Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 16

24020 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No.

87 / Friday, May 6, 2005 / Notices

SEEA. According to the rate procedures Stampede, Western will use the in the CVP PRR. Western estimates the
for the CVP, Western will review the disposition of the SEEA account Stampede Annual Transferred PRR for
CVP PRR in March and September of through February and estimate March October 2005 through September 2006
each year. Western will analyze the CVP through September to determine the to be $401,000.
financial data from October through amount of costs to be included in the A comparison of existing and
February, to the extent information is CVP PRR. Again, in September when
proposed rates follows:
available, as well as forecasted data for the next review occurs, Western will use
March through September. In the case of the same methodology to include costs

COMPARISON OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED RATES


[Washoe Project, Stampede Powerplant]

Existing rates as Proposed rates Percent


Non-firm existing rates of 10/1/00 (effective 10/1/ change
(Mills/kWh) 05)

Floor Rate (Mills/kWh) ..................................................................................................... 17.89 17.89 0


Ceiling Rate ..................................................................................................................... 90.07 N/A N/A

Legal Authority participation in power rate adjustments Determination Under Executive Order
Stampede is a feature of the Washoe (10 CFR part 903) were published on 12866
Project authorized by Congress in 1956 September 18, 1985 (50 FR 37835). Western has an exemption from
and is located on the Little Truckee Availability of Information centralized regulatory review under
River in Sierra County, California. The Executive Order 12866; so this notice
powerplant has a maximum operating All brochures, studies, comments, requires no clearance by the Office of
capability of 3,650 kW with an letters, memorandums, or other Management and Budget.
estimated annual generation of 11 documents that Western initiates or uses
million kilowatthours (kWh). Since Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
to develop the proposed rates are Fairness Act
Stampede has an installed capacity of available for inspection and copying at
less than 20,000 kW and generates less the Sierra Nevada Regional Office, Western has determined this rule is
than 100 million kWh annually for sale, located at 114 Parkshore Drive, Folsom, exempt from congressional notification
the proposed rates constitute a minor requirements under 5 U.S.C. 801
California. Many of these documents
rate adjustment. Western has because the action is a rulemaking of
and supporting information are also
determined that it is not necessary to particular applicability relating to rates
hold a public information or comment available on the Web site under the
or services and involves matters of
forum for this proposed minor rate ‘‘Current Rates’’ section located at
procedure.
adjustment as defined by 10 CFR part http://www.wapa.gov/sn/customers/
rates/#currentrates/. Dated: April 25, 2005.
903. After review of public comments,
Michael S. Hacskaylo,
and possible amendments or Regulatory Procedure Requirements
adjustments, Western will recommend Administrator.
the Deputy Secretary of Energy approve Regulatory Flexibility Analysis [FR Doc. 05–9080 Filed 5–5–05; 8:45 am]
proposed rates for non-firm energy from BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
Stampede on an interim basis. The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980
These proposed rates for non-firm (5 U.S.C. 601, et seq.) requires Federal
energy for Stampede are being agencies to perform a regulatory ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
established under the Department of flexibility analysis if a final rule is likely AGENCY
Energy Organization Act (42 U.S.C. to have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities [Docket ID No. OECA–2005–0016 to 0051
7152); the Reclamation Act of 1902 (ch.
FRL–7908–6]
1093, 32 Stat. 388), as amended and and there is a legal requirement to issue
supplemented by subsequent laws, a general notice of proposed Agency Information Collection
particularly section 9(c) of the rulemaking. This action does not require Activities: Request for Comments on
Reclamation Act of 1939 (43 U.S.C. a regulatory flexibility analysis since it Thirty Six Proposed Information
485h(c)); and other acts that specifically is a rulemaking of particular Collection Requests (ICRs)
apply to the project involved. applicability involving rates or services
By Delegation Order No. 00–037.00, applicable to public property. AGENCY: Environmental Protection
effective December 6, 2001, the Agency (EPA).
Secretary of Energy delegated: (1) The Environmental Compliance ACTION: Notice.
authority to develop power and
transmission rates to Western’s In compliance with the National SUMMARY: In compliance with the
Administrator; (2) the authority to Environmental Policy Act of 1969 Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) (44
confirm, approve, and place such rates (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321, et seq.); U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), this document
into effect, on an interim basis, to the Council on Environmental Quality announces that EPA is planning to
Deputy Secretary of Energy; and (3) the Regulations (40 CFR parts 1500–1508); submit the following 36 existing,
authority to confirm, approve, and place and DOE NEPA Regulations (10 CFR approved, continuing Information
into effect, on a final basis, to remand part 1021), Western has determined this Collection Requests (ICR) to the Office
or to disapprove such rates to the action is categorically excluded from of Management and Budget (OMB) for
Commission. Existing Department of preparing an environmental assessment the purpose of renewing the ICRs.
Energy (DOE) procedures for public or an environmental impact statement. Before submitting the ICRs to OMB for

VerDate jul<14>2003 18:03 May 05, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00060 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\06MYN1.SGM 06MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 87 / Friday, May 6, 2005 / Notices 24021

review and approval, EPA is soliciting control number. The OMB control electronic docket at 67 FR 38102 (May
comments on specific aspects of the numbers for EPA’s standards are 31, 2002), or go to http://www.epa.gov./
information collections as described displayed at 40 CFR part 9. edocket.
under SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.
B. Public Dockets II. ICRs To Be Renewed
DATES: Comments must be submitted on
or before July 5, 2005. EPA has established official public A. For All ICRs
dockets for the ICRs listed under
ADDRESSES: Comments may be SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION, section II.
The listed ICRs address Clean Air Act
submitted electronically, by mail, or B. The official public docket for each information collection requirements in
through hand delivery/courier service. ICR consists of the documents standards (i.e., standards) which have
Follow the detailed instructions as specifically referenced in the ICR, any mandatory recordkeeping and reporting
provided under SUPPLEMENTARY public comments received, and other requirements. Records collected under
INFORMATION, section I. B. information related to each ICR. The the New Source Performance Standards
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The official public docket for each ICR is the (NSPS) must be retained by the owner
contact individuals for each ICR are collection of materials that is available or operator for at least two years and the
listed under SUPPLEMENTARY for public viewing at the Enforcement records collected under the National
INFORMATION, section II. C. and Compliance Docket and Information Emission Standards for Hazardous Air
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Center in the EPA Docket Center (EPA/ Pollutants (NESHAP) must be retained
DC), EPA West, Room B102, 1301 by the owner or operator for at least five
I. General Information Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, years. In general, the required
A. Background DC. The EPA Docket Center Public collections consist of emissions data
Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to and other information deemed not to be
Pursuant to section 3506(c)(2)(A) of 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, private.
the PRA, EPA is soliciting comments excluding legal holidays. The telephone In the absence of such information
and information to enable it to: number for the Reading Room is (202) collection requirements, enforcement
(1) Evaluate whether the proposed 566–1744, and the telephone number for personnel would be unable to determine
collections of information are necessary the Enforcement and Compliance whether the standards are being met on
for the proper performance of the Docket and Information Center Docket is a continuous basis, as required by the
functions of the Agency, including (202) 566–1514. An electronic version of Clean Air Act.
whether the information will have the public docket for each ICR is The Agency computed the burden for
practical utility. available through EPA Dockets each of the recordkeeping and reporting
(2) Evaluate the accuracy of the (EDOCKET) at: http://www.epa.gov/ requirements applicable to the industry
Agency’s estimates of the burdens of the edocket. Use EDOCKET to obtain a copy for the currently approved Information
proposed collections of information. of the draft collection of information, to Collection Requests (ICRs) listed in this
(3) Enhance the quality, utility, and submit or to view public comments, to notice. Where applicable, the Agency
clarity of the information to be access the index listing of the contents identified specific tasks and made
collected. of the public docket, and to access those assumptions, while being consistent
(4) Minimize the burden of the documents in the public docket that are with the concept of the Paperwork
collections of information on those who available electronically. When in the Reduction Act.
are to respond, including through the system, select ‘‘search,’’ then key in the
use of appropriate automated or B. List of ICRs Planned To Be Submitted
docket ID number identified above.
electronic collection technologies or Any comments related to the listed In compliance with the Paperwork
other forms of information technology, ICRs above should be submitted to EPA Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.),
e.g., permitting electronic submission of within 60 days of this notice. EPA’s this notice announces that EPA is
responses. policy is that public comments, whether planning to submit the following 36
Burden means the total time, effort, or submitted electronically or in paper, continuing Information Collection:
financial resources expended by persons will be made available for public (1) NESHAP for Steel Pickling, HCl
to generate, maintain, retain, or disclose viewing in EDOCKET as EPA receives Process Facilities and Hydrochloric
or provide information to or for a them and without change, unless the Acid Regeneration Plants (40 CFR Part
Federal agency. This includes the time comment contains copyrighted material, 63, Subpart CCC); Docket ID Number
needed to review instructions; develop, Confidential Business Information (CBI), OECA–2005–0047; EPA ICR Number
acquire, install, and utilize technology or other information whose public 1821.05; OMB Control Number 2060–
and systems for the purposes of disclosure is restricted by statute. When 0419; expiration date October 31, 2005.
collecting, validating, and verifying EPA identifies a comment containing (2) NESHAP for Portland Cement (40
information, processing and copyrighted material, EPA will provide CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL); Docket ID
maintaining information, and disclosing a reference to that material in the Number OECA–2005–0040; EPA ICR
and providing information; adjust the version of the comment that is placed in Number 1801.04; OMB Control Number
existing ways to comply with any EDOCKET. The entire printed comment, 2060–0416; expiration date October 31,
previously applicable instructions and including the copyrighted material, will 2005.
requirements; train personnel to be able be available in the public docket. (3) NESHAP for Inorganic Arsenic
to respond to a collection of Although identified as an item in the Emissions from Glass Manufacturing
information; search data sources; official docket, information claimed as Plants (40 CFR Part 61, Subpart N);
complete and review the collection of CBI, or whose disclosure is otherwise Docket ID Number OECA–2005–0034;
information; and transmit or otherwise restricted by statute, is not included in EPA ICR Number 1081.08; OMB Control
disclose the information. the official public docket, and will not Number 2060–0043; expiration date
An agency may not conduct or be available for public viewing in October 31, 2005.
sponsor, and a person is not required to EDOCKET. For further information (4) NSPS for Sulfuric Acid Plants (40
respond to, a collection of information about the electronic docket, see EPA’s CFR Part 60, Subpart H); Docket ID
unless it displays a currently valid OMB Federal Register notice describing the Number OECA–2005–0025; EPA ICR

VerDate jul<14>2003 18:03 May 05, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00061 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\06MYN1.SGM 06MYN1
24022 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 87 / Friday, May 6, 2005 / Notices

