Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Primary
functionality lost
8 Insufficient signal
from the human
walking in
O
c
c
u
r
Potential Design
Cause(s) of
Failure
Mechanism
4 Signal
amplification is
not sufficient
(beta value
needs to be
higher)
Current Design
Controls
Calculations and
design review.
D
e
t
Recommended
Action(s)
0
192 Test for higher
Identify the
current design
controls.
Identify the potential design
cause(s) of the failure
mechanism(s).
R
P
N
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Responsibility &
Target Completion
Date
Actions Taken
New RPN
Potential
Mechanism(s) of
Failure
New Det
S
Potential Failure Potential Effect(s)
e
Mode(s)
of Failure
v
New Occ
Item / Function
New Sev
Action Results
0
Design team
64
0
Risk Priority Number - The combined weighting of Severity,
Occurrence, and Detection. RPN = Sev X Occ X Det0
0
Action Results
Item / Function
Potential Failure
Mode(s)
Potential Effect(s)
of Failure
SUPPLY
1 PHASE
FAILURE
PRODUCTION/HR IS
LESS
SUPPLY
2 PHASE
FAILURE
SAFETY HAZARD
(OPERATOR CAN BE
INJURED)
MOTOR
TEMP RISE IN
MOTOR
OVER LOAD
INVERTER
POWER
ELECTRONIC
DEVICE
CONNECTION
FAILURE
S
e
v
Potential Mechanism(s) of
Failure
9 PHASE TO GROUND
O
c
c
u
r
D
e
t
R
P
N
Recommended
Action(s)
8 PHASE TO GROUND
REDUCE CURRENT
432
10 NO ROTATION OF
MOTOR
7 NO ROTATION OF
MOTOR
420
10 WINDING FAILURE
8 WINDING FAILURE
THERMISTOR NEEDS
TO BE CHECKED
640
3 PROBLEM IN
ESTIMATION
CHECK FOR
CONNECTIVITY
30
2 PROBLEM IN
ESTIMATION
Actions Taken
Design team
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
287821265.xls
printed on 09/26/2015
page 2 of 7
Action Results
Item / Function
Potential Failure
Mode(s)
Potential Effect(s)
of Failure
S
e
v
Potential Mechanism(s) of
Failure
O
c
c
u
r
D
e
t
R
P
N
Recommended
Action(s)
Actions Taken
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
287821265.xls
printed on 09/26/2015
page 3 of 7
Wear Out
External Environment
Varying external temp such as in kitchens (FM 1.2)
Input
Signals
Human movement
Power supply
PIR sensing
system
Error States (unintended results)
Control Factors
Controller (uC)
System Interaction
uC unable to drive the switching system(FM 1.1)
Insufficient amplification of the input signal from sensor (FM1.1)
Effect
Severity of Effect
Ranking
Hazardous without
warning
10
Hazardous with
warning
Very High
High
Moderate
Low
Very Low
Minor
Very Minor
None
4
3
2
1
Severity
Occurrence:
Probability of Failure
Very High: Failure is almost inevitable
High: Repeated failures
Moderate: Occasional failures
Occurrence
Failure Rates*
(within 1 year of service)
> 1 in
1 in
1 in
1 in
1 in
1 in
1 in
1 in
1 in
< 1 in
2
3
8
20
80
400
2,000
15,000
150,000
1,500,000
Ranking
0.5
0.333
0.125
0.05
0.0125
0.0025
0.0005
6.66666666667E-005
6.66666666667E-006
6.66666666667E-007
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
Detection
Absolute
Design control will not or cannot detect potential design cause
Uncertainty and subsequent failure mechanism, or there is no design
control.
Very Remote Very remote chance the design control will detect potential
design cause and subsequent mechanism mode.
Likelihood of
Ranking
Detection
< 1%
10
1% - 5%
Detection
Remote
5% - 15%
Very Low
Very low chance the design control will detect potential design
cause and subsequent failure mechanism.
15% - 30%
Low
30% - 50%
Moderate
50% - 75%
Moderately
High
75% - 85%
High
85% - 93%
Very High
Very high chance the design control will detect potential design
cause and subsequent failure mechanism.
93% - 99%
Almost
Certain
>99 %
failure mechanism.