Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 27

Cartography of oil reserves and recovery

factors of petroleum reservoirs


IOR/EOR methods
to increase ultimate recovery

G. Renard R. Vially - J-F. Argillier

Proved Oil Reserves (2009)

IFP

Total with oil sands : 1517 Gb

G. Renard R. Vially J-F. Argilllier

IFP Energies nouvelles

Oil recovery
Primary
Recovery

Conventional oil recovery


Pumping/ Gas lift /
horizontal drilling

Natural drainage

IFP

Borregales 1977

Steam
In situ combustion

N2

G. Renard R. Vially J-F. Argilllier

Alkaline
Foam IFP Energies nouvelles

Oil recovery
Conventional oil recovery

Primary
Recovery

Pumping/ Gas lift /


horizontal drilling

Natural drainage

Drive

Secondary
recovery

Water flood

RF (sandstones)

Pressure maintenance
Water flood / Gas flood
Gas cycling

25-45%

IFP

Worldwide average : 35 % but large variations

G. Renard R. Vially J-F. Argilllier

IFP Energies nouvelles

IFP

Example of the North Sea

G. Renard R. Vially J-F. Argilllier

IFP Energies nouvelles

Secondary and Tertiary recovery


how to increase displacement efficiency
oil that remains in the part of the reservoir
already swept
how to increase sweep efficiency

IFP

oil that remains in the part of the reservoir


not swept
6

G. Renard R. Vially J-F. Argilllier

IFP Energies nouvelles

Oil recovery
Conventional oil recovery

Primary
Recovery

Pumping/ Gas lift /


horizontal drilling

Natural drainage
Secondary
recovery

Drive

Pressure maintenance
Water flood / Gas flood
Gas cycling

Water flood

Tertiary recovery

Thermal

IFP

Gas miscible/immiscible

Steam
In situ combustion

Hydrocarbon
CO2
N2

G. Renard R. Vially J-F. Argilllier

Enhanced Oil Recovery


(increased RF +10-20%)

Chemical

Other

Polymer
Microbial
Surfactant
Alkaline
Foam IFP Energies nouvelles

Mechanisms of action
action on sweep
efficiency at the
macroscopic scale

polymer flooding

by increasing d

foam drive / WAG

by decreasing o

CO2 drive
steam drive
in situ combustion

by using a miscible
displacing fluid

HC gas, CO2, N2

by reducing the
interfacial tension

surfactant flooding

by action on the
rock wettability

alkaline flooding

IFP

action on
displacement
efficiency at the
pore scale

by increasing w

G. Renard R. Vially J-F. Argilllier

IFP Energies nouvelles

IOR / EOR
IOR

Enhanced Oil Recovery

Improved Oil Recovery

EOR will involve processes in


order to act on the reservoir
recovery mechanisms
Mobility control
Reduction of Sor
Increase of miscibility

Based on technologies, IOR


evolves versus time according to
various standards across the
world and among the companies
Smart wells
Reservoir management
Reservoir characterization
Down hole separation, ...

IFP

EOR

G. Renard R. Vially J-F. Argilllier

IFP Energies nouvelles

Optimized reservoir management


and monitoring
Well productivity
improvement

Acidification, stimulation,
reduction of formation damage

Better drainage
architecture

Horizontal wells, Multilaterals,


SAGD, VAPEX, THAI

Reduction of
uncertainties

Reservoir characterization,
fractured reservoirs, 4D seismics

IFP

Stacked multibranch well

10

Cluster well

Dual opposing laterals

Multidrain or multilateral well

G. Renard R. Vially J-F. Argilllier

Re-entry laterals from a


vertical well

3D Well

IFP Energies nouvelles

EOR at work

IFP

EOR consists in injecting specific fluids into a reservoir


to help recovering some portion of remaining oil

11

+1% Recovery factor = 2 to 3 years additional reserves!


G. Renard R. Vially J-F. Argilllier

IFP Energies nouvelles

Steam injection processes


HUFF AND PUFF

STEAM DRIVE

SAGD

SAP

IFP

12

G. Renard R. Vially J-F. Argilllier

IFP Energies nouvelles

Polymer flooding
(Macroscopic sweeping)
When polymer is added to the drive brine it reduces M and leads more
to a piston like displacement and hence higher recovery efficiency
w = 0.1 oil

Water Saturation

w = oil

water injection

polymer injection

Unfavorable mobility ratio M, results in an inefficiency of the


water flood oil displacement mechanism

IFP

Definition of
mobility ratio

krw

w

13

kro

o

krw = Water Relative Permeability, fraction


w= Water viscosity, cp
kro = Oil Relative Permeability, fraction
O= Oil viscosity, cp

RFmax: +10-15%
G. Renard R. Vially J-F. Argilllier

IFP Energies nouvelles

Surfactant flooding
(Microscopic mobilization)
Core scale

/ Sorw

To remobilize oil, capillary number


Ca, must be significantly increased

Residual oil
saturation vs
capillary number

IFP

This can be achieved by lowering g


with optimized surfactant formulations
14

G. Renard R. Vially J-F. Argilllier

IFP Energies nouvelles

ASP process

Polymer

Surfactant

mobility ratio
decrease interfacial tension

Alkaline

decrease surfactant adsorption


ionize natural surfactants

water
water
drive

Water
Polymer

Surfactant Alkali

Oil bank
Oil

IFP

Oil

15

G. Renard R. Vially J-F. Argilllier

IFP Energies nouvelles

Chemicals
Adsorption

Use of polymer
Very favorable mobility

Depends on:
Brine, rock (clays)
pH
Temperature
Additives

biodegradation
ecotoxicity

ratio required
Mobility
Ratio

Stability
(thermal)
Formulation
Performance

Long chain & adapted chemistries


Sourcing (raw materials) is critical
Adapted synthesis process

IFT

Solubility

Robust surfactants
& polymers are
required

Depends on:
Brine
Surfactant-polymer interactions
Surfactant-surfactant interaction
Temperature
Additives (cosolvents)

IFP

Objective:
Design a formulation that will
give optimal performance based
on economical considerations

16

potential of green chemistry?


