Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Prepared by:
August 2009
Overland Traffic Consultants, Inc.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This report documents the results of a study evaluating potential traffic impacts created
by building 45 single family homes in the West San Fernando Valley on land which is
currently vacant. These homes will be a new construction on an area located northwest
of Andora Avenue and Plummer Street. The project site is shown on the following aerial
photograph.
It is estimated that the project would generate 431 daily vehicle trips with 34 morning
and 46 evening trips peak hour trips. Vehicular access to the site will be provided from
new project roadways off of Andora Avenue south of Lassen Street and north of
Plummer Street.
The focus of this traffic study is to evaluate the potential traffic impact created by the
new homes at nearby intersections selected for review under consultation with City of
Los Angeles Department of Transportation (LADOT). The study intersections were
determined based on the traffic assignment and the estimated volume of project-
generated traffic that would have the potential to create significant traffic impacts.
Using criteria established by the City of Los Angeles, it has been determined that the
change in traffic conditions associated with the project will not significantly impact the
traffic flow at any of the study intersections.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Chapter 1 - Introduction................................................................................................ 1
LIST OF FIGURES
LIST OF TABLES
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION
As part of the process for the approval of the proposed residential project, the potential
traffic impact of the proposed development has been evaluated using the Critical
Movement Analysis (CMA) method. The CMA analysis method quantifies the operating
conditions of an intersection using a ratio of peak hour traffic volume to intersection
capacity. The amount of new traffic added to an intersection by the proposed project
determines the significance of the project traffic impact. Three key intersections have been
selected under consultation with the City of Los Angeles Department of Transportation
(LADOT) for this traffic impact analysis.
The analysis of traffic flow has been conducted for present conditions and for future conditions
with added traffic growth. Existing traffic counts were conducted in May 2008. These counts
were increased by 2% to reflect any growth to existing year 2009. The future analysis
documents traffic conditions with the proposed project and other potential land development
projects in the study area. Pursuant to the City of Los Angeles traffic impact guidelines, the
following steps have been taken to develop the future traffic volume estimate:
(a) Existing (2009) traffic plus ambient growth to 2012 study year (added 2 percent per
year);
(b) Traffic in (a) plus other development “related” projects (without project scenario);
(c) Traffic in (b) with the proposed project traffic (with project scenario);
The project being proposed is the construction of 45 new single family homes. The project
is located northwest of Andora Avenue and Plummer Street on land which is currently
vacant as shown in Figure 1.
Access to the project area will be from internal roadways created by the project with
connection to Andora Avenue. There will be no roadway connection to the terminus of
Plummer Street as the land required to provide the connection is privately held. The single
family homes will provide a minimum of two parking spaces per home as required by City
of Los Angeles code. Figure 2 illustrates the proposed overall site plan.
Land Use
The project is located in the Chatsworth – Porter Ranch Community plan area which is
located approximately 22 miles northwest of downtown Los Angeles. The land uses
surrounding the project site are residential and open land uses. The project should adhere
to the standards implemented in the Valley Circle Boulevard/Plummer Street Scenic
corridor. Community land use maps for the study area are provided in Appendix A.
The streets within the study area are under the jurisdiction of the City of Los Angeles. A
map illustrating the community plan highway designations and Los Angeles street
standards are included in Appendix B of this report. The nearest regional facility serving
the site is the Ronald Reagan Freeway (State Highway 118) which is under the jurisdiction
of the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans).
In addition to collecting traffic volume data, field surveys were conducted to determine the
roadway and intersection geometry and traffic signal operations. All of the intersections
studied are controlled by stop signs. Figure 3 illustrates the study locations, type of
intersection traffic control and lane configurations. A brief description of the key roadway
facilities is provided below with aerial photos of all the study intersections provided in
Appendix B.
Transportation Network
The Ronald Reagan Freeway (State Highway 118) is located approximately 2 miles north
of the project site. This east - west freeway provides four mixed-flow lanes and one high-
occupancy lane (HOV) in each direction. Full access to the freeway is provided from De
Soto Avenue. Average daily traffic volume on the 118 Freeway east of De Soto Avenue is
approximately 158,000 vehicles per day (ADT). Current non-directional peak hour traffic
volume on the 118 Freeway is approximately 14,800 VPH per Caltrans at the same
location. Freeway capacities are typically 2,000 vehicles per hour (VPH) per lane under
free flow conditions and 1,600 VPH in car pool lanes. Using this capacity value, the 118
Freeway provides a theoretical free flow capacity of approximately 19,200 VPH.
Devonshire Street is an east-west Class II Major Highway providing two lanes in the each
direction. Devonshire provides one lane in each direction at the intersection of Valley
Circle Boulevard. It has a channelized center divider and bike lanes east of Topanga
Canyon Boulevard which is east of the project area. Left turn channelization is provided
for most cross streets. The standard width for a Class II Major Highway is 104 feet of right-
of-way consisting of an 80 foot wide street with 12 foot sidewalks on each side. The full
street width is not provided in the immediate vicinity of the project.
Lassen Street is an east-west Collector street providing one lane in each direction in the
project vicinity. Lassen Street terminates at the intersection of Lassen Street/Andora
Avenue/Valley Circle Boulevard with a four way stop. The roadway becomes a Secondary
Highway east of Topanga Canyon Boulevard.
Plummer Street is an east-west Secondary Highway east of Valley Circle Boulevard and a
local street west of Valley Circle Boulevard. The roadway provides one lane in each
direction in the project vicinity.
Andora Avenue is a north-south roadway that changes to Valley Circle Boulevard which is
a Collector street north of Lassen Street to Andora Avenue which is a local street south of
Lassen Street. Andora Avenue provides one lane for the north and south direction and it
will provide access to the project roadways. Currently Andora Avenue traffic is controlled
by stop signs at Lassen Street.
Baden Avenue is a north-south Collector Street in the project vicinity. Baden Avenue
provides one lane each for the north and south direction. The roadway spans from Lassen
Street to Plummer Street in the project vicinity.
Transit Information
This chapter describes the procedures for estimating the potential traffic volume generated
by the project and its directional orientation.
Traffic Generation
Traffic-generating characteristics of single family homes have been studied by the Institute
of Transportation Engineers (ITE). The results of the traffic generation studies have been
published in Trip Generation, 7th and 8th Edition handbook. This publication of traffic
generation data has become the industry standard for estimating traffic generation for
different land uses. This impact study utilizes the ITE trip generation rates for estimating
the traffic generated by the proposed development on the project site. The 8th Edition of
the handbook was published after the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) for the traffic
study was completed with LADOT. A comparison of the 7th and 8th Edition of the
handbook indicates no differences between the two publications for the single family
home trip generation rates.
