Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 3

Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form

Name of Employee:
Position:

Name of Rater:
MASTER TEACHER

Position:

Review Period:

PRINCIPAL /HEAD TEACHER

Date of Review:

OFFICE:
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING
MFOs

KRAs
A.
Instructional
Competence

OBJECTIVES
1. Handled 360 minutes actual teaching loads daily and
related work

2. Students achieved at least 75 percentage of mastery in


all subject areas in the achievement test

3. Attained 100% of the required learning competencies for


the students in every quarter

TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION


TIMELINE

Weigh
t per
KRA
40%

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
(Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)
5 - Outstanding
100% and above required teaching load with
teaching related work (ancilliary services)
handled for the year
4 Very Satisfactory
95% required teaching load with teaching
related work (ancilliary services) handled for
the year
3 Satisfactory
90% required teaching load with teaching
related work (ancilliary services) handled for
the year
2 Unsatisfactory
85% required teaching load with teaching
related work (ancilliary services) handled for
the year
1 Poor
75% and below of required teaching loads
without ancilliary services handled for the year
5 Outstanding
75% and above (POM)
4 Very Satisfactory
59%-74% (POM)
3 Satisfactory
44%-58% (POM)
2- Unsatisfactory
29%-43% (POM)
1 Poor
28% and below (POM)
5- Outstanding
100% of the required competencies in every
quarter completed
4- Very Satisfactory
90-99% and above of the required
competencies in every quarter completed
3- Satisfactory
80-89% of the required competencies in every

ACTUAL
RESULTS

RATING

SCORE
*

_____________________________
Rater

___________________ Dr. ROWENA C. BANZON, CESO V


Ratee
Approving Authority

Вам также может понравиться