Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
(1) Incorporate the airplane flight manual sup- Within 30 days after July 18, 2005 (the effec- Not applicable.
plement (AFMS) in the airplane flight manual tive date of this AD), unless already done.
with the appropriate revision in the FAA-ap-
proved airplane flight manual (AFM).
(i) The owner/operator holding at least a private
pilot certificate as authorized by section 43.7
of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR
43.7) may do the flight manual changes re-
quirement of this AD.
(ii) Make an entry in the aircraft records show-
ing compliance with this portion of the AD fol-
lowing section 43.9 of the Federal Aviation
Regulations (14 CFR 43.9).
(2) Install placards described in the AFMS ........ Before further flight after incorporating the Follow the MANUAL VALVE Standby Vacuum
AFMS in the FAA-approved airplane flight System AFM SUPPLEMENT, dated Feb-
manual (AFM) required by paragraph (e)(1) ruary 4, 2000.
of this AD.
(3) Upgrade the Model SVS I or SVS IA SVS to Within 1 year after July 18, 2005 (the effective Follow Precise Flight, Inc. Installation Report
the Model VI SVS, install the appropriate date of this AD), unless already done. No. 08074, Standby Vacuum System Model
placards, and add the installation report in- VI Upgrade Kit, dated January 7, 2000.
cluding the instructions for continued air-
worthiness (ICA) to the maintenance sched-
ule for the aircraft.
(4) Do not install any Model SVS I or SVS IA As of July 18, 2005 (the effective date of this Not applicable.
SVS without also doing the actions required AD).
by paragraphs (e)(1), (e)(2) and (e)(3) of this
AD.
May I Request an Alternative Method of view the AD docket, go to the Docket installing a new, improved foam seal
Compliance? Management Facility; U.S. Department of around certain ducts in the forward
(f) You may request a different method of Transportation, 400 Seventh Street, SW., cargo compartment. This AD is
compliance or a different compliance time Nassif Building, Room PL–401, Washington, prompted by the detection of incorrectly
for this AD by following the procedures in 14 DC 20590–001 or on the Internet at http://
dms.dot.gov. The docket number is FAA–
installed smoke barrier seals around the
CFR 39.19. Unless FAA authorizes otherwise, electrical/electronic equipment air
send your request to your principal 2004–19354; Directorate Identifier 2004–CE–
inspector. The principal inspector may add 30–AD. supply and exhaust ducts. We are
comments and will send your request to the issuing this AD to prevent fire
Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on May
Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office 25, 2005.
extinguishing agent from leaking out of
(ACO), FAA. For information on any already the seals around the ducts in the
David R. Showers,
approved alternative methods of compliance, forward cargo compartment in the event
contact Mr. Tin Truong, Aerospace Engineer, Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, of an in-flight fire, which could result in
FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office, Aircraft Certification Service.
failure to extinguish the fire and
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington [FR Doc. 05–10864 Filed 6–6–05; 8:45 am] consequent smoke or fire extinguishing
98055–4065; telephone: (425) 917–6486; BILLING CODE 4910–13–P agent entering a compartment occupied
facsimile: (425) 917–6590.
by passengers or crew.
Does This AD Incorporate Any Material by
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DATES: This AD becomes effective July
Reference?
12, 2005.
(g) You must do the actions required by The incorporation by reference of a
Federal Aviation Administration
this AD following the instructions in Precise
Flight, Inc. Installation Report No. 08074,
certain publication listed in the AD is
Standby Vacuum System Model VI Upgrade 14 CFR Part 39 approved by the Director of the Federal
Kit, dated January 7, 2000 and the MANUAL Register as of July 12, 2005.
[Docket No. FAA–2004–19990; Directorate
VALVE Standby Vacuum System AFM ADDRESSES: For service information
Identifier 2004–NM–199–AD; Amendment
SUPPLEMENT, dated February 4, 2000. The identified in this AD, contact Boeing
39–14114; AD 2005–11–12]
Director of the Federal Register approved the Commercial Airplanes, P.O. Box 3707,
incorporation by reference of this service RIN 2120–AA64
bulletin in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a)
Seattle, Washington 98124–2207.
and 1 CFR part 51. To get a copy of this Docket: The AD docket contains the
Airworthiness Directives; Boeing
service information, contact Precise Flight, proposed AD, comments, and any final
Model 767–200, –300, and –300F Series
Inc., 63354 Powell Butte Road, Bend, Oregon disposition. You can examine the AD
Airplanes
97701, telephone: (800) 547–2558; facsimile: docket on the Internet at http://
(541) 388–1105; electronic mail: AGENCY: Federal Aviation dms.dot.gov, or in person at the Docket
preciseflight@preciseflight.com; Internet: Administration (FAA), Department of Management Facility office between 9
http://www.preciseflight.com/svs.html. To Transportation (DOT). a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
review copies of this service information, go Friday, except Federal holidays. The
to the National Archives and Records ACTION: Final rule.