For the traffic impact analysis, no reductions due to transit, ride sharing, or existing uses
have been incorporated. It has been estimated that the traffic added to the adjacent
streets is 431 daily trips with 34 morning and 46 afternoon trips as displayed in Table 1.
Table 1
Trip Rates & Generation
ITE AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Code Size Daily Total In Out Total In Out
ITE RATES
Trip Rates - Single
Family Homes 210 per unit 9.57 0.75 0.19 0.56 1.01 0.64 0.37
Traffic Generation
Generation -Single
Family Homes 210 45 units 431 34 9 25 46 29 17
The primary factor affecting the distribution of the project traffic is the location of the
population and employment centers which would generate trip origins and
destinations. The estimated project directional trip distribution is also based on the
study area roadway network. Figure 4 illustrates the estimated area wide project
traffic distribution percentages. Figure 5 shows the project traffic distribution
percentages at each of the study intersections.
Traffic to and from the project site has been assigned to the most direct and reasonable
routes considering the adjacent on-street parking and surrounding street system. Using
the traffic assignment and the estimated peak hour traffic volume as provided in Table 1,
peak hour traffic volumes at each study location have been calculated and are shown in
Figure 6 for the morning and afternoon peak hours. This estimated assignment of the
project traffic flow provides the information necessary to analyze the potential traffic
impacts generated by the project at the study locations.
The traffic conditions analysis was conducted using the Critical Movement Analysis
(CMA) method. All signalized study intersections were evaluated using this
methodology pursuant to the criteria established by LADOT. The peak hour traffic
counts were used along with current intersection geometrics and traffic controls to
determine the intersection’s operating condition. The CMA procedure uses a ratio of
the traffic volume to the intersection capacity to define the proportion of an hour
necessary to accommodate all the traffic moving through the intersection.
The CMA procedure adds the highest combination of conflicting traffic volume (V) at an
intersection and divides the sum by the intersection capacity (C) for a V/C ratio.
Intersection capacity represents the maximum volume of vehicles which has a
reasonable expectation of passing through an intersection in one hour under typical
traffic flow conditions. V/C ratios provide an ideal means for quantifying intersection
operating characteristics for planning purposes. For example, if an intersection has a
V/C value of 0.70, the intersection is operating at 70% capacity with 30% unused
capacity.
Once the volume-to-capacity ratio has been calculated, operating characteristics are
assigned a level of service grade (A through F) to estimate the level of congestion and
stability of the traffic flow. The term "Level of Service" (LOS) definitions used by traffic
engineers are provided in Table 2. Existing peak hour traffic volume at each study
intersection is illustrated in Figure 7 for the morning rush hour and Figure 8 for the
evening rush hour.
Table 2
Level of Service Definitions
LOS V/C Ratio Operating Conditions
A 0.000 – 0.600 At LOS A, there are no cycles that are fully loaded, and
few are even close to loaded and no vehicle waits longer
than one red indication. Typically, the approach appears
quite open, turning movements are easily made, and
nearly all drivers find freedom of operation.
B >0.600 – 0.700 LOS B represents stable operation. An occasional
approach phase is fully utilized and a substantial number
are approaching full use. Many drivers begin to feel
somewhat restricted with platoons of vehicles.
C >0.700 – 0.800 In LOS C stable operation continues. Full signal cycle
loading is still intermittent, but more frequent.
Occasionally drivers may have to wait through more than
one red signal, and back-ups may develop behind turning
vehicles.
D >0.800 – 0.900 LOS D encompasses a zone of increasing restriction,
approaching instability. Delays to approaching vehicles
may be substantial during short peaks within the peak
period, but enough cycles with lower demand occur to
permit periodic clearance of developing queues, thus
preventing excessive back-ups.
E >0.900 – 1.000 LOS E represents the most vehicles that any particular
intersection approach can accommodate. At capacity (V/C
= 1.00) there may be long queues of vehicles waiting
upstream of the intersection and delays may be great (up to
several signal cycles).
F >1.00 LOS F represents jammed conditions. Back-ups from
location downstream or on the cross street may restrict
or prevent movement of vehicles out of the approach
under consideration; hence, volumes carried are not
predictable. V/C values are highly variable, because full
utilization of the approach may be prevented by outside
conditions.
By applying these procedures to the intersection data, the CMA values and the
corresponding Levels of Service (LOS) for existing traffic conditions were determined for
each intersection. The LOS values are summarized in Table 3. Supporting capacity
Table 3
Level of Service for Existing Conditions
Peak Existing (2009)
No. Intersection Hour V/C LOS
1 Valley Circle Bl & AM 0.350 A
Devonshire Street PM 0.224 A
2 Valley Circle Bl-Baden & AM 0.150 A
Lassen Street-Andora PM 0.159 A
3 Baden Avenue & AM 0.586 A
Plummer Street PM 0.570 A
Future traffic volume projections have been developed to analyze the traffic conditions
after completion of other planned land developments including the proposed project.
Pursuant to the City of Los Angeles traffic impact guidelines, the following steps have
been taken to develop the future traffic volume estimate:
(a) Existing traffic plus ambient growth (2.0 percent per year) to 2012 study year;
(b) Traffic in (a) plus related projects (without project scenario);
(c) Traffic in (b) with the proposed project traffic (with project scenario);
(d) Traffic in (c) plus the proposed traffic mitigation, if necessary.
The future cumulative analysis includes other development projects located within the
study area that are either under construction or planned. As part of this analysis,
development information was obtained from the City of Los Angles Department of
Transportation, City of Los Angeles Planning Department, and other studies in the area.
Other development projects that could produce additional traffic at the study
intersections by the future year 2012 were added to the future analysis. It should be
noted that this project, or any actions taken by the City regarding this project, does not
have a direct bearing on these other proposed related projects. The locations of twelve
(12) related projects are shown in Figure 9, with their descriptions provided in Table 4
and estimated traffic in Table 5.
The potential traffic impact of traffic increases has been calculated by adding the
existing traffic volume, the ambient growth factor and traffic from other development
projects. Future cumulative “without project” peak hour traffic volume estimates are
shown in Figures 10 and 11 for the morning and evening, respectively.
