Final Program

1
Final program
Conference overview
Monday 8 June
Pre-conference courses (See www.aquaconsoil.org for details)
14:00-18:00
18:30-20:00
Welcome reception in town hall
Tuesday 9 June
Plenary opening session
9:00-10:30
Welcome by chairmen
Presentation by Ida Holm Olesen,
President of the ATV Foundation of Soil and Groundwater
Head of Section, Department of Environmental and Natural Resources,
The Region of Southern Denmark
Lecture by Steen Gade, member of Parliament, member of the
Environment Committee in Parliament, Chairman of the Climate, Energy
and Building Committee in Parliament, member of the Nordic Council
Scientific key lecture by Prof. Poul Lgstrup Bjerg,
DTU Environment, Head of Water Resources
Engineering Section, Department of Environmental
Engineering, the Technical University of Denmark
10:30-11:00
11:00-12:30
Break
Parallel lecture sessions and special sessions
See next pages for details per session
12:30-14:00
14:00-15:30
Lunch
15:30-16:00
16:00-17:30
Break
17:30-18:30
Poster social event

The overview of posters will be provided soon
Wednesday 10 June
Parallel lecture sessions and special sessions & matchmaking
9:00-10:30
See next pages for details per session; details about matchmaking will be provided soon
10:30-11:00
11:00-12:30
Break
12:30-14:00
14:00-15:30
Lunch
15:30-16:00
16:00-17:30
Break
Thursday 11 June
9:00-10:30
10:30-11:00
11:00-12:30
Break
12:30-14:00
14:00-15:30
Lunch
15:30-16:00
16:00-17:30
Break
20:00
Friday 12 June
9:00-10:30
Conference dinner
10:30-11:00
11:00-12:00
Break
Plenary session
Conference highlights by AquaConSoil chairmen
Panel discussion on future developments
Poster awards

3
12:30 (start)
Technical tours
Tour 1 Novel methods for investigation and remediation of contaminated soil and groundwater
1a: Tour 1A: Sustainable exploitation of natural resources - Securing high quality
drinking water and natural resources for Copenhagen and creating recreational
facilities for the community at the same time
Tour 1B: Development of new investigation and remediation technologies
Tour 1C: Pollution in limestone aquifers- challenges and Remediation Methods

Tour 2 Inspirational tour: Historical contaminated sites in Copenhagen, redevelopment today
Tour 3 Innovations in subsurface utilization
Tour 4 Sustainability and climate change preparation in urban development of brownfields
See www.aquaconsoil.org for details (Events-tours)
Lecture sessions and special sessions

Note: This is the preliminary program, minor changes may occur.
Lecture sessions and special sessions per day and time slot
Tuesday 9 June
page
4 - 13
Wednesday 10 June
page 14 - 25
Thursday 11 June
page 26 - 37
Friday 12 June
page 38 - 40
5
Explanation:
Hall number
Regular thematic session (ThS) or Special session (SpS)
lecture title, presenter, co-authors, (institution, country)
Tuesday 9 June 11:00-12:30

Meeting Room 19
ThS 1A.1 Passive sampling
Chair: Frederic Coulon
Passive sampling for monitoring fate and transport of organic contaminants field
examples
Sarah Hale, Hans Peter Arp, Nicolas Morin, Gudny Okkenhaug, Gijs Breedveld, Mona
Hansen, Espen Eek, Paul Cappelen, Gerard Cornelissen, Amy Oen (Norwegian
Geotechnical Institute, NO).
Environmental forensic in groundwater by coupling passive sampling and high resolution
mass spectrometry for non-target screening
Coralie Soulier, Catherine Berho, Anne Togola (Brgm, DL)
Development and test of optical sensor for real time measurement of volatile organic
contaminants in air
Mette Christophersen, Lars Bennedsen, Jeppe Seidelin Dam, Peter Tidemand
Lichtenberg, Christian Pedersen, Nancy Hamburger, Helena Hansen, Mads Terkelsen
(Rambll Denmark, DK)
Integrated passive flux measurements in groundwater: Principles and outlook
Goedele Verreydt, Patrick Meire, Eric Struyf, Ilse Van Keer, Piet Seuntjens (University of
Antwerp, BE)
Innovative assessment and modeling tools to minimize confounding elements in vapor
intrusion investigations
Todd Creamer (Geosyntec Consultants, US)
Auditorium 11
ThS 1C.9 Bioremediation of chlorinated solvents in groundwater 1
Chair: Magda Grifoll
Effects of aquifer thermal energy storage on bioremediation of chlorinated ethenes
Zhuobiao Ni, Martijn Smit, Tim Grotenhuis (Wageningen University, NL), Pauline van
Gaans (Deltares, NL), Huub Rijnaarts (Wageningen University, NL)
"Post-mortem" of a successful ERD project in a German urban area
Laura Simone, Thomas Held (ARCADIS Deutschland GmbH, DE)
Bioremediation at low pH - emerging tools and approaches for chlorinated solvent sites
Jeff Roberts, Phil Dennis, Peter Dollar, Sandra Dworatzek (SiREM, CA)
Aerobic biodegradation of trichloroethene without auxiliary substrates
Kathrin Rachel Schmidt, Sarah Gaza, Andreas Tiehm (The German Water Centre - TZW,
DE)
Meeting the challenges for bioremediation of chlorinated solvents posed at operational
sites: a comparison of case studies
Richard Bewley, Paula Hick, Anthea Rawcliffe (URS Infrastructure & Environment UK
Limited, GB)
Auditorium 12
ThS 1C.18 Miscellaneous remediation topics 1
Chair: Hans-Peter Koschitzky
Intensive CSM development providing data for concise design of containment
Koen Enkels, Karolien Claeys, Bram De Keulenaere, Bart Callens, Karen Van Geert,
Wouter Gevaerts, Gerlinde De Moor (ARCADIS Belgium nv, BE)
Applying numerical contaminants F&T modelling for designing effective groundwater
remediation strategies
Aleksandra Kiecak, Grzegorz Malina, Ewa Kret, Tadeusz Szklarczyk (AGH University of
Science and Technology, PL)
In-situ chemical reduction: laboratory and pilot-scale studies for full-scale treatment of
chromium VI contaminated soils
Aldo Trezzi, Sara Ceccon, Roberto Pisterna (Environ, IT), Domenico Osella (Universit
del Piemonte Orientale, IT), Roberto De Franco (CNR IDPA, IT), Caterina Di Carlo
(Solvay Specialty Polymers Italy SpA, IT), Pierre Matz (Solvay SA, BE), Davide Musso
(Universit del Piemonte Orientale, IT), Grazia Caielli (CNR IDPA, IT)
Use of numerical models for understanding and design of surfactant enhanced
remediation
Sren Rygaard Lenschow, Anders Christensen (NIRAS, DK), Mette Marie Mygind
(Danish Ministry of Defense, DK), Phillip C. DeBlanc, Ahmad Seyedabbasi (GSI
Environmental Inc., US), Konstantinos Kostarelos (University of Houston, US)
Colloidal Fe-zeolites - A novel material for sorption-supported in-situ chemical oxidation
(ISCO)
Anett Georgi, Glenn Gillies, Katrin Mackenzie, Frank-Dieter Kopinke (Helmholtz Centre
for Environmental Research, DE)
Meeting Room 20
SpS 1D.4S Holistic water planning: How do we protect groundwater in Denmark?
Organizers: The Danish Knowledge Exchange Group
Chair: Rolf Johnsen, Central Denmark Region
The groundwater resource in Denmark accounts for 99 % of the country's drinking water
supply, and it is a major source of irrigation water for agricultural land. This means that, in
Denmark, we have a very long tradition of managing and protecting our groundwater aquifers
from overexploitation and contamination.
The drinking water supply is based on a decentralised water supply structure, with many small
and large suppliers. The water supply system in Denmark is characterised by having very
simple water treatment, where primarily iron and manganese are separated out in sand filters.
After this simple water treatment, the water can then be distributed to the consumers. This is
possible because the groundwater resource is generally uncontaminated in Denmark due to a
plentiful natural resource with a relatively long transport time from surface to aquifer, and
because of our long tradition for generation of knowledge about the groundwater, as well as
Danish society's general pro-active approach to the protection of the groundwater. For
example, there is a political tradition for regulating the agricultural sector's use of fertiliser and
pesticides. There is also a tradition for granting resources to the public sector, so it can deal
with ownerless contamination that threatens the groundwater resource, and conduct the
investigations and clean-up operations mandatory when existing industries contaminate the
soil and groundwater. The Danish model is builds on a tradition of planning based on the
protection of the resource and the natural environment in collaboration with, and with a great
deal of trust between, the authorities and stakeholders.
The session will provide an insight into why and how such considerable financial resources
(approx. EUR 360 million) have been used in the last 15 years to map the locations of
groundwater aquifers and the transport routes for groundwater formation in Denmark. The
work in implementing the protection of groundwater is carried out by the municipalities, which
are the local groundwater resource authorities. The session will also provide insight into how
work in the last 30 years has focused on mapping, studying and preventing contamination from
industrial point sources that threaten the groundwater.
The session will end by a discussion with the audience putting the benefits and future
challenges into perspective, in relation to mapping and managing the groundwater resource,
and comparing the "Danish model" with other countries' management systems.
Drivers/political incentives for the "Danish model" on groundwater mapping and
protection(put into perspective, focus on legislation + enforcement) (10 min). Martin Skriver,
the Danish Nature Agency.
Overview of the mapping what data are generated, which areas are identified to be
utilised in the following planning and protection process (15 min). Anna Maria Nielsen, the
Danish Nature Agency.
Example of geological groundwater mapping, 3D geological modelling and interpretation of
geophysical data, combination of different modelling techniques (20 min). Flemming
Jrgensen, Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland.
How to use data for response planning and groundwater protection by the players after the
mapping has been executed (15 min). Eskild Lund, Lejre Municipality.
Prioritised efforts for soil contamination- using the groundwater mapping data, (10 min).
Hanne Mller Jensen, Region Zealand.
Discussion questions to/from the audience - polling session during the session (20 min).
Meeting Room 18
SpS 2.2S Towards Urban Land Management 2065 Brownfields the secret weapon
for sustainable cities
Organizers: Maaike Blauw, Linda Maring (Deltares, NL) Hans van Duijne (Deltares/WU, NL)
on behalf of EU FP7 HOMBRE and EU Snowman Balance4P consortium
Brownfield sites are the secret weapon for sustainable European cities. Although these
sites often have contamination problems and require intervention to bring them back into
beneficial use, they are also often in the right place to deliver profitable places for people.
This is in line with the perspective of EU flagship initiative A resource efficient Europe,
where land is seen as a valuable and multi-purpose resource.
In this session, perspectives of land management achieving this goal are presented. In
addition, the EU Urban Agenda will have an important role in achieving the target of
Resource efficient cities. Therefore in this session we will discuss about what research and
developments are needed to enable cities contributing to a resource efficient Europe, which
can be used as input for the Urban Agenda.
Program:
Presentation: Zero Brownfield Perspective: explain framework, how it works and remaining
questions (15min)
Presentation: EU Urban Agenda (15min)
Discussion: Towards Urban Land Management 2065: what research and development is
needed to enable that cities contribute positively to a resource efficient Europe (45 min)
Conclusions and further actions (15 min)
8
Explanation:
Hall number

Meeting room 19
SpS 1B.2Sa Workshop on groundwater contamination from pesticide point sources
Part I
Organizers: Ida Holm Olesen (Region of Southern Denmark, DK), Nina Tuxen (Orbicon A/S,
DK), Poul L. Bjerg (Technical Universty of Denmark, DK)
Moderator: Poul L. Bjerg (Technical Universty of Denmark, DK)
Pesticides are among the most widespread contaminants in the European groundwater.
Recent findings in Denmark indicate that between 20 and 45% of the pesticide findings in
the groundwater can be attributed to point sources. Danish researchers, authorities and
consultants have developed innovative tools for data analysis, catchment scale risk
assessment and remediation.
We believe we are on the right path, but we are very well aware that we have not yet found
the recipe for efficient management of pesticide-point sources. Judged by the limited amount
of literature on pesticide point sources available, it seems that other European countries are in
a similar situation. Therefore, the aim of this workshop is knowledge exchange and mutual
inspiration on the topic of pesticide point sources. Ideally, the session will facilitate forming of
new European partnerships on further research and development among authorities,
consultants and researchers. All participants are invited to contribute to knowledge exchange
by brief presentations and participation in discussions on key issues.
Program:
Introduction to the workshop by Poul L. Bjerg
Ice breaker: the participants introduce themselves to each other
Pesticides in the environment sources, pathways, receptors and environmental
challenges
Poul L. Bjerg (Technical Universty of Denmark, DK)
Challenges related to pesticide point-source contamination of groundwater
Ida Holm Olesen (Region of Southern Denmark, DK)
Finding the significant pesticide-point sources an overview of approaches available
Nina Tuxen (Orbicon A/S, DK)
Short presentations from other European countries
Part II of this workshop is scheduled for Tuesday 9 June 16:00-17:30.
Auditorium 10
SpS 1B.1S Implementation of the EU Water Framework Directive how to manage
contaminated sites threatening surface waters
Organizers: Sandra Roost (Orbicon A/S, DK), Jens Aabling (Danish Environmental Protection
Agency, DK), Nina Tuxen (Orbicon A/S, DK), Trine Korsgaard (Region of Southern Denmark,
DK), Helle Overgaard (The Capital Region of Denmark, DK)
Moderator: John Flyvbjerg
The implementation of the EU Water Framework Directive requires an integrating and holistic
approach to legislation for water bodies with a goal of obtaining good environmental status for
all receiving waters. While the risk from contaminated sites to groundwater has received a
great deal of attention in the past, the risk from contaminated sites to surface waters (streams,
lakes and coastal waters) has not yet been well examined. In Denmark alone there are more
than 30,000 contaminated sites registered many of them located close to surface waters.
However, the hypothesis is that only a minor part of these sites actually pose a real risk
towards surface waters. Thus a robust method is needed to identify the few relevant sites
which still comply with the precautionary principle.
Together with leading experts from universities, consulting companies and regional authorities,
the Danish EPA developed a screening tool to identify contaminated sites that threaten
9
surface waters. The screening system integrates national data of the contaminated sites:
location, distance to surface waters, contamination activity, contaminant area and mass flux
and calculates the mixing in surface waters.
Program:
Experience with the Water Framework Directive and contaminated sites in the
Netherlands
Challenges and experience for the Danish authorities in screening and identifying
contaminated sites threatening surface waters in Denmark
speaker to be defined (Danish Regions, DK)
Time
14.00 14.05
Title
Welcome and programme overview
14.05 14.20
Implementation, experience etc. seen

