Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
6
7
8
9
10
Plaintiff,
11
CASE NO.:
COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY
JUDGMENT
v.
12
13
Defendant.
14
15
16
17
THE PARTIES
1.
18
of business at 936 N 34th St., Suite 208, Seattle, Washington 98103. Dato is a machine-
19
20
2.
Dato is informed and believes, and therefore alleges, that Datto, Inc. (Datto)
21
(pronounced Daat-toe) is a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business at 101
22
Merritt 7, 7th Floor, Norwalk, Connecticut 06851. Dato is informed and believes, and therefore
23
24
3.
This action seeks a declaration that Datos use and registration of the trademark
25
DATO do not, and will not, infringe upon or otherwise violate the trademark-related rights, if
26
any, of Datto.
27
COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT
-1-
1
2
This court has original jurisdiction over the claim for declaratory relief under
28 U.S.C. 2201 because Dato brings the action to determine a question of actual controversy
between the parties arising under the trademark laws of the United States.
5
6
5.
a substantial part of the events giving rise to this complaint occurred in this judicial district.
7
8
9
BACKGROUND
Datos Use of the DATO mark
6.
10
Amazon Professor of Machine Learning in Computer Science & Engineering at the University
11
of Washington, changed its name to Dato, Inc. to convey the full range of the companys
12
machine learning tasksnot just graph analysisand to mark the evolution of the company
13
14
7.
15
software, which engineers and data scientists use to build systems that learn to identify and
16
analyze the information in databases, from tables to graphs to text to images. These intelligent
17
18
analysis, fraud detection, churn prediction and ad targeting. Dato provides organizations of all
19
sizes and across industries with advanced big data analytics, enabling them to build scalable
20
data products quickly and gain better and faster insights from their big data.
21
22
23
8.
Dato is the owner of the Internet domain name <dato.com>, where Dato hosts a
Dato applied to register the mark DATO with the United States Patent and
24
Trademark Office on January 28, 2015, based on its bona fide intent to use the mark in
25
26
27
-2-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
Datos trademark application has been assigned Serial No. 86517116 and is pending.
10.
Since its launch in January 2015, Datos DATO mark has been featured in
14
prominent news reports and articles (Wired, The Wall Street Journal, The Seattle Times,
15
Geekwire, etc.) across the United States and internationally. In addition, DATO has achieved
16
substantial commercial success as many well-known companies already use Datos software.
17
For example, Pandora uses Datos software to help drive its music recommendation service.
18
Real estate database Zillow uses the software to fine-tune its estimates of how much properties
19
cost in the market. Johnson & Johnson uses Datos platform to help parents find important
20
pregnancy and parenting advice on their popular BabyCenter.com website. Datos other clients
21
include Salesforce, Symantec, PayPal, Crosswise, Hotel Tonight, Bosch, ExxonMobil and
22
23
11.
Datos tools have been deployed in a broad range of areas, from fraud detection
24
to analysis of customer sentiment, and have the ability to be expanded across industries and
25
tailored to very specific customer needs. The data scientists and engineers who use Datos
26
software typically have advanced degrees, have strong programming and mathematical skills,
27
and need to integrate a wide range of software tools in order to build their applications. As
COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT
-3-
such, Datos customers are highly sophisticated and purchase Datos products and services with
very particular uses in mind. They do not enter the decision to purchase such products without
12.
services, when members of the general public, particularly within the artificial intelligence and
technology industries, see or hear the mark DATO, they associate it with Datos cutting edge,
8
9
10
11
13.
Dato intends to continue using the DATO mark in connection with its platform
and services.
Dattos Assertion of Trademark Rights
14.
12
business continuity solutions. A recent Forbes article entitled Datto: The Secret Tech
13
Money-Making Machine Youve Never Heard Of describes Dattos business as the business
14
of information recovery, providing data storage hardware with a subscription service that
15
allows customers to revive their network instantly in the event it shuts down or is otherwise
16
breached.
17
15.
18
data, analyze it in various forms, and learn from it using artificial intelligence techniques,
19
Dattos business pertains to the routine backup of data. And whereas Datos customers use its
20
customizable software to mine, understand and learn from specific big data sets they have
21
acquired, Datto provides its customers with physical hardware and virtual backup devices to
22
23
16.
