Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
REVIEW
Jeroen S. Dickschat*
Covering: up to 2013
This review gives a modern methodic overview of how volatile natural products from various sources such
as plants, animals, bacteria and fungi can be trapped and how compound identication can be performed
even in cases of very low yields or within highly complex compound mixtures. A detailed discussion is
Received 28th August 2013
presented on how a structural proposal for an unknown analyte can be derived from GC-MS data.
Furthermore, the application of trace analytical techniques in biosynthetic studies with isotopically
DOI: 10.1039/c3np70080a
labelled compounds is presented, including a discussion of the pros and cons of dierent kinds of stable
www.rsc.org/npr
1
2
3
3.1
3.2
3.2.1
3.2.2
3.2.3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Introduction
Sampling techniques
Interpretation of EI mass spectra
The molecular ion
Fragment ions
Fragmentations with the cleavage of one bond
Fragmentations with the cleavage of two bonds
Multistep fragmentation mechanisms
Retention time and retention index
Examples of GC-MS based structure elucidation
Feeding experiments
Conclusions and outlook
Acknowledgements
References
Introduction
Review
this review are (I) how a structure for an unknown volatile can be
proposed based on GC-MS data, and (II) how GC-MS can eciently be used in biosynthetic feeding experiments that are
grounded on the usage of isotopic labellings. Rather than being
comprehensive which is nearly impossible due to the large
number of investigations on volatile natural products such as
(insect) pheromones, aroma constituents of (ouring) plants,
and volatiles from bacteria and fungi, in this article an eort has
been made to present a selection of historically interesting and
most recent work. In particular, no attempt has been made to
cover the extremely large number of more than 3000 reports on
volatile plant constituents in essential oils.9
Recent previous reviews on volatile natural products
summarise the work on bacterial volatiles,10 plant volatiles,11
halogenated volatiles from marine algae,12 biosynthetic pathways to volatiles in plants,13 and the importance of volatiles in
soil ecosystems.14
2 Sampling techniques
The principle setups of two important sampling techniques for
the collection of volatiles from various biological probes are
shown in Fig. 1. The closed-loop stripping apparatus (CLSA) was
originally developed by Grob and Z
urcher for stripping of
volatiles from aqueous solutions,15 but can easily be modied
for the investigation of volatiles released by biological
samples,16 such as bacterial or fungal agar plate cultures
(Fig. 1A).17,18 Even volatiles from plants,16 insects,16 mites,19 and
spiders20 have been collected by use of a CLSA. The method is
based on a closed system in which a continuous air stream is
circulated. The air stream is directed through a small chamber
containing the biological sample and then through a charcoal
lter for trapping of any emitted volatiles. Aer a collection time
of several hours up to one day the charcoal lter is removed and
the absorbed volatiles are eluted with an organic solvent, e.g.,
dichloromethane. The obtained headspace extract can then be
Jeroen S. Dickschat studied
chemistry at TU Braunschweig. In
2005 he obtained his PhD under
the guidance of Prof. Stefan
Schulz, working on bacterial
volatiles and terpene biosynthesis as a fellow of the Fonds der
Chemischen Industrie. Aer a
postdoctoral stay at the Universit
at des Saarlandes with Prof.
Rolf M
uller he moved to the lab of
Prof. Peter Leadlay at the
University of Cambridge (UK) as
a fellow of the Deutsche Akademie der Naturforscher Leopoldina.
Since 2008 he is a group leader and Emmy Noether fellow at TU
Braunschweig. His research interests include biosynthetic pathways
to secondary metabolites, the identication and structure elucidation of new natural products, and their total syntheses, cumulating
in his habilitation in 2013.
NPR
Schematic view of sampling techniques for volatiles. A) Closedloop stripping apparatus (CLSA), and B) solid phase micro-extraction
(SPME).