by the authorities in Denmark
The technical solution and experience
so far in Denmark
Experience from a field project in
Denmark
14.20 14.40
14.40 15.00
15.00 15.20
15.20 15.30
Experience from with two landfills

threatening surface water in Denmark
Wrap-up
Speaker
John Flyvbjerg, The Capital Region
of Denmark
of Denmark
Sandra Roost, Orbicon, Denmark
Jes Rasmussen, Institut for
Bioscience, Aarhus University,
Denmark
Sanne Skov Nielsen, Orbicon,
Denmark
of Denmark
Auditorium 11
ThS 1C.10 Bioremediation of chlorinated solvents in groundwater 2
Chair: Katrin Mackenzie
SILPHES Investigation of chemical treatments for the remediation of recalcitrant
chlorinated solvents: at the roots the development of an innovative in situ eco-friendly
process
Romain Rodrigues, Stphanie Betelu, Frdric Garnier, Stfan Colombano (BRGM, FR),
Antoine Joubert (Serpol,FR), David Cazaux (SOLVAY, FR), Guillaume Masselot (Ademe,
FR), Theodore Tzedakis (Laboratoire de Gnie Chimique, FR), Ioannis Ignatiadis (BRGM,
FR)
Dichloroelimination of polychlorinated alkanes by a Dehalogenimonas-containing
enrichment culture
Ernest Marco-Urrea, Lucia Martn-Gonzlez,Siti Hatijah Mortan (Universitat Autnoma de
Barcelona, ES), Lorenz Adrian (Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ,
DE), Maira Martnez-Alonso, Nuria Gaju, Eloi Parlad (Universitat Autnoma de
Barcelona, ES), Mnica Rosell (Universitat de Barcelona - UB, ES), Teresa Vicent,
Glria Caminal (Universitat Autnoma de Barcelona, ES)
Fully automated enhanced biodegradation of chlorinated ethenes with an on sit anaerobic
bioreactor
Gerard Borggreve, Albert Smits (NTP Enviro Netherlands, NL), Adri Nipshagen
(Bioclear, NL), Rene Tjassens, Michiel Pluim (Municipality The Hague, NL)
Bioremediation of chlorinated solvents under low groundwater temperatures and in low
permeability strata
Phil Dennis, Jeff Roberts, Sandra Dworatzek, Peter Dollar (SiREM, CA)
Bioaugmentation with optimized in-situ culture propagation (BACAd)
Johan Gemoets, Queenie Simons (VITO nv, BE), Baue Boonen (RSK Benelux, DE)
Auditorium 12
ThS 1C.14 Combined treatment technologies 1
Chair: Wouter Gevaerts
Remediation and restoration of the Lac Megantic, Quebec oil train disaster
Todd Schwendeman, Jocelyn Marcotte, Bruce Noble (Aecom, CA)
Combined remedy benefits of integrated physical, chemical and biological treatments on
a 14 million litre fuel spill in a Swedish forest
Kristin Forsberg, Jonny Bergman (RGS 90 Sverige AB, SE), Jeremy Birnstingl
(Regenesis, GB)
DNAPL treated by application of surfactants followed by ISCO
10
Petr Kozubek (Enacon, CZ), Jan Nmeek (ENACON s.r.o. & Technical University
Liberec, CZ), Vladislav Knytl, Eliska Kosinova (DEKONTA a.s., CZ)
Innovative approach to the remediation of contaminated groundwater
Phil Studds (Ramboll UK Ltd, GB)
Coupling groundwater recirculation by GCW and chemical/biological reductive processes
for residual DNAPL source removal: lab investigation and large pilot testing
Marco Petrangeli Papini, Mauro Majone, Lucia Pierro (University of Rome, IT), M.
Sagliaschi, S. Sucato (EDF-Fenice, SpA, IT), Eduard Alesi, Ernst Bartsch
(IEG Technologie GmbH, DE)
Meeting Room 20
ThS 1C.1 Comparison of sustainable remediation approaches
Chair: Ian Ross
Comparison of international approaches to sustainable remediation
Erika Rizzo (University Ca' Foscari Venice, IT), Paul Bardos (r3 environmental technology
ltd, GB), Lisa Pizzol, Andrea Critto, Elisa Giubilato, Antonio Marcomini (University Ca'
Foscari Venice, IT)
Practical application for the SuRF-UK tool kit: sustainability management practices
Paul Bardos (r3 environmental technology ltd, GB), Brian Bone (Bone Environmental Ltd,
GB), Richard Boyle (Homes and Communities Agency, GB), Frank Evans (National Grid
Property, GB), Nicola Harries (CL:AIRE, GB), Trevor Howard (Environment Agency, GB),
Jonathan Smith (Shell Global Solutions (UK) Ltd, GB)
Development of a green remediation tool for sustainability assessment of soil remediation
in Japan
Tetsuo Yasutaka (National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, JP),
Yoshihito Hama, Yasuhisa Tsukada, Kouki Murayama (Tokyo Metropolitan Government,
JP), Yasuhide Furukawa (Takenaka Corporation, JP)
Recent trends in the assessment of sustainable remediation: Does the tail wag the dog?
Gernot Dberl, Dietmar Mller-Grabherr (Environment Agency Austria, AT)
A multi-criteria method for assessing the sustainability of remediation alternatives
Gitte Lemming Sndergaard (Technical University of Denmark, DK), Morten Bondgaard
(Central Denmark Region, DK), Philip J. Binning (Technical University of Denmark, DK),
Kaspar Ruegg (Region Midtjylland, DK), Anja Melvej, Brge Hvidberg (Central Denmark
Region, DK), Poul L. Bjerg (Technical Universty of Denmark, DK)
Meeting Room 18
ThS 2.3 Redevelopment of brownfields 1
Chair: Tim Groitenhuis
Maximising the value-proposition for soft re-use of brownfields
Paul Bardos (r3 environmental technology ltd, GB), Ian Stephenson (Vertase-FLI, GB),
Pierre Menger (TECNALIA, ES), Victor Beumer (Deltares, NL)
The final countdown - Successful remediation policies leads to the end of the Dutch Soil
Protection Act
Michiel Gadella (Ministry of Infrastructure and the Environment, NL)
Urban development on contaminated sites - collaboration between the municipalities and
the Capital Region of Denmark
Hanne Joergensen, Maria Hag (Capital Region of Denmark, DK), Annette Gundog
Ferslev, Heidi Uttenthal Bay (Region Hovedstaden, DK)
Integrated urban land management: an approach for assisting in sustainable
redevelopment of contaminated brownfield sites in France
Elsa Limasset (BRGM, FR), Agns Laboudigue (Mines ParisTech, FR), Claire Alary (Mines
Douai, FR), Jean-Luc Collet (Collet Architecte, FR), Stphane Fourny (Artelia, FR), Hubert
Lprond, Pascale Michel (Brgm, FR), Thomas Valeyre (Mines Douai, FR)
Soil from construction projects as a resource recycling and sustainable soil
management
Joan Krogh (NIRAS A/S, DK)
11
Explanation:
Hall number

Meeting room 19
SpS 1B.2Sb Workshop on groundwater contamination from pesticide point sources
Part II
Organizers: Ida Holm Olesen (Region of Southern Denmark, DK), Nina Tuxen (Orbicon A/S,
DK), Poul L. Bjerg (Technical Universty of Denmark, DK)
Moderator: Poul L. Bjerg (Technical Universty of Denmark, DK)
Pesticides are among the most widespread contaminants in the European groundwater.
Recent findings in Denmark indicate that between 20 and 45% of the pesticide findings in
the groundwater can be attributed to point sources. Danish researchers, authorities and
consultants have developed innovative tools for data analysis, catchment scale risk
assessment and remediation.
We believe we are on the right path, but we are very well aware that we have not yet found
the recipe for efficient management of pesticide-point sources. Judged by the limited amount
of literature on pesticide point sources available, it seems that other European countries are in
a similar situation. Therefore, the aim of this workshop is knowledge exchange and mutual
inspiration on the topic of pesticide point sources. Ideally, the session will facilitate forming of
new European partnerships on further research and development among authorities,
consultants and researchers. All participants are invited to contribute to knowledge exchange
by brief presentations and participation in discussions on key issues.
Program:
Plenary discussion following the presentations at the end of part I
Remediation technologies for pesticide-point sources
Katerina Tsitonaki (Orbicon A/S, DK)
Group discussion: identification of new tools and management approaches and needs for
development
Plenary discussion and summary of the session, Poul L. Bjerg
Part I of this workshop is scheduled for Tuesday 9 June 14:00-15:30.
Auditorium 10
ThS 1A.2 Molecular monitoring
Chair: Charlotte Riis
Bacterial community structure and biogeochemical activity in an aquifer contaminated
with pesticides
Aourell Mauffret, Nicole Baran, Mickael Charron, Catherine Joulian (Brgm, FR)
Assessment of microbial polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) degradation in a
contaminated aquifer using in situ and laboratory microcosms with 13C-labelled PAHs
Petra Bombach (Isodetect GmbH, DE), Arne Bahr, Carsten Vogt (Helmholtz Centre for
Environmental Research - UFZ, DE), Anko Fischer (Isodetect GmbH, DE)
Microbial passive samplers: how reliable?
Jean-Michel Monier, Cdric Malandain, Celine Baguelin, Olivier Sibourg (ENOVEO, FR)
Microbial responses to biostimulation and bioaugmentation a 2-year long pilot trial to
evaluate molecular sampling techniques
Helena Branzn, Mrta Lndell, Lennart Larsson, Anja Enell (Swedish Geotechnical
Institute, SE)
Integrated characterization of the development in natural attenuation of a PCE plume over
7 years after thermal remediation of the source zone with use of dual stable isotope and
microbial methods
Mette Martina Broholm (Technical University of Denmark, DK), Alice Badin (University of
Neuchatel, CH), Carsten Suhr Jacobsen (Geological Survey of Greenland and Denmark,
DK), Phil Dennis (SiREM, CA), Just Niels (Region of Southern Denmark, DK), Daniel
Hunkeler (University of Neuchatel, CH)
12
Auditorium 11
ThS 1C.20 New remediation technologies 1
Pesticide contaminated groundwater Use of electrochemical oxidation and NF/RO
membranes for energy efficient treatment
Henrik Tkker Madsen, Jens Muff, Erik Sgaard (Aalborg University, DK)
Challenges and hopes for scaling up an electrodialytic remediation method for treating
CCA contaminated soil
Krzysztof Kowalski (Technical University of Denmark, DK), Sanne Skov Nielsen (Orbicon
A/S, DK), Pernille Erland Jensen (Technical University of Denmark, DK), Thomas
Hauerberg Larsen (Orbicon A/S, DK), Mads Terkelsen (Capital Region, DK), Lisbeth
Ottosen (Technical University of Denmark, DK)
Full-scale design and implementation of the STAR technology at a coal tar-impacted site
Gavin Grant, Grant Scholes, David Major (Savron, CA), Len de Vlaming, Marlaina Auger
(Geosyntec Consultants, CA)
The fate of potentially toxic element co-contaminants during smouldering remediation
Andrew Robson, Christine Switzer (University of Strathclyde, GB), David Kosson
(Vanderbilt University, US)
Electrokinetically enhanced remediation An innovative solution for source area
remediation
Evan Cox, James Wang, Neal Durant (Geosyntec Consultants, US), David Reynolds
(Geosyntec Consultants, CA), David Gent (US Army Corps of Engineers ERDC, US)
Meeting Room 20
ThS 1C.2 Integrating sustainable remediation into other policies
Chair: Dominique Darmendrail
The regulatory basis for sustainable remediation practice in the European Union and
United Kingdom
Richard Bewley, Rick Parkman (URS Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited, GB), Paul
Bardos (r3 environmental technology ltd, GB), Marcus van Zutphen (Shell Global Solutions
International B.V., NL), Jonathan Smith (Shell Global Solutions UK Ltd, GB)
Dutch remedial programme is heading for the finish: we're nearly done! or not?
Rachelle Verburg, Hans Slenders (ARCADIS, NL)
Green management of former industrial decantation ponds
Hermine Huot (Laboratoire Sols et Environnement / INRA-Universit de Lorraine, FR),
Patrick Charbonnier (Arcelor Mittal France, LU), Marie-Odile Simonnot (Universit de
Lorraine - CNRS, FR), Jean-Louis Morel (University of Lorraine, FR)
Flanders integrates sustainable soil remediation into other policies
Griet Van Gestel, Johan Ceenaeme, Ellen Luyten, Tim Caers, Bavo Peeters, Nick Bruneel
(OVAM, BE)
Building a network-based expert-stakeholder framework for sustainable remediation
Filip Alexandrescu, Erika Rizzo, Lisa Pizzol, Andrea Critto (University Ca' Foscari, IT)
Meeting Room 18
ThS 2.4 Redevelopment of brownfields 2
Chair: Stefan Bartke
Towards 3D geochemistry of urban subsoil: historical and material inputs
Ccile Le Guern, Vivien Baudouin, Pierre Conil (BRGM, FR)
What can you do for one and a half million urban redevelopment through
implementation of new technology
Dennis Scheper, Gerard Borggreve, Albert Smits (NTP Enviro Netherlands, NL), Adri
Nipshagen, Dick Specht (Bioclear, NL), Luuk Wallinga (RUD Drenthe, NL)
Teterboro Landing Brownfields Redevelopment - Worlds Largest In Situ
Thermal Desorption Site
John Bierschenk, Gorm Heron, Ken Parker, Steffen Griepke Nielsen
(TerraTherm, Inc., US)
BALANCE 4P - A holistic approach for sustainable brownfield regeneration
Jenny Norrman (Chalmers University of Technology, SE), Linda Maring (Deltares, NL),
Fransje Hooimeijer (TUD, NL), Steven Broekx (Vito NV, BE), Yevheniya Volchko
(Chalmers University of Technology, SE)
Discussion on brownfields redevelopment
13
Explanation:
Hall number
Wednesday 10 June 09:00-10:30