Table 4
Related Projects Descriptions
No Location Description
1 24000 Roscoe Bl 156 du Single Family Homes
Table 5
Related Projects Net Trip Generation
The traffic impacts created by the ambient traffic growth plus other development
projects are shown below in Table 6.
Table 6
Future Traffic Conditions
Without Project
Comparing the changes in the traffic conditions between the different development
scenarios provides the necessary information to determine if the traffic increases create
a significant impact on the study intersections. According to the standards adopted by
LADOT, a traffic impact is considered significant if the related increase in the CMA
value equals or exceeds the thresholds shown in the table below.
The traffic impact of project’s traffic volume has been calculated by adding the project
volume to the non-project traffic growth. Table 7 contains the project impact values at
the study intersections. As shown, none of the study intersections are impacted by
project traffic using the significant impact criteria established by the City of Los Angeles
Department of Transportation. It should be noted that the impact analysis does not
consider any changes to the existing intersection configuration (i.e., future roadway
improvements). Future cumulative “with project” peak hour traffic volumes are shown in
Figures 12 and 13 for the morning and afternoon, respectively.
Table 7
Future Traffic Conditions
With Project
The Congestion Management program (CMP) was adopted to track regional traffic
growth, building permits and transportation improvements. The CMP designated a
transportation network including all state highways and some arterials within the County
to be monitored by local jurisdictions. If the LOS standard deteriorates on the CMP
network, then local jurisdictions must prepare a deficiency plan to be in conformance with
the CMP program. Current changes to the CMP program being considered by local
officials include adding a countywide trip fee to mitigate regional cumulative impacts.
For purposes of the CMP, LOS analysis is required when the project will add 50 or more
trips during either the am or pm weekday peak hour. A substantial change in freeway
conditions is defined as an increase or decrease of 0.10 in the demand to capacity ratio
and a change in LOS. A CMP traffic impact analysis is required if a project will add 150
or more trips to a freeway segment in either direction during either the AM or PM
weekday peak hour. The closest CMP intersection to this project is Devonshire Street
and Topanga Canyon Boulevard. As shown in Figure 6, the estimated traffic volume
generated by the project does not exceed the CMP traffic limits. Therefore, no additional
CMP analysis is necessary.
Using criteria established by the City of Los Angeles, it has been determined that the
change in traffic conditions associated with the project traffic will not significantly impact
the traffic flow at any of the study intersections.
N
SCALE 1 : 696
50 0 50 100 150
FEET
Plummer St & Baden Avenue
N
SCALE 1 : 696
50 0 50 100 150
FEET
Valley Circle Bl/Baden Ave & Lassen St/Andora Ave
N
SCALE 1 : 696
50 0 50 100 150
FEET
APPENDIX C
TRANSIT ROUTES
MJA SYSTEM MAP
G:H:
9:HD
B6HD
9:KDCH=>G: AV787
CE419 158 158 158
CE419 CE419 CE419
CHATSWORTH 240 741 239
A6HH:C
I6BE6
168
166 243 239 2
167 EAJBB:G Cal State CE
364
O:AO6=
University
76A7D6
8DG7>C
CDG9=D;; 166
364 NORTHRIDGE
IDE6C<68NC
245 244 LDNOR NORTHRIDGE 239 236 237
CE575 AV787 243 CE573
9:HDID
SC791 SC796 E6GI=:C>6 CE574
LDNOR 152
G:H:96
A>C9A:N
5
an
rn
1 Bl
n
Mo
Sa
nt
ag C yn
ue el
2
St
La
ur
118 Av 4 Chatsworth Metrolink Station
2
ta
153 353
29
rle
Roscoe Bl
PACOIMA Os
Br A
an
fo
Metro Bus Lines 158, 166, 167, 168,
0 bo rd
23
8
rn
eS
t
St
244, 245, 364, CE419, SV-C, SC791,
4
Te 5 Woodman Av
39
rr 1
aB Metrolink, Amtrak
152
4
22
el
Va
n
la
St
7 PANORAMA
Nu 16
ys
Bl
CITY LEGEND
Vesper Av Van Nuys Bl
NORTH 233 761 Timepoints used on Timetable
HILLS Sepulveda Bl
234 734 Limited Stops
405
Haskell Av
SC798 SC793
Limited stop and timepoint
Metrolink Stations
Plummer St
Devonshire St
Woodley Av
Lassen St
237
Tampa Av
242
167
NORTHRIDGE 3
Corbin Av
243
158 243 CE419
Winnetka Av
243
Mason Av
168
De Soto Av
244
353
Canoga Av
Old Depot 4 Canoga Av
Plaza Rd Owensmouth Av
Topanga Cyn Bl
245
Nordhoff St
Parthenia St
Lassen St
Plummer St
152 153
SV-C
CHATSWORTH
150974
ROUTE MAP
Topanga Cyn Bl
Devonshire St 158
Canoga Av
3
Lurline Av
243
Lassen St 1 168
Marilla St
Plummer St
167
Nordhoff St
166 364
SC796
Parthenia St
CANOGA PARK
Roscoe Bl
152 153 353
243
169
Saticoy St
Shoup Av
Topanga Cyn Bl
Owensmouth Av
Canoga Av
DeSoto Av
Mason Av
Winnetka Av
152 153 353
WEST HILLS
Sherman Wy
163 363
Vanowen St
165
2
150
164 SC791
Victory Bl
Fallbrook Av
Erwin St
4
Oxnard St 6
CE575
SC796
750
Burbank Bl
5
101 CE423
161
Ventura Bl 750 150
Topanga Cyn Bl
22
CE4
is 7
Sa n Lu WOODLAND HILLS
161 Ave
645
151009
APPENDIX D
TRAFFIC COUNTS
Intersection Turning Movement
Prepared by:
TOTAL
39
85
7
30
PM
8
NOON
0
31
55
AM
Devonshire St Devonshire St
6
1 5 3 0 2 21 0 34 55 1
0 222 129 0 93 67 0 122 189 1
1 45 26 0 19 71 0 63 134 0
16
16
98
PM
001
NOON
(Intersection Name)
TOTAL
253
20
25
0 1 1 Thursday 5/29/08
Day Date
NORTHBOUND APPROACH LANES
COUNT PERIODS
am 7:00 AM - 9:00 AM
noon -
pm 4:00 PM - 6:00 PM
N-S STREET: Valley Circle Blvd DATE: 5/29/2008 LOCATION: City of Chatsworth
NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL
LANES: 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1
6:00 AM
6:15 AM
6:30 AM
6:45 AM
7:00 AM 0 0 15 7 3 1 0 25 0 4 8 1 64
7:15 AM 0 2 21 6 6 0 0 30 9 11 10 9 104
7:30 AM 1 3 31 7 11 1 1 30 4 7 14 10 120
7:45 AM 0 1 42 19 7 2 1 37 8 16 17 3 153
8:00 AM 0 2 51 14 8 1 1 37 7 30 29 2 182
8:15 AM 3 3 31 15 5 2 0 25 7 18 7 6 122
8:30 AM 1 3 18 6 5 0 0 25 3 16 13 4 94
8:45 AM 0 1 16 4 2 1 0 18 6 11 14 3 76
9:00 AM
9:15 AM
9:30 AM
9:45 AM
10:00 AM
10:15 AM
10:30 AM
10:45 AM
11:00 AM
11:15 AM
11:30 AM
11:45 AM
TOTAL NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL
VOLUMES = 5 15 225 78 47 8 3 227 44 113 112 38 915
nb a nb d sb a sb d eb a eb d wb a nb d
245 56 133 204 274 530 263 125
AM Peak Hr Begins at: 730 AM
PEAK
VOLUMES = 4 9 155 55 31 6 3 129 26 71 67 21 577
PEAK HR.
