Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 2

Federal Register / Vol. 71, No.

159 / Thursday, August 17, 2006 / Notices 47523

Anthropology, University of Colorado INTERNATIONAL TRADE and any individual Commissioner’s


Museum, Henderson Building, Campus COMMISSION statements will be available from the
Box 218, Boulder, CO 80309–0218, Office of the Secretary and at the
[Investigation No. 731–TA–706 (Second
telephone (303) 492–6671, before Review)]
Commission’s Web site.
September 18, 2006. Repatriation of the Authority: This review is being conducted
human remains and associated funerary Canned Pineapple Fruit From Thailand under authority of title VII of the Tariff Act
objects to the Hopi Tribe of Arizona; of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to
AGENCY: United States International section 207.62 of the Commission’s rules.
Pueblo of Acoma, New Mexico; Pueblo
Trade Commission.
of Cochiti, New Mexico; Pueblo of Issued: August 14, 2006.
ACTION: Notice of Commission
Isleta, New Mexico; Pueblo of Jemez, By order of the Commission.
determination to conduct a full five-year
New Mexico; Pueblo of Laguna, New Marilyn R. Abbott,
review concerning the antidumping
Mexico; Pueblo of Nambe, New Mexico; Secretary to the Commission.
duty order on canned pineapple fruit
Pueblo of Picuris, New Mexico; Pueblo from Thailand. [FR Doc. E6–13598 Filed 8–16–06; 8:45 am]
of Pojoaque, New Mexico; Pueblo of San
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
Felipe, New Mexico; Pueblo of San SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives
Ildefonso, New Mexico; Pueblo of San notice that it will proceed with a full
Juan, New Mexico; Pueblo of Sandia, review pursuant to section 751(c)(5) of INTERNATIONAL TRADE
New Mexico; Pueblo of Santa Ana, New the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. COMMISSION
Mexico; Pueblo of Santa Clara, New 1675(c)(5)) to determine whether
Mexico; Pueblo of Santo Domingo, New revocation of the antidumping duty Investigation No. 731–TA–702 (Second
Mexico; Pueblo of Taos, New Mexico; order on canned pineapple fruit from Review); Ferrovanadium and Nitrided
Pueblo of Tesuque, New Mexico; Pueblo Thailand would be likely to lead to Vanadium From Russia
of Zia, New Mexico; Ysleta Del Sur continuation or recurrence of material
injury within a reasonably foreseeable AGENCY: United States International
Pueblo of Texas; and Zuni Tribe of the Trade Commission.
Zuni Reservation, New Mexico may time. A schedule for the review will be
proceed after that date if no additional established and announced at a later ACTION: Scheduling of an expedited five-
date. For further information concerning year review concerning the antidumping
claimants come forward.
the conduct of this review and rules of duty order on ferrovanadium and
The University of Colorado Museum general application, consult the nitrided vanadium from Russia.
is responsible for notifying the Hopi Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Tribe of Arizona; Navajo Nation, Procedure, part 201, subparts A through SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives
Arizona, New Mexico & Utah; Pueblo of E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207, notice of the scheduling of an expedited
Acoma, New Mexico; Pueblo of Cochiti, subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part review pursuant to section 751(c)(3) of
New Mexico; Pueblo of Isleta, New 207). the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C.
Mexico; Pueblo of Jemez, New Mexico; EFFECTIVE DATE: July 7, 2006. 1675(c)(3)) (the Act) to determine
Pueblo of Laguna, New Mexico; Pueblo whether revocation of the antidumping
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
of Nambe, New Mexico; Pueblo of duty order on ferrovanadium and
Mary Messer (202–205–3193), Office of
Picuris, New Mexico; Pueblo of nitrided vanadium from Russia would
Investigations, U.S. International Trade
Pojoaque, New Mexico; Pueblo of San be likely to lead to continuation or
Commission, 500 E Street, SW.,
Felipe, New Mexico; Pueblo of San recurrence of material injury within a
Washington, DC 20436. Hearing-
Ildefonso, New Mexico; Pueblo of San reasonably foreseeable time. For further
impaired persons can obtain
Juan, New Mexico; Pueblo of Sandia, information concerning the conduct of
information on this matter by contacting
New Mexico; Pueblo of Santa Ana, New this review and rules of general
the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–
Mexico; Pueblo of Santa Clara, New application, consult the Commission’s
205–1810. Persons with mobility
Rules of Practice and Procedure, part
Mexico; Pueblo of Santo Domingo, New impairments who will need special
201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part
Mexico; Pueblo of Taos, New Mexico; assistance in gaining access to the
201), and part 207, subparts A, D, E, and
Pueblo of Tesuque, New Mexico; Pueblo Commission should contact the Office
F (19 CFR part 207).
of Zia, New Mexico; Southern Ute of the Secretary at 202–205–2000.
Indian Tribe of the Southern Ute General information concerning the DATES: Effective Date: August 4, 2006.
Reservation, Colorado; Ute Mountain Commission may also be obtained by FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Tribe of the Ute Mountain Reservation, accessing its internet server (http:// Russell Duncan (202–708–4727), Office
Colorado, New Mexico & Utah; Ysleta www.usitc.gov). The public record for of Investigations, U.S. International
Del Sur Pueblo of Texas; and Zuni Tribe this review may be viewed on the Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW.,
of the Zuni Reservation, New Mexico. Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) Washington, DC 20436. Hearing-
at http://edis.usitc.gov. impaired persons can obtain
Dated: July 24, 2006
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On July 7, information on this matter by contacting
Sherry Hutt 2006, the Commission determined that the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–
Manager, National NAGPRA Program it should proceed to a full review in the 205–1810. Persons with mobility
[FR Doc. 06–13602 Filed 8–16–06; 8:45 am] subject five-year review pursuant to impairments who will need special
BILLING CODE 4312–50–S section 751(c)(5) of the Act. The assistance in gaining access to the
Commission found that both the Commission should contact the Office
domestic and respondent interested of the Secretary at 202–205–2000.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES

party group responses to its notice of General information concerning the


institution (71 FR 16585, April 3, 2006) Commission may also be obtained by
were adequate. A record of the accessing its internet server (http://
Commissioners’ votes, the www.usitc.gov). The public record for
Commission’s statement on adequacy, this review may be viewed on the

VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:36 Aug 16, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00045 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\17AUN1.SGM 17AUN1
47524 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 159 / Thursday, August 17, 2006 / Notices

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) submit a brief written statement (which By order of the Commission.
at http://edis.usitc.gov. shall not contain any new factual Marilyn R. Abbott,
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: information) pertinent to the review by Secretary to the Commission.
Background: On August 4, 2006, the September 5, 2006. However, should the [FR Doc. E6–13596 Filed 8–16–06; 8:45 am]
Commission determined that the Department of Commerce extend the BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
domestic interested party group time limit for its completion of the final
response to its notice of institution (71 results of its review, the deadline for
FR 25609, May 1, 2006) of the subject comments (which may not contain new
five-year review was adequate and that factual information) on Commerce’s DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
the respondent interested party group final results is three business days after
response was inadequate. The the issuance of Commerce’s results. If Membership of the Senior Executive
Commission did not find any other comments contain business proprietary Service Standing Performance Review
circumstances that would warrant information (BPI), they must conform Boards
conducting a full review.1 Accordingly, with the requirements of sections 201.6,
the Commission determined that it 207.3, and 207.7 of the Commission’s AGENCY: Department of Justice.
would conduct an expedited review rules. The Commission’s rules do not ACTION: Notice of Department of
pursuant to section 751(c)(3) of the Act.2 authorize filing of submissions with the Justice’s standing members of the Senior
Staff report: A staff report containing Secretary by facsimile or electronic Executive Service Performance Review
information concerning the subject means, except to the extent permitted by Boards.
matter of the review will be placed in section 201.8 of the Commission’s rules,
the nonpublic record on August 30, as amended, 67 FR 68036 (November 8, SUMMARY: Pursuant to the requirements
2006, and made available to persons on 2002). Even where electronic filing of a of 5 U.S.C. 4314(c)(4), the Department of
the Administrative Protective Order document is permitted, certain Justice announces the membership of its
service list for this review. A public documents must also be filed in paper 2006 Senior Executive service (SES)
version will be issued thereafter, form, as specified in II (C) of the Standing Performance Review Boards
pursuant to section 207.62(d)(4) of the Commission’s Handbook on Electronic (PRBs). The purpose of the PRBs is to
Commission’s rules. Filing Procedures, 67 FR 68168, 68173 provide fair and impartial review of SES
Written submissions: As provided in (November 8, 2002). performance appraisals, bonus
section 207.62(d) of the Commission’s In accordance with sections 201.16(c) recommendations and pay adjustments.
rules, interested parties that are parties and 207.3 of the rules, each document The PRBs will make recommendations
to the review and that have provided filed by a party to the review must be regarding the final performance ratings
individually adequate responses to the served on all other parties to the review to be assigned, SES bonuses and/or pay
notice of institution,3 and any party (as identified by either the public or BPI adjustments to be awarded.
other than an interested party to the service list), and a certificate of service
must be timely filed. The Secretary will FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rod
review may file written comments with
not accept a document for filing without Markham, Deputy Director, Personnel
the Secretary on what determination the
a certificate of service. Staff, Justice Management Division,
Commission should reach in the review.
Department of Justice, Washington, DC
Comments are due on or before Authority: This review is being conducted
20530; (202) 514–4350.
September 5, 2006, and may not contain under authority of title VII of the Tariff Act
new factual information. Any person of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to Lee J. Lofthus,
that is neither a party to the five-year section 207.62 of the Commission’s rules. Acting Assistant Attorney General for
review nor an interested party may Issued: August 14, 2006. Administration.