Meeting Room 19
ThS 1A.3 Novel monitoring approaches 1
Chair: Tim Grotenhuis
Quantification of the groundwater-borne contaminant mass discharge to a stream using
Point-Velocity Probes (PVP)
Vinni K. Rnde, Ursula McKnight, Anne T. Sonne (Technical University of Denmark, DK),
John Frederick Devlin (University of Kansas, US), Poul L. Bjerg (Technical Universty of
Denmark, DK)
A new, fast, clean and easy way to predict organic contaminant availability using
thermodesorption gas chromatography mass spectrometry/flame ionization (Td-GCMS/FID)
Coralie Biache (LIEC UMR 7360 CNRS UL, FR), Catherine Lorgeoux (CNRS / Universit
de Lorraine, FR), Alain Saada, Stfan Colombano (Brgm, FR), Pierre Faure
(CNRS/Universit de Lorraine, FR)
CPT-based hydraulic profiling tool with extended capabilities in highly permeable media
Eugen Martac, Axel Oppermann (Fugro Consult GmbH, DE)
Development of an innovative technique for soil water sampling in unsaturated zones with
highly variable water content
Axel Fischer, Jens Fahl (TU Dresden, DE)
Methodology for fast and reliable investigation and characterization of contaminated sites
Jrgen Mlgaard Christensen, Per Reimann (DGE Milj og Ingenirfirma, DK)
Auditorium 10
ThS 1B.6 Environmental Risk Assessment - soil and groundwater 1
Chair: Katalin Gruiz
Approach to cumulative risk assessment of contaminated sites in Flanders
Christa Cornelis, Lieve Geerts (VITO, BE), Griet Van Gestel (OVAM Public Waste Agency
of Flanders, BE)
A recommended approach to apply bioavailability methods in a framework for improved
ecological risk assessments of PAH contaminated soils
Dan Berggren Kleja, Anja Enell, Ann-Sofie Allard (Swedish Environmental Research
Institute, SE), Staffan Lundstedt (Ume University, SE), Gerard Cornelissen, Hans Peter
Arp (Norwegian Geotechnical Institute, NO)
Protocols for ecological risk assessment
Marlea Wagelmans (Bioclear, NL)
Risk assessment of urban gardening in Copenhagen
Stefan Trapp (DTU, DK)
Pyrite cinder waste deposition Scherpekamp
Joop Verhagen, Denny Schanze (ARCADIS Nederland BV, NL)
14
Auditorium 11
ThS 1C.16 In Situ Chemical Oxidation (ISCO) 1
Chair: Renato Baciocchi
Destruction of perflourooctaine sulfonate (PFOS) and perflouroctanoic acid (PFOA) using
activated persulfate
Josephine Molin (PeroxyChem Environmental Technologies, US), Michael Mueller
(PeroxyChem Environmental Technologies, AT), Brant Smith, Daniel Leigh (PeroxyChem
Environmental Technologies, US)
Sustained-release MultiOx technology: reactive synergies resulting from permanganate in
combination with persulfate for passive contaminant treatment
Lorenzo Sacchetti (Carus Europe, ES), Pamela Dugan (Carus Corporation, US)
Use of different kinds of persulfate activation and Fenton Reagent for the removal of
PFOA and PFOS from contaminated water
Fernando Pardo, Virginia Huerta, Esperanza Montero, Sergio Rodrguez, Aurora Santos,
Arturo Romero (University Complutense of Madrid, ES)
Implementing in-situ chemical oxidation on an industrial EX-rated site
Arno Kooistra, Art Lobs (Verhoeve Milieu & Water, NL), Tim De Bouw (RSK Benelux, BE),
Richard Lookman (Verhoeve Groep Belgium bvba, BE)
Remediation of a pentachlorophenol contamination underneath a residential area
Tessa Pancras, Jurgen van der Wal, Joop Verhagen (ARCADIS Nederland B.V., NL)
Auditorium 12
SpS 1D.1S Contaminated sites evolution from the fumbling start to state of the art
Organizers: Lone Tolstrup Karlby, Tage Vikjr Bote (Cowi, DK), Helle Okholm (Danish
Environmental Protection Agency, DK), Christian Andersen (Danish Regions, DK), Torben
Hjbjerg Jrgensen (Cowi,DK), Nina Tuxen (Orbicon A/S, DK), Ninna Dahl Ravnsbk (Cowi,
DK)
Moderators: Tage Vikjr Bote & Lone Tolstrup Karlby (COWI, DK)
The legislators (Danish Environmental Protection Agency), the regulators (the Regional
governments) and the performing part (consultants and contractors) in Danish soil and
groundwater issues have a very unique working environment based on a strong scientific
knowledge on all levels and very competent performers in the field. In the last three decades,
Denmark has built a unique model for dealing with soil and groundwater contamination. The
aim of the session is to inspire others by sharing the Danish approach of how to handle
contaminated sites on all levels; our good and bad experiences on this topic, and with this,
hopefully creating international working relations where we all share, learn and take home the
best from each others practices.
Program:
Danish legislation of contaminated sites. The Legislation behind it all and how it has
developed over the last 30 years.
Helle Okholm/Ole Kiilerich (Danish Environmental Protection Agency, DK)
How do the Danish Regions prioritize, investigate and remediate contaminated sites
Christian Andersen (Danish Regions, Environment and Resource)
Investigation and Remediation Methods, developments and state of the art
Torben Hjbjerg Jrgensen (COWI, DK)
KRIPP: Concept for Risk based ranking and prioritization of contaminated sites.
Nina Tuxen (Orbicon, DK)
Brownfield Regeneration. How the Danish approach influences development of
contaminated sites as old industrial areas, harbors and old marshalling yards and prevents
that regeneration activities causes contamination to spread.
Ninna Dahl Ravnsbk (COWI, DK)
Meeting Room 20
ThS 1C.3 Decentralization and harmonization
Chair: Stefan Bartke
Public funding scheme for remediation projects in Austria
Regine Patek (KPC, AT)
Harmonisation bottom-up or top-down? a national remediation framework for Australia
Bruce Kennedy, Kerry Scott (CRC Care, Univ. of South Australia, AU), Ravi Naidu (CRC
Care and CERAR, Univ. of South Australia, AU)
15
Progress towards an ISO document on sustainable remediation

C. Paul Nathanail (University of Nottingham, GB)
Policy goals and experience of making of a national strategy for the remediation of
contaminated soil in Finland
Sarianne Tikkanen (Finnish Environment Institute, FI), Anna-Maija Pajukallio (Ministry of
the Environment, FI), Outi Pyy (Finnish Environment Institute, FI)
Lake Boyuk Shor: environmental engineering and eco-hydrology as fast track to
engineering solutions for lake restoration in Azerbaijan
Bjent Enden (Witteveen+Bos, NL)
Meeting Room 18
ThS 2.5 Reuse of contaminated soil and sediments 1
Chair: Toon Segeren
Urban geochemical backgrounds for excavated soil reuse
Celine Blanc, Jean-Francois Brunet, Frdric Guiet, Philippe Herniot, Aurelien Leynet
(BRGM, FR), Hlne Roussel (ADEME, FR), Maxime Jarzabek (BRGM, FR)
Contaminated sludge being used/reused in foundations of new projects
Rob Wortelboer (TenCate Geosynthetics, NL)
Flemish policy on the use of excavated soil
Dirk Dedecker, Filip De Naeyer, Eddy Van Dyck (Public Waste Agency of Flanders, BE)
LORVER: a production chain of biomass for industrial purposes from former sites and
abandoned materials
Marie-Odile Simonnot (Universit de Lorraine - CNRS, FR), Sophie Guimont, Lucas
Gossiaux (Valterra Dpollution Rhabilitation, FR), Jean-Louis Morel (University of
Lorraine, FR)
Geochemical fractionation and phytoavailability of trace elements in an estuarine soil
impacted by historic mine waste contamination
Eleanor van Veen, John Coggan (University of Exeter, GB)
16
Explanation:
Hall number