Number 1057.10; OMB Control Number 63, Subpart HHHH); Docket ID Number 1952.03; OMB Control Number 2060–
2060–0041; expiration date October 31, OECA–2005–0048; EPA ICR Number 0518; expiration date May 31, 2006.
2005. 1964.03; OMB Control Number 2060– (27) NESHAP for Asphalt Processing
(5) NSPS for Primary and Secondary 0496; expiration date December 31, and Asphalt Roofing Manufacturing (40
Emissions from Basic Oxygen Furnaces 2005. CFR Part 63, Subpart LLLLL); Docket ID
(40 CFR Part 60, Subparts N and Na); (16) NESHAP for Asbestos (40 CFR Number OECA–2005–0051; EPA ICR
Docket ID Number OECA–2005–0044; Part 61, Subpart M); Docket ID Number Number 2029.03; OMB Control Number
EPA ICR Number 1069.08; OMB Control OECA–2005–0019; EPA ICR Number 2060–0520; expiration date May 31,
Number 2060–0029; expiration date 0111.11; OMB Control Number 2060– 2006.
October 31, 2005. 0101; expiration date March 31, 2006. (28) NESHAP for Flexible
(6) NESHAP for Primary Lead (17) NSPS for Beverage Can Surface Polyurethane Foam Fabrication 40 CFR
Smelters (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart TTT); Coating (40 CFR Part 60, Subpart WW); Part 63, Subpart MMMMM); Docket ID
Docket ID Number OECA–2005–0046; Docket ID Number OECA–2005–0038; Number OECA–2005–0033; EPA ICR
EPA ICR Number 1856.05; OMB Control EPA ICR Number 0663.09; OMB Control Number 2027.03; OMB Control Number
Number 2060–0414; expiration date Number 2060–0001; expiration date 2060–0516; expiration date May 31,
October 31, 2005. April 30, 2006. 2006.
(7) NSPS for Petroleum Refineries (40 (18) NSPS for Grain Elevators (40 CFR (29) NESHAP for Paper and Other
CFR Part 60, Subpart J); Docket ID Part 60, Subpart DD); Docket ID Number Web Coating (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart
Number OECA–2005–0016; EPA ICR OECA–2005–0026; EPA ICR Number JJJJ); Docket ID Number OECA–2005–
Number 1054.09; OMB Control Number 1130.08; OMB Control Number 2060– 0032; EPA ICR Number 1951.03; OMB
2060–0022; expiration date November 0082; expiration date April 30, 2006. Control Number 2060–0511; expiration
30, 2005. (19) NSPS for Kraft Pulp Mills (40 date May 31, 2006.
(8) NESHAP for Source Categories CFR Part 60, Subpart BB); Docket ID (30) NESHAP for Coke Oven Pushing
Generic Maximum Achievable Control Number OECA–2005–0039; EPA ICR Quenching and Battery Stacks (40 CFR
Technology Standards (40 CFR Part 63, Number 1055.08; OMB Control Number Part 63, Subpart CCCCC); Docket ID
Subpart YY); Docket ID Number OECA– 2060–0021; expiration date April 30, Number OECA–2005–0050; EPA ICR
2005–0030; EPA ICR Number 1871.04; 2006. Number 1995.03; OMB Control Number
OMB Control Number 2060–0420; (20) NSPS for Lime Manufacturing (40 2060–0521; expiration date May 31,
expiration date December 31, 2005. CFR Part 60, Subpart HH); Docket ID 2006.
(9) NSPS for Municipal Solid Waste (31) NESHAP for Printing, Coating
Number OECA–2005–0028; EPA ICR
Landfills (40 CFR Part 60, Subpart and Dyeing of Fabrics and Other
Number 1167.08; OMB Control Number
WWW); Docket ID Number OECA– Textiles (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart
2060–0063; expiration date April 30,
2005–0029; EPA ICR Number 1557.06; OOOO); Docket ID Number OECA–
2006.
OMB Control Number 2060–0220; 2005–0023; EPA ICR Number 2071.03;
(21) NSPS for Hot Mix Asphalt
expiration date October 31, 2005. OMB Control Number 2060–0522;
(10) NSPS for Calciners and Dryers in Facilities (40 CFR Part 60, Subpart I);
expiration date May 31, 2006.
Mineral Industries (40 CFR Part 60, Docket ID Number OECA–2005–0045; (32) NESHAP for Refractory Products
Subpart UUU); Docket ID Number EPA ICR Number 1127.08; OMB Control Manufacturing (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart
OECA–2005–0024; EPA ICR Number Number 2060–0083; expiration date SSSSS); Docket ID Number OECA–
0746.06; OMB Control Number 2060– April 31, 2006. 2005–0022; EPA ICR Number 2040.03;
0251; expiration date December 31, (22) NESHAP for Municipal Solid OMB Control Number 2060–0515;
2005. Waste Landfills (40 CFR Part 63, expiration date May 31, 2006.
(11) NSPS for Metal Coil Surface Subpart AAAA); Docket ID Number (33) NESHAP for Brick and Structural
Coating (40 CFR Part 60, Subpart TT); OECA–2005–0031; EPA ICR Number Clay Manufacturing (40 CFR Part 63,
Docket ID Number OECA–2005–0037; 1938.03; OMB Control Number 2060– Subpart JJJJJ); Docket ID Number OECA–
EPA ICR Number 0660.09; OMB Control 0505; expiration date April 30, 2006. 2005–0021; EPA ICR Number 2022.03;
Number 2060–0107; expiration date (23) NESHAP for the Wood Building OMB Control Number 2060–0508;
December 31, 2005. Products Surface Coating Industry (40 expiration date May 31, 2006.
(12) NSPS for Bulk Gasoline CFR Part 63, Subpart WWWW); Docket (34) NESHAP for Benzene Waste
Terminals (40 CFR part 60, Subpart XX); ID Number OECA–2005–0043; EPA ICR Operations (40 CFR Part 61, Subpart
Docket ID Number OECA–2005–0017; Number 2034.03; OMB Control Number FF); Docket ID Number OECA–2005–
EPA ICR Number 0664.08; OMB Control 2060–0510; expiration date May 31, 0020; EPA ICR Number 1541.08; OMB
Number 2060–0006; expiration date 2006. Control Number 2060–0183; expiration
December 31, 2005. (24) NESHAP for Reinforced Plastics date May 31, 2006.
(13) NSPS for Equipment Leaks of Composites Production (40 CFR Part 63, (35) NESHAP for the Surface Coating
VOC in Petroleum Refineries (40 CFR Subpart WWWW); Docket ID Number of Large Household and Commercial
Part 60, Subpart GGG); Docket ID OECA–2005–0049; EPA ICR Number Appliances (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart
Number OECA–2005–0018; EPA ICR 1976.03; OMB Control Number 2060– NNNN); Docket ID Number OECA–
Number 0983.08; OMB Control Number 0509; expiration date May 31, 2006. 2005–0042; EPA ICR Number 1954.03;
2060–0067; expiration date December (25) NESHAP for Publicly Owned OMB Control Number 2060–0457;
31, 2005. Treatment Works (40 CFR Part 63, expiration date May 31, 2006.
(14) NSPS for Glass Manufacturing Subpart VVV); Docket ID Number (36) State and Federal Emission
Plants (40 CFR Part 60, Subpart CC); OECA–2005–0035; EPA ICR Number Guidelines for Hospital/Medical/
Docket ID Number OECA–2005–0027; 1891.04; OMB Control Number 2060– Infectious Waste Incinerators (40 CFR
EPA ICR Number 1131.08; OMB Control 0428; expiration date May 31, 2006. Part 60, Subpart Ce and 40 CFR Part 62,
Number 2060–0054; expiration date (26) NESHAP for Metal Furniture Subpart HHH); Docket ID Number
December 31, 2005. Surface Coating (40 CFR Part 63, OECA–2005–0036; EPA ICR Number
(15) NESHAP for Wet-Formed Subpart RRRR); Docket ID Number 1899.03; OMB Control Number 2060–
Fiberglass Mat Production (40 CFR Part OECA–2005–0041; EPA ICR Number 0422; expiration date May 31, 2006.

VerDate jul<14>2003 18:03 May 05, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00062 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\06MYN1.SGM 06MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 87 / Friday, May 6, 2005 / Notices 24023

C. Contact Individuals for ICRs 2060–0420; expiration date December (17) NSPS for Beverage Can Surface
(1) NESHAP for Steel Pickling, HCl 31, 2005. Coating (40 CFR Part 60, Subpart WW);
(9) NSPS for Municipal Solid Waste Leonard Lazarus of the Office of
Process Facilities and Hydrochloric
Landfills (40 CFR Part 60, Subpart Compliance at (202) 564–6369 or via e-
Acid Regeneration Plants (40 CFR Part
WWW); Learia Williams of the Office of mail to: lazarus.leonard@epa.gov; EPA
63, Subpart CCC); Marı́a Malavé in the
Compliance at (202) 564–4113 or via e- ICR Number 0663.09; OMB Control
Office of Compliance at (202) 564–7027
mail to: williams.learia@epa.gov; EPA Number 2060–0001; expiration date
or via e-mail to: malave.maria@epa.gov;
ICR Number 1557.06; OMB Control April 30, 2006.
EPA ICR Number 1821.05; OMB Control
Number 2060–0220; expiration date (18) NSPS for Grain Elevators (40 CFR
Number 2060–0419; expiration date
October 31, 2005. Part 60, Subpart DD); Learia Williams of
October 31, 2005. (10) NSPS for Calciners and Dryers in the Office of Compliance at (202) 564–
(2) NESHAP for Portland Cement (40 Mineral Industries (40 CFR Part 60, 4113 or via e-mail to:
CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL); Leonard Subpart UUU); Learia Williams of the williams.learia@epa.gov; EPA ICR
Lazarus of the Office of Compliance at Office of Compliance at (202) 564–4113 Number 1130.08; OMB Control Number
(202) 564–6369 or via e-mail to: or via e-mail to: 2060–0082; expiration date April 30,
lazarus.leonard@epa.gov; EPA ICR williams.learia@epa.gov; EPA ICR 2006.
Number 1801.04; OMB Control Number Number 0746.06; OMB Control Number (19) NSPS for Kraft Pulp Mills (40
2060–0416; expiration date October 31, 2060–0251; expiration date December CFR Part 60, Subpart BB); Leonard
2005. 31, 2005. Lazarus of the Office of Compliance at
(3) NESHAP for Inorganic Arsenic (11) NSPS for Metal Coil Surface (202) 564–6369 or via e-mail to:
Emissions from Glass Manufacturing Coating (40 CFR Part 60, Subpart TT); lazarus.leonard@epa.gov; EPA ICR
Plants (40 CFR Part 61, Subpart N); Leonard Lazarus of the Office of Number 1055.08; OMB Control Number
Learia Williams of the Office of Compliance at (202) 564–6369 or via e- 2060–0021; expiration date April 30,
Compliance at (202) 564–4113 or via e- mail to: lazarus.leonard@epa.gov; EPA 2006.
mail to: williams.learia@epa.gov; EPA ICR Number 0660.09; OMB Control (20) NSPS for Lime Manufacturing (40
ICR Number 1081.08; OMB Control Number 2060–0107; expiration date CFR Part 60, Subpart HH); Learia
Number 2060–0043; expiration date December 31, 2005. Williams of the Office of Compliance at
October 31, 2005. (12) NSPS for Bulk Gasoline (202) 564–4113 or via e-mail to:
(4) NSPS for Sulfuric Acid Plants (40 Terminals (40 CFR Part 60, Subpart XX); williams.learia@epa.gov; EPA ICR
CFR Part 60, Subpart H); Learia Dan Chadwick of the Office of Number 1167.08; OMB Control Number
Williams of the Office of Compliance at Compliance at (202) 564–7054 or via e- 2060–0063; expiration date April 30,
(202) 564–4113 or via e-mail to: mail to chadwick.dan@epa.gov; EPA 2006.
williams.learia@epa.gov; EPA ICR ICR Number 0664.08; OMB Control (21) NSPS for Hot Mix Asphalt
Number 1057.10; OMB Control Number Number 2060–0006; expiration date Facilities (40 CFR Part 60, Subpart I);
2060–0041; expiration date October 31, December 31, 2005. Marı́e Malavé in the Office of
2005. (13) NSPS for Equipment Leaks of Compliance at (202) 564–7027 or via e-
(5) NSPS for Primary and Secondary VOC in Petroleum Refineries (40 CFR mail to: malave.maria@epa.gov; EPA
Emissions from Basic Oxygen Furnaces Part 60, Subpart GGG); Dan Chadwick of ICR Number 1127.08; OMB Control
(40 CFR Part 60, Subparts N and Na); the Office of Compliance at (202) 564– Number 2060–0083; expiration date
Marı́a Malavé in the Office of 7054 or via e-mail to April 31, 2006.
Compliance at (202) 564–7027 or via e- chadwick.dan@epa.gov; EPA ICR (22) NESHAP for Municipal Solid
mail to: malave.maria@epa.gov; EPA Number 0983.08; OMB Control Number Waste Landfills (40 CFR Part 63,
ICR Number 1069.08; OMB Control 2060–0067; expiration date December Subpart AAAA); Learia Williams of the
Number 2060–0029; expiration date 31, 2005. Office of Compliance at (202) 564–4113
October 31, 2005. (14) NSPS for Glass Manufacturing or via e-mail to:
(6) NESHAP for Primary Lead Plants (40 CFR Part 60, Subpart CC); williams.learia@epa.gov; EPA ICR
Smelters (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart TTT); Learia Williams of the Office of Number 1938.03; OMB Control Number
Marı́a Malavé in the Office of Compliance at (202) 564–4113 or via e- 2060–0505; expiration date April 30,
Compliance at (202) 564–7027 or via e- mail to: williams.learia@epa.gov; EPA 2006.
mail to: malave.maria@epa.gov; EPA ICR Number 1131.08; OMB Control (23) NESHAP for the Wood Building
ICR Number 1856.05; OMB Control Number 2060–0054; expiration date Products Surface Coating Industry (40
Number 2060–0414; expiration date December 31, 2005. CFR Part 63, Subpart WWWW); Leonard
October 31, 2005. (15) NESHAP for Wet-Formed Lazarus of the Office of Compliance at
(7) NSPS for Petroleum Refineries (40 Fiberglass Mat Production (40 CFR Part (202) 564–6369 or via e-mail to:
CFR Part 60, Subpart J); Dan Chadwick 63, Subpart HHHH); Marı́a Malavé in lazarus.leonard@epa.gov; EPA ICR
of the Office of Compliance at (202) the Office of Compliance at (202) 564– Number 2034.03; OMB Control Number
564–7054 or via e-mail to 7027 or via e-mail to: 2060–0510; expiration date May 31,
chadwick.dan@epa.gov; EPA ICR malave.maria@epa.gov; EPA ICR 2006.
Number 1054.09; OMB Control Number Number 1964.03; OMB Control Number (24) NESHAP for Reinforced Plastics
2060–0022; expiration date November 2060–0496; expiration date December Composites Production (40 CFR Part 63,
30, 2005. 31, 2005. Subpart WWWW); Marı́a Malavé in the
(8) NESHAP for Source Categories (16) NESHAP for Asbestos (40 CFR Office of Compliance at (202) 564–7027
Generic Maximum Achievable Control Part 61, Subpart M); Dan Chadwick of or via e-mail to: malave.maria@epa.gov;
Technology Standards (40 CFR Part 63, the Office of Compliance at (202) 564– EPA ICR Number 1976.03; OMB Control
Subpart YY); Learia Williams of the 7054 or via e-mail to Number 2060–0509; expiration date
Office of Compliance at (202) 564–4113 chadwick.dan@epa.gov; EPA ICR May 31, 2006.
or via e-mail to: Number 0111.11; OMB Control Number (25) NESHAP for Publicly Owned
williams.learia@epa.gov; EPA ICR 2060–0101; expiration date March 31, Treatment Works (40 CFR Part 63,
Number 1871.04; OMB Control Number 2006. Subpart VVV); Gregory Fried of the

