Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
ORIGINAL REPORT
Methods
Introduction
Spinal cord injury (SCI) was one of the most severe injuries that
occurred in the 2008 Sichuan earthquake in the Peoples Republic
J Rehabil Med 44
of China. SCI poses significant challenges for long-term rehabilitation. With recent developments in rehabilitation medicine and
the adoption of a bio-psycho-social model for measuring health
and disability, focus has shifted from improving physical function
to enhancing quality of life (QoL) and community integration as
the primary goals of SCI rehabilitation (1, 2).
The experience of the 2005 Kashmir earthquake in Pakistan
regarding SCI patients showed the benefit of institutional rehabilitation during the emergency phase of disaster response (3).
A summary of the rehabilitation rescue efforts in the Sichuan
earthquake concluded that comprehensive rehabilitation measures including therapeutic interventions, training and education,
and social and vocational rehabilitation should be performed
immediately and concurrently with clinical treatment (4, 5). A
series of studies of patients with SCI has indicated that physical rehabilitation has a significant positive effect on activities
of daily living (ADL) and correlates with functional health (6,
7). Furthermore, patients who received rehabilitation training
show improved social integration (8). However, the increase in
QoL and participation in the community is a long-term process
that requires persistence and constant adaptation, especially in
the community setting (9, 10). Prospective follow-up studies of
QoL and community integration of earthquake survivors with
SCI after returning to their reconstructed community have not
been conducted previously.
This study aims to compare the functional status, QoL and community integration of earthquake survivors with SCI at the time
of discharge from primary, institution-based rehabilitation with
that at one year after returning to the community. It also seeks to
identify domains of QoL and areas of community integration (i.e.
social participation) upon which rehabilitation should particularly
focus in order to improve QoL and community integration.
Design
This is a prospective cohort study measuring variables of interest in
changes of functional status, QoL and community integration after re-
201
Results
The subjects had a mean age of 52.6 years (SD 15.8); range
2079. The male:female ratio was approximately 0.7:1 (n=11
and 15, respectively). Sixty-nine percent (n=18) were married
and 30.8% (n=8) were single (1 spouse died from the earthquake, 3 spouses died due to other reasons). Fifty-three percent
(n=14) had received formal education (3 beyond senior high
school, 11 below senior high school) and 46.2% (n=12) were
illiterate. Fifteen percent (n=4) were in paid employment by
March 2011. The mean value of annual family income for all
survivors was $849 (SD 503) (Table I).
52.6 (15.8)
42.3
57.7
69.2
30.8
53.8
46.2
15.4
849 (503)
J Rehabil Med 44
202
X. Hu et al.
AIS
C7
C8T6 T7L2
L3S2
S2
n (%)
A
B
C
D
Total
3
3
1
1
2
2
6 (23.1)
2 (7.60)
7 (26.9)
11 (42.3)
26 (100)
5
2
7
5
19
Pain
Pressure sore
Neurogenic bladder
UTI
Bladder stone
HO
1
1
1
1
19
10
12
12
2
1
2
1
1
2
26 (100)
12 (46.2)
14 (53.8)
15 (57.7)
2 (7.69)
1 (3.85)
MBIa
WISCI IIb
VASa
PHQ-9a
At discharge
Mean (SD)
In community
Mean (SD)
71.2 (25.8)
5.81 (7.00)
5.38 (1.38)
10.5 (5.38)
81.9 (18.7)
9.65 (8.15)
5.04 (1.46)
9.62 (5.16)
0.002
0.000
0.836
0.391
a
The variables were normally distributed and differences between baseline
and follow-up were tested by paired t-tests.
b
The variables were not normally distributed and differences between
baseline and follow-up were tested by Wilcoxon test.
MBI: Modified Barthel Index; WISCI II: Walking Index for Spinal Cord
Injury II; VAS: visual analogue scale; PHQ-9: Patient Health Questionnaire
Depression Module.
