Dharma Wheel - View Topic - Are Karma and Rebirth Real - 2

14/10/2558
DharmaWheelViewtopicAreKarmaandRebirthReal?
ABuddhistdiscussionforumonMahayanaandVajrayanaBuddhism
Search
Search
Advancedsearch
Are Karma and Rebirth Real?

Forumrules
Postareply
Searchthistopic
Search
773postsPage2of391,2,3,4,5...39
Reportthispost(./report.php?f=66&p=62341)
Replywithquote(./posting.php?mode=quote&f=66&p=62341)
Re: are karma and rebirth for real? (#p62341)

byLastLegendSatOct22,20119:53pm
Karma is real. Actions will create effects. If you grow apple, you will have apple.
And hell is your own experience of your mind...if you constantly think negative, that's hell for
you right there.
Rebirth...well things grow, and die, and grow again. It is a cycle man and we need to break
out of this cycle. I am sure you can see this in nature as well...if there is birth, there is death.
If there is death, there is birth.
Peace outside hippies
Top

bycoldmountainSatOct22,201111:36pm
Thanks for your response Dechen Norbu,
So, there you have it. IMO, the only way out in the current state of affairs is for
you to try it for yourself. It will be a hell of a quest as it seems training your
mind to such a point takes years of dedicated practice, thousands or tens of
thousands hours of meditation and perhaps some more hundreds of hours
studying. In the end you will know, but it's a knowledge obtained in a way that
can't be proven to a 3rd person. Gladly, knowing for a fact that rebirth is true
or not seems to bring many other positive side effects to our mind.
worth your while.
So it may
I suppose the problem I have with this is that it rests on the testimony of a few people. The
claims of Buddhism about heavens, hells and all the rest seem to hinge on scant evidence.
Ultimately, it seems little different than belief in God, those who say you have to believe
first, then see. But how can one believe without seeing? This of course is not a perfect
analogy, but it comes close. How can I have the confidence to practice when one of the most
basic claims of Buddhism seems fantastic? The idea of knowing 'in the end' seems like the
Christian's assurance that we'll know in the afterlife. And if it really takes tens of thousands
of hours of training the mind just to verify what, to my mind, should be a relatively readily
http://dharmawheel.net/viewtopic.php?f=66&t=5678&start=20
1/16
14/10/2558
accessible phenomenon, for me that might as well be at some point in the afterlife. In this
way it seems to vary little from God. The biggest claim of theism is also the most vacant in
terms of empirical verification.
I really do hear you on the philosophy of mind. I can no longer accept materialistic
metaphysics, but giving up on materialism, while opening me up to the possibility of rebirth,
has not given me any positive reason to believe in it.
Thanks and peace,
Mike
Top

byKeithBCSatOct22,201111:58pm
coldmountain wrote:
Ultimately, it seems little different than belief in God, those who say you have
to believe first, then see.
I beg to differ. It is quite different.

Buddhism does not ask you to believe first then see. It asks you to keep an open mind, not
rejecting its teachings while you check things out for yourself. If you pay attention, you will
see that suffering is caused by attachment. If you pay attention, you can verify that following
the Eightfld Path is a more wholesome way to live. If you pay attention, you can verify karma
for yourself. If you pay attention, you can even get hints of previous lives.
Then, as you build up experience in verifying the Buddha's claims as being true, you will
realize the quality of teacher that he was. You will have confidence that, when the Buddha
makes a particular claim, it is very likely true even if you have no firsthand experience,
because the teachings you already checked out turned out to be true.
Buddhism asks you to see for yourself, and then believe.
Om mani padme hum
Keith
Top

byTilopaSunOct23,201112:17am
KeithBC wrote:
coldmountain wrote:
Ultimately, it seems little different than belief in God, those who say
you have to believe first, then see.
2/16
14/10/2558
Buddhism asks you to see for yourself, and then believe.
True but some of the fundamentals such as karma and rebirth are hidden or very hidden
phenomena and can't be 'seen' but only inferred through logic or accepted on the basis of
one's belief that Buddha is omniscient and his teachings correct. Like other religious
traditions at a certain point faith also becomes an essential aspect of practice.
Top

byKeithBCSunOct23,20111:39am
Tilopa wrote:
True but some of the fundamentals such as karma and rebirth are hidden or
very hidden phenomena and can't be 'seen' but only inferred through logic or
accepted on the basis of one's belief that Buddha is omniscient and his
teachings correct. Like other religious traditions at a certain point faith also
becomes an essential aspect of practice.
Rebirth, yes, can only be inferred.

