Magyars, Moricz and Mother Languages

Magyars, Moricz and Mother Language
from GoldLybrary Website
"When the contents of the Metal Library are

known, there will be no more wars!"
Juan Moricz
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/arqueologia/cueva_tayos03.htm (1 de 18)22/08/2014 14:31:57
Proof on film, made in 1976, showing Ecuadorian archaeologist and journalist

Presley Norton naming Andres Fernndez Salvador as the person who first informed
Juan Moricz about the Tayos Caves treasure [in the mid-1960s].
Solo para Internet Explorer
En FireFox usar AddOn 'Enhanced IE Tab'
Thanks to the initiative of scholar/translator Dr. Gyorgy Sipos, Hungarian speakers can
now read Stan Hall's coordinated information on the matchless role the Magyar language
and Magyar scholars must play - however daunting the task - in revising, facilitating, and
correcting the translation of Egyptian, Sumerian, and other ancient inscriptions, thus
bringing to scholars, and to the public in general, a fuller and truer understanding of world
history.
Juan Moricz believed that history lacks global vision; that, after the Deluge, the so-called
New World of the Americas became the mother of civilization and that its culture was
ancient Magyar:
that European and Middle-Eastern cultures had appeared suddenly,

without the indispensable logic of evolutionary development
that these cultures were transported from the Americas, where their
evolutionary antecedents are simple to identify
that some groups survived the Deluge, but those on the crests of the
Andes were primarily responsible for the post-diluvian dispersion of
knowledge and culture
that between 8000 and 7000 BC they arrived in Lower Mesopotamia
in boats made from balsa wood found only in South America
that, in Ecuador, place names like Shumir, Zumir, Shammar, Mosul
and an infinity of others found mainly in the province of Azuay, identify
this region of South America as the motherland of the ancient
Sumerians, or Zumirs, whose language is a derivation of proto-Magyar
"The Neolithic settlement in Mehgarh, located within the physiographic region

of upper Sindth, has revealed that human settlement in the Indus region
dates back to the 6th millennium BC."
Prof. Mohammed Rafique Mughal, Boston University (March 2007)
The Magyars of the Carpathian Mountains of Europe are of American origin, said Moricz:
upon leaving the Andes they brought across the Atlantic idiomatic elements
of the Magyar language, together with an accumulation of legends, traditions
and beliefs: that, in Ecuador - as elsewhere in the Americas - the Cayapos,
Jibaro-Shuar, Tschachis, Saragurus, Salasakas and others speak versions of
the old Magyar tongue; that place-names and dialects of Ecuador, although
many have been eroded by acculturalisation, or eliminated by force, are
numerous.
The similarity between the old Magyar and Sumerian tongues, declared Moricz, cannot be
attributed to coincidence: apart from philological similarities - such as nap for 'light of the
Sun', Ur for 'lord' and Isten for 'god' - there are ethnographic, religious, artistic and folkloric
connections.
At the end of the 8th Century AD, a Magyar people, the Karas (royal Scythians or White
Huns), emigrated from India across the great eastern sea {the Sinus Magnus of Ptolemy} to
their solar Motherland in South America; these being the same Caras who, according to
late 18th Century father of Ecuadorian prehistory, Padre Juan de Velasco, arrived that
same century in what has since been called the Bahia de Caraquez, in the province of
Manabi.
Too little is known of this amazing man, Juan Moricz, born Janos Moricz Opos, in
Hungary, in 1923; and, because he wrote so little, that is probably how it will remain. There
are explorers who organize expeditions of a lifetime to experience what he lived daily.
He was a brilliant, charming, but difficult and stubborn man. Before armchair critics identify
him as a mere adventurer, here follows a list of specialists - apparently invisible to western
scholars - who responded to an enquiry concerning possible Magyar-Quechua
connections, sent by the Ecuadorian Ministry of Foreign Relations at the request of Moricz.
Their collective response is no less astounding than the silent neglect presently accorded
to their work.
Magyar Specialists
Dr Barna Ksa - Melbourne, Australia: Specialized in the cultures of