Meeting Room 19
ThS 1A.4 Novel monitoring approaches 2
Chair: Peter Grathwohl
Use of next-generation characterization tools and three-dimensional visualization to
enhance remedy performance
Ian Ross (ARCADIS, GB), Mark Webb (ARCADIS EC Harris, GB)
3D-Modelling of the salt-/fresh water interface in coastal aquifers of Lower Saxony
(Germany) based on airborne electromagnetic measurements (HEM)
Nico Deus (State Authority for Mining, Energy and Geology, DE), Jrg Elbracht (LBEG
Hannover, DE), Bernhard Siemon (Federal Institute for Geosciences and Natural
Resources, DE)
Innovative Field Investigations in Limestone using a FACT-FLUTe
Klaus Mosthaf (DTU Environment, DK), Mie B. Srensen (Capital Region of Denmark,
DK), Mette Martina Broholm (Technical University of Denmark, DK), Henriette KerrnJespersen (Capital Region of Denmark, DK), Philip J. Binning (Technical University of
Denmark, DK)
The Delft case improved water and soil management through smart monitoring
Rina Clemens (Witteveen+Bos, NL), Charon Walet (Municipality of Delft, NL), Hans
Korving (Delft University of Technology, NL)
Evidence of in situ biodegradation of ethyl tert-butyl ether (ETBE) in a fuel-contaminated
aquifer using stable isotope tools
Petra Bombach (Isodetect GmbH, DE), Norbert Ngele (Kuvier the Biotech Company S.L.,
ES), Mnica Rosell (Universitat de Barcelona - UB, ES), Hans Hermann Richnow
(Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ, DE), Anko Fischer (Isodetect
GmbH, DE)
Auditorium 10
ThS 1B.7 Environmental Risk Assessment - soil and groundwater 2
Chair: Poul Bjerg
Environmental risk assessment and remediation options for contaminated river sediments
Michael Madliger, David Trudel, Christian Niederer (BMG Engineering AG, CH)
Environmental risk assessment at large infrastructure projects: emissions from the use of
explosives and construction chemicals
Christian Niederer, Michael Madliger, Michael Aeschbacher (BMG Engineering AG, CH)
Arsenic, antimony and selenium in urban soils: potential risks for human health in urban
gardening
Miguel Izquierdo, Eduardo De Miguel, Amaia Gomez, Juan Mingot (Universidad
Politecnica de Madrid, ES)
Gardening and soil contamination: finding a way to produce healthy home-grown food
Griet Van Gestel, Nele Bal, Johan Ceenaeme (OVAM, BE), Karen Van Campenhout
(LNE Environment, BE) Christa Cornelis (VITO, BE), Maja Mampaey (LNE Environment,
BE)
Residential location contaminated with cumene: building team construction results in a
successful (in-situ) remediation
Peter Ramakers (Provincie Brabant, NL), Joost van Schijndel (Tauw, NL), Gerard
Borggreve (NTP Enviro Netherlands, NL)
17
Auditorium 11
ThS 1C.11 Bioremediation of coal tar and fuels
Chair: Nicola Harries
Simulation of bioremediation options by microbial degradation of aged PAH contamination
in soils
Arno Rein (Technische Universitt Mnchen - TUM, DE), Stefan Trapp (Technical
University of Denmark, DK), Iris K. U. Adam, Anja Miltner (Helmholtz-Centre for
Environmental Research UFZ, DE), Kilian Smith (Korean Institute of Science and
Technology Europe, DE), Geoffrey Marchal (Technical University of Denmark, DK), Ulrich
Gosewinkel (Aarhus University, DK), Philipp Mayer (Technical University of Denmark,
DK), Matthias Kstner (Helmholtz-Centre for Environmental Research UFZ, DE)
Microbial key players during in-situ and in-vitro biostimulation of an ETBE polluted aquifer
Marc Vias, Miriam Guivernau (Institute of Agrifood Research and Technology (IRTA),
ES), Isabel Mori (Invesoil Consultores Medioambientales S.L., ES), Fernando Garca
(Compaa Logstica de Hidrocarburos, ES), Joaquim Vila (University of Barcelona, ES),
Francesc X. Prenafeta-Bold (Institute of Agrifood Research and Technology - IRTA, ES)
Quinones increase availability of poorly soluble geogenic terminal electron acceptors for
anaerobic hydrocarbon degradation
Kerstin E. Scherr, Amandine de Schaetzen, Marion Hasinger-Sumetzberger, Diana
Backes, Gertrud Kadlec (University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, AT),
Andreas Loibner (BOKU, AT), Manfred Nahold (GUT Gruppe Umwelt + Technik GmbH,
AT)
Inoculated bioreactor for MTBE/TBA removal from water lab & pilot tests
Leen Bastiaens, Queenie Simons, Hans Sterckx, Guy Borgmans, Johan Gemoets (VITO
nv, BE)
Anaerobic bio-oxidation: a sustainable remedial technology for the treatment of BTEX
Karen Van Geert, Jeroen Verhack, Wouter Gevaerts, Koen Enkels, Karolien Claeys,
Gerlinde De Moor (ARCADIS Belgium, BE)
Auditorium 12
ThS 1C.15 Combined treatment technologies 2
Chair: Nina Tuxen
Cooperation of iron reducing bacteria and iron particles in remediation of chlorinated
ethylenes
Lenka Honetschlgerov, Petra Janoukovcov (Institute of chemical technology Prague,
CZ)
Lecithin and ferrous iron as electron donors for enhanced reduction dechlorination (ERD)
and in situ chemical reduction (ISCR)
Alan Seech (PeroxyChem Environmental Technologies, US), Michael Mueller
(PeroxyChem Environmental Technologies, AT), Daniel Leigh (PeroxyChem
Environmental Technologies, US)
Accelerating trichloroethylene remediation in saprolite and fractured crystalline bedrock
by in-situ chemical oxidation and in-situ chemical reduction - a successful case study of
combined remedies at a challenging site
George Y. Maalouf (Rogers & Callcott Environmental, US)
Petroleum hydrocarbon mass removal using reagent based enhanced desorption
combined with physical recovery techniques
Jeremy Birnstingl (Regenesis, GB), Alberto Leombruni (Regenesis Ltd, IT), Ben Mork
(Regenesis, US), Gareth Leonard (Regenesis, GB)
Combined nano-biotechnology for in-situ remediation of mixed contamination of
groundwater by hexavalent chromium and chlorinated solvents
Jan Nmeek, Petr Pokorn (ENACON s.r.o., CZ), Ondej Lhotsk (Dekonta & Charles
University, CZ), Petra Najmanov, Vladislav Knytl (DEKONTA a.s., CZ), Jana Steinov,
Miroslav ernk (Technical University of Liberec, CZ), Tom Cajthaml (Institute of
Microbiology of the AS CR & Charles University, CZ)
18
Meeting Room 20
SpS 1C.5S Contaminated site remediation practical decision making
Organizer: John Hunt (Engineering Co, AU)
This session focuses on how to make decisions regarding the remedial strategy for
contaminated sites and associated information requirements above and beyond the
assessment data required to implement a management or active remediation strategy.
Australia has been developing national guidance on the remediation of contaminated sites;
this involves consideration of how other countries approach the problem, and how concepts
such as risk-based land management and sustainable remediation should be included. The
concepts presented in this session should be of interest to many countries, particularly those
that are grappling with how to achieve the greatest return from the investment in remediation
of contaminated sites.
The session includes speakers who are highly experienced in remediating contaminated sites
and have a good understanding of international approaches being applied, and the thinking
that underlies good decision making related to contaminated sites.
Program:
Setting the scene: commentary on the international approaches and new developments
in remediation strategy
Hans Slenders (ARCADIS, NL)
Determining the most appropriate remediation strategy for a contaminated site
Peter Nadebaum (GHD Pty Ltd, AU)
Designing a remediation system the solution is only as good as the problem definition
John Hunt (Engineering Co, AU), Ian Brookman (Thiess Services Pty Ltd, AU)
Remediation Implementation - Decisions Made When Circumstances Change,
David Tully (Coffey, AU)
Meeting Room 18
ThS 2.6 Reuse of contaminated soil and sediments 2
Chair: Renato Baciocchi
Using innovative geotextile constructions as an in-situ bioremediation technique to
remediate contaminated sediments and to improve water quality of shallow lakes
Chiel Lauwerijssen (Tauw Group, NL)
Implementation of a Transit Hub Site (THS) for excavated soils the Israeli experience
Tomer Ash (LDD Advanced Technologies, IL), Meir Tapiero (BioSoil - Israel, IL), Raphi
Mandelbaum (LDD Advanced Technologies, IL)
Sustainable use of excavated soil in the Capital Region of Copenhagen - new initiatives
Jens Lind Gregersen (Region Hovedstaden / Capital Region of Denmark, DK), Arne
Rokkjr (Capital Region of Denmark, DK)
Soil improvement with biochar - microcosms for characterization of the effects of biochar
on acidic sandy soil
Mnika Molnr, Viktoria Feigl, va Ujaczki, Orsolya Klebercz, Mria Tolner, Emese
Vaszita, Katalin Gruiz (Budapest University of Technology and Economics, HU)
The circular economy maximising the reuse of soils making it happen
Claire Dickinson, Hilary Allen (Aecom, GB)
19
Explanation:
Hall number

Meeting Room 19
SpS 1A.7S US EPA Session 1: Best Practices for Site Characterization
Organizers: Carlos S. Pachon and Stephen A. Dyment (United States Environmental
Protection Agency)
A clear theme arising from EPAs optimization studies is the need for more accurate
characterization of site conditions to ensure remedy efficiency and success. The goal of the
session is to share our lessons learned, discuss opportunities and challenges with
professionals in the audience and to gain insights from the experiences of others.
This session will present an overview of efforts to optimize site characterization, including
leveraging the use of existing site data, the importance and application of a life-cycle
Conceptual Site Model (CSM), the use of high resolution site characterization techniques to
improve the design and implementation of groundwater remedies, the use of incremental
sampling methodologies to improve the representativeness of characterization of soils, and the
use of newer visualization tools to better plan and monitor site cleanup.
Auditorium 10
SpS 1B.5S Vapor intrusion - state of the art
Organizers: Tage V. Bote (COWI, DK), Per Loll (DMR, DK), Mads Georg Mller (Orbicon A/S,
DK), Bjarke N. Hoffmark (COWI, DK)
Moderators: Per Loll (DMR, DK), Tage Vikjr Bote (COWI, DK), Bjarke N. Hoffmark (COWI,
DK)
Since the mid-1990s, vapor intrusion has been a major issue in Denmark, and today vapor
intrusion is a significant part of handle contaminated sites. Over the last two decades,
investigation techniques and approaches have been developed to locate and determine the
amount of vapor intrusion. These initiatives have provided us with highly specialized knowledge
about the mechanisms controlling the vapor intrusion. Remediation techniques have been
developed and refined and now offer greater security against vapor intrusion.
The aim of the session is to share our knowledge about vapor intrusion including investigation
and remediation techniques. The acknowledgement of vapor intrusion varies from country to
country due to political and cultural differences. However, differences in the ways vapor
intrusion is handled are also due to differences in building constructions and climate factors
that are of great importance to processes that control vapor intrusion. Another aim of the
session is therefore to discuss this diversity in order to give both participants and speakers a
better understanding of the similarities and differences and the extent to which we can apply
knowledge and methods from one country/region to another.
Program:
State-of-the-art studies of vapor intrusions and migration pathways
Per Loll (DMR, DK)
Remediation techniques using passive venting systems
Mads Georg Mller (Orbicon, DK)
Remediation using Hybrid venting system based upon solar and wind power
Bjarke N. Hoffmark (COWI A/S, DK)
Monitoring strategy
Tage V. Bote (COWI, DK)
Discussion
Participants ans speakers
20
Auditorium 11
ThS 1C.17 In Situ Chemical Oxidation (ISCO) 2
Chair: Mette Christophersen
Combined Fenton-like oxidation and CO2 sparging for the treatment of
groundwater contaminated by organic compounds
Daniela Zingaretti, Iason Verginelli, Renato Baciocchi (University of Rome Tor Vergata, IT)
Use of different kinds of persulfate activation with iron for the remediation of a
PAH- contaminated soil
Fernando Pardo (Universidad Complutense de Madrid, ES), Marina Peluffo (CINDEFI.
AR), Aurora Santos, Arturo Romero (University Complutense of Madrid, ES)
The advantage of bench scale treatability studies as a decision making tool for a full
scale ISCO approach in an innovative tender procedure
Albert Smits, Gerard Borggreve, Dennis Scheper (NTP Enviro, NL), Mart Jansen (Dutch
Rail Soil Remediation Foundation, NL), Michael Mueller (PeroxyChem Environmental
Technologies, AT)
Barium ferrates for in-situ chemical oxidation of BTEX contaminants
Norbert Klaas, Christine Herrmann, Karin Hauff (University of Stuttgart, DE)
In-situ sodium persulfate oxidation of benzene under ambient (thermal) activation
Ian Ross (ARCADIS, GB)
Auditorium 12
SpS 1D.5S From source tracing to remediation and dealing with contamination risk
Organizers: James Taylor (ALS, UK), Douglas Baxter (ALS Scandinavia), Palle Ejlskov ( Ejlskov
A/S, DK), Kristian Bitsch (Ramboll, DK)
Moderator: Nora B. Sutton
Program:
Whos poo is this? Making the most of instant bacteria confirmations
James Taylor (ALS, UK)
Pollution source tracing using isotope ratios
Douglas Baxter (ALS Scandinavia)
Turnkey solutions with Trap & Treat in situ remediation technologies
Palle Ejlskov ( Ejlskov A/S, DK)
Water supply in urban areas with many well-known pollution sites two cases in the
Copenhagen area
Kristian Bitsch (Ramboll, DK)
Questions and discussion
Meeting Room 20
SpS 1C.4S Sustainable Remediation avoiding greenwash by striving to demonstrate
better results
Organizers: Claudio Albano (CH2MHILL & SuRF Italy & International SuRF Network)
Laurent Bakker (TAUW & NICOLE SRWG)
Moderators: Jonathan Smith (Shell Global Solutions & SuRF UK), Dominique Darmendrail
(COMMON FORUM on Contaminated Land in Europe)
In London 2008 Soil and Groundwater Technology Association (SAGTA) in association with
Network for Industrially Contaminated Land in Europe (NICOLE) held the first European
conference raising the issue of sustainability in land remediation. Concurrently Sustainable
Remediation Forum-UK (SuRF-UK) along with a NICOLE Working Group on Sustainable
Remediation were established providing new forums to exchange information and innovating
concepts. Now there are Sustainable Remediation Fora all around the world and international
knowledge exchange is well established. Over the years these networks have strived to
present case studies proving the advantages of sustainable remediation but have noticed many
case studies of greenwash instead.
Decision making should be kept simple when possible and more complex if appropriate. We
have noticed a trend that all kinds of complex tools and methodologies are now being used
although the reasoning to choose the most suitable sustainable solution is often obvious,
primarily when proper stakeholder engagement is in place. The session updates on activities
and learnings, providing space for discussion and networking.
21
1. Introduction to the session (by the moderators; 5 min)
2. Sustainable remediation, update on results and activities (15 min each including
Questions & Answers)
International cooperation (Nicola Harries; CL:AIRE, SuRF International)
US EPA Experiences Building Sustainability into Contaminated Site Programs (Carlos
Pachon; US EPA)
The NICOLE roadmap and European experiences (Laurent Bakker, TAUW & NICOLE)
Key findings of the 3rd Sustainable Remediation Conference at Ferrara, September 2014
(Claudio Albano, CH2MHILL, SuRF Italy)
3. Discussion: International Fora and Programmes Strengths and Weaknesses (20 min)
Questions to debate might include:
Are there learnings from an international exchange?
Where are Opportunities and Threats to national SuRF chapters?
Have you ever seen a case study providing records and demonstrating all three pillars of
sustainability?
Are we heading in the right direction, do we oversee things?
4. Summary and next activities
Meeting Room 18
ThS 2.7 Reusing materials from mining activities and landfills
Chair: Jens Laugesen
Predicting plant metal bioaccessibility in soils contaminated by historic mining
Eleanor van Veen, Bernd Lottermoser (University of Exeter, GB)
Recycling nickel from hyperaccumulator plants at the pilot scale
Marie-Odile Simonnot (Universit de Lorraine - CNRS, FR), Vivian Houzelot, Xin Zhang
(LRGP (CNRS - Universit de Lorraine), FR), Florent Ferrari, Baptiste Laubie, MarieNolle Pons (Universit de Lorraine - CNRS, FR), Edouard Plasari (LRGP (CNRS Universit de Lorraine), FR), Aida Bani (Agricultural University of Tirana, AL), Jean-Louis
Morel, Guillaume Echevarria (Universit de Lorraine, FR)
Insight into a 20 ha multi-contaminated brownfield megasite: an environmental forensics
approach
Jos Luis Rodrguez Gallego, Eduardo Rodrguez-Valds, Noemi Esquinas, Alicia
Fernndez-Braa, Nora Matanzas, Carlos Boente, Elas Afif (University of Oviedo, ES)
Utilization of methane gas for electricity production on minor parts of closed landfills
Tommy Bg Nielsen, Stella Agger, Henrik Jannerup (Region Zealand, DK)
Understanding Solid-gaseous Phase Transition of Elemental Contaminants during the
Gasification of Biomass Harvested from Contaminated Land
Ying Jiang, Phil Longhurst (Cranfield University, GB)
22
Explanation:
Hall number

