Proposed Rule: Social Security Benefits: Federal Old Age, Survivors, and Disability Insurance&#8212 Visual Disorders Evaluation Criteria Revision

48342 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No.
158 / Wednesday, August 17, 2005 / Proposed Rules
145–30–0028, Revision 09, dated March 1, safe manner, and consequent reduced Modifications Done According to Previous
2004; certificated in any category. controllability of the airplane. Revisions of the Service Bulletin
Unsafe Condition Compliance (g) Modifications done before the effective
(d) This AD was prompted by a report (e) You are responsible for having the date of this AD in accordance with the
indicating that the fully automated digital actions required by this AD performed within revisions of the service bulletin in Table 1 of
electronic control (FADEC) unit failed to the compliance times specified, unless the this AD are acceptable for compliance with
compensate for ice accretion on the engine actions have already been done. the corresponding action in this AD,
fan blades, which was caused by a false provided that the additional actions specified
temperature signal from the total air Modification
in PART III of the Accomplishment
temperature (TAT) sensor to the FADEC. We (f) Within 180 days after the effective date
Instructions of EMBRAER Service Bulletin
are issuing this AD to prevent failure of the of this AD: Modify the TAT sensor heating
145–30–0028, Revision 09, dated March 1,
TAT sensor, which could result in system in accordance with the
insufficient thrust either to take off or (if Accomplishment Instructions of EMBRAER 2004, are accomplished within the
coupled with the loss of an engine during Service Bulletin 145–30–0028, Revision 09, compliance time required by paragraph (f) of
takeoff) the inability to abort the takeoff in a dated March 1, 2004. this AD.
TABLE 1.—PREVIOUS REVISIONS OF THE SERVICE BULLETIN

EMBRAER service bulletin Revision Date
145–30–0028 .............................................................................. 04 March 13, 2001.

145–30–0028 .............................................................................. 05 May 24, 2001.
145–30–0028 .............................................................................. 06 September 26, 2001.
145–30–0028 .............................................................................. 07 April 10, 2003.
145–30–0028 .............................................................................. 08 August 20, 2003.
Credit for Replacement of FADEC Instructions of the applicable service bulletin maintenance computer (CMC) upgrades, as
Assemblies listed in Table 2 of this AD, is acceptable for well as any other applicable actions
compliance with paragraph (f) of this AD. If associated with upgrading the EICAS and
(h) Replacing the existing FADEC
the FADEC assemblies are replaced with new CMC, must also be done, as specified in
assemblies with new or modified FADEC or modified assemblies as specified in this paragraph 1.C., ‘‘Description—Time for
assemblies that include software version 7.6, paragraph, all applicable engine indication Accomplishment’’ of the applicable
in accordance with the Accomplishment and crew alerting system (EICAS) and central EMBRAER service bulletin.
TABLE 2.—SERVICE BULLETINS FOR UPGRADING FADEC ASSEMBLIES

EMBRAER serv-
For EMBRAER model— Revision Date
ice bulletin
EMB–135ER, –135KE, –135KL, –135LR, –145, –145ER, 145–73–0021 ..... Original .................................. July 23, 2004.
–145MR, –145LR, –145XR, –145MP, and –145EP.
EMB–135ER, –135KE, –135KL, –135LR, –145, –145ER, 145–73–0022 ..... 01 ........................................... July 15, 2004.
–145MR, –145LR, -145XR, –145MP, and –145EP.
EMB–135ER, –135KE, –135KL, –135LR, –145, –145ER, 145–73–0023 ..... Original .................................. June 28, 2004.
–145MR, –145LR, –145XR, –145MP, and –145EP.
EMB–135ER, –135KE, –135KL, –135LR, –145, –145ER, 145–73–0024 ..... 01 ........................................... July 15, 2004.
–145MR, –145LR, –145XR, –145MP, and –145EP.
EMB–135ER, –135KE, –135KL, –135LR, –145, –145ER, 145–73–0025 ..... Original .................................. July 23, 2004.
–145MR, –145LR, –145XR, –145MP, and –145EP.
EMB–145XR ........................................................................... 145–73–0026 ..... Original .................................. June 28, 2004.
EMB–135BJ ............................................................................ 145LEG–73– 01 ........................................... July 15, 2004.
0003.
EMB–135BJ ............................................................................ 145LEG–73– 02 ........................................... October 6, 2004.
0004.
Alternative Methods of Compliance Issued in Renton, Washington, on August SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
(AMOCs) 9, 2005.
(i) The Manager, International Branch, Ali Bahrami, 20 CFR Part 404
ANM–116, Transport Airplane Directorate, Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, [Regulation No. 4]
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs Aircraft Certification Service.
for this AD, if requested in accordance with [FR Doc. 05–16262 Filed 8–16–05; 8:45 am] RIN 0960–AF34
the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
Revised Medical Criteria for Evaluating
Related Information Visual Disorders
(j) Brazilian airworthiness directive 2004–
01–02R2, dated November 29, 2004, also AGENCY: Social Security Administration.
addresses the subject of this AD. ACTION: Proposed rules.
SUMMARY: We propose to revise the
criteria in the Listing of Impairments
(the listings) that we use to evaluate
VerDate jul<14>2003 12:19 Aug 16, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00018 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\17AUP1.SGM 17AUP1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 158 / Wednesday, August 17, 2005 / Proposed Rules 48343
claims involving visual disorders. We Specialist, Office of Disability and blindness if you are disabled or blind
apply these criteria when you claim Income Security Programs, Social and have limited income and resources.
benefits based on disability under title Security Administration, 100 Altmeyer,
II and title XVI of the Social Security 6401 Security Boulevard, Baltimore, How Do We Define Blindness?
Act (the Act). The proposed revisions Maryland 21235–6401, (410) 965–0020 For both the title II and title XVI
reflect our program experience and or TTY (410) 966–5609. For information programs, the Act defines blindness as
advances in medical knowledge, on eligibility or filing for benefits, call ‘‘central visual acuity of 20/200 or less
treatment, and methods of evaluating our national toll-free number, 1–800– in the better eye with the use of a
visual disorders. 772–1213 or TTY 1–800–325–0778, or correcting lens. An eye which is
DATES: To be sure your comments are visit our Internet Web site, Social accompanied by a limitation in the
considered, we must receive them by Security Online, at http:// fields of vision such that the widest
October 17, 2005. www.socialsecurity.gov. diameter of the visual field subtends an
ADDRESSES: You may give us your SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: angle no greater than 20 degrees shall be
comments by: using our Internet site considered * * * as having a central
facility (i.e., Social Security Online) at What Programs Would These Proposed visual acuity of 20/200 or less.’’
http://policy.ssa.gov/pnpublic.nsf/ Regulations Affect? (Sections 216(i)(1) and 1614(a)(2) of the
LawsRegs or the Federal eRulemaking These proposed regulations would Act.)
Portal at http://www.regulations.gov; e- affect disability and blindness If you are seeking benefits under title
mail to regulations@ssa.gov; telefax to determinations and decisions that we II, your blindness generally must meet
(410) 966–2830; or by letter to the make under title II and title XVI of the the 12-month statutory duration
Commissioner of Social Security, P.O. Act. In addition, to the extent that
Box 17703, Baltimore, Maryland 21235– requirement. However, if you are
Medicare entitlement and Medicaid seeking payments under title XVI of the
7703. You may also deliver them to the eligibility are based on whether you
Office of Regulations, Social Security Act, your blindness need not meet the
qualify for disability or blindness 12-month statutory duration
Administration, 100 Altmeyer Building, benefits under title II or title XVI, these
6401 Security Boulevard, Baltimore, requirement. Also, if you are seeking
proposed regulations also would affect payments under title XVI of the Act,
Maryland 21235–6401, between 8 a.m. the Medicare and Medicaid programs.
and 4:30 p.m. on regular business days. there is no requirement that you be
Comments are posted on our Internet Who Can Get Disability or Blindness unable to do any substantial gainful
site at http://policy.ssa.gov/ Benefits? activity (SGA). However, if you are
pnpublic.nsf/LawsRegs or you may working, we will consider your earnings
Under title II of the Act, we provide
inspect them on regular business days to determine if you are eligible for SSI
for the payment of disability benefits,
by making arrangements with the payments.
including disability benefits based on
contact person shown in this preamble. blindness, if you are disabled and How Do We Define Disability?
Electronic Version: The electronic file belong to one of the following three
of this document is available on the date groups: Under both the title II and title XVI
of publication in the Federal Register at • Workers insured under the Act; programs, disability must be the result
http://www.gpoaccess.gov/fr/ • Children of insured workers; and of any medically determinable physical
index.html. It is also available on the • Widows, widowers, and surviving or mental impairment or combination of
Internet site for SSA (i.e., Social divorced spouses (see 20 CFR 404.336) impairments that is expected to result in
Security Online) at http:// of insured workers. death or which has lasted or is expected
policy.ssa.gov/pnpublic.nsf/LawsRegs. Under title XVI of the Act, we provide to last for a continuous period of at least
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: for Supplemental Security Income (SSI) 12 months. Our definitions of disability
Robert Augustine, Social Insurance payments on the basis of disability or are shown in the following table:
Disability means you have a medically determinable impairment(s) as