Total scorea
QoL (self-rated)a
Health (self- rated)a
Physical healtha
Psychological health
Satisfaction with social
relationshipsa
Environmenta
At discharge
Mean (SD)
In community
Mean (SD)
68.3 (12.6)
2.65 (1.09)
2.65 (1.23)
19.0 (4.98)
17.0 (3.89)
8.27 (2.31)
71.4 (10.2)
3.84 (0.731)
3.81 (0.749)
20.6 (2.58)
17.8 (3.38)
9.42 (1.92)
0.011
0.000
0.000
0.117
0.202
0.017
24.1 (5.65)
23.6 (6.14)
0.657
Total score
Physical independencea
Cognitive independenceb
Mobilitya
Occupationa
Social integrationa
a
At discharge
Mean (SD)
In community
Mean (SD)
322 (87.0)
89.4 (11.2)
75.5 (23.4)
51.2 (20.5)
39.5 (32.0)
63.0 (25.5)
344 (80.8)
96.4 (4.70)
61.9 (17.4)
67.4 (28.0)
42.2 (35.4)
66.6 (27.7)
0.127
0.001
0.002
0.009
0.108
0.315
a
The variables were normally distributed and mean differences tested
by paired t-test.
b
The variables were not normally distributed and differences tested by
Wilcoxon test.
CHART-SF: Craig Handicap Assessment and Reporting Technique
Short Form.
203
204
X. Hu et al.
discharge. The authors conclude that low mobility was the biggest obstacle to social participation (9). The significant increase
in mobility and maintenance of baseline social integration in
our community population may be due to participation in a
SCI peer support group, which fosters social relationships and
community integration.
Re-employment after injury is a significant measure of community integration, since it is necessary to maintain economic
independence and to restore individual self-worth and overall
QoL. The re-employment rate of patients in our study, however, was still very low 1 year after discharge from primary
rehabilitation; only 15.4% (4 cases) had returned to work, a
lower percentage than reported in other studies. In a much
larger sample of SCI patients in Turkey, a re-employment rate
of 21% in patients who had returned to the community for 1
year was reported (31). A survey conducted by Liu et al. (17)
in Tangshan SCI survivors showed that 23.1% were employed
26 years after the earthquake (74.1% before injury). Most of
these patients were employed either in maintenance positions
or private business. Possible reasons for the low employment
rate in our study include the low employment rate of these
SCI patients prior to the earthquake due to advanced age, the
lack of available community-based vocational rehabilitation
services, and the relatively short time since injury. Berkowitz
et al. (32) reported, for example, that SCI patients resumed
full-time employment approximately 6.3 years after their
injury. Therefore, the relatively reduced time since injury of
2.5 years may have contributed to the lower employment rate
in our study. van Velzen et al. (33) concluded that the main
factor related to return to work was the patients wheelchair
capacity at discharge, thus the subsequent rehabilitation
training plan should focus on improvement of mobility and
functional independence.
Our coordinators study showed that institution-based physical rehabilitation in SCI patients was effective in achieving
better functional rehabilitation outcomes, especially in ADL
independence1. From the present study, we can deduce that
rehabilitation training can also optimize QoL and social participation in SCI patients, increasing their independence and
inclusion in society. Participants in this study received rehabilitative therapies, including strength, aerobic, ambulation and
balance training as well as training in ADL. Notwithstanding
the lack of a control group of SCI earthquake survivors without
rehabilitation treatment, this case-control study demonstrated
statistical improvement in participant functional status dimensions of ADL and walking, total QoL and social participation/
community integration areas of physical independence and
mobility. The lack of further improvement may in part be due to
incomplete adherence to the prescribed rehabilitation therapy
programme, especially in the community.
Limitations of this study include the small sample size and
inclusion of participants only from the Mianzhu region of the
Li YQ, Reinhardt JD, Gosney J, Zhang X, Hu XR, Chen SJ, et al.
Functional outcomes of physical rehabilitation and medical complications
of spinal cord injury victims of the Sichuan earthquake. J Rehabil Med
Submitted.
J Rehabil Med 44
REFERENCES
1. Dijkers MP. Quality of life of individuals with spinal cord injury: a
review of conceptualization, measurement, and research findings.