Fig. 1
NPR
Review
3.1
Fig. 2
Review
NPR
Formula
m/z 164
m/z 165
m/z 166
C12H20
C11H16O
C10H12O2
C9H8O3
C8H4O4
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
13.3%
12.2%
11.1%
10.0%
8.9%
0.8%
0.8%
0.9%
1.0%
1.1%
Fragment ions
NPR
Review
Formula
m/z 108
m/z 109
m/z 110
C8H12
C7H8O
C6H4O2
C6H8N2
C4H4N4
C5H4N2O
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
8.8%
7.7%
6.6%
7.3%
5.8%
6.2%
0.3%
0.4%
0.6%
0.2%
0.1%
0.3%
Scheme 2
bond.
Review
Fig. 3
NPR
NPR
Review
3.2.2
Scheme 3
Scheme 4
cleavage.
Review
NPR
Scheme 5
bonds.
Scheme 6
NPR
Review
the synthesis of two pyrazines, 3-methoxy-2-(1-methylpropyl)-5(2-methylpropyl)pyrazine and 3-methoxy-2,5-bis(1-methylpropyl)pyrazine, for comparison to volatiles emitted by
C. crocatus.73 Due to the published mass spectra these
compounds could also be identied as bacterial attractants for
the pineapple beetle Carpophilus humeralis.77
3.2.3
including 2,5-diisobutylpyrazine (39) was identied in Paenibacillus polymyxa.72 All alkylated pyrazines with side chains
longer than two carbons for which McLaerty rearrangements
via a six-membered transition state are possible exhibited the
expected McLaerty fragment ions in high intensity, usually
resulting in the base peak of the mass spectrum. Various
alkylated pyrazines have also been detected in the headspace
extracts of the myxobacteria Chondromyces crocatus and Nannocystis exedens,73,74 and the actinobacterium Corynebacterium
glutamicum.75 Structural suggestions for these compounds
were derived by interpretation of their EI mass spectra that
likewise were dominated by McLaerty ions in the cases of
alkyl substituents of a chain length of more than two carbons.
However, since the substitution pattern of di-, tri-, and tetraalkylpyrazines cannot be derived from the mass spectrum, all
structural suggestions were unambiguously proven by
synthesis of reference compounds. Dierentiating between
the various constitutional isomers of alkylated pyrazines is
also a perfect example of a problem that could be solved by
comparison of the analyte's mass spectrum to database
spectra, but for unambiguous compound identication the
mass spectra of all constitutional isomers should ideally be
available. If this is not the case, it cannot be excluded that an
isomer that is not included in the database may have a very
similar mass spectrum to a compound that is included. In
extreme cases this may require the synthesis of all possible
isomers, as was recently performed for the identication of
two chlorinated anisole derivatives from the fungus
Geniculosporium.76
If mass spectra of unidentied volatile compounds are
communicated in the original work, this may in some cases
assist in the later identication by synthesis of reference
compounds in a totally dierent context. An example is given by
Review
NPR
Scheme 9
tR tR;n
:
tR;n1 tR;n
NPR
Review
Review
cyclases.
Scheme 13
NPR
NPR
Review
Review
NPR
NPR
Review
Table 3
Position i
Mei
Position i
Mei
2 or u1
3 or u2
4 or u3
5 or u4
6 or u5
60
73
56
46
40
7 or u6
8 or u7
9 or u8
10 or u9
36
33
31
28
Feeding experiments
Review
NPR
C-10 and one hydrogen from C-13 to yield (10E,12Z)-hexadecadienoic acid (95) and reduction to bombykol.
This successful labelling study promoted a series of similar
GC-MS based feeding experiments on biosynthetic pathways to
insect pheromones. It was shown by feeding of [16,16,16-2H3]palmitic acid (93, deuterated positions marked by asterisks)
that the biosynthesis of the sex pheromones from Agrotis
segetum, (7Z)-dodecenyl acetate (104), (9Z)-tetradecenyl acetate
(103), and (11Z)-hexadecenyl acetate (102), proceeds by introduction of the (Z)-double bond to yield 94 (Scheme 17).137 Its
reduction to the alcohol and acetylation results in 102, while
the shorter derivatives 103 and 104 require a chain degradation by b-oxidations of 94 prior to reduction and acetylation.