But it is possible to observe karma directly. True, you can't see it carrying over from one
lifetime to the next, but you can see it in operation during this life.
Om mani padme hum
Keith
Top

byDarwidHalimSunOct23,20112:07am
coldmountain wrote:
Cause and effect does not mean rebirth, for it is just as easy to affirm cause
and effect without rebirth. Rebirth requires cause and effect, but not the other
way around.
In order to understand whether god exists or not, we need to understand emptiness

perfectly. We will start with intellectual level followed by direct experience. That is the
normal way. It will be very long to explain it in this forum.
However, your comment which I quoted above is quite interesting.
3/16
14/10/2558
Cause and effect does not required rebirth. This is true. The problem is normal people
cannot stop the cause. They always create the cause unconsciously. In this case, they have
themselves choose to be born again and again.
The teaching of 6 bardo well explain that when we are going to die, we will be very scared.
Because of that during the bardo state, we will 'grab' something, where that something is
related to our karma. In this case, we are choosing the cause again and again and again. No
choice then for us to take rebirth. The rebirth cannot be stopped.
In order for you to accept karma is quite easy, just do simple experiment you will get it.
In order to accept rebirth, we need intellectual understanding in case we never see Our past
lifes, which will be quite long to be explained here.
I think this book can help you: "Natural liberation" by Padmashbava and others. Another book
is "Mind Beyond Death"
Top

bydeepbluehumSunOct23,20112:09am
KeithBC wrote:
Rebirth, yes, can only be inferred.
Arhats and up directly perceive all their past lives. Tathagatas see everyone's past and future
lives. Drubwang Rinpoche, as fairly recent example, recalled his past lives and recounted one
where he committed a murder.
Top

bydakini_boiSunOct23,20112:21am
coldmountain wrote:
The claims of Buddhism about heavens, hells and all the rest seem to hinge on
scant evidence. Ultimately, it seems little different than belief in God, those
who say you have to believe first, then see. But how can one believe without
seeing? This of course is not a perfect analogy, but it comes close. How can I
have the confidence to practice when one of the most basic claims of Buddhism
seems fantastic? The idea of knowing 'in the end' seems like the Christian's
assurance that we'll know in the afterlife. And if it really takes tens of
thousands of hours of training the mind just to verify what, to my mind, should
be a relatively readily accessible phenomenon, for me that might as well be at
some point in the afterlife. In this way it seems to vary little from God. The
biggest claim of theism is also the most vacant in terms of empirical
verification. . .
4/16
14/10/2558
Mike,
Buddhist teachings on heavens & hells can be empirically observed. They are metaphors for
possible conditions that beings live in. They are presented as if they are separate "realms"
but they are really temporary states that beings find themselves based on various causes. I
can certainly observe, in my own life, transmigration among the six realms.
Probably the best place to start studying Buddhism if you are really geared toward
empiricism, is with the 4 noble truths. It took me years of honestly observing myself, before I
was able to accept the 1st and 2nd noble truths. (on suffering and its causes). At this point,
the only thing I really take on faith in Buddhism is that liberation is possible. The reason I
accept this on faith is that great teachers who have demonstrated to me that their
perception surpasses my own have said this.
The only reason belief in rebirth is necessary to practice Buddhism is because if your chain
of causes and effects ends with your death, what could possibly motivate you to invest the
time and effort to attain conditionless happiness? It would seem to be much easier to focus
on the 8 worldly dharmas. . .
Top

byThug4lyfeSunOct23,20118:02am
Not believing in rebirth will hinder your cultivation. Your more likely to commit alot of wrong
doing and regress in your progress, because temptations are too strong to with standing
without a more solid faith on consequences from bad karma.
Top

byedearlSunOct23,20118:19am
Food_Eatah wrote:
Not believing in rebirth will hinder your cultivation. Your more likely to commit
alot of wrong doing and regress in your progress, because temptations are too
strong to with standing without a more solid faith on consequences from bad
karma.
I guess I don't understand. If you have infinite chances to do right and have good karma, it
seems to me one would be more likely to be bad in this life, and putoff working to be good. If
you only have one chance, you better be good the first time. N'estce pas?
Top
Re: are karma and rebirth for real?
5/16
14/10/2558