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO, FIREARMS, AND EXPLOSIVES

BAILEY, GREGG D ............................... ASSISTANT DIRECTOR (SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY/CHIEF INFORMATION OFFICER).
BARAN, VIVIAN A ................................. DEPUTY ASSISTANT DIRECTOR (OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT).
BARRERA, HUGO ................................. DEPUTY ASSISTANT DIRECTOR (OFFICE OF STRATEGIC INTELLIGENCE AND INFORMATION).
BELL, WILLIAM L .................................. DEPUTY ASSISTANT DIRECTOR (SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY).
BOUCHARD, MICHAEL R .................... ASSISTANT DIRECTOR (FIELD OPERATIONS).
CARROLL, CARSON W ........................ DEPUTY ASSISTANT DIRECTOR (FIELD OPERATIONS CENTRAL).
CARTER, DONNIE A ............................ SPECIAL AGENT IN CHARGE (HOUSTON FIELD DIVISION).
CARTER, RONNIE A ............................ SPECIAL AGENT IN CHARGE (DALLAS FIELD DIVISION).
CAVANAUGH, JAMES M ...................... DIVISION DIRECTOR/SPECIAL AGENT IN CHARGE (NASHVILLE FIELD DIVISION).
CHASE, RICHARD E ............................ ASSISTANT DIRECTOR (OFFICE OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY AND SECURITY OPER-
ATIONS).
DOMENECH, EDGAR AXEL ................. DEPUTY DIRECTOR.
ETHRIDGE, MICHAEL W ...................... DIRECTOR (LABORATORY SERVICES).
FORD, WILFRED L ............................... ASSISTANT DIRECTOR (PUBLIC AND GOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS).
HARRIS, GREGORY PAUL .................. CHIEF OF STAFF.
HOOVER, WILLIAM .............................. SPECIAL AGENT IN CHARGE (WASHINGTON FIELD DIVISION DIRECTOR).
KOETT, IMELDA M ............................... DEPUTY CHIEF COUNSEL.

1 A record of the Commissioners’ votes, the group response for this review was adequate and Association to be individually adequate. Comments
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES

Commission’s statement on adequacy, and any the respondent group response was inadequate, but from other interested parties will not be accepted
individual Commissioner’s statements will be that circumstances warranted a full review. (see 19 CFR 207.62(d)(2)).
available from the Office of the Secretary and at the 3 The Commission has found the responses
Commission’s Web site. submitted by Bear Metallurgical Co., Gulf Chemical
2 Chairman Daniel R. Pearson and Commissioner & Metallurgical Corp., Metallurg Vanadium Corp.,
Deanna Tanner Okun concluded that the domestic and The Vanadium Producers and Reclaimers

VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:36 Aug 16, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00046 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\17AUN1.SGM 17AUN1

Вам также может понравиться