Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 4

16208 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No.

62 / Friday, March 31, 2006 / Rules and Regulations

detail the scope of the Agency’s 2006–07–07 Airbus: Amendment 39–14534. (3) Airbus Repair Drawing R571–40588 or
authority. Docket No. FAA–2006–24124; R571–40942, as referenced in paragraphs (c)
We are issuing this rulemaking under Directorate Identifier 2004–NM–272–AD. and (d) of AD 98–18–02, is an AMOC for the
the authority described in subtitle VII, modification in paragraph (f) of this AD.
Effective Date
part A, subpart III, section 44701, (a) This AD becomes effective April 17, Related Information
‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that 2006. (i) French airworthiness directive 2003–
section, Congress charges the FAA with 290(B) R1, dated October 1, 2003, also
Affected ADs
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in addresses the subject of this AD.
air commerce by prescribing regulations (b) None.
Material Incorporated by Reference
for practices, methods, and procedures Applicability
the Administrator finds necessary for (j) You must use Airbus Service Bulletin
(c) This AD applies to A300 B4–600, B4– A300–57–6027, Revision 06, dated March 2,
safety in air commerce. This regulation 600R, and F4–600R series airplanes, and 2005; and Airbus Service Bulletin A300–57–
is within the scope of that authority Model C4–605R variant F airplanes 6033, Revision 01, dated December 18, 2003;
because it addresses an unsafe condition (collectively called A300–600 series as applicable; to perform the actions that are
that is likely to exist or develop on airplanes); certificated in any category; required by this AD, unless the AD specifies
products identified in this rulemaking except those on which Airbus Modification otherwise. The Director of the Federal
8608 or 8609 is incorporated.
action. Register approved the incorporation by
Unsafe Condition reference of these documents in accordance
Regulatory Findings with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(d) This AD results from reports of cracking
We have determined that this AD will in the vertical web of the center spar sealing Contact Airbus, 1 Rond Point Maurice
not have federalism implications under angles of the wing earlier than the inspection Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France, for a
interval specified in AD 98–18–02, copy of this service information. You may
Executive Order 13132. This AD will review copies at the Docket Management
not have a substantial direct effect on amendment 39–10718. We are issuing this
AD to prevent crack formation in the sealing Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation,
the States, on the relationship between 400 Seventh Street SW., room PL–401, Nassif
angles; such cracks could rupture the sealing
the national government and the States, angle and lead to subsequent crack formation Building, Washington, DC; on the Internet at
or on the distribution of power and in the bottom skin of the wing, and resultant http://dms.dot.gov; or at the National
responsibilities among the various reduced structural integrity of the center spar Archives and Records Administration
levels of government. section of the wing. (NARA). For information on the availability
For the reasons discussed above, I of this material at the NARA, call (202) 741–
Compliance 6030, or go to http://www.archives.gov/
certify that the regulation:
(e) You are responsible for having the federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
actions required by this AD performed within ibr_locations.html.
action’’ under Executive Order 12866; the compliance times specified, unless the
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the Issued in Renton, Washington, on March
actions have already been done.
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures 15, 2006.
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and Modification Kalene C. Yanamura,
3. Will not have a significant (f) Within 500 flight cycles after the Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
economic impact, positive or negative, effective date of this AD: Modify nine bolt Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
on a substantial number of small entities holes in the vertical flange of the center spar [FR Doc. 06–3063 Filed 3–30–06; 8:45 am]
sealing angles outboard of rib 8, adjacent to
under the criteria of the Regulatory the pylon attachment fitting, and do any BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
Flexibility Act. applicable related investigative and
We prepared a regulatory evaluation corrective actions before further flight; by
of the estimated costs to comply with doing all the actions in and in accordance DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
this AD and placed it in the AD docket. with the Accomplishment Instructions of
See the ADDRESSES section for a location Airbus Service Bulletin A300–57–6033, Federal Aviation Administration
to examine the regulatory evaluation. Revision 01, dated December 18, 2003. If any
crack is found during the related 14 CFR Part 39
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 investigative action: Before further flight,
repair in accordance with the [Docket No. FAA–2005–22062; Directorate
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus Identifier 2003–NM–219–AD; Amendment
safety, Incorporation by reference, Service Bulletin A300–57–6027, Revision 06, 39–14538; AD 2006–07–11]
Safety. dated March 2, 2005.
RIN 2120–AA64
Adoption of the Amendment No Reporting Required
(g) Although Airbus Service Bulletin Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell
■ Accordingly, under the authority A300–57–6033, Revision 01, dated December Douglas Model DC–9–81 (MD–81), DC–
delegated to me by the Administrator, 18, 2003, specifies to report crack findings to 9–82 (MD–82), DC–9–83 (MD–83), DC–
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as the manufacturer, this AD does not include 9–87 (MD–87), MD–88, and MD–90–30
follows: that requirement. Airplanes
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS Alternative Methods of Compliance AGENCY: Federal Aviation
(AMOCs) Administration (FAA), Department of
DIRECTIVES
(h)(1) The Manager, International Branch, Transportation (DOT).
■ 1. The authority citation for part 39 ANM–116, Transport Airplane Directorate, ACTION: Final rule.
continues to read as follows: FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs
for this AD, if requested in accordance with SUMMARY: The FAA is adopting a new
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. airworthiness directive (AD) for all
hsrobinson on PROD1PC61 with RULES