G. Renard R. Vially J-F. Argilllier

IFP Energies nouvelles

Screening criteria (heavy oils)


Technologies

Primary cold production (reference)


Water flooding or HC miscible
Partial miscible CO2 flood
Polymer flooding
CHOPS
VAPEX
In situ combustion
Cyclic Steam Stimulation
Steam flood
SAGD

IFP

Regions

10-3

17

10-3

10-2
10-1
101
100
North Sea
Brazil
Indonesia
USA (Cal.)
Venezuela
USA (Alaska)
Canada
10-2

10-1

G. Renard R. Vially J-F. Argilllier

100

101

/k (cp/mD)
102

103

/k (cp/mD)
102

IFP Energies nouvelles

103

EOR target in the world


Conventional
Crudes

Heavy, extra-heavy and


bitumen (API<20)

5 700 Gb

5 000 Gb

Nonrecoverable
today

Nonrecoverable
today

3 800 Gb

4 250 Gb

Recoverable with
present
technologies

Recoverable with
present
technologies

700 Gb

IFP

900 Gb

18

Already
produced

Already
produced

1 000 Gb

50 Gb

G. Renard R. Vially J-F. Argilllier

IFP Energies nouvelles

Worldwide EOR production in 2008


Canada
18%

Source: Oil & Gas Journal + IFP

USA 28%
Mexico

China

22%
Venezuela
16%
Thermal
Chemical
HC
injection
CO2
Ninjection
injection

19

Indonesia
8%
~ 2.3 Mb/j

Other countries ~0.5%


India, Colombia,
Trinidad, Brsil

IFP

7%

G. Renard R. Vially J-F. Argilllier

2.5 % of the
world oil
production
IFP Energies nouvelles

2008 EOR production


Breakdown by recovery method
Terms of Production
Others
0%

Nitrogen
injection
22%

98% steam
1.5% combustion in
situ
<1% hot water

CO2 injection
12%

Thermal
52%

Hydrocarbon
gas injection
12%

Source: IFP + Oil & Gas Journal

IFP

Chemical
2%

20

G. Renard R. Vially J-F. Argilllier

IFP Energies nouvelles

2008 EOR production


Breakdown by recovery method
Nb of actives projects
Nitrogen
injection (6)

CO2 injection

Microbial (2)

122

157

About 350 active projects

Thermal

133 steam
21 combustion in situ

38

3 hot water
Chemical (23)

IFP

Hydrocarbon
gas injection

21

G. Renard R. Vially J-F. Argilllier

IFP Energies nouvelles

2000-2008
EOR production evolution
2.361

2.224

2.278

2.399

2.295

2008/2006
-4.3%

3 000
2 500

Production
000 b/d

Production Mb/d

EOR Total
Nitrogen injection
Chemical
HC gas injection
CO2 injection
Thermal

2 000
1 500
1 000
500

IFP

22

2000

2002

G. Renard R. Vially J-F. Argilllier

2004

2006

2008

Energies
Source: IFPIFP
+ Oil
& Gasnouvelles
Journal

2000-2008
EOR by number of projects
Active projects
314

308

302

348

400

2008/2006
+15%

350
300
Microbial
Nitrogen injection
Chemical
HC gas injection
CO2 injection
Thermal

250
200
150
100
50

IFP

23

2002

2004

G. Renard R. Vially J-F. Argilllier

2006

2008
IFP Energies nouvelles

EOR Costs & Recovery Rate


Solvent aided
process

30

Costs in $/b

25

Surfactantflood

20

CO2

15

Steam
10

Polymerflood

Waterflood

0
0%

10%

20%

40%

50%

60%

Recovery factor

IFP

24

30%

G. Renard R. Vially J-F. Argilllier

IFP Energies nouvelles

70%

IFP

Chemical EOR Alliance

25

G. Renard R. Vially J-F. Argilllier

IFP Energies nouvelles

IFP

Chemical EOR project milestones

26

G. Renard R. Vially J-F. Argilllier

IFP Energies nouvelles

Conclusions

EOR production is increasing but slowly

Despite a context of high oil price & increasing demand

Today evolution technologies

Steam is decreasing for very viscous crude

CO2 is highly increasing

Environmental impact of high water consumption


Price of gas, high CO2 emissions for others
Additional revenues for CCS
Answer to global warming concern

Chemical injection, mainly polymer flood

IFP

Allow to enhance waterflood, widely used technology


As a wide potential
Not no expensive technology

27

G. Renard R. Vially J-F. Argilllier

IFP Energies nouvelles

Вам также может понравиться