FACTOR: 0.792 0.821 0.859 0.652 0.793
N-S STREET: Valley Circle Blvd DATE: 5/29/2008 LOCATION: City of Chatsworth
NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL
LANES: 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1
1:00 PM
1:15 PM
1:30 PM
1:45 PM
2:00 PM
2:15 PM
2:30 PM
2:45 PM
3:00 PM
3:15 PM
3:30 PM
3:45 PM
4:00 PM 4 2 25 9 5 1 0 16 2 9 24 10 107
4:15 PM 3 3 19 4 2 0 2 21 4 18 22 3 101
4:30 PM 2 4 40 7 1 0 0 24 5 7 32 9 131
4:45 PM 4 5 17 6 1 0 0 15 6 21 28 12 115
5:00 PM 6 4 26 6 3 0 1 31 7 12 30 2 128
5:15 PM 4 3 15 11 3 1 1 23 1 23 32 11 128
5:30 PM 2 4 21 4 4 0 1 25 3 9 32 4 109
5:45 PM 2 5 14 8 2 2 2 19 1 13 35 8 111
6:00 PM
6:15 PM
6:30 PM
6:45 PM
TOTAL NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL
VOLUMES = 27 30 177 55 21 4 7 174 29 112 235 59 930
nb a nb d sb a sb d eb a eb d wb a nb d
234 96 80 162 210 406 406 266
PM Peak Hr Begins at: 430 PM
PEAK
VOLUMES = 16 16 98 30 8 1 2 93 19 63 122 34 502
PEAK HR.
FACTOR: 0.707 0.650 0.731 0.830 0.958
Blvd/Baden Ave
Valley Circle
0 1 0 N
TOTAL
24
92
28
13
33
PM
6
NOON
0
11
59
22
AM
0 27 7 0 20 30 0 28 58 0
1 48 19 0 29 20 0 31 51 1
0 10 6 0 4 13 0 16 29 0
54
21
PM
001
NOON
15
AM
St/Andora Ave
Blvd/Baden Ave
(Intersection Name)
Valley Circle
TOTAL
96
36
9
0 1 0 Thursday 5/29/08
Day Date
NORTHBOUND APPROACH LANES
COUNT PERIODS
am 7:00 AM - 9:00 AM
noon -
pm 4:00 PM - 6:00 PM
N-S STREET: Valley Circle Blvd/Baden Ave DATE: 5/29/2008 LOCATION: City of Chatsworth
NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL
LANES: 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0
6:00 AM
6:15 AM
6:30 AM
6:45 AM
7:00 AM 0 4 2 2 5 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 17
7:15 AM 1 4 3 6 8 2 4 5 1 4 2 0 40
7:30 AM 0 13 7 7 13 0 4 4 2 2 3 5 60
7:45 AM 2 8 3 5 15 2 2 8 2 5 5 10 67
8:00 AM 1 8 3 6 19 6 1 5 1 3 6 9 68
8:15 AM 2 13 2 4 12 3 0 2 1 3 6 6 54
8:30 AM 0 10 2 6 15 2 2 3 3 4 1 4 52
8:45 AM 2 8 2 6 8 3 3 2 2 1 4 0 41
9:00 AM
9:15 AM
9:30 AM
9:45 AM
10:00 AM
10:15 AM
10:30 AM
10:45 AM
11:00 AM
11:15 AM
11:30 AM
11:45 AM
TOTAL NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL
VOLUMES = 8 68 24 42 95 18 17 30 13 23 27 34 399
nb a nb d sb a sb d eb a eb d wb a nb d
100 119 155 131 60 96 84 53
AM Peak Hr Begins at: 730 AM
PEAK
VOLUMES = 5 42 15 22 59 11 7 19 6 13 20 30 249
PEAK HR.
FACTOR: 0.775 0.742 0.667 0.788 0.915
N-S STREET: Valley Circle Blvd/Baden Ave DATE: 5/29/2008 LOCATION: City of Chatsworth
NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL
LANES: 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0
1:00 PM
1:15 PM
1:30 PM
1:45 PM
2:00 PM
2:15 PM
2:30 PM
2:45 PM
3:00 PM
3:15 PM
3:30 PM
3:45 PM
4:00 PM 1 18 8 0 12 3 2 4 2 4 5 11 70
4:15 PM 0 13 5 1 7 2 2 5 0 6 9 6 56
4:30 PM 2 16 3 4 6 7 7 6 0 3 10 3 67
4:45 PM 1 7 5 1 8 1 9 14 2 3 7 8 66
5:00 PM 1 11 4 4 7 3 3 4 0 2 2 7 48
5:15 PM 1 10 3 3 12 3 3 5 2 7 2 7 58
5:30 PM 0 13 3 3 8 2 1 2 0 3 3 11 49
5:45 PM 4 6 1 5 8 0 2 1 0 4 4 7 42
6:00 PM
6:15 PM
6:30 PM
6:45 PM
TOTAL NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL
VOLUMES = 10 94 32 21 68 21 29 41 6 32 42 60 456
nb a nb d sb a sb d eb a eb d wb a nb d
136 183 110 106 76 94 134 73
PM Peak Hr Begins at: 400 PM
PEAK
VOLUMES = 4 54 21 6 33 13 20 29 4 16 31 28 259
PEAK HR.