Mesopotamia, Palestine, and Anatolia [Turkey]. Has verified and
ratified the hypotheses of Juan Moricz with respect to cultural diffusion
from America and the American origin of the Magyars. Has issued
publications for half-a-century including a paper concerning the
discoveries of Juan Morcz.
Dr. Lzl Rimanczy - NSW, Australia: Member of Scientific Societies
in Belguim. Sumerologist specialized in the cultural exchange
between America and Mesopotamia. Has realized studies on
dynasties that ruled the ancient Kingdom of the Kitus {Quito}.
Confirms the studies of Juan Morcz.
Gyula Szentirmay - NSW, Australia: Friend of renowned investigator
Pataky Klmn: Scientific intermediary between Klmn and Juan
Morcz. Compiling 50 years of work on the American origin of the
Magyars into a book.
Lzl Turmezei - Investigator: ex-member of the Academy of
Sciences of Hungary. A leading authority on Malaysia, Polynesia, etc.
After revising the studies of Morcz he confirmed that his discovery
open the doors for a complete revision of the history of the American
Continent.
Alexander Cske - Schlossberg 2, Austria: Philologist specializing in
the languages of the Caucasus, the Urals, Altai etc. Since the
discoveries of Juan Moricz has been dedicated to the pre-colombian
tongues of Ecuador and has confirmed Moricz's American origin and
cultural diffusion of the Magyars.
Dr. Tibor Barth - Montreal, Canada: Many years professor of History
and Geography at the Sorbonne, Paris. Leading investigator of
Sumerian and Egyptian cultures. His publication on Mesopotamian
cultures mentions the discoveries of Juan Morcz as an important

clarification of prehistory.
Dr. Dnes Gergely - Ontario, Canada: Eminent linguist who spent

many years in Central and South America investigating the origin of
the Magyars. Has confirmed the hypothesis of Juan Morcz, having
arrived at similar conclusions after comparative studies between
Magyar and the pre-colombian languages of the Republic of Colombia.
Dr. Szllosy S. Said - Germany: Investigator specialized in the
cultures of Central and South America and analyzer of the
connections of the latter with Europe and the Near East. In a
publication has ratified the discoveries of Juan Morcz regarding
cultural diffusion from the Americas.
Elemr Homonnay - Cleveland, Ohio, USA: professor of History and
Geography. Specialist in pre-colombian cultures and their Magyar
relationships.
Others with whom Morcz corresponded were
Dr. Gosztony, the Sorbonne, Paris

Dr. Alfredo Tagliabue, professor of History and Geography at the
Universidad de la Plata, Argentina
historian Dr. Alfredo Kolliker Freers - President of the Universidad
Argentina de Ciencias Sociales.
Many of the above scholars are of Magyar background, which may be advantageous or
not, but seldom are reputations risked lightly. All are evidently versed in Magyar history and
language and offer a unique opportunity for western scholars to study their work.
The Hungar - Magyar Key to the Sumerian and Egyptian

Cultures
(after Dr. Tibor Barth and Dr. Lszl Marcz)
Something important in the investigation of early civilization and language is presently at a
standstill because principal factions debating the origin of the Magyar-Hungarian language,
that is, the Finno-Ugrian and/or Turkish faction and the Sumerian faction which include,
on all sides, Hungarian-speaking scholars, cannot agree. Well, if they cannot agree. And
the Finno-Ugrian would appear to carry prevailing opinion, maybe there is room for my
synthesis of the work of a few scholars championing the Magyar-Sumerian cause.
On May the 22nd, 1997, a linguistic conference was held in the grounds of Gdll
Agricultural University, participation by invitation only.
The organizer was Dr. Sndor Gyri Nagy, who invited the following scholars:
Jnos Pntek (Kolozsvr),

Gyrgy Papp (Ujvidk),
Jen Kiss and Gza Balzs (ELTE),
Gbor Pap (Gdll/Miskolc),
Jzsef P. Pesti (Kalocsa),
Lszl Marcz (Amsterdam).
The goal was to discuss the present state of linguistics in Hungary, which has heretofore
been forced to adhere to either the Finno-Ugrian or the Turkish line of linguistic theory,
totally neglecting the Magyar line of word origins.
The participants agreed on the following:
1. The origin of the Magyar language cannot be fully and successfully
researched within the constraints of the currently prevailing FinnoUgrian theory, which is untenable from a linguistic and scientific point
of view.
2. The main aim of Magyar linguistics is to fully research and bring to
light the internal structure of the language.
3. Only then can it be compared to other Eurasian languages, its
relationships with which will be then thoroughly researched.
4. The evaluation will be done very systematically and with great care.
The Editorial Staff of the Journal of Hungarian Studies print a news item which covered the
following issues.
The Magyar language was banned in schools during the Habsburg regime (15th 20th
Century). In 1826, Count Istvn Szchenyi formed and funded the Hungarian Academy of
Sciences to uphold the Magyar language and culture. Following his death in 1860, the
Habsburgs effectively took control of the Academy
The Gdll conference will be the first step in re-establishing Count Szchenyis ideals.
Sndor Csomo de Koros reports:

The linguist and diplomat Sir John Bowring wrote the following about the
Magyar language in 1830:
The Hungarian language goes far back. It developed in a very
peculiar manner and its structure reaches back to times when
most of the now spoken European languages did not even
exist. It is a language which developed steadily and firmly in
itself, and in which there are logic and mathematics with the
adaptability and malleability of strength and chords. The
Englishman should be proud that his language indicates an
epic of human history.
One can show forth its origin; and alien layers can be
distinguished in it, which gathered together during the contacts
with different nations. Whereas the Hungarian language is like
a rubble-stone, consisting of only one piece, on which the
storms of time left not a scratch. It is not a calendar that adjusts
to the changes of the ages. It needs no-one, it doesnt borrow,
does no buckstering, and doesnt give or take from anyone.
This language is the oldest and most glorious monument of
national sovereignty and mental independence. What scholars
cannot solve, they ignore. In philology its the same way as in
archaeology. The floors of the old Egyptian temples, which
were made out of only one rock, cant be explained.
No one knows where they came from, or from which mountain
the wondrous mass was taken. How they were transported and
lifted to the top of the temples. The genuineness of the
Hungarian language is a phenomenon much more wondrous
than this.
He who will solve that will analyze a divine secret, the first
thesis of which is: In the beginning was the Word, and the
Word was with God, and the Word was God.
...and continuing...
The often-quoted Bowring opinion brings up a few new questions.
First of all what is he talking about in this quotation? Second, where did he
receive his knowledge of the Magyar language and the courage to declare
these about the Magyar language. Thirdly, what is the divine secret of which
he speaks. Let us try to answer these questions. Bowring, when he talks
about language thinks of the vocabulary, according to the practice of his day.
He knows, that the lexical elements of the Magyar language are very old, and
developed according to their inner order. The origin of the lexical order is
rooted in the spiritual realm. We may suppose that Bowring who spoke the
Magyar language himself first of all knew this secret, otherwise he would not
have composed his statement in such a mystical yet secure way.
What he could not do was to research the secret of the Magyar language
since there was no writing on this subject in his time and it is not very likely
that he would have discovered it.
This could have come only from a man, whose mother tongue was Magyar,
who was a linguist, who knew the basis of the theoretical Indian linguistics,
the grammatics of Panini about the Sanskrit language, who was well versed
in the ancient culture languages, like the Sumerian, the Sanskrit, etc. which
he could compare with the Magyar, and knew the ancient cultures and their
spiritual wisdom.
All these attributes could have been present in 1830 in only one person,
named Sndor Csoma de Krs. This supposition is strengthened by the fact
that Bowring knew and even supported him.
So we may well suppose that Bowring was introduced into the divine secrets
of the Magyar language by Csoma de Krs.
Begin at the Beginning!

Two languages flourished in the Ancient East.
One, Sumerian, originated north of the Tigris and Euphrates basin,

coming to full bloom in Szemr (Sumer, Sumir), spreading southward,
then westward to the Mediterranean.
The other was Ancient Egyptian. Both are believed to be the world's
oldest languages.
These languages matched exactly the territories where Hungar-Magyar peoples

