Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Extension date:
Assessment item:
Course name:
Tutorial group:
Tuesday 2pm
Lecturer/tutor:
2b
Bachelor of
Education (Primary)
Margaret Stone
Mark
awarded:
Assessors
signature:
Date:
Contents
1. Cover
page
...1
2. Contents
page
...2
3. Introduction: Learning and teaching
context..3
4. Assessment design and
development
..3
5. Implementation of assessment
strategy...4
Whole class assessment
data.4
Feedback on students assessment work samples and
analysis5
6. Reflecting critically and stance on assessment
practice...11
Reflection on assessment design and
teaching...11
My teacher stance on
assessment.
12
7.
References
.13
8.
Appendices
14
One of the key factors that influenced the assessment approach was that each
student has different learning needs abilities. Black and William (1998, p. 140)
suggest that students needs are unpredictable and greatly vary from student to
student and as such, it is paramount that teachers understand their students
progress and difficulties so that their teaching is adapted accordingly. This would
result in the interaction between learning and teaching that was a focus in the
assessment approach. Another focus of the assessment approach was that it should
practical, effective and ultimately lead to future learning. Harlen (2010, p.30) stated
that there are certain principles which guide quality assessment, which state that
assessment should improve learning and that assessment should engage learners in
the learning and assessment process.
Assessment Design and Development
The KWL chart was chosen as the prime form of assessment throughout the five
lesson sequence as it allowed for an individual analysis of knowledge for each student
as well as providing an understanding of the students attitude towards the topic. The
initial assessment or diagnostic assessment which saw the Know and Want to know
sections of the KWL chart filled out, allowed me to draw the conclusions that the
students were quite unfamiliar with many concepts of time at that particular moment
and that some students were not particularly interested in learning about time. From
information provided in the KWL chart, I decided to focus my lessons on the basic
aspects of telling time in the first few lessons as that allowed students to learn about
the basics but also explore their wonderings about time once they had completed the
activity. The Learnt part of the KWL chart was a form of summative and formative
assessment that informed me of the students progress as well as what the next goals
should be for them whilst allowing the students to reflect on their learnings. This was
a useful way to consolidate their knowledge as well as inform future teaching and gain
an understanding of how the students learning occurred.
Table 1: Summary of Assessment Task and Criteria
Assessme Type of
Links to
Criteria
Feedback to
nt Task
KWL chart
Assessment
The KWL chart is
curriculum
The KWL chart
students
I used a 5, 4, 3, The feedback
formed the
2, 1 rubric to
assessment initially
general
charts as it
provided to
learning
allowed me to
students in the
given to students
intentions
group the
form of
to complete the
described in
students based
comments on
the lesson
on their
know columns
sequence. It
knowledge of
were discussed
before any
also provided
time which
with the
teaching occurs.
me with
then informed
students
Subsequently, the
information as
my support
individually.
to the different
and extension
levels of
groups.
knowledge that
lesson as a form of
students had
summative
about time
assessment. The
which informed
my
form of self-
support/extens
assessment.
ion groups
during the
lessons.
5
- can accurately identify
and name features of a
clock
-is able to tell time to the
minute
-has an understanding of
how to add and subtract
time/tell duration
4
- can accurately identify
and name features of a
clock
-has an understanding of
how to tell time to the
minute
-is able to add and subtract
hours and half hours
3
- can accurately identify
and name features of a
clock
From the assessment data, it is clear that more students have moved up a place in
the 5, 4, 3, 2, 1 rubric, indicating that there is a growth in learning for most students.
However, 7 out of 20 students remained in the same grouping which might indicate a
greater need for support throughout the teaching sequence. Nearly all the students
are able to tell simple times such as half-past and oclock which is a positive outcome
considering the learning objectives for three out of five lessons was on telling simple
time. Towards the end of the lesson sequence, it became apparent that there was a
greater need for extension for students in the 4 and 5 groupings. There was also a
need for support as the students in the 1 and 2 grouping made a bit of progress but
perhaps were not supported enough as 4 out of 9 students remained in the 1
grouping. The general tone of the whole class assessment data is positive as most
students have experienced a positive jump in their learning. However, I would modify
my teaching practice by including more open-ended tasks so that students at each
level can be given the same task but the level of difficulty is reduced or increased to
support or extend the different students.
choose to focus on their knowledge of oclock time while the other might choose to
focus on their knowledge of how clocks work, simply because that interests them
more. The students chose the assessment criteria to focus on in the 5, 4, 3, 2, 1 rubric
and subsequently, I used that information to guide what was taught in the lesson
sequence. Through using the KWL chart as well as inferences I had made throughout
the lessons, I was able to report to my mentor what had been learnt from the
students perspectives as well as my own. I learnt that assessment is something that
occurs naturally throughout each lesson and that it is more effective to provide
students with constant feedback instead of once at the start and again at the end. I
also realised that assessment has to be carefully constructed so as to extract targeted
information, which is most often needed in a classroom. Assessing students is not an
easy task but rather tedious especially if you take an individualised approach.
However, I believe in its necessity to inform teachers and students if teaching and
learning is to be most effective.
Reflecting critically and Stance on Assessment Practice: My Teacher Stance on
Assessment
Through implementing my assessment strategy, I have been able to develop some new ideas
about assessment as well as consolidate previous beliefs. I believe that assessment provides
students and teachers with feedback in terms of progress, misconceptions and so on and it is
that feedback that provides the connection between teaching and learning. As such
assessments main role is to provide feedback which should determine teaching and as such
student learning. Assessment is not solely for the teacher but is a tool that students should
also use to become self-sufficient monitors of their progress which is the ultimate goal. This
aligns with Rowntree (cited in Hodges, Eames and Coll 2014, p. 190) who states that
assessment prepares students for later life where they regulate and assess their own learning.