Administration (NARA). For information on
Docket Management Facility office
the availability of this material at NARA, go SUMMARY: The FAA is adopting a new (telephone (800) 647–5227) is located on
to: http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/ airworthiness directive (AD) for certain the plaza level of the Nassif Building at
code_of_federal_regulations/ Boeing Model 767–200, –300, and the U.S. Department of Transportation,
ibr_locations.html or call (202) 741–6030. To –300F series airplanes. This AD requires 400 Seventh Street, SW., room PL–401,
VerDate jul<14>2003 16:06 Jun 06, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00020 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\07JNR1.SGM 07JNR1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 7, 2005 / Rules and Regulations 32997
Washington, DC. This docket number is from operator to operator, they are responsibilities among the various
FAA–2004–19990; the directorate almost impossible to calculate. We have levels of government.
identifier for this docket is 2004–NM– made no change to the AD in this For the reasons discussed above, I
199–AD. regard. certify that this AD:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
Conclusion action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
Barbara Mudrovich, Aerospace
We have carefully reviewed the (2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under
Engineer, Cabin Safety and
available data, including the comments DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
Environmental Systems Branch, ANM–
that have been submitted, and (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
150S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification (3) Will not have a significant
Office, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, determined that air safety and the
public interest require adopting the AD economic impact, positive or negative,
Washington 98055–4056; telephone on a substantial number of small entities
(425) 917–6477; fax (425) 917–6590. as proposed.
under the criteria of the Regulatory
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA Costs of Compliance Flexibility Act.
proposed to amend 14 CFR part 39 with There are about 468 airplanes of the We prepared a regulatory evaluation
an AD for certain Boeing Model 767– affected design in the worldwide fleet. of the estimated costs to comply with
200, –300, and –300F series airplanes. This AD affects about 342 airplanes of this AD. See the ADDRESSES section for
That action, published in the Federal U.S. registry. a location to examine the regulatory
Register on January 5, 2005 (70 FR 727), For Group 1 and 2 airplanes: The evaluation.
proposed to require installing a new, foam seal installation around the
improved foam seal around certain List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
cooling air supply and exhaust ducts
ducts in the forward cargo takes about 2 work hours per airplane, Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
compartment. at an average labor rate of $65 per work safety, Incorporation by reference,
hour. The cost of parts is minimal. Safety.
Comments
Based on these figures, the estimated Adoption of the Amendment
We provided the public the cost of the installation is $130 per
opportunity to participate in the airplane. ■ Accordingly, under the authority
development of this AD. We have For Group 2 airplanes: The foam seal delegated to me by the Administrator,
considered the comments that have installation around the avionics cooling the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as
been submitted on the proposed AD. and refrigeration unit duct takes about follows:
Two commenters concur with the 2 work hours per airplane, at an average
proposed AD. labor rate of $65 per work hour. The PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
cost of parts is minimal. Based on these DIRECTIVES
Request To Change Costs of Compliance
Section figures, the estimated cost of the ■ 1. The authority citation for part 39
installation is $130 per airplane. continues to read as follows:
One commenter estimates that the
proposed modification of the foam seals Authority for This Rulemaking Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
requires approximately 3.5 work hours Title 49 of the United States Code § 39.13 [Amended]
per airplane, at a cost of $22,220 for its specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
fleet. The commenter notes that it has ■ 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, the following new airworthiness
accomplished the modification on all of Section 106, describes the authority of
its fleet. A second commenter estimates directive (AD):
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
that the required work hours for the Aviation Programs, describes in more 2005–11–12 Boeing: Amendment 39–14114.
proposed AD would be 4.5 work hours detail the scope of the Agency’s Docket No. FAA–2004–19990;
per airplane, as specified in the Directorate Identifier 2004–NM–199–AD.
authority.
referenced service information, at an We are issuing this rulemaking under Effective Date
estimated cost of $292.50 per airplane. the authority described in Subtitle VII, (a) This AD becomes effective July 12,
We infer that the commenters are Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, 2005.
asking that the work hour estimate ‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that Affected ADs
specified in the ‘‘Costs of Compliance’’ section, Congress charges the FAA with
section be increased. We do not agree. (b) None.
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
The cost impact figures discussed in AD air commerce by prescribing regulations Applicability
rulemaking actions represent only the for practices, methods, and procedures (c) This AD applies to Boeing Model 767–
time necessary to perform the specific the Administrator finds necessary for 200, –300, and –300F series airplanes,
actions actually required by the AD. safety in air commerce. This regulation certificated in any category; as identified in
This AD requires installing a new, is within the scope of that authority Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 767–26A0119,
improved foam seal around certain because it addresses an unsafe condition Revision 1, dated July 15, 2004.
ducts in the forward cargo that is likely to exist or develop on Unsafe Condition
compartment. We recognize that in products identified in this rulemaking (d) This AD was prompted by the detection
accomplishing the requirements of any action. of incorrectly installed smoke barrier seals
AD, operators may incur incidental around the electrical/electronic equipment
costs in addition to the direct costs. Regulatory Findings air supply and exhaust ducts. We are issuing
However, the cost analysis in AD We have determined that this AD will this AD to prevent fire extinguishing agent
rulemaking actions typically does not not have federalism implications under from leaking out of the seals around the ducts
include incidental costs, such as the Executive Order 13132. This AD will in the forward cargo compartment in the
event of an in-flight fire, which could result
time required to gain access and close not have a substantial direct effect on in failure to extinguish the fire and
up, planning time, or time necessitated the States, on the relationship between consequent smoke or fire extinguishing agent
by other administrative actions. Because the national government and the States, entering a compartment occupied by
incidental costs may vary significantly or on the distribution of power and passengers or crew.
VerDate jul<14>2003 16:06 Jun 06, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00021 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\07JNR1.SGM 07JNR1
32998 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 7, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
VerDate jul<14>2003 16:06 Jun 06, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00022 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\07JNR1.SGM 07JNR1