represented the culture-bearing population. There is no historical evidence that the
languages were actually called Sumerian or Egyptian by the indigenous cultures or recordkeepers of the time.
These names were adopted by scholars of the 19th century AD, not as names for the
people or their languages, but only as geographical markers.
Sumerian:
The texts we call Sumerian were written in pictographs for older texts and
cuneiform writing for younger texts. Scholars have hardly touched the
pictographs. Few, if any, have been read. The reason for this is that they can
only yield their meaning and sound values in accordance with the real
Sumerian language, namely Magyar (Hungarian).
Current views on the Sumerian language are based on the cuneiform texts.
Cuneiform signs usually mark only the consonants, which may be read
without knowing the real Sumerian language, but neither exposes the nouns
nor how to break the text into words.
Egyptian:
Egyptian texts, also, used simplified pictures, developing later a simplified
form of lettering called hieroglyphs made from the pictures. These, too,
marked only the consonants. Vowels have to be added according to the spirit
of the language. Egyptologists read only the newer hieroglyphic texts but
they are unable to deduce with certainty the nature of the accompanying
vowels or how the text should be broken into words.
Hard and soft consonants were frequently represented with the same sign
(T=D, P=B, S=SZ, K=G, R=L) so there are considerable possibilities for
errors in transcribing the texts into modern alphabets.
Either scholars never think of employing the Hungarian alphabet or the
Habsburg factor is still prevalent. Yet, basing transliteration on the English
spelling-system, how can they mark the Hungarian GY, TY, LY sounds which
have a firmly established spelling system in Hungarian? The same word or
name is translated according to the nationality of the translator, as in the
case of the Muger ruins in the city of Ur, or in other Hungar and Magyar
names.
A scholar can believe he knows the pronunciation but cannot find in his
alphabet the symbol for the perceived sound, so he may use a symbol of
{say} the Italian alphabet. What might ensue from this same text if, say, a
German scholar transliterates according to the German alphabet?
The foremost prerequisite for attaining the proper sounds and transliteration of ancient
scripts is familiarity with the language and its rules of pronunciation.
Non-Hungarian speaking researchers lack the magic language {Magyar} key to unlock the
secret. They resort to replacement keys. Mesopotamian Sumerian is translated with the
help of Persian, Assyrian and, most of all, Hebrew.
Egyptian is translated with the help of the Coptic and Greek languages.
Consequently, words transliterated from Sumerian and Egyptian may lack vowels at critical
points or have vowels introduced unnecessarily. The resulting transcription is a distortion of
the original, in Sumerian and in Egyptian. The errors in the transliteration-translation
process understandably evolve a language that does not resemble any known language truly a language without relatives!
The uncertain sound-values of the Sumerian and Egyptian languages and incorrect
transliteration of original characteristics were noted by Orientalists. {Prof. Lawrence
Austine} Waddell reproached linguists for basing the transcriptions of Mesopotamian
Sumerian texts on the Assyrian language.
These scholars, says Waddell,
"begin their work laden with false racial and religious theories and do not
have a key to the sound-values of personal names, which we inherited with
Sumerian signs that had several sound-values.
(Lloyd Seton: Foundations in the Dust, Bristol 1955, p.121).
The destruction of the Sumerian language took on such proportions that the
first translations proved useless and had to be laid aside.
(Samuel Noah Kramer, Sumerian Mythology, New York 1961 p.22.)
Samuel Kramer, an American Sumerologist, himself took extensive liberties in