Datos and Dattos purchasers consist of highly trained data scientists and other
24
25
likely to research extensively the service providers they choose to analyze and to store their
26
data, both of which are integral decisions for any size company, thus making it unlikely that
27
any real-world confusion would occur. In addition, the relatively high prices of both Datos and
COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT
-4-
Dattos products do not lend themselves to impulse purchases and often require cross-
17.
On January 30, 2015, Datto sent Dato a cease and desist letter claiming
propriety rights in its DATTO mark and potential likelihood of confusion between the DATO
and DATTO marks. Datto demanded that Dato cease use of its DATO mark immediately.
18.
Dattos letter, explaining the distinct differences between the companies services, the
sophistication of their respective customers, the relatively high prices of the companies
products, all of which clearly distinguish the companies respective marks and undermine any
10
concern that the marks would be confused by those in the market looking to purchase very
11
12
19.
On April 10, 2015, Datto replied to Datos letter, claiming that it offered a range
13
of business continuity cloud services that were similar to Datos, rebuffing Datos offer to
14
co-exist, even pursuant to the terms of an agreement, and demanding that Dato immediately
15
16
20.
After further exchanges between the parties, on September 17, 2015, Datto sent
17
an email to Dato claiming that we just don't see a way your company can continue to use the
18
DATO mark without causing confusion, that [t]his back and forth has gone on long enough
19
and our position is very clear and that if Dato would not commit to stop using the DATO
20
mark by September 21, that Datto would commence appropriate legal action.
21
21.
While Datto tries to characterize its business broadly, data backup hardware and
22
remote backup are clearly distinct from artificial intelligence and data analytics. Datos
23
sophisticated customers, who can tailor its products to suit their data analytics needs,
24
understand that difference. And Dattos customers, who are in the market for data backup
25
solutions, are not going to confuse Datos customizable software for data analytics with data
26
backup hardware. Because there is no potential risk of real-world confusion, Dato intends to
27
COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT
-5-
continue use of its DATO mark and remains confident the two companies can comfortably
coexist.
(DECLARATORY RELIEF)
5
6
7
22.
between Dato and Datto as to the parties rights and legal relations associated with each partys
use of their respective marks. This controversy between the parties is substantial, concrete, and
10
immediate. Based on Dattos correspondence, Dato has a reasonable and real apprehension
11
that it faces an infringement lawsuit by Datto and that Datto will challenge and seek to disrupt
12
13
24.
Dato has and intends to continue to use the DATO mark in interstate commerce.
14
Dato is informed and believes, and therefore alleges, that it is Dattos position that Datto has
15
made use of the mark DATTO in a manner justifying Datto to sue Dato immediately for
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
25.
Datos use of the DATO mark does not infringe on or violate any federal or state
Datos use of the DATO mark will not infringe on or violate any federal or state
Datos rights to the DATO mark are superior to or distinct from the rights Datto
24
between Dato and Datto concerning the use of the DATO mark and the respective trademark
25
rights of the parties. A judicial determination is necessary and appropriate at this time in order
26
to resolve the issues of the trademark rights of Dato and the conflicting claims of Datto, and in
27
order that the parties may ascertain their respective rights and obligations if any.
COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT
-6-
29.
1
2
Dato does not engage in any activities that harm or threaten any lawful rights of
3
4
30.
That this Court declare that Datos use and registration of the DATO mark do
not infringe upon, dilute, or otherwise violate any valid right of Datto under applicable federal
or state law.
31.
9
10
11
12
That this Court declare that Datos rights in the DATO mark are superior to or
That this Court declare that Datos activities have not caused any harm to Datto
13
33.
14
34.
That, by way of further relief, this Court grant a permanent injunction enjoining
15
and restraining Datto, its officers, directors, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys, and
16
those in active concert or participation with them, from directly or indirectly charging
17
infringement, dilution, or other legal violation, or instituting any action for infringement,
18
dilution, or other violation of alleged rights of Datto in the mark DATTO against Dato or any
19
of Datos agents, direct or indirect customers, or any person, by reason of the use or registration
20
21
That this Court award to Dato its reasonable costs, disbursements, and attorneys
22
fees incurred in defending its rights to the DATO mark against the claims and allegations of
23
Datto.
24
36.
25
and proper.
That this Court grant such other and further relief as this Court may deem just
26
27
COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT
-7-
2
3
4
5
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT
-8-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT
-9-