This is one important long-term goal of assessment but I also believe that in school,
assessment also has to lead to student progress. Through using a KWL chart, I could see that
student motivation was an important factor in accurately assessing the students knowledge
as most who had a negative view of time or maths as a whole tended to write minimal
information. This has the potential to skew the data and mislead my teaching which in turn
would not result in effective student learning. One main idea that I am currently wrestling with
is how to create an assessment task that involves students but also encapsulates the set
curriculum. I believe that my main views on assessment have stayed relatively similar but
rather my views on assessment planning and the role of feedback in particular have changed.
References
Black, P & Wiliam, D 1998, 'Inside the Black Box', Phi Delta Kappan, vol. 80, no. 2, p. 140,
EBSCOhost, viewed 10 June 2015.
Harlen, W 2010, What is quality teacher assessment?, Developing Teacher Assessment,
Maidenhead : McGraw-Hill Education, pp. 29-52
Hodges, D, Eames, C, & Coll, RK 2014, 'Theoretical perspectives on assessment in cooperative
education placements', Asia-Pacific Journal of Cooperative Education, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 189207.
Appendices
Appendix 1: Lesson sequence with assessment strategy overview
Lesson 1: Introduction to clocks and features of clocks (Assessment: complete K&W from KWL
chart and 5, 4, 3, 2, 1 rubric based on KWL chart)
Lesson 2: Oclock time
Lesson 3: Half past, quarter past and quarter to time
Lesson 4: Digital time (Assessment: Rubric)
Warm Up
Assessment: K&W from KWL
chart
Lesson focus: identifying
features of a clock
Class brainstorm about time on
a poster. What do we know?
What are the features of a
clock? How many minutes in a
day? Where do we see clocks?
Why do we use clocks? Which
way does a clock move?
Have iPad stopwatch displayed
on the TV using the visualiser.
Get students to predict how
many times someone can do
something in a minute. How can
we estimate a minute?
Resources: Poster paper,
markers
Student Activity
Students will make their own
clocks and decorate them.
Things that need to be included
on the clocks are: hour and
minute hand, numbers from 112, lines marking the minutes.
These clocks will be used
throughout the rest of the timebased lessons as a teaching
tool.
Resources: paper plates, colour
pencils, paper fastener,
different coloured arrows for
hour and minute hand, clocks
from maths resources for
referencing.
Support
Extension
Students can
In partners,
work with
students can
partners to
play time tic
draw clock
tac toe. Each
face and
person has to
identify
take turns in
different
asking their
features of
partner a
the clock.
question about
time. If their
partner
answers
correctly, they
place an x or
an o in the
squares. If the
students dont
get the
question right,
they miss that
turn. Students
have to ask
questions that
they know the
answer to but
might be tricky
enough for
their partner
not to know.
Eg. How many
seconds are
there in 1 min
and 23
seconds
Students will be given a blank
sheet of clock faces which they
Reflection
Students will gather
on the floor in a
circle and identify
features of their
clock such as the
minute hand or
hour hand.
Resources:
students clocks,
demonstration
clock
Students will be
chosen to share
of seconds in
12 minutes,
what it looks
like on an
analogue
clock.
Assessment: 5, 4, 3, 2, 1 Rubric
Clock puzzle: In pairs, (based
on capabilities) students will be
given a bag of jumbled clock
times where they have to
match the analogue time with
the digital time. Once matched,
students can take a picture of
each pair using their iPad and
place them in order (they can
choose to start at whichever
time)
Resources: Bag of analogue
clock faces and digital clock
faces, pencils
Support
Extension
Continuation
Once puzzles
of warm up
are completed,
activity
students can
log onto
laptops or
iPads and play
with the
interactive
clock online by
moving the
clock hands
and testing
their partner.
Assessment: L from KWL chart
Using iPads, create a Pic
Collage page that has facts
about a certain time. Eg using
7:12 as the time, students
could write how many more
minutes it is to 8, the number
of seconds in 12 minutes, what
it looks like on an analogue
clock etc.
Resources: iPad, online
interactive clock, students
clocks
Support
Extension
Work on the
Students can
floor with me
find out the
to create a
relationship
fact poster
between units
together.
of time eg.
Get 1 partnership
to share their
ordered time pairs.
What time did they
start at?
Morning/afternoon?
What might you be
doing at that time?
Recap of digital
time with the class.
What do we see
when we read
digital time?
Resources:
students clocks,
demonstration
clock
How many
(hours and)
minutes to
midnight from
7:12
oclock
oclock
oclock
oclock
12:0
0
2:00
11:3
3:30
KWL Chart
Kno
Wan
Mentor feedback
Questions/Feedback
Mentor teacher has told me not to include peer assessment but Im hoping to include students
in the assessment process instead of the actual assessing. How could I do that?
Peer: You could include a KWL chart at the start and the end, that way you could use
information straight from them to inform your teaching
Peer: You could brainstorm with students the criteria that should be included in your 5, 4, 3, 2,
1 rubric
Its not a school practice to separate students based on their year levels when teaching. Is a
rubric the best way to scale the students?
Peer: Yes, I think a rubric is best because its not about their year level but basically how they
match up to the criteria. And your idea of a 5, 4, 3, 2, 1 rubric is good because one level is not
better than the other, they have just been posed as groupings based on capabilities.
Is my assessment structure appropriate in terms of where I have started to fishbone?
Peer: I think so. Its given you enough time to deliver content but also to start separating
students out based on abilities. I wouldnt do it any sooner because I dont think there would
be enough time for students to demonstrate their capabilities and you would also want
enough time at the end to branch students out into your abilities-based groups.