J Rehabil Res Dev 2005; 42: 87110.
2. Whiteneck GG, Bogner JA, Heinemann AW. Advancing the
measurement of participation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2010; 92:
540541.
3. Rathore FA, Farooq F, Muzammil S, New PW, Ahmad N, Haig AJ.
Spinal cord injury management and rehabilitation: highlights and
shortcomings from the 2005 earthquake in Pakistan. Arch Phys
Med Rehabil 2008; 89: 579585.
4. Li JJ, Gao F, Liu SJ. [Treatment and rehabilitation of patients
with spinal cord injury after earthquake.] Chin J Rehabil Theory
Practice 2008; 14: 602605 (in Chinese).
5. Liu SG, Li JA, Wang HX, Wang BB, Xiao MY, Zhang X, et al.
[Community based rehabilitation needs for the earthquake victims
in Sichuan-Mianzhu.] Chin J Phys Med Rehabil 2011; 33: 5961
205
20. Pang MY, Eng JJ, Lin KH, Tang PF, Hung C, Wang YH. Association of depression and pain interference with disease-management
self-efficacy in community-dwelling individuals with spinal cord
injury. J Rehabil Med 2009; 41: 10681073.
21. Chan SCC, Chan APC. Rehabilitation outcomes following traumatic spinal cord injury in a teriary spinal cord injury centre: a
comparison with an international standard. Spinal Cord 2005;
43: 489498.
22. Amatachaya S, Thaweewannakij T, Adirek-udomrat J, Siritaratiwat
W. Factors related to obstacle crossing in independent ambulatory patients with spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med 2010;
33: 144149.
23. Putzke JD, Richards JS, Bret L, Hicken MA, DeVivo MJ. Predictors of life satisfaction: A spinal cord injury cohort study. Arch
Phys Med Rehabil 2002; 83: 555561.
24. Rathore MF, Rashid P, Butt AW, Malik AA, Gill ZA, Haig AJ. Epidemiology of spinal cord injuries in the 2005 Pakistan earthquake.
Spinal Cord 2007; 45: 658663.
25. Fuhrer MJ, Rintala DH, Hart KA, Clearman R, Young ME. Relationship of life satisfaction to impairment, disability, and handicap
among persons with spinal cord injury living in the community.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1992; 73: 552557.
26. Li S, Rao LL, Ren XP, Bai XW, Zheng R, Li JZ, et al. Psychological Typhoon Eye in the 2008 Wenchuan Earthquake. PLoS ONE
2009; 4: 4964.
27. Yun K, Lurie N, Hyde PS. Moving mental health into the disasterpreparedness spotlight. N Engl J Med 2010; 363: 11931195.
28. Schwartz CE, Sprangers MAG. Methodological approaches for
assessing response shift in longitudinal health-related quality-oflife research. Social Sci Med 1999; 48: 15311548.
29. Schwartz CE. Applications of response shift theory and methods to
participation measurement: a brief history of a young field. Arch
Phys Med Rehabil 2010; 91: 3843.
30. Barker RN, Kendall MD, Masters DI, KJ, Haines TP, Kuipers P.
The relationship between quality of life and disability across the
lifespan for people with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 2009;
47: 149155.
31. Gunduz B, Erhan B, Bardak AN. Employment among spinal cord
injured patients living in Turkey: a cross-sectional study. Int J
Rehabil Res 2010; 33: 275278.
32. Berkowitz M, OLeary OJ, Kruse DL. Spinal cord injury: an
analysis of medical and social costs. New York: Demos Medical
Publishing; 1998.
33. van Velzen JM, van Leeuwen CM, de Groot S, van der Woude LH,
Faber WX, Post MW. Return to work five years after spinal cord
injury inpatient rehabilitation: Is it related to wheelchair capacity
at discharge? J Rehabil Med 2012; 44: 7379.
34. Dong ZH, Yang ZG, Chen TW, Feng YC, Wang QL, Chu ZG.
Spinal injuries in the Sichuan earthquake. N Engl J Med 2009;
361: 636637.
J Rehabil Med 44