Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Gandhigram Rural Institute, Deemed University, Gandhigram, Dindigul, Chinnalapatti, Tamil Nadu, India
ABSTRACT
Manufacturing of natural fibre reinforced Polymer composites exhibit comparative mechanical properties with
glass fibre composites. Due to this reason these categories of composites replace the synthetic fibre composites in all the
industrial application. Few of the natural fibres such as sisal, jute and hemp possess higher specific strength, lightweight,
biodegradability and low cost. In this study, sisal fiber reinforced epoxy composites prepared with varying areal density of
the woven fabric and their mechanical properties such as tensile strength, flexural strength and impact strength were
evaluated. The Sisal fabric composites were prepared with four different fabricGSM and the influence of fabric areal
density on mechanical properties were studied. It is concluded that up to 650 GSM fabric areal density the tensile
properties were increasing after that there would be the reduction in mechanical properties, which is attributed that the
increase in fibre volume fraction will leads to increase in composites mechanical properties and then reduced.
KEYWORDS: Sisal Fiber, Glass Fiber, Silicon Carbide, Epoxy, Polymers, Hand Layup, Mechanical Property
INTRODUCTION
A Composite material is defined as combination of two or more constituents to give unique properties in the
resultant material. The word composite is not new to this world, nature has created many notable composite structure.
As Stated by Silva(2003) the development of Composites reinforced with natural fibersis a sustainable alternative material
for engineering applications, particularly in mechanical, aerospace applications and automobile applications (Silva
RV,2003). Natural fibers display superior mechanical properties such as strength, stiffness, flexibility and high modulus
compared to glass fibers (Goulart S.A.Set al, 2011). As per Joshi SV et al(2004) the important advantages of natural fibers
are of low cost, higher availability, light weight, quick extraction and Eco friendly. Composite materials are deliberately
combined to achieve desired characteristics of two or more distinct materials in the composition. Reinforcing fibers in a
composite may be short or long compared to its overall dimensions. The long fibers and short fibers are known as
continuous fibers and discontinuous fibers, respectively. As stated by Silva RV(2003) the natural fibers are abundance and
renewability, low cost, non-abrasiveness, simple process, non-toxicity, high flexibility, acoustic insulation and low density.
On the other hand, there are some drawbacks due to high moisture absorption. Joseph and co-workers (2002) studied the
effect of chemical treatment on dynamic mechanical properties of Sisal fiber reinforced low density polyethylene
composites. It observed that the cardanol derivative of toluene disocyanate treatment reduced the hydrophilic nature of the
sisal fiber due to this reason the tensile properties of the composites were improved, which was attributed that chemical
bonding between the fibre to resin increased. Nevertheless, some machine components which has been previously
manufactured with glass fiberscomposites are now produced with natural fiber reinforced composite.
www.tjprc.org
editor@tjprc.org
N. Venkateshwaran et.al (2011) studied the mechanical and water absorption behavior of banana/sisal reinforced
hybrid composites. They observed that the influence of fiber length and weight percentage increases the tensile modulus
and impact strength of the composites.
Kai Yang et.al (2010) studied the difference i n thermal conductivity of single fibre reinforced composites to
hybrid composites and concluded that hybrid fibre composites obtain higher thermal conductivity. Ramesh Met al(2013)
concluded from their research that Sisal /GFRP composites sample passes good tensile strength and Jute/GFRP composites
specimen showed the maximum flexural load. The maximum strength is achieved when the fiber length in the laminate is
equal to the critical fiber length. The mechanical strength of the composites depends on the type of fiber matrix, fiber
length, fiber orientation, fiber concentration and the bonding between the fiber and matrix (M. Ramesh et al, 2010). A.
Gowthami et.al.(2012) studied the effect of silica on sisal fiber reinforced polyester composites, the result shows that the
tensile strength of composite with silica is 1.5 times greater the normal composites. Hemalata Jenaet.al. concluded from
their research that effect of bamboo fiber composite filled with cenosphere, result show that the impact property the
composite is highly influenced by the addition of cenospherer and the impact strength is also increased due to this filler
addition. After wards the mechanical properties were decreased (Hemalata Jena,2012). According to S. Husseinsyah et.al.
effect of filler content on mechanical properties of coconut shell reinforced polyestercomposites, high filler content affect
the strength of the composites. Furher they studied the morphology of the composites indicate that the tendency of fillermatrix interaction improved with the increasing filler in polyester matrix (S.Husseinsyah et al, 2011).
EXPERIMENTAL
Materials Method
In the present investigation Sisal fiber (Agave Sisalana) woven composites were prepared with various GSMat the
weaving laboratory of PACR polytechnic college and Glassfiber (woven mat form). Commercially available epoxy
(LY-556) and hardener (HY-951) received from GVR entreprises, Madurai.