If you file a claim under * * * And you are * * * described above and that results in * * *
title II ................................................ an adult or a child .......................... the inability to do any SGA.

title XVI ............................................ a person age 18 or older ............... the inability to do any SGA.
title XVI ............................................ a person under age 18 .................. marked and severe functional limitations.
There is also an additional definition doing any gainful activity without determinations or decisions of
of disability if you are seeking benefits considering vocational factors, or that disability. The listings are in two parts.
under title II of the Act, have attained result in ‘‘marked and severe functional There are listings for adults (part A) and
age 55, and have blindness as defined in limitations’’ in children seeking SSI for children (part B). If you are a person
section 216(i)(1) of the Act: Disability payments based on disability under title age 18 or over, we apply the listings in
means that the blindness has resulted in XVI of the Act. Although we publish the part A when we assess your claim, and
the inability to engage in SGA requiring listings only in appendix 1 to subpart P we never use the listings in part B.
skills or abilities comparable to those of of part 404 of our rules, we incorporate If you are an individual under age 18,
any gainful activity in which you them by reference in the SSI program in we first use the criteria in part B of the
previously engaged with some regularity § 416.925 of our regulations, and apply listings. If the listings in part B do not
and over a substantial period of time. them to claims under both title II and apply, and the specific disease
title XVI of the Act. process(es) has a similar effect on adults
What are the Listings? and children, we then use the criteria in
The listings are examples of How Do We Use the Listings? part A. (See §§ 404.1525 and 416.925.)
impairments that we consider severe We generally use the medical criteria If your impairment(s) does not meet
enough to prevent an individual from in the listings only to make the criteria in any listing, we will also
48344 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 158 / Wednesday, August 17, 2005 / Proposed Rules
consider whether it medically equals published final rules that included (Ophthalmoplegia is paralysis of the eye
any listing; that is, whether it is as revisions to the special senses and muscles.) As the causes of this disorder
medically severe as the criteria in the speech listings in the Federal Register are now more readily detectable and
listed impairment. (See §§ 404.1526 and on December 6, 1985 (50 FR 50068). We treatable, this disorder has become
416.926.) last published final rules making extremely rare. Therefore, we propose to
We will never deny your claim or comprehensive revisions to the part A remove both the current listing and the
decide that you no longer qualify for special senses and speech listings in the guidance in the introductory text that
benefits because your impairment(s) Federal Register on March 27, 1979 (44 addresses this disorder. Instead, we
does not meet or medically equal a FR 18170), and final rules making would evaluate total bilateral
listing. If you have a severe comprehensive revisions to the part B ophthalmoplegia and other eye muscle
impairment(s) that does not meet or special senses and speech listings on disorders by assessing the impact of
medically equal any listing, we may still March 16, 1977 (42 FR 14705). The such disorders on your visual efficiency
find you disabled based on other rules current special senses and speech under proposed listing 2.04, or based on
in the ‘‘sequential evaluation process’’ listings will no longer be effective on your actual visual functioning.
that we use to evaluate all disability July 2, 2005, unless we extend them, or The first paragraph of current 2.00A6,
claims. (See §§ 404.1520, 416.920, and revise and issue them again. ‘‘Special situations,’’ explains how we
416.924.)
Also, when we conduct reviews to When Will We Start To Use These calculate visual acuity efficiency for
determine whether your disability Proposed Rules? individuals with aphakia (the absence of
continues, we will not find that your the anatomical lens of the eye).
We will not use these proposed rules Advances in technology have led to the
disability has ended based only on any until we evaluate the public comments
changes in the listings. Our regulations development of effective synthetic
we receive on them, determine whether intraocular lenses. Also, contact lenses
explain that, when we change our to issue them as final rules, and issue
listings, we continue to use our prior have been technically refined and may
final rules in the Federal Register. If we be used in those instances in which the
listings when we review your case, if publish final rules, we will explain in
you qualified for disability benefits or anatomical lens is not replaced with a
the preamble how we will apply them, synthetic lens. Because the synthetic
SSI payments based on our and we will summarize and respond to
determination or decision that your intraocular lens or the contact lens
the major public comments. Until the corrects both the visual acuity and the
impairment(s) met or medically equaled effective date of any final rules, we will
the listings. In these cases, we visual field, we would compute the
continue to use our current rules. visual acuity efficiency or visual field
determine whether you have
experienced medical improvement, and How Long Would These Proposed Rules efficiency as though the eye had an
if so, whether the medical improvement Be Effective? anatomical lens. Therefore, we no
is related to the ability to work. If your longer need this guidance.
If we publish these proposed rules as
condition(s) has medically improved so final rules, they will remain in effect for We propose to reorganize and expand
that you no longer meet or medically 8 years after the date they become the rest of the current introductory text
equal the prior listing, we evaluate your effective, unless we extend them, or for visual disorders to provide
case further to determine whether you revise and issue them again. additional guidance. The following is a
are currently disabled. We may find that detailed explanation of the proposed
you are currently disabled, depending How Are We Proposing To Change the introductory text.
on the full circumstances of your case. Introductory Text to the Special Senses
(See §§ 404.1594(c)(3)(i) and and Speech Listings for Adults? Proposed 2.00A—How Do We Evaluate
416.994(b)(2)(iv)(A)). If you are a child Visual Disorders?
2.00 Special Senses and Speech
who is eligible for SSI payments, we This section corresponds to current
follow a similar rule after we decide that We propose to remove the following
sections of current 2.00: 2.00A, ‘‘Disorders of Vision.’’ We
you have experienced medical propose to clarify the information in the
improvement in your condition(s). See • The last paragraph of 2.00A3,
‘‘Field of vision.’’ current section by reorganizing the
§ 416.994a(b)(2). material into eight subsections and by
• Paragraph 2.00A4, ‘‘Muscle
Why Are We Proposing To Revise the function.’’ providing additional guidance as
Listings for Visual Disorders? • The first paragraph of 2.00A6, explained below.
We are proposing these revisions to ‘‘Special situations.’’ Proposed 2.00A1—What Are Visual
update the medical criteria in the The last paragraph of current 2.00A3, Disorders?
listings for visual disorders and to ‘‘Field of vision,’’ explains that when
provide more information about how we the visual field loss is predominantly in This proposed section corresponds to
evaluate visual disorders. We are not the lower visual fields, a system such as current 2.00A1, ‘‘Causes of
proposing any changes here to the the weighted grid scale for perimetric impairment.’’ We propose to make
listings for disturbances of labyrinthine- fields as described by B. Esterman in nonsubstantive editorial changes for
vestibular function (listing 2.07), 1968 may be used for determining clarity.
hearing impairments (listings 2.08 and whether the visual field loss is Proposed 2.00A2—What Is Statutory
102.08), and loss of speech (listing 2.09). comparable to that described in table 2 Blindness?
However, we intend to publish in section 2.00 of the listings. As this
separately proposed rules that would kind of scale is rarely used, we believe This proposed section would revise
update the criteria for those disorders. that we no longer need this guidance in current 2.00A7, ‘‘Statutory blindness,’’
On April 24, 2002, we published final the introductory text. to include the statutory definition. We
rules in the Federal Register (67 FR Current 2.00A4, ‘‘Muscle function,’’ also propose to update the references to
20018) that included technical revisions describes the type of impairment the listings that show statutory
to the listings for special senses and evaluated under current listing 2.06, blindness to reflect the revised listing
speech disorders. Prior to this, we ‘‘Total bilateral ophthalmoplegia.’’ criteria.
Proposed 2.00A3—What Evidence Do with corrective lenses. Because pinhole acceptable automated perimeter and the
We Need To Establish Statutory testing may underestimate or Octopus perimeter is not widely used in
Blindness Under Title XVI? overestimate your visual acuity, we will the United States.
not use it to determine your best- In proposed 2.00A6a(iii), we describe
In this new section, we propose to
corrected visual acuity. the requirements of an acceptable
explain that when we make a
automated static threshold perimetry
determination or decision that you have Proposed 2.00A6—How Do We Measure test.
statutory blindness under title XVI, we Visual Fields? In proposed 2.00A6a(iv), we explain
require evidence showing only that the This section would replace current that to determine statutory blindness,
statutory criteria are satisfied; we do not 2.00A3, ‘‘Field of vision.’’ Current we need a test that measures the central
need evidence to document the visual 2.00A3 indicates that we will use ‘‘usual 24 to 30 degrees of the visual field. We
