Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Submitted to:
Maam Aniqa
Khadija Kalim
L1s12bbam2005
Zain Naqvi
L1f11bbam0327
Aqsa Javaid
L1s12bbam2030
Saleha Khalid
0 | Page
Contents
I. Abstract
II. Introduction:
1.
Definitions:
2.
Background:
III. Objective:
1.
Independent Variables:
2.
Dependent Variables:
3.
Mediating Variable:
4.
Relationship:
IV. Significant:
V. Limitations:
VI. Literature Review
VII. Variables:
VIII. DEFINITION OF VARIABLES:
IX. Theoretical Frame-work:
X. Schematic Diagram:
XI. Hypotheses
XII. Research Design
1.
Nature of Research:
2.
EXTENT OF RESEARCH:
3.
STUDY SETTING:
4.
Population:
5.
Sampling:
6.
7.
UNIT OF ANALYSIS:
8.
TIME HORIZON:
Reliability:
2.
Descriptive Statistics:
1 | Page
Correlation:
4.
T-Test:
5.
Regression:
Conclusion:
2.
Recommendations:
XVI. Appendices:
XVII.References:
Gender Discrimination
Workplace Violence
Job Commitment
2 | Page
1 | Page
Background:
2 | Page
III.
Objective:
3 | Page
Significant:
V.
Limitations:
We cannot collect the data at very large scale due to
shortage of time.
Based on that, we cannot generalize the whole result.
Because the gender discrimination is emotionally
charged, so cannot collect the exact data, the reason
is that no one was ready to give the exact response.
VI.
Literature Review
4 | Page
5 | Page
VII.
Variables:
Independent variable
Gender discrimination
Dependent variable
Job commitment
Mediating Variable
Workplace violence
VIII.
DEFINITION OF VARIABLES:
IX.
Theoretical Frame-work:
Gender
X.
Schematic Diagram:
Gender
Discriminati
on
Workplace Violence
Job Commitment
Harassment
Salary
Affective
commitment
Verbal abuse
Promotion
Continuance
Commitment
Physical
attack
Rewards
Normative
Commitment
Responsibiliti
es
XI.
Hypotheses
7 | Page
Research Design
1.
Nature of Research:
The nature of research is of descriptive study. This research has
been designed to collect data that how gender discrimination effects
the job commitment.
Descriptive research design is a valid method for researching
specific subjects and as a sign to more quantitative studies.
This study is correlational in nature as it describes relationships
among variables.
2.
EXTENT OF RESEARCH:
3.
STUDY SETTING:
4.
Population:
5.
Sampling:
Our research has probability sampling technique. Our sample is known. And our
sample size was 200 and respondent rate is 92 per cent.
6.
We tried to make an instrument that can collect the data reliably. Our instrument of data
collection was a questionnaire in which there were 3 parts and each part was dedicated to
each of the 3 variables on which our research focus
7.
UNIT OF ANALYSIS:
8.
TIME HORIZON:
Our study is cross-sectional study. Because we have gathered data at once in order to answer
a research question.
8 | Page
Demographic Analysis:
0 | Page
XIV.
interpretation:
1.
Reliability:
a)
Job commitment
Our dependents questions are 15, and after analyse the data, our
research find out alpha 0.885(In Table 1), which means that our all 15
questions of dependent variable are in same direction, and all have
impacts on job commitment.
Reliability Statistics(Table 1)
Cronbach's Alpha
N of Items
.885
15
b)
Workplace Violence:
By entering the data, our research find out the value of alpha of
independent variables is 0.895 (In table 2), which means that our all 29
questions of independent variables are in same direction, it means that
all are related to the gender discrimination and also have impacts on
gender discrimination.
Reliability Statistics(Table 2)
Cronbach's Alpha
N of Items
.895
29
c)
Job Commitment:
Our mediating variables questions are 23, and after analyse the
data, our research find out alpha 0.893(In Table 3), which means
0 | Page
N of Items
.893
2.