VerDate jul<14>2003 18:03 May 05, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00063 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\06MYN1.SGM 06MYN1
24024 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 87 / Friday, May 6, 2005 / Notices

Office of Compliance at (202) 564–7016 Office of Compliance at (202) 564–4113 Part 63, Subpart A), respondents submit
or via e-mail to: fried.gregory@epa.gov; or via e-mail to: one-time notifications of applicability
EPA ICR Number 1891.04; OMB Control williams.learia@epa.gov; EPA ICR and a one-time report on the
Number 2060–0428; expiration date Number 2022.03; OMB Control Number performance test results for the primary
May 31, 2006. 2060–0508; expiration date May 31, emission control device. Plants also
(26) NESHAP for Metal Furniture 2006. must develop and implement a startup,
Surface Coating (40 CFR Part 63, (34) NESHAP for Benzene Waste shutdown, and malfunction Plan.
Subpart RRRR); Leonard Lazarus of the Operations (40 CFR Part 61, Subpart Sources are required to submit
Office of Compliance at (202) 564–6369 FF); Dan Chadwick of the Office of semiannual reports including periods of
or via e-mail to: Compliance at (202) 564–7054 or via e- exceedances or a statement of
lazarus.leonard@epa.gov; EPA ICR mail to chadwick.dan@epa.gov; EPA compliance certifying that no
Number 1952.03; OMB Control Number ICR Number 1541.08; OMB Control exceedances have occurred. The
2060–0518; expiration date May 31, Number 2060–0183; expiration date standard also requires the owner or
2006. May 31, 2006. operator to submit a written
(27) NESHAP for Asphalt Processing (35) NESHAP for the Surface Coating maintenance plan for each emission
and Asphalt Roofing Manufacturing (40 of Large Household and Commercial control device. Records shall be
CFR Part 63, Subpart LLLLL); Marı́e Appliances (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart maintained for a period of five years.
Malavé in the Office of Compliance at NNNN); Leonard Lazarus of the Office Records of the most recent two years of
(202) 564–7027 or via e-mail to: of Compliance at (202) 564–6369 or via operation must be maintained onsite.
malave.maria@epa.gov; EPA ICR e-mail to: lazarus.leonard@epa.gov; EPA Burden Statement: In the previously
Number 2029.03; OMB Control Number ICR Number 1954.03; OMB Control approved ICR, the estimated number of
2060–0520; expiration date May 31, Number 2060–0457; expiration date respondents for this information
2006. May 31, 2006. collection was 71 with 231 responses
(28) NESHAP for Flexible (36) State and Federal Emission per year. The annual industry reporting
Polyurethane Foam Fabrication 40 CFR Guidelines for Hospital/Medical/ and recordkeeping burden for this
Part 63, Subpart MMMMM); Learia Infectious Waste Incinerators (40 CFR collection of information was 25,104
Williams of the Office of Compliance at Part 60, Subpart Ce and 40 CFR Part 62, hours. On average, each respondent
(202) 564–4113 or via e-mail to: Subpart HHH); Gregory Fried of the reported 3.3 times per year and spent
williams.learia@epa.gov; EPA ICR Office of Compliance at (202) 564–7016 109 hours preparing each response.
Number 2027.03; OMB Control Number or via e-mail to: fried.gregory@epa.gov; The total annualized cost for
2060–0516; expiration date May 31, EPA ICR Number 1899.03; OMB Control continuous emissions monitoring was
2006. Number 2060–0422; expiration date
(29) NESHAP for Paper and Other $8,388, which was comprised of capital/
May 31, 2006. startup costs of $830 for and operation
Web Coating (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart
JJJJ); Learia Williams of the Office of D. Information for Individual ICRs and maintenance (O&M) costs of $7,558.
Compliance at (202) 564–4113 or via e- (1) NESHAP for Steel Pickling, HCl (2) NESHAP for Portland Cement (40
mail to: williams.learia@epa.gov; EPA Process Facilities and Hydrochloric CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL); EPA ICR
ICR Number 1951.03; OMB Control Acid Regeneration Plants (40 CFR Part Number 1801.04; OMB Control Number
Number 2060–0511; expiration date 63, Subpart CCC); EPA ICR Number 2060–0416; expiration date October 31,
May 31, 2006. 1821.05; OMB Control Number 2060– 2005.
(30) NESHAP for Coke Oven Pushing 0419; expiration date October 31, 2005. Affected Entities: Entities potentially
Quenching and Battery Stacks (40 CFR Affected Entities: Entities potentially affected by this action are owners or
Part 63, Subpart CCCCC); Marı́e Malavé affected by this action are facilities that operators of portland cement
in the Office of Compliance at (202) pickle steel using hydrochloric acid or manufacturing plants.
564–7027 or via e-mail to: regenerate hydrochloric acid. Abstract: The National Emission
malave.maria@epa.gov; EPA ICR Abstract: The National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants
Number 1995.03; OMB Control Number Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Portland Cement were
2060–0521; expiration date May 31, (NESHAP) for Steel Pickling, published promulgated on June 14, 1999. The
2006. at 40 CFR part 63, subpart CCC, were affected entities are subject to the
(31) NESHAP for Printing, Coating proposed on September 18, 1997 (62 FR General Provisions of the National
and Dyeing of Fabrics and Other 49051), and promulgated on June 22, Emission Standards for Hazardous Air
Textiles (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart 1999 (64 FR 33202). This standard Pollutants (NESHAP) at 40 CFR part 63,
OOOO); Learia Williams of the Office of establishes limits for hydrochloric acid subpart A that apply to all NESHAP
Compliance at (202) 564–4113 or via e- emissions from continuous and batch sources. These requirements include
mail to: williams.learia@epa.gov; EPA pickling lines and acid regeneration recordkeeping and reporting for startup,
ICR Number 2071.03; OMB Control units and limits for chlorine emissions shutdown, malfunctions, and
Number 2060–0522; expiration date from acid regeneration units. Also, semiannual reporting. Exceptions to the
May 31, 2006. operational and equipment standards General Provisions for this source
(32) NESHAP for Refractory Products are established for stationary acid category are delineated in the standard
Manufacturing (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart storage vessels. and include initial notifications to the
SSSSS); Learia Williams of the Office of The monitoring, recordkeeping, and Agency for new, reconstructed and
Compliance at (202) 564–4113 or via e- reporting requirements outlined in the existing.
mail to: williams.learia@epa.gov; EPA standard are the same as those required Respondents submit notifications and
ICR Number 2040.03; OMB Control for other NESHAP standards. Plants reports of performance test results.
Number 2060–0515; expiration date must demonstrate compliance with the Respondents must also: Develop and
May 31, 2006. emission standards by monitoring their implement a startup, shutdown and a
(33) NESHAP for Brick and Structural control devices and performing annual malfunction plan; submit semiannual
Clay Manufacturing (40 CFR Part 63, emissions testing. Consistent with the reports; develop and implement an
Subpart JJJJJ); Learia Williams of the NESHAP General Provisions (40 CFR operations and maintenance plan;

VerDate jul<14>2003 18:03 May 05, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00064 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\06MYN1.SGM 06MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 87 / Friday, May 6, 2005 / Notices 24025

conduct and report the results of an annualized cost was $98,000, which was primary emissions from BOPF, merged
annual combustion system inspection. comprised of no capital/startup costs with Standards of Performance for
Burden Statement: In the previously and operation and maintenance costs of Secondary Emissions from Basic
approved ICR, the estimated number of $98,000. Oxygen Process Steelmaking Facilities
respondents for this information (4) NSPS for Sulfuric Acid Plants (40 (40 CFR part 60, subpart Na). Subpart
collection was 107 with 214 responses CFR Part 60, Subpart H); EPA ICR Na is applicable to any top-blown
per year. The annual industry reporting Number 1057.10; OMB Control Number BOPF, hot metal transfer station or
and recordkeeping burden for this 2060–0041; expiration date October 31, skimming station for which
collection of information was 53,181 2005. construction, reconstruction, or
hours. On average, each respondent Affected Entities: Entities potentially modification commenced after January
reported 2.0 times per year and 249 affected by this action are any sulfuric 20, 1983.
hours were spent preparing each acid plants. The affected entities are subject to the
response. The total annualized cost was Abstract: The New Source General Provision of the National
$685,000, which was comprised of no Performance Standards (NSPS) for Emission Standards for Hazardous Air
capital/startup costs and operation and Sulfuric Acid Plants (40 CFR Part 60, Pollutants (NESHAP) at 40 CFR part 63,
maintenance costs of $685,000. Subpart H) were proposed on August subpart A and any changes, or additions
(3) NESHAP for Inorganic Arsenic 17, 1971 and promulgated on December to the General Provisions specified at 40
Emissions from Glass Manufacturing 23, 1971. The affected entities are CFR part 63, subparts N and Na. NSPS
Plants (40 CFR Part 61, Subpart N); EPA subject to the General Provision of the standards require sources to submit
ICR Number 1081.08; OMB Control New Source Performance Standards initial notifications, conduct
Number 2060–0043; expiration date (NSPS) at 40 CFR part 60, subpart A and performance tests, and submit periodic
October 31, 2005. any changes, or additions to the General reports. Owners or operators are also
Affected Entities: Entities potentially Provisions specified at 40 CFR part 60, required to maintain records of the
affected by this action are each glass subpart H. These standards apply to any occurrence and duration of any startup,
melting furnace that uses commercial sulfuric acid facility commencing shutdown, or malfunction in the
arsenic as a raw material. These construction, modification or operation of an affected facility, or any
standards do not apply to pot furnaces. reconstruction after the date of proposal. period during which the monitoring
In addition, rebricking is not considered In general, all NSPS standards require system is inoperative. Monitoring
construction or modification for the initial notifications, performance tests, requirements specific to BOPF shops
purposes of this standard. and periodic reports. Owners or subject to NSPS subparts N and Na
Abstract: The National Emission operators are also required to maintain provide information on the operation of
Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants records of the occurrence and duration the emissions control device and
(NESHAP) for Inorganic Arsenic of any startup, shutdown, or compliance with the mass and visible
Emissions from Glass Manufacturing malfunction in the operation of an emission standards. Semiannual reports
Plants (40 CFR Part 61, Subpart N) were affected facility, or any period during of measurements that average 10 percent
proposed on July 20, 1983, and which the monitoring system is below the average measurements
promulgated on August 4, 1986. The inoperative. obtained during performance tests are
standards were amended on May 31, Burden Statement: In the previously required.
1990, to add an alternative test method. approved ICR, the estimated number of Burden Statement: In the previously
The affected entities are subject to the respondents for this information approved ICR, the estimated number of
General Provision of the National collection was 106 with 212 responses respondents for this information
Emission Standards for Hazardous Air per year. The annual industry reporting collection was four with ten responses
Pollutants (NESHAP) at 40 CFR part 61, and recordkeeping burden for this per year. The annual industry reporting
subpart A and any changes, or additions collection of information was 23,320 and recordkeeping burden for this
to the General Provisions specified at 40 hours. On average, each respondent collection of information was 1,012
CFR part 61, subpart N. reported 2.0 times per year and 110 hours. On average, each respondent
In general, all NESHAP standards hours were spent preparing each reported 2.5 times per year and spent
require initial notifications, response. The responses were prepared 101 hours preparing each response.
performance tests, and periodic reports. semiannually. The total annualized cost The total annualized cost for
Owners or operators are also required to was $477,000, which was comprised of continuous emissions monitoring was
maintain records of the occurrence and no capital/startup cost and operation $25,794, which was comprised of
duration of any startup, shutdown, or and maintenance costs of $477,000. capital/startup costs of $18,000 and
malfunction in the operation of an (5) NSPS for Primary and Secondary operation and maintenance (O&M) costs
affected facility, or any period during Emissions from Basic Oxygen Furnaces of $7,794.
which the monitoring system is (40 CFR Part 60, Subparts N and Na); (6) NESHAP for Primary Lead
inoperative. These notifications, reports, EPA ICR Number 1069.08; OMB Control Smelters (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart TTT);
and records are essential in determining Number 2060–0029; expiration date EPA ICR Number 1856.05; OMB Control
compliance, and are required of all October 31, 2005. Number 2060–0414; expiration date is
sources subject to NESHAP. Affected Entities: Entities potentially October 31, 2005.
Burden Statement: In the previously affected by this action are sources with Affected Entities: Entities potentially
approved ICR, the estimated number of basic oxygen process furnace shops. affected by this action are sources with
respondents for this information Abstract: The New Source primary lead smelters.
collection was 28 with 31 responses per Performance Standards (NSPS) for Abstract: The National Emission
year. The annual industry reporting and Primary Emissions from Basic Oxygen Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants
recordkeeping burden for this collection Process Furnaces (BOPF) (40 CFR part (NESHAP) for Primary Lead Smelters,
of information was 4,524 hours. On 60, subpart N) were proposed on June published at 40 CFR part 63, subpart
average, each respondent reported 1.1 11, 1973, and promulgated on March 8, TTT, were proposed on April 17, 1998
times per year and 146 hours were spent 1974. On January 20, 1983, amendments (63 FR 19200), and promulgated on June
preparing each response. The total to the standards of performance for 4, 1999 (64 FR 30204). On February 12,