disorder that causes the blindness. We perimetric methods’’ or other also provide examples of acceptable
also propose to explain that there is no ‘‘comparable perimetric devices’’ to tests.
duration requirement for statutory measure the size of the visual field. The In proposed 2.00A6a(v), we explain
blindness under title XVI. Goldmann perimeter is specifically that to determine if the criterion in
We propose to add this section cited as a comparable perimetric device. 2.03B is met, we need a test, performed
because blindness is treated differently In its 2002 report, Visual on a Humphrey field analyzer, that
under title II and title XVI of the Act. Impairments: Determining Eligibility for measures the central 30 degrees of the
Under title II, blindness is generally Social Security Benefits, the National visual field. We explain that we can use
evaluated in the same way as other Research Council’s (NRC’s) Committee comparable results from other
medical impairments. Under title XVI, on Disability Determination for acceptable perimeters, and we provide
blindness and disability are separate Individuals with Visual Impairments an example of a comparable result. We
categories, and the requirements for stated, as part of its recommendations also explain that we cannot use tests
eligibility based on blindness are for improvements to assessing visual that do not measure the central 30
different from the requirements for field loss, ‘‘the current SSA standard degrees of the visual field, such as the
eligibility based on disability. should be revised so that disability Humphrey 24–2 test, to determine if
Proposed 2.00A4—What Evidence Do determinations are based on the results your impairment meets or medically
We Need to Evaluate Visual Disorders, of automated static projection perimetry equals listing 2.03B. This criterion,
Including Those That Result in rather than Goldmann (kinetic, which we are proposing in listing 2.03B,
Statutory Blindness Under Title II? nonautomated) visual fields.’’ (See the adopts the NRC’s recommendation in its
full citation at the end of this preamble.) 2002 report that we require a test
We propose to revise the last sentence These proposed rules would partially measuring the central 30 degrees of the
of current 2.00A1 to explain what adopt this recommendation and provide visual field.
evidence we need to evaluate a visual that we will use visual field In proposed 2.00A6a(vi), we explain
disorder. measurements obtained with an that we measure the extent of visual
Proposed 2.00A5—How Do We Measure automated static threshold perimetry field loss by determining the portion of
Best-Corrected Visual Acuity? test performed on a perimeter that meets the visual field in which you can see a
our requirements. However, we will also white III4e stimulus. This stimulus
We propose to revise the guidance in continue to use comparable visual field specification is the same as the
the second sentence of current 2.00A2, measurements obtained with Goldmann specification in the second paragraph of
‘‘Visual acuity,’’ by providing that, in or other kinetic perimetry. current 2.00A3.
addition to testing that uses Snellen In proposed 2.00A6a(i), we explain In proposed 2.00A6a(vii), we explain
methodology, we may also use visual when we need visual field testing. that we need to determine the decibel
acuity measurements obtained using In proposed 2.00A6a(ii), we explain (dB) level that corresponds to a 4e
another testing methodology that is that when we need to measure the intensity for the particular perimeter
comparable to Snellen methodology. We extent of your visual field loss, we will being used. We further explain that we
also propose to clarify what constitutes use visual field measurements obtained will then use the dB printout to
best-corrected visual acuity and to add with an automated static threshold determine which points would be seen
guidance indicating that we will not use perimetry test performed on a perimeter at the 4e intensity level. We also give an
the results of visual evoked response that meets our requirements. We example which explains that, for tests
testing or pinhole testing to determine adopted as our requirements the criteria performed on Humphrey perimeters,
best-corrected visual acuity. recommended in the NRC report any point seen at 10 dB or higher is a
Visual evoked response testing referred to above. We propose to cite the point that would be seen with a 4e
evaluates the function of the visual Humphrey Field Analyzer as an stimulus.
pathways from the retina, along the example of an acceptable perimeter In proposed 2.00A6a(viii), we explain
optic nerve and optic tract, to the vision because the NRC report cited it, and the that we can also use visual field
cortex in the occipital lobe of the brain. Humphrey Field Analyzer is the most measurements obtained using kinetic
While this testing can provide an widely used automated perimeter in the perimetry, such as the Humphrey ‘‘SSA
estimate of visual acuity, it is not a United States that is used to perform Test Kinetic’’ or Goldmann perimetry.
direct measure of visual acuity. this type of test. We contracted with West Virginia
Pinhole testing is used to determine The NRC report also cited the University to conduct research to
whether your visual acuity can be Octopus perimeter as another example determine whether the Humphrey ‘‘SSA
improved with a corrective lens. of an automated perimeter that meets Test Kinetic’’ is comparable to
However, you may not have the same the criteria set out in its Goldmann perimetry. This research,
degree of correction with corrective recommendations. We have not which was completed in April 2000,
lenses that you have with pinholes. included the Octopus perimeter as an showed that the Humphrey ‘‘SSA Test
Additionally, even though pinhole example of an acceptable perimeter in Kinetic’’ is comparable to Goldmann
testing fails to show an improvement in proposed 2.00A6a(ii), because it is not perimetry, except that the Humphrey
your acuity, your acuity may improve our intention to list in these rules every ‘‘SSA Test Kinetic’’ does not identify
scotomata, that is, non-seeing areas in current listing 2.04, which we are Proposed 2.00C—How Do We Evaluate
the visual field surrounded by seeing proposing to delete because it is Impairments That Do Not Meet One of
areas. Therefore, we propose to provide redundant. the Special Senses and Speech Listings?
that if we need additional information We propose to revise the guidance in
because your visual disorder has Proposed 2.00A8—How Do We Evaluate
Specific Visual Problems? the second paragraph of current 2.00A6
progressed to the point where it is likely by stating our basic adjudicative
to result in a significant limitation in the This section would replace current principle that if the impairment(s) does
central visual field, such as a scotoma, 2.00A6, ‘‘Special situations.’’ In this not meet or medically equal the criteria
we will supplement the automated of a listing in this body system, we must
section, we propose to add guidance for
kinetic perimetry with the results of a consider whether it meets or medically
evaluating specific visual problems. The
Humphrey 30–2 or comparable test. equals the criteria of a listing in another
In proposed 2.00A6a(ix), we explain following is a discussion of the
proposed section. body system. If not, we must continue
that we will not use the results of visual
the sequential evaluation process (see
field screening tests, such as Proposed 2.00A8a—Statutory Blindness §§ 404.1520 and 416.920) to determine
confrontation tests, tangent screen tests,
In this proposed section, we would whether you are disabled or continue to
or automated static screening tests, to
be disabled (see §§ 404.1594, 416.994
determine that your impairment meets codify in our regulations a longstanding
or medically equals a listing or to and 416.994a). This new section would
procedure. The most commonly used
evaluate your residual functional apply to all the impairments in this
visual acuity test charts are charts based
capacity. We also explain that we can body system, not just visual disorders.
on Snellen methodology. These charts
use normal results from visual field usually do not measure visual acuity How Are We Proposing To Change the
screening tests to determine whether the between 20/100 and 20/200. Therefore, Criteria in the Special Senses and
impact of your visual disorder on your if you are unable to read any of the Speech Listings for Adults?
visual field is severe when these results letters on the 20/100 line on a test chart
are consistent with the other evidence 2.01 Category of Impairments, Special
based on Snellen methodology, your Senses and Speech
in your case record. We would also list visual acuity will be assessed as 20/200
some circumstances under which we or less. We propose to remove the reservation
will not consider normal test results to for listing 2.05 because it is no longer
be consistent with the other evidence in There are newer test charts (not yet needed. We also propose to remove
the file. widely used, but comparable to charts current listing 2.06, ‘‘Total bilateral
Consistent with our proposed removal based on Snellen methodology) that ophthalmoplegia,’’ for the reasons cited
of the guidance on aphakia, we propose provide measurements of visual acuity above in the explanation of the
to remove the stimulus specifications between 20/100 and 20/200. Based on proposed removal of current 2.00A4,
used to test individuals with aphakia medical literature, we know that if your ‘‘Muscle function.’’
contained in the first two paragraphs of visual acuity is between 20/100 and 20/
current 2.00A3. 200 as measured on those newer test Proposed Listing 2.02—Loss of Visual
In proposed 2.00A6b, we would charts, it would be 20/200 if it were Acuity
revise the guidance in the first measured using the more common chart This proposed listing corresponds to
paragraph of current 2.00A3 on the use based on Snellen methodology. We current listing 2.02, ‘‘Impairment of
of corrective lenses during visual field explain in the proposed section that if visual acuity.’’ We propose to change
testing. We propose to explain that your visual acuity is measured using the heading to be consistent with other
eyeglasses must not be worn during the one of these newer charts, and you language in these proposed rules.