Similar results were obtained for the biosynthesis of 102 by
feeding [13,13,14,14,15,15,16,16,16-2H9]-93 to Mamestra
brassicae.138
The biosyntheses of all four compounds 96 and 102104
starts with a D11-(Z)-desaturation that is a key step in the
formation of a large number of lepidopteran pheromones.
Boland and coworkers have shown in a series of elegant
experiments that introduction of the (Z)-double bond by the
D11-desaturases from three investigated lepidopterae, M. brassicae, B. mori, and Manduca sexta, proceeds via a syn elimination
of C(11)-HR and C(12)-HR (Scheme 18).139 Feeding of (11S,12R)[2H14]-93 to M. brassicae resulted in the incorporation of twelve
deuterium atoms into the insect pheromone 102, as determined
by GC-MS, while a complementary feeding experiment with
(11R,12S)-[2H14]-93 resulted in the retention of all fourteen
deuterium atoms in labelled 102.139 The same stereochemical
course was found for the reaction of 93 to 94 in B. mori and
NPR
Review
Scheme 18
Review
NPR
NPR
Review
beetle Stenus bimaculatus.150 Incorporation of deuterated isotopomers of L-lysine (124), L-leucine, and sodium acetate suggested the biosynthetic pathway shown in Scheme 22.
Decarboxylation and transamination of 124 results in the amino
aldehyde 125, which is cyclised to the imine 126. The corresponding enamine 127 undergoes nucleophilic attack to the
isoleucine-derived aldehyde 128, forming the condensation
product 129, which is subsequently reduced to 130. Acetylation,
most likely with acetyl-CoA, yields the acetamide 131 that is
reduced to stenusine. The study also contained a detailed
analysis of mass spectral fragmentations to locate the sites of
incorporation.
As discussed for several examples in this article so far, the
strongest advantage of using deuterated precursors is the
possibility of gas chromatographic separation of deuterated
volatiles from their natural analogs, allowing the localisation of
deuterium incorporation, if fragmentation reactions for the
analyte are known or are at least very plausible following the
reactions as discussed in chapter 3. This method has its limits,
where the fragmentation reactions are unclear, or two or more
alternative fragmentations resulting in the same fragment ion
are possible. An example is given by the fragmentation mechanism of the base peak ion at m/z 95 for the musty odorant
2-methylisoborneol (41), for which two alternative terminal
a-cleavages with loss of stereochemical distinct methyl groups
are possible (Scheme 10). One of these methyl groups originates from the methyl group in the terpene precursor mevalonolactone (133) (in case of the myxobacterium Nannocystis
exedens that uses the mevalonate pathway to terpenes) or
from C-1 in deoxyxylulose phosphate (134) (in case of most
streptomycetes using the deoxyxylulose phosphate pathway,
Fig. 9 Mass spectra and important fragment ions of A) 9-methyldecan-3-one (36), B) [2H9]-36 after feeding of [2H10]leucine, C) [2H3]36 after feeding of [2H5]propionic acid, and D) superimposed mass
spectra of 36, [13C2]-36, and [13C4]-36 after feeding of [13C2]acetic
acid. Asterisks indicate labelled positions.
the deprotonation induced fragmentation of hydroperoxyeicosatetraenoic acid proceeds with stereospecic loss of
the pro-R hydrogen at C-16. This nding was in agreement with
previous investigations on the stereochemical course of the
reaction in Gomphonema parvulum.149
A recent example for a biosynthetic study on an alkaloid by
feeding of isotopically labelled precursors followed by GC-MS
analysis of incorporation is given by stenusine (132) from the
Review
NPR
Scheme 22
bimaculatus.