Meeting Room 19
ThS 1A.6 Adaptive monitoring based on real time data, model driven
Chair: Katalin Gruiz
MIP-IN device for combined detection of pollutants and injection of reagents
Leen Bastiaens (VITO NV, BE), Bjorn Anderson (Ejlskov, DK), Jan Kukacka (Dekonta,
CZ), Jan De Vos (ABO, BE), Lars Nebel, Palle Ejlskov (Ejlskov, DK)
Evolution of a site conceptual model using multimedia CSIA to supplement
traditional techniques
Devon Rowe, Carol Serlin, Seema Turner, Tom Chandler, Farshad Razmdjoo, Steve
Luis (ENVIRON, US)
Model of the influence of meanders and time varying stream levels on
groundwater discharge to streams
Nicola Balbarini, Ellen Nicolajsen, Vinni K. Rnde, Poul L. Bjerg, Philip J. Binning
(Technical University of Denmark, DK)
Integrated characterization of sediment quality in catchments/rivers
Peter Grathwohl (University of Tbingen, DE), Hermann Rgner, Marc Schwientek
(WESS c/o University of Tbingen, DE), Michael Rode (Helmholtz Centre for
Environmental Research UFZ, DE)
Delineation of contaminant plumes using Low-Level MIHPT (LL-MIHPT)
Malene Toernqvist Front, Charlotte Riis, Anders Christensen (NIRAS A/S, DK), Nancy
Hamburger, Peder Johansen (The Capital Region of Denmark), Lone Tolstrup Karlby
(COWI)
Auditorium 10
ThS 1B.8 Indoor air pollution from soil and groundwater
Chair: Jena Laugesen
Probabilistic risk assessment for six vapour intrusion algorithms
Jeroen Provoost (FI), Jan Bronders, Ilse Van Keer (Vito NV, BE)
Origin of hydrocarbons in indoor air
Dorte Harrekilde (Ramboll, DK), Niels Just (The Region of Southern Denmark, DK)
New concepts in vapour intrusion
Jeroen Provoost (FI)
Sewer systems as a major intrusion pathway for VOCs to indoor air
Karin Birn Nielsen, Brge Hvidberg (Central Denmark Region, DK)
Blower door test to examine if VOC contamination in indoor air is caused by
internal source or by sub-slab source
Boerge Hvidberg, Karin Birn Nielsen (Central Denmark Region, DK)
Auditorium 11
ThS 1C.22 Zero valent iron
Chair: Marco Petrangeli Papini
Implementation of zerovalent iron for source zone treatment via soil mixing
Hilde Decuyper (A+E Consult bvba, BE), Nele Vermeiren (Smet F&C, BE), Johan
Gemoets, Richard Lookman, Ilse Van Keer, Leen Bastiaens (VITO NV, BE)
In situ remediation of chlorinated solvents using ZVI-clay soil mixing for the first time in
Sweden
Nicklas Larsson (NIRAS, SE), Anders Christensen (NIRAS, DK), Ulf Winnberg
(Geological Survey of Sweden, SE), Henrik E. Steffensen (NIRAS, DK)
Batchtests and field application of in situ remediation of groundwater contaminated with
chlorinated solvents by direct injection of nanoscale Zero Valent Iron on three locations
in Denmark
Anne Gammeltoft Hindrichsen, John Ulrik Bastrup (Geo, DK)
DNAPL source zone treatment with ZVI soil mixing
Denny Schanze (ARCADIS Nederland BV, NL)
23
Optimizing the properties of nanofluids for the efficient NAPL remediation in porous media
Christos Tsakiroglou, Katerina Terzi, Alexandra Sikinioti-Lock, Kata Hajdu, Christos
Aggelopoulos (Foundation for Research and Technology Hellas, GR)
Auditorium 12
ThS 1C.19 Miscellaneous remediation topics 2
Chair: Wouter Gevaerts
Composting for ex situ/on site decontamination of PAHs contaminated soils
Ondej Lhotsk (Dekonta & Charles University, CZ), Stefano Covino (Academy of
Sciences of the Czech Republic, CZ), Jana Janochov (Institute of Microbiology of the AS
CR, CZ), Monika Stavlov (Aecom CZ, CZ), Petra Najmanov (DEKONTA, a.s., CZ),
Tom Cajthaml (Institute of Microbiology of the AS CR & Charles University, CZ)
Environmental dredging of a chromium contaminated fjord in Valdemarsvik, Sweden
Stany Pensaert (DEC, BE)
Acidic soil washing as a remediation method for Cu polluted soil: optimization of the
leaching process and assessment of the solid residues
Karin Karlfeldt Fedje, Ann-Margret Strmvall (Chalmers University of Technology, SE)
Supercritical extraction coupled with ultrasounds for removal of pesticides from soil
Teresa Castelo-Grande (FEUP, PT)
High Resolution Groundwater Flow diagnostic system for optimization of in-situ site
remediation and environmental protection
Petr Kvapil, Martin Prochzka, Tom Lederer (AQUATEST a.s., CZ)
Meeting Room 20
ThS 1D.3 Risk mitigation and intervention measures
Chair: Ruud Cino
Can we trust in Managed Aquifer Recharge (MAR) to deal with emerging contaminants
present in reclaimed water?
Marta Hernndez Garca (CETAQUA, ES), Oriol Gibert (Universitat Politcnica de
Catalunya, ES), Xavier Bernat (CETaqua, ES), Karsten Ndler, Tobias Licha (Geoscience
Centre of the University of Gttingen, DE)
Biological treatment of micropollutants in drinking water resources
Janneke Wittebol, Marlea Wagelmans (Bioclear, NL)
How to get a camel to go through the eye of a needle: Successful site remediation of a
former explosives production site: safe housing, working and drinking water production on
a long-term basis
Christian Weingran (HIM GmbH, DE), H. Georg Meiners (ahu AG
WasserBodenGeomatik, DE)
PFCs in the United States: historical use, environmental occurrence, policy, and
regulation
Neal Durant (Geosyntec Consultants, US), Ramona Darlington (Battelle Memorial
Institute, US)
Bottom-up regional initiatives to tighten up the generic pesticides rules and regulations in
the Netherlands
Cors van den Brink (Royal HaskoningDHV, NL)
Meeting Room 18
ThS 3.5 Ecosystems services and combined approaches
Chair: Dominique Darmendrail
Challenges and possibilites in the Danish groundwater sector
Rolf Johnsen (Central Denmark Region, DK)
Ecosystem services of the groundwater and the subsurface; filling the knowledge gap
Johannes P.A. Lijzen (National Institute of Public Health and the Environment, NL),
Sophie Vermooten (Deltares, NL), Hans Peter Broers (TNO, NL), Suzanne van der
Meulen (Deltares, NL), Michiel Rutgers (RIVM, NL)
Soil and groundwater related ecosystem services in the Atlas Natural Capital
Suzanne van der Meulen (Deltares, NL), Kees Hendriks (Alterra, Wageningen University
and Research Centre, NL), Michiel Rutgers (RIVM, NL)
Application of Life Cycle Assessment into development of urban projects
Jordi Boronat (MediTerra, ES), Geertrui Louwagie (European Environment Agency, DK),
Carmen Hidalgo (leitat, ES), Paul Nathanail (Land Quality Management Ltd, GB), Karen
Van Geert (ARCADIS Belgium, BE), Nila Nielsen (MediTerra, ES)
Management of the subsurface: an EIA for a National spatial plan for the subsurface
Justine Oomes (Ministry of Infrastructure and Environment, NL), Matthijs Nijboer (Tauw
bv, NL), Ivo van der Sommen, Anita Bijvoet (Ministry of Infrastructure and Environment, NL)
24
Explanation:
Hall number
Thursday 11 June 09:00-10:30

Meeting Room 19
ThS 4.1 Adaptive water quantity and quality management in urban areas
Chair: Hans van Duijne
Impacts from climate changes on contaminated soil and ground water are we
sufficiently aware of them?
Stella Agger, Tommy Bg Nielsen, Hanne Mller Jensen (Region Zealand, DK)
The quality of stormwater runoff leaving filter soil
Karin Cederkvist, Peter E. Holm, Marina B. Jensen (University of Copenhagen, DK)
Infiltration of rainwater in urban areas as a climate change adaptation strategy
Charlotte Schow Jensen, N.H.M. Goring (Rambll, DK)
The risk of mobilizing contaminants from soil when infiltrating rain water.
Britt Boye Thrane (Rambll, DK)
Reactive transport impacts on recovered water quality for a field MPPW-ASR system in a
geochemically heterogeneous coastal aquifer
Koen Zuurbier, Niels Hartog, Pieter Niels Stuyfzand (KWR Watercycle Research Institute,
NL)
Auditorium 10
SpS 1B.3S After 25 years of contaminated land-related human exposure models:
READY, STEADY, GO?
Organizers: Frank Swartjes (National Institute of Public Health and the Environment, NL),
Yvonne Ohlsson (Swedish Geotechnical Institute, SE), Renato Baciocchi, Iason Verginelli
(University of Rome Tor Vergata, IT), Stefan Trapp (Technical University of Denmark, DK),
Roberto Pecoraro (Versalis, IT), Jeroen Provoost (FI)
Moderator: Frank Swartjes (National Institute of Public Health and the Environment, NL)
25 Years ago the first generation of human exposure models was published. Today, human
exposure models are widely available and worldwide used on a large scale, often without
much review or criticism. In many contaminated soil and groundwater appraisals, however,
human exposure models contribute significantly to good risk assessment and risk
management practices. More than that, human exposure models often are considered as the
core tool in risk assessment and risk management of contaminated soil and groundwater.
Therefore, the question is warranted after 25 years if human exposure models are finished or
if serious knowledge gaps remain. Moreover, an interesting question is how human exposure
models are used in practical applications.
Program:
Setting the scene
Frank Swartjes (National Institute of Public Health and the Environment, NL)
Oral bioavailability after soil ingestion
Joanna Wragg, Mark Cave (British Geological Survey, UK)
Test and calibration of a standard plant organic contaminants uptake model
Stefan Trapp (Technical University of Denmark, DK)
Integration of modelling and field data in the vapour inhalation pathway
Renato Baciocchi, Iason Verginelli (University of Rome Tor Vergata, IT), Roberto
Pecoraro (Versalis, IT)
Vapour intrusion modelling - crystal ball or crystal clear?
Jeroen Provoost (FI)
Misunderstandings or misuses in practical applications
Yvonne Ohlsson (Swedish Geotechnical Institute, SE)
25
Auditorium 11
SpS 1C.23S Nanoremediation 1- all you wanted to know (a practical guide to
nanoremediation)
Organizers: Paul Bardos (r3 environmental technology ltd, GB), Juergen Braun (University of
Stuttgart, DE), Miroslav ernk (Technical University of Liberec, CZ), Dan Elliott (Geosyntec
Consultants, US), Elsa Limasset (BRGM, FR), Hans-Peter Koschitzky (University of Stuttgart,
DE)
Moderator: Paul Bardos (r3 environmental technology ltd, UK)
Part I of the Nanoremediation session focuses on providing a practical grounding in
nanoremediation theory and practice with particular reference to applied examples in the field.
Part II of the session focuses on providing business and strategic intelligence for delegates
with interests in utilizing or developing nanoremediation activities within their organisations or
at client sites. (Part II is scheduled on 11 June 2014 at 11:00 hrs in Auditorium 11.)
Nanotechnologies could offer a step-change in remediation capabilities: treating persistent
contaminants which have limited remediation alternatives. In 2007 in Europe it was forecast
that the 2010 world market for environmental nanotechnologies would be around $6 billion
(JRC Ispra 2007). In fact, adoption of nanoremediation has been much slower. However, the
recent emergence of nanoremediation as a commercially-deployed remediation technology in
several EU countries indicates that it is timely to reconsider its potential applications and the
consequent implications for their business activities.
Since early 2014, the EU FP7 NanoRem project (www.nanorem.eu) has been carrying out an
intensive development and optimisation programme for different nanoparticles (NPs), along
with analysis and testing methods, investigations of fate and transport of the NPs and their
environmental impact. NanoRem is a 14 million international collaborative project with 28
Partners from 12 EU countries, and linkages to the USA and Asia. It is a major initiative,
which will support the effective deployment of nanoremediation technologies in Europe.
Program:
What nano-remediation is and what it can and cannot do
Miroslav ernk (Technical University Liberec, Czech Republic)
Practical experience in nanoremediation
Dan Elliott (Geosyntec Consultants, USA)
Regulatory perspective on nanoremediation use
Elsa Limasset (BRGM, France)
The NanoRem experience: large scale and case study testing
Jrgen Braun (University of Stuttgart, Germany)
Questions and answers
Meeting Room 20
SpS 1C.6S Sustainability in contaminated site management case Finland
Organizers: Jaana Sorvari (Aalto University, FI), Seppo Nikunen (Pyry Finland Oy, FI), Jussi
Reinikainen, Outi Pyy (Finnish Environment Institute, FI), Anna-Maija Pajukallio (Ministry of
the Environment, FI)
Moderator: Jaana Sorvari (Aalto University, FI)
In Finland, the number of potentially contaminated sites, recorded in the national database
known as MATTI, currently totals some 25,000. Most of these sites have not yet been
investigated but it has been estimated that 11,000 sites need to be remediated in the future.
The estimated cost of these activities is 4 billion euros. At the same time, state funding is
scarce and covers roughly only 5-10% of the total costs. Hence, in most cases the costs of
remediation need to be paid by private problem owners. This is a challenge from the
viewpoint of the realization of sustainable contaminated site management (CSM) since no
incentives actually exist to consider all components of sustainability in decision making.
The session aims to present how Finland has tried to solve the problem of the implementation
of sustainability principle in CSM, when both the economic and human resources are scarce,
market is limited and the practical issues such as logistics and lack of guidelines create
barriers to it.
26
Program:
Introduction
Jaana Sorvari (Aalto University, FI)
National remediation strategy and renewing of the state funding system
Anna-Maija Pajukallio (Ministry of the Environment, FI)
New guidelines to implement sustainability principle in CSM
Jussi Reinikainen (Finnish Environment Institute, FI)
Experiences of the use of in situ techniques vs. traditional dig and dump
Seppo Nikunen (Pyry Finland Oy, FI)
A case study on addressing soil contamination in an expanding city during and by means
of the planning of new areas
Kaarina Laakso (City of Helsinki, FI)
Panel discussion
Meeting Room 18
SpS 3.1S Challenges for application of Aquifer Thermal Energy Storage in Europe
Organizers: Martin Bloemendal (Delft University of Technology, NL), Frans van de Ven (Delft
University of Technology / Deltares, NL), Nanne Hoekstra (Deltares, NL)
Moderator: Ruud Cino (Ministry of Infrastructure and Environment, NL
In Climate KIC E-use, groundreach and geopower projects several barriers were identified for
ATES development in different European countries. Distinction was made between immature
and mature market problems and general barriers. Research is ongoing to solve the identified
barriers. Which barriers are most important, which research is needed to solve these barriers,
and if not already lined-up, how can we address the questions at hand?
Program:
Barrier identification and ATES research
Nanne Hoekstra (Deltares, NL)
Functioning of ATES systems in practice / Building (control) system
Stefan Kranz (GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, DE)
Effect of heterogeneity on temperature distribution in ATES wells
Wijb Sommer (Wageningen University and Research centre, NL)
Unfamiliarity with potential ATES suitability/potential in world
Martin Bloemendal (Delft University of Technology / KWR Water cycle research institute
NL)
Pitches on projects dealing with identified barriers and discussion:
- Swimming pool Alzamora Spain with new type geoexchanger; legislation barrier
Julin Rodrguez, (Itecon, ES)
- Nike distribution centre. Barrier high investment, uncertainty on performance
Wouter Gevaerts (ARCADIS, BE)
- A project from Italy or Germany
speaker to be defined
Discussion
Wrap-up; which questions are most important, how can we address them?
27
Explanation:
Hall number