§ 39.13 [Amended] (2) Before using any AMOC approved in


accordance with § 39.19 on any airplane to
McDonnell Douglas airplanes identified
■ 2. The Federal Aviation which the AMOC applies, notify the above. This AD requires a one-time
Administration (FAA) amends § 39.13 appropriate principal inspector in the FAA inspection of the aft attach fitting
by adding the following new Flight Standards Certificate Holding District assembly of the spoiler link to
airworthiness directive (AD): Office. determine the part number, and further

VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:51 Mar 30, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00016 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\31MRR1.SGM 31MRR1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 62 / Friday, March 31, 2006 / Rules and Regulations 16209

investigative action and replacement of investigative action and replacement of ATA nor Delta state a technical
the assembly with a new or serviceable the assembly with a new or serviceable justification for the request.
assembly, if necessary. This AD results assembly, if necessary. We do not concur. There are no data
from a determination that the holes of available to determine the damage
Comments tolerance characteristics of the subject
certain aft attach fitting assemblies of
the spoiler link were not cold-worked We provided the public the parts. Thus, we cannot be sure that
during production. We are issuing this opportunity to participate in the repetitive inspections of an affected part
AD to prevent fatigue cracking of the aft development of this AD. We have would ensure an adequate level of
attach fitting of the spoiler link and considered the comments received. safety. We note that the compliance
consequent failure of the fitting. Failure time of 10,000 total flight hours on the
Request To Address Illegible Part aft attach fitting assembly of the spoiler
of the fitting could result in an
Numbers link, or 18 months after the effective
asymmetrical lift condition and
consequent reduced controllability of Midwest Airlines (MAL) is concerned date of this AD, whichever is later,
the airplane. about the possibility that operators may should allow the majority of operators
DATES: This AD becomes effective May not be able to determine the part to comply with the requirements of this
5, 2006. number on the subject parts. The parts AD at a scheduled maintenance visit. In
The Director of the Federal Register manufacturer used an ‘‘Ink Stamp’’ addition, we have determined from the
approved the incorporation by reference method of marking the parts, and the parts manufacturer that an adequate
of a certain publication listed in the AD parts are dimensionally the same as supply of replacement parts exists to
as of May 5, 2006. parts produced by the original support replacing affected parts during
equipment manufacturer. Thus, the a scheduled maintenance visit within
ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD
stamped part number is the only way to the compliance time. We have not
docket on the Internet at http://
identify affected parts. MAL points out changed the AD in this regard. However,
dms.dot.gov or in person at the Docket
that that the stamped part number wears operators may request approval of an
Management Facility, U.S. Department
and washes off of parts, making it alternative method of compliance
of Transportation, 400 Seventh Street
impossible to identify an affected part. (AMOC) for the replacement in
SW., Nassif Building, room PL–401,
MAL notes that a cursory look at accordance with paragraph (i)(1) of this
Washington, DC.
Contact Aerotech Engineering, Inc., airplanes in its fleet revealed that the AD. The request must include data
19655 Descartes, Foothill Ranch, part number on some of its airplanes is substantiating that the AMOC would
California 92610; for service information no longer legible. MAL believes that all provide an acceptable level of safety.