visual field examination because they cannot read any of the letters on the 20/
limit your field of vision, but contact Proposed Listing 2.03—Contraction of
100 line, we will determine that you
lenses or perimetric lenses may be used the Visual Field in the Better Eye
have statutory blindness based on a
in order to obtain the most accurate visual acuity of 20/200 or less. We also This proposed listing corresponds to
visual field measurements. We also provide that, regardless of the type of current listing 2.03, ‘‘Contraction of
provide that, for this single purpose, test chart used, you do not have peripheral visual fields in the better
you do not need to demonstrate that you statutory blindness if you can read at eye.’’ We propose to remove current
have the ability to use the contact or least one letter on the 20/100 line. listing 2.03A, which provides that an
perimetric lenses on a sustained basis. individual’s visual field loss is of
Proposed 2.00A8b—Blepharospasm listing-level severity when the field is
Proposed 2.00A7—How Do We contracted to 10 degrees or less from the
Calculate Visual Efficiency? We propose to describe the disorder
point of fixation. Current listing 2.03B
In this proposed section, we would and explain that we must consider how
provides that an individual’s visual
expand the guidance in current 2.00A5, the involuntary blinking that
field loss is of listing-level severity if
‘‘Visual efficiency,’’ by explaining how characterizes it can affect your ability to
that loss results in the widest diameter
we calculate visual acuity efficiency, maintain the measured visual acuities
of the field subtending an angle no
visual field efficiency, and visual and visual fields over time. greater than 20 degrees. Any visual field
efficiency. The provisions in proposed Proposed 2.00A8c—Scotoma loss that satisfies the criterion in current
2.00A7b are based on the first sentence listing 2.03A will also satisfy the
of paragraph 2 of the explanatory text We propose to define the term criterion in current listing 2.03B.
following Table 2 in the current rules. scotoma as a non-seeing area in the Therefore, current listing 2.03A is
As we explain below, we are proposing visual field surrounded by a seeing area. unnecessary. We also propose to
to delete that sentence because we are We also explain that when we measure redesignate current listing 2.03B as
moving it here. The provisions in your visual field, we will subtract the listing 2.03A, and to make
proposed 2.00A7c are based on the length of any scotoma, other than the nonsubstantive editorial changes.
current language of 2.00A5 as well as normal blind spot, from the overall In its 2002 report, the NRC suggested
the parenthetical statement at the end of length of any diameter on which it falls. that a mean deviation (MD) of ¥22 or
worse on an automated static threshold explanation of proposed 2.00A, the included a different example because
perimetry test measuring the central 30 following discussions describe only stroke is not likely to occur in children.
degrees of the visual field ‘‘would serve those provisions that are unique to the Proposed 102.00A4c is the same as
as a reasonable criterion for disability childhood rules or that require further proposed 2.00A4c.
determination.’’ (See the full citation at explanation specific to evaluating
Proposed 102.00A5—How Do We
the end of this preamble.) We agree with disability in children.
We propose to remove the second Measure Best-Corrected Visual Acuity?
the NRC and would add this criterion as
proposed listing 2.03B. paragraph of current 102.00A, ‘‘Visual In this section, we propose to revise
Proposed listing 2.03C corresponds to impairments in children.’’ This the guidance in the first paragraph of
current listing 2.03C. We propose to paragraph indicates that the current 102.00A. In proposed 102.00A5,
clarify the criterion by indicating that a accommodative reflex is generally not we would repeat the guidance in
determination of visual field efficiency present in children under 6 months of proposed 2.00A5. We also discuss, in
must be based on kinetic visual field age (or, for a premature child, until 6 proposed 102.00A5a, comparable visual
testing. months of age plus the number of acuity testing for children who are
months the child is premature). It also unable to participate in testing using
Proposed Listing 2.04—Loss of Visual Snellen methodology, for example,
provides that the absence of this reflex
Efficiency because they are too young, and add
should be considered indicative of a
This proposed listing corresponds to visual impairment only in children guidance for how we propose to
current listing 2.04, ‘‘Loss of visual above this age. We include this evaluate children who are unable to
efficiency.’’ As already explained, we guidance in the current rules to explain participate in testing using Snellen
propose to remove the parenthetical that it is not appropriate to use the methodology or other comparable
statement at the end of the current criterion in current listing 102.02B1 testing.
listing because it is redundant. until the child has reached the required
However, we propose to add a reference Proposed 102.00A6—How Do We
age. However, in these proposed Measure Visual Fields?
to that section of the proposed preface listings, current listing 102.02B1 would
as a reminder of where this guidance is be incorporated into the more general In this section, we propose to repeat
contained. category of abnormal anatomical the guidance in 2.00A6 with the
findings evaluated under proposed following exceptions:
Proposed Table 1—Percentage of Visual • We would not include macular
Acuity Efficiency Corresponding to the listing 102.02B2. As the lack of the
edema as an example of a visual
Best-Corrected Visual Acuity accommodative reflex would not be
disorder that could result in visual field
Measurement for Distance in the Better considered an abnormal anatomical
loss because this disorder is not likely
Eye finding in very young children, its
to occur in children.
absence would not satisfy the proposed • We would revise the guidance in
To be consistent with our proposed
listing criterion. Therefore, we no longer the first paragraph of proposed
removal of the introductory text on
aphakia, we propose to remove the need this explanation. 2.00A6a(ix) to include an additional
columns and guidance addressing Proposed 102.00A1—What Are Visual way we evaluate disability claims of
aphakia from current Table 1. We also Disorders? children who are filing for or are
propose to remove the entries for visual In this section, we would expand the receiving SSI payments.
acuities worse than 20/100 for the guidance in proposed 2.00A1 to indicate Proposed 102.00C—How Do We
reasons we gave under the explanation that a loss of visual acuity may affect Evaluate Impairments That Do Not Meet
of proposed 2.00A8a. other age-appropriate activities. We One of the Special Senses and Speech
Proposed Table 2—Charts of Visual added this example to reflect the way Listings?
Fields we evaluate disability claims of children In this section, we repeat the guidance
We propose to remove the first who are filing for or are receiving SSI in proposed 2.00C, but include the
sentence of current paragraph 2 in the payments. definition of disability for children who
explanation of how to use Table 2, Proposed 102.00A2—What Is Statutory are filing for or are receiving SSI
which provides instructions for Blindness? payments.
calculating the percent of visual field
In this section, we repeat the guidance How Are We Proposing To Change the
efficiency, since this provision has been
in proposed 2.00A2, but refer to the Criteria in the Special Senses and
moved to proposed 2.00A7b. We also
childhood listings that show statutory Speech Listings for Children?
propose to make nonsubstantive
blindness.
editorial changes for clarity. 102.01 Category of Impairments,
Proposed 102.00A4—What Evidence Do Special Sense Organs
How Are We Proposing To Change the
We Need To Evaluate Visual Disorders, We propose to add new listings
Introductory Text to the Special Senses
Including Those That Result in 102.03, ‘‘Contraction of the visual field
Listings for Children?
Statutory Blindness Under Title II? in the better eye,’’ and 102.04, ‘‘Loss of
102.00 Special Senses and Speech In this section, we propose to include visual efficiency,’’ because they apply to
Except for minor editorial changes, more detailed guidance than we now children as well as adults. Due to the
we have repeated much of the have in the third paragraph of current addition of these listings, we also
introductory text of proposed 2.00A in 102.00A. In proposed 102.00A4a, we propose to add Table 1, ‘‘Percentage of
the introductory text to proposed repeat the guidance in proposed section Visual Acuity Efficiency Corresponding
102.00A. This is because the same basic 2.00A4a. Proposed 102.00A4b is also to the Best-Corrected Visual Acuity
rules for establishing and evaluating the the same as proposed 2.00A4b, except Measurements for Distance in the Better
existence and severity of visual that we include ‘‘near drowning’’ rather Eye,’’ and Table 2, ‘‘Charts of Visual
disorders in adults also apply to than ‘‘stroke’’ as an example of a Fields.’’
children. Because we have already catastrophic event that could result in These proposed new listings and
described these provisions under the cortical blindness in children. We have tables are identical to the corresponding
adult listings and tables. Currently, we • Would more (but shorter) sections within 30 days of publication. To
use listings 2.03 and 2.04 (and their be better? receive a copy of the OMB clearance
corresponding tables) to evaluate • Could we improve clarity by adding package, you may call the SSA Reports
children with visual field and visual tables, lists, or diagrams? Clearance Officer on 410–965–0454.
efficiency impairments. With proposed • What else could we do to make the
References
listings 102.03 and 102.04 we would no rules easier to understand?
longer need to refer to the listings in We consulted the following sources
Regulatory Procedures when developing these proposed rules:
part A when we evaluate these
impairments in children. Executive Order 12866 Judie Charlton, MD, et al. ‘‘A