Meeting Room 19
SpS 4.2S Artificial recharge of coastal aquifers
Organizers: Koen Zuurbier (KWR Watercycle Research Institute, NL), Gualbert H.P. Oude
Essink (Deltares / Utrecht University, NL), Niels Hartog (KWR Watercycle Research Institute /
Utrecht University, NL)
Moderator: Niels Hartog (KWR Watercycle Research Institute / Utrecht University, NL)
Local, small-scale managed aquifer recharge (MAR) may provide site-tailored freshwater
management solutions in coastal areas that are increasingly under pressure through both
population growth and climate change. These solutions may provide flexible solutions worldwide for varying conditions, such as more extreme water events (drought and pluvial
flooding). The local MAR-solutions demonstrate robust solutions for freshwater management
by exploiting temporal natural freshwater sources (rainwater, surface water, drainage water,
waste water) for abstraction upon storage in times of demand for irrigation, industrial, and
drinking water purposes. Through the analysis of various field cases it can be demonstrated
how to deal with different geological settings, application in brackish/saline groundwater,
water quality changes and pre-treatment preceding injection.
Program:
An introduction to the rise of MAR for local freshwater management in the Netherlands
Carl Paauwe (Waterbuffer foundation, NL)
The use of sophisticated well configuration to enable freshwater aquifer storage and
recovery (ASR) in coastal aquifers
Koen Zuurbier (KWR Watercycle Research Institute, NL)
Potential for removal of pathogens during aquifer storage and recovery (ASR) in an
agricultural setting for self-sufficiency of freshwater
Jouke Velstra (Acacia Water, NL)
Large scale application of small scale managed aquifer recharge (MAR) systems in the
saline coastal delta of Bangladesh
Boris van Breukelen (VU University Amsterdam, NL)
On promising techniques for local fresh groundwater supply in the Southwestern Delta,
The Netherlands: GO-FRESH
Gualbert Oude Essink (Deltares / Utrecht University, NL)
MAR as a solution for freshwater management on a small Danish island (Falster)
Klaus Hinsby (GEUS, DK)
Discussion
Wrap-up; which are the important research questions, directions for the future, challenges
and how can we address them?
Auditorium 10
SpS 1B.4S TRIAD investigations of soil and groundwater contamination experiences
and future possibilities, pros and cons
Organizers: Dorte Harrekilde (Ramboll, DK), Anna Toft, Peter Lysholm Tchsen (The Capital
Region of Denmark, DK)
Moderator: Dorte Harrekilde (Ramboll, DK)
The use of the TRIAD approach to investigate contaminated sites has increased over the past
years in Europe. The TRIAD approach aims at achieving a greater sample density and realtime analyses with systematic planning and dynamic work strategies. One of the overall
objectives is to minimize the number of field campaigns and to reduce nuisances for the
property owner by assuring more rapid investigations.
28
During this session experiences with the TRIAD approach will be presented and discussed.
Further on the program: pros and cons for using TRIAD, challenges, contaminants that are
most suitable for TRIAD investigations, constraints in suitability depending on the type of
investigation to be carried out i.e. when is the TRIAD approach suitable for delineating a
groundwater plume, for carrying out initial soil investigations or for more complex
investigations, quality of TRIAD investigations compared to traditional investigations, use of
elements of the TRIAD approach in traditional investigations.
Programme;
Suitablity of the TRIAD concept to different types of investigation and contaminants

experiences from the Capital Region of Denmark, Peter Lysholm Tchsen, The Capital
Region of Denmark, 10 minutes presentation followed by 20 minutes discussion
Presentation of geoprobe techniques used in TRIAD investigations and analytical

possibilities, Eugen Martac, Fugro, 10 minutes presentation followed by 20 minutes
discussion
Logistics, planning and execution strategies for a successful project outcome, Dorte
Harrekilde, Ramboll, 10 minutes presentation followed by 20 minutes discussion
Meeting Room 17
SpS 1C.24S Nanoremediation part 2 - your future business opportunities (strategic and
market intelligence)
Organizers: Paul Bardos (r3 environmental technology ltd, GB), Stephan Bartke (Helmholtz
Centre for Environmental Research, DE), Nicola Harries (CL:AIRE, GB), Hans-Peter
Koschitzky (University of Stuttgart, DE)
Moderator: Nicola Harries (CL:AIRE, GB)
Part II of the Nanoremediation session focuses on providing business and strategic
intelligence for delegates with interests in utilizing or developing nanoremediation activities
within their organisations or at client sites.
(Part I of the session is scheduled on 11 June, from 9:00-10.30 hrs Auditorium 11, and
provides a practical grounding in nanoremediation theory and practice.)
Nanotechnologies could offer a step-change in remediation capabilities: treating persistent
contaminants which have limited remediation alternatives. In 2007 in Europe it was forecast
that the 2010 world market for environmental nanotechnologies would be around $6 billion
(JRC Ispra 2007). In fact, adoption of nanoremediation has been much slower. However, the
recent emergence of nanoremediation as a commercially-deployed remediation technology in
several EU countries indicates that it is timely to reconsider its potential applications and the
consequent implications for their business activities.
Since early 2014, the EU FP7 NanoRem project (www.nanorem.eu) has been carrying out an
intensive development and optimisation programme for different nanoparticles (NPs), along
with analysis and testing methods, investigations of fate and transport of the NPs and their
environmental impact. NanoRem is a 14 million international collaborative project with 28
Partners from 12 EU countries, and linkages to the USA and Asia. It is a major initiative,
which will support the effective deployment of nanoremediation technologies in Europe.
Program:
Preliminary scenarios for the EU nanoremediation market in 2025 assessment of
market drivers (opportunities and challenges) affecting the take-up of nanoremediation
Stephan Bartke (Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ, DE)
Discussion in groups about market prospects and drivers
Plenary reporting back of discussion groups
Auditorium 12
ThS 1C.12 In situ remediation technologies 1
Chair: Magda Grifoll
An innovation to increase rate and performance of in situ bioremediation development
of a new technology
Jeremy Birnstingl (Regenesis, GB), Ben Mork (Regenesis, US)
In-situ zinc bioprecipitation through organic substrate injection in a high-flow aquifer: from
laboratory to full-scale
Mattias Verbeeck (Antea Group, BE), Richard Lookman, Johan Gemoets (VITO nv, BE),
Beatrijs Lambi (Antea Group, BE)
In situ biological treatment of nitrate-polluted groundwater for drinking water production
29
Irene Jubany, Montserrat Calderer (Fundaci CTM Centre Tecnolgic, ES), Ester
Vilanova, Jordi Font-Capo, Jorge Molinero (Amphos 21 Consulting S.L, ES), Roser Grau,
Esteve Pint (Catalana de Perforacions, P.I. Sta Anna, 4.2, 08251 Santpedor, ES)
Full-scale electrokinetics-enhanced bioremediation (EK-BIO) of PCE DNAPL source area
in clay till
Charlotte Riis, Martin Bymose, Dorte Pade (Niras A/S, DK), Evan Cox, James Wang
(Geosyntec Consultants, US), David Gent (US Army Corps of Engineers ERDC, US),
Mads Terkelsen (Capital Region, DK)
Predicting tools for an optimal in situ bioremediation strategy in a hydrocarbons
contaminated rail yard site
Laura Tiano, Jrgen Mlgaard Christensen (Biorem Aps, DK), Beate Mller (DB Netz AG,
DE), Michael Petzold (DB AG, DE)
Meeting Room 20
ThS 1C.7 Strategies for remediation and brownfield regeneration
Chair: Ida Holm Olesen
Regeneration of brownfield mega-sites a review of existing and emerging technologies
and their application for a test-site
Lauge Clausen, Stefan Trapp (Technical University of Denmark, DK)
Pollution of soil and groundwater by industrial oils dumping in Jarama River Basin
(Madrid, Spain)
Fermn Villarroya, Esperanza Montero, Juan Pedro Martn (Universidad Complutense de
Madrid, ES)
Lac Megantic: The rehabilitation of a town following a petroleum loaded train explosion
Michel Beaulieu (MDDELCC, CA)
Remediation in China
John Ulrik Bastrup (Geo, DK), Jie Cheng (Dongzhimen Nandajie, CN), Daniel Chiang
(Wuxi Taihu Lake Restoration Co., CN)
Combined remedy synergies examples and conceptual road map
Jeremy Birnstingl (Regenesis, GB)
Meeting Room 18
SpS 3.3S Unforeseen events in management of the subsurface: learning practice
Organizers: Jasper Lackin (Witteveen+Bos, NL), Justine Oomes (Ministry of Infrastructure
and Environment, NL), Roelof Stuurman (Deltares, NL),. Jaap Tuinstra (Dutch Soil Protection
Technical Committee TCB, NL), Timo Heimovaara (TU Delft, NL; to be confirmed)
Moderator: Justine Oomes (Ministry of Infrastructure and Environment, NL)
In order to realize our ambition on climate, energy and a comfortable living environment the
subsurface will be used more intensively in the near future. Rapid innovations and economic
circumstances give the opportunity to increase our use of the subsurface. This increase in
multiple uses creates a pressure on the subsurface which needs to be managed. Unforeseen
events occur in every-day projects and can have negative social, cost or environmental
impacts and limit other uses in the subsurface. This was the reason for a preliminary Dutch
study and recent publication Unexpected events in the subsurface (TCB, Witteveen+Bos
and Deltares). This study implies a broad analysis of causes and consequences combined
with lessons learned from illustrated cases. It resulted in insights with respect to the negative
impact of unforeseen events and the factors that play an important role in occurrence and
prevention. Looking at traditional tendering (knowledge sharing, risk evaluation and liability)
and High Reliable Organizations helps us to find possible solutions to manage unforeseen
events. The preliminary study has shown that knowledge availability and sharing, risk sharing
during tendering, transparency and attitude toward unforeseen events and good governance
play an important role in enhancing our grip on unforeseen events. The session organizers
wish to enrich the Dutch experiences and lessons learned with experiences of professionals
from other countries represented on AquaConsoil.
Program:
Unforeseen events in the subsurface: a problem?
Jaap Tuinstra (Dutch Soil Protection Technical Committee, NL)
Delflandse kust - Building with Nature, flooding due to dike remediation
Roelof Stuurman (Deltares, NL)
Gertsewoud, wrong use of slag after bursting soils
Jasper Lackin (Witteveen+Bos, NL)
How to predict long term effects
Timo Heimovaara (TU Delft, The Netherlands) to be confirmed
30
Two extra pitches representing practice with unforeseen events in other countries
Discussion in subgroups around cases presented in the pitches, on possible solutions
and approaches to anticipate
Plenary discussion on the main results from the subgroups
Conclusions, wrap-up
31
Explanation:
Hall number

