Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
191-201, 1996
Copyright 1996 Elsevier Science Ltd
Printed in Great Britain. All rights reserved
0261-5177/96 $15.00 + ILOi)
/ Pergamon
S026 I-5 ! 77(96)00006-4
and those concerning the organizational structures, attitudes and behaviour of all the members
of the organization. The size of the transformation necessary reveals that the lasting organizational change in total quality implies a change in
the culture of the organization, which should
necessarily be brought in by the management.
Changing the organizational structure towards
total quality means providing all the members of
an organization with a shared values system, and
implementing a powerful and commonly accepted
method for keeping this alive by means of continuous practice, centred on top management
action and socialization work, amongst which
training and recycling play an essential role.
The introduction of a TQM system requires largescale changes, both of the management tools used
191
LEADERSHIP
i0 %
8%
9%
PROCESSES
14 %
PNOPI~ ON ~_. ~
CIISTOMER~
..
R
50 %
r
[ IsMP
~
ON
J
Figure 1 The total quality management model of the
EFQM
entire organization, varies broadly, since each company has its own version adapted to its culture and
competitive strategy.
Nonetheless, there is a series of broad ideas,
based on a relevant number of successful experiences, that enables us to contrast them empirically.
Amongst these, one might mention methods such as
those of Crosby, 7 Deming, ~ or Juran and Gryna, 9 as
well as the approaches that stem from the different
quality prizes which were started to encourage the
implementation of total quality plans in companies.
These plans are used with increasing frequency as
tools for evaluating and improving the quality
system of a company. The first award was established in 1951 in Japan. It was called 'Deming' as a
tribute to the main who, with his teachings about
quality, played a decisive role in the Japanese
economic recovery. In 1987, the 'Malcolm Baldrige'
award was created in the USA. This initiative was
followed in Europe in 1991, when the European
Foundation for Quality Management (EFQM),
together with the European Organization for Quality (EOQ) and the European Commission, created
the 'European Quality Award' in order to improve
the quality and reliability of products and services. It
takes two forms:
The 'European Quality Award', which rewards
the company that is the maximum exponent of
TQM in Western Europe;
The 'European Quality Prize', which rewards a
certain number of companies that show the
excellence of their quality management as a basic
process of continuous improvement.
The European quality model allows strengths and
weaknesses to be distinguished clearly, focusing on
the relationship among personnel, processes and
results. Processes are the means through which a
company guides and liberates its staff's aptitudes
with the aim of getting results. Therefore, processes
and people are the 'agents' that provide 'results'.
192
193
194
195
196
Score (% ~
Deployment/scope
Enablers
The assessor scores each part of the enablers criteria on the basis of the combination of two factors:
1. Fhe degree of excellence of your approach,
2. The degree of deployment of your approach.
Anecdotal or non-value adding
I)
25
5(I
('lear evidcncc of soundly based systematic approaches and preventionbased systems. Clear evidence of refinement and improved business
cflectivencss through review cycles. Good integration of approach inlo
normal opcrations and planning
75
(7lear evidcncc of soundly based systematic approaches and preventionbased systems. Clear evidence of refinement and improved business
cftcctivencss through review cycles. Approach has become totally
integrated into normal working patterns. Could be used a role model for
other organizations
l(ll)
For both ' A p p r o a c h ' and "Deployment', the assessor may choose one of five levels 0 % , 25%, 50%, 75%, or 100% ;,is presented in the
chart, or interpolate between thcsc values.
Results
The assessor scores each of the results criteria on the basis of the combination of two factors:
I. The degree of excellence of your results.
2. The scope of your results.
Anecdotal
I)
25
50
75
lt)l)
For both 'Rcsults' and 'Scope', the assessor may choose one of five levels 0%, 25%, 50%, 75%, or 100% as presented in thc chart, or
interpolate between these values.
Source: E F Q M (1994).
normally within the top 25% of European companies. In results, the social impact and e c o n o m i c
results also receive high marks, although the most
outstanding factor is this group's conviction that its
staff's satisfaction level is on a par with the 10% of
excellent companies in Europe, and even that customer satisfaction has no comparison with any candidate for said year.
A more segmented analysis of the sample enables
the opinions to be adjusted and to obtain four
relevant conclusions:
Urban hotels emerge as the accommodation business with greater standards of excellence, from
the standpoints of both customers and management.
The widest gap can be observed in coastal hotels,
in which customers' dissatisfaction is evident in all
criteria. These. appear to be the hotels least
adapted to their customers' needs and requirements, They are particularly critical in resources,
revealing their awareness of the obsolescence of
installations and the broad margin of improve197
.I
8
~.
