Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 1

When I was a child,I asked my father a question,..

"is this tree dead or still al


ive?",...my father who was a scientist,hesitated before giving me an answer,..af
ter years,I come to understand that my father's problem,when I asked him my ques
tion,was not in the lack of information,but in the real difficulty of my questio
n,..I read books about biological evolution,and I knew that death was not always
parallel to life,..one book said that the one cell living organism does not kno
w death,..this is easy to understand,..but my point is that when death began to
be parallel to life,it didn't appear in the form that we know it,..it was a very
gradual disintegration,that takes long time,..the tree is a good example for th
at,..my mistake was that I tried to apply the idea of death as we know it,on the
tree.
but the question is,..why does only the higher forms of life experience quick de
ath??
when we study the different levels of life,the relation of the quick death and t
he higher form of life appears very obvious,...and the is a very clear logic beh
ind that.
evolution means gaining higher efficiency,..this can be achieved by several meth
ods,..the most important is the co-operation of the individuals,..and this will
lead to specialization in functions,..which will lead to the need of a leadershi
p to supervise and arrange the co-operation of the individuals,...and so,life fo
rms had to evolute by being multiple cell forms and then create the nerves syste
m,...this increasing centralization leads logically to the sudden death fate.
and as we can see these days,how civilization is trying to resist the collapse b
y more co-operation between the individuals,it is in the same time increasing th
e sharpness of the collapse,...it is its logical price that even biological orga
nisms had to pay it.
now we can understand why the evolution process of civilization had to go throug
h a communication revolution that allowed the individuals to co-operate more eff
iciently,..and why world leaders now are appealing for more co-operation between
them,..it was for sure the only way to resist the collapse,but,by denying the l
ogical price that have to be payed,they are committing a great lie.
lying,on the other hand,is the most efficient way to resist the collapse,..but a
t the highest price,..it is obvious that the burst of the bubble of lies need on
ly few seconds to happen,..the centralization here is in its maximum form,it is
not only the centralization of the mind,..but more than that,by depending on lie
s,we create a center within the mind,..a central ideas,that controls all our oth
er ideas,...and with the collapse of this ideas,the whole mind will collapse,lea
ding to the sudden death of the person,and indeed the sudden death of civilizati
on.
as we can see,..when we try to compare the collapse of our modern civilization w
ith the collapse of the ancient civilizations,we are committing the same mistake
which I had committed when I was a child,when I tried to compare the death of a
tree by the death of upper animals,..as the case of the tree,ancient civilizati
on didn't reach this high degree of individual co-operation and centralization,.
.the tree will only die when nearly all its parts disintegrate individually,..bu
t as the case of upper animals,our modern civilization will collapse very sharpl
y with the collapse of its center,which is the mind,..and the mind will collapse
very sharply with the collapse of its central ideas

Вам также может понравиться