23
Descriptive Statistics:
Descriptive Statistics(Table 4)
N
Minimum
Maximum
Mean
Std. Deviation
Gender Discrimination
200
4.00
18.00
7.8350
2.77783
Salary
200
3.00
13.00
6.1200
1.91414
Promotion
200
20.00
51.00
34.1750
9.43927
Responsibilities
200
3.00
15.00
7.7300
2.94797
Rewards
200
5.00
23.00
12.5050
3.99623
Workplace Violence
200
13.00
41.00
25.8050
7.27403
Verbal Abuse
200
10.00
36.00
21.3600
6.58538
Harassment
200
3.00
15.00
7.0500
2.94292
Physical Attack
200
2.00
10.00
5.0550
2.08656
Affective Commitment
200
5.00
23.00
13.3100
4.43761
Continuance Commitment
200
5.00
23.00
12.8300
4.11287
Normative Commitment
200
6.00
24.00
13.0100
3.87362
Valid N (listwise)
200
a)
Gender Discrimination:
The mean of gender discrimination is 7.835 with standard deviation is 2.778. The minimum
and maximum values are 4 and 18 respectively. It indicates that there is a high level of gender
discrimination in the population.
b)
Salary:
The mean of salary is 6.1200 with standard deviation is 1.914. The minimum and maximum
values are 3 and 13 respectively. It indicates that there is gender discrimination in the in slary.
1 | Page
Promotion:
The mean of promotion is 34.175 with standard deviation is 9.439. The minimum and
maximum values are 20 and 51 respectively. It indicates that there is a high level of gender
discrimination in promotion in the population.
d)
Responsibilities:
The mean of responsibilities is 7.7300 with standard deviation is 2.947. The minimum and
maximum values are 3 and 15 respectively. It indicates that the population agree with the
gender discrimination in responsibilities.
e)
Rewards:
The mean of rewards is 12.50 with standard deviation is 3.997. The minimum and maximum
values are 5 and 23 respectively. It indicates that there is a high level of gender discrimination
regarding rewards in the population.
f)
Workplace Violence:
The mean of workplace violence 25.805 with standard deviation is 7.274. The minimum and
maximum values are 13 and 41 respectively. It indicates that there is a moderate level of
workplace violence in the population.
g)
Verbal Abuse:
The mean of verbal abuse is 21.360 with standard deviation is 6.585. The minimum and
maximum values are 10 and 36 respectively. It indicates that there is a medium level of
verbal abuse in the population.
h)
Physical Attack:
The mean of physical attack is 5.055 with standard deviation is 2.086. The minimum and
maximum values are 2 and 10 respectively. It indicates that there is a high level of physical
attack in the population.
i)
Affective Commitment:
The mean of Affective Commitment is 13.310 with standard deviation is 4.437. The
minimum and maximum values are 5 and 23 respectively. It indicates that there is a high
level of affective commitment in the population.
j)
Continuance Commitment
The mean of Continuance Commitment is 12.830 with standard deviation is 4.112. The
minimum and maximum values are 5 and 23 respectively. It indicates that there is a high
level of Continuance Commitment in the population.
k)
Normative Commitment
The mean of Normative Commitment is 13.013 with standard deviation is 3.873. The
minimum and maximum values are 6 and 24 respectively. It indicates that there is a high
level of Normative Commitment in the population.
2 | Page
3.
Correlation:
Correlations(Table 5)
Your gender
Your gender
Pearson Correlation
GenderDis
1
GenderDis
Salary
Pearson Correlation
Responsibilities
Responsibilities
-.084
.019
.042
.333
.118
.393
.278
200
199
200
200
200
-.031
.483**
.108
.102
.000
.065
.076
Sig. (1-tailed)
.333
199
199
199
199
199
-.084
.483**
.152*
.164*
Sig. (1-tailed)
.118
.000
.016
.010
200
199
200
200
200
Pearson Correlation
.019
.108
.152*
.692**
Sig. (1-tailed)
.393
.065
.016
200
199
200
Pearson Correlation
.042
.102
.164
Sig. (1-tailed)
.278
.076
.010
.000
200
199
200
200
Pearson Correlation
Rewards
Rewards
-.031
Sig. (1-tailed)
N
Salary
.000
200
.692
200
1
**
200
Table 1 shows the correlation between the gender and gender discrimination
along with its dimension.
3 | Page
Correlations(Table 6)
WorkplaceVoilenc
GenderDis
GenderDis
Pearson Correlation
e
1
VerbalAbuse
Harassment
PhysicalAttack
PhysicalAttack
.211**
.364**
.238**
.002
.003
.000
.001
199
199
199
199
199
.223**
.490**
.339**
.335**
.000
.000
.000
N
Pearson Correlation
Harassment
.223**
Sig. (2-tailed)
WorkplaceVoilence
VerbalAbuse
Sig. (2-tailed)
.002
199
200
200
200
200
.211**
.490**
.397**
.332**
Sig. (2-tailed)
.003
.000
.000
.000
199
200
200
200
.504**
Pearson Correlation
Pearson Correlation
.364
**
.339
**
200
.397
**
Sig. (2-tailed)
.000
.000
.000
199
200
200
Pearson Correlation
.238
**
.335
**
.332
**
.000
200
.504
**
Sig. (2-tailed)
.001
.000
.000
.000
199
200
200
200
There is a weak positive relationship among gender discrimination and verbal abuse
and it is 99% significance.