Comparison of Manual and Automated
Proposed Listing 102.02—Loss of Visual We have consulted with the Office of
Kinetic Perimetry.’’ Final Report: SSA–
Acuity Management and Budget (OMB) and
RFP–98–3537, n.d.
This proposed listing corresponds to determined that these proposed rules
National Research Council,
current listing 102.02, ‘‘Impairments of meet the requirements for a significant
Committee on Vision, Commission on
visual acuity.’’ We are not proposing regulatory action under Executive Order
Behavioral and Social Sciences and
any changes to current listing 102.02A. 12866, as amended by Executive Order
Education. Measurement of Visual Field
We use current listing 102.02B to 13258. Thus, they were subject to OMB
and Visual Acuity for Disability
evaluate visual acuity impairments in review.
Determination. Washington, DC:
children below 3 years of age at the time Regulatory Flexibility Act National Academy Press, 1994.
of adjudication. We propose to remove National Research Council,
the age criterion and instead to provide We certify that these proposed rules
would not have a significant economic Committee on Disability Determination
that the listing will be used to evaluate for Individuals With Visual
a visual acuity disorder in any child impact on a substantial number of small
entities because they would affect only Impairments. Visual Impairments:
who is unable to participate in testing Determining Eligibility for Social
using Snellen methodology or other individuals. Thus, a regulatory
flexibility analysis as provided in the Security Benefits. Washington, DC:
comparable visual acuity testing, and National Academy Press, 2002
who has specified abnormal anatomical Regulatory Flexibility Act, as amended,
is not required. (available at http://www.nap.edu/
findings. catalog/10320.html?se_side).
The criteria in current listing 102.02B Paperwork Reduction Act American Medical Association.
are all examples of abnormal anatomical Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent
These proposed rules contain
findings observable during a clinical eye Impairment. Fifth edition, AMA Press,
reporting requirements at 2.00A and
examination. When present in the better 2001:252, 287–295.
102.00A. The public reporting burden is
eye, these abnormal anatomical findings These references are included in the
accounted for in the Information
would be expected to result in the rulemaking record for these proposed
Collection Requests for the various
absence of fixation and visual following rules and are available for inspection by
forms that the public uses to submit
behavior, and would indicate a visual interested individuals by making
information to SSA. Consequently, a 1-
acuity of 20/200 or worse. Rather than arrangements with the contact person
hour placeholder burden is being
list each type of abnormal anatomical shown in this preamble.
assigned to the specific reporting
finding, we propose to combine the
requirement(s) contained in these rules. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
current criteria into a general category of Program Nos. 96.001, Social Security-
We are seeking clearance of the burden
abnormal physical findings in proposed Disability Insurance; 96.002, Social Security-
referenced in these rules because they
listing 102.02B1. Proposed listings Retirement Insurance; 96.004, Social
were not considered during the
102.02B2 and 102.02B3 would add Security-Survivors Insurance; and 96.006,
clearance of the forms. An Information
criteria for impairments that generally Supplemental Security Income)
Collection Request has been submitted
are not observable during a clinical eye
to OMB. We are soliciting comments on List of Subjects in 20 CFR Part 404
examination, but are diagnosed based
the burden estimate; the need for the
on abnormal neuroimaging or an Administrative practice and
information; its practical utility; ways to
abnormal electroretinogram. procedure, Blind, Disability benefits,
enhance its quality, utility and clarity;
Clarity of These Proposed Rules and on ways to minimize the burden on Old-Age, Survivors, and Disability
respondents, including the use of Insurance, Reporting and recordkeeping
Executive Order 12866, as amended
automated collection techniques or requirements, Social Security.
by Executive Order 13258, requires each
agency to write all rules in plain other forms of information technology. Dated: May 11, 2005.
language. In addition to your Comments should be submitted or faxed Jo Anne B. Barnhart,
substantive comments on these to the Office of Management and Budget Commissioner of Social Security.
proposed rules, we invite your and to the Social Security For the reasons set forth in the
comments on how to make these Administration at the following preamble, we propose to amend subpart
proposed rules easier to understand. For addresses/numbers: Office of P of part 404 of chapter III of title 20 of
example: Management and Budget, Attn: Desk the Code of Federal Regulations as set
• Have we organized the material to Officer for SSA, Fax Number: 202–395– forth below:
suit your needs? 6974. Social Security Administration,
• Are the requirements in the rules Attn: SSA Reports Clearance Officer, PART 404—FEDERAL OLD-AGE,
clearly stated? Rm. 1338 Annex Building, 6401 SURVIVORS AND DISABILITY
• Do the rules contain technical Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD INSURANCE (1950-)
language or jargon that is not clear? 21235–6401, Fax Number: 410–965–
• Would a different format (grouping 6400. 1. The authority citation for subpart P
and order of sections, use of headings, Comments can be received for up to of part 404 continues to read as follows:
paragraphing) make the rules easier to 60 days after publication of this notice Authority: Secs. 202, 205(a), (b), and (d)-
understand? and will be most useful if received (h), 216(i), 221(a) and (i), 222(c), 223, 225,
and 702(a)(5) of the Social Security Act (42 considered as having visual acuity of 20/200 determine whether your loss of visual acuity
U.S.C. 402, 405(a), (b), and (d)-(h), 416(i), or less. You have statutory blindness if your satisfies the criteria in 2.02.
421(a) and (i), 422(c), 423, 425, and visual disorder meets the criteria of 2.02 or
902(a)(5)); sec. 211(b), Pub. L. 104–193, 110 2.03A. 6. How Do We Measure Visual Fields?
Stat. 2105, 2189. a. Testing for visual fields.
3. What Evidence Do We Need To Establish
Statutory Blindness Under Title XVI? i. We generally need visual field testing
Appendix 1 to Subpart P of Part 404— when you have a visual disorder that could
[Amended] For title XVI, the only evidence we need result in visual field loss, such as glaucoma,
2. Appendix 1 to subpart P of part 404 to establish statutory blindness is evidence retinitis pigmentosa, macular edema, or optic
showing that your visual acuity or visual neuropathy, or when you display behaviors
is amended as follows: field, in the better eye, meets the criteria in
a. Item 3 of the introductory text that suggest a visual field loss.
A2 above, provided that those measurements
before part A of appendix 1 is amended ii. When we need to measure the extent of
are consistent with the other evidence in
by revising the expiration date. your case record. We do not need to your visual field loss, we will use visual field
b. Section 2.00A of part A of appendix document the cause of your blindness. Also, measurements obtained with an automated
1 is revised. there is no duration requirement for statutory static threshold perimetry test performed on
c. Section 2.00C is added to part A of blindness under title XVI (see §§ 416.981 and a perimeter, like the Humphrey Field
appendix 1. 416.983). Analyzer, that satisfies all of the following
d. Listing 2.02 of part A of appendix requirements:
4. What Evidence Do We Need To Evaluate A. The perimeter must use optical
1 is amended by revising the heading. Visual Disorders, Including Those That projection to generate the test stimuli.
e. Listing 2.03 of part A of appendix Result in Statutory Blindness Under Title II? B. The perimeter must have an internal
1 is revised. a. To evaluate your visual disorder, we normative database for automatically
f. Listing 2.04 of part A of appendix usually need a report of an eye examination comparing your performance with that of the
1 is revised. that includes measurements of the best- general population.
g. The reservation for listing 2.05 is corrected visual acuity or the extent of the C. The perimeter must have a statistical
removed. visual fields, as appropriate. If there is a loss analysis package that is able to calculate
h. Listing 2.06 of part A of appendix of visual acuity or visual fields, the cause of visual field indices, particularly mean
1 is removed the loss must be documented. A standard eye deviation.
i. Tables 1 and 2 of section 2.01 of examination will usually reveal the cause of D. The perimeter must demonstrate the
part A of appendix 1 are revised. any visual acuity loss. An eye examination ability to correctly detect visual field loss and
j. Section 102.00A of part B of can also reveal the cause of some types of correctly identify normal visual fields.
appendix 1 is revised. visual field deficits. If the eye examination
E. The perimeter must demonstrate good
k. Section 102.00C is added to part B does not reveal the cause of the visual loss,
test-retest reliability.
we will request the information that was
of appendix. F. The perimeter must have undergone
used to establish the presence of the visual
l. Listing 102.02 of part B of appendix clinical validation studies by three or more
disorder.
1 is revised. b. A diagnosis of cortical blindness independent laboratories with results
m. Listing 102.03 is added to part B (blindness due to a brain lesion) must be published in peer-reviewed ophthalmic
of appendix 1. confirmed by documentation of the journals.
n. Listing 102.04 is added to part B of catastrophic event, such as a cardiac arrest or iii. The test must use a white size III
appendix 1. stroke, that caused the brain lesion. If Goldmann stimulus and a 31.5 apostilb (10
o. Tables 1 and 2 are added to section neuroimaging was performed, we will cd/m2) white background. The stimuli
102.01 of part B of appendix 1. request a copy of the report or other medical locations must be no more than 6 degrees