byKyosanSunOct23,20118:24am
deepbluehum wrote:
Actions have consequences, that's just common sense. Western religions believe
in rebirth in hell or heaven. Islam believes you are reborn from hell to heaven
when the punishment is complete. The best explanation comes from Western
metaphysics, every moment the body changes. It is discontinuous. In Buddhist
terms, every moment is a rebirth of the previous moment. Western medicine
has M.D. accounts of patients reporting events when they were clinically dead.
Bottom line. There is no Buddhism without both karma and rebirth. Without
karma and rebirth, Buddhism would be completely useless and meaningless. In
sum, Buddhism is the teaching about karma and rebirth.
You are calling impermanence (the momentary existence) of all things rebirth. What
impermanence really means is that there is no abiding self in things. There is no self in things,
so how could that self be reborn from instant to instant?
Top

byDechenNorbuSunOct23,201112:30pm
Kyosan wrote:
deepbluehum wrote:
Actions have consequences, that's just common sense. Western religions
believe in rebirth in hell or heaven. Islam believes you are reborn from
hell to heaven when the punishment is complete. The best explanation
comes from Western metaphysics, every moment the body changes. It is
discontinuous. In Buddhist terms, every moment is a rebirth of the
previous moment. Western medicine has M.D. accounts of patients
reporting events when they were clinically dead.
Bottom line. There is no Buddhism without both karma and rebirth.
Without karma and rebirth, Buddhism would be completely useless and
meaningless. In sum, Buddhism is the teaching about karma and rebirth.
You are calling impermanence (the momentary existence) of all things rebirth.
What impermanence really means is that there is no abiding self in things.
There is no self in things, so how could that self be reborn from instant to
instant?
The concept of rebirth doesn't go against the idea of anatman. The concept of reincarnation,
6/16
14/10/2558
however, does, because it assumes that there is a permanent entity like a soul traveling
through time and taking different bodies. This is not the same as rebirth. You don't have a
self going from this moment to the very next that has more than conceptual existence.
However, to the unenlightened so it seems. Although there's no real self going through this
life, we act as if it did. We live as if it did, die as if it did and take a new birth as if it did.
What there is is a mental continuum, thoughts and feelings perceived by an awareness
unsubstantial that doesn't stop when this body dies. This deep awareness can be found
through meditation and there are experiments which can be performed regarding the
investigation of its starting point by the practitioner.
Rebirth is just a change in circumstances a little deeper than usual. But in essence, life,
death, rebirth and so on are deluded perceptions.
Ron hints that in his original way of saying things. Truly there's no life nor death and these
are but deluded experiences. To gain an insight about this is, IMO, quite important, but also
not that easy for everyone. Gaining a bit of insight about this, also lightens a little our
concerns regarding rebirth and karma. These teachings are quite useful, but not the main
point. They are useful especially when we check our conduct, but even then, the tendency
will be going from sets of rules to a behavior guided by wisdom. When one investigates the
mind deeply enough, one will also realize that even a dramatic set of circumstances such as
death doesn't put an end to consciousness. It's just a change, a little faster than the usual
changes which are constantly occurring all around. i.e., I had a body in the past that is no
more, only a result remains, my adult body. I had feelings and ideas in the past that are no
more, only this awareness of what comes and goes. I'm only the result of a person who
doesn't exist any longer. If my memory fails me and I suffer from amnesia, I'll still be the
result of that person, even though I don't share a single atom or a single mental process with
him. Just this awareness that watches changes going on, experiences which are now bright
and vivid and will fade away in the future to the point of oblivion.
Sometimes what we need to try to understand is what is blocking us from a deeper
understanding about rebirth. What makes us prone to dismiss this idea without first giving it
proper thought and putting it to the test? Sometimes we may discover that even without
noticing we have a predilection for a certain system of metaphysical assumptions we've
assimilated during our education. We are tired of knowing that what seems is not always
what is and even though it seems the sun goes around the sky, Earth revolves around the sun,
even though it seems we die and that's it, there may be the case that things are different.
Episodes of people claiming to recall past lives are not rare nor recent. Are they imagining
things? I don't think such is always the case.
Our culture encourages parents to repress recounts of past lives memories if their offspring
manifests them. So it is natural that we don't hear about it often, unless we dig a little. Were
you living in Tibet or in India and probably you'd face a whole different set of beliefs.
We tend to be a little ethnocentric in our worldview, and that is natural. These days such
problem is being lessened, one of the positive effects of globalization (it had to have
something good, for it has so many bad). There were times when according to us proper
people were white and Christian. Otherwise they were considered barbaric, sometimes not
even human.
Well, I'm diverging. Anyway, the point is, it is worth a while to try methods that some people
say will allow you to check for yourself rebirth, karma and so on. Choosing what is not more
than a temporary set of metaphysical predilections in the guise of scientific facts doesn't
seem productive. Science may have a word about many, many subjects, but for the time
being it has no answers to these questions, at least answers properly built according to good
methodological practices and intellectual honesty. So, in the future perhaps, but for now it's
a dead end. Then you have Buddhadharma and its propositions. One of them, taken quite
7/16
14/10/2558
seriously, is that being a good honest person is part of the way to go. If you meet closely
some real practitioners, you'll be impressed with their kindness, honesty and so on. That
doesn't go along well with lying about knowing the truth about rebirth. So perhaps if we listen
to the experts in this field, first understanding why we can consider them so, and when we
put traditional scholastic divergences apart, we will see that they all pretty much speak the
same language. Then we test it ourselves as, so far, we don't seem to be able to get answers
from anywhere else but our own experience. Seems an interesting proposal to me.
Top