translating Sumerian texts into English, resulting in something completely different from
what is written.
He faced seemingly insurmountable problems (Sumerian Mythology pg. 65, 68, 69, 73, 7577) because so often he only feels the meaning of the words based on the text surrounding
it (S.N.Kramer: Twenty-Five Firsts in Man's Recorded History; From the Tablets of Sumer,
Indian Hills, 1956).
We fare no better with the Egyptian hieroglyphs. Sir Wallis Budge affirms that the
pronunciation of a great number of words, mostly verbs, cannot be ascertained. (Budge, E.
A.W. Egyptian Language. Easy lessons in Egyptian hieroglyphics with sign list. London,
1958, p.146 and passim).
The great French Egyptologist, Maspero, laments:
"It is our endeavour that we attempt the pronunciation of the Egyptian words,
but it may lead only to marginal results because we never know with
sufficient certainty how they sounded. Our only recourse is that we establish
what sound-values some of the words had in Greek times, as far as this is
possible."
(Maspero G.: History of Egypt, Chaldea, Syria, Babilonia and Assyria. 6.vol.
London, s.d. I, VI)
"The general pronunciation of the Egyptian names in our days is not so much
Egyptian, but Egyptologian; in other words, pronunciation according to
Egyptologists."
(Ceram C.W. A Hettitk Regnye, Hungarian translation by Mrton Hegyi
Budapest, 1964, p.26).
In the orthography of names, complete confusion reigns throughout the scholarly literature.
(Ceram C.W. The Secret of the Hittites, V; New York, 1956.)
It is hardly necessary to say that differences of opinion exist among scholars as to the
method in which hieroglyphic characters should be transcribed into Roman letters, (Budge
E. Wallis Egyptian language; Easy lessons in Egyptian hieroglyphics with sign list. London,
1958 - p.32).
Since in hieroglyphic writing only the consonants and not the vowels are indicated our
reading of Egyptian names is only a compromise and we do not pretend that our form of
transcription renders the names as they were pronounced. (Tutankhamun Treasures.
Trsors de Toutankhamon. Montreal, 1964 - p. 4)
In certain instances it is difficult to read the written text well and find its true meaning, even
with knowledge of the rules of this writing and reading, and use of the only good key, the
Hungarian language, in establishing the sound values. We are dealing with the spiritual
heritage of a world of 4-5000 years ago. The working of minds then was different, a
difficulty that can only be bridged if we become familiar with the belief systems of the ages
BC.
Egyptian and Sumerian texts frequently use the following names for Sungod:
gr
Szkr
Kerek r
Napr
sr
Magr
tr
Honr
Szemr
get r
Vrs Szem,
and at least twenty more expressions...
Western scholars unfamiliar with the key-Magyar language understand only the r suffix,
which they translate as God.
They believe that, since many names end with r, many gods were worshipped. For these
scholars there is a God An, God Utu, God Sek and so on.
Anyone familiar with the key language will recognize the above as names for the same
Sungod; the ancients stressed each characteristic of the Sungod by a given name. We can
compare this with the Roman Catholic Church calling God the Father in his creative
capacity, the Son in his redemptive capacity and the Holy Spirit in his sanctifying
capacity.
The Sun, a heavenly body, is God's visible picture.
since the picture is round, he is Kerek r (Round Lord)

since the Sun brightens and sees everything like a giant eye another
name is Szemr (Occulate Lord)
since his eye is single, they call him Egyszem (One Eyed) and,
according to the Sun's color, Vrs Szem (Red Eyed)
since the Sun resides in the sky they also called him gi Szem or
gszem (Eye of Heavens)
given its immense heat they called him get r (Scorching Lord) and
St r (Shining Lord)
They also believed that he is the only Lord in this world, so they called him,
Honr (Lord of his Home) and gi Kirly (King of Heavens)

his motion-name at sunrise is Ra-Kel (Ra rises)
his rising on the eastern borders Kel-t (The Road of Rising/East)
where he sits down onto his chair, Szk-r (Lord of the Chair or the
Seated/Settled Lord)
later, he sits in his chariot to travel the shiny roads of the skies as tr
(Lord of the Road)
when he finishes his daily journey in the west, Nyug-t (Resting/
Western Road)
finally, as he sinks below the horizon, Est, Este (The Falling/Evening
Road, Evening)
All becomes clear when we realize that ancients whose religion was connected with the
Sun were never polytheistic but worshipped one solar God!

The ancient theologians substituted the names of their God with symbols, pictures that had
no apparent relationship with their God but were useful as symbols that convey sounds.
The sentences and prayers they created appear incomprehensible today.
For example, when they write God's name as,
g-r (Lord of Heaven) they draw a mouse (Egr)