VerDate jul<14>2003 18:03 May 05, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00065 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\06MYN1.SGM 06MYN1
24026 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 87 / Friday, May 6, 2005 / Notices

1999, the Agency publicized a Affected Entities: Entities potentially made additional amendments as a direct
supplemental standard for ferroalloys, affected by this action are petroleum ruling to the Generic MACT to clarify
mineral wool, primary copper, primary refineries. definitions and the recordkeeping
lead and wool fiberglass which Abstract: The New Source provisions related to how readily
enhanced the requirements for bag leak Performance Standards (NSPS) for accessible records should be
detection systems in 40 CFR 63.1625 Petroleum Refineries was promulgated maintained.
and 40 CFR 63.1655 by including an on March 8, 1974. The affected entities The affected entities are subject to the
enforceable operating limit in this are subject to the General Provisions of General Provision of the National
standard. the NSPS at 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart A Emission Standards for Hazardous Air
and any changes, or additions to the Pollutants (NESHAP) at 40 CFR part 63,
The monitoring, recordkeeping, and
General Provisions specified at 40 CFR subpart A and any changes, or additions
reporting requirements outlined in the
Part 60, Subpart J. In general, all NSPS to the General Provisions specified at 40
standard are similar to those required
require initial notifications, CFR part 63, subpart YY. In general,
for other NESHAP standards. Plants
performance tests, and periodic reports. NESHAP standards require initial
must demonstrate compliance with the
Owners or operators are also required to notifications, performance tests, and
emission standards by monitoring their
maintain records of the occurrence and periodic reports. Owners or operators
control devices and performing annual
duration of any startup, shutdown, or are also required to maintain records of
emissions testing. Consistent with the
malfunction in the operation of an the occurrence and duration of any
NESHAP General Provisions (40 CFR affected facility, or any period during startup, shutdown, or malfunction in
Part 63, Subpart A), all sources subject which the monitoring system is the operation of an affected facility, or
to this standard are required to submit inoperative. any period during which the monitoring
one-time notifications of applicability; a Burden Statement: In the previously system is inoperative. The specific
one-time report on performance test approved ICR, the estimated number of monitoring and recordkeeping
results for the primary emission control respondents for this information requirements vary for each source
device; an initial report specifying the collection was 240 with 240 responses category depending on the types of
intended methods of compliance; per year. The annual industry reporting emissions control equipment and
standard operating procedure manuals and recordkeeping burden for this monitoring equipment used to comply
for baghouses and fugitive dust control; collection of information was 17,359 with the Generic MACT standards for
and a semiannual report that includes a hours. Each respondent reported 1.0 their category. These notifications,
summary of the monitoring results, any times per year and the average public reports, and records are essential in
baghouse leak detection system alarms reporting and recordkeeping burden for determining compliance, and are
and corrective actions. Sources must this collection is estimated to be 72 required of all sources subject to
also maintain records of production for hours per response. The responses were NESHAP.
unrefined lead, copper matte, and prepared semiannually. There were no Burden Statement: In the previously
copper species; the date and times of capital/startup costs. However, there approved ICR, the estimated number of
bag leak detection system alarms and were operation and maintenance costs respondents for this information
the corrective action taken; baghouse in the previous ICR of $91,000. collection was 10 with 30 responses per
inspection and maintenance; any (8) NESHAP for Source Categories year. The annual industry reporting and
records required as part of the source Generic Maximum Achievable Control recordkeeping burden for this collection
standard operating procedures manuals; Technology Standards (40 CFR Part 63, of information was 4,077 hours. On
and the compliance methods chosen. Subpart YY); EPA ICR Number 1871.04; average, each respondent reported 3.0
These notifications, reports, and records OMB Control Number 2060–0420; times per year and 136 hours were spent
are essential in determining compliance, expiration date December 31, 2005. preparing each response. The responses
and are required of all sources subject Affected Entities: Entities potentially were prepared semiannually. The total
to NESHAP. affected by this action are plants annualized cost was $107,000, which
Burden Statement: In the previously producing polycarbonates, acrylic and was comprised of no capital/startup
approved ICR, the estimated number of modacrylic fibers, acetal resins and costs and operation and maintenance
respondents for this information hydrogen fluoride. costs of $107,000.
collection was two with four responses Abstract: The National Emission (9) NSPS for Municipal Solid Waste
per year. The annual industry reporting Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants Landfills (40 CFR Part 60, Subpart
and recordkeeping burden for this (NESHAP) for Source Categories: WWW); EPA ICR Number 1557.06; OMB
collection of information was 12,273 Generic Maximum Achievable Control Control Number 2060–0220; expiration
hours. On average, each respondent Technology (hereafter, this subpart is date October 31, 2005.
reported 2.0 times per year and spent referred to as the ‘‘Generic MACT’’) Affected Entities: Entities potentially
3,068 hours preparing each response. were proposed on October 14, 1998 at affected by this action are municipal
The responses were prepared to meet 63 FR 55178 and promulgated on June solid waste landfills.
semiannual reporting requirements. 29, 1999 at 64 FR 34854. The standards Abstract: The New Source
apply to hazardous air pollutant Performance Standards (NSPS) for
The total annualized cost associated emissions in four source categories: Municipal Solid Waste Landfills (40
with continuous emissions monitoring polycarbonates production, acrylic and CFR Part 60, Subpart WWW) were
was $6,452 which was comprised of modacrylic fibers Production, acetal proposed on May 30, 1991 and
capital/startup costs of $4,000 and resins production and hydrogen fluoride promulgated on March 12, 1996. The
operation and maintenance costs of production. On November 2, 2001, the affected entities are subject to the
$2,452. Agency promulgated wastewater General Provision of the New Source
(7) NSPS for Petroleum Refineries (40 provisions amendments to the Generic Performance Standards (NSPS) at 40
CFR Part 60, subpart J), EPA ICR MACT applicable to wastewater streams CFR part 60, subpart A and any changes,
Number 1054.09; OMB Control Number for the first three categories. The last or additions to the General Provisions
2060–0022; expiration date November category does not have wastewater specified at 40 CFR part 60, subpart
30, 2005. streams. On June 7, 2002, the Agency WWW. Owners and operators of the

VerDate jul<14>2003 18:03 May 05, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00066 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\06MYN1.SGM 06MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 87 / Friday, May 6, 2005 / Notices 24027

affected facilities must make initial collection of information was 6,506 using an emission control device, each
reports when a source becomes subject hours. On average, each respondent owner or operator shall include in the
to this standard: (1) To conduct and reported 2.1 times per year and 19 hours initial compliance report the overall
report on performance tests, (2) report of were spent preparing each response. VOC destruction rate used to attain
annual or periodic emission rates, (3) The responses were prepared compliance and the combustion
report on design plans, (4) report on semiannually. The total annualized cost temperature of the thermal incinerator,
equipment removal and closure, (5) was $115,000, which was comprised of or the gas temperature both upstream
maintain records of the reports, system capital/startup costs of $8,000 and and downstream of the incinerator
design and performance tests, operation and maintenance costs of catalyst bed. The standards also require
monitoring and exceedances, plot map, $107,000. reports of incinerator temperature drop.
and well locations. The recordkeeping (11) NSPS for Metal Coil Surface Burden Statement: In the previously
and reporting requirements are specific Coating (40 CFR Part 60, Subpart TT); approved ICR, the estimated number of
to municipal solid waste landfills. EPA ICR Number 0660.09; OMB Control respondents for this information
Burden Statement: In the previously Number 2060–0107; expiration date collection was 165 with 404 responses
approved ICR, the estimated number of December 31, 2005. per year. The annual industry reporting
respondents for this information Affected Entities: Entities potentially and recordkeeping burden for this
collection was 175 with 299 responses affected by this action are owners or collection of information was 14,531
per year. The annual industry reporting operators of metal coil surface coating hours. On average, each respondent
and recordkeeping burden for this facilities. reported approximately 2.4 times per
collection of information was 3,390 Abstract: The New Source year and 36 hours were spent preparing
hours. On average, each respondent Performance Standards (NSPS) for Metal each response. The total annualized cost
reported 1.7 times per year and 11 hours Coil Surface Coating were promulgated was $318,000, which was comprised of
were spent preparing each response. on November 1, 1982. These standards capital/startup costs of $28,000 and
The responses were prepared annually apply to metal coil surface coating operation and maintenance costs of
and quarterly. The total annualized cost facilities commencing construction, $290,000.
was $107,000, which was comprised of modification or reconstruction after (12) NSPS for Bulk Gasoline
capital/startup costs of $105,000 and January 5, 1981. Terminals (40 CFR Part 60, subpart XX),
operation and maintenance costs of The affected entities are subject to the EPA ICR Number 0664.08; OMB Control
$2,000. General Provisions of the NSPS at 40 Number 2060–0006; expiration date
(10) NSPS for Calciners and Dryers in CFR part 60, subpart A that apply to all December 31, 2005.
Mineral Industries (40 CFR Part 60, NSPS sources. These requirements Affected Entities: Entities potentially
Subpart UUU); EPA ICR Number include recordkeeping and reporting for affected by this action are Bulk Gasoline
0746.06; OMB Control Number 2060– startup, shutdown, malfunctions and Terminals which deliver liquid product
0251; expiration date December 31, quarterly or semiannual reporting. into gasoline tank trucks.
2005. Exceptions to the General Provisions for Abstract: The New Source
Affected Entities: Entities potentially this source category are delineated in Performance Standards (NSPS) for Bulk
affected by this action are calciners and the standard and include initial Gasoline Terminals were promulgated
dryers at mineral processing plants. notifications to the Agency for new, on August 18, 1983, and amended on
Entities subject to NSPS 40 CFR part 60, reconstructed and existing affected December 22, 1983. The affected entities
subpart LL for metallic mineral entities. are subject to the General Provisions of
processing plants are not subject to this Owners or operators of the affected the NSPS at 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart A
standard. facilities must make the following one- and any changes, or additions to the
Abstract: The New Source time-only reports: Notification of the General Provisions specified at 40 CFR
Performance Standards (NSPS) for date of construction or reconstruction; Part 60, Subpart XX. Owners or
Calciners and Dryers in Mineral notification of the anticipated and operators of the affected facilities
Industries (40 CFR Part 60, Subpart actual dates of a startup; notification of subject to NSPS subpart XX must make
UUU) were proposed on April 23, 1986, any physical or operational change to an the following one-time only reports:
and promulgated on September 28, existing facility which may increase the notification of the date of construction
1992. The affected entities are subject to regulated pollutant emission rate; or reconstruction; notification of the
the General Provision of the New Source notification of the date of the initial anticipated and actual dates of startup;
Performance Standards (NSPS) at 40 performance test; and results of the notification of any physical or
CFR part 60, subpart A and any changes, initial performance test. Owners or operational change to an existing facility
or additions to the General Provisions operators are also required to maintain which may increase the regulated
specified at 40 CFR part 60, subpart records of the occurrence and duration pollutant emission rate; notification of
UUU. NSPS standards require initial of any startup, shutdown, or the date of the initial performance test;
notifications, performance tests, and malfunction in the operation of an and the results of the initial
periodic reports. Owners or operators affected facility, or any period during performance test. Owners or operators
are also required to maintain records of which the monitoring system is are also required to maintain records of
the occurrence and duration of any inoperative. Where compliance is the occurrence and duration of any
startup, shutdown, or malfunction in achieved through the use of low volatile startup, shutdown, or malfunction in
the operation of an affected facility, or (VOC)coatings without emission control the operation of an affected facility, or
any period during which the monitoring devices, or through the use of higher any period during which the monitoring
system is inoperative. VOC content coating in conjunction system is inoperative.
Burden Statement: In the previously with emission control devices, each Burden Statement: In the previously
approved ICR, the estimated number of owner or operator shall include in the approved ICR, the estimated number of
respondents for this information initial compliance report the weighted respondents for this information
collection was 165 with 342 responses average of the VOC content of coatings collection was 40 with 40 responses per
per year. The annual industry reporting used during the period of each calendar year. The annual industry reporting and
and recordkeeping burden for this month. When compliance is achieved recordkeeping burden for this collection