4 | Page
200
1
200
There is a weak positive relationship among gender discrimination and physical attack
and it is 99% significance.
There is a moderate positive relationship among verbal abuse and workplace violence
and it is 99% significance.
There is a weak positive relationship among harassment and workplace violence and
it is 99% significance
There is a weak positive relationship among physical attack and workplace violence
and it is 99% significance.
There is a moderate positive relationship among harassment and physical attack and it
is 100% significance as value is .000.
4.
T-Test:
a)
Gender:
Group Statistics
Your gender
Jobcommitment
female
male
Mean
Std. Deviation
82
35.7927
10.56635
1.16686
118
36.9153
9.46390
.87122
95% Confidence I
Differen
Std. Error
F
Jobcommitment
Sig.
2.217
t
.138
df
Sig. (2-tailed)
Mean Difference
Difference
Lower
-.786
198
.433
-1.12257
1.42759
-3.93780
-.771
161.694
.442
-1.12257
1.45622
-3.99824
assumed
T-test shows the level of significance and it tells us that with the change in one variable, how
much other variable changes and in the above table there is a t-statistics of gender and job
commitment and here the test variable is job commitment and gender lies in grouping
variable and there is a negative relationship between gender and job commitment and the
5 | Page
b)
Age:
Group Statistics
Your age
Jobcommitment
Mean
Std. Deviation
25
16
35.1875
7.60893
1.90223
40
36.0000
2.00000
1.15470
Std. Error
F
Jobcommitment
Sig.
3.394
t
.083
df
Sig. (2-tailed)
Mean Difference
-.180
17
.859
-.81250
4.5174
-.365
13.918
.721
-.81250
2.2252
assumed
In the above table there is a t-statistics of age and job commitment and here the test variable
is job commitment and age lies in grouping variable and there is a negative relationship
between age and job commitment but the level of significance exceeds from.10 so we are
insignificant to say that age have impact on job commitment.
c)
Educational qualification:
Group Statistics
Your educational
qualification
Jobcommitment
Intermediate
Masters
Mean
Difference
Std. Deviation
42.2857
6.52468
2.46610
63
36.6032
10.21469
1.28693
6 | Page
95% Confidence I
Differen
Std. Error
F
Jobcommitment
Sig.
.647
t
.424
df
Sig. (2-tailed)
Mean Difference
Difference
1.434
68
.014
5.68254
3.96192
-2.22335
2.043
9.644
.014
5.68254
2.78169
-.54664
assumed
Here the test variable is job commitment and educational qualification lies in grouping
variable and there is a positive relationship between job commitment and educational
qualification and the level of significance is 95% because it exceeds from.000 so we are 95%
confident to say that those who are more qualified have more impacts on job commitment
than those who are less qualified.
5.
Regression:
Model Summary
Std. Error of the
Model
1
R Square
.675
.456
Adjusted R Square
Lower
Estimate
.442
3.07155
7 | Page
Sum of Squares
df
Mean Square
Regression
1535.941
307.188
Residual
1830.279
194
9.434
Total
3366.220
199
Sig.
.000a
32.560
Coefficientsa
Standardized
Unstandardized Coefficients
Model
1
Coefficients
Std. Error
Beta
(Constant)
2.331
1.048
GenderDis
.067
.091
-.068
Promotion
Sig.
2.223
.027
.046
.742
.459
.131
-.032
-.519
.605
.148
.031
.341
4.748
.000
Responsibilities
.185
.113
.133
1.634
.104
Rewards
.311
.077
.302
4.024
.000
Salary
In the above table there are five independent variables I.e. gender
discrimination, salary, promotion responsibilities and rewards. The dependent
variable is Continuance Commitment. The value R square is 0.456 which means
that there is about 46% change in dependent variable(Continuance
Commitment) is due to independent variables(. gender discrimination, salary,
promotion responsibilities and rewards). It is 100% significance.
Hypotheses:
If
Gender
discrimination
is
being
perceived
in
the
8 | Page
2.
Recommendations:
The organization should not give preference to one specific
gender they should treat equally.
The organization should hire employees on the basis of merit
not on gender base.
The manager should give promotion according to eligible
criteria rather than gender.
The criteria must be equal for both genders.
In order to remove gender discriminations, salary must be
equal for the same level of employees.
Opportunity must be given equally for getting promotion.