Comparative Properties of Sisal and Glass Fiber
Recent days, there has been a dramatic increase in usage of natural fibre as reinforced for composite application.
Some of the key fibres are listed as sisal, jute, coir, flax, hemp, pineapple and banana etc. Where in the Sisal fiber could be
utilized for making variety of products due to its versatile nature and its availability. Similarly E-glass variety of fiber is
used as reinforcement in the FRP preparation since from the beginning, due to its bulk strength and weight properties.
The following table provides the comparative analysis of Sisal fibre Vs Glass fibre
Table 1: Comparative Analysis of Glass and Sisal Fibre Properties
Physical Properties
Density(g/cc)
Elangation at break(%)
cellulose content
Lignin content
Tensile strength(Mpa)
Young's Moduls(Gpa)
Glass Fibre
2.54
3.5%
NIL
NIL
3450
1.9
Sisal Fibre
1.35
2-3%
63-64%
5%
54
3.45
CHARACTERIZATION
The manufactured composites were taken for characterization to understand the influence of the fabric areal
density of reinforcement. The different specimens was tested with tensile (Figure 1), flexural (Figure 2) and impact testing
(Figure 3) and the results are given in Table 2. The Tensile test is conducted by using Universal Testing Machine
(UTM).Three samples have been tested and based on ASTM D3039 standard, the tensile test samples were cut and the test
has been conducted until the sample fails
Table 2: Tensile Behavior of Sisal Fabric Reinforced Composites
Sample (Fabric
Density)
550
600
650
700
Tensile
Strength(N/Mm2)
18
22
35
24
Flexural
Strength(Mpa)
22
34
42
31
Impact
Strength(Kj/M2)
21
24
31
22
Tensile Properties
The composite samples were tested in the UTM and stress-strain curve was plotted. The typical graph generated
directly from machine for tensile testing of sisal composite.
www.tjprc.org
editor@tjprc.org
CONCLUSIONS
The Sisal fabric reinforced composite specimens were prepared and subjected to Tensile, Flexural and impact
loadings.From the experimental results following observations can be made.
The sisal composite samples possess good tensile strength and can withstand the strength up to the fabric gsm of
650 after that the reduction in tensile properties were shown.
www.tjprc.org
editor@tjprc.org
The reduction in Tensile properties were attributed that due to increase in fibre volume fraction.
REFERENCES
1.
Silva RV. Composito de resinapoliuretanaderivada de oleo de mamona e fibrasvegetais. Tese (Doutorado) EscoladeEngenharia de So Carlos, Universidade de So Paulo, Sao Carlos, 2003, p. 139.
2.
Goulart S.A.S., Oliveira T.A., Teixeira A., Mileo P.C., Mulinari D.R., Mechanical behaviour of polypropylene
reinforced palmfibers composites, Procedia Engineering;2011;10:2034-2039.
3.
Geethamma VG, Thomas Mathew K, Lakshminarayanan R, Sabu Thomas. Composite of short coir fibers and
natural rubber:Effect of chemical modification, loading and orientation of fiber, Polymer 1998;6:148390.
4.
Joshi SV, Drzal LT, Mohanty AK, Arora S. Are natural fiber composites environmentally superior to glass fiberreinforcedcomposites, Compos Part A 2004;35:3716.
5.
Joseph S, Sreekala M. S, Oommen Z, Koshy P, and Thomas S, A Comparison of the Mechanical Properties of
Phenol Formaldehyde Composites Reinforced with Banana Fibers and Glass Fibers, Composites Science and
Technology, 62(14), 2002, pp. 1857-1868.
6.
7.
Kai Yang, MingyuanGu, Enhanced thermal conductivity of epoxy nanocomposites filled with hybrid filler system
oftriethylenetetramine-functionalized multi-walled carbon nanotube/silane-modified nano-sized silicon carbide.
Composites: Part A 41(2010) 215221.
8.
Se Young Kim, In Sub Han, Sang Kuk Woo, Kee Sung Lee, Do Kyung Kim. Wear-mechanical properties of
filler-added liquidsilicon infiltration C/CSiC composites. Materials and Design 44 (2013) 107113.
9.
10. A.Gowthami. K.Ramanaiah, A. V. Ratna Prasad, K. Hema Chandra Reddy, K. MohanaRao. Effect of silica on
thermal andmechanical properties if sisal fiber reinforced polyster composites, Journal of material environment
science, 2012, vol.4 (2), pp.199-204.
11. Hemalata Jena, Mihir Ku, Pandit, and Arun Ku (2012), Study the impact property of laminated Bamboo-Fiber
composite
filledwith
cenosphere,International
journal
of
environmental
science
and
development,2012,vol.3(5).pp.456-459.
12. S.Husseinsyah and M.MostaphaandZakaria, The effect of filler content on properties of coconut shell filled
polystercomposites, Malaysian polymer journal, 2011,vol.6.pp.87-9.