Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
www.elsevier.com/locate/humpath
Original contribution
Department of Pathology and Microbiology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, 983135 Nebraska Medical Center,
Omaha, NE 68198-3135, USA
b
Compound Safety Prediction, Pfizer, Inc, Groton, CT 06340, USA
Received 5 March 2013; revised 16 May 2013; accepted 17 May 2013
Keywords:
Hemangiosarcoma;
Hemangioma;
Hematopoietic stem cells;
Endothelial progenitor
cells;
Immunohistochemistry
Summary Hemangiosarcomas are uncommon aggressive vascular tumors that have recently become
the focus of attention because several chemicals and pharmaceuticals increase their incidence in mice.
The relevance of these mouse vascular tumors to humans is unclear. In the present study, we semiquantitatively evaluated the expression profiles of hematopoietic stem cell markers (CD117 [c-kit],
CD133, CD34, and CD45), endothelial cell markers (vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2,
CD31, and factor VIIIrelated antigen), and a myeloid lineage cell marker (CD14) in human hemangiosarcoma (n = 12) and hemangioma (n = 10) specimens using immunohistochemistry. CD133 was
completely negative in almost all cases of hemangiosarcomas and hemangiomas. Most hemangiosarcomas, but not hemangiomas, stained for CD117 and CD45. Both groups diffusely expressed CD34,
vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2, and factor VIIIrelated antigen; however, hemangiomas
had more intense and diffuse CD34 and factor VIIIrelated antigen expression compared with hemangiosarcomas, whereas CD31 was positive in all hemangiosarcomas but only half of the hemangiomas.
CD14 staining was negative in most hemangiosarcoma and hemangioma cases. Our results indicate that
multipotential bone marrowderived hematopoietic stem cells or early endothelial progenitor cells
(EPCs) expressing CD117, CD34, and CD45 are involved in hemangiosarcoma formation, whereas
hemangiomas originate from late EPCs or differentiated endothelial cells, which have lost the expression of most hematopoietic stem cell markers. This contrasts with our previous results that demonstrated
that both hemangiosarcomas and hemangiomas in mice may be derived from early EPCs that are not
completely differentiated.
2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
Hemangiosarcomas are rare aggressive malignant tumors
in humans and usually have no known cause [1,2]. The only
known causes of hemangiosarcomas in humans include a
few rare genetic disorders, previous irradiation, and exposure
to certain genotoxic agents such as vinyl chloride and thorotrast [3,4]. Recently, it was reported that a wide range of
2303
differentiation. Different from mouse EC tumors [15], canine
hemangiosarcoma cell lines expressed CD117, CD133,
CD34, and, in some cases, CD45 and CD14 [7]. However,
their expression pattern in canine EC tumors in vivo is not
yet available. In humans, one study showed that CD117
expression was observed in hemangiosarcomas (15%) [4].
Some case reports demonstrated that CD45 expression is
negative in hemangiosarcomas [1619], whereas CD34,
VEGFR2, CD31, and factor VIIIrelated antigen expression
has been demonstrated in hemangiosarcomas and hemangiomas [4,16,17,2022]. However, expression of CD133 and
CD14 in human EC tumors is not well understood.
In the present study, we evaluated the expression profiles
for hematopoietic stem cell markers (CD117, CD133, CD34,
and CD45), EC markers (VEGFR2, CD31, and factor VIII
related antigen), and a myeloid cell marker (CD14) in human
hemangiosarcomas and hemangiomas. These tumors were
also stained with the p53 tumor suppressor protein because
this marker has been present in most hemangiosarcomas in
humans, but not in human hemangiomas or in any mouse
vascular tumor types [3]
2.2. Immunohistochemistry
Immunohistochemical procedures including antibodies
and negative controls for primary antibodies used in our
study are summarized in Table 2. Formalin-fixed and
paraffin-embedded tissues were deparaffinized and rehydrated through graded alcohols. Endogenous peroxidase
