Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 2

Federal Register / Vol. 71, No.

15 / Tuesday, January 24, 2006 / Notices 3875

applicable vessel inspection laws and would occur at Champlain, New York; In a General Notice published in the
can be subject to enforcement action. Detroit, Michigan; Laredo, Texas; Otay Federal Register (70 FR 60096) on
Dated: January 13, 2006. Mesa, California; and Port Huron, October 14, 2005, CBP announced that
Craig E. Bone, Michigan, on dates to be announced. the test was to be further deployed in a
The notice stated that the Bureau of cluster of ports, in the State of
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting
Assistant Commandant for Prevention. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) Michigan, no earlier than the dates
would announce the implementation indicated as follows (all in the year
[FR Doc. E6–754 Filed 1–23–06; 8:45 am]
and sequencing of truck manifest 2005): Windsor Tunnel, October 4;
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
functionality at these ports as they occur Barge Transport, October 5; Ambassador
and further stated that additional Bridge, October 7; Port Huron, October
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND participants and ports would be selected 14; Marine City, October 18; Algonac,
SECURITY throughout the duration of the test. The October 18; and Sault St. Marie, October
test is to be expanded eventually to 28. No port in this cluster was
Bureau of Customs and Border include ACE Truck Carrier Account designated as a ‘‘model port.’’
Protection participants at all land border ports, and
subsequent releases of ACE will include New Clusters
Automated Commercial Environment all modes of transportation. Through this notice, CBP announces
(ACE): National Customs Automation the next two clusters of ports to be
Implementation of the Test
Program Test of Automated Truck brought up for purposes of
Manifest for Truck Carrier Accounts; The test commenced in Blaine, implementation of the test. The test will
Deployment Schedule Washington in December 2004, but not be deployed at the following cluster of
at Buffalo, New York. In light of ports no earlier than January 2006: Eagle
AGENCY: Customs and Border Protection; experience with the implementation of Pass, Texas and Del Rio, Texas. The test
Department of Homeland Security. the test in Blaine, Washington, CBP will also be deployed no earlier than
ACTION: General notice. decided to change the implementation January 2006 at the following cluster of
schedule and published a General ports: Brownsville, Texas; Pharr, Texas;
SUMMARY: The Bureau of Customs and
Notice in the Federal Register on May Progresso, Texas; Rio Grande City,
Border Protection, in conjunction with
31, 2005 (70 FR 30964) announcing the Texas; and Roma, Texas. No ports in
the Department of Transportation,
changes. these clusters are designated as ‘‘model
Federal Motor Carrier Safety As noted in the May 31, 2005, General
Administration, is currently conducting ports.’’
Notice, the next deployment sites will
a National Customs Automation be brought up as clusters. In some Previous NCAP Notices Not Concerning
Program (NCAP) test concerning the instances, one site in the cluster will be Deployment Schedules
transmission of automated truck identified as the ‘‘model site’’ or ‘‘model
manifest data. This document On Monday, March 21, 2005, a
port’’ for the cluster. This deployment General Notice was published in the
announces the next two groups, or strategy will allow for more efficient
clusters, of ports to be deployed for this Federal Register (70 FR 13514)
equipment set-up, site checkouts, port announcing a modification to the NCAP
test. briefings and central training. test to clarify that all relevant data
DATES: Effective Dates: The ports The ports identified belonging to the elements are required to be submitted in
identified in this notice, in the state of first cluster announced in the May 31, the automated truck manifest
Texas, are expected to deploy in two 2005, notice included the original port submission. That notice did not
clusters no earlier than January 2006, as of implementation: Blaine, Washington. announce any change to the deployment
provided in this notice. Comments Sumas, Washington, was designated as schedule and is not affected by
concerning this notice and all aspects of the model port. The other ports of publication of this notice. All
the announced test may be submitted at deployment in the cluster included the requirements and aspects of the test, as
any time during the test period. following: Point Roberts, WA; Oroville, set forth in the September 13, 2004
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. WA (including sub ports); Boundary, notice, as modified by the March 21,
James Swanson via e-mail at WA; Danville, WA; Ferry, WA; Frontier, 2005 notice, continue to be applicable.
James.Swanson@dhs.gov. WA; Laurier, WA; Metaline Falls, WA;
Dated: January 12, 2006.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Nighthawk, WA; and Lynden, WA.
In a notice published in the Federal William S. Heffelfinger III,
Background Register (70 FR 43892) on July 29, 2005, Acting Assistant Commissioner, Office of
The National Customs Automation CBP announced that the test was being Field Operations.
Program (NCAP) test concerning the further deployed, in two clusters, at [FR Doc. 06–620 Filed 1–23–06; 8:45 am]
transmission of automated truck ports in the States of Arizona and North BILLING CODE 9111–14–P
manifest data for truck carrier accounts Dakota. CBP stated that the test would
was announced in a General Notice be deployed at the following ports in
published in the Federal Register (69 Arizona as of July 25, 2005: Douglas, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
FR 55167) on September 13, 2004. That AZ; Naco, AZ; Lukeville, AZ; Sasabe, SECURITY
notice stated that the test of the AZ; and Nogales, AZ. Douglas, AZ was
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration
Automated Truck Manifest would be designated as the model port. The test
Services
conducted in a phased approach, with was also to be deployed, according to
primary deployment scheduled for no information provided in the notice, at Agency Information Collection
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with NOTICES1

earlier than November 29, 2004. The the following ports in North Dakota as Activities: Extension of a Currently
document identified the ports of Blaine, of August 15, 2005: Pembina, ND; Approved Information Collection;
Washington, and Buffalo, New York, as Neche, ND; Noyes, ND; Walhalla, ND; Comment Request
the original deployment sites. Maida, ND; Hannah, ND; Sarles, ND;
The September 13, 2004, notice stated and Hansboro, ND. Pembina, ND, was ACTION: 30-Day Notice of Information
that subsequent deployment of the test designated as the model port. Collection Under Review; Monthly

VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:44 Jan 23, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00061 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\24JAN1.SGM 24JAN1
3876 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 15 / Tuesday, January 24, 2006 / Notices

Report Naturalization Papers; Form N– (1) Type of Information Collection: DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
4. OMB Control No. 1615–0051. Extension of an existing information SECURITY
collection.
The Department of Homeland U.S. Citizenship and Immigration
(2) Title of the Form/Collection:
Security, U.S. Citizenship and Services
Monthly Report Naturalization Papers.
Immigration Services (USCIS) has
submitted the following information (3) Agency form number, if any, and Agency Information Collection
collection request to the Office of the applicable component of the Activities: Extension of a Currently
Management and Budget (OMB) for Department of Homeland Security Approved Information Collection;
review and clearance in accordance sponsoring the collection: Form N–4; Comment Request
with the Paperwork Reduction Act of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration
1995. The information collection was ACTION: 30-Day Notice of Information
Services.
previously published in the Federal Collection Under Review; USCIS Case
(4) Affected public who will be asked Status Service Online; OMB Control
Register on November 22, 2005, at 70 or required to respond, as well as a brief
FR 70631. The notice allowed for a 60- Number 1615–0080.
abstract: Primary: Federal, State or local
day public comment period. No The Department of Homeland
Governments. Section 339 of the
comments were received on this Security, U.S. Citizenship and
Immigration and Nationality Act (Act)
information collection. Immigration Services (USCIS) has
requires that the clerk of each court that
The purpose of this notice is to allow administers the oath of allegiance notify submitted the following information
an additional 30 days for public collection request to the Office of
the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration
comments. Comments are encouraged Management and Budget (OMB) for
Services (USCIS) of all persons to whom
and will be accepted until February 23, review and clearance in accordance
the oath of allegiance for naturalization
2006. This process is conducted in with the Paperwork Reduction Act of
accordance with 5 CFR 1320.10. is administered, within 30 days after the
1995. The information collection was
close of the month in which the oath
Written comments and/or suggestions previously published in the Federal
was administered. This form provides a Register on November 22, 2005, at 70
regarding the item(s) contained in this
format for submitting a list of those FR 70631. The notice allowed for a 60-
notice, especially regarding the
persons to USCIS and provides day public comment period. No
estimated public burden and associated
response time, should be directed to the accountability for the delivery of the comments were received on this
Department of Homeland Security certificates of naturalization as required information collection.
(DHS), USCIS, Director, Regulatory under that section of law. The purpose of this notice is to allow
Management Division, Clearance Office, (5) An estimate of the total number of an additional 30 days for public
111 Massachusetts Avenue, 3rd floor, respondents and the amount of time comments. Comments are encouraged
Washington, DC 20529. Comments may estimated for an average respondent to and will be accepted until February 23,
also be submitted to DHS via facsimile respond: 160 respondents at 12 2006. This process is conducted in
to 202–272–8352 or via e-mail at responses annually at 30 minutes (.50) accordance with 5 CFR 1320.10.
rfs.regs@dhs.gov. When submitting per response. Written comments and/or suggestions
comments by e-mail please make sure to regarding the item(s) contained in this
(6) An estimate of the total public notice, especially regarding the
add OMB Control Number 1615–0051 in
burden (in hours) associated with the estimated public burden and associated
the subject box. Written comments and
suggestions from the public and affected collection: 960 annual burden hours. response time, should be directed to the
agencies should address one or more of If you have additional comments, Department of Homeland Security
the following four points: suggestions, or need a copy of the (DHS), USCIS, Director, Regulatory
(1) Evaluate whether the collection of proposed information collection Management Division, Clearance Office,
information is necessary for the proper instrument with instructions, or 111 Massachusetts Avenue, 3rd floor,
performance of the functions of the additional information, please visit the Washington, DC 20529. Comments may
agency, including whether the USCIS Web site at: http://uscis.gov/ also be submitted to DHS via facsimile
information will have practical utility; graphics/formsfee/forms/pra/index.htm. to 202–272–8352 or via e-mail at
rfs.regs@dhs.gov. When submitting
(2) Evaluate the accuracy of the If additional information is required comments by e-mail please make sure to
agencies estimate of the burden of the contact: USCIS, Regulatory Management add OMB Control Number 1615–0080 in
collection of information, including the Division, 111 Massachusetts Avenue, the subject box. Written comments and
validity of the methodology and 3rd Floor, Washington, DC 20529, (202) suggestions from the public and affected
assumptions used; 272–8377. agencies should address one or more of
(3) Enhance the quality, utility, and the following four points:
Dated: January 17, 2006.
clarity of the information to be (1) Evaluate whether the collection of
collected; and Richard A. Sloan,
information is necessary for the proper
(4) Minimize the burden of the Director, Regulatory Management Division,
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services.
performance of the functions of the
collection of information on those who agency, including whether the
are to respond, including through the [FR Doc. 06–560 Filed 1–23–06; 8:45 am]
information will have practical utility;
use of appropriate automated, BILLING CODE 4410–10–P
(2) Evaluate the accuracy of the
electronic, mechanical, or other agencies estimate of the burden of the
technological collection techniques or
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with NOTICES1

collection of information, including the


other forms of information technology, validity of the methodology and
e.g., permitting electronic submission of assumptions used;
responses. (3) Enhance the quality, utility, and
Overview of this information clarity of the information to be
collection: collected; and

VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:44 Jan 23, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00062 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\24JAN1.SGM 24JAN1

Вам также может понравиться