bydeepbluehumSunOct23,20115:21pm
Kyosan wrote:
deepbluehum wrote:
Actions have consequences, that's just common sense. Western religions
believe in rebirth in hell or heaven. Islam believes you are reborn from
hell to heaven when the punishment is complete. The best explanation
comes from Western metaphysics, every moment the body changes. It is
discontinuous. In Buddhist terms, every moment is a rebirth of the
previous moment. Western medicine has M.D. accounts of patients
reporting events when they were clinically dead.
Bottom line. There is no Buddhism without both karma and rebirth.
Without karma and rebirth, Buddhism would be completely useless and
meaningless. In sum, Buddhism is the teaching about karma and rebirth.
You are calling impermanence (the momentary existence) of all things rebirth.
What impermanence really means is that there is no abiding self in things.
There is no self in things, so how could that self be reborn from instant to
instant?
Impermanence and rebirth are one teaching. Every moment is a little different than the
previous. The body's condition is always changing from moment to moment. While it has
changed, yet, we continue to use this "body." Thus, moments are discontinuous, each
composed of distinct interdependent conditions. Being distinct yet conventionally useful,
each moment is the rebirth of the previous, and stands in causal relationship to the previous.
This nucleus of operation is at the heart of the Buddhist teaching on rebirth. Because, if
moments always stand in relationship to one another like this, then there is nothing about
death per se that could change this relationship. Each previous moment is death; each
current moment is birth. What dies and is born is never the same. We don't posit an entity,
only a causal stream illustrated by the twelve links and eight consciousness system. What is
reborn has no abiding self and is impermanent. However that is not to say "there is no abiding
self in things, therefore there is no rebirth." The object of negation is the causal stream. It
has no abiding self. This causal stream has the nature of birth, old age, sickness and death.
What is not reborn is the prajnaparamita, buddhanature, nirvanaelement "consciousness
pure luminous all around," etc, because it is like space, is not an object of analysis, because
what cannot be born, cannot die or be reborn. If this mode of description does not suit you
8/16
14/10/2558
due to doctrinal history and allegiances, then I offer the following: Conditionality is, by its
very nature, unborn. What has not come into being, cannot be rendered undone. And, what
cannot be undone cannot be negated, either. Conditionality is "soul" of Buddhism, meaning,
conditionality unknown is samsara, known is nirvana, because once the veil of ignorance is
lifted, a known illusion has no power to deceive, and, without deception, suffering has no
cause.
Top

byOgyenSunOct23,20118:23pm
Dechen Norbu wrote:

Science can't answer that question just yet. In fact, science can't say much
about consciousness, its origin and fate, without helping itself with
metaphysical speculation, even if sometimes that sort of assumptions pass to
the general public as scientific facts. There are some interesting studies about
it, but then you find different interpretations of the results. While some say
that there is strong evidence in favor of a theory supporting reincarnation
(usually people outside Buddhism don't make the difference between rebirth
and reincarnation), others will maintain that such is not the case. The reasons
for such scenario are vast and trying to understand both positions implies
spending some dozens of hours researching and reading about philosophy,
epistemology of science, history of science, sociology etc. Then it is possible to
have some grasp about what's really going on. In the end, what you will have
are opinions covering a large spectrum regarding this matter. You may prefer
some over others, but in the end you will end with your own opinion or not
being able to form one.
If I were to tell you that I knew for a fact that rebirth was a fact, talking about
memories of past lives, you couldn't be sure if I was talking about cold hard
facts or my beliefs mixed with interpretations. So, again you would be stuck in
the testimony of a 3rd party. It won't do much for you in terms of certainty.
Regarding your observations about nature, there are many cases of people who
seem to have unexplained memories and feelings concerning what some assume
to be past lives. Thousands of cases were already reported. Some are
explainable, some hardly. You never seen an electron, a molecule or a
supernova. Yet you trust experts word on this. You can try to figure out who are
those you can consider experts about this subject of rebirth. Scientists? Not for
me. Some Buddhist teachers? It's for you to decide.
In the end, it boils down to your own experience, since it seems that this
phenomena is quite hidden and not easy to verify. Deepen your practice to a
point in which you know for yourself if rebirth is a fact. When you discover, you
may say to others that you know for a fact that rebirth theory can be
confirmed, but then others will have nothing but your word to rely upon. If they
wish to know for themselves, they need to follow the procedure and train their
mind as you did.
By the way, I am thinking about an apple right now. There's no science on Earth
that can prove this to be true. This doesn't mean I can't think about an apple
9/16
14/10/2558
right now, though. I know I am. Is it possible for you to think about an apple
right now? Try it for yourself and tell me. However, to be sure that you indeed
can think about an apple at this very moment, I would have to read your mind.
Not even a polygraph could guarantee that you were speaking the truth, as we
have nothing able to measure or detect mental phenomena directly (it's useful
to avoid mistaking them for their neural correlates).
So, there you have it. IMO, the only way out in the current state of affairs is for
you to try it for yourself. It will be a hell of a quest as it seems training your
mind to such a point takes years of dedicated practice, thousands or tens of
thousands hours of meditation and perhaps some more hundreds of hours
studying. In the end you will know, but it's a knowledge obtained in a way that
can't be proven to a 3rd person. Gladly, knowing for a fact that rebirth is true
or not seems to bring many other positive side effects to our mind.
worth your while.
So it may
I guess, if you really wanna know, find a way to find out.
Top

bycoldmountainSunOct23,201110:43pm
Thanks for all the responses everyone.
Food_Eatah wrote:
Not believing in rebirth will hinder your cultivation. Your more likely to commit
alot of wrong doing and regress in your progress, because temptations are too
strong to with standing without a more solid faith on consequences from bad
karma.
I can accept this as valid. What we believe about life after death will of course have profound
effects on how we live this life.
Bhikkhu Bodhi wrote an essay called 'Does Rebirth Make Sense', in which he simply explains
the philosophical coherence of the idea. (http://www.accesstoinsight.org/lib/auth ...
ay_46.html (http://www.accesstoinsight.org/lib/authors/bodhi/bpsessay_46.html) )
I find many things in this essay that speak to me, but I also know that just because it sounds
intuitively appealing, it is not then real. It all seems to really come down to whether the
universe is really 'like that'. Does cause and effect really extend to a moral dimension of
existence? Does the mind survive death? These are of course very important questions but it
seems that no matter what, one is encouraged to accept certain propositions merely on
faith.
10/16
14/10/2558
In my own life I've walked away from this type of faith, and my walking away has led me to
Buddhism. Buddhism's premises are very potent, but it is disturbing to me that one of its
central premises is so 'out there' from my perspective.
Now I know others have been ready to point out that Buddhism is not like that, that it
encourages actual practice to test the teachings out for oneself. I agree that in a very
genuine way Buddhism seems to be like that. I'd like to be able to just keep an open mind and
practice meditation without focusing on such questions, but it seems that important issues
like this cannot just be left on the backburner for me.
Peace.
Top