activity was quenched with 3% hydrogen peroxide, followed
by heat-induced antigen retrieval using Leica Bond Max
(Leica Biosystems, Buffalo Grove, IL) for 20 minutes at
100C in citrate buffer, pH 6.0; ER1 (Leica Biosystems) for
CD117 and VEGFR2 staining or EDTA, pH 9.0; ER2 (Leica
Biosystems) for CD133, CD45, CD34, CD31, CD14, and
2304
Table 1
L. Liu et al.
Summary of patients' clinical information
Tumors
Hemangiosarcomas
Hemangiomas
Patient ID Age
Sex Location
1
2
3
4
5
81
48
48
60
85
F
F
M
M
F
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
60
65
99
82
77
34
70
86
17
36
66
10
mo
49
62
81
47
41
F
F
M
F
F
M
M
F
M
M
M
F
Skin, chest
Breast
Leg
Kidney
Soft tissue, right
forearm
Breast
Breast
Skin, forehead
Breast
Skin, chest
Pleura
Skin, face
Breast
Muscle
Soft tissue
Skin
Skin
M
M
F
F
M
Liver
Skin
Bone
Sinus
Bone
18
19
20
21
22 b
3. Results
For each immunostain, no major differences were observed between males and females or between different
tissues containing the vascular tumors, in terms of staining
pattern and/or intensity (data not shown).
Fig. 1 Hemangiosarcomas (A) and hemangiomas (B) stained by H&E (10). The hemangiosarcomas were hypercellular and composed of
spindle cells with significant atypia, forming anastomosing immature vascular channels. Hemangiomas showed anastomosing vascular
structures lined by bland ECs.
2305
Description of
antibodies and
blocking reagents
Manufacturer
Internal positive
control cells
CD 117
Normal rabbit serum
RTU
ER1
RTU
Leica
Polymer
GIST
1.0 mg/mL
ER2
1:100
Leica
Polymer
Not applicable
RTU
ER2
RTU
Leukocytes
RTU
ER2
RTU
Leica
Polymer
Leica
Polymer
Vascular
endothelium
Unknown
ER1
1:200
Leica
Polymer
Vascular
endothelium
RTU
ER2
RTU
Leica
Polymer
Vascular
endothelium
RTU
ER1
RTU
Leica
Polymer
Vascular
endothelium
Unknown
ER2
1:100
Leica
Polymer
Neutrophils
RTU
ER2
RTU
Leica
Polymer
Tumor cells
PROM1 (CD133)
Normal rabbit serum
CD45
Not used
CD34
Normal rabbit serum
VEGFR2
Normal rabbit serum
CD31
Normal rabbit serum
Factor VIIIrelated
antigen
Normal rabbit serum
CD14
Normal rabbit serum
p53
Normal rabbit serum
Jackson ImmunoResearch
(001-000-001)
Leica (NCL-CD14-223)
Jackson ImmunoResearch
(001-000-001)
DAKO (IR616)
Jackson ImmunoResearch (001000-001)
NOTE. Cell Marque, Rocklin, CA; Millipore, Auburn, CA; DAKO, Carpinteria, CA; Cell Signaling, Danvers, MA; GeneTex, Irvine, CA; Jackson
ImmunoResearch, West Grove, PA.
Abbreviations: ER1, Leica Bond Epitope Retrieval Citrate pH 6.0; ER2, Leica Bond Epitope Retrieval EDTA pH 9.0; GIST, gastrointestinal stromal tumor;
N/A, not applicable; RTU, ready to use.
3.2. EC markers
The percentage of cells staining positive for VEGFR2
was similar between hemangiosarcomas and hemangiomas
(Table 3); more than 75% of cells stained in most cases.
However, the staining intensity for VEGFR2 was stronger in
the hemangiosarcoma cases (Fig. 3A and Table 3) than the
hemangioma cases (Fig. 3B and Table 3). CD31 tumor cell
staining was observed in all cases of hemangiosarcoma
(ranging from moderate to strong; Fig. 3C and Table 3),
although only 5 hemangioma cases were positive for CD31
(ranging from weak to strong; Fig. 3D and Table 3). Factor
VIIIrelated antigen staining was focal and relatively weak
in hemangiosarcoma cases (Fig. 3E and Table 3), whereas it
was strong and diffuse in hemangioma specimens (Fig. 3F
and Table 3).