The revised text is set forth as follows: evidence that describes the findings in the apart horizontally or vertically.
report. Measurements must be reported on standard
Appendix 1 to Subpart P of Part 404— c. If your visual disorder does not satisfy charts and include a description of the size
Listing of Impairments the criteria in 2.02, 2.03, or 2.04, we will also and intensity of the test stimulus.
request a description of how your visual iv. To determine statutory blindness, we
* * * * *
3. Special Senses and Speech (2.00 and disorder impacts your ability to function. need a test that measures the central 24 to 30
102.00): (Insert date 8 years from the effective degrees of the visual field; that is, the area
5. How Do We Measure Best-Corrected Visual
date of the final rules). measuring 24 to 30 degrees from the point of
Acuity?
fixation. Acceptable tests include the
* * * * * a. Testing for visual acuity. When we need Humphrey 30–2 or 24–2 tests.
Part A to measure your best-corrected visual acuity, v. To determine if the criterion in 2.03B is
we will use visual acuity testing that was met, we need a test performed on a
* * * * * carried out using Snellen methodology or any Humphrey field analyzer that measures the
2.00 SPECIAL SENSES AND SPEECH other testing methodology that is comparable central 30 degrees of the visual field. (We can
to Snellen methodology. also use comparable results from other
A. How do we evaluate visual disorders? b. Determining best-corrected visual acuity. acceptable perimeters, for example, a mean
1. What are visual disorders? Visual i. Best-corrected visual acuity is the
defect of 22 on an acceptable Octopus test,
disorders are abnormalities of the eye, the optimal visual acuity attainable with the use
to determine that the criterion in 2.03B is
optic nerve, the optic tracts, or the brain that of a corrective lens. In some instances, this
met.) We cannot use tests that do not
may cause a loss of visual acuity or visual assessment may be performed using a
fields. A loss of visual acuity limits your specialized lens; for example, a contact lens. measure the central 30 degrees of the visual
ability to distinguish detail, read, or do fine We will use the visual acuity measurements field, such as the Humphrey 24–2 test, to
work. A loss of visual fields limits your obtained with a specialized lens only if you determine if your impairment meets or
ability to perceive visual stimuli in the have demonstrated the ability to use the medically equals 2.03B.
peripheral extent of vision. specialized lens on a sustained basis. vi. We measure the extent of visual field
2. What is statutory blindness? Statutory However, we will not use visual acuity loss by determining the portion of the visual
blindness is blindness as defined in the measurements obtained with telescopic field in which you can see a white III4e
Social Security Act (the Act). The Act defines lenses because they significantly reduce the stimulus. As indicated above, the ‘‘III’’ refers
blindness as visual acuity of 20/200 or less visual field. Additionally, we will not use the to the standard Goldmann test stimulus size
in the better eye with the use of a correcting results of visual evoked response testing or III. The ‘‘4e’’ refers to the standard Goldmann
lens. The Act also provides that an eye that pinhole testing to determine best-corrected intensity filters used to determine the
has a visual field limitation such that the visual acuity. intensity of the stimulus.
widest diameter of the visual field subtends ii. We will use the best-corrected visual vii. In automated static threshold
an angle no greater than 20 degrees is acuity for distance in the better eye when we perimetry, the intensity of the stimulus
varies. The intensity of the stimulus is may be used to correct visual acuity during subtract the length of any scotoma, other than
expressed in decibels (dB). We need to the visual field examination in order to the normal blind spot, from the overall length
determine the dB level that corresponds to a obtain the most accurate visual field of any diameter on which it falls.
4e intensity for the particular perimeter being measurements. For this single purpose, you * * * * *
used. We will then use the dB printout to do not need to demonstrate that you have the
determine which points would be seen at a ability to use the contact or perimetric lenses C. How Do We Evaluate Impairments That Do
4e intensity level. For example, in Humphrey on a sustained basis. Not Meet One of the Special Senses and
perimeters, a 10 dB stimulus is equivalent to Speech Listings?
a 4e stimulus. A dB level that is higher than 7. How Do We Calculate Visual Efficiency?
1. These listings are only examples of
10 represents a dimmer stimulus, while a dB a. Visual acuity efficiency. We use the
percentage shown in Table 1 that common special senses and speech disorders
level that is lower than 10 represents a
corresponds to the best-corrected visual that we consider severe enough to prevent an
brighter stimulus. Therefore, for tests
acuity for distance in the better eye. individual from doing any gainful activity. If
performed on Humphrey perimeters, any
point seen at 10 dB or higher is a point that b. Visual field efficiency. We use kinetic your impairment(s) does not meet the criteria
would be seen with a 4e stimulus. perimetry to calculate visual field efficiency of any of these listings, we must also
viii. We can also use visual field by adding the number of degrees seen along consider whether you have an impairment(s)
measurements obtained using kinetic the eight principal meridians in the better that satisfies the criteria of a listing in
perimetry, such as the Humphrey ‘‘SSA Test eye and dividing by 500. (See Table 2.) another body system.
Kinetic’’ or Goldmann perimetry. The test c. Visual efficiency. We calculate the 2. If you have a medically determinable
must use a white III4e stimulus projected on percent of visual efficiency by multiplying impairment(s) that does not meet a listing,
a white 31.5 apostilb (10 cd/m2) background. the visual acuity efficiency by the visual field we will determine whether the impairment(s)
In automated kinetic tests, such as the efficiency. medically equals a listing. (See §§ 404.1526
Humphrey ‘‘SSA Test Kinetic,’’ testing along and 416.926.) If you have an impairment(s)
8. How Do We Evaluate Specific Visual that does not meet or medically equal a
a meridian stops when you see the stimulus.
Problems?
If we need additional information because listing, you may or may not have the residual
your visual disorder has progressed to the a. Statutory blindness. Most test charts that functional capacity to engage in substantial
point where it is likely to result in a use Snellen methodology do not measure gainful activity. Therefore, we proceed to the
significant limitation in the central visual visual acuity between 20/100 and 20/200. fourth, and if necessary, the fifth steps of the
field, such as a scotoma, we will supplement Newer test charts, such as the Bailey-Lovie or sequential evaluation process in §§ 404.1520
the automated kinetic perimetry with the the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy and 416.920. When we decide whether you
results of a Humphrey 30–2 or comparable Study (ETDRS), do measure visual acuity continue to be disabled, we use the rules in
test. between 20/100 and 20/200. If your visual §§ 404.1594, 416.994, or 416.994a as
ix. We will not use the results of visual acuity is measured with one of these newer appropriate.
field screening tests, such as confrontation charts, and you cannot read any of the letters 2.01 Category of Impairments, Special
tests, tangent screen tests, or automated static on the 20/100 line, we will determine that
Senses and Speech
screening tests, to determine that your you have statutory blindness based on a
2.02 Loss of visual acuity. Remaining
impairment meets or medically equals a visual acuity of 20/200 or less. Regardless of
vision in the better eye after best correction
listing or to evaluate your residual functional the type of test chart used, you do not have
is 20/200 or less.
capacity. We will use normal results from statutory blindness if you can read at least
one letter on the 20/100 line. 2.03 Contraction of the visual field in the
visual field screening tests to determine better eye, with:
whether the impact of your visual disorder b. Blepharospasm. This movement
disorder is characterized by repetitive, A. The widest diameter subtending an
on your visual field is severe when these test
involuntary, bilateral eye blinking. It angle no greater than 20 degrees;
results are consistent with the other evidence
in your case record. We will not consider generally responds to therapy. When therapy OR
normal test results to be consistent with the is not effective, we will evaluate this disorder B. A mean deviation of ¥22 or worse,
other evidence if either of the following on the basis of clinical observations or visual determined by automated static threshold
applies: behaviors. If you have this disorder, you may perimetry as described in 2.00A6a(v);
A. The clinical findings indicate that your have measurable visual acuities and visual OR
visual disorder has progressed to the point fields that do not satisfy the criteria of 2.02
or 2.03. However, we must consider how the C. A visual field efficiency of 20 percent
that it is likely to cause visual field loss.
B. You have a history of an operative involuntary blinking affects your ability to or less as determined by kinetic perimetry
procedure for retinal detachment. maintain the measured visual acuities and (see 2.00A7b).
b. Use of corrective lenses. You must not visual fields over time. 2.04 Loss of visual efficiency. Visual
wear eyeglasses during the visual field c. Scotoma. A scotoma is a non-seeing area efficiency of the better eye of 20 percent or
examination because they limit your field of in the visual field surrounded by a seeing less after best correction (see 2.00A7c).
vision. Contact lenses or perimetric lenses area. When we measure the visual field, we * * * * *
TABLE 1.—PERCENTAGE OF VISUAL ACUITY EFFICIENCY CORRESPONDING TO THE BEST-CORRECTED VISUAL ACUITY
MEASUREMENT FOR DISTANCE IN THE BETTER EYE
Snellen Percent visual acuity efficiency
English Metric Phakic or Pseudophakic
20/16 6/5 100