byKyosanMonOct24,20114:22am
deepbluehum wrote:
Impermanence and rebirth are one teaching. Every moment is a little different
than the previous. The body's condition is always changing from moment to
moment. While it has changed, yet, we continue to use this "body." Thus,
moments are discontinuous, each composed of distinct interdependent
conditions. Being distinct yet conventionally useful, each moment is the rebirth
of the previous, and stands in causal relationship to the previous. This nucleus
of operation is at the heart of the Buddhist teaching on rebirth. Because, if
moments always stand in relationship to one another like this, then there is
nothing about death per se that could change this relationship. Each previous
moment is death; each current moment is birth. What dies and is born is never
the same. We don't posit an entity, only a causal stream illustrated by the
twelve links and eight consciousness system. What is reborn has no abiding self
and is impermanent. However that is not to say "there is no abiding self in
things, therefore there is no rebirth." The object of negation is the causal
stream. It has no abiding self. This causal stream has the nature of birth, old
age, sickness and death. What is not reborn is the prajnaparamita, buddha
nature, nirvanaelement "consciousness pure luminous all around," etc, because
it is like space, is not an object of analysis, because what cannot be born,
cannot die or be reborn. If this mode of description does not suit you due to
doctrinal history and allegiances, then I offer the following: Conditionality is,
by its very nature, unborn. What has not come into being, cannot be rendered
undone. And, what cannot be undone cannot be negated, either. Conditionality
is "soul" of Buddhism, meaning, conditionality unknown is samsara, known is
nirvana, because once the veil of ignorance is lifted, a known illusion has no
power to deceive, and, without deception, suffering has no cause.
Thanks for your explanation deepbluehum. I think we are very much in agreement on both
what impermanence and the self is. I wasn't sure what you meant by the word "rebirth" and
that's why I responded to your post.
I think of impermanence like this. At every moment a new moment appears and the old
moment disappears. This process is driven by cause and effect and there is no self that
11/16
14/10/2558
persists in objects from moment to moment. We see forms of objects in our minds and think
that there is a permanent self in these objects but in reality there isn't. I think that is the
same thing you said.
Top

bySherabDorjeMonOct24,20117:42am
edearl wrote:
Food_Eatah wrote:
Not believing in rebirth will hinder your cultivation. Your more likely to
commit alot of wrong doing and regress in your progress, because
temptations are too strong to with standing without a more solid faith
on consequences from bad karma.
I guess I don't understand. If you have infinite chances to do right and have good
karma, it seems to me one would be more likely to be bad in this life, and put
off working to be good. If you only have one chance, you better be good the
first time. N'estce pas?
You are overlooking one major detail: most of the people that do not believe in rebirth also
do not believe in any form of "after life". If there is no continuity, no outcome to action
except for that experienced during this incredibly brief span of time we call a lifetime, then
why engage in positive actions for the benefit of others? Without rebirth or some notion of an
afterlife there is no tangible reason to engage in positive/virtuous actions, if they do not
bring instant (or at least in the short term) personal gratification.
Top

byThug4lyfeMonOct24,20118:05am
Not believing in rebirth and what happens after the death of our current physical form is a
dangerous view in my opinion. Buddhism specifically talks about 4 maras that hinders us. The
Mara of our mental afflictions, the mara of the 5 aggregates (skandhs), the mara of DEATH
and the mara of wrong views.
If you've read ksitigarbha sutra, it describes rebirth in hell from many bad karma is a very
painful and time wasting hinderance to our practice. Because it will take us out of the picture
for a long long time. Not to mention the hungry ghost and animal rebirth.
Now, let's say you believe in rebirth and it turns out to be false.... whats the worst can
happen? Other people on the internet laughs that your an ignorant superstitious religious
freak? Does that really matter after your dead? Now if rebirth is real and it's controlled by
12/16
14/10/2558
Karma, does people's laughs really matter? People who practice "superstitious" deeds like
chanting the Buddha's name and seeking help from Ksitigarbha Bodhisattva etc will be saved.
Who is laughing then?
Now, lets also thinking what are the "terrible consequences" of believing in rebirth terrifying
you into doing superstitious deeds like:
1. Stop stealing
2. Stop slandering other people
3. Stop supporting the porn industry by being one of the downloader, being one less patron in
the club picking up girls, instead getting married based on reason, compassion and respect
4. Stop drinking alcohol and doing drugs
5. Have way less fun for yourself, in doing so having more money to help others?
Top

