Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE of open positions following the proposed threshold) were exercised.
COMMISSION suspension of a clearing member. OCC’s analysis also determined that
OCC has for years maintained an exercise activity in other account ranges
[Release No. 34–54306; File No. SR–OCC– ‘‘exercise by exception’’ procedure. supported the proposed threshold
2006–05] Under that procedure, options that are change.
in the money at expiration by more than OCC surveyed all clearing members to
Self-Regulatory Organizations; The a specified threshold amount are obtain their views and comments on the
Options Clearing Corporation; Notice exercised automatically unless the proposed change to $.05 as the
of Filing of a Proposed Rule Change clearing member carrying the position threshold amount for equity options for
Relating to Expiration Date Exercise instructs otherwise. Equity options are all account types. Survey results
Procedures determined to be in the money or not demonstrated strong support across the
based on the difference between the membership for the change. Eighty-
August 11, 2006. exercise price and the closing price of seven clearing members 5 responded to
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the the underlying equity interest on the the survey with sixty-five clearing
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 last trading day before expiration. In members (75 percent) in favor of the
(‘‘Act’’),1 notice is hereby given that on September 2004, in order to streamline threshold change and 22 clearing
April 26, 2006, The Options Clearing expiration processing, OCC reduced the members (25 percent) opposed. Clearing
Corporation (‘‘OCC’’) filed with the threshold amounts for equity options members supporting the change
Securities and Exchange Commission from $.75 to $.25 in a clearing member’s confirmed the Roundtable’s view that it
(‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule customers’ account and from $.25 to would significantly reduce the number
change as described in Items I, II, and $.15 in any other account (i.e., firm and of instructions they are required to
III below, which items have been market makers’ accounts).3 This change, input on expiration thereby shortening
prepared primarily by OCC. The which was implemented at the request the timeframe for completing
Commission is publishing this notice to of the OCC Roundtable,4 immediately instructions to OCC.
solicit comments on the proposed rule yielded significant benefits to both OCC OCC contacted each firm that opposed
change from interested persons. and clearing members as the time for the threshold change. These firms are
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s submitting exercise instructions was generally mid-size to small retail
Statement of the Terms of Substance of reduced by one to three hours on an clearing members. Their opposition to
the Proposed Rule Change average expiration weekend. the change reflected their principal
Increasing options volumes in 2004 concern about having to input more ‘‘do
The proposed rule change would and 2005 prompted the OCC Roundtable not exercise’’ instructions. Some
amend Rule 805, which describes to review the thresholds applied to indicated concerns about the need to
expiration date exercise procedures equity options in an effort to further educate customers and the possibility
including exercise by exception reduce operational risks and improve that commission costs could make an
processing. expiration processing. Initially, the exercise unprofitable.6 However, all of
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Roundtable proposed that the threshold these firms agreed that they could adapt
Statement of the Purpose of, and for all account types be set at $.01, but to the change if supported by the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule an OCC survey of clearing members majority of clearing members. OCC
Change found that while 65% of responding further reviewed the positions carried
clearing members supported this by these firms and determined that, on
In its filing with the Commission,
change, 35% were against it. A second average, they carry positions in fewer
OCC included statements concerning
OCC survey determined that 75% of than 10 expiring series per expiration
the purpose of and basis for the
responding clearing members were in that are below the current threshold of
proposed rule change and discussed any
favor of a threshold change to $.05 for $.25. This review led OCC to conclude
comments it received on the proposed
all account types and 25% were that the threshold change would result
rule change. The text of these statements
opposed to it. The Roundtable then in only a slight increase in processing
may be examined at the places specified
requested that OCC establish $.05 as the time for these firms and that they would
in Item IV below. OCC has prepared
threshold applicable to equity options not be unduly burdened by its
summaries, set forth in sections (A), (B),
exercises for all account types. implementation.
and (C) below, of the most significant
In response to this request, OCC OCC’s survey of clearing members
aspects of such statements.2
analyzed equity options exercise also asked firms to provide an estimate
(A) Self-Regulatory Organization’s information from the June 2004 through of the time needed to accommodate the
Statement of the Purpose of, and December 2005 expirations. OCC’s threshold change based upon supplied
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule analysis determined that 70% of equity time frames (e.g., 0–3 months or 4–6
Change option contracts carried in clearing months). The majority of firms indicated
The proposed rule change would members’ customers’ accounts that were that they could complete the necessary
amend Rule 805, Expiration Date in the money by the amount of $.05 to systems development and customer
Exercise Procedure, to reduce the $.24 (i.e., the change in the ‘‘in-the- notifications within six months. OCC
threshold amounts used to determine money’’ amount represented by the contacted every firm that commented on
the equity options that are in the money the proposed time frames, and all
for purposes of exercise by exception
3 Securities Exchange Act Release No. 50178
expressed the view that their efforts
(August 10, 2004), 69 FR 51343 (August 18, 2004) would be completed in the six month
processing. A conforming change would [File No. SR–OCC–2004–04].
also be made to Rule 1106, Open 4 The OCC Roundtable is an OCC sponsored time period.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Positions, which concerns the treatment advisory group comprised of representatives from
5 OCC contacted clearing members that did not
OCC’s participant exchanges, OCC, a cross-section
of OCC clearing members, and industry service respond to its survey. These firms expressed no
1 15U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). opinion on the matter.
bureaus. The Roundtable considers operational
2 TheCommission has modified parts of these improvements that may be made to increase 6 As noted, clearing members are able to instruct
statements. efficiencies and lower costs in the options industry. OCC not to exercise an expiring equity option.
VerDate Aug<31>2005 18:35 Aug 17, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00082 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\18AUN1.SGM 18AUN1
47854 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 160 / Friday, August 18, 2006 / Notices
arguments concerning the foregoing, [FR Doc. E6–13616 Filed 8–17–06; 8:45 am]
including whether the proposed rule BILLING CODE 8010–01–P 1 15U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
change is consistent with the Act. 2 15U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
Comments may be submitted by any of 3 The Commission has modified parts of these
VerDate Aug<31>2005 18:35 Aug 17, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00083 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\18AUN1.SGM 18AUN1