20/20 6/6 100
20/25 6/7.5 95
20/32 6/10 90
20/40 6/12 85
20/50 6/15 75
20/64 6/20 65
20/80 6/24 60
20/100 6/30 50
Table 2.—Chart of Visual Fields
1. The diagram of the right eye illustrates correcting lens. The Act also provides that an visual field deficits. If the eye examination
the extent of a normal visual field as eye that has a visual field limitation such that does not reveal the cause of the visual loss,
measured with a III4e stimulus. The sum of the widest diameter of the visual field we will request the information that was
the eight principal meridians of this field is subtends an angle no greater than 20 degrees used to establish the presence of the visual
500 degrees. is considered as having visual acuity of 20/ disorder.
2. The diagram of the left eye illustrates a 200 or less. You have statutory blindness if b. A diagnosis of cortical blindness
visual field contracted to 30 degrees in two your visual disorder meets the criteria of (blindness due to a brain lesion) must be
meridians and to 20 degrees in the remaining 102.02A, 102.02B, or 102.03A. confirmed by documentation of the
six meridians. The percent of visual field catastrophic event, such as a cardiac arrest or
efficiency of this field is: (2 × 30) + (6 × 20) 3. What Evidence Do We Need To Establish near drowning, that caused the brain lesion.
= 180 ÷ 500 = 0.36 or 36 percent visual field Statutory Blindness Under Title XVI? If neuroimaging was performed, we will
efficiency. For title XVI, the only evidence we need request a copy of the report or other medical
* * * * * to establish statutory blindness is evidence evidence that describes the findings in the
showing that your visual acuity or visual report.
Part B field, in the better eye, meets the criteria in c. If your visual disorder does not satisfy
* * * * * A2 above, provided that those measurements the criteria in 102.02, 102.03, or 102.04, we
are consistent with the other evidence in will also request a description of how your
102.00 SPECIAL SENSES AND SPEECH your case record. We do not need to visual disorder impacts your ability to
A. How Do We Evaluate Visual Disorders? document the cause of your blindness. Also, function.
there is no duration requirement for statutory
1. What Are Visual Disorders? blindness under title XVI (see §§ 416.981 and 5. How Do We Measure Best-Corrected Visual
Visual disorders are abnormalities of the 416.983). Acuity?
eye, the optic nerve, the optic tracts, or the a. Testing for visual acuity.
4. What Evidence Do We Need To Evaluate i. When we need to measure your best-
brain that may cause a loss of visual acuity
Visual Disorders, Including Those That corrected visual acuity, we will use visual
or visual fields. A loss of visual acuity limits
your ability to distinguish detail, read, do Result in Statutory Blindness Under Title II? acuity testing that was carried out using
fine work, or perform other age-appropriate a. To evaluate your visual disorder, we Snellen methodology or any other testing
activities. A loss of visual fields limits your usually need a report of an eye examination methodology that is comparable to Snellen
ability to perceive visual stimuli in the that includes measurements of the best- methodology.
peripheral extent of vision. corrected visual acuity or the extent of the ii. We consider tests such as the Landolt
visual fields, as appropriate. If there is a loss C test or the tumbling-E test, which are used
2. What Is Statutory Blindness? of visual acuity or visual fields, the cause of to evaluate young children who are unable to
Statutory blindness is blindness as defined the loss must be documented. A standard eye participate in testing using Snellen
in the Social Security Act (the Act). The Act examination will usually reveal the cause of methodology, to be comparable to testing
defines blindness as visual acuity of 20/200 any visual acuity loss. An eye examination using Snellen methodology. These alternate
EP17AU05.000</GPH>
or less in the better eye with the use of a can also reveal the cause of some types of methods for measuring visual acuity should
be performed by specialists with expertise in degrees of the visual field; that is, the area B. You have a history of an operative
assessment of childhood vision. measuring 24 to 30 degrees from the point of procedure for retinal detachment.
iii. If you are unable to participate in fixation. Acceptable tests include the b. Use of corrective lenses. You must not
testing using Snellen methodology or other Humphrey 30–2 or 24–2 tests. wear eyeglasses during the visual field
comparable testing, we will consider your v. To determine if the criterion in 102.03B examination because they limit your field of
fixation and visual following behavior. If is met, we need a test performed on a vision. Contact lenses or perimetric lenses
both these behaviors are absent, we will Humphrey field analyzer that measures the may be used to correct visual acuity during
consider the anatomical findings or the central 30 degrees of the visual field. (We can the visual field examination in order to
results of neuroimaging when this testing has also use comparable results from other obtain the most accurate visual field
been performed. acceptable perimeters, for example, a mean measurements. For this single purpose, you
b. Determining best-corrected visual acuity. defect of 22 on an acceptable Octopus test, do not need to demonstrate that you have the
i. Best-corrected visual acuity is the to determine that the criterion in 102.03B is ability to use the contact or perimetric lenses
optimal visual acuity attainable with the use met.) We cannot use tests that do not on a sustained basis.
of a corrective lens. In some instances, this measure the central 30 degrees of the visual
assessment may be performed using a field, such as the Humphrey 24–2 test, to 7. How Do We Calculate Visual Efficiency?
specialized lens; for example, a contact lens. determine if your impairment meets or a. Visual acuity efficiency. We use the
We will use the visual acuity measurements medically equals 102.03B. percentage shown in Table 1 that
obtained with a specialized lens only if you vi. We measure the extent of visual field corresponds to the best-corrected visual
have demonstrated the ability to use the loss by determining the portion of the visual acuity for distance in the better eye.
specialized lens on a sustained basis. field in which you can see a white III4e b. Visual field efficiency. We use kinetic
However, we will not use visual acuity stimulus. As indicated above, the ‘‘III’’ refers perimetry to calculate visual field efficiency
measurements obtained with telescopic to the standard Goldmann test stimulus size by adding the number of degrees seen along
lenses because they significantly reduce the III. The ‘‘4e’’ refers to the standard Goldmann the eight principal meridians in the better
visual field. Additionally, we will not use the intensity filters used to determine the eye and dividing by 500. (See Table 2.)
results of visual evoked response testing or intensity of the stimulus. c. Visual efficiency. We calculate the
pinhole testing to determine best-corrected vii. In automated static threshold percent of visual efficiency by multiplying
visual acuity. perimetry, the intensity of the stimulus the visual acuity efficiency by the visual field
ii. We will use the best-corrected visual varies. The intensity of the stimulus is efficiency.
acuity for distance in the better eye when we expressed in decibels (dB). We need to
determine whether your loss of visual acuity 8. How Do We Evaluate Specific Visual
determine the dB level that corresponds to a
satisfies the criteria in 102.02A. Problems?
4e intensity for the particular perimeter being
6. How Do We Measure Visual Fields? used. We will then use the dB printout to a. Statutory blindness. Most test charts that
determine which points would be seen at a use Snellen methodology do not measure
a. Testing for visual fields. visual acuity between 20/100 and 20/200.
4e intensity level. For example, in Humphrey
i. We generally need visual field testing Newer test charts, such as the Bailey-Lovie or
perimeters, a 10 dB stimulus is equivalent to
when you have a visual disorder that could the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy
a 4e stimulus. A dB level that is higher than
result in visual field loss, such as glaucoma, Study (ETDRS), do measure visual acuity
retinitis pigmentosa, or optic neuropathy, or 10 represents a dimmer stimulus, while a dB
level that is lower than 10 represents a between 20/100 and 20/200. If your visual
when you display behaviors that suggest a acuity is measured with one of these newer
visual field loss. brighter stimulus. Therefore, for tests
performed on Humphrey perimeters, any charts, and you cannot read any of the letters
ii. When we need to measure the extent of on the 20/100 line, we will determine that
your visual field loss, we will use visual field point seen at 10 dB or higher is a point that
would be seen with a 4e stimulus. you have statutory blindness based on a
measurements obtained with an automated visual acuity of 20/200 or less. Regardless of
static threshold perimetry test performed on viii. We can also use visual field
measurements obtained using kinetic the type of test used, you do not have
a perimeter, like the Humphrey Field statutory blindness if you can read at least
Analyzer, that satisfies all of the following perimetry, such as the Humphrey ‘‘SSA Test
Kinetic’’ or Goldmann perimetry. The test one letter on the 20/100 line.
requirements: b. Blepharospasm. This movement
A. The perimeter must use optical must use a white III4e stimulus projected on
a white 31.5 apostilb (10 cd/m2) background. disorder is characterized by repetitive,
projection to generate the test stimuli.
In automated kinetic tests, such as the involuntary, bilateral eye blinking. It
B. The perimeter must have an internal
Humphrey ‘‘SSA Test Kinetic,’’ testing along generally responds to therapy. When therapy
normative database for automatically
a meridian stops when you see the stimulus. is not effective, we will evaluate this disorder
comparing your performance with that of the
If we need additional information because on the basis of clinical observations or visual
general population.
your visual disorder has progressed to the behaviors. If you have this disorder, you may
C. The perimeter must have a statistical
point where it is likely to result in a have measurable visual acuities and visual
analysis package that is able to calculate
significant limitation in the central visual fields that do not satisfy the criteria of 102.02
visual field indices, particularly mean
field, such as a scotoma, we will supplement or 102.03. However, we must consider how
deviation.
D. The perimeter must demonstrate the the automated kinetic perimetry with the the involuntary blinking affects your ability
ability to correctly detect visual field loss and results of a Humphrey 30–2 or comparable to maintain the measured visual acuities and
correctly identify normal visual fields. test. visual fields over time.
E. The perimeter must demonstrate good ix. We will not use the results of visual c. Scotoma. A scotoma is a non-seeing area
test-retest reliability. field screening tests, such as confrontation in the visual field surrounded by a seeing
F. The perimeter must have undergone tests, tangent screen tests, or automated static area. When we measure the visual field, we
clinical validation studies by three or more screening tests, to determine that your subtract the length of any scotoma, other than
independent laboratories with results impairment meets or medically equals a the normal blind spot, from the overall length
published in peer-reviewed ophthalmic listing, or functionally equals the listings. We of any diameter on which it falls.
journals. will use normal results from visual field * * * * *
iii. The test must use a white size III screening tests to determine whether the
Goldmann stimulus and a 31.5 apostilb (10 impact of your visual disorder on your visual C. How Do We Evaluate Impairments That Do
cd/m2) white background. The stimuli field is severe when these test results are Not Meet One of the Special Senses and
locations must be no more than 6 degrees consistent with the other evidence in your Speech Listings?
apart horizontally or vertically. case record. We will not consider normal test 1. These listings are only examples of
Measurements must be reported on standard results to be consistent with the other common special senses and speech disorders
charts and include a description of the size evidence if either of the following applies: that we consider severe enough to result in
and intensity of the test stimulus. A. The clinical findings indicate that your marked and severe functional limitations. If
iv. To determine statutory blindness, we visual disorder has progressed to the point your impairment(s) does not meet the criteria
need a test that measures the central 24 to 30 that it is likely to cause visual field loss. of any of these listings, we must also
consider whether you have an impairment(s) B. An inability to participate in testing 102.03 Contraction of the visual field in
that satisfies the criteria of a listing in using Snellen methodology or other the better eye, with:
another body system. comparable visual acuity testing and clinical A. The widest diameter subtending an
2. If you have a medically determinable findings that fixation and visual following angle no greater than 20 degrees;
impairment(s) that does not meet a listing, behavior are absent in the better eye, and: OR
we will determine whether the impairment(s)
1. Abnormal anatomical findings B. A mean deviation of -22 or worse,
medically equals a listing or functionally
equals the listings. (See §§ 404.1526, 416.926, indicating a visual acuity of 20/200 or worse determined by automated static threshold
and 416.926a.) If you are receiving title XVI in the better eye; or perimetry as described in 102.00A6a(v);
payments, we use the rules in § 416.994a 2. Abnormal neuroimaging documenting OR
when we decide whether you continue to be damage to the cerebral cortex which would C. A visual field efficiency of 20 percent
disabled. be expected to prevent the development, in or less as determined by kinetic perimetry
* * * * * the better eye, of a visual acuity better than (see 102.00A7b).
102.02 Loss of visual acuity. 20/200; or 102.04 Loss of visual efficiency. Visual
A. Remaining vision in the better eye after 3. Abnormal electroretinogram efficiency of the better eye of 20 percent or
best correction is 20/200 or less; documenting the presence of Leber’s less after best correction (see 102.00A7c).
OR congenital amaurosis or achromatopsia. * * * * *
TABLE 1.—PERCENTAGE OF VISUAL ACUITY EFFICIENCY CORRESPONDING TO THE BEST-CORRECTED VISUAL ACUITY
MEASUREMENT FOR DISTANCE IN THE BETTER EYE.
Snellen Percent visual acuity efficiency
English Metric Phakic or Pseudophakic
20/16 6/5 100

