Federal Register / Vol. 71, No.
117 / Monday, June 19, 2006 / Proposed Rules
and petty officers of the Coast Guard on
board Coast Guard, Coast Guard
Auxiliary, local, state, and federal law
enforcement vessels. Upon being hailed
by U.S. Coast Guard patrol personnel by
siren, radio, flashing light, or other
means, the operator of a vessel shall
proceed as directed. The Coast Guard
may be assisted by other federal, state,
or local agencies.
Dated: May 31, 2006.
C.V. Strangfeld,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port, Sector San Diego.
[FR Doc. E6–9588 Filed 6–16–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 52 and 81
[EPA–R10–OAR–2006–0316; FRL–8175–8]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans;
Medford-Ashland PM10 Attainment
Plan, Maintenance Plan and
Redesignation Request
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve
a PM10 State Implementation Plan (SIP)
attainment plan and maintenance plan
for the Medford-Ashland, Oregon
nonattainment area (Medford-Ashland
NAA) and to redesignate the area from
nonattattainment to attainment for
PM10. In addition, EPA is proposing to
approve revisions to Oregon’s statewide
industrial source rules for new and
modified major industrial sources of
PM10 and revisions to the area-specific
industrial source rules that apply in the
Medford-Ashland NAA. EPA is
proposing to approve the SIP revision
and redesignation request because the
State adequately demonstrates that the
control measures being implemented in
the Medford-Ashland nonattainment
area result in attainment and
maintenance of the PM10 National
Ambient Air Quality Standards and all
other requirements of the Clean Air Act
for redesignation to attainment are met.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before July 19, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R10–
OAR–2006–0316, by one of the
following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line
instructions for submitting comments.
VerDate Aug<31>2005 18:57 Jun 16, 2006 Jkt 208001
35233
• Mail: Gina Bonifacino, Office of Air,
Waste and Toxics, AWT–107 EPA,
Region 10, 1200 Sixth Ave., Seattle,
Washington 98101.
• Hand Delivery: EPA, Region 10
Mail Room, 9th Floor, 1200 Sixth Ave.,
Seattle, Washington 98101. Attention:
Gina Bonifacino, Office of Air, Waste
and Toxics, OAWT–107. Such
deliveries are only accepted during
normal hours of operation, and special
arrangements should be made for
deliveries of boxed information.
Please see the direct final rule which
is located in the Rules section of this
Federal Register for detailed
instructions on how to submit
comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gina
Bonifacino at telephone number: (206)
553–2970, e-mail address:
bonifacino.gina@epa.gov, fax number:
(206) 553–0110, or the above EPA,
Region 10 address.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For
further information, please see the
direct final action, of the same title,
which is located in the Rules section of
this Federal Register. EPA is approving
the State’s SIP revision as a direct final
rule without prior proposal because
EPA views this as a noncontroversial
SIP revision and anticipates no adverse
comments. A detailed rationale for the
approval is set forth in the preamble to
the direct final rule. If EPA receives no
adverse comments, EPA will not take
further action on this proposed rule.
If EPA receives adverse comments,
EPA will withdraw the direct final rule
and it will not take effect. EPA will
address all public comments in a
subsequent final rule based on this
proposed rule. EPA will not institute a
second comment period on this action.
Any parties interested in commenting
on this action should do so at this time.
Please note that if we receive adverse
comment on an amendment, paragraph,
or section of this rule and if that
provision may be severed from the
remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt
as final those provisions of the rule that
are not the subject of an adverse
comment.
Dated: May 16, 2006.
L. Michael Bogert,
Regional Administrator, Region 10.
[FR Doc. 06–5507 Filed 6–16–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
PO 00000 Frm 00033 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\19JNP1.SGM
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Federal Emergency Management
Agency
44 CFR Part 67
[Docket No. FEMA–B–7461]
Proposed Flood Elevation
Determinations
AGENCY: Federal Emergency
Management Agency (FEMA),
Department of Homeland Security.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
SUMMARY: Technical information or
comments are requested on the
proposed Base (1% annual-chance)
Flood Elevations (BFEs) and proposed
BFE modifications for the communities
listed below. The BFEs and modified
BFEs are the basis for the floodplain
management measures that the
community is required either to adopt
or to show evidence of being already in
effect in order to qualify or remain
qualified for participation in the
National Flood Insurance Program
(NFIP).
DATES: The comment period is ninety
(90) days following the second
publication of this proposed rule in a
newspaper of local circulation in each
community.
ADDRESSES: The proposed BFEs for each
community are available for inspection
at the office of the Chief Executive
Officer of each community. The
respective addresses are listed in the
table below.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
William Blanton, Engineering
Management Section, Mitigation
Division, Federal Emergency
Management Agency, 500 C Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646–3151.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: FEMA
proposes to make determinations of
BFEs and modified BFEs for each
community listed below, in accordance
with section 110 of the Flood Disaster
Protection Act of 1973, 42 U.S.C. 4104,
and 44 CFR 67.4(a).
These proposed BFEs and modified
BFEs, together with the floodplain
management criteria required by 44 CFR
60.3, are the minimum that are required.
They should not be construed to mean
that the community must change any
existing ordinances that are more
stringent in their floodplain
management requirements. The
community may at any time enact
stricter requirements of its own, or
pursuant to policies established by other
Federal, State, or regional entities.
19JNP1
 35234 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 117 / Monday, June 19, 2006 / Proposed Rules