2306
L. Liu et al.
Fig. 2 Immunostains for hematopoietic stem cell markers showed that hemangiosarcomas were positive for CD117 (A) and CD45 (E) and
patchy positive for CD34 (C); hemangiomas were negative for CD117 (B) and CD45 (F) and positive for CD34 (D). Several cases of
hemangiosarcoma showed scattered positive cells for CD45 in the lesions. However, they were interpreted as indeterminate owing to the lack
of vasculature in the solid lesion and possible contamination of CD45-expressing leukocytes (E, inset).
2307
Staining for markers and p53 in human hemangiosarcomas (HS) and hemangiomas (HA)
HA
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
20
22 a
4+
0
3+
0
4+
4+
3+
0
4+
1+
0
1+
0
0
1+
0
0
3+
0
0
0
1+
0
1+ s
m
0
0
s
0
s
0
m
0
0
s
0
m
0
0
m
0
0
0
w
0
0
0
w to m 0
0
0
0
w
0
4+ s
0
2+ s
0
0
ind
0
3+ s
4+ s
2+ s
4+ s
1+ s
4+ m to s ind
0
2+ s
4+ s
ind
3+ s
2+ s
1+ m to s 1+ s
2+ s
2+ s
4+ s
0
4+ s
0
4+ s
0
4+ s
0
4+ s
0
4+ s
0
4+ s
0
4+ s
0
4+ s
0
4+ s
2+ s
4+ s
1+ w
4+ s
1+ w to m
4+ s
4+ s
4+ s
4+ s
4+ s
4+ m to s
4+ s
4+ m to s
4+ s
1+ w
3+ w to m
4+ m
4+ s
4+ m
4+ m
4+ w to m
2+ w to m
3+ w to m
3+
3+
4+
1+
4+
4+
3+
3+
3+
4+
3+
4+
0
0
0
0
4+
3+
0
2+
4+
1+
s
m
s
m to s
s
s
m to s
s
m
s
s
s
Factor VIII
related antigen
4+ s
1+ w
3+ m
1+ m
4+ s
4+ m to
4+ m to
3+ m
4+ s
3+ m to
3+ m to
3+ s
4+ s
4+ s
4+ s
4+ s
m to s 4+ s
w
4+ s
4+ s
s
4+ s
s
4+ s
w to m 4+ s
s
s
s
s
0
0
0
2+ m
0
0
0
ind
0
1+ m
1+ s
1+ s
0
0
0
0
0
0
1+ m
0
0
2+ m
4+
1+
2+
1+
3+
1+
1+
1+
1+
1+
1+
3+
0
0
0
0
1+
0
0
0
0
1+
s
m
m
m
m
w
w
m
s
s
m
s
NOTE. Staining for markers in human HS and HA: 0, no positive staining in any of the tumor cells; 1+, positive staining in 25% or less of the tumor cells;
2+, positive staining in 26% to 50% of the tumor cells; 3+, positive staining in 51% to 75% of the tumor cells; 4+, positive staining in 76% to 100% of the
tumor cells.
Abbreviations: w, weak; m, moderate; s, strong; ind, indeterminate.
a
The patient has epithelioid hemangioma.
4. Discussion
In the present study, we showed that expression of CD117
and CD45 was observed in most hemangiosarcoma cases,
whereas they were negative in most of the hemangioma
cases. CD133 was negative and CD34 was positive for both
2308
L. Liu et al.
Fig. 3 Immunostains for EC markers demonstrated that hemangiosarcomas were strongly and diffusely positive for these 3 markers,
VEGFR2 (A), CD31 (C), and factor VIIIrelated antigen (E); hemangiomas were weakly positive for VEGFR2 (B), partially positive for
CD31 (D), and strongly positive for factor VIIIrelated antigen (F).