FACTOR: 0.731 0.765 0.530 0.893 0.925
Baden Ave 0 1 0 N
TOTAL
68
60
0
32
26
PM
0
NOON
0
36
34
AM
Plummer St Plummer St
0
0 59 23 0 36 22 0 31 53 0
1 635 366 0 269 208 0 277 485 1
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PM
001
NOON
(Intersection Name)
TOTAL
Baden Ave
0 0 0 Thursday 5/29/08
Day Date
NORTHBOUND APPROACH LANES
COUNT PERIODS
am 7:00 AM - 9:00 AM
noon -
pm 4:00 PM - 6:00 PM
NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL
LANES: 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0
6:00 AM
6:15 AM
6:30 AM
6:45 AM
7:00 AM 2 3 1 71 31 2 110
7:15 AM 4 5 3 84 40 2 138
7:30 AM 9 10 10 99 58 5 191
7:45 AM 8 9 3 99 44 4 167
8:00 AM 11 7 1 105 60 5 189
8:15 AM 6 10 9 63 46 8 142
8:30 AM 10 5 8 50 45 4 122
8:45 AM 8 6 7 51 39 6 117
9:00 AM
9:15 AM
9:30 AM
9:45 AM
10:00 AM
10:15 AM
10:30 AM
10:45 AM
11:00 AM
11:15 AM
11:30 AM
11:45 AM
TOTAL NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL
VOLUMES = 0 0 0 58 0 55 42 622 0 0 363 36 1176
nb a nb d sb a sb d eb a eb d wb a nb d
0 78 113 0 664 680 399 418
AM Peak Hr Begins at: 730 AM
PEAK
VOLUMES = 0 0 0 34 0 36 23 366 0 0 208 22 689
PEAK HR.
FACTOR: 0.000 0.921 0.892 0.885 0.902
NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL
LANES: 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0
1:00 PM
1:15 PM
1:30 PM
1:45 PM
2:00 PM
2:15 PM
2:30 PM
2:45 PM
3:00 PM
3:15 PM
3:30 PM
3:45 PM
4:00 PM 2 9 16 62 52 4 145
4:15 PM 5 11 10 73 67 7 173
4:30 PM 8 4 15 70 50 6 153
4:45 PM 5 7 7 69 75 5 168
5:00 PM 7 5 4 54 82 12 164
5:15 PM 6 16 10 76 70 8 186
5:30 PM 2 4 7 64 67 8 152
5:45 PM 3 7 6 47 43 12 118
6:00 PM
6:15 PM
6:30 PM
6:45 PM
TOTAL NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL
VOLUMES = 0 0 0 38 0 63 75 515 0 0 506 62 1259
nb a nb d sb a sb d eb a eb d wb a nb d
0 137 101 0 590 553 568 569
PM Peak Hr Begins at: 430 PM
PEAK
VOLUMES = 0 0 0 26 0 32 36 269 0 0 277 31 671
PEAK HR.
FACTOR: 0.000 0.659 0.887 0.819 0.902
Devonshire Street 0%
Valley Circle Bl
0% 1 25%
0%
0%
0% (25%) (25%)
50% 0% 0%
0%
(50%) 2 0%
(25%)
(25%)
25% 0% 0%
(5%) 0% (20%)
20%
Plummer Street 0%
Baden Avenue
5% 3 0%
0%
0%
0% 0% 0%
CMACalc - Critical Movement Analysis Calculator
Bureau of Planning and Land Use Development
ANDORA-PLUMMER RESIDENTIAL
Intersection No. 1 2009, EXISTING 2012, PROJECTED CUMULATIVE BASE 2012, WITH PROJECT 2012, WITH TRAFFIC MITIGATION
FALSE
North/South Street: Critical Phases: 0 Ambient Growth Critical Phases: 0 Adjacent In Out Total Critical Phases: 0
Valley Circle Bl Capacity: 1200 from: 2009 Capacity: 1200 Trip AM 9 25 34 Capacity: 1200
East/West Street: Signal System: 1 to: 2012 Signal System: 1 Gen 1 PM 29 17 46 Use Dist 2?
FALSE Signal System: 1
Devonshire Street v/c reduction: 0% at: 2.0% v/c reduction: 0% Trip AM 0 0 0 v/c reduction: 0%
Analysis Date: 08/07/2009 Opposed Phasing: 0 Opposed Phasing: 0 Gen 2 PM 0 0 0 Opposed Phasing: 0
Counts Lane + Amb. + Area = Total Lane + Project = Total Lane Adjusted Total Lane
AM Peak: 7:30 AM Volume Lanes Volume Growth Projects Volume Lanes Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume
Left 0 4 0 4 0% 0 4 0 4
4 0 0 4 0 4 0 4
Lt-Th N/B RTOR: 1 13 1 48 0% 1 54 1 54
Thru Existing: 50% 0 0 0 0 (25%) 0 0 0 0
9 1 34 44 6 50 0 50
Th-Rt Projected: 50% 0 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0
Right Mitigated: 50% 1 122 1 135 (25%) 1 140 1 140
Northbound
158 10 35 203 6 209 0 209
Shared 0 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0
Left 0 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0
56 3 15 75 0 75 0 75
Lt-Th S/B RTOR: 0 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0
Thru Existing: 50% 0 0 0 0 25% 0 0 0 0
32 2 86 120 2 122 0 122
Th-Rt Projected: 50% 0 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0
Right Mitigated: 50% 0 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0
Southbound
6 0 0 6 0 6 0 6
Shared 1 94 1 201 0% 1 203 1 203
Left 1 3 1 3 0% 1 3 1 3
3 0 0 3 0 3 0 3
Lt-Th E/B RTOR: 0 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0
Thru Existing: 50% 1 132 1 140 0% 1 140 1 140
132 8 0 140 0 140 0 140
Th-Rt Projected: 50% 0 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0
Right Mitigated: 50% 1 25 1 26 0% 1 26 1 26
Eastbound
27 2 0 28 0 28 0 28
Shared 0 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0
Left 1 72 1 137 25% 1 139 1 139
72 4 60 137 2 139 0 139
Lt-Th W/B RTOR: 0 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0
Thru Existing: 50% 0 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0
68 4 0 73 0 73 0 73
Th-Rt Projected: 50% 1 90 1 107 0% 1 107 1 107
Right Mitigated: 50% 0 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0
Westbound
21 1 12 35 0 35 0 35
Shared 0 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0
Critical Volumes: North-South: 216 North-South: 335 North-South: 342 North-South: 342
East-West: 204 East-West: 277 East-West: 279 East-West: 279
Total: 420 Total: 612 Total: 621 Total: 621
Volume/capacity (v/c ) ratio: 0.350 0.510 0.517 0.517
v/c less ATSAC adjustment: 0.350 0.510 0.517 0.517
Level of Service (LOS): A A A A
PROJECT IMPACT
Filename: \\Otcnas\Otcnas\Share\Project 2008\Andora-Plummer\CMACalc 3.9.xls Change in v/c due to project: 0.007 Δv/c after mitigation: 0.007
Developed 2005-2007 by Ken Aitchison Significantly impacted? NO Fully mitigated? N/A
CMACalc - Critical Movement Analysis Calculator
Bureau of Planning and Land Use Development
ANDORA-PLUMMER RESIDENTIAL
Intersection No. 1 2009, EXISTING 2012, PROJECTED CUMULATIVE BASE 2012, WITH PROJECT 2012, WITH TRAFFIC MITIGATION
FALSE
North/South Street: Critical Phases: 0 Ambient Growth Critical Phases: 0 Adjacent In Out Total Critical Phases: 0
Valley Circle Bl Capacity: 1200 from: 2009 Capacity: 1200 Trip AM 9 25 34 Capacity: 1200
East/West Street: Signal System: 1 to: 2012 Signal System: 1 Gen 1 PM 29 17 46 Use Dist 2?
