Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
11.
2 | Page
17.
18. After the verification of certificates are over and once the interview
has commenced you will be taken to the board by the assistants for
the interview. You will be asked to sit in front of the board room for 2
3 minutes.
19. Non verbal Messages: Non- verbal language speaks larger than
words. As you walk in the interview room, here are a few things that
you must keep in mind.
20.
3 | Page
4 | Page
6 | Page
42. In your present job, what approach do you take to get your people
together to establish a common approach to a problem?
43. What approach do you take in getting your people to accept your ideas
or department goals?
44. How do you get people who do not want to work together to establish
a common approach to a problem?
45. Do you feel you work more effectively on a one to one basis or in a
group situation?
46. Would you rather write a report or give a verbal report? Why?
47. Why did you choose this career?
48. Tell us something about your family background
49. Tell us about the problems in your hometown. What are the solutions
to those problems?
50. Tell us about the headlines in the newspaper you have read today?
7 | Page
fy;tpj;jFjp>
Ntiyg;
ghh;f;fpd;w
elg;G epfo;Tfs;
- mbg;gilf; Nfs;tpfs;
- (c.k;. tzpftpay; bfphp gbj;jth;fSf;fhd Nfs;tpfs;
1. What is book keeping?
2. What is trial balance?
3. What is balance-sheet?
4. What are the duties of the Auditor?
Ans: The verification of assets and liabilities
V.
jw;Nghija gzp
vjph;fhyg; gzp
ii.
iii.
me;jg;
gzpapd;
Jiwf;fhd
gbepiy
mikg;G
(hierarchy)
iv.
1. tptrhak;
2. njhopw;rhiyfs;
3. ePh;g;ghrdk;
4. mizf;fl;Lfs;
9 | Page
vd;d?
5. Rw;wyhj; jyq;fs;
6. gz;ghL (tpohf;fs; Kjypa ....)
7. Kf;fpa kw;Wk; Gfo;tha;e;j egh;fs;
8. Kf;fpa Nfhtpy;fs;> Njthyaq;fs; kw;Wk; k#jpfs;
(c.k;) tpUJefh; khtl;lk;
i.
tpUJefhpy;
cs;s
Kf;fpar;re;ij
(gyruf;Fg;
nghUl;fSf;fhdJ) jkpo;ehl;by; Fwpg;gplj;jFe;j xd;whFk;. (kw;w
Kf;fpar; re;ij: nghs;shr;rp MFk;)
ii.
iii.
iv.
v.
vi.
jkpo;ehl;by;
cs;s
xNu
gid
Muha;r;rp
epiyak;
jpUtpy;ypg;Gj;J}hpy; cs;sJ.
vii.
10 | Page
nghJ
gjpy;fs;
eL
cly; nkhop
1. Neh;Kfj; Njh;tpd; NghJ> ehw;fhypapy; mkUk; NghJ KOtJkhf
cl;fhu Ntz;Lk;.
(ehw;fhypapd; Edpapy; cl;fhuf; $lhJ)
(ehw;fhypapy; KOtJkhf mkh;e;J kpfTk; rha;thf J}q;Ffpw khjphp
,Uf;ff; $lhJ)
2. Neh;Kfj; Njh;tpd; NghJ> ehw;fhypapy; ekJ KJF tisT
,y;yhky;> Neuhf mkh;;e;J ,Uf;f Ntz;Lk;. (without bent)
13 | Page
Now, Redesignated as
Commissioner
Commissioner
Joint Commissioner
Additional Commissioner
Deputy Commissioner
Joint Commissioner
Assistant Commissioner
Deputy Commissioner
Assistant Commissioner
Department of Registration
Registration department is functioning from the year 1865.
The department is providing a valuable and important service to the
public in registering documents of sale, lease, mortgage, will etc
involving transfer of immovable properties like land and buildings.
The registration of the documents gives legal status for the transactions.
The department is levying and collecting stamp duty on the market
value of the immovable property involved in the transaction.
Registration fee is also collected for the service rendered by the
department in the registration of the documents.
14 | Page
Administrative Hierarchy:
Inspector general of registration
15 | Page
Department of labour
Organization
The labor department is functioning under the administrative
control of the labour and employment department in the secretariat. The
commissioner of labour is the head of the department.
Organization set up:
Commissioner of labour
Additional Commissioner of labour
Joint Commissioner of labour
Deputy Commissioner of labour
Assistant Commissioner of labour, Labour officer,
Inspector of Plantations
Deputy Commercial Tax Officer
Commercial Tax Officer
Inspector of labour
Deputy Inspector of labour
Assistant Inspectors labour
16 | Page
REVENUE DEPARTMENT
Chief Secretary
Revenue Secretary
Commissioner of Revenue
Administration
District Collector
Deputy Tahsildar
Revenue Inspector
Village Administrative
Officer
17 | Page
IMPORTANT TOPICS
Kaveri River water dispute
This article includes a list of references, but its sources remain unclear
because
it
has
insufficient
inline
citations.
Please help to improve this article by introducing more precise citations
where appropriate. (March 2009)
Kaveri river flows in South Karnataka and then to Tamil Nadu.
The sharing of waters of the river Kaveri had been the bone of contention of a serious conflict
between the Indian states of Karnataka and Tamil Nadu. The genesis of this disparity, itself, lies
in two controversial agreements, one signed in 1892 and another in 1924, between the Madras
Presidency and the Princely State of Mysore.
The state of Karnataka feels that it has not got its due share of water utilization viv a vis Tamil
Nadu. Karnataka claims that these agreements were skewed heavily in favour of the Madras
Presidency, and has since demanded a renegotiated settlement based on "equitable sharing of the
waters". Tamil Nadu, on the other hand, pleads that it has already developed almost
3,000,000 acres (12,000 km2) of land and as a result has come to depend very heavily on the
existing pattern of usage. Any change in this pattern, it says, will adversely affect the livelihood
of millions of farmers in the state.
Decades of negotiations between the parties bore no fruit. The Government of India then
constituted a tribunal in 1990 to look into the matter. After hearing arguments of all the parties
involved for the last 16 years, the tribunal delivered its final verdict on 5 February 2007. In its
verdict, the tribunal allocated 419 billion ft (12 km) of water annually to Tamil Nadu and 270
billion ft (7.6 km) to Karnataka; 30 billion ft (0.8 km) of Kaveri river water to Kerala and 7
billion ft (0.2 km) to Puducherry. The dispute however, seems far from over with all four states
deciding to file review petitions seeking clarifications and possible renegotiation of the order.
Karnataka
34,273
(42%)
Drought area in the basin 21,870
(in km)
(63.8%)
Contribution of state (in
billion ft according to 425 (53.7%)
Ktaka)
Contribution of state (in
392 (52.9%)
billion ft according to
Basin Area (in km)
18 | Page
Tamil
Nadu
44,016
(54%)
12,790
(29.2%)
Kerala
Pondicherry Total
2,866
(3.5%)
148(-)
81,155
--
--
34,660
252
(31.8%)
113
(14.3%)
790
222
(30%)
126
(17%)
740
TN)
Quantity demanded
each state
Share for each state
per TN's demand
Share for each state
per tribunal verdict
2007
by
as
465 (41%)
177 (24%)
as
of 270 (37%)
566
(50%)
566
(76%)
419
(58%)
1140.3
5 (1%)
748
30 (4%) 7 (1%)
726
Contents
19 | Page
Mysore's plans to revive the irrigation projects met with resistance from the Madras Presidency.
Mysore state made a representation to the then British government; as a result of which, a
conference was held in 1890 with the objective of agreeing "on the principles of a modus
vivendi, which would on the one hand allow to Mysore reasonable freedom in dealing with her
irrigation works, and on the other, give to Madras practical security against injury to her
interests" and eventually the Agreement of 1892 was signed. Karnataka deems this agreement as
having been between unequal partners because, while Mysore state was a princely state, Madras
formed a part of the British Raj. Karnataka also considers this agreement to have been severely
inimical to its interests as it gave sweeping powers and prescriptive rights to Madras, the lower
riparian state. As per this agreement, Mysore was required to obtain Madras' consent for any
new irrigation reservoirs across any of the main rivers it wished to utilize and share information
on any new irrigation scheme it wished to undertake to utilize the waters
Things came to a head in 1910 when Mysore, under Nalvadi Krishnaraja Wodeyar as the king
and Sir. M.Vishweshwariah as Chief Engineer came up with a plan to construct a dam at
Kannambadi village to hold up to 41.5 TMC of water. The dam was planned to be built in two
stages. In the first stage a capacity of 11 TMC was envisioned, while in the second stage the full
capacity was set to be realized. Madras however, refused to give its consent for this move as it
had its own plans to build a storage dam at Mettur with a capacity of 80 TMC.
After a reference to the Government of India, permission was accorded to Mysore, but for a
reduced storage of 11TMC. During construction, however, the foundation was laid to suit the
earlier desired full storage. This raised Madras' hackles and the dispute continued. As a result,
the then British Government of India referred the matter to arbitration under Rule IV of the 1892
Agreement. The Cauvery dispute thus had come up for arbitration for the first time.
Sir H D Griffin was appointed arbitrator and M. Nethersole, the Inspector General of Irrigation in
India, was made the Assessor. They entered into proceedings on 16 July 1913 and the Award was
given on 12 May 1914. The award upheld the earlier decision of the Government of India and
allowed Mysore to go ahead with the construction of the dam up to 11 TMC.
The agreement also stipulated that Mysore was not to increase its area under irrigation more
than 110,000 acres (450 km2) beyond what was already existing, while the same cap for Madras
Presidency was pegged at 301000|acre|km2. Nonetheless, Madras still appealed against the
award and negotiations continued. Eventually an agreement was arrived at in 1924 and a couple
of minor agreements were also signed in 1929 and 1933. The 1924 agreement was set to lapse
after a run of 50 years. As a result of these agreements, Karnataka claims that Mysore was forced
to give up rights.
20 | Page
All these changes further changed the equations as Kerala and Pondicherry also jumped into the
fray. Kerala staked its claim as one of the major tributaries of the Kaveri, the Kabini, now
originated in Kerala. Karaikal region of Pondicherry at the tail end of the river demanded the
waters that it had always used for drinking and some minimal agriculture. While these
additional claims complicated matters greatly at a technical level, Mysore state and Tamil Nadu
still remained the major parties to the dispute.
By the late 1960s, both states and the Central government began to realize the gravity of the
situation as the 50 year run of the 1924 agreement was soon coming to an end. Negotiations were
started in right earnest and discussions continued for almost 10 years.
1970s
While discussions continued, a Cauvery Fact Finding Committee (CFFC) was constituted. The
brief of the CFFC was to inspect the ground realities and come up with a report. The CFFC
came up with a preliminary report in 1972 and a final report in 1973. Inter state discussions were
held based on this report. Finally in 1974, a draft agreement which also provided for the creation
of a Cauvery Valley Authority was prepared by the Ministry of Irrigation. This draft however,
was not ratified.
While all these discussions went on, Tamil Nadus irrigated lands had grown from a pre-Mettur
command area of 1,440,000 acres (5,800 km2) to 2,580,000 acres (10,400 km2) while Karnatakas
irrigated area stood at 680,000 acres (2,800 km). Karnataka maintains that these figures
demonstrate the lop-sided nature of the agreement
In 1976, after a series of discussions between the two states and the Central government chaired
by Jagjeevan Ram, the then Irrigation Minister, a final draft was prepared based on findings of
the CFFC. This draft was accepted by all states and the Government also made an announcement
to that effect in Parliament. Tamil Nadu came under Presidents rule soon after that and the
agreement was put on the backburner. When Presidents rule was lifted, the All India Anna
Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (AIADMK) with M. G. Ramachandran at the helm came to power
for the first time in Tamil Nadu and the dispute took a new turn.
The Tamil Nadu government now rejected the draft agreement and started insisting that the 1924
agreement had only provided for an extension and not a review. It began insisting that status quo
be restored and everyone go back to the agreements of 1892 and 1924. This however, did not cut
ice with Karnataka which had throughout maintained that those agreements were partisan and
had been signed between unequal partners.
When Karnataka began construction of the Harangi dam at Kushalanagara in Kodagu, it was
once again met with resistance from Tamil Nadu. Tamil Nadu went to court demanding the
constitution of a Tribunal under the Inter State Water Disputes Act(ISWD) of 1956. It also
demanded the immediate stoppage of construction work at the dam site. As a result of Tamil
Nadus protests, Karnataka had to fund the construction under the non-plan head and this led to
a severe strain on its finances.
21 | Page
1980s
Later Tamil Nadu withdrew its case demanding the constitution of a tribunal and the two states
started negotiating again. Several rounds of discussions were held in the 80s. The result was still,
a stalemate. In 1986, a farmers association from Tanjavur in Tamil Nadu moved the Supreme
Court demanding the constitution of a tribunal. While this case was still pending, the two states
continued many rounds of talks. This continued till April 1990 and yet yielded no results.
22 | Page
down, mostly centered in the Tamil populated parts of Bangalore, lasted for nearly a month and
most schools and educational institutions in Bangalore remained closed during this period.
23 | Page
the interim award and release to Tamil Nadu its proportionate share. Karnataka on the other
hand stated that the water levels were hardly enough to meet its own demands and ruled out
releasing any water in the circumstances that prevailed.
Demonstrations
The flare up had by now, well and truly taken an ugly turn and there were accusations and
counter accusations being thrown all around in both states. The opposition parties in Tamil Nadu
too had jumped into the fray and at the same time joining Jayalalitha in stinging rebukes of both
the Centre and the CRA.
To add to all this, the dispute had already spilled onto the streets in the district of Mandya in
Karnataka and was threatening to spread to other parts of the state too. Precipitating the matters
on the streets, the SC ordered Karnataka on 3 October to comply with the CRA and resume the
release of water.
Karnataka once again refused to obey the orders of SC. Tamil Nadu slapped another contempt
petition on Karnataka and soon the issue degenerated into a 'free for all' with all and sundry
from both states joining the protests. Soon, film actors and various other cross sections of society
from both states were on the streets. The belligerence soon hit a crescendo and even as some
groups in Tamil Nadu called for a stoppage of power from the Neyveli Power station to
Karnataka as a tit-for-tat measure, a Pan-Tamil militant outfit (a month or so later) went ahead
and blasted a major power transformer supplying power to the neighbouring states of Karnataka
24 | Page
and Andhra Pradesh.The Karnataka Chief Minister, Mr. S. M. Krishna on the other hand, fearing
that the situation might spiral out of control, embarked on a padayatra from Bangalore to
Mandya. While some saw this as merely a gimmick, some, like U R Ananthamurthy saw it as a
good faith effort to soothe tempers and joined him in the yatra.
20032006
25 | Page
However the other two assistant judges on the 3-man adjudication team, overruled the opinion of
the main Judge. And all this was done in a packed courtroom and this led to petty bickering and
heated arguments between the three judges in the packed courtroom. This left everyone in the
courtroom shocked and the Tamil Nadu counsel was moved to remark that it was embarrassing
that the judges probably needed help settling their own disputes before adjudicating on the
dispute at hand. Nonetheless, the new expert committee was formed and carried out further
assessments. Subsequently, the extended deadline of the tribunal also passed and the tribunal
was given yet another extension.
Judgment
The Cauvery Water Disputes Tribunal announced its final verdict on 5 February 2007. According
to its verdict, Tamil Nadu gets 419 billion ft (12 km) of Cauvery water while Karnataka gets 270
billion ft (7.6 km). The actual release of water by Karnataka to Tamil Nadu is to be 192 billion ft
(5.4 km) annually. Further, Kerala will get 30 billion ft and Puducherry 7 billion ft. Tamil Nadu
appears to have been accepting the verdict while the government of Karnataka, unhappy with
the decision, filed a revision petition before the tribunal seeking a review.
26 | Page
The elevated track will be mostly along Annaisalai, which is wide enough to
have a railway line along the median. In places such as Broadway, where
there is not enough road width, it will be an underground line.
According to the DPR, corridor one will start from tollgate on tiruvotriyur
high road. It will go past the railway cross near washermanpet station as an
underground line. It will cover Broadway and high court; go past the MUC
grounds and the central station (opposite the Moore Market Complex). The
underground track will cross poonamalee high road and the cooum to enter
Annasalai near tarapore towers. The track will be elevated from the point it
enters Annasalai till where it terminates at a station before the airport
building.
The second corridor, which starts from fort station, will enter poonamallee
high road, to cover aminjikarai and Ann nagar Second Avenue. The
underground line will take a turn at tirumangalam to touch koyambedu fruit
market, CMBT and the inner ring road to terminate near the guindy suburban
railway station. Here as well as the fort station and the station opposite the
Moore market complex, will have passages to connect commuters from
suburban lines to the metro rail corridors.
Mullaperiyar Dam
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Mullaperiyar Dam
Locale
Kerala, India
Coordinates
93143N77839E9.52861N 77.14417E
1895
155 ft (47.24 m)
Length
1200 ft (365.76 m)
27 | Page
Impounds
Periyar River
Reservoir
Creates
Periyar Reservoir
Capacity
Mullaperiyar Issue
Mullaperiyar Dam is constructed over the headwaters of the Periyar River in Kerala, India. The
Periyar National Park, Thekkady is located around the Periyar reservoir formed by the
backwaters of this dam. It is operated by the Government of Tamil Nadu according to a 999-year
lease agreement made during erstwhile British colonial rule.
Contents
1Name
2History
3Disputes
o 3.1Historical background of the dispute
o 3.2Current status
4Notes
5Further reading
Name
The name is derived from a portmanteau of Mullaiyar and Periyar. As the dam is located after
the confluence of the Mullayar and Periyar Rivers, the river and hence the dam came to be called
Mullaperiyar.
History
Periyar river is a west-flowing river of Kerala State. The river flows its full course entirely
through Kerala, and derives its water almost exclusively from catchment area (Drainage basin)
inside the State. The dam stops the west flowing river to form a reservoir, which is also
exclusively located in Kerala. From the reservoir, Tamil Nadu collects water to the eastern side of
Western Ghats via a tunnel.
On 29 October 1886 a lease indenture for 999 years was made between Maharaja of Travancore
and Secretary of State for India for Periyar irrigation works. The lease indenture inter alia
granted full right, power and liberty to construct, make and carry out on the leased land and to
use exclusively when constructed, made and carried out all such irrigation works and other
works ancillary thereto to Secretary of State for India (now Tamil Nadu). By another agreement
in 1970, Tamil Nadu was also permitted to generate power.
A first dam was built by the British Corps of Royal Engineers. After the first dam was washed
away by floods, a second stonework dam was built in 1895.
28 | Page
The dam's purpose was to divert the waters of the west-flowing Periyar River eastward, taking
the water from the reservoir through a tunnel cut across the watershed and Western Ghats to the
arid rain shadow regions of Theni, Madurai District, Sivaganga District and Ramanathapuram
districts of Tamil Nadu.[4] Although Kerala claims that the agreement was forced on the then
princely State of Travancore, presently part of Kerala, the pact was revalidated in 1970 by Kerala
and Tamil Nadu. The lease provided the British the rights over "all the waters" of the
Mullaperiyar and its catchment basin, for an annual rent of Rs. 40,000.
Disputes
The government of Tamil Nadu has proposed an increase in the storage level of the dam from the
currently maintained 136 feet (41 m) to 142 feet (43 m). The Kerala government has opposed this
move, citing safety concerns for the more than hundred year old bridge and especially for the
thickly populated districts downstream. A 10-million-dollar 3D Hollywood movie inspired by
these controversies, titled Dam 999, is scheduled for release in 2011.
29 | Page
Meanwhile, the Tamil Nadu government had increased its withdrawal from the reservoir, with
additional facilities to cater to the increased demand from newly irrigated areas. One article
estimates that "the crop losses to Tamil Nadu, because of the reduction in the height of the dam,
between 1980 and 2005 is a whopping Rs. 40,000 crores. In the process the farmers of the
erstwhile rain shadow areas in Tamil Nadu who had started a thrice yearly cropping pattern had
to go back to the bi-annual cropping."
However, the Kerala Government maintains that this is not true. During the year 1979-80 the
gross area cultivated in Periyar command area was 171,307 acres (693.25 km2). After the lowering
of the level to 136 ft (41 m), the gross irrigated area increased and in 1994-95 it reached
229,718 acres (929.64 km2).
An article written in 2000 in Frontline stated: "For every argument raised by Tamil Nadu in
support of its claims, there is counter-argument in Kerala that appears equally plausible. Yet,
each time the controversy gets embroiled in extraneous issues, two things stand out: One is
Kerala's refusal to acknowledge the genuine need of the farmers in the otherwise drought-prone
regions of Tamil Nadu for the waters of the Mullaperiyar; the other is Tamil Nadu's refusal to see
that it cannot rely on or continue to expect more and more from the resources of another State to
satisfy its own requirements to the detriment of the other State. A solution perhaps lies in
acknowledging the two truths, but neither government can afford the political repercussions of
such a confession".
Current status
Tamil Nadu is the custodian of the dam and its surrounding areas. In 2006, the Supreme Court of
India has allowed for the storage level to be raised to 142 feet (43 m). However, the Kerala
Government promulgated a new "Dam Safety Act" against increasing the storage level of the
dam, which has not been objected by the Supreme Court. Tamil Nadu challenged it on various
grounds. The Supreme Court issued notice to Kerala to respond; however, did not stay the
operation of the Act even as an interim measure. The Court then advised the States to settle the
matter amicably, and adjourned hearing in order to enable them to do so. The Supreme Court of
India termed it as not unconstitutional. Meanwhile, the Supreme Court constituted a
Constitution bench to hear the case considering its wide ramifications. The case involves preconstitutional agreement between two entities which does not exist now.
Kerala's Stance: Kerala did not object giving water to Tamil Nadu. Their main cause of objection
is the dams safety as it is as old as 110 years. Increasing the level would add more pressure to be
handled by already leaking dam. No masonry dam may survive for 999 years so a new dam may
replace the existing one in near future.
Tamil Nadu's Stance: The State want that the 2006 order of Supreme court be implemented so as
to increase the water level to 142 feet (43 m).
In September 2009, the Ministry of Environment and Forests of Government of India granted
environmental clearance to Kerala for conducting survey for new dam downstream. Tamil Nadu
approached Supreme court for a stay order against the clearance; however, the plea was rejected.
Consequently, the survey was started in October, 2009. The survey team looked at three spots
and the final report is expected to be ready by March 2010 for submission to the government.
30 | Page
The arguments of Kerala and Tamil Nadu are continuing in the Constitution bench of Supreme
Court. Adv. Harish Salve appeared for Kerala and Adv. Parasaran appeared for Tamil Nadu in
Supreme Court. Kerala argued that if Mullaperiyar is an interstate river, the Supreme Court has
no jurisdiction to intervene in the issue and that it must be dealt with by an independent tribunal.
It also argued that if Mullaperiyar is an intrastate river, then the Dam Safety Authority of Kerala
is constitutional, and that the Supreme Court has no jurisdiction to intervene in a preconstitutional agreement. Thus, the water provision is now done under the 1970 review
agreement between the States. According to this agreement, only the dam area is leased to Tamil
Nadu, and water is not leased. As Kerala does not gain anything from the project inside its
territary, it is free to revisit/cancel the 1970 agreement. Kerala also argues that if the water level
is increased to 142 feets, wide forest areas that are inhabited by conserved flora and fauna will be
inundated. Moreover, as Tamil Nadu controls only the dam, Kerala has no legal restrictions for
diverting water to Idukki reservoir through another route, thereby preventing water logging
inside Mullaperiyar reservoir. When the Supreme Court sought to know whether a contract
could be unilaterally terminated, Mr. Salve said the Legislature had the competence to put an
end to the contract, which was not in Keralas interest. By legislation, a contract could be varied,
altered or annulled.
Tamil Nadu argued that the Supreme Court need to look only in to the issue of nonimplementation of Supreme Court Order to increase water level of dam by Kerala. Tamil Nadu
also asserted that Mullaperiyar is not an interstate river, and thus, there is no need for forming a
tribunal. The Tamil Nadu counsel argued that Kerala has an ulterior motive to make a new dam
and keep it under its control. Tamil Nadu fears that the water supply will be restricted if Kerala
builds a new dam and controls it.
However, political controversies arose in Tamil Nadu, as Marumalarchi Dravida Munnetra
Kazhagam (MDMK) party and BJP accused the Tamil Nadu counsel[23] is against the interests of
Tamil Nadu and demanded the state government to remove him. Vaiko, General Secretary,
MDMK, has called for a road blockade on May 28 to stop transport of foodgrains, vegetables and
milk to Kerala to protest its proposal to construct a new dam in place of the Mullaperiyar dam.
Meanwhile, Kerala proposed that a mechanism may be thought about to supply water to Tamil
Nadu similar to the one employed for its supply of drinking water to Coimbatore under the
Siruvani water supply scheme.
On 18 February 2010, the Supreme Court decided to constitute a five-member empowered
committee to study all the issues of Mullaiperiyar Dam and seek a report from it within six
months. The Bench in its draft order said Tamil Nadu and Kerala would have the option to
nominate a member each, who could be either a retired judge or a technical expert. The fivemember committee will be headed by former Chief Justice of India A. S. Anand to go into all
issues relating to the dam's safety and the storage level. However, the ruling party of Tamil
Nadu, DMK, passed a resolution that it not only oppose the apex court's decision to form the
five-member committee, but also said that the state government will not nominate any member
to it. Tamil Nadu Chief Minister M. Karunanidhi said that immediately after the Supreme Court
announced its decision to set up a committee, he had written to Congress president asking the
Centre to mediate between Kerala and Tamil Nadu on Mullaperiyar issue. However, Leader of
Opposition J. Jayalalithaa objected to the TN Government move. She said that this would give
advantage to Kerala in the issue. Meanwhile, Kerala Water Resources Minister N. K.
Premachandran told the state Assembly that the State should have the right of construction,
31 | Page
ownership, operation and maintenance of the new dam, while giving water to Tamil Nadu on the
basis of a clear cut agreement. He also informed the media that Former Supreme Court Judge Mr.
K. T. Thomas will represent Kerala on the expert panel constituted by Supreme Court. On 8
March 2010, in a fresh twist to the Mullaperiyar Dam row, Tamil Nadu told the Supreme Court
that it was not interested in adjudicating the dispute with Kerala before the special empowered
committee appointed by the apex court for settling the inter-State issue. However, Supreme
Court refused to accept Tamil Nadu's request to scrap the decision to form the empowered
committee. SC also criticized the Union Government on its reluctance in funding the empowered
committee.
Notes
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
bursting or breaking of the 110 years old, 175ft high, 5704ft long lime and
brick dam in question, kerala, being a land-locked state, appears to be over
cautious. The state being land hungry and environmental imbalance
snowballing into imbalance in and destabilization of irrigation and, in turn,
agrarian economy also cannot be ruled out. Kerala appears to be more
concerned about the consequences inland than about the Mullaiperiyar dam
as such.
TamilNadu went to the Supreme Court and succeeded in convincing
the court to pass an order, in February 2006,in its favour to increase the height
of the reservoir level of the dam to142ft from the present 136ft. kerala
countered it by moving swiftly to the extent of holding a special two-day
assembly session in march to discuss the issue and unanimously passed a
legislation, kerala irrigation and water conservation ( Amendment) act, 2006
in order to steal away the basis of the Supreme Court order. The amended act
has empowered the kerala dam safety authority to fix maximum reservoir
level for scheduled dams and to instruct custodians of the dam accordingly.
In this case, mullaiperiyar is a scheduled dam and custodian is the Tamilnadu
state government. When the kerala government approached the court for
revision of its order, the Supreme Court rejected it and has advised talks
between the two governments. Talks that have been on for last few months
appear not to have yielded desired results and it is only a matter of time for
the Tamilnadu state government to approach the court to enforce the verdict.
The kerala government is coming up with the issue of safety of the 110year-old dam and the consequent issues that are expected to affect more the
35 lakh people living in downstream in the districts of idukki, kottayam,
erunakulam, pathananmathitta and alappuzha. Tamilnadu, on the other
hand, is raising the issues of irrigation and drinking water in the rain shadow
districts of theni, dindigul, madurai virudhunagar, sivaganga and
ramanathapuram which would otherwise have no access to any water
facilities.
Tamilnadu claimed to have lost 45000 crores in the last 25 years because
more than 8000 hectares of land went dry way of reduction in the original
reservoir level of 152ft.
As the kerala government said that the dam is so weak that it cannot
withstand storage level of more than 136ft, an expert committee was formed
33 | Page
to study the technical feasibility and ways to strengthen the ailing dam. After
some modification, renovation and repair works were carried out; the expert
committee inspected the dam and has certified that the dam can withstand a
reservoir level of 142ft initially. But the kerala government is not ready to buy
the argument and insists that the reservoir level should not be increased at
any cost.
The center of earth science studies in kerala says that the dam cannot
withstand an earthquake of the magnitude of 6 or more on the Richter scale if
the epicenter is near the dam. The institute also assessed that tremor of such a
magnitude is not too far as the region has been experiencing several tremors
on lesser degrees for quite sometime now, i.e., in the last two decades. The
chances of occurrence of such tremors are also high due to the presence of
lineaments and fault zones in the region.
The mullaiperiyar controversy has opened up newer issues for
discussion. Strangely, the dam is located in the lands of kerala while the
maintenance of dam and the operation of sluice gate are undertaken by the
government. The land was taken on lease by Tamilnadu for 999 years in 1886
through an agreement between the then maharaja of state of travancore and
the madras presidency. The project was conceived in 1895. Again, a new
agreement was signed around 1970 when the old one was about to expire.
The lease amount was increased from Rs.5/toRs.3per acre and the tamilnadu
government was allowed to produce electricity at a price. The whole problem
started only in 1979 when the region faced mild tremors. Now, there are also
debates on annexing dam areas bordering the state to tamilnadu. The state
reorganization commission had also suggested including devikulam and
peermedu areas (dam areas) in the state. Tamilnadu is concerned because the
new amended law empowers kerala dam safety authority even to
decommission dams, if found unsafe. Such an eventuality will affected more
than 80000 acres of land that is under irrigation and will be a body below to
the state of tamilnadu.
It has also opened debates on water policies of both governments,
diverting west-flowing rivers (from kerala to Arabian Sea) towards east
(tamilnadu) so as to avoid wastage of water of water, the rational of allowing
privatization and commercialization of water in this water starved era,
policies that makes people to pay for every drop of water they use while
encouraging multinationals to go scot-free in exploiting all our water
34 | Page
Weak condition of the dam posed a threat to the lives and property in three
districts of kerala.
Mr.Buthisigamani said water from the periyar dam (with a capacity of 15.565
tmc at 152ft) would flow into the idukki dam (with a capacity of 72 tmc)
through mountainous regions and would not pose any threat to lives. Unlike
kerala, which was rich in water resources and draining 2000 tmc ftof
rainwater into the sea, Tamilnadu was dependent on the neighbouring states
for water.
The team is leaving here for New Delhi on January 22.
Mulaiperiyar Dam issue
In India, sharing of river waters between the riparian states has always been a
ticklish issue. We have seen many disputes in respect of rivers like sutlej,
narmada, godavari, Krishna, cauvery, parambikkulam & sholayar. All these
rivers are interstate rivers flowing through more than one state and naturally
each state tries its best to secure a larger share of that invaluable resource,
water.
But the dispute between tamilnadu and kerala over mullaiperiyar dam,
which hit the headlines,when the roads connecting both the state were
blockaded recently by slogan shouting agitators from tamilnadu, belonging to
the ruling party, DMK, is of a different nature. With vaiko of MDMK on a
padayatra from madurai to gudalur, calling for raising the water level in the
dam. With PMKs Dr.Ramdas and Dks Veeramani too launching similar
dharnas and with the AIADMks Dr. Jayalithaa too launching her own tirade,
emotions ran high and naturally Dr. kalaignar, though always very
diplomatic in his dealings with the neighbouring state, could not but join the
fray.
In the midst of the emotional outbursts of the leaders and their parties trying
to extract the maximum possible political mileage for themselves, the core
issues got clouded. Let us examine the issues involved and try to find out
what exacrly is the problem in mullaiperiyar.
The river periyar is not an inter-state river. This west-flowing river originates
in kerala and flows throughout in that state before winding its way into the
37 | Page
coastal plain and branching off thereafter, only to meander into the
backwaters near kochi and then to merge into the Arabian sea.
About 120 years ago, the British who ruled in the madras presidency enters
into an agreement with the maharajah of travancore, to permit them to
construct a dam across the Periyar River in that state and then to divert the
water impounded to the east, to irrigation the parched dry lands of the then
madurai& ramnad districts. There was also a sociological aspect. In the
absences of any scope for any productive economic activity, large section of
the people (mainly kallars) there, tended to take to the path of crime and
violence. The British had even declared them a criminal tribe at that time.
They had chosen to follow a carrot and stick policy and thought that once the
periyar water was made available, the ruthless criminal will turn into a
hardworking and honest farmer, earning by the sweat of his brow. The
agreement was signed for a period of 999 years! (The usual long term
agreements we have heard of run for 99 years). The quantity of water to be
transferred to the East, across the Western Ghats, was not specified. The role
of the legendary Bhageeratha who changed the course of Ganga and brought
it into his country was played here by Col Pennyquick, the then British Chief
Engineer who completed the Dam in the year 1895.
The rubble-lime-surkhi dam has done an excellent job, impounding large
quantities of water, year after year and helping to convert 2 lakhs of acres of
waste lands into fertile farmland. Agricultural prosperity induced the people
to reform themselves and become law-abiding citizens.(After all, they have
something to lose now).
Though the original design life of such a dam would be about 50 years, the
excellent quality of construction enabled it to exist without any problem for a
much longer period. However, in the 1970's complaints started coming in and
1979 turned out to be a problem year. Extraordinarily large quantities of
water began seeping through the Dam creating apprehensions in Kerala.
They started expressing grave doubts about the strength and stability of the
dam. After all, it was an 85 year old structure, built with no cement or steel
and using only rubble, lime and surkhi and it was being subjected to heavy
stresses and strains. There were genuine fears that due to the tremendous
pressure exerted by the large quantity and height of the water it impounded,
some weak spots in the Dam structure might even give way, leading to a
great catastrophe. The thickly populated Periyar valley was at grave risk, it
38 | Page
was stated. Soon politicians in both the States entered the scene. Emotions
ran high. The Government of India & the Central Water and Power
Commission (CW&PC) intervened. After lengthy parleys, Tamilnadu agreed
to strengthen the Dam as required by the Central experts. It was decided that
maximum water level in the Dam would be maintained at 136 ft. until the
strengthening jobs were completed satisfactorily (the full reservoir level was
152 ft.), in order to reduce the strain on the old structure and keep it within
safe limits.
After, the strengthening works were carried out, Government of Tamil Nadu
called for raising the water level in the Mullaperiyar reservoir to 152 feet.
Kerala objected, pointing to the continuing seepage of water. Tamil Nadu
argued that the seepage was within normal limits and did not cause any
concern. Discussions failed and Tamilnadu went to the Supreme Court and
secured favourable orders from the highest Court for stepping up the storage
level. Kerala retaliated with a new legislation forming a Dam Safety
Authority which would examine the safety aspects of all the dams in the state
(including the Mullaperiyar Dam) and determine the maximum permissible
storage levels for each of them. Tamil Nadu approached the Supreme Court
again, challenging the validity of this enactment. The Supreme Court
suggested settling the issue by talks between the Chief Ministers under the
good offices of the Prime Minister. The two Chief Ministers promptly met in
the presence of the Union Irrigation Minister, explained their respective
positions and instructed their own Irrigation Ministers to continue the next
round. They met once and yet there was no progress. Meanwhile, there was a
spate of intemperate statements and rejoinders from both the sides. The rest is
very recent history.
What Tamilnadu wants is water from Periyar. And even today, nobody in
Kerala objects to the releasing of Periyar waters to Tamilnadu. Nobody in
Kerala has so far called for even restricting the quantity of water released.
Nobody there objects to Tamil Nadu drawing away the entire water from the
reservoir as and when they like, in quantities convenient to them, so long as
the level is not more than 136 ft. And Tamil Nadu has very successfully
managed this operation during the last 27 years, ensuring that the level in the
reservoir is never more than 136 ft. But when the chain of reservoirs and
irrigation tanks in Tamil Nadu, from Suriliyar near Cumbum down to
Rameswaram at the fag end ,are full, with heavy rains on the eastern side of
39 | Page
the hills too, Tamil Nadu cannot naturally receive more water(lest the level
should cross 136 ft) and then if more freshes arrive, some water will have to
be released down the Dam's spillway. This will flow into the downstream
course of Periyar, reaching the Idukki reservoir about 75 kms away. Tamil
Nadu has done this operation so efficiently that only on a very few days has
water overflowed down the Mullaiperiyar Dam's spillway all these years. If
storage facilities in Tamil Nadu can be augmented, even this can be avoided.
In short, what Tamil Nadu wants is water and Kerala does not refuse it. Tamil
Nadu has demonstrated it ability to take all the water keeping the level
within 136 ft.. What additional advantage does it get by increasing the storage
level? Only some operational* flexibility. So is the raising of the Periyar
reservoir level beyond 136 ft, a big life and death issue as far as Tamil Nadu is
concerned?
Let us pause for a moment and think of what is happening in the Cauvery
basin. Annai Cauvery, as the Tamils emotionally refer to the River Goddess,
has been Tamil Nadu's lifeline; it's most important river. From time
immemorial, Cauvery waters irrigated 12 lakh acres of paddy in Tamilnadu's
granary of Thanjavur alone. And lots of paddy, sugarcane, banana, betelvine
and a host of other crops flourished along the river's course in the other
districts as well. But now -there is problem there, every year. Karnataka has
constructed dams across Cauvery upstream and only the water which
overflows reaches the Tamilnadu border. And every year it is a struggle to
get some Cauvery water released even to save the standing crops. The
successive Chief Ministers of Tamilnadu have been forced to go up to the
Prime minister to get their rightful share of Cauvery waters, year after year!
While Karnataka refuses to give Tamilnadu its legitimate share of water from
Cauvery, Kerala readily agrees to release the entire water impounded in
Mullaiperiyar, which is not even an interstate river! An unequal; 999 year
agreement signed during the colonial times has been honoured even after
Independence. And water delivered without protest-not for irrigation alone;
for power generation as well. They are only worried about the safety of the
Dam and the lives of 30 lakhs of people. Perhaps their fears are unfounded.
But they don't believe so. Will it not be in the interest of Tamilnadu to do
whatever is required to allow these people to sleep without fearing for their
lives? But repairs have already been carried out, and to the satisfaction of
CW&PC experts. Why they are shouting even now? They say that the dam,
40 | Page
built with rubble in lime, is 115 years old already. Will patchworks help?
Everywhere such old structures have been decommissioned long ago...So the
debate goes on.
Will our politicians transform themselves into statesmen and solve this
problem
41 | Page
TAMILNADU
1. During whose chiefministership TAMIL was proclaimed as the governing language
K. Kamaraj (December 1956)
2. When was first women police introduced in Tamilnadu 1973
3. The length of the marina beach 13 km (Worlds Second Largest)
4. Mini Japan of Tamilnadu Sivakasi
5. Anti Dowry Act 1961 (Dowry is punishable offence)
6. Nobel Prize Winner of Tamilnadu (Tamilans)
-
7. The Chief Minister who dissolved the Legislative Council M.G. Ramachandran
8. Service Commission (Before Madras Public Service Commission 1957)
(Now Tamilnadu Public Service Commission 1970)
9. The first Chief Minister with film industry backgroung Aringar Annadurai)
10. The I.P.S. officer who won Sahitya Academy Award (Thilagavathy I.P.S. 2005)
11. First University of Tamilnadu before Independence (Chennai University (1857) by
Lord Gamming Governor General)
12. First Tamil University Thanjavur (1981)
INDIA
13. What is KITCHEN CABINET?
It is the Inner Cabinet. Two or four influential member known by Prime Minister to
discuss the issue of very important political and public problem. It is discussed
secretly.
14. First Chief Election Commissioner of India (Sukumar Sen)
15. The second highly spoken language (Bengali) 1st Hindi, 5th Tamil
42 | Page
16. First Individual Gold Medal in Olympics (Abinav Bindra (2008) 10 m AIR riffle
17. How many times India have won Gold Medal in Hockey 8 times
18. How many times India have entered the Finals in world cup cricket 3 times (Won
Twice 1983, 2011)
19. Indian Currency is also called as (Fiat Moneyor Legal Tendar Money)
20. Worlds Smallest Country (Vatican City (Europe) Pope Lives there.
43 | Page
: Mr. Murugakumar. P
1.
2.
3.
4.
Order of preference
Functions of DC, DSP & DR
Highest law officer of the state & India
Per capita income GDP growth rate
Who officially declare growth rate?
5. How to compare and countries
6. What is PCR Act ,ijtpl fLikahd xU rl;lk; for SC
7. List out fundamental rights
8. Dams in CBE Dist?
9. Purpose of Siruvani Dam? My Native district
10. Why growth rate slow down
11. My degree Commerce
12. What is Asset, Liability
Net loss Balance sheet vq;Nfappear MFk;
13. What are items comes under IPR (Intellectual property rights)
World orgn for IPR
14. Difference between Judicial & Exe magistrate
15. What is part III of the constitution
16. Difference between Dams & Reservoir
17. What is standby Reservoir
3. Name
1.
2.
3.
4.
44 | Page
: Miss. Mallika. K
: Mr. Senniappan. N
1. Ch;
2. NfhypTl;> ghypTl;> `hypTl; vd;why; vd;d?
3. thl;lh;Y} Nghh;
4. neg;Nghypad; nrhd;d thrfk;
5. gpnuQ;R Gul;rp ele;j Mz;L 1789
6. [hypad; thyhghf; gLnfhiy
7. 1909 kpz;Nlh khh;yp rPh;j;jpUj;jk;
8. 1919 khz;NlF nrk;]; Nghh;L rPh;j;jpUj;jk;
9. ePyfz;l rh];jphp ahh;??
10. itf;fk; tPuh; ahh;?
11. ghujpjhrdpd; ,aw;ngah;?
12. n[afhe;jdpd; ez;gh; jpuhtpl murpaypy; Kf;fpakhdth; ahh;?
13. Order of preference
14. Supreme Commander of armed forces
15. Kg;gilfspd; jsgjpfs; ahh;?
16. xU tof;if vjd; mbg;gilapy; (b.v];.gp Mf ,Uf;Fk; nghOJ) gjpT nra;tPh;fs;?
17. Vd; nlg;b fnyf;lUf;F Kd;Dhpik nfhLj;jPhf
; s;
45 | Page
18. xU jha; jd; kfs; (taJ 18) cld; fhty; epiyak; te;J ghypay; td;Kiwf;F
Ml;gl;ljhf Gfhh; nfhLf;fpwhh;. ahUf;Fk; ntspapy; njhpahky; vg;gb tprhuiz
Nkw;nfhs;tPh;fs;?
19. ,yq;ifg; gpur;rid RUf;fkhf $wTk;
20. ,uapy;Nt mikr;rh;fs; ngah;> nghJ Nkyhsh; ngah;? btprd;fs; ngah;?
21. ,uapy;Nt gl;n[l; gw;wp $Wf
22. Plan expenditure and Non plan expenditure
6. Name
: Jeyalakshmi. A
Qualification
: B.E ECE
District
Graduate
Rev. Dept
LOk Sabha and Rajya sabha
Pakistan
Mumbai terror attack
Police, Crime
9. Name
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
: Mr. Kalidass
46 | Page
6.
7.
8.
9.
10. Name
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
: M. Kannan
11. Name
: Miss. Kavitha. G
: Mr. Periasamy. P
47 | Page
Qualification
: M.Sc Agriculture
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
What is mean by Sales tax, Income tax, Customs duty, excise duty
This of the above tax imposed by central government
What is difference between CT Scan & PET Scan
Tell me about ELISA and Western blot technic
What is mean by crmy layer, & the upper limit
Contribution of Haryana in nation
What is mean by bioremediation
What is the progress of agriculture after independence, tell me recent position, How to
improve based on your opinion
9. Tell me about female infanticide, if you are a RDO, how to react you noticed female
infanticide in your area
10. What is mean by recom post, how you can produce from city waste and where what are
all the measures taken by government.
11. What is the test practically used for identification of children before birth, tell me about
the act passed recently by government.
12. What is mean by gender imbalance
13. What name called for trans gender
14. tho;f;ifapy; cdf;F kjpg;G NtZkh my;yJ Gfo; NtZkh?
14. Name
: Mrs. Kavitha. P
16. Name
1.
2.
3.
4.
: Mrs. Mariammal
: Miss. Rajeswari. V
48 | Page
Board : Chairman
5. Black money
6. Binami
7. Planning organising controlling co-ordination
8. Shivaji (history person)
9. Inflation control measures
10. Standard deviation
11. Sub prime mortage
12. participatory note
13. Tsunami
17. Name
: Mr. Nivas. J
Qualification
1. Is there injustice being done for OBC students while following reservation procedure in
UPSC
2. Reverse Osmosis can it be used in effluent treatment plants
3. About home district Kanchipuram
4. Which science do you rate the most, Maths, physics, chemistry, biology
5. Relation between Maths & Mechanical Engineering
6. Water harvesting pros & cons
7. How do you apply Engineering in Civil Service
18. Name
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
19. Name
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
: Mr. Poongundranar
UPSC
Olympic
Agri 2 questions
Cricket
GwehD}W
ahJk; CNu
etfpufk;
CTBT
xU jpUf;Fws; nrhy;yTk; - eph;thfk; rhh;e;J
20. Name
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
: Mr. Pazhanisamy
District profile
North East state names & High court
Post preference
Nano
Degree subject
49 | Page
Board : Thilagavathy
6. Police department
7. Computerised latest departments
21. Name
: Miss. Ramyadevi. R
Board: Thilagavathy
: Mr. Ramamurthy. M
Board : Chairman
: Mr. Sadeesh. R
Board : Neelambigai
50 | Page
Qualification
: M.Sc Agriculture
1. Native district
2. What are the articles related to SPSC (TNPSC)
3. Why need the 2nd Green revolution
4. Why prefer the DC than DSP
5. What are the functions of DC as per Civil Service-code
6. How to improve the soil health
7. Qualities of DC
8. What are familier NGOs in TN
9. How to reacting the NGO
10. Impact of NGO in society
11. Agriculture area in TN & India
12. Hybrids importance & Terminator seeds.
13. Why attack India
25. Name
: Miss. Sangamithirai.
Qualification
51 | Page
: M.A. History
: Mrs. Bharathi. C
1. ghujpahh;
2. mWgil tPLfs;
3. gQ;rg+j Nfhtpy;fs;
4. jpUr;nre;J}hpd; rpwg;G
5. fpuhkrig
6. fpuhkrig $Lk; ehl;fs;
7. ,we;j tpyq;Ffspy; ,Ue;J taij fz;Lgpbf;Fk; Kiw
8. etk;gh; 26> brk;gh; 26> nrg;lk;gh; 26
9. Hobbies related questions
10. kjE}y;fs; Hindus
Muslim
Christians
11. Post preference related question
29. Name
: Jayapriya. G
Settlement Dead
52 | Page
: Mr. Rajamanikkam. P
1. TASMAC Expansion
2. TNSWAN Expansion
3. File tracking system vd;why; vd;d?
4. Mangrove Forest vd;why; vd;d> ,lq;fs;
5. uhkhazj;jpy; gpbj;j ghj;jpuk; ahh;? Vd;?
6. fk;guhkhazj;jpy; gpbj;j ghj;jpuk; ahh;? Vd;?
7. kJiu rpwg;G vd;d?
8. VAT mky;gLj;jpa Njjp?VAT Achievement vd;d?
9. Commercial Taxes, Revenue njhlh;G vd;d?
10. Commercial Taxes, Police njhlh;G vd;d?
11. TN current Issues
12. Kjd; Kjypy; thpia mwpKfg;gLj;jpath; ahh;? vd;d rjtpfpjk;?
13. atdh;fs; vd;why; ahh;? mth;fspd; jw;Nghija ehL vJ?
14. ,jpfhrq;fs;> ,yf;fpaq;fs; vd;why; vd;d?
15. TN power crisis
16. TN stand on LTTE
17. Satyam computer problem?
32. Name
: Baby. R
53 | Page
: Mr. Balaji
34. Name
: Mrs. Valarmathi. J
1. Expansion of Name?
2. ehl;bd; nghUshjhuj;ij epyTld; xg;gPL?
3. epyT KOkjpahf vt;tsT ehs;?
4. ehL Kd;Ndw vd;d nra;a Ntz;Lk;?
5. ,e;jpahtpy; cs;s ngz; Kjy;fs; vj;jid? ahh;?
6. jkpo;ehl;bd; nrhy; vj;jid tifg;gLk;?
7. ngah;nrhy; vj;jid tifg;gLk;?
8. jhpR epy Nkk;ghL vd;why; vd;d?
9. khtl;l fnyf;lh; ahh;? v];.gp ahh;? fkp~;dh; ahh;? DIG ahhh;?
10. gthdp rq;fNk];tuUf;F Vd; mg;ngah; te;jJ?
11. ngUe;Jiw rpg;fhl;by; cs;s njhopw;rhiyfs; vd;d?
12. Perundurai Tashildar ahh;?
13. PTO (Power take off) vd;why; vd;d?
14. DPO administration I ey;ygbahf elj;j vd;d eltbf;iffs; vLf;fyhk;?
15. Mfha jhkiuapd; kUj;Jt ngah; vd;d?
16. DPO Administration I ey;ytbahf elj;j vd;d etbf;iffs;
17. Agriculture y; Vw;gl;Ls;s etPd khw;wq;fs; vd;d?
35. Name
: Yogamani. T
54 | Page
: Mr. Rajasekar. N
55 | Page
: Mr. Thangiah
1. Functions of DC
2. Cr.Pc How DC will implement it?
Cr Pc 144
56 | Page
1. Global warming
2. Terrorist attack Mumbai (ATS chief)
3. Nano car (details)
57 | Page
WB-CM, Gujarat CM
4. Chess Anand
5. PIL
6. PET, MRI Scamel
7. NHRC, SMRC
8. CD, DVD define memory capacity
9. My country, My life book details
10. DC (G-I) tell me what is the reason to enter into G-I services
11. IT Technological field
12. Political parties
13. Madras University, Periyar university
14. Define your name
40. Name
: Miss. Sughashin. R
1. What would be your priorities if you were the prime Minister of India reason out
2. Why did you choose DC post?
3. 3) What is Repo rate?
4. 4) What is bank rate? Difference between the two
5. 5) SWOT analysis? Why is it done?
6. Diff between Competition and
7. SEBI and its function
8. Order of procedure after PM
9. If Lok sabha mouse an urgent bill to Rajya sabha and if RS does not accept what is
the next process.
10.
Blue ocean policy
11.
Todays RBI norms(paper news)
12.
Inflation causes and why
13.
Has inflation decrease now and how?
14.
As an administrator would you be rigid or flexible. If so why and how?
15.
What are the essential qualities you think you posses a leader should have and
what do you posses.
16.
Hobby and why and what you learnt?
17.
Why leaders like Gandhi? Buddha lead a poverty life and we go in for
earnings?
18.
Purchasing power parity?
19.
How do you fix a price for a product?
20.
VAT and CENUAT difference
21.
How much does leather industry contribute to our GCT
22.
How can programmers and policies laid and how can they be maintained
23.
If gain DSP what would be your answer why
24.
How do you dui toil terrorism
25.
Give some examples of the structure of how a grass root policy to be
implemented
26.
How bank rates change during inflation?
27.
What should be done to eradicate poverty in society?
28.
Application of your management studies in work?
29.
Difference between public administration and Business administration?
58 | Page
41. Name
: Mr. Senthil. R
1. LTTE
2. Let Head Head Quarters
3. Saniya Mirsa Ranking
4. Who Is Saina Neiwal
5. Whether Ind Can Destroy The Terrorist Camps In Pan
6. Why India In Un Permanent Council
7. Politics In Colleges
8. Types Of Inflations
9. Diff Between Private Sector And Govt Sector
10. Problem Between Isral And Palastinam
59 | Page
INTERVIEW QUESTIONS
P. MALLIKA
,l
xJf;fL
P
ghuhSkd;wj;jpy;
vd;w
gpujkh;
fhyj;jpy;
jhf;fy;
60 | Page
61 | Page
Vd;
62 | Page
63 | Page
ePh;
ghrdj;jpw;Fk;
jkpo;ehl;by;
64 | Page
log10
10
65 | Page
d; kjpg;G vd;d?
