Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:36 Aug 16, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00045 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\17AUN1.SGM 17AUN1
47524 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 159 / Thursday, August 17, 2006 / Notices
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) submit a brief written statement (which By order of the Commission.
at http://edis.usitc.gov. shall not contain any new factual Marilyn R. Abbott,
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: information) pertinent to the review by Secretary to the Commission.
Background: On August 4, 2006, the September 5, 2006. However, should the [FR Doc. E6–13596 Filed 8–16–06; 8:45 am]
Commission determined that the Department of Commerce extend the BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
domestic interested party group time limit for its completion of the final
response to its notice of institution (71 results of its review, the deadline for
FR 25609, May 1, 2006) of the subject comments (which may not contain new
five-year review was adequate and that factual information) on Commerce’s DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
the respondent interested party group final results is three business days after
response was inadequate. The the issuance of Commerce’s results. If Membership of the Senior Executive
Commission did not find any other comments contain business proprietary Service Standing Performance Review
circumstances that would warrant information (BPI), they must conform Boards
conducting a full review.1 Accordingly, with the requirements of sections 201.6,
the Commission determined that it 207.3, and 207.7 of the Commission’s AGENCY: Department of Justice.
would conduct an expedited review rules. The Commission’s rules do not ACTION: Notice of Department of
pursuant to section 751(c)(3) of the Act.2 authorize filing of submissions with the Justice’s standing members of the Senior
Staff report: A staff report containing Secretary by facsimile or electronic Executive Service Performance Review
information concerning the subject means, except to the extent permitted by Boards.
matter of the review will be placed in section 201.8 of the Commission’s rules,
the nonpublic record on August 30, as amended, 67 FR 68036 (November 8, SUMMARY: Pursuant to the requirements
2006, and made available to persons on 2002). Even where electronic filing of a of 5 U.S.C. 4314(c)(4), the Department of
the Administrative Protective Order document is permitted, certain Justice announces the membership of its
service list for this review. A public documents must also be filed in paper 2006 Senior Executive service (SES)
version will be issued thereafter, form, as specified in II (C) of the Standing Performance Review Boards
pursuant to section 207.62(d)(4) of the Commission’s Handbook on Electronic (PRBs). The purpose of the PRBs is to
Commission’s rules. Filing Procedures, 67 FR 68168, 68173 provide fair and impartial review of SES
Written submissions: As provided in (November 8, 2002). performance appraisals, bonus
section 207.62(d) of the Commission’s In accordance with sections 201.16(c) recommendations and pay adjustments.
rules, interested parties that are parties and 207.3 of the rules, each document The PRBs will make recommendations
to the review and that have provided filed by a party to the review must be regarding the final performance ratings
individually adequate responses to the served on all other parties to the review to be assigned, SES bonuses and/or pay
notice of institution,3 and any party (as identified by either the public or BPI adjustments to be awarded.
other than an interested party to the service list), and a certificate of service
must be timely filed. The Secretary will FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rod
review may file written comments with
not accept a document for filing without Markham, Deputy Director, Personnel
the Secretary on what determination the
a certificate of service. Staff, Justice Management Division,
Commission should reach in the review.
Department of Justice, Washington, DC
Comments are due on or before Authority: This review is being conducted
20530; (202) 514–4350.
September 5, 2006, and may not contain under authority of title VII of the Tariff Act
new factual information. Any person of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to Lee J. Lofthus,
that is neither a party to the five-year section 207.62 of the Commission’s rules. Acting Assistant Attorney General for
review nor an interested party may Issued: August 14, 2006. Administration.
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO, FIREARMS, AND EXPLOSIVES
BAILEY, GREGG D ............................... ASSISTANT DIRECTOR (SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY/CHIEF INFORMATION OFFICER).
BARAN, VIVIAN A ................................. DEPUTY ASSISTANT DIRECTOR (OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT).
BARRERA, HUGO ................................. DEPUTY ASSISTANT DIRECTOR (OFFICE OF STRATEGIC INTELLIGENCE AND INFORMATION).
BELL, WILLIAM L .................................. DEPUTY ASSISTANT DIRECTOR (SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY).
BOUCHARD, MICHAEL R .................... ASSISTANT DIRECTOR (FIELD OPERATIONS).
CARROLL, CARSON W ........................ DEPUTY ASSISTANT DIRECTOR (FIELD OPERATIONS CENTRAL).
CARTER, DONNIE A ............................ SPECIAL AGENT IN CHARGE (HOUSTON FIELD DIVISION).
CARTER, RONNIE A ............................ SPECIAL AGENT IN CHARGE (DALLAS FIELD DIVISION).
CAVANAUGH, JAMES M ...................... DIVISION DIRECTOR/SPECIAL AGENT IN CHARGE (NASHVILLE FIELD DIVISION).
CHASE, RICHARD E ............................ ASSISTANT DIRECTOR (OFFICE OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY AND SECURITY OPER-
ATIONS).
DOMENECH, EDGAR AXEL ................. DEPUTY DIRECTOR.
ETHRIDGE, MICHAEL W ...................... DIRECTOR (LABORATORY SERVICES).
FORD, WILFRED L ............................... ASSISTANT DIRECTOR (PUBLIC AND GOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS).
HARRIS, GREGORY PAUL .................. CHIEF OF STAFF.
HOOVER, WILLIAM .............................. SPECIAL AGENT IN CHARGE (WASHINGTON FIELD DIVISION DIRECTOR).
KOETT, IMELDA M ............................... DEPUTY CHIEF COUNSEL.
1 A record of the Commissioners’ votes, the group response for this review was adequate and Association to be individually adequate. Comments
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
Commission’s statement on adequacy, and any the respondent group response was inadequate, but from other interested parties will not be accepted
individual Commissioner’s statements will be that circumstances warranted a full review. (see 19 CFR 207.62(d)(2)).
available from the Office of the Secretary and at the 3 The Commission has found the responses
Commission’s Web site. submitted by Bear Metallurgical Co., Gulf Chemical
2 Chairman Daniel R. Pearson and Commissioner & Metallurgical Corp., Metallurg Vanadium Corp.,
Deanna Tanner Okun concluded that the domestic and The Vanadium Producers and Reclaimers
VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:36 Aug 16, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00046 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\17AUN1.SGM 17AUN1