2309
Fig. 4 Immunostains for myeloid lineage cell marker CD14 and tumor suppressor protein p53 revealed that several hemangiosarcomas
showed focal CD14 positivity (A), whereas a majority were negative for CD14 and positive for p53 (C); hemangiomas were largely negative
for CD14 (B) and p53 protein (D).
recently been demonstrated [13,26]. In addition, coexpression of a dendritic cell marker and EC markers was observed
in human infantile hemangioma [27]. Also, it is possible that
myeloid-derived cells are involved in the hemangiosarcoma
formation in dogs, at least in some cases [7]. A few hemangiosarcomas (4/12) demonstrated CD14 positivity; this supports the possibility of involvement of myeloid-derived cells
in the pathogenesis of the disease.
In contrast to human specimens, murine spontaneous and
chemically induced hemangiosarcomas and hemangiomas
showed similar expression profiles: both entities were negative for CD45, factor VIIIrelated antigen, and CD14, and
positive for CD34 (stronger than internal vasculature control), VEGFR2, and CD31 [15]. Based on the increased
intensity of CD34 and the lack of factor VIIIrelated antigen
in these tumors, we concluded that both types of the mouse
tumors may be derived from early EPCs that are not completely differentiated [15]. The origin of these 2 vascular
tumors appears to be different between mice and humans.
For example, although hematopoietic stem cells and/or
circulating EPCs seem to be involved in both mouse and
human hemangiosarcoma formation, CD45 was positive for
human vascular tumors but not for mice. In addition, human
hemangiosarcoma cases are positive for factor VIIIrelated
2310
L. Liu et al.
Fig. 5 A, One case diagnosed as epithelioid hemangioma showed spindle to epithelioid cells with mild atypia forming anastomosis vascular
channels. The neoplastic cells stained positive for CD117 (weak) (B), CD45 (C), and p53 (D).
antigen, indicating that they retain the ability to further differentiate similar to canines [28], whereas mouse tumor cells
are arrested at a stage before complete differentiation owing
to the lack of factor VIIIrelated antigen. Although mouse
hemangiomas may consist of early EPCs, human hemangiomas showed diminished intensity of VEGFR2 and CD31
and increased expression of factor VIIIrelated antigen, a
staining pattern of late EPCs or differentiated ECs.
We also investigated the expression of the tumor suppressor gene TP53 in human hemangiosarcomas and
hemangiomas. Wild-type p53 protein has a short half-life;
however, the mutated (inactivated) form of p53 protein is
stabilized and can be detected in the nucleus of neoplastic
cells [29]. Studies have reported that in humans, immunostains for p53 were almost entirely negative in hemangiomas
[30], whereas nuclei of malignant cells in hemangiosarcomas
stained positive for p53 [18,31]. Furthermore, TP53 mutations
in exons 5 to 8 were observed in spontaneous and vinyl
chlorideinduced hemangiosarcomas in humans [32,33].
There was moderate to strong nuclear staining for p53 in all
hemangiosarcomas in the current study, whereas only 2
hemangiomas showed weak staining.
Our findings for the expression profile of the epithelial
hemangioma warrant further exploration. This specific entity
exhibited an expression profile similar to hemangiosarcomas, positive for CD45, CD117, and p53, which indicates
these cells might be derived from EPCs and might have
malignant potential.
Our study showed relative heterogeneity of the expression
profile of hemangiosarcomas, although a clear trend of the
expressed markers indicates the different origins of hemangiosarcoma and hemangioma in humans. The heterogeneity might
be caused by intratumor clonal diversity, dysregulation of
different proteins because of genomic or epigenetic modifications, or aberrant expression of transcription factors, microRNAs, and so on, and even sampling issues of the tumor [34].