2. e5 d; kjpg;G vd;d?
3. ex d; kjpg;G vd;d?
4. Integral of Cosx
5. Integral of Sinx
6. ];Bgd; `f;fpd;]; vd;gth; ahh;?
7. 100 khzth;fspy; 1/10 Mz;fs; kw;Wk; 1/4 ngz;fs; vdpy; tpfpjk; vd;d?
8. mry; &.100 jdptl;b kw;Wk; $l;Ltl;b rjtPjk;
mitfSf;F ,ilNa cs;s NtWghL ahJ?
4%
vdpy;
,uz;L
66 | Page
Mz;LfSf;f
fhuzk; vd;d?
Syed Rabiyammal
1. jpz;Lf;fy; khtl;lk; vg;NghJ> vjpypUe;J gphpe;jJ?
2. kJiuapypUe;J gphpe;j NtW khtl;lk;?
3. Ky;iy nghpahW gpur;rid> jw;Nghija epiy
4. ghj;jpkh gPtp gw;wp kw;Wk; ,uhzp kq;fk;khs; gw;wp
5. mf;gh; Njhw;Wtpj;j kjk;
6. nrd;id tpkhd epiyaj;jpd; ngah;fs;
7. jpUf;Fws;
RNu~;Fkhh;
1. 2010 rhfpj;a mfhlkp ghpR ngw;wth; ahh;?
2. n[afhe;jd; vOjpa E}y;fs; ahit?
3. Kjy; jpUf;Fws;> filrp jpUf;Fws; vd;d?
4. ehl;Lg;gz; vOjpath; ahh;?
5. jkpo;j;jha; tho;j;J ghbath; ahh;? filrp 2 thpfs; $Wf
6. GJf;ftpij vd;why; vd;d?
7. GJf;ftpij vd;W $Wf
8. mg;Jy; uFkhdpd; GJf;ftpij gw;wpf;$Wf
9. jkpo; ghlE}y; nra;As; thpir Kiw ahJ?
10. mfg;ghly; E}y; 2 $Wf
11. Gwg;ghly; E}y; 2 $Wf
12. jkpo;ehl;bd; kyh; vJ?
13. mfk; Gwk; E}y; vJ?
14. ePq;fs; Fwpg;gpl;l gjtp thpir vd;d?
15. rg; hp[p];lh; gjtpapd; gzpfs; ahit?
16. tpy;yq;f rhd;wpjo; gw;wpf;$Wf
17. vj;jid rq;fq;fs; ,Ue;jd? mit ahit?
18. fhfpjg; g+ E}iy vOjpath; ahh;?
19. fy;tpj;Jiw mikr;rh; ahh;?
20. fy;tpj;Jiw nrayh; ahh;?
jz;lghzp
67 | Page
68 | Page
69 | Page
9. What is the different between closing stock value and market value?
10. Savings bank account system ve;j tUlk; Jtq;fg;gl;lJ?
11. ,e;jpah;fshy; Jtq;fg;gl;l Kjy; tq;fp?
12. i`juhghj;jpy; jpthyhd IT fk;ngdp vJ? mjd; jiyth;?
13. jw;NghJ me;j epWtdj;jpd; ngah;? jw;Nghija jiyth; ahh;?
14. Karvy d; jiyikaplk; vJ?
15. Debenture f;Fk; Divident f;F cs;s tpj;jpahrk;
16. Debenture-f;Fk; Share f;Fk; cs;s tpj;jpahrk;
17. HAL d; jiyikaplk;
18. RBI-d; gzpfs;? Jtq;fg;gl;l ,lk;? Mz;L? FL
19. tptrhaj;jpw;fhfj; Jtq;fg;gl;l tq;fpapd; ngah; vd;d?
20. mjd; gzpfs;> ve;j tUlk; Jtq;fg;gl;lJ? FO
21. jQ;rht+hpd; rpwg;Gfs;?
C. Jayachitra B.A
1. Tell your Post preference
2. Tell about the function of registrar office
3. What is endorsement certificate
4. Marriage acts
5. ,Ug;gplr; rhd;wpjo; ahhplk; thq;f Ntz;Lk;
6. Functions of CAG
7. Functions of Public Accounts Committee
8. Which is Pink city, seven sisters, twin city?
9. How many high courts are there in North Eastern states
10. Tell about Shakespeare
11. Shakespears plays tragedies of comedies
70 | Page
71 | Page
72 | Page
Tamil
1. Gf;fh; ghpR gw;wp $W? ,q;fpyhe;J - ,yf;fpa tpUJ
2. rhfpj;jpa mfhnlkp rkPgj;jpy; ahUf;F> E}ypd; ngah; ahJ?ehQ;rpy; ehld;
3. jkpo; gy;fiyf;fofk; vq;Fs;sJ? jQ;ir
4. kzpNkfiy E}yhrphpah; ahh;? rPj;jiyr;rhj;jdhh;
5. ghujpapd; ghly; ehd;F $W?
6. jw;fhyf;f ftpQh; ehy;tiuf; $W?
Senthiraj
1. What role placement agencies play in overseas job marketing?
2. What is underemployment?
3. Are you a government employee? When you got into government service? Why trying
again?
4. Vw;fdNt xU ehl;by; rebellion ele;J KbQ;rhr;R. ,g;g ,d;ndhU ehl;by; Nghuhl;lk;
Muk;gkhapLr;R. vq;F vd;W njhpAkh?
5. gpur;ridf;Fhpa egh; ahh;?
6. Which means technology domain used to spread sub rebellions?
7. Which is the highest civilian award in the country?
8. Martyrs Day?
9. Who is Omar Abdulla? Who is his father? What is he?
10. jkpof murpd; eyj;jpl;lq;fs;?
11. What are the power of President?
12. Who is the chairman of Rajya Sabha?
13. ehd;F M];fh; mthh;L thq;fpa glk; vJ?
14. gpujkh; kd;Nkhfd; rpq; murpaYf;F tUtjw;F Kd;dhy; tfpj;j ,U Kf;fpa gjtpfs;
vd;d?
15. ,UKiw jw;fhypf gpujkuhf ,Ue;jth; ahh;?
16. What is the present salary of MPs?
73 | Page
njhpahj
ngz;
,kakiy
kiyapd;
vtnu];l;
74 | Page
rpfuj;ij
75 | Page
76 | Page
77 | Page
20. cyff;Nfhg;ig
$wpaJ vd;d?
fhy;ge;J
Nghl;bapy;
Nghl;bapy;
ntw;wp
ngWk;
mzpia
Kd;$l;bNa
78 | Page
Subject
1. Electronics and communication degree-y; last semester subjects?
2. Tee the block diagram for T.V. receiver?
3. What is modulation?
4. What type of modulation used in TV and radio?
5. Which book you followed for T.V. Antennae subject?
6. What are the recent communication techniques?
7. What do you mean by fibre optic communicated? How it works?
79 | Page
8. What is CED?
9. Significance of LED?
10. What is Luner diode?
11. Difference between electrical and electronics.
General
1. When is Patriotic day celebrated?
2. First C.M. of T.M. after independence?
3. First P.M. of India after independence?
4. First women P.M. in World?
5. rpyg;gjpfhuj;jpd; ehafp ahh;?
6. First president of India after Independence?
80 | Page