Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Having the chance to read Jose Rizals novel Noli Me Tangere, looking back to all
those years of oppression that the country had suffered enough, Rizal wrote this piece to
let his fellow countrymen that this time, its our time to stand
El Filibustirismo
Reflection by: Gemelen Allyssa Olana
Reflection: I know for the fact that everyone agrees on the fact that El Filibusterismo is
far the most darkest and brutal than Noli Me Tangere.With many harsh events like
murder, sexual abuse and suicide, Truly El Filibusterismo is a massive turning point of
the sequel of the story not only for the plot but also for the characters. The protagonist
really did grow as a character in this book.He is obviously not the idealistic,typical and
open man he was once before. He morph into a vengeful, angry and in somewhat way,
cunning. And in my opinion, this transformation of his is very much human and realistic.
After everything he went through in Noli Me Tangere, it seems only fitting that he
becomes the man who is Simoun, his alter ego. I believe that when Ibarra went under
alias Simoun, he did not just strip himself of his birth name but he stripped himself of all
of what was left of Juan Crisostomo Ibarra. The way I see it, is that Ibarra is not Simoun
and Simoun is not Ibarra. They may share the same face, but Ibarra was really
unrecognizable for hatred has taken over him but if we are not speaking about physical
attributes, then the only thing they truly did have in common was love for the dear Maria
Clara. But besides that, they do not share the same mind, the same plans, the same soul,
the same heart. In terms of moral lesson, El Filibusterismo is what Id choose over Noli
Me Tangere. El Filibusterismo showed us how anger and vengeance can take over a
persons being. But like what Father Florentino said, all punishments for all people will
come when the time is right. Being a good person is rewarding. Not entirely in the sense
of blessings but in the sense that you know that you did what is good and your heart just
feels ever so light. This is the stage that Ibarra underwent in the first book. But in the
second book, he was just so tired that he ended up being a person who he most likely,
never wanted to be. At the end of the book, I believe he ended up being the man we
started with. He seemed to have no anger, he seemed to be in a state of peace. I believe
that doing your best to never tire in doing good is one of the central themes of the book.
El Filibusterismo also shares the theme that violence is not always the answer with Noli
Me Tangere.
Reflection: I believe that indolence really does exist among us the Filipinos, but
indolence is not just exclusive to us the Filipinos but it exists among the nations of the
world but it cannot be attributed to the troubles and backwardness of the Philippines;
rather it is the effect of the backwardness and troubles experienced by the country. Past
writings on indolence revolve only on either denying or affirming, and never studying its
causes in depth. One must study the causes of indolence, Rizal says, before curing it. He
therefore enumerates the causes of indolence and elaborates on the circumstances that
have led to it. The hot climate, he points out, is a reasonable predisposition for indolence.
Filipinos cannot be compared to Europeans, who live in cold countries and who must
exert much more effort at work. An hour ' s work under the Philippine sun, he says, is
equivalent to a day ' s work in temperate regions. Rizal says that an illness will worsen if
the wrong treatment is given. The same applies to indolence. People, however, should not
lose hope in fighting indolence. Even before the Spaniards arrived, Rizal argues, the early
Filipinos were already carrying out trade within provinces and with other neighboring
countries; they were also engaged in agriculture and mining; some natives even spoke
Spanish. All this disproves the notion that Filipinos are by nature indolent. Rizal ends by
asking what then would have caused Filipinos to forget their past.
I think there is nothing more to react really, its better putting Rizal in a one peso because
if Rizal was placed in a one thousand peso bill then Rizal would not be known to the
young ones today. It was a great move for the government putting our national hero in a
one peso because a thousand would never be completely be full if there is a single peso
missing. Rizal is a very important figure in our country he deserves being placed in a one
peso coin because a peso coin is very important to the young ones, learning Rizal begins
in a one peso coin.