ISSUE: Is a Mosque constitutionally permissible to exist within Australia?

There will always be people who will have issues with the way others lives their lives, but to me as a
CONSTITUTIONALIST my first concern is what is constitutionally appropriate.
HANSARD 17-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates Mr. DEAKIN.- QUOTE What a charter of liberty is
embraced within this Bill-of political liberty and religious liberty-the liberty and the means to achieve all to
which men in these days can reasonably aspire. A charter of liberty is enshrined in this Constitution, which is
also a charter of peace-of peace, order, and good government for the whole of the peoples whom it will
embrace and unite. END QUOTE As such those who are Muslims are entitled to practice their faith.
Hansard 7-2-1898 Constitution Convention Debates (Official Record of the Debates of the National Australasian
Convention) Mr. HIGGINS.- QUOTE "religion is ever a matter between God and the individual; END QUOTE
We then have to consider for example:
http://www.wernercairns.com/2015/03/why-oppose-building-of-mosque.html QUOTE What is a mosque? It is
vitally important to understand what a mosque represents in Islam. A mosque is not like a church or a temple, it is
much more than a place for Muslims to simply worship their God (Allah). Mosques are modelled on the first
mosque established by Mohammed in Medina which was a seat of government, a command centre, a court, a
military training centre and an arms depot. END QUOTE
http://www.wernercairns.com/2015/03/why-oppose-building-of-mosque.html QUOTE Turkey. The Prime Minister
of Turkey, Recep Tayyip Erdoan, understood the military nature of a mosque when he stated: A mosque is our
barracks, the domes our helmets, minarets our bayonets and the faithful are our soldiers." END QUOTE
In my view the following quotations make it very clear that the purpose and usage of Mosque is within the
legislative powers of the Commonwealth as well as the states to legislate against it, without violating s116.
Hansard 2-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates QUOTE Mr. FRASER (Victoria).-I think that if we give
the right to an infinitesimal minority to come here and indulge in extraordinary practices, under the pretence
that this is a new religion, we may have all the theatres and all the music-halls in Australia open on Sundays.
If that is possible we ought to do what we can to provide against it. END QUOTE
Hansard 7-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates QUOTE Sir EDWARD BRADDON (Tasmania).-I have an
amendment to move on behalf of Tasmania, and also an amendment of my own. The clause we have before us says
that a state shall not make any law prohibiting the free exercise of any religion. It is quite possible that this might
make lawfull practices which would otherwise be strictly prohibited. Take, for instance, the Hindoos. One of their
religious rites is the "suttee," and another is the "churruck,"-one meaning simply murder, and the other
barbarous cruelty, to the devotees who offer themselves for the sacrifice. END QUOTE
Section 114 of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act (1900) A State shall not, without the consent of
the Parliament of the Commonwealth, raise or maintain any naval or military force. Allowing and even funding
(using taxation) a so called religious arms depots to be built surely is not only irresponsible but criminal,
and endangering those residing nearby or elsewhere! Hence, no council/court can permit this, as it cannot
overrule the embedded legal principles of the constitution. It is not the individual right to engage in the Islamic
religion personally that is in question, but the use of a Mosque to exert extremist conduct upon those attending
and/or others that causes the violation of the embedded legal principles of the constitution. Too late for an Iman to
argue this usage should be stopped as it never should have been allowed in the first place. The fact that it was used
for extremist propaganda, etc, makes it clear that this Mosque usage is unconstitutional, this as it also undermines
the legal principles in the (federal) constitution of a governance by elected representatives, etc. Here we have
terrorism legislation in avalanches upon the general community, while unconstitutionally Mosque are allowed to
exist undermining our constitutional principles, rights and protections. What should be understood is that Mosque
are not places of worship for women, and as such not at all a general place of exercise of religion. Hence, to close
down Mosque is not to obstruct a person to exercise their personal faith, but is rather for State and Commonwealth
national security permitted and justified. In my view any bank that directly/indirectly supports Mosque being build,
intended or otherwise, supports extremism/terrorism, and should be held legally accountable for this!

This correspondence is not intended and neither must be perceived to state all issues/details.

Awaiting your response,

G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. (Gerrit)

MAY JUSTICE ALWAYS PREVAIL

(Our name is our motto!)
p1
11-10-2015
G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
Email: admin@inspector-rikati.com. For further details see also my blog at Http://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikati