visible
component
of
Los
Angeles
smog.
In
the
following
we
will
look
at
some
of
the
proper-es
of
these
par-cles.
Par-cles
have
dierent
sources.
They
can
be
directly
emiAed,
for
example
by
diesel
engines,
smoke
stacks,
cooking.
Par-cles
are
also
formed
chemically
through
reac-on
that
convert
certain
hydrocarbons
into
gases
that
condense
onto
par-cles.
This
chemistry
is
closely
related
so
that
ozone
and
par-cles
oEen
have
their
highest
levels
together.
We
have
seen
this
gure
before.
It
shows
the
sizes
of
dierent
par-cles
in
the
atmosphere.
One
way
we
measure
the
amount
of
par-cles
is
by
expressing
their
weight
in
a
volume
of
air,
for
example
micro-gram
per
cubic
meter.
If
we
consider
all
par-cles
size
this
is
oEen
called
total
suspended
maAer.
We
also
have
to
consider
their
size
to
assess
their
health
eect.
As
we
have
learned
before
only
par-cles
smaller
than
2.5
um
enter
our
lung
and
are
thus
dangerous.
We
therefore
previously
dened
the
mass
concentra-on
of
par-cles
smaller
than
2.5
um
as
PM2.5.
It
has
the
same
unit
as
total
suspended
maAer.
Lets
rst
have
a
look
where
directly
emiAed
PM2.5
originates,
expressed
as
tons
per
day
and
the
percentage
contribu-on.
We
see
here
that
area
sources
dominate
this
list.
This
includes
mostly
dust
that
is
liEed
into
the
atmosphere.
Because
of
this
construc-on
sites
in
Los
Angeles
have
to
water
the
ground
to
avoid
dust
emissions.
If
you
ever
see
a
site
with
a
big
dust
cloud,
you
can
call
the
Air
Quality
Management
District
and
le
a
complaint.
They
will
then
inves-gate
and
make
sure
the
construc-on
sites
water
the
soil.
As
with
the
other
pollutants
the
emissions
of
dust
have
decreased
in
the
past
15
years,
and
will
remain
fairly
at
for
the
next
20
years
The
spa-al
distribu-on
of
Total
Suspended
MaAer
is
quite
similar
to
that
of
ozone,
with
highest
levels
on
the
east
side
of
Los
Angeles.
This
is
mostly
due
the
secondary
forma-on
of
par-cles
as
the
polluted
air
from
Los
Angeles
is
chemically
processed
as
it
travels
to
Riverside
and
San
Bernardino
county.
The
PM2.5
levels,
shown
here
as
the
maximum
annual
average,
have
steadily
decreased
over
the
years.
An
the
Los
Angeles
Basin
is
very
close
to
be
within
the
federal
air
quality
standard
regarding
PM2.5
pollu-on.
As
we
men-oned
earlier
par-cles
lead
to
a
degrada-on
of
visibility.
You
can
see
this
in
this
picture
of
Los
Angeles.
If
you
look
carefully
you
will
recognize
that
the
presence
of
the
par-cles
makes
the
picture
brighter,
but
on
the
other
hand
it
reduces
the
contrast,
so
that
you
cannot
dis-nguish
certain
parts
of
the
city.
This
observa-ons
has
been
used
for
many
years
to
dene
the
visibility.
Meteorologist
dene
visibility
through
a
length
at
which
one
can
barely
dis-nguish
a
black
target
on
a
white
surface.
This
is
shown
here.
In
the
example
on
the
top
we
see
the
clear
contrast
between
a
black
circle
and
the
white
background.
In
the
presence
of
par-cles
the
circle
will
appear
gray
and
if
there
are
too
many
par-cles
it
will
all
look
bright.
Airports
have.
for
many
years,
used
this
by
placing
targets
at
known
distances
from
the
tower,
thus
allowing
the
folks
in
the
tower
to
determine
what
the
visibility
length
is.
So
how
does
the
visibility
reduc-on
due
to
par-cles
work.
In
this
sketch
we
see
a
black
target
in
a
distance
and
an
observer
on
the
right.
We
also
see
a
sun,
which
is
important
as
this
eect
is
most
pronounced
during
the
day.
Without
par-cles
between
the
target
and
the
observer
we
can
see
the
contrast
between
black
an
white.
What
we
really
see
it
that
the
white
part
of
the
target
reects
the
sunlight,
making
it
white,
while
the
circle
does
not
reect
any
light,
thus
making
it
appear
black.
So,
no
light
comes
from
the
circle
to
the
observer.
Par-cles
between
the
observed
and
the
black
circle
scaAer
sunlight
towards
the
observer.
So
they
act
like
liAle
sources
of
light
in
front
of
the
black
circle.
This
then
makes
the
circle
appear
less
black.
If
you
add
more
par-cles
there
will
be
more
light
scaAered
to
the
observed,
making
the
circle
look
less
black.
So
the
more
par-cles
are
present
the
more
white
circle
will
look
un-l
there
is
no
contrast
between
the
circle
and
background.
Visibility,
or
more
precisely
visibility
length,
is
closely
related
to
total
suspended
maAer.
This
can
be
approximated
by
the
following
equa-ons.
The
visibility
length
in
kilometers
is
approximately
equal
to
1000
divided
by
total
suspended
maAer
in
micrograms
per
cubic
meter.
Or,
switching
things
around,
total
suspended
maAer
in
micrograms
per
cubic
meter
is
approximately
equal
to
1000
divided
by
visibility
length
in
kilometers.
For
example
for
a
totals
suspended
maAer
concentra-on
of
100
micrograms
per
cubic
meter
the
visibility
length
is
approximately
10km,
or
7miles.
This
is
not
enough
to
see
the
mountains
from
UCLA
or
downtown
Los
Angeles.