FALSE Signal System: 1
Devonshire Street v/c reduction: 0% at: 2.0% v/c reduction: 0% Trip AM 0 0 0 v/c reduction: 0%
Analysis Date: 08/07/2009 Opposed Phasing: 0 Opposed Phasing: 0 Gen 2 PM 0 0 0 Opposed Phasing: 0
Counts Lane + Amb. + Area = Total Lane + Project Total Lane Adjusted Total Lane
PM Peak: 4:30 PM Volume Lanes Volume Growth Projects Volume Lanes Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume
Left 0 16 0 17 0% 0 17 0 17
16 1 0 17 0 17 0 17
Lt-Th N/B RTOR: 1 33 1 127 0% 1 131 1 131
Thru Existing: 50% 0 0 0 0 (25%) 0 0 0 0
16 1 92 109 4 113 0 113
Th-Rt Projected: 50% 0 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0
Right Mitigated: 50% 1 68 1 129 (25%) 1 130 1 130
Northbound
100 6 76 182 4 186 0 186
Shared 0 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0
Left 0 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0
31 2 32 64 0 64 0 64
Lt-Th S/B RTOR: 0 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0
Thru Existing: 50% 0 0 0 0 25% 0 0 0 0
8 0 30 39 7 46 0 46
Th-Rt Projected: 50% 0 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0
Right Mitigated: 50% 0 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0
Southbound
1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1
Shared 1 40 1 104 0% 1 111 1 111
Left 1 2 1 2 0% 1 2 1 2
2 0 0 2 0 2 0 2
Lt-Th E/B RTOR: 0 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0
Thru Existing: 50% 1 95 1 101 0% 1 101 1 101
95 6 0 101 0 101 0 101
Th-Rt Projected: 50% 0 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0
Right Mitigated: 50% 1 11 1 12 0% 1 12 1 12
Eastbound
19 1 0 21 0 21 0 21
Shared 0 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0
Left 1 64 1 105 25% 1 112 1 112
64 4 37 105 7 112 0 112
Lt-Th W/B RTOR: 0 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0
Thru Existing: 50% 0 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0
124 8 0 132 0 132 0 132
Th-Rt Projected: 50% 1 159 1 211 0% 1 211 1 211
Right Mitigated: 50% 0 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0
Westbound
35 2 42 79 0 79 0 79
Shared 0 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0
Critical Volumes: North-South: 108 North-South: 233 North-South: 241 North-South: 241
East-West: 161 East-West: 213 East-West: 213 East-West: 213
Total: 269 Total: 446 Total: 454 Total: 454
Volume/capacity (v/c ) ratio: 0.224 0.372 0.379 0.379
v/c less ATSAC adjustment: 0.224 0.372 0.379 0.379
Level of Service (LOS): A A A A
PROJECT IMPACT
Filename: \\Otcnas\Otcnas\Share\Project 2008\Andora-Plummer\CMACalc 3.9.xls Change in v/c due to project: 0.007 Δv/c after mitigation: 0.007
Developed 2005-2007 by Ken Aitchison Significantly impacted? NO Fully mitigated? N/A
CMACalc - Critical Movement Analysis Calculator
Bureau of Planning and Land Use Development
ANDORA-PLUMMER RESIDENTIAL
Intersection No. 2 2009, EXISTING 2012, PROJECTED CUMULATIVE BASE 2012, WITH PROJECT 2012, WITH TRAFFIC MITIGATION
FALSE
North/South Street: Critical Phases: 0 Ambient Growth Critical Phases: 0 Adjacent In Out Total Critical Phases: 0
Valley Circle Bl-Baden Capacity: 1200 from: 2009 Capacity: 1200 Trip AM 9 25 34 Capacity: 1200
East/West Street: Signal System: 1 to: 2012 Signal System: 1 Gen 1 PM 29 17 46 Use Dist 2?