VerDate jul<14>2003 18:03 May 05, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00067 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\06MYN1.SGM 06MYN1
24028 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 87 / Friday, May 6, 2005 / Notices

of information was 11,420 hours. Each hours per response. There were no Owners and operators of affected
respondent provided 1.0 responses per capital/startup costs or operation and sources are subject to the monitoring,
year. The average public reporting and maintenance costs associated with recordkeeping and reporting
recordkeeping burden for this collection continuous emission monitoring in the requirements of 40 CFR part 63, subpart
is estimated to be 286 hours per previous ICR. A, the General Provisions, unless
response. The responses were prepared (14) NSPS for Glass Manufacturing specified otherwise in subpart HHHH.
at one time only. There were no capital/ Plants (40 CFR Part 60, Subpart CC); This standard requires sources to submit
startup costs or operation and EPA ICR Number 1131.08; OMB Control initial notifications, conduct
maintenance costs associated with Number 2060–0054; expiration date performance tests, and submit periodic
continuous emission monitoring in the December 31, 2005. reports. In addition, sources are
previous ICR. Affected Entities: Entities potentially required to maintain records of the
(13) NSPS for Equipment Leaks of affected by this action are the glass occurrence and duration of any startup,
VOC in Petroleum Refineries (40 CFR melting furnaces located at a glass shutdown, or malfunction in the
Part 60, subpart GGG), EPA ICR Number manufacturing plants. operation of an affected facility; any
0983.08; OMB Control Number 2060– Abstract: The New Source period during which the monitoring
0067; expiration date December 31, Performance Standards (NSPS) for 40 system is inoperative; bag leak detection
2005. CFR Part 60, Subpart CC were proposed system alarms, including corrective
Affected Entities: Entities potentially on June 15, 1979, promulgated on actions; parametric monitoring data;
affected by this action are compressors October 7, 1980, and amended on system maintenance and calibration;
and all equipment within a process unit October 19, 1984. The affected entities and opacity and visible emissions
at petroleum refineries. are subject to the General Provision of observations to demonstrate initial and
Abstract: The New Source the New Source Performance Standards ongoing compliance with the standard.
Performance Standards (NSPS) for (NSPS) at 40 CFR part 60, subpart A and Burden Statement: In the previously
Equipment Leaks of VOC (Volatile any changes, or additions to the General approved ICR, the estimated number of
Organic Compounds) in Petroleum Provisions specified at 40 CFR part 60, respondents for this information
Refineries were promulgated on May 30, subpart CC. These standards apply to collection was 14 with 14 responses per
1984. The affected entities are subject to each glass melting furnace located at a year. The annual industry reporting and
the General Provisions of the NSPS at 40 glass manufacturing plant. NSPS recordkeeping burden for this collection
CFR Part 60, Subpart A and any standards require initial notifications, of information was 2,983 hours. On
changes, or additions to the General performance tests, and periodic reports. average, each respondent reported 1.0
Provisions specified at 40 CFR Part 60, Owners or operators are also required to times per year and spent 213 hours
Subpart GGG. Facilities subject to this maintain records of the occurrence and preparing each response.
NSPS require initial notifications, duration of any startup, shutdown, or The total annualized cost for
performance tests, and periodic reports. malfunction in the operation of an continuous emissions monitoring was
Owners or operators are also required to affected facility, or any period during $2,333, which was comprised of capital/
maintain records of the occurrence and which the monitoring system is startup costs only. This cost is based on
duration of any startup, shutdown, or inoperative. seven facilities installing continuous
malfunction in the operation of an Burden Statement: In the previously emission monitors. There were no
affected facility, or any period during approved ICR, the estimated number of operation and maintenance costs
which the monitoring system is respondents for this information associated with continuous emission
inoperative. Monitoring requirements collection was 45 with 87 responses per monitoring in the previous ICR.
specific to NSPS subpart GGG provide year. The annual industry reporting and (16) NESHAP for Asbestos (40 CFR
information on which components are recordkeeping burden for this collection Part 61, Subpart M), EPA ICR Number
leaking VOCs. NSPS subpart GGG of information was 590 hours. On 0111.11; OMB Control Number 2060–
references the compliance requirements average, each respondent reported 1.9 0101; expiration date March 31, 2006.
of NSPS subpart VV. Owners or times per year and seven hours were Affected Entities: Entities potentially
operators are required to periodically spent preparing each response. The affected by this action are: (1) Those
record information identifying leaking responses were prepared semiannually. where demolition and renovation of
equipment, repair methods used to stop The total annualized cost was $261,000, facilities are taking place, (2) those
the leaks, and dates of repair. The which was comprised of no capital/ where disposal of asbestos is taking
responses were prepared weekly, startup costs and operation and place, (3) those where asbestos milling,
monthly, quarterly, semiannually, maintenance costs of $261,000. manufacturing and fabricating are taking
annually and one time only for initial (15) NESHAP for Wet-Formed place, (4) those where asbestos is being
notifications. In addition, semiannual Fiberglass Mat Production (40 CFR Part used on roadways, (5) those where
reports are required to measure 63, Subpart HHHH); EPA ICR Number asbestos waste is being converted, and
compliance with the standards of NSPS 1964.03; OMB Control Number 2060– (6) those where asbestos is used in
subpart VV as referenced by NSPS 0496; expiration date December 31, insulation and sprayed on materials.
subpart GGG. 2005. Abstract: The NESHAP for Asbestos
Burden Statement: In the previously Affected Entities: Entities potentially was promulgated on November 20,
approved ICR, the estimated number of affected by this action are component 1990. The affected entities are subject to
respondents for this information processes at wet-formed fiberglass mat the General Provisions of the NESHAP
collection was 48 with 102 responses production facilities. at 40 CFR Part 61, Subpart A and any
per year. The annual industry reporting Abstract: The National Emission changes or additions to the General
and recordkeeping burden for this Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants Provisions specified at 40 CFR Part 61,
collection of information was 6,137 (NESHAP) for Primary Lead Smelters, Subpart M.
hours. Each respondent provided 2.1 published at 40 CFR part 63, subpart Owners or operators of the affected
responses per year. The average public HHHH, were proposed on May 26, 2000 milling, manufacturing, fabricating,
reporting and recordkeeping burden for (65 FR 34251), and promulgated on waste disposal, and waste conversion
this collection is estimated to be 60 April 11, 2002 (67 FR 17823). facilities must make the following one-

VerDate jul<14>2003 18:03 May 05, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00068 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\06MYN1.SGM 06MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 87 / Friday, May 6, 2005 / Notices 24029

time-only reports: notification of the temperatures to take temperature Affected Entities: Entities potentially
date of construction or reconstruction; readings throughout the day and record affected by this action are owners and
notification of the anticipated and the information. The provisions require operators of beverage can surface
actual dates of startup; notification of that all containers of asbestos waste be coating facilities.
any physical or operational change to an labeled including the name of the waste Abstract: The New Source
existing facility which may increase the generator and the location of where the Performance Standards (NSPS) for
regulated pollutant emission rate. waste was generated. Owners or Beverage Can Surface Coating were
Owners or operators are also required to operators of demolitions and promulgated on August 25, 1983.
maintain records of the occurrence and renovations are required to prepare and The affected entities are subject to the
duration of any startup, shutdown, or maintain records of each waste General Provisions of the New Source
malfunction in the operation of an shipment as to its destination, the Performance Standards (NSPS) at 40
affected facility, or any period during quantity of waste, and the date of CFR part 60, subpart A that apply to all
which the monitoring system is shipment, and to furnish a copy of the NSPS sources. These requirements
inoperative. record to disposal site owners or include recordkeeping and reporting for
The recordkeeping requirements for operators. The standard also requires startup, shutdown, malfunctions, and
the facilities mentioned above consist of that the generators of asbestos waste semiannual reporting. Exceptions to the
the occurrence and duration of any attempt to reconcile instances in which General Provisions for this source
startup and malfunction as described. a signed copy of the waste shipment category are delineated in the standard
They include the initial performance record is not received from the disposal and include initial notifications to the
test results including information site and that the generator notify the Agency for new, reconstructed and
necessary to determine the conditions of Agency if delivery to the disposal site existing affected entities. Volatile
the performance test, and performance cannot be confirmed. organic compounds (VOC) are the
test measurements and results, Owners and operators of waste pollutants regulated under the
including monitoring each potential disposal sites are required to document standards.
source of asbestos emissions for visible Respondents potentially affected by
all asbestos waste shipments that are
emissions to the outside air and this action are facilities in the beverage
received and send a copy of each record
inspecting air cleaning devices to ensure can surface coating industry including:
back to the generator. A record of the
proper operation. Records of startups, each exterior base coat operation, each
location and quantity of asbestos in the
shutdowns, and malfunctions should be over varnish coating operation, and each
landfill is required as well as noting the inside spray coating operation. These
noted as they occur. The reporting presence and location of asbestos in the
requirements for this industry include standards apply to coating facilities
landfill property deed. Disposal site commencing construction, modification
the initial notifications, performance owners and operators have to report to
test results and quarterly reports of or reconstruction after November 26,
EPA any discrepancies between the 1980.
instances when visible emissions are amount of waste designated on the
observed at any time during the quarter. Owners or operators of the affected
waste shipment record and the amount facilities described must make the
Owners and operators of demolitions
actually received, as well as instances of following one-time-only reports:
and renovations must notify EPA in
advance of the initiation of any asbestos improperly contained waste. An owner notification of the date of construction
removal work. The notice provides or operator of an operation in which or reconstruction; notification of the
information on the dates of operation, asbestos-containing materials are spray- anticipated and actual dates of a startup;
the nature of the removal operation, the applied must notify EPA in advance of notification of any physical or
quantity of asbestos, and controls to be the spraying operation. operational change to an existing facility
used. The reviewing authority may then Any owner or operator subject to the which may increase the regulated
inspect the source to ensure compliance provisions of this part shall maintain a pollutant emission rate; notification of
with the standard. Demolitions and file of these measurements, and retain the date of the initial performance test;
renovations tend to be short-term the file for at least two years following and results of the initial performance
projects and it is difficult at best to the date of such measurements, and test. Owners or operators are also
determine compliance with the standard records. required to maintain records of the
once the project has been completed. Burden Statement: In the previously occurrence and duration of any startup,
Therefore, it is important that the approved ICR, the estimated number of shutdown, or malfunction in the
delegated authority be notified of the respondents for this information operation of an affected facility, or any
changes as necessary when information collection was 9,848 with 123,008 period during which the monitoring
in the original notification changes. responses per year. The annual industry system is inoperative. Records must be
Additionally, without notification of the reporting and recordkeeping burden for maintained if the VOC content of
changes, the Agency or delegated this collection of information was coatings is below the specified limits. If
authority may inspect a demolition or 342,249 hours. Each responded one or more coatings are used, the
renovation site where the project has provided 13 responses per year. The volume weighted average of the total
been delayed. The demolition and average recordkeeping and reporting mass of VOC per volume of coating
renovation standard requires that a burden for this ICR was 2.8 hours per solids must be recorded. When thermal
representative (such as a foreman or response. There were no capital/startup or catalytic incineration is performed,
management-level person) trained in the costs or operation and maintenance the owner shall keep records of each
provisions of the standard be present at costs associated with continuous three-hour period during which the
the facility. Evidence that the required emission monitoring in the previous incinerator temperature averaged more
training has been completed is required ICR. than 28 degrees Celsius below the
in order to ensure compliance with this (17) NSPS for Beverage Can Surface temperature of the most recent
provision of the standard. The standard Coating (40 CFR Part 60, Subpart WW); performance test at which destruction
requires asbestos removal contractors EPA ICR Number 0663.09; OMB Control efficiency was determined. The owners
that claim exemption from the wetting Number 2060–0001; expiration date or operators shall identify, record and
provisions because of freezing April 30, 2006. submit quarterly reports of each