identified in this AD. unmarked parts would have to be Request To Expand Applicability
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: changed to ensure that all discrepant
MAL is concerned about the
Roger Durbin, Aerospace Engineer, parts are removed from service.
possibility that the subject aft attach
Airframe Branch, ANM–120L, Los We agree that some clarification is fitting assemblies of the spoiler link may
Angeles Aircraft Certification Office, necessary. While determining the be installed on other McDonnell
FAA, 3960 Paramount Boulevard, stamped part number is the only Douglas Model DC–9 airplanes (e.g.,
Lakewood, California 90712–4137; immediate way to identify an affected Model DC–9–10, –20, –30, –40, or –50
telephone (562) 627–5233; fax (562) part, a review of maintenance and series airplanes).
627–5210. purchasing records may also assist in We acknowledge MAL’s concern, but
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: determining whether an affected part is note that the Parts Manufacturing
installed. We agree that any part on Authority (PMA) supplement limits the
Examining the Docket which the part number and/or lot installation of the subject parts to
You may examine the airworthiness number cannot be conclusively McDonnell Douglas Model DC–9–81
directive (AD) docket on the Internet at determined must be replaced to ensure (MD–81), DC–9–82 (MD–82), DC–9–83
http://dms.dot.gov or in person at the that all discrepant parts are removed (MD–83), DC–9–87 (MD–87), MD–88,
Docket Management Facility office from service. Therefore, we have revised and MD–90–30 airplanes. Thus, the
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday paragraph (f)(2) and (g) of this AD to subject parts are not installed on any
through Friday, except Federal holidays. clarify what actions are required if the airplane models other than these. We
The Docket Management Facility office part number and/or lot number cannot have not changed the AD in this regard.
(telephone (800) 647–5227) is located on be determined. Also, we have revised
the plaza level of the Nassif Building at paragraph (f) and (f)(2) of this AD to Request To Include Replacement Cost
the street address stated in the clarify that a review of maintenance MAL, ATA, and Delta request that we
ADDRESSES section. records is an acceptable means of revise the Costs of Compliance section
determining a part number. of the proposed AD to include the cost
Discussion of labor and parts associated with
Request To Allow Repetitive
The FAA issued a notice of proposed replacing the aft attach fitting assembly
Inspections in Lieu of Immediate
rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR of the spoiler link. Delta notes that the
Replacement
part 39 to include an AD that would proposed AD doesn’t include any
apply to all McDonnell Douglas Model The Air Transport Association (ATA), analysis of the cost of replacement if a
DC–9–81 (MD–81), DC–9–82 (MD–82), on behalf of its member, Delta Airlines subject assembly is installed. Delta
DC–9–83 (MD–83), DC–9–87 (MD–87), (Delta), requests that we revise the believes that this information should be
MD–88, and MD–90–30 airplanes. That proposed AD to allow an affected part provided to operators.
NPRM was published in the Federal to be repetitively inspected in lieu of We do not concur. We acknowledge
hsrobinson on PROD1PC61 with RULES

Register on August 11, 2005 (70 FR requiring replacement of any identified that replacing an affected assembly
46790). That NPRM proposed to require affected part before further flight. ATA would take approximately 5 work hours,
a one-time inspection of the aft attach and Delta state that this would allow the the cost of necessary parts would be
fitting assembly of the spoiler link to replacement to be scheduled and done $350, and that there are approximately
determine the part number, and further during a maintenance visit. Neither 134 affected parts that were produced

VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:51 Mar 30, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00017 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\31MRR1.SGM 31MRR1
16210 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 62 / Friday, March 31, 2006 / Rules and Regulations

and sold. However, the economic because it addresses an unsafe condition 87), MD–88, and MD–90–30 airplanes,
analysis of an AD is limited to the cost that is likely to exist or develop on certificated in any category.
of actions that are actually required by products identified in this rulemaking Unsafe Condition
the AD—in this case, the inspection to action.
(d) This AD was prompted by a
determine if a part is affected. The determination that the holes of certain aft
Regulatory Findings
economic analysis does not consider the attach fitting assemblies of the spoiler link
costs of conditional actions, such as We have determined that this AD will
were not cold-worked during production. We
replacing a part that is found to be not have federalism implications under are issuing this AD to prevent fatigue
affected. Such conditional actions Executive Order 13132. This AD will cracking of the aft attach fitting of the spoiler
would be required—regardless of AD not have a substantial direct effect on link and consequent failure of the fitting.
direction—to correct an unsafe the States, on the relationship between Failure of the fitting could result in an
condition identified in an airplane and the national government and the States, asymmetrical lift condition and consequent
to ensure that the airplane is operated or on the distribution of power and reduced controllability of the airplane.
in an airworthy condition, as required responsibilities among the various
Compliance
by the Federal Aviation Regulations. We levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I (e) You are responsible for having the
have not changed the AD in this regard.
certify that this AD: actions required by this AD performed within
Clarification of AMOC Paragraph (1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory the compliance times specified, unless the
action’’ under Executive Order 12866; actions have already been done.
We have revised this action to clarify
the appropriate procedure for notifying (2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under Inspection
the principal inspector before using any DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (f) Prior to the accumulation of 10,000 total
approved AMOC on any airplane to (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and flight hours on the aft attach fitting assembly
which the AMOC applies. (3) Will not have a significant of the spoiler link, or within 18 months after
economic impact, positive or negative, the effective date of this AD, whichever is
Conclusion on a substantial number of small entities later: Inspect the aft attach fitting assembly
We have carefully reviewed the under the criteria of the Regulatory of the spoiler link to determine the part
available data, including the comments Flexibility Act. number, in accordance with Item 1.a). of
received, and determined that air safety We prepared a regulatory evaluation Section 1.D., ‘‘Description,’’ of Aerotech
and the public interest require adopting of the estimated costs to comply with Manufacturing Service Bulletin DC9–27–01–
the AD with the changes described this AD and placed it in the AD docket. AMI5139, Revision ‘‘A,’’ dated June 19, 2003.
previously. We have determined that See the ADDRESSES section for a location A review of airplane maintenance records is
to examine the regulatory evaluation. acceptable in lieu of this inspection if the
these changes will neither increase the
part number of the assembly can be
economic burden on any operator nor List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 conclusively determined from that review.
increase the scope of the AD. (1) If the part number is not AMI3954558–
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
Costs of Compliance safety, Incorporation by reference, 1 or AMI3954558–501: No further action is
Safety. required by this AD, but the provisions of
There are about 1,296 airplanes of the paragraph (h) of this AD continue to apply.
affected design in the worldwide fleet. Adoption of the Amendment (2) If the part number is AMI3954558–1 or
This AD will affect about 738 airplanes AMI3954558–501, or if the part number
of U.S. registry. The inspection to ■ Accordingly, under the authority cannot be conclusively determined: Before
determine the part number of the aft delegated to me by the Administrator, further flight, inspect the aft attach fitting
attach fitting assembly of the spoiler the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as assembly of the spoiler link to determine the
link will take about 1 work hour per follows: lot number, then determine if the lot number
airplane, at an average labor rate of $65 is identified in the ‘‘Lot Number’’ column of
per work hour. Based on these figures, PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS the table in Section 1.A.1. of the service
the estimated cost of this inspection for DIRECTIVES bulletin. If the lot number is not identified
U.S. operators is $47,970, or $65 per in the service bulletin, no further action is
■ 1. The authority citation for part 39 required by this AD, but the provisions of
airplane. continues to read as follows: paragraph (h) of this AD continue to apply.
Authority for This Rulemaking Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. A review of airplane maintenance records is
acceptable in lieu of this inspection if the lot
Title 49 of the United States Code § 39.13 [Amended] number of the assembly can be conclusively
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue ■ 2. The Federal Aviation determined from that review.
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Administration (FAA) amends § 39.13
section 106, describes the authority of Replacement
by adding the following new
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, airworthiness directive (AD): (g) If the part number of the aft attach
Aviation Programs, describes in more fitting assembly of the spoiler link is
detail the scope of the Agency’s 2006–07–11 McDonnell Douglas: AMI3954558–1 or AMI3954558–501, and the
Amendment 39–14538. Docket No. lot number is identified in the ‘‘Lot Number’’
authority. FAA–2005–22062; Directorate Identifier
We are issuing this rulemaking under column of the table in Section 1.A.1. of
2003–NM–219–AD. Aerotech Manufacturing Service Bulletin
the authority described in subtitle VII,
part A, subpart III, section 44701, Effective Date DC9–27–01–AMI5139, Revision ‘‘A,’’ dated
‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that (a) This AD becomes effective May 5, 2006. June 19, 2003, or if the part number and/or
lot number cannot be conclusively
section, Congress charges the FAA with Affected ADs determined: Before further flight, replace the
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
hsrobinson on PROD1PC61 with RULES