FALSE Signal System: 1
Lassen Street-Andora v/c reduction: 0% at: 2.0% v/c reduction: 0% Trip AM 0 0 0 v/c reduction: 0%
Analysis Date: 08/07/2009 Opposed Phasing: 0 Opposed Phasing: 0 Gen 2 PM 0 0 0 Opposed Phasing: 0
Counts Lane + Amb. + Area = Total Lane + Project = Total Lane Adjusted Total Lane
AM Peak: 7:30 AM Volume Lanes Volume Growth Projects Volume Lanes Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume
Left 0 5 0 6 25% 0 8 0 8
5 0 1 6 2 8 0 8
Lt-Th N/B RTOR: 0 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0
Thru Existing: 50% 0 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0
43 3 41 86 0 86 0 86
Th-Rt Projected: 50% 0 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0
Right Mitigated: 50% 0 15 0 61 0% 0 61 0 61
15 1 61 61 61
Northbound
Shared 1 63
45 1 154 0%
0 1 156
0 1 156
Left 0 22 0 57 0% 0 57 0 57
22 1 33 57 0 57 0 57
Lt-Th S/B RTOR: 0 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0
Thru Existing: 50% 0 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0
60 4 89 153 0 153 0 153
Th-Rt Projected: 50% 0 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0
Right Mitigated: 50% 0 11 0 14 50% 0 19 0 19
11 1 14 19 19
Southbound
Shared 1 94
2 1 224 0%
5 1 229
0 1 229
Left 0 7 0 8 (50%) 0 21 0 21
7 0 0 8 13 21 0 21
Lt-Th E/B RTOR: 0 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0
Thru Existing: 50% 0 0 0 0 (25%) 0 0 0 0
19 1 0 21 6 27 0 27
Th-Rt Projected: 50% 0 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0
Right Mitigated: 50% 0 6 0 7 (25%) 0 13 0 13
Eastbound
6 0 0 6 6 12 0 12
Shared 1 33 1 35 0% 1 60 1 60
Left 0 13 0 64 0% 0 64 0 64
13 1 50 64 0 64 0 64
Lt-Th W/B RTOR: 0 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0
Thru Existing: 50% 0 0 0 0 25% 0 0 0 0
20 1 4 26 2 28 0 28
Th-Rt Projected: 50% 0 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0
Right Mitigated: 50% 0 31 0 48 0% 0 48 0 48
Westbound
31 2 16 48 0 48 0 48
Shared 1 64 1 138 0% 1 140 1 140
Critical Volumes: North-South: 109 North-South: 285 North-South: 290 North-South: 290
East-West: 71 East-West: 146 East-West: 161 East-West: 161
Total: 181 Total: 431 Total: 451 Total: 451
Volume/capacity (v/c ) ratio: 0.150 0.359 0.376 0.376
v/c less ATSAC adjustment: 0.150 0.359 0.376 0.376
Level of Service (LOS): A A A A
PROJECT IMPACT
Filename: \\Otcnas\Otcnas\Share\Project 2008\Andora-Plummer\CMACalc 3.9.xls Change in v/c due to project: 0.017 Δv/c after mitigation: 0.017
Developed 2005-2007 by Ken Aitchison Significantly impacted? NO Fully mitigated? N/A
CMACalc - Critical Movement Analysis Calculator
Bureau of Planning and Land Use Development
ANDORA-PLUMMER RESIDENTIAL
Intersection No. 2 2009, EXISTING 2012, PROJECTED CUMULATIVE BASE 2012, WITH PROJECT 2012, WITH TRAFFIC MITIGATION
FALSE
North/South Street: Critical Phases: 0 Ambient Growth Critical Phases: 0 Adjacent In Out Total Critical Phases: 0
Valley Circle Bl-Baden Capacity: 1200 from: 2009 Capacity: 1200 Trip AM 9 25 34 Capacity: 1200
East/West Street: Signal System: 1 to: 2012 Signal System: 1 Gen 1 PM 29 17 46 Use Dist 2?
FALSE Signal System: 1
Lassen Street-Andora v/c reduction: 0% at: 2.0% v/c reduction: 0% Trip AM 0 0 0 v/c reduction: 0%
Analysis Date: 08/07/2009 Opposed Phasing: 0 Opposed Phasing: 0 Gen 2 PM 0 0 0 Opposed Phasing: 0
Counts Lane + Amb. + Area = Total Lane + Project Total Lane Adjusted Total Lane
PM Peak: 4:00 PM Volume Lanes Volume Growth Projects Volume Lanes Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume
Left 0 4 0 6 25% 0 13 0 13
4 0 2 6 7 13 0 13
Lt-Th N/B RTOR: 0 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0
Thru Existing: 50% 0 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0
55 3 99 157 0 157 0 157
Th-Rt Projected: 50% 0 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0
Right Mitigated: 50% 0 21 0 99 0% 0 99 0 99
21 1 99 99 99
Northbound
Shared 1 81
76 1 263 0%
0 1 270
0 1 270
Left 0 6 0 22 0% 0 22 0 22
6 0 15 21 0 21 0 21
Lt-Th S/B RTOR: 0 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0
Thru Existing: 50% 0 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0
34 2 45 81 0 81 0 81
Th-Rt Projected: 50% 0 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0
Right Mitigated: 50% 0 13 0 18 50% 0 33 0 33
13 1 18 33 33
Southbound
Shared 1 53
4 1 120 0%
15 1 135
0 1 135
Left 0 20 0 22 (50%) 0 31 0 31
20 1 0 22 9 31 0 31
Lt-Th E/B RTOR: 0 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0
Thru Existing: 50% 0 0 0 0 (25%) 0 0 0 0
30 2 0 31 6 37 0 37
Th-Rt Projected: 50% 0 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0
Right Mitigated: 50% 0 4 0 4 (25%) 0 8 0 8
Eastbound
4 0 0 4 4 8 0 8
Shared 1 54 1 57 0% 1 76 1 76
Left 0 16 0 72 0% 0 72 0 72
16 1 55 72 0 72 0 72
Lt-Th W/B RTOR: 0 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0
Thru Existing: 50% 0 0 0 0 25% 0 0 0 0
32 2 7 41 7 48 0 48
Th-Rt Projected: 50% 0 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0
Right Mitigated: 50% 0 29 0 71 0% 0 71 0 71
Westbound
29 2 41 71 0 71 0 71
Shared 1 77 1 184 0% 1 191 1 191
Critical Volumes: North-South: 94 North-South: 284 North-South: 303 North-South: 303
East-West: 97 East-West: 206 East-West: 222 East-West: 222
Total: 191 Total: 490 Total: 524 Total: 524
Volume/capacity (v/c ) ratio: 0.159 0.408 0.437 0.437
v/c less ATSAC adjustment: 0.159 0.408 0.437 0.437
Level of Service (LOS): A A A A
PROJECT IMPACT
Filename: \\Otcnas\Otcnas\Share\Project 2008\Andora-Plummer\CMACalc 3.9.xls Change in v/c due to project: 0.029 Δv/c after mitigation: 0.029
Developed 2005-2007 by Ken Aitchison Significantly impacted? NO Fully mitigated? N/A
CMACalc - Critical Movement Analysis Calculator
Bureau of Planning and Land Use Development
ANDORA-PLUMMER RESIDENTIAL
Intersection No. 3 2009, EXISTING 2012, PROJECTED CUMULATIVE BASE 2012, WITH PROJECT 2012, WITH TRAFFIC MITIGATION
FALSE
North/South Street: Critical Phases: 0 Ambient Growth Critical Phases: 0 Adjacent In Out Total Critical Phases: 0
Baden Avenue Capacity: 1200 from: 2009 Capacity: 1200 Trip AM 9 25 34 Capacity: 1200
East/West Street: Signal System: 1 to: 2012 Signal System: 1 Gen 1 PM 29 17 46 Use Dist 2?