VerDate jul<14>2003 18:03 May 05, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00069 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\06MYN1.SGM 06MYN1
24030 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 87 / Friday, May 6, 2005 / Notices

instance in which the volume-weighted were no capital/startup costs or device, the pressure loss of the gas
average of the total mass of VOC per operation and maintenance costs stream through the control equipment
volume of coating solids exceeded the associated with continuous emission and the scrubbing liquid pressure to the
standard. If there are no exceedances monitoring in the previous ICR. control equipment. Sources are also
reports shall be submitted (19) NSPS for Kraft Pulp Mills (40 required to record on a daily basis 12-
semiannually. Owners or operators are CFR Part 60, Subpart BB); EPA ICR hour average TRS concentrations and
required to maintain a file of all Number 1055.08; OMB Control Number oxygen concentrations (for the recovery
measurements including the monitoring 2060–0021; expiration date April 30, furnace and lime kiln) for two
device, and performance testing 2006. consecutive periods of each operating.
measurements; all monitoring device Affected Entities: Entities potentially Sources must report semiannually
calibration check adjustments and affected by this action are owners or measurements of excess emissions as
maintenance performed on these operators of kraft pulp mills. defined by the standard for the
systems recorded in a permanent file. Abstract: The New Source applicable affected facility.
Burden Statement: In the previously Performance Standards (NSPS) for Kraft Burden Statement: In the previously
approved ICR, the estimated number of Pulp Mills were promulgated on approved ICR, the estimated number of
respondents for this information February 23, 1978. respondents for this information
collection was 48 with 123 responses The affected entities are subject to the collection was 92 with 194 responses
per year. The annual industry reporting General Provisions of the New Source per year. The annual industry reporting
and recordkeeping burden for this Performance Standards (NSPS) at 40 and recordkeeping burden for this
collection of information was 4,642 CFR part 60, subpart A that apply to all collection of information was 12,107
hours. On average, each respondent NSPS sources. These requirements hours. On the average, each respondent
reported 2.6 times per year and 38 hours include recordkeeping and reporting for reported approximately 2.1 times per
were spent preparing each response. startup, shutdown, malfunctions, and year and 62 hours were spent preparing
The responses were prepared quarterly semiannual reporting. Exceptions to the each response. The responses were
and semiannually. The total annualized General Provisions for this source prepared semiannually. The total
cost was $97,000, which was comprised category are delineated in the standard annual reporting and recordkeeping cost
of capital/startup costs of $14,000 and and include initial notifications to the burden for this collection of information
operation and maintenance costs of Agency for new, reconstructed and was $3,144,000. This included an
$83,000. existing affected entities. annual cost of $300,000 associated with
(18) NSPS for Grain Elevators (40 CFR Respondents potentially affected by capital/startup costs and $2,844,000
Part 60, Subpart DD); EPA ICR Number this action are affected facilities at kraft associated with the annual operation
1130.08; OMB Control Number 2060– pulp mills including digester systems, and maintenance costs.
0082; expiration date April 30, 2006. brown stock washer systems, multiple (20) NSPS for Lime Manufacturing (40
Affected Entities: Entities potentially effect evaporator systems, recovery CFR Part 60, Subpart HH); EPA ICR
affected by this action are operations at furnaces, smelt dissolving tanks, lime Number 1167.08; OMB Control Number
grain elevators. kilns, and condensate stripper systems 2060–0063; expiration date April 30,
Abstract: The New Source that were constructed, modified or 2006.
Performance Standards (NSPS) for grain reconstructed after September 24, 1976. Affected Entities: Entities potentially
elevators were proposed on January 18, In pulp mills where kraft pulping is affected by this action are rotary lime
1977 and promulgated on August 3, combined with neutral sulfite semi- kiln used in lime manufacturing.
1978. The affected entities are subject to chemical pulping, the provisions of this Abstract: The New Source
the General Provision of the New Source subpart are applicable when any portion Performance Standards (NSPS) for the
Performance Standards (NSPS) at 40 of the material charged to an affected standards published at 40 CFR Part 60,
CFR part 60, subpart A and any changes, facility is produced by the kraft pulping Subpart HH were proposed on May 3,
or additions to the General Provisions operation. A facility may be exempt 1977, and promulgated on April 26,
specified at 40 CFR part 60, subpart DD. from the total reduced sulfur (TRS) 1984. The affected entities are subject to
Owners or operators of the facilities standard if the facility can demonstrate the General Provision of the New Source
must make one-time-only notifications. that TRS from a new, modified or Performance Standards (NSPS) at 40
Owners or operators are also required to reconstructed brown stock washer CFR part 60, subpart A and any changes,
maintain records of the occurrence and cannot be technically nor economically or additions to the General Provisions
duration of any startup, shutdown, or feasiblely controlled. specified at 40 CFR part 60, subpart HH.
malfunction in the operation of an In addition to the monitoring, The standards do not apply to facilities
affected facility, or any period during recordkeeping and reporting used in the manufacture of lime at kraft
which the monitoring system is requirements listed in the General pulp mills. NSPS standards require
inoperative. Monitoring requirements Provisions (40 CFR part 60, subpart A), initial notifications, performance tests,
specific to grain elevators provide sources are required to record, at least and periodic reports. Owners or
information on the operation of the once per shift, the following specific operators are also required to maintain
emissions control device and parameters: The opacity of the gases records of the occurrence and duration
compliance with the opacity standard. discharged into the atmosphere from of any startup, shutdown, or
Burden Statement: In the previously any recovery furnace; the concentration malfunction in the operation of an
approved ICR, the estimated number of of TRS emissions on a dry basis and the affected facility, or any period during
respondents for this information percent of oxygen by volume on a dry which the monitoring system is
collection was 132 with 155 responses basis in the gases discharged into the inoperative.
per year. The annual industry reporting atmosphere; for an incinerator, the Burden Statement: In the previously
and recordkeeping burden for this combustion temperature at the point of approved ICR, the estimated number of
collection of information was 259 hours. incineration of effluent gases being respondents for this information
On average, each respondent reported emitted by the affected facilities; and for collection was 55 with 106 responses
1.2 times per year and 1.7 hours were any lime kiln or melt discharge tank per year. The annual industry reporting
spent preparing each response. There using a scrubber emission control and recordkeeping burden for this

VerDate jul<14>2003 18:03 May 05, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00070 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\06MYN1.SGM 06MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 87 / Friday, May 6, 2005 / Notices 24031

collection of information was 4,434 nonmethane organic compounds coating facilities. Respondents shall
hours. On average, each respondent (NMOC)or operate as bioreactors. submit notifications and reports of
reported 1.9 times per year and 42 hours Abstract: The National Emission initial and repeat performance test
were spent preparing each response. Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants results. Facilities must develop and
The total annualized cost was $92,000, (NESHAP) for Municipal Solid Waste implement a startup, shutdown, and
which was comprised of capital/startup Landfills (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart malfunction plan and submit
costs of $15,000 and operation and AAAA) were proposed on November 7, semiannual reports of any event where
maintenance costs of $77,000. 2000, and promulgated on January 16, the plan was not followed. Facilities
(21) NSPS for Hot Mix Asphalt 2003. The affected entities are subject to must develop and implement an
Facilities (40 CFR Part 60, Subpart I); the General Provision of the National operations and maintenance plan and
EPA ICR Number 1127.08; OMB Control Emission Standards for Hazardous Air conduct and report the results of an
Number 2060–0083; expiration date Pollutants (NESHAP) at 40 CFR part 63, annual combustion system inspection.
April 31, 2006. subpart A and any changes, or additions Semiannual reports for periods of
Affected Entities: Entities potentially to the General Provisions specified at 40 operation during which the monitoring
affected by this standard are emission CFR part 63, subpart AAAA. Each parameters are exceeded or reports
sources at hot mix asphalt facilities. owner or operator of an MSW landfill certifying that no exceedances have
Abstract: The New Source affected by the standard is required to occurred also are required.
Performance Standards (NSPS) for Hot submit semiannual compliance reports General requirements applicable to all
Mix Asphalt Facilities were proposed for control device operating parameters. NESHAP require records of applicability
on June 11, 1973, and promulgated on Owners and operators of affected determinations; test results;
July 25, 1977. facilities also have to prepare a startup, exceedances; periods of startups,
The affected entities are subject to the shutdown, and malfunction plan. shutdowns, or malfunctions; monitoring
Burden Statement: In the previously records; and all other information
General Provision of the New Source
approved ICR, the estimated number of needed to determine compliance with
Performance Standards (NSPS) at 40
respondents for this information the applicable standard.
CFR part 60, subpart A and any changes,
collection was 1,330 with 1,330
or additions to the General Provisions Subpart WWWW requires
responses per year. The annual industry
specified at 40 CFR part 60, subpart I. respondents to maintain records of all
reporting and recordkeeping burden for
NSPS standards require sources to coatings, thinners, and cleaning
this collection of information was
submit initial notifications, conduct materials data and calculations used to
39,360 hours. On average, each
performance tests, and submit periodic determine compliance. This information
respondent reported 1.0 times per year
reports. Owners or operators are also includes the volume used during each
and 30 hours were spent preparing each
required to maintain records of the compliance period, mass fraction of
response. The total annualized cost was
occurrence and duration of any startup, organic HAP, density, and, for coatings
$13,000, which was comprised of no
shutdown, or malfunction in the only, volume fraction of coating solids.
capital/startup costs and operation and
operation of an affected facility, or any If an add-on control device is used,
maintenance costs of $13,000.
period during which the monitoring (23) NESHAP for the Wood Building records will need to be kept of the
system is inoperative. Monitoring Products Surface Coating Industry (40 capture efficiency of the capture device,
requirements specific to hot mix asphalt CFR Part 63, Subpart WWWW); Docket destruction or removal efficiency of the
facilities include particulate matter and ID Number OECA–2005–0043; EPA ICR control device, and the monitored
opacity monitoring. Semiannual reports Number 2034.03; OMB Control Number operating parameters. In addition,
of excess emissions are required. These 2060–0510; expiration date May 31, records need to be kept of emission
notifications, reports, and records are 2006. calculations, calculations, test results,
essential in determining compliance. Affected Entities: Entities potentially and other supporting information.
Burden Statement: In the previously affected by this action are owners and Burden Statement: In the previously
approved ICR, the estimated number of operators of wood building products approved ICR, the estimated number of
respondents for this information surface coating facilities. respondents for this information
collection was 2,835 with 3,403 Abstract: The National Emission collection was 215 with 430 responses
responses per year. The annual industry Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants per year. The annual industry reporting
reporting and recordkeeping burden for (NESHAP) for the wood building and recordkeeping burden for this
this collection of information was products surface coating industry were collection of information was 2,176
10,303 hours. On average, each promulgated on May 28, 2003. hours. On average, each respondent
respondent reported 1.20 per year and The affected entities are subject to the reported 2.0 times per year and 5 hours
spent three hours preparing each General Provisions of the National were spent preparing each response.
response. There were no capital/startup Emission Standards for Hazardous Air The responses were prepared
costs or operation and maintenance Pollutants (NESHAP) at 40 CFR part 63, semiannually. The total annualized cost
costs in the previous ICR. subpart A that apply to all NESHAP was $22,000 which was comprised of
(22) NESHAP for Municipal Solid sources. These requirements include capital/startup costs of $22,000 and no
Waste Landfills (40 CFR Part 63, recordkeeping and reporting for startup, operation and maintenance costs.
Subpart AAAA); EPA ICR Number shutdown, malfunctions, and (24) NESHAP for Reinforced Plastics
1938.03; OMB Control Number 2060– semiannual reporting. Exceptions to the Composites Production (40 CFR Part 63,
0505; expiration date April 30, 2006. General Provisions for this source Subpart WWWW); EPA ICR Number
Affected Entities: Entities potentially category are delineated in the standard 1976.03; OMB Control Number 2060–
affected by this action are municipal and include initial notifications to the 0509; expiration date May 31, 2006.
solid waste landfills (MSW) that: (1) Agency for new, reconstructed and Affected Entities: The entities affected
Have a design capacity of 2.5 million existing affected entities, and by this action are fugitive emission
megagrams (Mg) and 2.5 million cubic notifications of compliance status. sources at reinforced plastic composites
meters (m3), and (2) emit equal to or Respondents are owners or operators (RPC) production facilities using resins,
greater than 50 tons per year of of wood building products surface gel coats, and cleaning solvents.