bySherabDorjeMonOct24,20119:16am
Inevitably in these discussions (and they have been held on countless occasions, on countless
Buddhist forums) one turns to the Buddhas teachings on the Four Assurances (from every
sceptics favorite sutta: The Kalamas Sutta)
"Now, Kalamas, one who is a disciple of the noble ones his mind thus free
from hostility, free from ill will, undefiled, & pure acquires four assurances
in the here&now:
"'If there is a world after death, if there is the fruit of actions rightly & wrongly
done, then this is the basis by which, with the breakup of the body, after
death, I will reappear in a good destination, the heavenly world.' This is the
first assurance he acquires.
"'But if there is no world after death, if there is no fruit of actions rightly &
wrongly done, then here in the present life I look after myself with ease free
from hostility, free from ill will, free from trouble.' This is the second
assurance he acquires.
"'If evil is done through acting, still I have willed no evil for anyone. Having
done no evil action, from where will suffering touch me?' This is the third
"'But if no evil is done through acting, then I can assume myself pure in both
respects.' This is the fourth assurance he acquires.
"One who is a disciple of the noble ones his mind thus free from hostility,
free from ill will, undefiled, & pure acquires these four assurances in the
here&now."
"So it is, Blessed One. So it is, O One Wellgone. One who is a disciple of the
noble ones his mind thus free from hostility, free from ill will, undefiled, &
pure acquires four assurances in the here&now:
13/16
14/10/2558
"'If there is a world after death, if there is the fruit of actions rightly & wrongly
done, then this is the basis by which, with the breakup of the body, after
death, I will reappear in a good destination, the heavenly world.' This is the
first assurance he acquires.
"'But if there is no world after death, if there is no fruit of actions rightly &
wrongly done, then here in the present life I look after myself with ease free
from hostility, free from ill will, free from trouble.' This is the second
"'If evil is done through acting, still I have willed no evil for anyone. Having
done no evil action, from where will suffering touch me?' This is the third
"'But if no evil is done through acting, then I can assume myself pure in both
ways.' This is the fourth assurance he acquires.
"One who is a disciple of the noble ones his mind thus free from hostility,
free from ill will, undefiled, & pure acquires these four assurances in the
here&now.
So really, it seems that one should not "waste" ones time trying to convince oneself of the
validitiy or not of rebirth but merely keep ones "...mind thus free from hostility, free from ill
will, undefiled, & pure..." and get on with the game!!!
Top

byedearlMonOct24,201110:14am
gregkavarnos wrote:
edearl wrote:
Food_Eatah wrote:
Not believing in rebirth will hinder your cultivation. Your
more likely to commit alot of wrong doing and regress in
your progress, because temptations are too strong to with
standing without a more solid faith on consequences from
bad karma.
I guess I don't understand. If you have infinite chances to do right and

have good karma, it seems to me one would be more likely to be bad in
this life, and putoff working to be good. If you only have one chance,
you better be good the first time. N'estce pas?
You are overlooking one major detail: most of the people that do not believe in
rebirth also do not believe in any form of "after life". If there is no continuity,
no outcome to action except for that experienced during this incredibly brief
span of time we call a lifetime, then why engage in positive actions for the
benefit of others? Without rebirth or some notion of an afterlife there is no
14/16
14/10/2558
tangible reason to engage in positive/virtuous actions, if they do not bring