FALSE Signal System: 1
Plummer Street v/c reduction: 0% at: 2.0% v/c reduction: 0% Trip AM 0 0 0 v/c reduction: 0%
nalysis Date: 08/07/2009 Opposed Phasing: 0 Opposed Phasing: 0 Gen 2 PM 0 0 0 Opposed Phasing: 0
Counts Lane + Amb. + Area = Total Lane + Project = Total Lane Adjusted Total Lane
AM Peak: 7:30 AM Volume Lanes Volume Growth Projects Volume Lanes Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume
Left 0 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lt-Th N/B RTOR: 0 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0
Thru Existing: 50% 0 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Th-Rt Projected: 50% 0 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0
Right Mitigated: 50% 0 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0
Northbound
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Shared 0 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0
Left 0 0 0 0 (20%) 0 0 0 0
35 2 43 80 5 85 0 85
Lt-Th S/B RTOR: 0 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0
Thru Existing: 50% 0 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Th-Rt Projected: 50% 0 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0
Right Mitigated: 50% 0 0 0 0 (5%) 0 0 0 0
Southbound
37 2 92 131 1 132 0 132
Shared 1 71 1 211 0% 1 217 1 217
Left 0 0 0 0 5% 0 0 0 0
23 1 54 79 0 79 0 79
Lt-Th E/B RTOR: 1 397 1 510 0% 1 510 1 510
Thru Existing: 50% 0 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0
373 23 35 431 0 431 0 431
Th-Rt Projected: 50% 0 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0
Right Mitigated: 50% 0 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0
Eastbound
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Shared 0 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0
Left 0 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lt-Th W/B RTOR: 0 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0
Thru Existing: 50% 0 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0
212 13 51 276 0 276 0 276
Th-Rt Projected: 50% 1 235 1 330 0% 1 332 1 332
Right Mitigated: 50% 0 0 0 0 20% 0 0 0 0
Westbound
22 1 30 54 2 56 0 56
Shared 0 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0
Critical Volumes: North-South: 71 North-South: 211 North-South: 217 North-South: 217
East-West: 632 East-West: 840 East-West: 842 East-West: 842
Total: 703 Total: 1051 Total: 1059 Total: 1059
Volume/capacity (v/c ) ratio: 0.586 0.876 0.882 0.882
v/c less ATSAC adjustment: 0.586 0.876 0.882 0.882
Level of Service (LOS): A D D D
PROJECT IMPACT
Filename: \\Otcnas\Otcnas\Share\Project 2008\Andora-Plummer\CMACalc 3.9.xls Change in v/c due to project: 0.006 Δv/c after mitigation: 0.006
Developed 2005-2007 by Ken Aitchison Significantly impacted? NO Fully mitigated? N/A
CMACalc - Critical Movement Analysis Calculator
Bureau of Planning and Land Use Development
ANDORA-PLUMMER RESIDENTIAL
Intersection No. 3 2009, EXISTING 2012, PROJECTED CUMULATIVE BASE 2012, WITH PROJECT 2012, WITH TRAFFIC MITIGATION
FALSE
North/South Street: Critical Phases: 0 Ambient Growth Critical Phases: 0 Adjacent In Out Total Critical Phases: 0
Baden Avenue Capacity: 1200 from: 2009 Capacity: 1200 Trip AM 9 25 34 Capacity: 1200
East/West Street: Signal System: 1 to: 2012 Signal System: 1 Gen 1 PM 29 17 46 Use Dist 2?
FALSE Signal System: 1
Plummer Street v/c reduction: 0% at: 2.0% v/c reduction: 0% Trip AM 0 0 0 v/c reduction: 0%
nalysis Date: 08/07/2009 Opposed Phasing: 0 Opposed Phasing: 0 Gen 2 PM 0 0 0 Opposed Phasing: 0
Counts Lane + Amb. + Area = Total Lane + Project Total Lane Adjusted Total Lane
PM Peak: 4:30 PM Volume Lanes Volume Growth Projects Volume Lanes Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume
Left 0 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lt-Th N/B RTOR: 0 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0
Thru Existing: 50% 0 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Th-Rt Projected: 50% 0 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0
Right Mitigated: 50% 0 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0
Northbound
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Shared 0 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0
Left 0 0 0 0 (20%) 0 0 0 0
27 2 41 69 3 72 0 72
Lt-Th S/B RTOR: 0 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0
Thru Existing: 50% 0 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Th-Rt Projected: 50% 0 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0
Right Mitigated: 50% 0 0 0 0 (5%) 0 0 0 0
Southbound
33 2 53 88 1 89 0 89
Shared 1 59 1 157 0% 1 161 1 161
Left 0 0 0 0 5% 0 0 0 0
37 2 96 135 1 136 0 136
Lt-Th E/B RTOR: 1 311 1 477 0% 1 478 1 478
Thru Existing: 50% 0 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0
274 17 51 342 0 342 0 342
Th-Rt Projected: 50% 0 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0
Right Mitigated: 50% 0 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0
Eastbound
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Shared 0 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0
Left 0 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lt-Th W/B RTOR: 0 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0
Thru Existing: 50% 0 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0
283 17 29 329 0 329 0 329
Th-Rt Projected: 50% 1 314 1 410 0% 1 416 1 416
Right Mitigated: 50% 0 0 0 0 20% 0 0 0 0
Westbound
32 2 48 82 6 88 0 88
Shared 0 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0
Critical Volumes: North-South: 59 North-South: 157 North-South: 161 North-South: 161
East-West: 625 East-West: 888 East-West: 895 East-West: 895
Total: 685 Total: 1044 Total: 1055 Total: 1055
Volume/capacity (v/c ) ratio: 0.570 0.870 0.880 0.880
v/c less ATSAC adjustment: 0.570 0.870 0.880 0.880
Level of Service (LOS): A D D D
PROJECT IMPACT
Filename: \\Otcnas\Otcnas\Share\Project 2008\Andora-Plummer\CMACalc 3.9.xls Change in v/c due to project: 0.010 Δv/c after mitigation: 0.010
Developed 2005-2007 by Ken Aitchison Significantly impacted? NO Fully mitigated? N/A