VerDate jul<14>2003 18:03 May 05, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00071 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\06MYN1.SGM 06MYN1
24032 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 87 / Friday, May 6, 2005 / Notices

Abstract: The National Emission standard requires that the respondents operations and maintenance plan and
Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants source submit applications for approval conduct and report the results of an
(NESHAP) for reinforced plastic of construction or reconstruction. The annual combustion system inspection.
composites (RPC) production operations information in the initial notification Semiannual reports for periods of
and processes, published at 40 CFR part and the application for construction or operation during which the monitoring
63, subpart WWWW, were proposed on reconstruction. Respondents are also parameters are exceeded (or reports
August 2, 2001 (66 FR 40323), and required to submit one-time reports of certifying that no exceedances have
promulgated on April 21, 2003 (68 FR (1) start of construction for new occurred) also are required.
19375). facilities and (2) anticipated and actual General requirements applicable to all
Owners and operators of affected start-up dates for new facilities. Subpart NESHAP require records of applicability
sources are subject to the monitoring, VVV also requires affected sources to determinations; test results;
recordkeeping and reporting submit a notification of compliance exceedances; periods of startups,
requirements of 40 CFR part 63, subpart status. This notification must be signed shutdowns, or malfunctions; monitoring
A, the General Provisions, unless by a responsible company official who records; and all other information
specified otherwise in subpart WWWW. certifies its accuracy and certifies that needed to determine compliance with
This standard requires sources to submit the source has complied with the the applicable standard.
initial notifications, conduct standards. Subpart RRRR requires respondents to
performance tests, and submit periodic Burden Statement: In the previously maintain records of all coatings,
reports. In addition, sources are approved ICR, the estimated number of thinners, and cleaning materials data
required to maintain records of the respondents for this information and calculations used to determine
occurrence and duration of any startup, collection were six with six responses compliance. This information includes
shutdown, or malfunction in the per year. The annual industry reporting the volume used during each monthly
operation of an affected facility; any and recordkeeping burden for this compliance period, mass fraction
period during which the monitoring collection of information was 216 hours. organic HAP, density, and, for coatings
system is inoperative; bag leak detection On average, each respondent reported only, volume fraction solids. If an add-
system alarms, including corrective 1.0 times per year and 36 hours were on control device is used, records must
actions; parametric monitoring data; spent preparing each response. There be kept of the capture efficiency of the
system maintenance and calibration; were no capital/startup costs or capture system, destruction or removal
and opacity and visible emissions operation and maintenance costs efficiency of the add-on control device,
observations to demonstrate initial and associated wit this ICR. and the monitored operating
ongoing compliance with the standard. (26) NESHAP for Metal Furniture parameters. In addition, records must be
Records of such measurements and Surface Coating (40 CFR Part 63, kept of each emission calculation for
actions are to be retained two years on- Subpart RRRR); EPA ICR Number each monthly compliance period and all
site of the required total five years. 1952.03; OMB Control Number 2060– data, calculations, test results, and other
Burden Statement: In the previously 0518; expiration date May 31, 2006. supporting information.
approved ICR, the estimated number of Affected Entities: Entities potentially Burden Statement: In the previously
respondents for this information affected by this action are owners and approved ICR, the estimated number of
collection was 469 with 548 responses operators of metal furniture surface respondents for this information
per year. The annual industry reporting coating facilities. collection was 576 with 576 responses
and recordkeeping burden for this Abstract: The National Emission per year. The annual industry reporting
collection of information was 13,785 Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants and recordkeeping burden for this
hours. On average, each respondent (NESHAP) for Metal Furniture Surface collection of information was 45,672
reported 1.2 times per year and spent 25 Coating were promulgated on May hours. On average, each respondent
hours preparing each response. 23,2003. reported 1.0 times per year and 79 hours
The total annualized cost for The affected entities are subject to the were spent preparing each response.
continuous emissions monitoring was General Provisions of the National The responses were prepared
$15,807 which was comprised of no Emission Standards for Hazardous Air semiannually. There were no capital/
capital/startup costs and operation and Pollutants (NESHAP) at 40 CFR part 63, startup costs or operation and
maintenance costs of $15,807. subpart A that apply to all NESHAP maintenance costs associated with
(25) NESHAP for Publicly Owned sources. These requirements include continuous emission monitoring in the
Treatment Works (40 CFR Part 63, recordkeeping and reporting for startup, previous ICR.
Subpart VVV), EPA ICR Number shutdown, malfunctions, and (27) NESHAP for Asphalt Processing
1891.04, OMB Control Number 2060– semiannual reporting. Exceptions to the and Asphalt Roofing Manufacturing (40
0428, expiration date May 31, 2006. General Provisions for this source CFR Part 63, Subpart LLLLL); EPA ICR
Affected Entities: Entities potentially category are delineated in the standard Number 2029.03; OMB Control Number
affected by this action are publically and include initial notifications to the 2060–0520; expiration date May 31,
owned treatment works (POTW) located Agency for new, reconstructed and 2006.
at a major source of hazardous air existing affected entities, and Affected Entities: Entities potentially
pollutant (HAP) emissions. notifications of compliance status. affected by this action are asphalt
Abstract: The National Emissions Respondents are owners or operators processing and asphalt roofing
Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants of metal furniture surface coating manufacturing facilities.
(NESHAP) for Publically Owned facilities. Respondents shall submit Abstract: Owners and operators of
Treatment Works (40 CFR Part 63, notifications and reports of performance affected sources are subject to the
Subpart VVV) were promulgated on test results. Facilities must develop and monitoring, recordkeeping and
October 26, 1999. Owners and operators implement a startup, shutdown, and reporting requirements of 40 CFR part
of affected sources are subject to the malfunction plan and submit 63, subpart A, the General Provisions,
requirements of 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart semiannual reports of any event where unless specified otherwise in subpart
A, the General Provisions, unless the plan was not followed. Facilities LLLLL. This standard requires sources
specified otherwise at subpart VVV. The must develop and implement an to submit initial notifications, conduct

VerDate jul<14>2003 18:03 May 05, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00072 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\06MYN1.SGM 06MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 87 / Friday, May 6, 2005 / Notices 24033

performance tests, and submit periodic Burden Statement: In the previously Affected Entities: Entities potentially
reports. In addition, sources are approved ICR, the estimated number of affected by this standard are coke oven
required to maintain records of the respondents for this information batteries.
occurrence and duration of any startup, collection was nine with 15 responses Abstract: The National Emission
shutdown, or malfunction in the per year. The annual industry reporting Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants
operation of an affected facility; any and recordkeeping burden for this (NESHAP) for Coke Ovens: Pushing,
period during which the monitoring collection of information was 1,211 Quenching, and Battery Stacks,
system is inoperative; bag leak detection hours. On average, each respondent published at 40 CFR part 63, subpart
system alarms, including corrective reported 1.7 times per year and 81 hours CCCCC, were proposed on July 3, 2001
actions; parametric monitoring data; were spent preparing each response. (66 FR 35325), and promulgated on
system maintenance and calibration; The total annualized cost was $3,000, April 14, 2003 (68 FR 18007).
and opacity and visible emissions which was comprised of capital/startup Subsequently, the standard has been
observations to demonstrate initial and costs of $1,000 and operation and revised on several occasions (i.e.,
ongoing compliance with the standard. maintenance costs of $2,000. through corrections and direct final
Burden Statement: In the previously (29) NESHAP for Paper and Other standard amendments) including April
approved ICR, the estimated number of Web Coating (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart 22, 2003 (68 FR 19885), October 13,
respondents for this information JJJJ); EPA ICR Number 1951.03; OMB 2004 (69 FR 60813 and 69 FR 60837),
collection was 22 with 32 responses per Control Number 2060–0511; expiration and January 10, 2005 (70 FR 1670).
year. The annual industry reporting and date May 31, 2006. Owners and operators of affected
recordkeeping burden for this collection Affected Entities: Entities potentially sources are subject to the monitoring,
of information was 1,962 hours. On affected by this action are paper and recordkeeping and reporting
average, each respondent reported 1.5 other web coating operations. requirements of 40 CFR part 63, subpart
times per year and 61 hours were spent A, the General Provisions, unless as
Abstract: The National Emission
preparing each response. specified otherwise in 40 CFR part 63,
Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants
The total annualized cost was subpart CCCCC. This standard requires
(NESHAP) for Paper and Other Web
$277,689, which was comprised of no the respondents to submit initial
Coating (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart JJJJ)
capital/startup costs and operation and notifications, conduct performance
were proposed on September 13, 2000,
maintenance costs of $277,689. tests, and submit periodic reports. In
(28) NESHAP for Flexible and promulgated on December 4, 2002.
addition, sources are required to
Polyurethane Foam Fabrication (40 CFR The affected entities are subject to the
maintain records of the occurrence and
part 63, subpart MMMMM); EPA ICR General Provision of the National
duration of any startup, shutdown, or
Number 2027.03; OMB Control Number Emission Standards for Hazardous Air
malfunction in the operation of an
2060–0516; expiration date May 31, Pollutants (NESHAP) at 40 CFR part 61,
affected facility; any period during
2006. subpart A and any changes, or additions
which the monitoring system is
Affected Entities: Entities potentially to the General Provisions specified at 40
inoperative; bag leak detection system
affected by this action are flexible CFR part 63, subpart JJJJ.
alarms, including corrective actions;
polyurethane foam fabrication This standard requires sources to
parametric monitoring data; system
operations. submit initial notifications, conduct
maintenance and calibration; and
Abstract: The National Emission performance tests, and submit periodic
opacity and visible emissions
Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants reports. In addition, sources are
observations to demonstrate initial and
(NESHAP) for Flexible Polyurethane required to maintain records of the
ongoing compliance with the standard.
Foam Fabrication (40 CFR part 63, occurrence and duration of any startup, Burden Statement: In the previously
subpart MMMMM) were proposed on shutdown, or malfunction in the approved ICR, the estimated number of
August 8, 2001, and promulgated on operation of an affected facility; any respondents for this information
April 14, 2003. The affected entities are period during which the monitoring collection was six with 30 responses per
subject to the General Provision of the system is inoperative and to year. The annual industry reporting and
National Emission Standards for demonstrate initial and ongoing recordkeeping burden for this collection
Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) at compliance with the standard. of information was 2,209 hours. On
40 CFR part 63, subpart A and any Burden Statement: In the previously average, each respondent reported 5.0
changes, or additions to the General approved ICR, the estimated number of times per year and spent 74 hours
Provisions specified at 40 CFR part 63, respondents for this information preparing each response.
subpart MMMMM. For the purposes of collection was 441 with 1,477 responses The total annualized cost was
this standard, flexible polyurethane per year. The annual industry reporting $83,000, which was comprised of
foam fabrication is divided into two and recordkeeping burden for this capital/startup costs of $32,000 and
subcategories: (1) Loop slitter adhesive collection of information was 41,462 operation and maintenance costs of
use and (2) flame lamination. For hours. On average, each respondent $51,000.
existing flame lamination facilities, reported 3.3 times per year and 28 hours (31) NESHAP for Printing, Coating
there are no emission limits or were spent preparing each response. and Dyeing of Fabrics and Other
monitoring, inspection, reporting, and The total annualized cost was Textiles (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart
recordkeeping (MIRR) requirements $2,928,000 which was comprised of OOOO); EPA ICR Number 2071.03;
except for submission of an initial capital/startup costs of $2,249,000 and OMB Control Number 2060–0522;
notification. Therefore, each existing operation and maintenance costs of expiration date May 31, 2006.
flame lamination facilities submits an $679,000. Affected Entities: Entities potentially
initial notification and does not perform (30) NESHAP for Coke Oven Pushing, affected by this action are fabric and
any other MIRR activities. Flame Quenching and Battery Stacks (40 CFR other textiles printing, coating and
lamination facilities perform all the Part 63, Subpart CCCCC); EPA ICR dyeing operations.
activities necessary to comply with the Number 1995.03; OMB Control Number Abstract: The National Emission
emission limit and MIRR requirements 2060–0521; expiration date May 31, Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants
for new flame lamination sources. 2006. (NESHAP) for Printing, Coating and

