46242 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No.
155 / Friday, August 11, 2006 / Notices
the Secretary of Commerce on August 7,
2006. The views of the Commission are
contained in USITC Publication 3878
(August, 2006), entitled Certain
Polyester Staple Fiber from China:
Investigation No. 731–TA–1104
(Preliminary).
Issued: August 7, 2006.
By order of the Commission.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E6–13218 Filed 8–10–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Office of Justice Programs
[OMB Number: 1121–NEW]
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Proposed Collection;
Comments Requested
ACTION: 30-day emergency notice of
information collection under review:
International Terrorism Victim Expense
Reimbursement Program Application.
The Department of Justice, Office of
Justice Programs, Office for Victims of
Crime has submitted the following new
information collection request to the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review and clearance in
accordance with emergency review
procedures of the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995. OMB approval has been
requested by August 28, 2006. The
proposed information collection is
published to obtain comments from the
public and affected agencies. If granted,
the emergency approval is only valid for
180 days. Comments should be directed
to OMB, Office of Information and
Regulation Affairs, Attention:
Department of Justice Desk Officer (202)
395–6466, Washington, DC 20503.
During the first 60 days of this same
review period, a regular review of this
information collection is also being
undertaken. All comments and
suggestions, or questions regarding
additional information, to include
obtaining a copy of the proposed
information collection instrument with
instructions, should be directed to
Barbara Walker, Office for Victims of
Crime , 810 Seventh Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20531; by telefacsmile
on (202) 514–2940. or by e-mail, to
ITVERP@usdoj.gov.
hsrobinson on PROD1PC67 with NOTICES1
Your comments should address one or
more of the following four points:
—Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:03 Aug 10, 2006 Jkt 208001
whether the information will have
practical utility;
—Evaluate the accuracy of the agencies
estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
—Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
—Minimize the burden of the collection
of information on those who are to
respond, including through the use of
appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms
of information technology (e.g.,
permitting electronic submission of
responses).
Overview of this information:
(1) Type of information collection:
New.
(2) The title of the form/collection:
International Terrorism Victim Expense
Reimbursement Program (ITVERP)
Application.
(3) The agency form number, if any,
and the applicable component of the
department sponsoring the collection:
Form Number: none. Office of Justice
Programs.
(4) Affected public who will be asked
or required to respond, as well as a brief
abstract: Primary: Individual victims,
surviving family members or personal
representatives Other: Federal
Government. This application will be
used to apply for expense
reimbursement by U.S. nationals and
U.S. Government employees who are
victims of acts of international terrorism
that occur(red) outside of the United
States. The application will be used to
collect necessary information on the
expenses incurred by the applicant, as
associated with his or her victimization,
as well as other pertinent information,
and will be used by OVC to make an
award determination.
(5) An estimate of the total number of
respondents and the amount of time
estimated for an average respondent to
respond/reply: It is estimated that 2,000
respondents will complete the
certification in approximately 45
minutes.
(6) An estimate of the total public
burden (in hours) associated with the
collection: The estimated total public
burden associated with this information
collection is 1,500 hours.
If additional information is required
contact: Lynn Bryant, Department
Clearance Officer, Policy and Planning
Staff, Justice Management Division,
United States Department of Justice, 601
D Street NW., Patrick Henry Building,
Suite 1600, NW, Washington, DC 20530.
PO 00000 Frm 00059 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\11AUN1.SGM
Dated: August 8, 2006.
Lynn Bryant,
Department Clearance Officer, United States
Department of Justice.
[FR Doc. E6–13176 Filed 8–10–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–18–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Office of the Secretary
Submission for OMB Review:
Comment Request
August 4, 2006.
The Department of Labor (DOL) has
submitted the following public
information collection request (ICR) to
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review and approval in
accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–13,
44 U.S.C. chapter 35). A copy of this
ICR, with applicable supporting
documentation, may be obtained by
contacting Darrin King on 202–693–
4129 (this is not a toll-free number) or
e-mail: king.darrin@dol.gov.
Comments should be sent to Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Attn: OMB Desk Officer for the
Employment Standards Administration
(ESA), Office of Management and
Budget, Room 10235, Washington, DC
20503, 202–395–7316 (this is not a toll-
free number), within 30 days from the
date of this publication in the Federal
Register.
The OMB is particularly interested in
comments which:
• Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
• Evaluate the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
• Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
• Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including through the
use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology,
e.g., permitting electronic submission of
responses.
Agency: Employment Standards
Administration.
Type of Review: Extension of
currently approved collection.
Title: Overpayment Recovery
Questionnaire.
11AUN1
 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 155 / Friday, August 11, 2006 / Notices
OMB Number: 1215–0144.
Form Number: OWCP–20.
Frequency: On occasion.
Type of Response: Reporting.
