Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Todays topics
Homogeneous nucleation for solid-solid phase transformation, and the major difference
compared to the liquid-solid phase transformation: the role played by the strain energy due
to the deformation caused by the phase transformation.
Strain energy --- the factor determining the hysteresis in phase transformation, i.e.,
supercooling (under) or superheating (above) the equilibrium temperature.
(r)
r0
(r)
16 3
2
; r* =
2
3GV
GV
Todays lecture:
GV can be expressed as :
GV =
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
(Gs 0 Gl 0 ) =
( s l ) =
[ H s TS s H l + TSl ]
VM
VM
VM
1
1
0
0
0
0
[T ( Sl S s ) ( H l H s )]
VM
At T=TM, l0(TM) = s0(TM), or Gl0(TM) = Gs0(TM) due to the solid-liquid equilibrium, then
Hl0 - TM Sl0 = Hs0 - TM Ss0 Hl0 Hs0 = TM (Sl0 -Ss0), replace this into the Eq of GV, we have
GV =
Lets define SV =
1
0
0
0
0
[T ( Sl S s ) TM ( Sl S s )]
VM
1
0
0
( Sl S s )(T TM )
VM
S s 0 Sl 0
, then, GV = - SVT
VM
Since Sl0 > Ss0, thus SV <0, and since T = T - TM < 0, we have GV = - SVT<0
Also by replacing GV into the equation of G*, we have
G* = 163/3(SV)2(T)2
As T TM, T 0, then G*>, barrier for nucleation is infinite at TM.
This implies that supercooling is needed for Homogeneous nucleation. For example, a liquid nickel can be
supercooled by 250K below TM (1453 oC) without solidification, or pure water can be supercooled to as low as
-42 oC without being frozen into ice.
A special case: Homogeneous nucleation in a solid-solid phase transformation
In a solid-solid transformation, a small change in specific volume that occurs must be accommodated elastically,
leading to strain energy effect. Such a strain energy change must be included, together with the volume free
energy and interfacial energy changes (as described for the liquid-to-solid transformation), into the free energy
change of a solid-solid transformation,
G(r) =
4 3
r GV + 4r2 + strain energy
3
G
or
Teq
Assuming VM>VM, when a particle of radius r forms in matrix, both particle and matrix must deform
elastically to accommodate the phase transformation. The formation of such coherent interface raises the free
energy of the system on accounted of the elastic strain fields that arise. Somehow, we can consider such a misfit
as fitting a particle of radius r +r into a cavity of radius r in , as depicted below,
r +r
r +r
r
r=r +r
particle
cavity
With the mutual deformation of the two phases, the net radial strain: E =
r
r'
r
r
The strain energy per volume as defined as CE > 0, where C is the elastic constant of and (a coherent
parameter of both the two phases) for nucleation of in (i.e., transformation ).
2
Then we have the net change of Gibbs free energy as expressed as:
G(r) =
At r*,
4 3
4 3
r C ' E2
r GV + 4r2 +
3
3
dG (r )
=0,
dr r *
r* =
2
2
=
2
(GV + C ' E )
(SV T + C ' E 2 )
( S S )
(T Teq ) + CE2 0; SV (T Teq ) + C ' E 2 0
V
T Teq
C ' E2
C ' E2
; T Teq +
SV
SV
(note: SV <0)
Or
C' E2
= Teq SV
>
Teq
E=0
Ttr
E0
E0
Ttr
>
Teq
E=0
GV = -
( S S )
V
S S
>0
V
Similarly as discussed above for > transformation, for > transformation to occur, the system must be
superheated, i.e., T >> Teq, so that
-SVT + CE2 0 ;
or
coherent parameter of both the two phases) for nucleation of in (i.e., transformation ).
cases, C C
T Teq
C '' E 2
C '' E 2
; T Teq +
SV
SV
For many
(note: SV >0)
C" E 2
,
SV
Ttr = Teq +
C" E 2
> Teq
SV
E2
(C + C)
SV
(heat flow)
Th
Ttr
Teq
Ttr
4 3
4 3
4 3
r C ' E2 =
r GV + 4r2 +
r (GV + GS ) +4r2 .
3
3
3
2. The interfacial contribution (4r2 ) to the nucleation barrier dominates at small nucleus sizes, and
volumetric contributions (
4 3
r (GV + GS ) ) dominate at large nucleus sizes. The competition
3
between these two contributions can produce a complicated sequence of states for a developing
phase, i.e., at small r the system may select a state that minimizes surface energy at the expense
of elastic contribution, while at large r, the interfacial structure can change with concomitant
increases in interfacial energy whenever such a change leads to overall decrease in the free energy
(G(r)) through a decrease of the volumetric contribution. The sequence of states may include
changes in interfacial structure that relax elastic energy or even phase changes in the nuclei if less
stable phases have similar interfacial energies.
3. Typically for solid state nucleation, elastic energy contribution dominates at small particles sizes
and the interfacial energy can be reduced significantly by adopting a coherent structure. As the
particle grows, elastic energy can be reduced by the introduction of misfit dislocations into the
interface. Such interfacial dislocations transform a coherent interface into a semi-coherent
interface at the expense of increased interfacial energy.
4. In supersaturated crystalline solutions (matrix), the particles of the new phase initially formed are
generally coherent with the matrix, due to their lowest interfacial energy compared to the
semi-coherent or incoherent interfaces. Coherent inclusions have an associated elastic strain
energy that resists nucleation. This elastic strain energy is not easy to express with simple
algebraic expressions, except for ideal spherical particles (as we treated above in this lecture).
--- ref. Prof. Craig Carter and his book, Kinetics of Materials, 1st Ed., Wiley-Interscience, 2005.