 and accompanying text.

VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:30 Sep 20, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00099 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\21SEN1.SGM 21SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 183 / Thursday, September 21, 2006 / Notices 55259

II. Description III. Discussion 501(c)(3) may submit proposals to


Section 17A(b)(3)(D) of the Act recruit and select host families and
The purpose of the rule change is to schools for high school students
implement a surcharge to the monthly requires that the rules of a clearing
agency provide for the equitable between the ages of 15 and 17 from
service fee charged to non-clearing countries of the former Soviet Union,
member subscribers of OCC’s Data allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and
other charges.6 The Commission finds thereafter referred to as Eurasia. This
Distribution Service (‘‘DDS’’) that have solicitation and the activities to which
not converted to the new DDS format by that OCC’s proposed rule change is
consistent with this requirement it refers, applies only to FLEX students
the revised mandated conversion date of from the following Eurasian countries:
September 29, 2006. because by establishing a surcharge for
Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Georgia,
continued use of its old legacy data
Both clearing members and non- Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Moldova,
distribution system, OCC will be able to
clearing members may subscribe to Russia, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan,
more equitably allocate its cost of
DDS. A clearing member may subscribe Ukraine, and Uzbekistan.
providing continued service to those In addition to identifying schools and
to DDS in order to receive in a machine DDS subscribers that have failed to
readable format data processed by OCC screening, selecting, and orienting
convert to OCC’s ENCORE DDS format. families, organizations will be
that is proprietary to such clearing
member (e.g., position and post-trade IV. Conclusion responsible for: (1) Providing English
entries) as well as non-proprietary data language enhancement activities for a
On the basis of the foregoing, the
small percentage of students who are
(i.e., data not specific to the clearing Commission finds that the proposed
specially identified; (2) orienting all
member) produced by OCC (e.g., rule change is consistent with the
students at the local level; (3) providing
information relating to series and requirements of the Act and in
support services for students; (4)
prices). Non-clearing members may particular Section 17A of the Act and
arranging enhancement activities and
subscribe to DDS in order to receive the rules and regulations thereunder.
skill-building opportunities; (5)
certain non-proprietary data. It is therefore ordered, pursuant to
assessing student performance and
In December, 2004, OCC informed all Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,7 that the
progress; (6) providing mid-year
DDS subscribers that OCC was requiring proposed rule change (File No. SR– programming and re-entry training; and
them to convert to the new ENCORE OCC–2006–07) be and hereby is (7) evaluating project success.
DDS format by February 28, 2006. approved. Preference will be given to those
For the Commission by the Division of
Although OCC diligently worked with Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated organizations that offer participants
subscribers to facilitate their authority.8 opportunities to develop leadership
implementation of the new DDS format, skills and raise their awareness of
it became apparent that some Jill M. Peterson, tolerance and social justice through
subscribers needed additional time in Assistant Secretary. community activities and networks. The
order to complete their systems work. [FR Doc. 06–7839 Filed 9–20–06; 8:45 am] award of grants and the number of
Accordingly, in December, 2005, OCC BILLING CODE 8010–01–P students who will participate is subject
announced an extension of the to the availability of funding in fiscal
mandated conversion date to September year 2007.
29, 2006. DEPARTMENT OF STATE I. Funding Opportunity Description
After the mandated conversion date, [Public Notice 5551] Authority: Overall grant making
OCC will continue to support the old authority for this program is contained
legacy data service distribution system. Bureau of Educational and Cultural in the Mutual Educational and Cultural
However, for subscribers that do not Affairs (ECA) Request for Grant Exchange Act of 1961, as amended,
meet the revised conversion date of Proposals: The Future Leaders Public Law 87–256, also known as the
September 29, 2006, OCC will charge a Exchange Program: Host Family and Fulbright-Hays Act. The purpose of the
monthly surcharge of $1,000 per month School Placement Act is ‘‘to enable the Government of the
in order to reasonably allocate the costs United States to increase mutual
Announcement Type: New Grant.
of continuing to support the old legacy understanding between the people of
Funding Opportunity Number: ECA/
data distribution system.4 The surcharge the United States and the people of
PE/C/PY–07–06.
will be imposed starting with the other countries * * *; to strengthen the
Catalog of Federal Domestic
October 2006 billing cycle and will ties which unite us with other nations
Assistance Number: 00.000.
continue until the subscriber converts to Key Dates: Application Deadline: by demonstrating the educational and
the new DDS format and ceases to December 4, 2006. cultural interests, developments, and
receive any legacy data service achievements of the people of the
distribution transmissions. OCC will Executive Summary United States and other nations * * *
terminate all legacy data service SUMMARY: The Youth Programs Division and thus to assist in the development of
transmissions after March 30, 2007.5 of the Bureau of Educational and friendly, sympathetic, and peaceful
Cultural Affairs announces an open relations between the United States and
4 Pursuant to a separate rule change, OCC will
competition for the placement the other countries of the world.’’ The
impose the $1,000 per month surcharge on clearing funding authority for the program above
member subscribers to DDS that likewise fail to
component of the Future Leaders
convert to the new format. Implementation of the Exchange (FLEX) program. Public and is provided through legislation.
surcharge on clearing members is pending approval private non-profit organizations meeting Overview: The Future Leaders
of this rule filing by the Commission. Securities the provisions described in Internal Exchange Program seeks to provide
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES

Exchange Act Release No. 54059 (June 28, 2006), 71


Revenue Code section 26 U.S.C. 1,200 high school students with an
FR 38962 (July 10, 2006) [File No. SR–CC–2006– opportunity to live in the United States
06].
5 The March 30, 2007, termination date was the 6 15 U.S.C. 78q–1(b)(3)(D). for the purpose of promoting democratic
subject of the amendment to the proposed rule 7 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2). values and institutions throughout
change filed on July 21, 2006. 8 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). Eurasia. Participants will reside with

VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:30 Sep 20, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00100 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\21SEN1.SGM 21SEN1

Вам также может понравиться