In summary, our study indicates that human hemangiosarcomas are most likely derived from hematopoietic stem
cell/EPCs with high malignant potential compared with
hemangiomas. Human hemangiomas are formed from late
EPCs or differentiated ECs. Hemangiosarcomas and hemangiomas appear to be 2 different entities with distinct
pathogenesis, and hemangiomas are unlikely to transform
into hemangiosarcomas. There is also no evidence that
human hemangiosarcomas (rare tumors) arise from hemangiomas (common tumors) or any other benign precursor [3].
Thus, our findings raise questions regarding the relevance of
the mouse model to human vascular tumors.
Acknowledgments
We gratefully appreciate Cheryl Putnam (University of
Nebraska Medical Center) for her assistance with the preparation of this manuscript. We also thank Drs Jon C. Cook
and Leslie A. Obert (Pfizer, Inc) for advice and comments
regarding this project.
References
[1] Hardisty JF, Elwell MR, Ernst H, et al. Histopathology of
hemangiosarcomas in mice and hamsters and liposarcomas/fibrosarcomas in rats associated with PPAR agonists. Toxicol Pathol 2007;35:
928-41.
[2] Krishnan Unni K, Inwards CY, Bridge JA, et al. Malignant vascular
tumor. In: Silverberg S, editor. Tumors of the bones and joints. AFIP.
Washington, DC: AFIP/ARP; 2005. p. 266-73.
[3] Cohen SM, Storer RD, Criswell KA, et al. Hemangiosarcoma in
rodents: mode-of-action evaluation and human relevance. Toxicol Sci
2009;111:4-18.
[4] Yonemori K, Tsuta K, Ando M, et al. Contrasting prognostic implications of platelet-derived growth factor receptor-beta and vascular
endothelial growth factor receptor-2 in patients with angiosarcoma.
Ann Surg Oncol 2011;18:2841-50.
[5] Kakiuchi-Kiyota S, Vetro JA, Suzuki S, et al. Effects of the
PPARgamma agonist troglitazone on endothelial cells in vivo and in
vitro: differences between human and mouse. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol
2009;237:83-90.
[6] Krishnan Unni K, Inwards CY, Bridge JA, et al. Hemangiomas. In:
Silverberg S, editor. Tumors of the bones and joints. AFIP.
Washington, DC: AFIP/ARP; 2005. p. 261-5.
[7] Lamerato-Kozicki AR, Helm KM, Jubala CM, Cutter GC, Modiano
JF. Canine hemangiosarcoma originates from hematopoietic precursors with potential for endothelial differentiation. Exp Hematol
2006;34:870-8.
[8] Hristov M, Weber C. Endothelial progenitor cells: characterization,
pathophysiology, and possible clinical relevance. J Cell Mol Med
2004;8:498-508.
[9] Urbich C, Dimmeler S. Endothelial progenitor cells: characterization
and role in vascular biology. Circ Res 2004;95:343-53.
[10] Hristov M, Erl W, Weber PC. Endothelial progenitor cells: mobilization, differentiation, and homing. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol
2003;23:1185-9.
[11] Beaudry P, Hida Y, Udagawa T, et al. Endothelial progenitor cells
contribute to accelerated liver regeneration. J Pediatr Surg 2007;42:
1190-8.
[12] Hermiston ML, Xu Z, Weiss A. CD45: a critical regulator of
signaling thresholds in immune cells. Annu Rev Immunol 2003;21:
107-37.
[13] Yoder MC, Mead LE, Prater D, et al. Redefining endothelial
progenitor cells via clonal analysis and hematopoietic stem/progenitor
cell principals. Blood 2007;109:1801-9.
[14] Harach HR, Jasani B, Williams ED. Factor VIII as a marker of
endothelial cells in follicular carcinoma of the thyroid. J Clin Pathol
1983;36:1050-4.
2311
[15] Kakiuchi-Kiyota S, Crabbs TA, Arnold LL, et al. Evaluation of
expression profiles of hematopoietic stem cell, endothelial cell, and
myeloid cell antigens in spontaneous and chemically induced
hemangiosarcomas and hemangiomas in mice. Toxicol Pathol
2012;41:709-21.