These proposed elevations are used to
meet the floodplain management
requirements of the NFIP and are also
used to calculate the appropriate flood
insurance premium rates for new
buildings built after these elevations are
made final, and for the contents in these
buildings.
National Environmental Policy Act.
This proposed rule is categorically
excluded from the requirements of 44
CFR part 10, Environmental
Consideration. No environmental
impact assessment has been prepared.
Regulatory Flexibility Act. The
Mitigation Division Director certifies
that this proposed rule is exempt from
the requirements of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act because proposed or
modified BFEs are required by the Flood
Disaster Protection Act of 1973, 42
U.S.C. 4104, and are required to
establish and maintain community
eligibility in the NFIP. No regulatory
flexibility analysis has been prepared.
Regulatory Classification. This
proposed rule is not a significant
regulatory action under the criteria of
Section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866 of
September 30, 1993, Regulatory
Planning and Review, 58 FR 51735.
Executive Order 13132, Federalism.
This rule involves no policies that have
federalism implications under Executive
Order 13132.
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform. This rule meets the applicable
standards of Executive Order 12988.
List of Subjects in 44 CFR Part 67
Administrative practice and
procedure, Flood insurance, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements.
Accordingly, 44 CFR part 67 is
proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 67—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 67
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 4001 et seq.;
Reorganization Plan No. 3 of 1978, 3 CFR,
1978 Comp., p. 329; E.O. 12127, 44 FR 19367,
3 CFR, 1979 Comp., p. 376.
§ 67.4 [Amended]
2. The tables published under the
authority of § 67.4 are proposed to be
amended as follows:

GUADALUPE COUNTY, TEXAS AND INCORPORATED AREAS

*Elevation in feet (NGVD)
+Elevation in feet (NAVD)
#Depth in feet above
Flooding source(s) Location of referenced elevation Communities affected
ground

Effective Modified

Cibolo Creek ..............
Cibolo Creek Tributary
No. 13.
Dietz Creek ................
East Branch Dietz
Creek.
Geronimo Creek ........
Guadalupe River ........
Town Creek ...............
Town Creek Tributary
1.
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS
At intersection of IH 35 and Cibolo Creek ... *751 +755 Guadalupe County Uninc. Areas), City of
Schertz.
At intersection of Lookout Road and Cibolo *757 +763
Creek.
At confluence with East Branch Dietz Creek None +728 Guadalupe County Uninc. Areas), City of
and Cibolo Creek Tributary No. 13. Cibolo.
Approximately 2,500 feet upstream of the None +776
confluence with East Branch Dietz Creek
and Cibolo Creek Tributary No. 13.
Approximately 1,000 feet downstream of None +692 Guadalupe County Uninc. Areas), City of
the confluence with Cibolo Tributary 11 Cibolo, City of Schertz.
and Dietz Creek.
Approxiamtely 2,700 feet upstream of the None +766
confluence with Cibolo Tributary 16 and
Dietz Creek.
Approximately 1,000 feet downstream of None +693 Guadalupe County Uninc. Areas), City of
the intersection with Borgfield Road and Cibolo, City of Schertz.
Turncreek Avenue.
Approximately 1,100 feet NE of the inter- None +844
section of Old Weiderstein Road and
Cibolo Valley Drive.
Approximately 3,100 feet downstream of *457 +464 Guadalupe County Uninc. Areas), City of
the confluence with Geronimo Creek and Seguin.
Geronimo Tributary 2.
Approximately 2,000 feet downstream of *460 +464
the confluence with Geronimo Creek and
Geronimo Creek Tributary 2.
At confluence with Geronimo Creek and *458 +464 Guadalupe County (Uninc. Areas), City of
Guadalupe River. Seguin.
Approximately 250 feet downstream of East *587 +598
County Line Road.
Approximately 350 feet downstream of None +784 Guadalupe County (Uninc. Areas), City of
Dean Road and Town Creek. Cibolo.
Approximately 1,300 feet upstream of Dean None +814
Road and Town Creek.
At confluence with Town Creek and Town *697 +708 Guadalupe County (Uninc. Areas), City of
Creek Tributary 1. Cibolo.

At Intersection of FM 1103 Road and Brite *711 +712

Road.
Walnut Branch ........... At confluence with Walnut Branch and Gua- None +492 Guadalupe County (Uninc. Areas).
dalupe River.
Appoxiamtely 1,500 feet upstream of None +548
McQueeny Dam.