Szkr (The Seated/Settled Lord) is conveyed by a wagon (szekr)
Kerek-r (Round Lord) is represented by a wagon-wheel (kerk)
ri-s (Ancestral Lord) with a giant (ris)
...and so on.
How could anyone unfamiliar with Hungarian find his way among the symbols? When is it
proper to talk about the Lord of Heaven (gr) and when the animal (egr) that represents
his name on Earth? (For similar reasons the Babylonians worshipped a mouse). We are not
idol-worshippers when we pray before statues in the churches, rather worshipping the
essence of what they symbolize.
We often find in the late Stone and Bronze Ages a tiny bronze-wagon on the altar. This did
not signify worship of the wagon but the meaning the artifact conveyed as one of the
names of the Sungod Szkr or Az-g-Ur (The Seated/Settled God or The Lord of Heaven).
It is surely vitally important - especially for Hungarians - to understand the true form of the
Sumerian and Egyptian languages. The word-plays egr - gr (mouse - Lord of Heaven),
szekr - Szkr (wagon road) are perfectly clear in the Hungarian language, as it is in case
of Szemr when his name is written with the image of a donkey (szamr).
These ancients never worshipped crocodiles, snakes, frogs and insects. Historians should
know this is as a figment of the imagination, just as much as the supposed relativeless
Sumerian and Egyptian languages.
Since it is difficult to transcribe the ancient Eastern texts into today's alphabets few are
willing to try. Study of the near one-hundred-thousand known Sumerian and Egyptian
literary texts known to scholars has hardly progressed (S.N. Kramer Sumerian Mythology
New York, 1961, VIII).
Present transcribed texts are unsuitable for linguistic studies, a problem appreciated by A.
Nehring, a German scholar, who remarked as early as 1936:
"Thus far there was no attempt to make use of the grammar, study of sound
and structure and sentences in connection with the problems of the history of
the ancients."
Something is seriously wrong with the old languages presently baptized Sumerian and
Egyptian. The first examiners of the Mesopotamian language called it a Scythian language.
Today they relate it clearly with the Magyar, Finno-Ugrian or Ural-Altaic languages but still
call this language Sumerian.
The name Sumerian was coined in 1869 by Oppert, a French linguist, and was picked up
in the scientific journals of the day .
But Oppert never understood the meaning of Sumer (Szemr = Occulate Lord) and Agade
(get = the Scorching Lord), two different names for the Sungod. The above mentioned
names can be substituted by other names of the Sungod, in territory marking names such
as Hon, K, Ma, and Ta.
There existed a Napotthon (Home of the Sun), a Szemhon (Home of the Occulate Being),
Makor-Ta, Ht-Ta, g-Ta, Szem-Ta, etc ... (The lands of Makar, Ht, g, Szem, are all
names of the same Sungod).
Hungarians and Celts

by Dr. Tibor E. Barth
(Excerpt)
In the present state of our research, we must make use of circumstantial

evidences to learn more about the ethnic identity of the Celts.
A closer look at the manifestations of Celtic civilization convinces us that they
contained no new feature; all their most striking characteristics having
already been evident in the previous, Scythian civilization. These included
the fortified place protected by embankments, ditches and hedges, the
multitude of animal images which pervaded their arts, the use of horses and
sunworship, a heritage from the New Stone Age.
There was only one new addition to Celtic culture: the extensive use of iron.
It follows that the Celts must have been an amalgam of the previous nonIndo-European inhabitants of Europe. This is exactly what scholars have
discovered during the course of their comparative studies. It was found,
indeed, that the Picti of northern Scotland were already Celts early Celts
who called themselves by that word in the form of Khaldes or Chaltis,
which is the Kelti in ancient graphic form. J. Hawkes also places the makers
of the bell-shaped vessels into the category of the Celts.

There too, the peoples of the barrow-graves can be found (i.e. the
Scythians), and also the Turoni, who migrated from Central Europe to the
banks of the Loire, as well as the Secani, who went from Hungary to France,
etc. There were also peoples called Kelto-Scythians, Kelto-Ligurians, KeltIberi. Thus, it is evident that the Celts were not a new race in Europe and the
Celt or Kelti name was used as a comprehensive designation of the entire
pre-Christian population of Europe.
The huge and kindred Celtic mass of BC Europe was linked together by a
common language as well, in addition to the identical elements of their
civilization mentioned above. According to the estimate of Camille Julien
(Paris) a hundred million Europeans spoke the Kelti language in the second
half of the first millennium BC; consequently, there was no linguistic barrier in
ancient Europe.
In spite of these categorical statements, nobody has, alas, identified the
Celtic language, nor proved its affiliation with any other. In that respect we
are still completely in the dark. The reason? Nobody has yet approached the
Celtic problem with the Hungarian key. In the following, we shall try to
analyze the etymological meaning of the fundamental word: Kelti.
Before us, Henri Hubert, the most eminent French specialist of the Celts has
made great efforts to find out the meaning of the Celti name. He carefully
noted all the various graphic forms in which this name occurred and
concluded:
1. that it reached its widest diffusion during the sixth and
fifth centuries BC
2. that it contains the root-word Kel (Quel in French
graphic form), implying the idea to rise
He mentions this meaning as the most probable one, among many other
conjectures listed in a footnote. He could, however, not go any farther in his
explanations, thus the question remained unsolved.
In Hungarian the word Kel signifies to rise and Kelet the cardinal point
where the Sun rises, i.e. Orient, East. And the same word, when the -i suffix
is added as Kelt-i, Kelet-i means He who has come from the direction of the
rising Sun, was spelt in various ways, such as Chaldi, Chaldean and Scoloti.
Like most ancient Hungarian ethnic names, it indicates no ethnic particularity,
but is merely a geographic appellation recalling their previous fatherland.
As such, it was a fitting comprehensive name, because all the pre-IndoEuropean ethnic groups originated from the same region: from the ancient
Orient. Thus the name Kelti or Keleti was the general term designating all the
Hungarian speaking ethnic groups which had migrated to Central and