[16] Lin BT, Weiss LM, Battifora H. Intravascularly disseminated angiosarcoma: true neoplastic angioendotheliomatosis? Report of two cases.
Am J Surg Pathol 1997;21:1138-43.
[17] Forton GE, Van Parys G, Hertveldt K. Primary angiosarcoma of the
non-irradiated parotid gland: a most uncommon, highly malignant
tumor. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2005;262:173-7.
[18] Terada T. Angiosarcoma of the oral cavity. Head Neck Pathol 2011;5:
67-70.
[19] Kuroda N, Hamaguchi N, Inoue K, et al. Application of immunocytochemistry to the diagnosis of primary epithelioid angiosarcoma of
the lung. Med Mol Morphol 2009;42:250-3.
[20] Poblet E, Gonzalez-Palacios F, Jimenez FJ. Different immunoreactivity of endothelial markers in well and poorly differentiated areas of
angiosarcomas. Virchows Arch 1996;428:217-21.
[21] Itakura E, Yamamoto H, Oda Y, Tsuneyoshi M. Detection and
characterization of vascular endothelial growth factors and their
receptors in a series of angiosarcomas. J Surg Oncol 2008;97:74-81.
[22] Breiteneder-Geleff S, Soleiman A, Kowalski H, et al. Angiosarcomas
express mixed endothelial phenotypes of blood and lymphatic
capillaries: podoplanin as a specific marker for lymphatic endothelium.
Am J Pathol 1999;154:385-94.
[23] Fetsch J. Epitheloid hemangioma. In: Fletcher CU, KK. Mertens F,
editors. WHO classification of tumors of soft tissue and bone. Lyon,
France: IARC Press; 2002. p. 159-60.
[24] Peichev M, Naiyer AJ, Pereira D, et al. Expression of VEGFR-2 and
AC133 by circulating human CD34(+) cells identifies a population of
functional endothelial precursors. Blood 2000;95:952-8.
[25] Kanayasu-Toyoda T, Yamaguchi T, Oshizawa T, Hayakawa T. CD31
(PECAM-1)-bright cells derived from AC133-positive cells in human
peripheral blood as endothelial-precursor cells. J Cell Physiol 2003;
195:119-29.
[26] Kim SJ, Kim JS, Papadopoulos J, et al. Circulating monocytes
expressing CD31: implications for acute and chronic angiogenesis.
Am J Pathol 2009;174:1972-80.
[27] Ritter MR, Reinisch J, Friedlander SF, Friedlander M. Myeloid cells in
infantile hemangioma. Am J Pathol 2006;168:621-8.
[28] Von Beust BR, Suter MM, Summers BA. Factor VIIIrelated antigen
in canine endothelial neoplasms: an immunohistochemical study. Vet
Pathol 1988;25:251-5.
[29] Hong HL, Ton TV, Devereux TR, et al. Chemical-specific alterations
in ras, p53, and beta-catenin genes in hemangiosarcomas from
B6C3F1 mice exposed to o-nitrotoluene or riddelliine for 2 years.
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 2003;191:227-34.
[30] Iwata J, Sonobe H, Furihata M, Ido E, Ohtsuki Y. High frequency of
apoptosis in infantile capillary haemangioma. J Pathol 1996;179:403-8.
[31] Meis-Kindblom JM, Kindblom LG. Angiosarcoma of soft tissue: a
study of 80 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 1998;22:683-97.
[32] Hollstein M, Marion MJ, Lehman T, et al. p53 mutations at A:T base
pairs in angiosarcomas of vinyl chlorideexposed factory workers.
Carcinogenesis 1994;15:1-3.
[33] Naka N, Tomita Y, Nakanishi H, et al. Mutations of p53 tumorsuppressor gene in angiosarcoma. Int J Cancer 1997;71:952-5.
[34] Marusyk A, Polyak K. Tumor heterogeneity: causes and consequences. Biochim Biophys Acta 1805;2010:105-17.