._-
6
.,..,
e-
c~
8
n
==
8
:=_
.I
k,
'~=~,
e~
e"G
,,;d
"
,- =
"-G
..0
I
~
,.-t
"5
,fi
L"
~ ~~
"G
"
e~
.~
,'-1
"5
,=_
.,=
r.z.,
I~
198
. ~
.--
;~
O
~
","
","
Table 4
Criteria
0-10
11-20
21-30
31-40
% mark
41-50
51-60
61-70
71-80
81-90
Leadership
Pol. and strat.
Pers. manag.
Resources
Processes
Client satisf.
Persn. satisl.
Social impact
Econ. results
0
0
0
5
0
0
0
0
0
(I
5
0
0
0
5
10
5
0
5
10
5
5
5
15
20
10
5
30
25
25
15
25
20
25
30
25
20
20
20
25
35
20
0
15
30
20
15
15
15
1(~
111
2(!
25
1(I
25
10
25
20
10
10
15
5
10
0
5
10
15
15
20
10
10
211
0
10
(I
0
(I
0
11
0
0
Conclusions
T Q M is seen to be an essential management technology for laying the foundations of competitiveness for
tourist concerns and their search for excellence at
the present time, characterized by an urgent need to
confront the universalization of the economy and a
hostile and turbulent environment in which competitiveness requires more and more management
capacity.
Nevertheless, empirical research developed on the
E F Q M model of T Q M as a support for the European Quality Award and on the two 'partially dependent' stages of the methodology we constructed
reveals great backwardness in Valencia's hotel industry on the road towards total quality, which is
particularly acute in the coastal accommodation
199
200
merit is only economically justifiable when it generates company income differentiating this from its
competitors; and, conversely, costs go down as the
conformity of quality rises. Consequently, Valencian
hotel companies with the highest official qualifications could be undervaluing the business opportunities the greater design quality of their establishments
offers, as their conformity and service quality are not
on a par with the design specifications in which the
needs and requirements of their customers are
framed. Both these phenomena involve higher costs
or losses of income which detract from their operating accounts.
The development of new systems of qualification,
able to evaluate the total quality of a hotel business,
is coming forward as a. promising area for research
and is of undoubted usefulness, owing to its contribution to eliminating information asymmetry.
Acknowledgement
This study benefited from a grant from the Spanish
Education and Science Ministry (ref PB93-0692,
DGICYT).
References
1Witt, C A and Muhlemann, A P 'The implementation of total
quality management in tourism: some guidelines' Tourism Management 1994 15 (6) 416-424
ZGamble, P and Jones, P 'Quality as a strategic issue' in Teare, R
and Boer, A (eds) Strategic Hospitality Management. Theory and
Practice for the 1990s Cassell, London, 72-83 (1991)
3Saunders, I W and Graham, M A 'Total quality management in
the hospitality industry' Total Quality Management 1992 3 (3)
243-255
4Coyle, M P and Dale, B G 'Quality in the hospitality industry: a
study" lnt J Hospitality Management 1993 12 (2) 141-153
5Teare, R 'Designing a contemporary hotel service culture' lnt J
Service Industry Management 1993 4 (2) 63-73
6Weiermair, K 'Quality management in tourism: lessons from the
service industries' in Tourism Research: Achievements', Results"
and Unresolved Puzzles Editions AIEST, St Gallen, 93-113
7Crosby, P B Quality is" Free. The Art of Making Quality Certain
McGraw-Hill, New York (1979)
8Deming, W E Out of the Crisis'. Quality, Productivity-and
Competitive Position MIT Press, Cambridge (1982)
'~Juran, J M and Gryna, F M Quality Control Handbook 4th edn,
McGraw-Hill, New York (1993)
~European Foundation for Quality Management Self-Assessment
Based on European Model of Total Quality Management European Foundation for Quality Management, Brussels (1994)
~JWisner, J D and Eakins, S G "A performance assessment of the
US Baldrige Quality Award winners' lnt J Quality & Reliabifity
Management 1994 11 (2) 19-21
~2Camis6n, C and Montfort, V 'La empresa turistica valenciana:
diagn6stico estrat6gico y posicionamiento competitivo' Papers de
Turisme 1993 5 11-25
13Camis6n, C, Monfort, V and Bign6, E. 'The Spanish toursim
industry: analysis of its strategies and the efficacy and achievements gained from them' in Seaton, A V (ed) Tourism. The State
of the Art Wiley, Chichester, 442452 (1994)
14Amor, F et al 'Barriers found in repositioning a Mediterranean
"sun and beach" product: the Valencian case" in Seaton, A V
(ed), op cit, 428-435
2() 1