Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
electronically executed Linkage Orders 19(b)(2) of the Act.13 The Exchange filed available for inspection and copying at
also will be charged $0.50 per contract. Amendment No. 4 to reconcile the the principal offices of the Exchange.
The Exchange acknowledges that the proposed rules in the original filing, as All comments received will be posted
Exchange’s previous version of its amended, with the Exchange’s current without change; the Commission does
Schedule did not reflect that the BD rules, which reflect an immediately not edit personal identifying
Surcharge was imposed on effective proposed rule change filed information from submissions. You
electronically executed Linkage after this proposed rule change was should submit only information that
Orders.10 In Amendment No. 4, the published for comment.14 The you wish to make available publicly. All
Exchange proposes to modify the Commission believes that in submissions should refer to Amendment
Schedule to make clear that the BD Amendment No. 4, the Exchange No. 4 to SR–NYSEArca–2006–20 and
Surcharge will be included as a proposes no significant changes to the should be submitted on or before
component of the $0.50 fee assessed for fees proposed in the original filing. October 12, 2006.
electronically executed Linkage Orders. Therefore, the Commission finds good
V. Conclusion
III. Discussion and Commission cause exists to accelerate approval of
Findings Amendment No. 4, pursuant to Section It is therefore ordered, pursuant to
19(b)(2) of the Act.15 Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,16 that
The Commission has reviewed
IV. Solicitation of Comments Amendment No. 4 to the proposed rule
carefully the proposed rule change, as
change (SR–NYSEArca–2006–20) be,
amended, and finds that it is consistent Interested persons are invited to and hereby is, approved on an
with the requirements of the Act and the submit written data, views, and
rules and regulations thereunder accelerated basis.
arguments concerning Amendment No.
applicable to a national securities For the Commission, by the Division of
4, including whether Amendment No. 4
exchange.11 In particular, the Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated
is consistent with the Act. Comments authority.17
Commission believes that the proposal may be submitted by any of the
is consistent with Section 6(b)(4) of the J. Lynn Taylor,
following methods:
Act,12 which requires that the rules of Assistant Secretary.
an exchange provide an equitable Electronic Comments [FR Doc. 06–7842 Filed 9–20–06; 8:45 am]
allocation of reasonable dues, fees and • Use the Commission’s Internet BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
other charges among its members and comment form (http://www.sec.gov/
other persons using its facilities. Under rules/sro.shtml); or
the current NYSE Arca Schedule, • Send an e-mail to rule- SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
manually executed BD orders are comments@sec.gov. Please include File COMMISSION
charged $0.26 per contract and Number SR–NYSEArca–2006–20 on the
electronically executed orders from subject line. [Release No. 34–54448; File No. SR–OCC–
broker-dealers are charged $0.50 per 2006–07]
contract. The Exchange proposed that Paper Comments
manually executed Linkage Orders be • Send paper comments in triplicate Self-Regulatory Organizations; The
charged $0.26 per contract and to Nancy M. Morris, Secretary, Options Clearing Corporation; Order
electronically executed Linkage Orders Securities and Exchange Commission, Approving Proposed Rule Change
be charged $0.50 per contract. Station Place, 100 F Street, NE., Relating to a Surcharge for Non-
Accordingly, the Commission believes Washington, DC 20549–1090. Clearing Member Subscribers That
that the Exchange’s proposed Schedule All submissions should refer to Have Not Met a Mandated Conversion
clearly sets forth the fees imposed on Amendment No. 4 to SR–NYSEArca– Date for Its Data Distribution Service
Linkage Orders. 2006–20. This file number should be
As discussed above, the Exchange September 14, 2006.
included on the subject line if e-mail is
acknowledges, in Amendment No. 4, used. To help the Commission process I. Introduction
that prior versions of its Schedule did and review your comments more
not represent that the $0.25 BD efficiently, please use only one method. On May 15, 2006, The Options
Surcharge was applied to electronically The Commission will post all comments Clearing Corporation (‘‘OCC’’) filed with
executed Linkage Orders. Because the on the Commission’s Internet Web site the Securities and Exchange
Exchange assessed the BD Surcharge on (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Commission (‘‘Commission’’) proposed
Linkage Orders prior to this approval Copies of the submission, all subsequent rule change SR-OCC–2006–07 pursuant
and, therefore, without authority, amendments, all written statements to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
parties assessed the BD Surcharge for with respect to the proposed rule Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’).1 Notice
Linkage Orders prior to the approval of change that are filed with the of the proposal was published in the
this proposed rule change may seek Commission, and all written Federal Register on July 10, 2006.2 On
reimbursement. communications relating to the July 21, 2006, OCC amended the
The Commission finds good cause for proposed rule change between the proposed rule change.3 No comment
approving proposed Amendment No. 4 Commission and any person, other than letters were received. For the reasons
before the 30th day after the date of those that may be withheld from the discussed below, the Commission is
publication of notice of filing thereof in public in accordance with the approving the proposed rule change.
the Federal Register pursuant to Section provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
16 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
available for inspection and copying in
10 The 17 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
Schedule set forth the Transaction and the Commission’s Public Reference
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Commission has considered the proposed rule’s (June 28, 2006), 71 FR 38961.
13 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
impact on efficiency, competition, and capital 3 The amendment, as noted below, is not
formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f). 14 See supra note 9. substantive and did not require republication of the
12 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4). 15 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2). notice. Infra, note 4 and accompanying text.
VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:30 Sep 20, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00099 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\21SEN1.SGM 21SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 183 / Thursday, September 21, 2006 / Notices 55259
VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:30 Sep 20, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00100 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\21SEN1.SGM 21SEN1