Western Europe from the ancient Orient since the Stone Age.
The Kelti were a very cultured human mass to which Europe owes a great
deal. They were the ones who christened all the great rivers and mountains
of that continent, who designated the places of the future great cities, and
planned the first network of communication. They were the first Europeans.
Had History given them another hundred years they would have formed a
great unitary nation centered around Gallia and Hungary. But this century
had not been granted to them.
The holocaust of the Celts in Gallia was perpetrated by Julius Caesar and his
legions in the first century BC.
Short Biographies
Professor Lszl Marcz was born in Utrecht in 1960.
His parents left Hungary at the time of the 1956 Hungarian revolution. He completed his
studies at the University of Groningen in Hungarian and general linguistics. In 1980 he
translated Ferenc Sntas novel The Fifth Seal into Dutch. He attained his qualifications in
general linguistics in 1984.
He worked as scientific assistant at the University of Groningens at the department general
linguistic from 1984 to 1990. He defended a thesis concerning the Magyar language
structure under the title Asymmetries in Hungarian doctoral dissertation in 1989.
The study centered on the generative-structuralist analysis of the syntax of the Magyar
language. He engaged in free research from 1991-1992 within the framework of the Niels
Stensen Foundation. He was a guest-researcher at the MIT in Boston. He held lectures at
eight American universities concerning his doctoral dissertation. He is working at the
Amsterdam Universitys Institute of Eastern-Europe from 1992 as Associate Professor of
the program of Magyar studies.
His book Hungarian Revival, Political Reflections on Central Europe raises several
important questions concerning problems of Hungarian survival. He received a permanent
post at the University of Amsterdam.
Professor Tibor E. Barth was born in Alslendva Hungary in 1906. He received his Ph.
D. in History in Budapest, and continued his postgraduate studies in Vienna, Paris and
Montreal. He was professor of history at the University of Kolozsvr, Hungary (1940-45).
He was Secretary of the Hungarian Institute in Paris (1932-39) and fulfilled the role of
Assistant-Secretary of the International Committee of Historical Sciences at the same time.

He moved to Paris with his family in 1945 where he founded a Hungarian newspaper. He
left Paris for Montreal, Canada in 1952.
He continued his research on ancient Hungarian history and was author of over one
hundred historical essays and several books.
Atl Antis, in the Amerindian language, means 'Old Andes' - namely, the Andes before they
were elevated - by interplanetary cataclysms - "on the night of the falling stars!"
The most ancient register of Hungarian-Magyar origins begins with Nimrud, King of Zmr
(Sumeria) and his two sons, Hunor and Magor, who married an Eskitus (Scythian) princess
called Dul.
The secret of who built the Stonehenge megalithic stone circle is found in its Magyar name
Isten Henger, meaning Circle, or Cylinder, of God. The Magyar tribe involved was the Kazi,
or Cassi, the same that centuries later sent the veteran roman legions fleeing back across
the English Channel after their first invasion of the British Isles (Albion) in 55 BC.
For readers and students of Magyar the following table was kindly contributed by
Zsombor Kaali Nagy:
Return to The Metal Library and

The Cueva de Los Tayos

Magyars, Moricz and Mother Languages

Загружено:

Сведения о документе

Исходное описание:

Авторское право

Доступные форматы

Поделиться этим документом

Поделиться или встроить документ

Параметры публикации

Этот документ был вам полезен?

Это неприемлемый материал?

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

Magyars, Moricz and Mother Languages

Загружено:

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

Magyars, Moricz and Mother Language

from GoldLybrary Website

"When the contents of the Metal Library are

http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/arqueologia/cueva_tayos03.htm (1 de 18)22/08/2014 14:31:57