Date: 5th June 2014 Examiner: Captain Thompson Duration: 1h 15mins (felt like 5 hours) Result: Pass No polite chat, just straight into the questions before my arse hit the seat! Asked if my ship was a special purpose ship. Asked about additional certification for special purpose ships. Wanted to know how scientists are signed on and what certificates they require. Also asked what training they need in order to be classed as crew. SEAs for scientists? What information they contain? Given an MAIB report about the tanker Willy (although the name had been changed on the report he gave me) which ran aground near Plymouth. What would I have done differently? This led to a conversation about preparations before leaving the anchorage. Passage planning. Consulting C/E about fuel, SECA areas, what would I do if I didnt have enough low sulphur fuel to slow steam for 2 days. Talked about records in Sulphur book if I had to change over to heavy fuel. Wanted to know about heavy weather ballasting and propeller immersion. Spoke about informing the company and charterers, what I would do if the charterers told me I had to stay where I was, ready to load cargo. This led to a discussion about masters authority under ISM. Then he said that I hadnt done any of those things, had left it too late and was drifting towards the rocks. What would I have done differently then? Letting go 2nd anchor, paying out all cable to reduce rate of drift. Send distress message, requesting towage and helicopter assistance to evacuate non-essential personnel, tanks pressed up with IG, covering decks with foam to prevent explosion. Spoke briefly about salvage and Lloyds open form, how would you agree to LOF. What emergency towing equipment on tankers? How would I connect a tow when I had both anchors out and couldnt recover them (connect tow aft first). SOPEP plan. Reporting to SOSREP. What information should the initial report contain? He confused me a bit throughout this entire scenario as he kept switching between me being the master on this tanker and then putting me back on my own ship. Im joining a new vessel, what certificates should be onboard. I missed IEEC, ISSC and CSR so got asked in detail about these. What is EEDI and SEEMP? What is low sulphur fuel? Ice navigation Advice I would give to OOW? Various ice related questions .additional lookouts, use of searchlights, radar detection of ice, icing
on antennas, when I would reduce speed, keeping windows free of ice,
how many clearview screens must a ship have, heating in the wiper motors (he told me that), heated EPIRB brackets (told me that one too). I said mine didnt have this but we have a second EPIRB inside the bridge. Could large bergs have an effect on GPS? Multi-path errors? How can this be prevented? Wanted to know about antenna siting and elevation masks. What is HDOP? RAIM Traffic light monitoring. Difficulties for position fixing when in ice? Wanted to know about V-AIS in areas where buoyage cant be used. Explained how it appears on ECDIS and how it works. What is meant by the term stiff ship and tender ship and give examples of each? What radio equipment is required for A3 and A4 vessels? Rules What does rule 19 say? What is restricted visibility? Why does it say to reduce speed when you hear a fog signal forward of beam? Why does it not say to reduce speed when fog signal is heard apparently abaft the beam? Why are no distances given in the rules regarding when to take action? Smarty board In each scenario I was asked to identify the vessel, what action I would take and which rules I was applying: F -Open water: PDV 50m> crossing from port to starboard. -Following a TSS: PDV 50m> crossing from port to starboard. -Following a TSS: CBD crossing from port to starboard at a good distance? Asked him to clarify good distance and he said ROC does not exist at this stage. -Following a TSS: CBD crossing from port to starboard, ROC exists. Put 2 model ships on the table. Scenario was bulk carrier crossing from port to starboard, Ive just arrived on the bridge, the bulk carrier has not taken action and we are now less than 0.1 apart. What would I do? Talked about taking action which would best aid to avoid a collision. Wanted to know about may take action and must take action. In the scenario he gave me the best action was to go hard to port. Radar plot (already completed with true and relative vectors) Target A: 3 points port, crossing, no ROC. Target B: 1 point stbd, I am overtaking, ROC exists. Could go either way but would make bold alteration of course to port because of the action target B may take.
Then he said those wonderful words.well then Miss Laidlow I think
well call that a pass! Thanks to all the lecturers at STC. Keep up the good work chaps! Thats me off to Tahiti to drink gin pimms