VerDate jul<14>2003 18:03 May 05, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00073 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\06MYN1.SGM 06MYN1
24034 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 87 / Friday, May 6, 2005 / Notices

Dyeing of Fabrics and other Textiles (40 any event where the plans were not year. The annual industry reporting and
CFR Part 63, Subpart OOOO) were followed. recordkeeping burden for this collection
proposed on July 11, 2002, promulgated Burden Statement: In the previously of information was 17,471 hours. On
on May 29, 2003 and amended on approved ICR, the estimated number of average, each respondent reported 1.0
August 4, 2004. The affected entities are respondents for this information times per year and 236 hours were spent
subject to the General Provision of the collection was eight with 24 responses preparing each response. The total
National Emission Standards for per year. The annual industry reporting annualized cost was $120,000 which
Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) at and recordkeeping burden for this was comprised of capital/startup costs
40 CFR part 63, subpart A and any collection of information was 726 hours. of $115,000 and operation and
changes, or additions to the General On average, each respondent reported maintenance costs of $5,000.
Provisions specified at 40 CFR part 63, 3.0 times per year and 30 hours were (34) NESHAP for Benzene Waste
subpart OOOO. spent preparing each response. The total Operations (40 CFR Part 61, Subpart
This standard requires sources to annualized cost was $46,000 which was FF); EPA ICR Number 1541.08; OMB
submit initial notifications, conduct comprised of capital/startup costs of Control Number 2060–0183; expiration
performance tests, and submit periodic $45,000 and operation and maintenance date May 31, 2006.
reports. In addition, sources are costs of $1,000. Affected Entities: Entities potentially
required to maintain records of the (33) NESHAP for Brick and Structural affected by this action are owners and
occurrence and duration of any startup, Clay Manufacturing (40 CFR Part 63, operators of chemical manufacturing
shutdown, or malfunction in the Subpart JJJJJ); EPA ICR Number 2022.03; plants, coke by-product recovery plants,
operation of an affected facility; any OMB Control Number 2060–0508; and petroleum refineries, as well as
period during which the monitoring expiration date May 31, 2006. owners and operators of hazardous
Affected Entities: Entities potentially waste treatment, storage and disposal
system is inoperative and to
affected by this action are brick and facilities that treat, store, or dispose of
demonstrate initial and ongoing
structural clay manufacturing facilities. hazardous waste.
compliance with the standard. Abstract: The National Emission Abstract: The National Emission
Burden Statement: In the previously Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants
approved ICR, the estimated number of (NESHAP) for Brick and Structural Clay (NESHAP) for Benzene Waste
respondents for this information Manufacturing (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart Operations (40 CFR part 61, subpart FF)
collection was 138 with 222 responses JJJJJ) were proposed on July 22, 2002, were promulgated on March 7, 1990.
per year. The annual industry reporting promulgated on May 16, 2003. The The affected entities are subject to the
and recordkeeping burden for this affected entities are subject to the General Provisions specified at 40 CFR
collection of information was 29,491 General Provision of the National part 61, subpart A and any changes, or
hours. On average, each respondent Emission Standards for Hazardous Air additions to the General Provisions
reported 1.6 times per year and 133 Pollutants (NESHAP) at 40 CFR part 63, specified at 40 CFR part 61, subpart FF.
hours were spent preparing each subpart A and any changes, or additions Owners or operators of the affected
response. The total annualized cost was to the General Provisions specified at 40 facilities described must make one-time-
$141,000 which was comprised of CFR part 63, subpart JJJJJ. The standard only notifications. Owners or operators
capital/startup costs of $136,000 and applies to existing large tunnel kilns. are also required to maintain records of
operation and maintenance costs of The standard also applies to all new or the occurrence and duration of any
$5,000. reconstructed tunnel kilns regardless of startup, shutdown, or malfunction in
(32) NESHAP for Refractory Products size. However, the emission limits in the operation of an affected facility, or
Manufacturing (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart the standard are different for new small any period during which the monitoring
SSSSS); EPA ICR Number 2040.03; and new large tunnel kilns. Small system is inoperative. Monitoring
OMB Control Number 2060–0515; tunnel kilns have design capacities of requirements specific to Benzene Waste
expiration date May 31, 2006. less than 10 tons per hour of fired Operations provide information on the
Affected Entities: Entities potentially product, while large tunnel kilns have operation of the vapor control device
affected by this action are refractory design capacities greater than or equal and compliance with the standard.
products manufacturing facilities. to 10 tons per hour of fired product. Quarterly reports of excess emissions
Abstract: The National Emission Respondents must submit one-time are required.
Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants notifications of applicability and reports For this standard, there is a tiered
(NESHAP) for Refractory Products on initial performance test results. threshold for burden. Facilities
Manufacturing (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart Plants must develop and implement a managing waste containing less than 1
SSSSS) were proposed on June 20, 2002, startup, shutdown, and malfunction megagram of benzene must simply
promulgated on April 16, 2003. The plan and submit semiannual reports of certify to that affect and maintain
affected entities are subject to the any event where the plan was not documentation to support their finding.
General Provision of the National followed. Respondents must also Facilities managing more than 1
Emission Standards for Hazardous Air develop and implement an operation, megagram and less than 10 megagrams
Pollutants (NESHAP) at 40 CFR part 63, maintenance, and monitoring plan of benzene-containing waste must
subpart A and any changes, or additions covering each affected source and each prepare an initial certification, test
to the General Provisions specified at 40 emission control device used for annually to verify that their waste
CFR part 63, subpart SSSSS. compliance with the standard. stream still falls within this range and
Respondents must submit one-time Semiannual reports for periods of maintain documentation to support
notifications of applicability and reports emission limitation deviations (or these findings. Finally, facilities
on initial performance test results. reports certifying that no deviations managing more than 10 megagrams of
Plants must develop and implement a have occurred) also are required. waste must submit quarterly and annual
startup, shutdown, and malfunction Burden Statement: In the previously reports documenting the results of
plan; develop and implement an approved ICR, the estimated number of continuous monitoring.
operation, maintenance, and monitoring respondents for this information Burden Statement: In the previously
plan; and submit semiannual reports of collection was 77 with 74 responses per approved ICR, the estimated number of

VerDate jul<14>2003 18:03 May 05, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00074 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\06MYN1.SGM 06MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 87 / Friday, May 6, 2005 / Notices 24035

respondents for this information exceedances; periods of startups, requirements. Notification reports are
collection was 240 with 240 responses shutdowns, or malfunctions; monitoring required related to the construction,
per year with a total burden of 16,626 records; and all other information reconstruction, or modification of an
hours. Each respondent report 1.0 times needed to determine compliance with HMIWI. Also required are one-time-only
per year. The average recordkeeping and the applicable standard. reports related to initial performance
reporting burden for this ICR was 71 Subpart NNNN requires respondents test data and continuous measurements
hours per response. There were no to maintain records of all coatings, of site-specific operating parameters.
capital/startup costs or operation and thinners, and cleaning materials data Annual compliance reports are required
maintenance costs associated with and calculations used to determine
related to a variety of site-specific
continuous emission monitoring in the compliance. This information includes
operating parameters, including
previous ICR. the volume used during each monthly
(35) NESHAP for the Surface Coating compliance period, mass fraction exceedances of applicable limits.
of Large Household and Commercial organic HAP, density, and, for coatings Semiannual compliance reports are
Appliances (40 CFR part 63, subpart only, volume fraction of coating solids. required related to emission rate or
NNNN); Leonard Lazarus of the Office If an add-on control device is used, operating parameter data that were not
of Compliance at (202) 564–6369 or via records must be kept of the capture obtained when exceedances of
E-mail to: lazarus.leonard@epa.gov; EPA efficiency of the capture system, applicable limits occurred.
ICR Number 1954.03; OMB Control destruction or removal efficiency of the Co-fired combustors and incinerators
Number 2060–0457; expiration date add-on control device, and the burning only pathological, low-level
May 31, 2006. monitored operating parameters. In radioactive, and/or chemotherapeutic
Affected Entities: Entities potentially addition, records must be kept of each waste are required to submit notification
affected by this action are owners and emission calculation for each monthly reports of an exemption claim, and an
operators of large household and compliance period and all data, estimate of the relative amounts of
commercial appliance surface coating calculations, test results, and other
waste and fuels to be combusted. Co-
facilities. supporting information.
Abstract: The National Emission Burden Statement: In the previously fired combustors and incinerators are
Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants approved ICR, the estimated number of also required to maintain records on a
(NESHAP) for the Surface Coating of respondents for this information calendar quarter basis of the weight of
Large Household and Commercial collection was 82 with 16 responses per hospital waste combusted, the weight of
Appliances were promulgated on July year. The annual industry reporting and medical/infectious waste combusted,
23, 2002. recordkeeping burden for this collection and the weight of all other fuels
The affected entities are subject to the of information was 7,737 hours. On combusted at the co-fired combustor.
General Provisions of the National average, each respondent reported 0.2 Incinerators burning only pathological,
Emission Standards for Hazardous Air times per year and 484 hours were spent low-level radioactive, and/or
Pollutants (NESHAP) at 40 CFR part 63, preparing each response. The responses chemotherapeutic waste are also
subpart A that apply to all NESHAP were prepared semiannually. The total required to maintain records of the
sources. These requirements include annualized cost was $3,000, which was periods of time when only pathological
recordkeeping and reporting for startup, comprised of capital/startup costs of $0 waste, low-level radioactive waste, and/
shutdown, malfunctions, and and operation and maintenance costs of or chemotherapeutic waste is burned.
semiannual reporting. Exceptions to the $3,000.
General Provisions for this source (36) State and Federal Emission Burden Statement: In the previously
category are delineated in the standard Guidelines for Hospital/Medical/ approved ICR, the estimated number of
and include initial notifications to the Infectious Waste Incinerators (40 CFR respondents for this information
Agency for new, reconstructed and Part 60, Subpart Ce and 40 CFR Part 62, collection were 189 with 645 responses
existing affected entities, and Subpart HHH), EPA ICR Number per year. The annual industry reporting
notifications of compliance status. 1899.03, OMB Control Number 2060– and recordkeeping burden for this
Respondents are owners or operators 0422, expiration date May 31, 2006. collection of information was 105,228
of large household and commercial Affected Entities: Entities potentially hours. On average, each respondent
appliance surface coating facilities. affected by this action are hospital/ reported 3.4 times per year and 163
Respondents shall submit notifications medical/infectious waste incinerators hours were spent preparing each
(where applicable) and reports of initial (HMIWI). response. There were no capital/startup
and repeat performance test results. Abstract: State and Federal Emission costs associated with continuous
Facilities must develop and implement Guidelines for Hospital/Medical/ emission monitoring in the previous
a startup, shutdown, and malfunction Infectious Waste Incinerators were ICR. However, the operation and
plan and submit semiannual reports of promulgated on September 15, 1997 (40 maintenance costs associated with
any event where the plan was not CFR part 60, subpart Ce) and August 15, continuous emission monitoring in the
followed. Facilities must develop and 2000 (40 CFR part 60, subpart HHH).
previous ICR were estimated to be
implement an operations and Owners and operators of affected
$295,407.
maintenance plan and conduct and sources are subject to the requirements
report the results of an annual of 40 CFR part 60, subpart A, the Dated: April 21, 2005.
combustion system inspection. General Provisions, or 40 CFR part 62, Michael M. Stahl,
Semiannual reports for periods of subpart A unless specified otherwise at Director, Office of Compliance.
operation during which the monitoring 40 CFR part 60, subpart Ce or 40 CFR [FR Doc. 05–9082 Filed 5–5–05; 8:45 am]
parameters are exceeded (or reports part 62, subpart HHH. HMIWIs for
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
certifying that no exceedances have which construction was commenced on
occurred) also are required. or before June 20, 1996, and burning
General requirements applicable to all hospital waste and/or medical
NESHAP require records of applicability infectious waste are subject to specific
determinations; test results; reporting and recording keeping

VerDate jul<14>2003 18:03 May 05, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00075 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\06MYN1.SGM 06MYN1

Вам также может понравиться