Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
ME 102
Data Analysis and Interpretation
Lecture-1, Role of Statistics in Engineering
Kannan Iyer
Kiyer@iitb.ac.in
26-07-2015
GVO (%)
41.7
45.8
50.0
54.2
Q (m3/s)
58.3
62.5
66.7
70.8
75.0
80.676
86.638
92.742
98.441
102.964
5087.57
178.07
(kN-m)
162.93
149.63
3968.65
4267.66
4575.03
4861.88
Q (m3/s)
65.376
70.983
77.332
83.006
88.827
94.270
98.568
(kN-m)
2954.99
3237.63
3555.17
3831.58
4105.11
4360.78
4562.15
Q (m3/s)
62.698
68.089
74.246
79.671
85.293
90.438
94.536
(kN-m)
2634.11
2892.73
3183.58
3437.33
3692.30
3918.48
4097.20
Q (m3/s)
54.512
60.249
65.485
71.333
76.597
82.030
86.922
90.813
(kN-m)
2077.13
2351.53
2590.84
2861.67
3096.78
3326.72
3533.47
3694.85
137.90
Q = a + bH + cF + dH 2 + eHF + fHF 2
In the above equation, a-f are constants, H and F are
head and fraction of opening of the valve.
The constants a-f were dependent on the angular
speed of the turbine, each of which was a quadratic.
The above is an approximate intuitive
representation. Let us look at its success in
predicting the data
Propagation of Errors
Q
Parity Line
30
60
Mean Error
Std_Dev
90
120
Q-data
150
-0.000014
0.007
180
Torque parity
Mean Error
Std_Dev
-0.006142
0.034
10,000
8,000
T-Fit
Q-Fit
Flow parity
180
150
120
90
60
30
0
Torque
Parity
6,000
4,000
2,000
0
0
2000
4000 6000
T-Data
8000
10000
26-07-2015
Variability
Role of Jitter
Statistical techniques are useful for describing and
understanding variability.
In our example, when the data was obtained, there
would have been some error, which may introduce
variability in predictions
Many times, the physics itself may be variable. The
classic example of this is radioactivity.
If we count a sample repeatedly for a given time,
we will find that the counts are not the same. It can
be shown that this follows what is called Poisson
distribution.
Turbulent flow is another example.
Demings Experiment-I
Marbles were dropped through a funnel onto a
target and the location where the marble struck
the target was recorded.
Variation was caused by several factors:
Marble placement in funnel & release
dynamics, vibration, air currents, etc.
Demings Experiment-II
The funnel was aligned with the center of the
target. Marbles were dropped. The distance from
the strike point to the target center was measured
and recorded.
Two strategies were adopted.
Strategy 1: The funnel was not moved. Then the
process was repeated.
Strategy 2: The funnel was moved an equal
distance in the opposite direction to compensate
for the error. Then the process was repeated.
Ref: Applied Statistics and Probability for Engineers, by Montgomery and Runger.
26-07-2015
Demings Experiment-III
Control Chart-I
The lesson of the Deming experiment is that a
process should not be adjusted in response to
random variations.
However, when a clear shift in the process value
becomes apparent, suitable adjustments can be
made.
To identify the shift, a control chart is employed.
Output values, plotted over time along with the outer
limits of normal variation to indicate when the
process leaves normal values.
Control Chart-II
Probability Models
26-07-2015
Way Forward
We have got some feel for the general variation
issues, and how statistical concepts may be used.
We have seen certain nuances but we need to
understand more details and these will be
introduced as the course grows.
We shall begin the next class with Sampling and
Descriptive Characteristics.