20/20 6/6 100
20/25 6/7.5 95
20/32 6/10 90
20/40 6/12 85
20/50 6/15 75
20/64 6/20 65
20/80 6/24 60
20/100 6/30 50
Table 2.—Chart of Visual Fields
Ep17AU05.001</GPH>
1. The diagram of the right eye illustrates Request for Comments regulation during the summer of 1996.
the extent of a normal visual field as The Coast Guard did not receive any
measured with a III4e stimulus. The sum of We encourage you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting comments, and W-DOT did not report
the eight principal meridians of this field is any adverse comments, concerning the
500 degrees. comments and related material. If you
2. The diagram of the left eye illustrates a do so, please include your name and temporary deviation.
visual field contracted to 30 degrees in two address, identify the docket number for In February 1997, the Coast Guard
meridians and to 20 degrees in the remaining this rulemaking (CGD09–05–080), published in the Federal Register an
six meridians. The percent of visual field indicate the specific section of this Interim rule with request for comments
efficiency of this field is: (2x30) + (6x20) = document to which each comment (62 FR 6875, February 14, 1997), which
180 ÷ 500 = 0.36 or 36 percent visual field revised the operating regulation to
efficiency.
applies, and give the reason for each
comment. Please submit all comments require the bridge to open for
* * * * * and related material in an unbound recreational vessels only on the hour, 24
[FR Doc. 05–16218 Filed 8–16–05; 8:45 am] format, no larger than 81⁄2 by 11 inches, hours a day, 7 days a week, between
BILLING CODE 4191–02–P suitable for copying. If you would like March 15 and December 31 of each year.
to know they reached us, please enclose The requirement for notice at least 12
a stamped, self-addressed postcard or hours in advance during the winter
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND envelope. We will consider all months remained unchanged. It was
SECURITY comments and material received during intended that the operating
the comment period. We may change requirements applicable between 6 p.m.
Coast Guard and 8 a.m., and the provisions related to
this proposed rule in view of them.
commercial vessels and vessels seeking
33 CFR Part 117 Public Meeting shelter from severe weather, located at
We do not now plan to hold a public 33 CFR 117.1101(a)(2), (a)(3), and (b),
[CGD09–05–080] meeting. But you may submit a request were to be removed.
for a meeting by writing to Commander Although the removal of those sub-
RIN 1625–AA09 (obr), Ninth Coast Guard District, at the paragraphs was not codified, the bridge
address under ADDRESSES explaining has operated according to the provisions
Drawbridge Operation Regulations; why one would be beneficial. If we of the Interim Rule since the rule’s
Sturgeon Bay Ship Canal, Sturgeon determine that one would aid this effective date on March 17, 1997. No
Bay, WI rulemaking, we will hold one at a time negative comments concerning this
and place announced by a later notice operating schedule have been received.
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
in the Federal Register. W–DOT has now requested that the
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
Background and Purpose 12-hour advance notice requirement for
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to winter operations be changed from
The Michigan Street Bridge at mile
revise the operating regulations for the January 1 through March 14 of each year
4.3 over Sturgeon Bay Ship Canal is a
Michigan Street Bridge and establish to December 1 through March 14 of each
single-leaf bascule bridge that provides
permanent winter operating hours for year. The bridge opening logs provided
a vertical clearance of 14 feet in the
the Bayview Bridge, both in Sturgeon by W–DOT showed a large number of
lowered position. On July 11, 1996, the
Bay, WI. The proposed rule is expected openings during the month of December
bridge owner, the Wisconsin
to reflect the need for bridge openings in 2002, 2003, and 2004, requiring the
Department of Transportation (W–DOT),
during winter months and still provide bridge to maintain full-time bridge
requested that the bridge be required to
for the reasonable needs of navigation. tenders throughout the month of
open for recreational vessels only on the
December. Based on these records, the
DATES: Comments and related material hour, 24 hours a day, 7 days a week,
Coast Guard concluded that W–DOT’s
must reach the Coast Guard on or before between March 15 and December 31 of
requested change provides for the
October 3, 2005. each year in order to reduce wear on the
reasonable needs of navigation.
ADDRESSES: You may mail comments
bridge. At that time, the operating
regulation governing the bridge This proposed rule would make final
and related material to Commander the provisions of the Interim Rule,
(obr), Ninth Coast Guard District, 1240 provided: From March 15 to December
31 of each year, the bridge was required which require the Michigan Street
E. 9th Street, Room 2025, Cleveland, OH Bridge to open between March 15 and
44199–2060. The Ninth Coast Guard to open on the hour between 8 a.m. and
6 p.m. for recreational vessels. Between December 31 of each year for
District maintains the public docket for recreational vessels on the hour, 24
this rulemaking. Comments and 6 p.m. and 10 p.m., the draw was
required to open for recreational vessels hours a day, and on signal if more than
material received from the public, as 20 vessels have accumulated at the
well as documents indicated in this no more than on the hour and half-hour,
and the bridge opened on signal from 10 bridge, or if vessels are seeking shelter
preamble as being available in the from severe weather. From January 1
docket, will become part of this docket p.m. to 8 a.m. From January 1 to March
14 of each year, the bridge was required through March 14 of each year, the
and will be available for inspection or bridge would continue to open for
copying at Commander (obr), Ninth to open on signal if notice was given at
least 12 hours in advance of a vessel’s vessels if notice is provided at least 12
Coast Guard District between 7 a.m. and hours in advance.
3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except intended time of passage through the
Federal holidays. draw. Throughout the year, the draw There is no current specific
was required to open on signal for drawbridge regulation for the Bayview
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Scot commercial vessels and all vessels (State Route 42/57) Bridge, mile 3.0 over
M. Striffler, Bridge Management seeking shelter from severe weather. Sturgeon Bay Ship Canal. The Bayview
Specialist, Ninth Coast Guard District, at To test the requested schedule Bridge is a twin-leaf bascule drawbridge
(216) 902–6087. change, the Coast Guard authorized a that provides a vertical clearance of 42
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: temporary deviation from the existing feet when in the lowered position. The

Proposed Rule: Social Security Benefits: Federal Old Age, Survivors, and Disability Insurance&#8212 Visual Disorders Evaluation Criteria Revision

Загружено:

Сведения о документе

Оригинальное название

Авторское право

Доступные форматы

Поделиться этим документом

Поделиться или встроить документ

Параметры публикации

Этот документ был вам полезен?

Это неприемлемый материал?

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

Proposed Rule: Social Security Benefits: Federal Old Age, Survivors, and Disability Insurance&#8212 Visual Disorders Evaluation Criteria Revision

Загружено:

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

48342 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No.

158 / Wednesday, August 17, 2005 / Proposed Rules

TABLE 1.—PREVIOUS REVISIONS OF THE SERVICE BULLETIN

145–30–0028 .............................................................................. 04 March 13, 2001.

TABLE 2.—SERVICE BULLETINS FOR UPGRADING FADEC ASSEMBLIES

Disability means you have a medically determinable impairment(s) as

title II ................................................ an adult or a child .......................... the inability to do any SGA.

English Metric Phakic or Pseudophakic

20/16 6/5 100

Table 2.—Chart of Visual Fields

English Metric Phakic or Pseudophakic

20/16 6/5 100

Table 2.—Chart of Visual Fields

Вам также может понравиться