instant (or at least in the short term) personal gratification.
Umm. There are those, like Buddhists who believe in many reincarnations, others like
Christians and Muslims who believe in one life and an afterlife, and those who do not believe
in any afterlife. There is a fear among many that people who do not believe in an afterlife
will be villains more than people who do believe in an afterlife. I don't know if a poll on that
issue has ever been done. However, I am aware of a few people who do not believe in an
afterlife, yet choose to live a moral life.
I rejected Christianity more than 50 years ago, and lived without religion for over 50 years,
and have not killed anyone, in fact I have not often killed anything including insects, have not
stolen anything, except as a child when I was Christian, do not lie, usually not even white
lies, and follow other moral values too. When I was a young man, I realized the world
population would, soon after my 75th birthday be so overcrowded that people would starve
en masse; thus, I had a vasectomy and have not had children. I've reared a family of two step
children and been married 25 years. Why? Partly because I want to be known and
remembered as being a good person by friends and family. However, the biggest reason is
that I wanted to live with myself without regrets.
If punishment was a deterrent, countries with the death penalty, like the US, would have
extremely low rates of crimes with capital punishment sentences, but that is not the case.
The death penalty is not a deterrent. Similarly, I doubt punishment in an afterlife is
punishment. Moreover, I doubt religion makes better people. In fact, I left my Christian family
because their religion was being used to justify bad things, like bigotry and war. I think social
pressure on people, whether they are religious or not, has a powerful effect on people's
morals, and the need for people to live together and cooperate has led to moral values,
which are partly inherent and partly learned.
It is impossible to cleanly divide the affects of nurture and nature. However, people tend to
be squeamish about gutting a dead animal. They tend to dislike viewing or touching dead
people. A cat likes to play with its prey before killing it, but people want to put an animal out
of its misery when they kill. The moral values of all cultures are remarkably very similar,
everywhere on earth. These are some examples of behaviors I believe illustrate people have
inherent moral values. I think my ideas about morality are radical. I was compelled to
contemplate why I am person who follows accepted moral values.
I almost didn't send this post, because it seems too argumentative. I hope it isn't.
Metta
Top
PreviousNextDisplaypostsfromprevious: Allposts
Ascending
Go
Sortby Posttime
Postareply
773postsPage2of391,2,3,4,5...39
ReturntoOpenDharma
Jumpto: OpenDharma
Go
15/16
14/10/2558
Who is online
Usersbrowsingthisforum:Lazy_eye,websat11and1guest
2015DavidN.Snyder,Ph.D.,VipassanaFoundationinassociationwithTheDhammaEncyclopedia
DharmaWheelisassociatedwithDhammaWheel.com,DhammaWiki.com,andTheDhamma.com..
Chatroom
>
16/16

Dharma Wheel - View Topic - Are Karma and Rebirth Real - 2

Загружено:

Сведения о документе

Оригинальное название

Авторское право

Доступные форматы

Поделиться этим документом

Поделиться или встроить документ

Параметры публикации

Этот документ был вам полезен?

Это неприемлемый материал?

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

Dharma Wheel - View Topic - Are Karma and Rebirth Real - 2

Загружено:

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

14/10/2558

Are Karma and Rebirth Real?

Re: are karma and rebirth for real? (#p62341)

Re: are karma and rebirth for real? (#p62348)

Thanks for your response Dechen Norbu,

Re: are karma and rebirth for real? (#p62349)

I beg to differ. It is quite different.

Re: are karma and rebirth for real? (#p62351)

Buddhism asks you to see for yourself, and then believe.

Re: are karma and rebirth for real? (#p62354)

Rebirth, yes, can only be inferred.

Re: are karma and rebirth for real? (#p62358)

In order to understand whether god exists or not, we need to understand emptiness

Re: are karma and rebirth for real? (#p62360)

Re: are karma and rebirth for real? (#p62364)

Re: are karma and rebirth for real? (#p62392)

Re: are karma and rebirth for real? (#p62400)

Re: are karma and rebirth for real?

Re: are karma and rebirth for real? (#p62401)

Re: are karma and rebirth for real? (#p62415)

Re: are karma and rebirth for real? (#p62444)

Re: are karma and rebirth for real? (#p62474)

Dechen Norbu wrote:

I guess, if you really wanna know, find a way to find out.

Re: are karma and rebirth for real? (#p62493)

Thanks for all the responses everyone.

Re: are karma and rebirth for real? (#p62520)

Re: are karma and rebirth for real? (#p62535)

Re: are karma and rebirth for real? (#p62538)

Re: are karma and rebirth for real? (#p62550)

Re: are karma and rebirth for real? (#p62560)

I guess I don't understand. If you have infinite chances to do right and

tangible reason to engage in positive/virtuous actions, if they do not bring

Вам также может понравиться