Why have profits been deteriorating over the past several quarters?
The Fruitvale branch of Manzana actually handles property-liability insurance cases
out of which 65% of business is with Property cases and 20% deals with liability case and rest is attributed to miscellaneous specialty lines. It had come under the scanner because of declining profitability. Basically it was struggling with the poor late percentage figure and a turnaround time of almost 6 days whereas its competitor Golden Gate has a turnaround time of 2 days. The main concern of the Manzana Insurance was the declining market share and profit and the reasons for the same could be accounted majorly by the following 3 points: a) Manzana was struggling with the High Turnaround Time though it had sufficient staff, even it was overstaffed in Policy Writing and Rating department. b) Its backlog of policies had increased since 1989, and the number of new policies and endorsements appeared to be stagnating whereas others reported a moderate growth. c) The renewal loss rate was increasing uncontrollably because of the high number of late renewals and this was becoming a really pain to the agents. The other factors/procedure which were contributing to the deterioration of the company are listed below: Faulty company procedure: Though the company policy was to use FIFO system, due to prioritization for RUNs and RAPs, RAINs and RERUNs were given very low importance and the number of late RERUNs is increasing consistently over the quarters during the year 1989-1991 as shown in the exhibit 6. Poor capacity utilization Very poor capacity utilization of Rating and Underwriting team and the calculation showing only 76.27% and 82.04% which are contributing to the late processing. Uneven workload among underwriting team Among underwriting team there is uneven distribution of workload with Territory 1 UT with capacity utilization of 92.30% and Territory 3 UT with a capacity utilization of 70.84% and the workload here can be distributed properly. Increasing TAT: The number of lost renewals increasing and correspondingly increasing the TAT from 4.7 in 1989 to 6.2 in 1991(Turnaround time) as shown in exhibit 6.
Loss of business: Apparently this caused agents to recommend other insurance
firms based on TAT since the products offered by them is not differentiated and this causing customers to easily switch from one firm to another. This causes Fruitvale to lose the business. Increasing Insured losses: Increasing Insured losses over the years from 1989-1991 as in exhibit 5 is another reason for its branch profit to change from $1765 in 1 st quarter 1989 to post a loss of $121 in the 2nd quarter 1991.