(b) None. assembly with a new or serviceable assembly


air commerce by prescribing regulations having a lot number that is not identified in
for practices, methods, and procedures Applicability the ‘‘Lot Number’’ column of the table in
the Administrator finds necessary for (c) This AD applies to all McDonnell Section 1.A.1. of the service bulletin, in
safety in air commerce. This regulation Douglas Model DC–9–81 (MD–81), DC–9–82 accordance with Item 1.b). of Section 1.D.,
is within the scope of that authority (MD–82), DC–9–83 (MD–83), DC–9–87 (MD– ‘‘Description,’’ of the service bulletin.

VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:51 Mar 30, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00018 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\31MRR1.SGM 31MRR1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 62 / Friday, March 31, 2006 / Rules and Regulations 16211

Parts Installation DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Examining the Docket


(h) As of the effective date of this AD, no You may examine the airworthiness
person may install, on any airplane, an aft Federal Aviation Administration directive (AD) docket on the Internet at
attach fitting assembly of the spoiler link http://dms.dot.gov or in person at the
having part number AMI3954558–1 or 14 CFR Part 39 Docket Management Facility office
AMI3954558–501, and having a lot number between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
[Docket No. FAA–2005–20918; Directorate
identified in the ‘‘Lot Number’’ column of the through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Identifier 2004–NM–269–AD; Amendment
table in Section 1.A.1. of Aerotech 39–14539; AD 2006–07–12] The Docket Management Facility office
Manufacturing Service Bulletin DC9–27–01- (telephone (800) 647–5227) is located on
AMI5139, Revision ‘‘A,’’ dated June 19, 2003. RIN 2120–AA64 the plaza level of the Nassif Building at
Alternative Methods of Compliance the street address stated in the
Airworthiness Directives; Boeing ADDRESSES section.
(AMOCs)
Model 737–100, –200, –200C, –300,
(i)(1) The Manager, Los Angeles Aircraft –400, and –500 Series Airplanes Discussion
Certification Office, FAA, has the authority to The FAA issued a notice of proposed
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested in AGENCY: Federal Aviation
rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
accordance with the procedures found in 14 Administration (FAA), Department of
part 39 to include an AD that would
CFR 39.19. Transportation (DOT).
apply to all Boeing Model 737–100,
(2) Before using any AMOC approved in ACTION: Final rule. –200, –200C, –300, –400, and –500
accordance with 14 CFR 39.19 on any series airplanes. That NPRM was
airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify SUMMARY: The FAA is adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for all published in the Federal Register on
the appropriate principal inspector in the April 29, 2005 (70 FR 22272). That
FAA Flight Standards Certificate Holding Boeing Model 737–100, –200, –200C,
NPRM proposed to require a one-time
District Office. –300, –400, and –500 series airplanes.
inspection for scribe lines and cracks in
This AD requires a one-time inspection
Material Incorporated by Reference the fuselage skin at certain lap joints,
for scribe lines and cracks in the
(j) You must use Aerotech Manufacturing butt joints, external repair doublers, and
fuselage skin at certain lap joints, butt
Service Bulletin DC9–27–01–AMI5139, other areas; and related investigative/
joints, external repair doublers, and
Revision ‘‘A,’’ dated June 19, 2003; to corrective actions if necessary.
other areas; and related investigative/
perform the actions that are required by this corrective actions if necessary. This AD Comments
AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise. The results from reports of fuselage skin We provided the public the
Director of the Federal Register approved the cracks adjacent to the skin lap joints on opportunity to participate in the
incorporation by reference of this document airplanes that had scribe lines. Scribe development of this AD. We have
in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR line damage can also occur at many
part 51. Contact Aerotech Engineering, Inc.,
considered the comments received.
other locations, including butt joints,
19655 Descartes, Foothill Ranch, California external doublers, door scuff plates, the Support for Proposed AD
92610; for a copy of this service information. wing-to-body fairing, and areas of the One commenter (AWAS Aviation
You may review copies at the Docket fuselage where decals have been applied Services) agrees that fatigue cracks on
Management Facility, U.S. Department of or removed. We are issuing this AD to the fuselage should be addressed in a
Transportation, 400 Seventh Street, SW., prevent rapid decompression of the suitable time period. The commenter
room PL–401, Nassif Building, Washington, airplane due to fatigue cracks resulting considers the proposed compliance time
DC; on the Internet at http://dms.dot.gov; or
from scribe lines on pressurized acceptable.
at the National Archives and Records
fuselage structure.
Administration (NARA). For information on Request To Consider Similar
the availability of this material at the NARA, DATES: This AD becomes effective May Rulemaking for Other Airplanes
call (202) 741–6030, or go to http:// 5, 2006.
The Director of the Federal Register The National Transportation Safety
www.archives.gov/federal_register/ Board (NTSB) believes that the
code_of_federal_regulations/ approved the incorporation by reference
of a certain publication listed in the AD proposed AD will address scribe-type
ibr_locations.html.
as of May 5, 2006. damage on the affected airplanes in a
Issued in Renton, Washington, on March timely manner. However, the NTSB is
ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD
17, 2006. concerned that this type of damage is
docket on the Internet at http://
Ali Bahrami, not limited to those airplanes, but could
dms.dot.gov or in person at the Docket
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, be present on virtually every
Management Facility, U.S. Department
Aircraft Certification Service. pressurized airplane currently in
of Transportation, 400 Seventh Street,
[FR Doc. 06–3064 Filed 3–30–06; 8:45 am] service. The NTSB urges the FAA to
SW., Nassif Building, room PL–401,
examine similar rulemaking for other
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P Washington, DC.
makes and models of pressurized
Contact Boeing Commercial
airplanes.
Airplanes, PO Box 3707, Seattle, We acknowledge the NTSB’s
Washington 98124–2207, for service concerns. This is a long-term durability
information identified in this AD. issue that is not limited to any
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sue particular aircraft model. The effect on
Lucier, Aerospace Engineer, Airframe each aircraft model will vary with each
Branch, ANM–120S, FAA, Seattle model’s design characteristics and the
hsrobinson on PROD1PC61 with RULES

Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), 1601 conditions to which they may be


Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington operated. In support of this, we have
98055–4056; telephone (425) 917–6438; been in contact with other governing
fax (425) 917–6590. regulatory agencies and other
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: manufacturers, and we may consider

VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:51 Mar 30, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00019 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\31MRR1.SGM 31MRR1

Оценить