Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Under supervision of
Dr . Mohamed Nabil
Outlines
Introduction.
Modeling.
Case study.
3
Introduction
Hollow block and Ribbed slabs are formed by placing blocks on the slab
and concrete ribs.
In case of hollow block slab voided blocks are placed to reduce the total
weight of the slab .
Types hollow block slab are one way and two way slabs .
4
Introduction
Economic for spans more than 5m with light or moderate live loads, such as
hospitals, office or residential buildings.
ACI 318
ECP 203
BS 8110
Euro code 2
b t/4
11
Simply sup.
L/20
L/20
1 end cont.
L/25
L/20.8
2 end cont.
cantilever
L/28
L/8
----L/5.6
ts
ts
e 700 mm
b
L.L 3
KN/m2 , Ls >
5
One X rib
/
L.L > 3
KN/m2
, Ls (4:7)
One X rib
L/16
-----------
ts
L/18.5
L/21
L/8
ts
e 1500 mm
e 1500 mm
e 750 mm
b t/4
b t/4
b 100 mm
-------
If L 10 th.b
-------
L.L >
7m.
3 X ribs
12
13
Fcu= 25 N/mm2
Fy= 360 N/mm2
F.C= 1.5 KN/m2
L.L= 3.0 KN/m2
14
th.b
250 mm
250 mm
250 mm
300
tS
50 mm
50 mm
50 mm
50 mm
h
Mu (Kn.m/rib)
200
200
200
250
19.187
19.187
17.75
23.5
AS
293.30 mm2
255.72 mm2
322.005 mm2
226.67 mm2
100 200 mm
100 200 mm
100 200 mm
100 250 mm
Cross ribs
No cross ribs
No cross ribs
No cross ribs
Solid part
Conc.
Quantities
Short dir.
long dir.
Short dir.
0.3 m.
0.3 m.
0.3 m.
2.806 m3
long dir.
Short dir.
long dir.
0.3 m.
0.3 m.
0.3 m.
0.3 m.
2.806 m3
0.25 m.
2.934 m3
3.07 m3
15
One way
slab
Fcu= 25 N/mm2
Two way
slab
16
th.b.
320 mm
250 mm
h
ts
250 mm
70 mm
200 mm
50 mm
Mu (KN.m/rib)
As
45.64
529.255
mm2/
rib
dir.
dir.
15.68
15.68
Ribs dim.
0.12 * 0.25 m
0.1 * 0.2 m
11
12
1
5.6854 m3
12
5.234 m3
RFT
1017.79 mm2 /m
981.54 mm2/m
It is obvious that the RFT and concrete quantities in the two way hollow
block slab is more economic however the execution of the two way hollow
block slab is harder than the one way hollow block slab.
17
At first one cross rib is put in the mid span of the slab.
Then two cross ribs are put at 1/3 of the span from each side.
18
19
The two cases have the same deflection value so it is more economic to use one
cross rib at mid span
20
Modeling
Introduction
The Example:
L.L =3 KN /m2 ,
0.162213
=
57
1.3 kN/m2.
21
Modeling
Model 1
The ribs are frame elements with cross section as T-section and connected
together with a virtual slab with very small thickness.
22
Modeling
Model 2
The ribs are frame elements with cross section as T-section and connected
together with frame elements with cross section as rectangular section .
24
Modeling
Model 3
The ribs are converted to a thickness on the whole slab and use virtual slab to
connect between elements with very small thickness.
25
Modeling
Model 4
The ribs are represented as frame elements with rectangle section and the
connecting element is frame element with rectangle section.
27
Modeling
This table shows the differences between the models and the manual
solution .
Model
M (ultimate)
KN .m
Manual
19.3675
19.1793
19.0767
19.1555
19.1875
Cross section
of ribs
T-section
T-section
Rectangular
section
Rectangular
section
Connecting
elements
Virtual slab
Frames
Virtual slab
Frames
Loads
On slab
W (rib)
On slab
W (rib)
Self weight
multiplier
28
Case study
Introduction:
Different case study for hollow block slabs and ribbed slabs.
Case 1
29
Case study
30
Case study
Case 2
31
Case study
Case 3
Case study
Case 4
Ribbed slabs one way and two way ( waffle ) and how the blocks are
placed .
33
Case study
34
Case study
Case 5
35
Case study
Case 6
Questions
37
38