Meeting Room 19
ThS 1A.5 Persistence of historical and emerging subsurface contaminants
Chair: Peter Grathwohl
Hydrocarbons bioavailability change during bioremediation and its implication for
risk assessment
Frederic Coulon (Cranfield University, GB), Guozhong Wu (Tsinghua University, CN),
Cedric Kechavarzi (University of Cambridge, GB), Ruben Sakrabani, Amii Whelan
(Cranfield University, GB)
Can aged spiked soils reflect bioaccessibility of native PAHs in historically
contaminated soils?
Andreas Loibner (BOKU, AT), Kerstin E. Scherr (University of Natural Resources and
Life Sciences Vienna, AT), Eva Edelmann, Stefan Humel, Dietmar Kopp (BOKU,
University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna, AT), Philipp Mayer
(Technical University of Denmark, DK)
Remediation of polycyclic aromatic compounds contaminated soils by chemical
oxidation and bioremediation: consequences on polar PAC (degradation, formation and
mobility) Sitraka Andriatsihoarana, Marine Boulang, Salma Ouali (Universit de
Lorraine, FR), Catherine Lorgeoux (CNRS / Universit de Lorraine, FR), Dlphine
Catteloin, Ogier Hanser (Universit de Lorraine, FR), Aurlie Cebron (CNRS / Universit
de Lorraine, FR), Stfan Colombano, Alain Saada (Brgm, FR), Pierre Faure
(CNRS/Universit de Lorraine, FR)
Characterization of dozens of sites around the globe impacted by
perfluorinated compounds: common encounters and lessons learned
Dave Woodward (AECOM, US), Rachael Casson (AECOM, AU), Dora Chiang (AECOM,
DE)
Screening for fluorinated compounds (PFAS) around potential sources of pollution
at Danish defence establishments
Jacqueline Anne Falkenberg (NIRAS, DK), Mette Marie Mygind, Anne Mette
Bruner Lindof (Ministry of Defence, DK), Jette Kjge Olsen, Jens Dengs Jensen,
Anders Christensen (NIRAS, DK)
Auditorium 10
SpS 1C.28S European advances in nanoremediation technology
In-situ Groundwater Remediation Using Carbo-Iron: Large Scale Flume
Experiment to Investigate Transport and Reactivity in a source-treatment approach
Kumiko Miyajima (University of Stuttgart, DE), Katrin Mackenzie (Helmholtz Centre
for Environmental Research - UFZ, DE), Juergen Braun (University of Stuttgart, DE)
Reactivity tests in columns for simulating source zone and plume remediation of
chlorinated hydrocarbons by zero-valent metal particles under subsurface-like
conditions
Christine Herrmann, Maurice Menadier, Norbert Klaas (University of Stuttgart,DE)
Agar agar stabilized milled zerovalent iron particles for in situ groundwater
remediation
Milica Velimirovic, Doris Schmid, Stephan Wagner, Vesna Micic Batka, Frank von
der Kammer, Thilo Hofmann (University of Vienna, AT)
Demonstrating Nanoremediation in the Field - The NanoRem Test Sites
Juergen Braun (University of Stuttgart, DE), Randi Bitsch (Solvay AG, SE), Matthias
Kraatz (Golder Associates GmbH, DE), Jorge Gonalves (Geoplano-Consultores,
S.A, PT), Nerea Otaegi (Tecnalia Research & Innovation, Geldo, ES), Noam
Weisbrod (Zuckerberg Institute for Water Research, Blaustein Institutes for Desert
Research, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, IL), Petr Kvapil (AQUATEST a.s.,
CZ)
32
Performance of Carbo-Iron particles in in-situ groundwater plume and source

treatment approaches
Katrin Mackenzie, Steffen Bleyl, Frank-Dieter Kopinke (Helmholtz Centre for
Environmental Research, DE)
Nanoiron and Carbo-Iron particle transport in aquifer sediments - Targeted
deposition
Steffen Bleyl, Katrin Mackenzie, Anett Georgi, Frank-Dieter Kopinke (Helmholtz
Centre for Environmental Research, DE)
Auditorium 11
ThS 1C.26 Thermal remediation 1
Chair: Thomas H. Larsen
How Effective is Thermal Remediation of DNAPL Source Zones in Reducing
Groundwater Concentrations?
Ralph Baker, Gorm Heron, Steffen Griepke Nielsen (TerraTherm, Inc., US), Niels
Ploug (Krger A/S, DK)
Indoor thermal remediation in an old industrial area in the capital region of Denmark
Katerina Hantzi, Ida Damgaard (Capital Region of Denmark, DK), Jes Holm (Geo,
DK), Pernille Kjrsgaard (Orbicon A/S, DK)
Mixture of high and low boiling compounds in a mixed low and high permeable setting
Thermal design considerations
Jesper Holm, Niels Ploug, Max Jensen (Krger A/S, DK), Steffen Griepke Nielsen,
Gorm Heron (TerraTherm, US)
Experiences using Gas Thermal Remediation (GTR) in Denmark
Jacob H. Christiansen (COWI Denmark, DK)
In-situ thermal remediation of CVOCs from source zone containing chlorinated
solvents and motor oil as NAPL
Carol Winell, Cavis Carpenter, Grant Geckeler (Good Earthkeeping Organization Inc., US)
Auditorium 12
SpS 1C.29S Four countries approach to solving a contaminated site issue
Organizers: Danish Knowledge Exchange Group
Chair: Hans Fredborg, Central Region Denmark
The session aims to highlight both differences and similarities in our approaches across national
borders exemplified by England, Italy, the Netherlands and the Czech Republic and to
inspire us to collaborate with and learn from our European neighbors.
The case: A valve and steel company has contaminated a site with trichloroethylene. A
developer would like to build houses on the site. What would it demand and how would this be
handled in different countries?
Each country is represented by an environmental consultant, who will present the handling of
such a case from the national perspective of their country. The description of the case given to
the consultants includes some questions to ensure that the differences between the different
countries can be compared.
Outline of the session:
Session introduction Hans Fredborg, Central Region Denmark (5 min)
Case introduction Winnie Hyldegaard, Grontmij (10 min)
UK case solution Phil Studds, Ramboll (15 min)
IT case solution Sara Ceccon, Environ Italy (15 min)
NL case solution Hans Slenders/Rachelle Verburg, ARCADIS (15 min)
CZ case solution Petr Kozubek, Enacon (15 min)
Panel/plenum discussion (15 min)
Polling equipment will be available to the audience during this session. Polling questions will be
asked before the individual presentations and during the panel discussion.
33
Meeting Room 20
ThS 1C.8 Uncertainty in remediation
Chair: Jeremy Birnstingl
Tools for the Calculation of Remediation Times
Thomas Held (ARCADIS Deutschland GmbH, DE)
Analysis of remediation studies to assess the major factors influencing remediation
efficiency
Florian Cazals (INNOVASOL, FR), Olivier Atteia (EA 4592 G&E, ENSEGID, University of
Bordeaux, FR)
Estimation of remediation rates for chlorinated solvents in confined unsaturated media
Gro Lilbaek, Jacqueline Anne Falkenberg, Anders Christensen (NIRAS, DK), Helle
Overgaard (The Capital Region of Denmark, DK)
The use of smart DPE and real time data for maximising the return of investmaent in
contaminated land remediation
Anil Waduge (ARCADIS, GB)
Strategic management of uncertainties of remediation costs by identification of critical
parameters and sensitivity analysis on costs: methodology and case studies
Karen Van Geert, Wouter Gevaerts, Gerlinde De Moor, Anja Vandercappellen (ARCADIS
Belgium, BE)
Meeting Room 18
ThS 3.4 Subsurface planning and management
Chair: Elsa Limasset
Improved recirculation system to treat a chlorinated solvent contamination and to
allow for heat recuperation
Karen van Geert, Isabelle Olivier, Wouter Gevaerts, Jeroen Verhack, Thomas van
Humbeeck (ARCADIS Belgium, BE)
Understanding the environmental risks associated with shale gas development in the UK
George Prpich, Frederic Coulon, Gill Drew, Simon Pollard, Ben Anthony (Cranfield
University, GB)
Aquifer Thermal Energy Systems in areas of drinking water and groundwater pollutions
Lars Jacobsen, Jesper Furdal, John Ulrik Bastrup (Geo, DK)
Shallow groundwater in NW Italy and perspectives for geothermal purposes
Arianna Bucci, Domenico Antonio De Luca, Manuela Lasagna (University of Turin, IT)
Lets make groundwater STRONGer A watersystem-based approach towards 3D
spatial development
Reinier Romijn (Dutch Water Authorities, NL), Almer Bolman
(Dutch Water
Authorities / WS Vallei & Veluwe, NL)
34
Explanation:
Hall number

Meeting Room 19
SpS 4.3S Climate robust water availability management for industry and agriculture
Organizers: Hans van Duijne (Deltares/Wageningen University, NL)
Moderator: Jan Vreeburg (Wageningen University, NL), together with PhDs
The availability of fresh water is under pressure in coastal and (semi-)arid regions due to
climate change leading to extended drought periods, sea level rise, and due to increased
water demands by industry, agriculture and domestic sectors. This session will debate new
regional solutions for securing water availability and the need of cross sectorial cooperation
between government, industry, agriculture, and scientists.
Program:
The global and local perspective and the role of green infrastructure and subsurface
in fresh water supply in water scarce regions
Huub Rijnaarts (Wageningen University, NL)
Global change and the role of government: how to obtain more involvement of
industry and research in solving local water availability and the sustainable use
subsurface Ruud Cino (Ministry of Infrastructure and Environment, NL)
Cooperation in water management between urban, rural and industrial
stakeholders: from regional water management perspective to local
implementation Representative of the Barcelona region, Spain
The ambition of industry in sustainable use of resources including water and
subsurface; tailoring industrial operations and regional settings towards self-sufficient
water management
Niels Groot / Heenk Pool (Dow Chemical/Dow Benelux, NL)
Considering the influence of climatic uncertainty in designing measures to protect
and restore critical water resources
Scott Warner (ENVIRON International Corporation, US), Devon Rowe (ENVIRON,
US); Gretchen Greene (ENVIRON International Corporation, US)
Auditorium 10
ThS 1B.9 Risk modeling
Chair: Frederic Coulon
Assessment of risks due to the permeation of organic contaminants in
groundwater through polyethylene drinking water pipes
Piet Otte (National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, NL), Martin Schans,
Martin Meerkerk (KWR Watercycle Research Institute, NL), Frank Swartjes (National
Institute of Public Health and the Environment, NL)
Quantification of contaminant transport from sediment
Paul Frogner-Kockum, Mrta Lndell, Gunnel Gransson, Yvonne Ohlsson (Swedish
Geotechnical Institute, SE)
Assessing risk of contaminated soil with catchment area models experiences
and possibilities
Bianca Pedersen (Ramboll Denmark, DK), Dorte Harrekilde, Lars Bennedsen (Rambll,
DK), Kristian Bitsch, Britt Boye Thrane (Ramboll Denmark, DK)
Improvements with geostatistics for lithology representative fields and flow models
at Sellafield site
Jean-Marc Chautru, Claire Faucheux, Yvon Desnoyers (Geovariances, FR), Nick
Jefferies, Peter Jackson (AMEC Foster Wheeler, GB), Ian Teasdale, Julian Cruickshank
(Sellafield, GB)
Matrix diffusion in groundwater aquifers
Dave T. Adamson (GSI Environmental Inc., US), Henrik Engdal Steffensen (NIRAS A/S,
DK), Charles J. Newell (GSI Environmental Inc., US), Niels D. Overheu, Mads
Terkelsen, Peder Johansen, Line Moerkebjerg Fischer (Capital Region, DK), Charlotte
Riis, Anders Christensen (NIRAS, DK)
35
Auditorium 11
ThS 1C.27 Thermal remediation 2
Chair: Ian Ross
Factors Affecting the Success of In Situ Thermal Remedies: Case Studies
John LaChance, Kevin Crowder, Erin Hauber (ARCADIS, US), and Gerlinde De
Moor (ARCADIS, BE)
In-situ thermal remediation at a site with DNAPL in overburden above fractured rock
Gorm Heron, Jim Galligan, Robin Swift (TerraTherm, US), Bruce Thompson, Jessie
McCusker (demaximis, US), Michael Gefell, John LaChance (ARCADIS, US)
Steam-air injection in fractured bedrock: results and lessons learned of a CHCremediation at the site Biswurm (Villingen-Schwenningen, Germany)
Oliver Trtschler, Hans-Peter Koschitzky (University of Stuttgart, VEGAS, DE), Bernd
Lidola, Isabell Kleeberg (Stadtbauamt Villingen-Schwenningen, DE), Stefan Schulze
(GEOsens, DE)
Complex boundary conditions for in-situ thermal treatments (ISTT) conducted during land
recycling and remediation beneath buildings
Uwe Hiester, Martina Mller (reconsite GmbH, DE)
Thermal treatment challenges and solutions
Steffen Griepke Nielsen, Gorm Heron, Ralph Baker (TerraTherm, Inc., US), Niels Ploug
(Krger A/S, DK)
Auditorium 12
ThS 1C.13 In situ remediation technologies 2
Chair: Charlotte Riis
Feasibility of bioscreens for regional VOC-plume in industrial-urban area
Katrien Van De Wiele, Johan Ceenaeme (OVAM, BE)
Aerobic bioremediation: new solutions and approaches for a consolidated technology
Lorenzo Sacchetti (Carus Europe, ES)
A combination of anaerobic and aerobic bioremediation to treat a complex mixture of
contaminants at a landfill site
John Dijk, Antonio Distante, Martin Slooijer (BioSoil International BV, NL), Giovanni
Buscone, Laura Ledda (Tauw Italia S.r.I., IT)
Field pilot test of in situ biostimulation and bioaugmentation of phenoxyacid pesticides
as a remedy for a pesticide point source
Katerina Tsitonaki, Sandra Roost, Kresten Andersen, Lars Christian Larsen, Nina Tuxen
(Orbicon A/S, DK), Katrine Smith (Danish EPA, DK), Hasse Milter (Region Zealand,
DK), Ulrich Gosewinkel, Tue Kjrgaard Nielsen, Anders Johansen (Aarhus University,
Frederiksborgvej 399, 4000 Roskilde, DK)
Novel and advanced chemical interpretation methods documenting Monitored Natural
Attenuation (MNA) of pesticides
Trine Jepsen (Orbicon, DK), Hasse Milter (Region Zealand, DK), Mads Georg Mller,
Nina Tuxen, Niels Dssing, Lars Christian Larsen, Janni Thomsen (Orbicon, DK)
Meeting Room 20
SpS 1C.30S US EPA 2: Evolution of optimization programs and key trends in cleanup
and R&D
Protection Agency)
The evolution of the Superfund program has progressed from an early focus on pump & treat
systems and long term monitoring networks, to a more comprehensive and holistic site
evaluation conducted at any phase throughout the cleanup process. The ultimate goal being
design, construction, and operation of the most efficient, effective, and protective remedies
EPA and stakeholders can provide.
This session will explore the evolution of EPAs optimization programs and highlight how
thinking has evolved from presumptive application of large scale aggressive remediation
technologies to a focus on high resolution site characterization and conceptual site model
development in support of adaptive management for application of multiple targeted treatment
technologies. The session will then open for a discussion on key trends in cleanup, research
and development efforts, and needs faced by the cleanup community as a whole.
36
Meeting Room 18
SpS 3.2S Get inspired help shape the European strategic research agenda on soil,
land use and land management
Organizers: Margot de Cleen (Ministry of Infrastructure and the Environment, NL), Sandra
Boekhold (Soil Protection Technical Committee, NL), and INSPIRATION project team
members
Moderator: Paul Nathanail (University of Nottingham, UK)
This session will illustrate how the soil-water-sediment system is interconnected, influenced
by land use and land management (the connectivity concept) and thus impacts solutions of
great societal challenges such as climate change adaptation, food and drinking water security,
resource efficiency, energy transition and the circular economy. Information about the H2020project INSPIRATION will be shared; this project is a coordination and support action aiming
at developing a Strategic Research Agenda (SRA) for Europe on Integrated Spatial Planning,
land use and soil management. Information will be exchanged on the main societal
challenges in different regions of Europe related to the sustainable use and management of
lands soil-water-sediment system. An outline will be given on shared national and European
research priorities and potential funders and stakeholders (willing to invest).
An aim is also to contribute to (or enable) the formation or strengthening of transnational
networks on similar themes and to anticipate on possible cooperation within consortia for
Horizon 2020.
Program:
Connectivity of the complex soil-water-sediment system in relation to land use and land
management
Key note presentation speaker to be confirmed
Introduction on INSPIRATION
Detlef Grimski, project coordinator (Federal Environmental Agency, DE)
Discussion in groups on societal issues related to land use, land management and the
use of the soil-water-sediment system that are high on national and regional (research)
agendas
Plenary reporting back
Discussion in groups on priority research subjects and potential stakeholders and funders
for these main themes
Plenary reporting back
Closing remarks
37
Explanation:
Hall number
Friday 12 June 09:00-10:30