VerDate Aug<31>2005 18:57 Jun 16, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00034 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\19JNP1.SGM 19JNP1
 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 117 / Monday, June 19, 2006 / Proposed Rules 35235

GUADALUPE COUNTY, TEXAS AND INCORPORATED AREAS—Continued

Flooding source(s)
*Elevation in feet (NGVD)
+Elevation in feet (NAVD)
#Depth in feet above
Location of referenced elevation Communities affected
ground

Effective Modified

ADDRESSES:
Unincorporated Areas of Guadalupe County
Maps are available for inspection at Maintenance Building, 415 East Donegan Street, Seguin, TX 78155.
Send comments to the Honorable Donald Schraub, County Judge, Guadalupe County, County Courthouse, Seguin TX 78155.
City of Cibolo
Maps are available for inspection at 109 South Main Street, Cibolo, TX 78108.
Send comments to the Honorable Johnny Sutton, Mayor, City of Cibolo, P.O. Box 826, Cibolo, TX 78108.
City of Schertz
Maps are available for inspection at Public Works Building, 10 Commercial Place, TX 78154.
Send comments to the Honorable Hal Baldwin, Mayor, City of Schertz, 1400 Schertz Parkway, Schertz, TX 78154.
City of Seguin
Maps are available for inspection at 210 East Gonzales, Seguin, TX 78155.
Send comments to the Honorable Betty Ann Maties, Mayor, City of Seguin, P.O. Box 581, Seguin, TX 78155.
#Depth in feet above ground.
*National Geodetic Vertical Datum.
+National American Vertical Datum.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. DATES: The comment period is ninety
83.100, ‘‘Flood Insurance.’’) (90) days following the second
Dated: June 8, 2006. publication of this proposed rule in a
Michael K. Buckley, newspaper of local circulation in each
Deputy Director, Mitigation Division, Federal community.
Emergency Management Agency, Department ADDRESSES: The proposed BFEs for each
of Homeland Security. community are available for inspection
[FR Doc. E6–9518 Filed 6–16–06; 8:45 am] at the office of the Chief Executive
BILLING CODE 9110–12–P Officer of each community. The
respective addresses are listed in the
table below.
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
SECURITY Doug Bellomo, P.E., Hazard
Federal Emergency Management Identification Section, Mitigation
Agency Division, Federal Emergency
Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW.,
44 CFR Part 67 Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646–2903.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: FEMA
[Docket No. FEMA–B–7460] proposes to make determinations of
BFEs and modified BFEs for each
Proposed Flood Elevation
community listed below, in accordance
Determinations
with section 110 of the Flood Disaster
AGENCY: Federal Emergency Protection Act of 1973, 42 U.S.C. 4104,
Management Agency (FEMA), and 44 CFR 67.4(a).
Department of Homeland Security. These proposed BFEs and modified
ACTION: Proposed rule. BFEs, together with the floodplain
management criteria required by 44 CFR
SUMMARY: Technical information or 60.3, are the minimum that are required.
comments are requested on the They should not be construed to mean
proposed Base (1% annual-chance) that the community must change any
Flood Elevations (BFEs) and proposed existing ordinances that are more
BFE modifications for the communities stringent in their floodplain
listed below. The BFEs and modified management requirements. The
BFEs are the basis for the floodplain community may at any time enact
management measures that the stricter requirements of its own, or
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS
insurance premium rates for new
buildings built after these elevations are
made final, and for the contents in these
buildings.
National Environmental Policy Act.
This proposed rule is categorically
excluded from the requirements of 44
CFR part 10, Environmental
Consideration. No environmental
impact assessment has been prepared.
Regulatory Flexibility Act. The
Mitigation Division Director of the
Federal Emergency Management Agency
certifies that this proposed rule is
exempt from the requirements of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act because
proposed or modified BFEs are required
by the Flood Disaster Protection Act of
1973, 42 U.S.C. 4104, and are required
to establish and maintain community
eligibility in the NFIP. No regulatory
flexibility analysis has been prepared.
Regulatory Classification. This
proposed rule is not a significant
regulatory action under the criteria of
Section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866 of
September 30, 1993, Regulatory
Planning and Review, 58 FR 51735.
Executive Order 13132, Federalism.
This rule involves no policies that have
federalism implications under Executive
Order 13132.
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform. This rule meets the applicable
standards of Executive Order 12988.
List of Subjects in 44 CFR Part 67

community is required either to adopt pursuant to policies established by other

or to show evidence of being already in
effect in order to qualify or remain
qualified for participation in the
National Flood Insurance Program
(NFIP).
Federal, State, or regional entities.
These proposed elevations are used to
meet the floodplain management
requirements of the NFIP and are also
used to calculate the appropriate flood
Administrative practice and
procedure, Flood insurance, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements.
Accordingly, 44 CFR part 67 is
proposed to be amended as follows:

VerDate Aug<31>2005 18:57 Jun 16, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00035 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\19JNP1.SGM 19JNP1