9 | Page
Appendices:
QUESTIONNAIRE
Gender
o Male
o Female
Age__________________
Education qualification
o Intermediate
o Bachelor
o Masters
o M. Phil / MS
o Doctorate
o Others
What is your current income per month?
o Below 20,000
o 20,001 30,000
o 30,001 40,000
o 40,001 50,000
o Above 50,000
Level of position
o Non-management
o Junior management
o Middle management
o Senior management
Gender Discrimination
Gender discrimination is a prejudice based on persons gender. It may
be practiced in various fields. Most commonly is occurs in the
workplace. A job applicant may face discriminatory hiring practices.
They receive unequal compensation compared to that of their oppositesex peers.
Questions
Strongl
y
Agree
Agre
e
Neutr Disagr
al
ee
Strongly
Disagree
1. Have you
experienced
10 | P a g e
Stron
gly
Agree
Agre
e
Neut
ral
Disagr
ee
Strongl
y
Disagre
e
1. There are
salary gaps
among the
same level in
your
organization.
2. You have
been unfairly
denied a
salary
11 | P a g e
Questions
Stron
gly
Agree
Agre
e
Neut
ral
Disagr
ee
Stron
gly
Disag
ree
1. Men in your
organization are
more
concentrated in
top managerial
positions than
women
2. Promotion occurs
without
consideration of
gender in your
Organization.
3. Women have
opportunities for
advancement in
your organization
to the same
extent as men.
4. Women have
enough
encouragement
and support for
advancement in
your
organization.
12 | P a g e
Responsibility:
Questions
Stron
gly
Disag
ree
Slight
ly
Disag
ree
Agr
ee
Sligh
tly
Agre
e
Stron
gly
Agree
Neut
ral
Stron
gly
Disag
ree
Slight
ly
Disag
ree
Agr
ee
Sligh
tly
Agre
e
Stron
gly
Agree
Workplace violence
It is any act in which a person is abused, threatened, intimidated or
assaulted in his or her employment.
It includes Threatening behavior, Verbal or written threats,
harassment, Verbal abuse, Physical attacks
15 | P a g e
Neut
ral
Stron
gly
Disag
ree
Slight
ly
Disag
ree
Agr
ee
Sligh
tly
Agre
e
Stron
gly
Agree
Neut
ral
Stron
gly
Disag
ree
Slight
ly
Disag
ree
Agr
ee
Sligh
tly
Agre
e
Stron
gly
Agree
Having insulted or
offensive remarks
made about your
person (i.e. habits
and background),
your attitude or your
private life.
Being shouted at or
being the target of
spontaneous anger
(or rage)
Persistent criticism
of your work and
effort.
Practical jokes
carried out by people
you didnt get on
with.
17 | P a g e
Neut
ral
Harassment
Harassment covers a wide range of behaviors of an offensive nature. It is
commonly understood as behavior intended to disturb or upset, and it is
characteristically repetitive. In the legal sense, it is intentional behavior
which is found threatening or disturbing.
Questions
Stron
gly
Disag
ree
Slight
ly
Disag
ree
Agr
ee
Sligh
tly
Agre
e
Stron
gly
Agree
Physical Attack
18 | P a g e
Neut
ral
Stron
gly
Disag
ree
Slight
ly
Disag
ree
Agr
ee
Sligh
tly
Agre
e
Stron
gly
Agree
Neut
ral
Intimidating behavior
such as fingerpointing, invasion of
personal space,
shoving,
blocking\barring the
way.
Threats of violence
or physical abuse or
actual abuse
Upton,L.(2010). The impact of workplace bullying on individual and
organizational. Witwatersrand: Private Bag 3, WITS, 2050
Job Commitment
Organizational commitment is the individual's psychological attachment to
the organization
Affective Commitment
Questions
Stron
gly
Disag
ree
Slight
ly
Disag
ree
Agr
ee
Sligh
tly
Agre
e
Stron
gly
Agree
I would be very
happy to spend the
rest of my career
with this
organization
I really feel as if this
organizations
problems are my
own
This organization has
a great deal of
personal meaning for
me
Even if it were to my
advantage, I do not
feel I would be right
to leave my
19 | P a g e
Neut
ral
Stron
gly
Disag
ree
Slight
ly
Disag
ree
Agr
ee
Sligh
tly
Agre
e
Stron
gly
Agree
Neut
ral
Stron
gly
Disag
ree
Slight
ly
Disag
ree
Agr
ee
Sligh
tly
Agre
e
Stron
gly
Agree
XVII.
References:
Neut
ral
1 | Page