Meeting Room 19
SpS 1C.31S US EPA session 3: Optimizing remedies, greener cleanups and trends in
site cleanup
Protection Agency)
As the EPA Superfund Cleanup program moves forward with the cleanup of the most
contaminated sites in the U.S., the concept of remedy optimization has become a central tenet
to maximize the return on cleanup investments.
This session will be more in-depth and technical than session 1C.30S, focusing on trends in
the use of various treatment technologies in the context of lessons learned from optimization
reviews. The session will also cover green remediation perspectives, including developments
and findings from the application of green remediation in the U.S. Superfund and other cleanup
programs and insights on the recently released American Society of Testing and Materials
(ASTM) Standard Guide for Greener Cleanups. The session will include a brief discussion of
how EPA integrates social and economic elements of sustainability in Superfund cleanups.
Auditorium 10
ThS 1B.10 Risk management and practice
Chair: Thomas H. Larsen
State of play: is risk assessment a help or hindrance in sustainable decision making
for contaminated sites across the globe?
Katy Baker (ARCADIS EC Harris, GB), Debanjan Bandyopadhyay (SENES Consultants
India Pvt. Ltd., ARCADIS, IN), Aurelie Blusseau (ARCADIS ESG, FR), Pawel Goldsztejn
(ARCADIS Sp. z o.o., PL), Lien Heynderickx (ARCADIS Belgium nv, BE), Patricia Iezzi
(ARCADIS Logos, BR), Francesco Ioppolo (ARCADIS Italia, IT), Joe Jiao (ARCADIS
EC Harris, CN), Ragna Jansen (ARCADIS Netherlands, NL), Christian Niederer (BMG
Engineering AG, CH), Harriet Phillips (SENES Consultants, ARCADIS, CA), Greet
Schrauwen (ARCADIS Deutschland GmbH, DE), Tamar Schlekat (ARCADIS U.S., Inc,
US)
Promoting defensible risk-based decisions and sustainability in contaminated
land management in Finland
Jussi Reinikainen (Finnish Environment Institute, SYKE, FI)
An approach to risk assessment and management of contaminated land in P.R. of China
Steve Leroi, Adrien Kahn (SITA Remediation, BE)
Direct toxicity testing for contaminated land management
Katalin Gruiz (Budapest University of Technology and Economics, HU)
Groundwaters use in agriculture and chemical contamination: need for a risk
assessment framework in Italy
Mario Carere, Laura Achene, Luca Lucentini, Eleonora Beccaloni (National Institute of
Health, IT)
Auditorium 11
ThS 1C.25 Phytoremediation
Chair: Nina Tuxen
Citric acid enhanced plant growth, antioxidant defense system, and phytoextraction
of chromium by Brassica napus L.
Shafaqat Ali, Saima Aslam Bharwana, Muhammad Rizwan, Sehar Afshan, Mujahid Farid
(Government College University Faisalabad, PK), Nabeel Khan Niazi, Irshad Bibi
(Southern Cross University/University of Agriculture Faisalabad, PK)
38
Potential of alfalfa for the treatment of hydrocarbons and heavy metals cocontaminated soils: effect of bioaugmentation-assisted phytoremediation
David Huguenot, Ana Carolina Agnello, Eric Van Hullebusch (Universit Paris Est
Marne la Valle, FR), Giovanni Esposito (University of Cassino, IT)
Fate and behavior of TCE in willow trees during phytoremediation
Philipp Schftner, Andrea Watzinger, Philipp Holzknecht, Bernhard Wimmer, Thomas
Reichenauer (AIT Austrian Institute of Technology GmbH, AT)
Cost-benefit analyses of arsenic contaminated soil phytoremediation in China
Xiaoming Wan (Chinese Academy of Sciences, CN)
Phyto remediation using the Chinese brake fern pteris vittata
Stefan Outzen (OutzenPro, DK), Mads Terkelsen (Capital Region, DK), John Ulrik
Bastrup (Geo, DK)
Auditorium 12
ThS 1C.21 New remediation technologies 2
Chair: Marco Petrangeli Papini
Direct-Push High Pressure Jet Injection for Rapid Amendment Delivery in

Low- Permeability Zones: Full-Scale Demonstration
Chapman Ross, Neal Durant (Geosyntec Consultants, US), Bill Slack, Doug Knight
(FRx,Inc., US), Torben Hjbjerg Jrgensen, Eline Begtrup Weeth, Kirsten Rgge (Cowi,
DK), Peder Johansen, Mads Terkelsen (Capital Region, DK)
The use of renewable energy for ventilation of capillary break layers under buildings
at polluted sites
Jakob Washington Skovsgaard, Morten Nrgaard Christensen, Mette Christophersen
(Rambll Denmark, DK), Kim Risom Thygesen, Klaus Bundgaard Mortensen (Region of
Southern Denmark, DK)
Surfactant Enhanced Aquifer Restoration at Former Chemical Works
Christopher Taylor-King (Celtic Technologies Ltd, GB)
Application of Trap and Treat Technology for achieving sustainable remediation of
contrasting contaminant plumes
James Wilson (URS Infrastructure and Environment UK Ltd, GB), Palle Ejlskov (Ejlskov A/S,
DK)
Jet a recovery using micellar flooding: design and implementation
Konstantinos Kostarelos (University of Houston, US), Ahmad Seyedabbasi (GSI
Environmental Inc., US), Sren Rygaard Lenschow (NIRAS A/S, DK), Marinos Stylianou
(University of Cyprus, CY), Phillip C. DeBlanc (GSI Environmental Inc., US), Mette Marie
Mygind (Danish Ministry of Defense, DK), Anders Christensen
(NIRAS, DK)
Meeting Room 20
ThS 1D.2 Large scale inventories and strategies for dealing with contamination
Chair: Poul Bjerg
Regionally approached groundwater management in Zwolle: preventing risks and utilizing
opportunities
Corinne Koot (Witteveen+Bos, NL), Reinder Slager (3Dimensies, NL), Martijn van Houten
(Witteveen+Bos, NL), Annemiek Wiegman (Gemeente Zwolle, NL)
A groundwater management plan for Stuttgart
Sandra Vasin, Hermann Josef Kirchholtes (City of Stuttgart, DE)
Large scale systematic mapping and prioritization of possible soil contaminations a
method to protect drinkingwater resources, surface water and human health in Denmark
Thomas Imbert Villumsen, Annie Wejhe Simonsen, Lotte Nielsen (Capital Region of
Denmark, DK)
Success and failure factors area-wide groundwater management
Arne Alphenaar (TTE Consultants NL), Frank Swartjes (RIVM, NL), Piet Otte (RIVM, NL),
Reinder Slager (3Dimensies, NL)
Flowers from Brabant
Jan Frank Mars (RWS leefomgeving Bodem+, NL), Peter Ramakers (Province North
Brabant, NL), Reinder Slager (3Dimensies, NL)
39
Meeting Room 18
SpS 2.1S The carbon dilemma: biomass for the biobased economy or for soil fertility?
Organizers: Sandra Boekhold (Soil Protection Technical Committee, NL), Margot de Cleen
(Dutch Ministry of Infrastructure and the Environment, NL)
Moderator: Margot de Cleen (Dutch Ministry of Infrastructure and the Environment, NL)
Harvest biomass for a biobased economy or leave it on the land for soil fertility? This is the
central topic of this session. Soil organic matter is an important asset of soils. It is relevant for
soil fertility and food security, water holding capacity and carbon storage. Loss of soil organic
matter is considered to be a threat in the EU soil strategy. Additionally, society aims at
sustainable development goals and greening the economy. Soil organic matter is a key
parameter for these aspirations. How can soil quality be maintained in a biobased economy
that increasingly demands biomass. Can we estimate an optimal soil organic content? What
percentage of the harvest residues should be left on the land? Does it matter which crop to
grow? What is the environmental risk of potentially contaminated organic residues?
Program:
Welcome and general introduction
Short pitches to illustrate the topic
Discussion in groups on the carbon dilemma
Plenary feed back
Closing remarks

Final Program

Загружено:

Сведения о документе

Авторское право

Доступные форматы

Поделиться этим документом

Поделиться или встроить документ

Параметры публикации

Этот документ был вам полезен?

Это неприемлемый материал?

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

Final Program

Загружено:

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

1

See next pages for details per session

See next pages for details per session

Poster social event

See next pages for details per session

See next pages for details per session

Parallel lecture sessions and special sessions

Tour 1B: Development of new investigation and remediation technologies

Tour 1C: Pollution in limestone aquifers- challenges and Remediation Methods

Lecture sessions and special sessions

Tuesday 9 June 11:00-12:30

Tuesday 9 June 14:00-15:30

Implementation, experience etc. seen

Experience from with two landfills

Tuesday 9 June 16:00-17:30

Wednesday 10 June 09:00-10:30

Progress towards an ISO document on sustainable remediation

Wednesday 10 June 11:00-12:30

Wednesday 10 June 14:00-15:30

Wednesday 10 June 16:00-17:30

Thursday 11 June 09:00-10:30

Thursday 11 June 11:00-12:30

Suitablity of the TRIAD concept to different types of investigation and contaminants

Presentation of geoprobe techniques used in TRIAD investigations and analytical

Thursday 11 June 14:00-15:30

Performance of Carbo-Iron particles in in-situ groundwater plume and source

Session introduction Hans Fredborg, Central Region Denmark (5 min)

Case introduction Winnie Hyldegaard, Grontmij (10 min)

UK case solution Phil Studds, Ramboll (15 min)

IT case solution Sara Ceccon, Environ Italy (15 min)

NL case solution Hans Slenders/Rachelle Verburg, ARCADIS (15 min)

CZ case solution Petr Kozubek, Enacon (15 min)

Panel/plenum discussion (15 min)

Thursday 11 June 16:00-17:30

Friday 12 June 09:00-10:30

Direct-Push High Pressure Jet Injection for Rapid Amendment Delivery in

Вам также может понравиться