NPR
Review
Review
8 Acknowledgements
References
NPR
26 B. Sch
afer, P. Hennig and W. Engewald, J. High Resolut.
Chromatogr., 1995, 18, 587592.
27 D. C. Robacker and R. J. Bartelt, J. Chem. Ecol., 1997, 23,
28972915.
28 N. L. Brock, C. A. Citron, C. Zell, M. Berger, I. WagnerD
obler, J. Petersen, T. Brinkho, M. Simon and
J. S. Dickschat, Beilstein J. Org. Chem., 2013, 9, 942950.
29 R. J. Bartelt, Anal. Chem., 1997, 69, 364372.
30 D. Joulain and W. A. K
onig, The atlas of spectral data of
sesquiterpene hydrocarbons, E. B. Verlag, Hamburg, 1998.
31 R. P. Adams, Identication of essential oil components by gas
chromatography/mass spectrometry, Allured, Carol Stream,
2009.
32 P. Sobik, J. Grunenberg, K. B
or
oczky, H. Laatsch, I. WagnerD
obler and S. Schulz, J. Org. Chem., 2007, 72, 37763782.
33 C.-C. Chen and C.-T. Ho, J. Agric. Food Chem., 1986, 34, 830
833.
34 J. S. Dickschat, C. Zell and N. L. Brock, ChemBioChem, 2010,
11, 417425.
35 R. Burra, G. A. Pradenas, R. A. Montes, C. C. Vasquez and
T. G. Chasteen, Anal. Biochem., 2010, 396, 217222.
36 F. W. McLaerty and F. Turecek, Interpretation of mass
spectra, University Science Books, Mill Valley, 4th edn, 1993.
37 H. E. Audier, Org. Mass Spectrom., 1969, 2, 283298.
38 J. S. Dickschat, H. Bruns and R. Riclea, Beilstein J. Org.
Chem., 2011, 7, 16971712.
39 R. Ryhage and E. Stenhagen, Ark. Kemi, 1960, 15, 291315.
40 J. S. Dickschat, H. B. Bode, S. C. Wenzel, R. M
uller and
S. Schulz, ChemBioChem, 2005, 6, 20232033.
41 D. M
uller-Schwarze, Nature, 1969, 223, 525526.
42 J. S. Dickschat, I. Wagner-D
obler and S. Schulz, J. Chem.
Ecol., 2005, 31, 925947.
43 W. S. Leal, Naturwissenschaen, 1993, 80, 181183.
44 G. W. Francis and K. Veland, J. Chromatogr., A, 1987, 219,
379384.
45 H.-R. Buser, H. Arn, P. Guerin and S. Rauscher, Anal. Chem.,
1983, 55, 818822.
46 B. A. Leonhardt and E. D. DeVilbiss, J. Chromatogr., A, 1985,
322, 484490.
47 J. S. Dickschat, E. Helmke and S. Schulz, Chem. Biodiversity,
2005, 2, 318353.
48 Y. Murata, H. J. C. Yeh, L. K. Pannel, T. H. Jones, H. M. Fales
and R. T. Mason, J. Nat. Prod., 1991, 54, 233240.
49 W. W. Christie, E. Y. Brechany and V. K. S. Shukla, Lipids,
1989, 24, 116120.
50 P. Scribe, J. Guezennec, J. Dagaut, C. Pepe and A. Saliot,
Anal. Chem., 1988, 60, 928931.
51 E. Dunkelblum, S. H. Tan and P. J. Silk, J. Chem. Ecol., 1985,
11, 265277.
52 S. Schulz, W. Francke and M. Boppr
e, Biol. Chem. HoppeSeyler, 1988, 369, 633638.
53 C. W. Moss and M. A. Lambert-Fair, J. Clin. Microbiol., 1989,
27, 14671470.