Affected Public: Individuals or
households.
Number of Respondents: 4,020.
Annual Responses: 4,020.
Average Response Time: 45–75
minutes, average 1 hour.
Total Annual Burden Hours: 4,020.
Total Annualized capital/startup
costs: $0.
Total Annual Costs (operating/
maintaining systems or purchasing
services): $1,768.
Description: The Federal Coal Mine
Health and Safety Act of 1969, as
amended, 30 U.S.C. 923(b) and 20 CFR
725.544(c), the Energy Employees
Occupational Illness Compensation
Program Act of 2000, as amended, 42
U.S.C. 7385j–2 and 20 CFR 30.510
through 30.520, and the Federal
Employees’ Compensation Act, 5 U.S.C.
8129(b) and 20 CFR 10.430–10.441,
provide for the recovery or waiver of
overpayments of benefits to
beneficiaries. The OWCP–20 is used by
OWCP examiners to ascertain the
financial condition of the beneficiary
who has been overpaid to determine the
present and potential income and assets
available for collection proceedings. The
questionnaire also provides a means for
the beneficiary to explain why he/she is
not at fault for the overpayment. If this
information were not collected, Black
Lung, EEOICPA and FECA would have
little basis to decide on collection
proceedings.
Ira L. Mills,
Departmental Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. E6–13188 Filed 8–10–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–23–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–59,787]
AGX Corporation, New York, NY;
Notice of Termination of Investigation
Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade
Act of 1974, an investigation was
initiated on July 25, 2006 in response to
a petition filed on behalf of workers at
AGX Corporation, New York, New York.
The petitioning group of workers is
hsrobinson on PROD1PC67 with NOTICES1
covered by an earlier petition (TA–W–
59,744) filed on June 30, 2006 that is the
subject of an ongoing investigation for
which a determination has not yet been
issued. Further investigation in this case
would duplicate efforts and serve no
VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:03 Aug 10, 2006 Jkt 208001
purpose; therefore the investigation
under this petition has been terminated.
Signed in Washington, DC, this 27th day of
July 2006.
Richard Church,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E6–13185 Filed 8–10–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–59,785]
Collins & Aikman, Nashville, TN;
Notice of Termination of Investigation
Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade
Act of 1974, as amended, an
investigation was initiated on July 25,
2006, in response to a petition filed by
The United Steelworkers of America,
District 9, Local 5887 on behalf of
workers of Collins & Aikman, Nashville,
Tennessee.
This petition is a duplicate of petition
number TA–W–59,737, filed on July 18,
2006, that is the subject of an ongoing
investigation. Consequently, this
investigation is terminated.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 26th day of
July, 2006.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E6–13183 Filed 8–10–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–59,426]
Continental Tire North America Tire
Technology Charlotte, NC; Notice of
Termination of Investigation
Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade
Act of 1974, as amended, an
investigation was initiated on May 19,
2006 in response to a worker petition
filed by a company official on behalf of
workers of Continental Tire North
America, Tire Technology, Charlotte,
North Carolina.
The petitioning group of workers is
covered by an active certification (TA–
W–57,487), which expires on August 9,
2007. Consequently, further
investigation in this case would serve
no purpose, and the investigation has
been terminated.
PO 00000 Frm 00060 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\11AUN1.SGM
46243
Signed at Washington, DC this 18th day of
July 2006.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E6–13182 Filed 8–10–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–59,183]
Gehl Company, West Bend, WI; Notice
of Affirmative Determination Regarding
Application for Reconsideration
By letter dated June 28, 2006, the
United Steelworkers of America,
requested administrative
reconsideration of the Department of
Labor’s Notice of Negative
Determination Regarding Eligibility to
Apply for Worker Adjustment
Assistance and Alternative Trade
Adjustment Assistance applicable to
workers of the subject firm. The denial
notice was signed on June 7, 2006, and
published in the Federal Register on
July 14, 2006 (71 FR 40160).
The initial investigation resulted in a
negative determination based on the
finding that the subject firm did not
import agricultural implements or shift
production abroad in 2004, 2005, or
during the period of January through
March 2006. Furthermore, the
Department surveyed the subject firm’s
major declining customers resulting in
the revelation of minimal imports of
agricultural implements during the
relevant period and increased reliance
on purchases from other domestic
sources.
The Department reviewed the request
for reconsideration and has determined
that the petitioner has provided
additional information regarding a shift
in the firm’s production of parts and
components. Therefore, the Department
will conduct further investigation to
determine if the workers meet the
eligibility requirements of the Trade Act
of 1974.
Conclusion
After careful review of the
application, I conclude that the claim is
of sufficient weight to justify
reconsideration of the Department of
Labor’s prior decision. The application
is, therefore, granted.
11AUN1