54 A. A. Coss
e, R. J. Bartelt, D. G. James and R. J. Petroski,
J. Chem. Ecol., 2001, 27, 18411853.
55 A. B. Attygalle, G. N. Jham and J. Meinwald, Anal. Chem.,
1993, 65, 25282533.
NPR
Review
85 D. Joulain and W. A. K
onig, The atlas of spectral data of
sesquiterpene hydrocarbons, E. B. Verlag, Hamburg, 1998.
86 R. P. Adams, Identication of essential oil components by gas
chromatography/mass spectrometry, Allured, Carol Stream,
2009.
87 J. S. Dickschat, T. Martens, T. Brinkho, M. Simon and
S. Schulz, Chem. Biodiversity, 2005, 2, 837865.
88 K. Wilkins and C. Sch
oller, Actinomycetologica, 2009, 23,
2733.
89 C. H
ockelmann, P. G. Becher, S. H. von Reu and F. J
uttner,
Z. Naturforsch., 2009, 64C, 4955.
90 T. Nawrath, G. F. Mgode, B. Weetjens, S. H. E. Kaufmann
and S. Schulz, Beilstein J. Org. Chem., 2012, 8, 290299.
91 X. Lin, R. Hopson and D. E. Cane, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2006,
128, 60226023.
92 B. Zhao, X. Lin, L. Lei, D. C. Lamb, S. L. Kelly,
M. R. Waterman and D. E. Cane, J. Biol. Chem., 2008, 283,
81838189.
93 Z. You, S. Omura, H. Ikeda and D. E. Cane, Arch. Biochem.
Biophys., 2007, 459, 233240.
94 M. Kimura, T. Tokai, N. Takahashi-Ando, S. Ohsato and
M. Fujimura, Biosci., Biotechnol., Biochem., 2007, 71, 2105
2123.
95 N. L. Brock and J. S. Dickschat, ChemBioChem, 2013, 14,
11891193.
96 S.-C. Chang, Y.-H. Wei, M.-L. Liu and R.-D. Wie, Appl.
Environ. Microbiol., 1985, 49, 14551460.
97 N. L. Brock, B. Tudzynski and J. S. Dickschat,
ChemBioChem, 2011, 12, 26672676.
98 C. B
omke and B. Tudzynski, Phytochemistry, 2009, 70, 1876
1893.
99 D. E. Cane, J. K. Sohng, C. R. Lamberson, S. M. Rudnicki,
Z. Wu, M. D. Lloyd, J. S. Oliver and B. R. Hubbard,
Biochemistry, 1994, 33, 58465857.
100 X. Lin, R. Hopson and D. E. Cane, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2006,
128, 60226023.
101 S. A. Agger, F. Lopez-Gallego, T. R. Hoye and C. SchmidtDannert, J. Bacteriol., 2008, 190, 60846096.
102 W. K. W. Chou, I. Fanizza, T. Uchiyama, M. Komatsu,
H. Ikeda and D. E. Cane, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2010, 132,
88508851.
103 C. Nakano, M. H.-K. Kim and Y. Ohnishi, ChemBioChem,
2011, 12, 19881991.
104 C. Nakano, M. H.-K. Kim and Y. Ohnishi, ChemBioChem,
2011, 12, 24032407.
105 Y. Hu, W. K. W. Chou, R. Hopson and D. E. Cane, Chem.
Biol., 2011, 18, 3237.
106 C. Nakano, S. Horinouchi and Y. Ohnishi, J. Biol. Chem.,
2011, 286, 2798027987.
107 C. Nakano, T. Tezuka, S. Horinouchi and Y. Ohnishi,
J. Antibiot., 2012, 65, 551558.
108 C. Nakano, F. Kudo, T. Eguchi and Y. Ohnishi,
ChemBioChem, 2011, 12, 22712275.
109 D. E. Cane and R. M. Watt, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.,
2003, 100, 15471551.
110 J. Jiang, X. He and D. E. Cane, Nat. Chem. Biol., 2007, 3, 711
715.
Review
NPR