Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
H. M. Hassanin S. A. Mahmoud
Ministry of Electricity & Energy
S. El-Debeiky
Ain Shams University
177
178
179
Pgen
(MW)
440
415.4
Qgen
(MVA)
at base
case
227.3
315
Vsch
(p.u.)
base
case
1.015
441
525
240.7
330
1.015
442
525
240.7
330
443
525
240.7
530
600
531
600
624
625
Vsch
(p.u.)
New
Qgen
(MVA)
New
1.04
294.8
1.04
306.1
1.015
1.04
306.1
330
1.015
1.04
306.1
326
400
0.95
0.98
359.4
326
400
0.95
0.98
359.4
330
127.1
200
1.03
140.9
330
127.1
200
1.03
140.9
Qmax
MVA)
Voltage (pu)
Actual
Tap
0.914
0.916
0.969
0.920
0.935
0.938
0.917
0.918
0.907
1.001
0.957
0.962
0.944
0.957
0.977
Case
1
0.944
0.937
0.985
0.936
0.946
0.954
0.939
0.933
0.920
1.005
0.965
0.970
0.954
0.968
0.989
Case 2
0.925
0.929
0.983
0.929
0.942
0.947
0.930
0.926
0.914
1.003
0.963
0.968
0.951
0.963
0.988
Case
3
0.922
0.925
0.983
0.923
0.939
0.944
0.925
0.924
0.912
1.002
0.957
0.962
0.943
0.961
0.987
Case 4
0.915
0.916
0.988
0.919
0.935
0.938
0.917
0.917
0.906
1.000
0.956
0.962
0.943
0.957
0.988
Case
5
0.920
0.921
0.983
0.924
0.940
0.944
0.922
0.924
0.912
1.003
0.960
0.965
0.947
0.963
0.988
180
Voltage (pu)
Change Vsch, change tap
Base Case
ratio and add reactive power
306
0.944
1.048
320
0.957
1.020
950
0.977
1.021
Figure (7) illustrates the voltage levels on the 500 K.V. nodes
after changing Vsch. , changing tap ratio and adding 950
MVAR.
Table (9): The voltage levels on the 500 K.V. nodes in case of
tripping one circuit 500 K.V. T.L with and without remedial
actions.
Voltage (pu)
Trip of one ct.
Normal condition
Bus
(B#293)(B#292)
No.
without
with
without
with
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial Remedial
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
30
0.914
0.997
0.907
0.990
180
0.916
0.993
0.911
0.987
192
0.969
1.029
0.968
1.027
229
0.920
0.990
0.914
0.984
233
0.935
0.997
0.928
0.990
235
0.938
1.029
0.900
0.996
238
0.917
0.993
0.911
0.987
291
0.918
1.022
0.858
0.969
292
0.907
1.026
0.816
0.942
293
1.001
1.050
0.990
1.028
303
0.957
1.023
0.956
1.019
305
0.962
1.028
0.961
1.025
306
0.944
1.048
0.945
1.044
320
0.957
1.020
0.947
1.011
950
0.977
1.021
0.977
1.020
Bus No.
181
Base Case
804
915
917
5038
5039
5040
5042
5043
5044
5045
5046
5047
5049
without
remedial
actions
0.832
0.802
0.822
0.867
0.869
0.909
0.829
0.819
0.838
0.808
0.821
0.841
0.804
with
remedial
actions
0.977
0.988
0.988
0.950
0.958
1.011
0.963
0.966
0.991
0.983
0.996
0.952
0.966
without
remedial
actions
0.801
0.790
0.810
0.837
0.837
0.872
0.791
0.781
0.801
0.768
0.783
0.807
0.766
5051
5052
5053
5062
5070
0.826
0.852
0.852
0.841
0.862
0.980
0.954
0.952
0.995
0.981
0.794
0.818
0.818
0.805
0.825
with remedial
actions
0.970
0.985
0.985
0.943
0.952
1.005
0.955
0.957
0.982
0.972
0.986
0.943
0.956
0.972
0.946
0.944
0.985
0.975
182
Figure (1): Single Line Diagram of The Network Parts Under Study
Reference Number: JO-0002
183
Figure (2): The voltage profile in case of outage of one circuit of 500 K.V. line
on the 500 K.V. nodes for different cases.
Figure (4): The voltage profile in case of changing V sch. at a certain generation units
of the ENPS on the 500 K.V. nodes
184
Figure(5): The voltage profile in case of changing the tap ratio of certain 500/220 K.V. transformers
on the 500 K.V. nodes for different cases.
Figure(6): The voltage levels on the 500 K.V. nodes after improving the power factor from 0.85 to 0.92
Figure(7): The voltage levels on the 500 K.V. nodes after changing V sch & changing
tap ratio and adding 950 MVAR
185
Figure(8): The voltage levels on the 500 K.V. in case of tripping one circuit 500 K.V. T.L with
and without remedial actions.
Figure (9): The voltage levels on the 220 K.V. in case of tripping generation unit of 625 MW at bus GN.KURIM(B#530) with
and without the remedial actions.
186
REFERNCES
[1] Carson W. Taylor "Power System Voltage Stability" The
EPRI Power System Engineering Series, Bonneville
Power Administration ,1994.
[2] Benabid R. and boudour M." Optimal Location and Size
of SVC and TCSC for Multi-Objective Static Voltage
Stability Enhancement" Nuclear Center Research of
Birine .
[3] Annual Report " Egyptian Electricity Holding Company
"Ministry of Electricity and Energy 2008-2009.
[4] Zhihong Jia and Jeyasurya B., "Contingency Ranking for
On-Line
Voltage
Stability Assessment"
IEEE
Transactions on Power Systems, Vol. 15, No. 3, August
2000.
[5] Claudio Caizares, William Rosehart, Alberto Berizzi,
Cristian Bovo "Comparison of Voltage Security
Constrained Optimal Power Flow Techniques " IEEE
PES Summer Meeting, Vancouver, BC, July 2001.
[6] http//www.ee.washington.edu/research/
pstca/pf30/pg _tca30bus.htm
[7] http//www.ee.iastate.edu/~jdm/EE457/PSSE_Fault_
Intro_Instructions.doc
[8] Stefan Johansson & Fredrik Sjgren "Voltage collapse in
power systems The Influence of generator current limiter,
on-load tap-changers and load dynamics" Chalmers
University of Technology 1995.
[9] I. Dobson, T. Van Cutsem, C. Vournas, C.L. DeMarco,
M. Venkatasubramanian, T. Overbye, C.A. Canizares
"Voltage Stability Assessment Concepts, Practices and
Tools "IEEE Power Engineering Society Power System
Stability Subcommittee Special Publication IEEE product
number SP101PS August 2002.
[10] S.G. Seifossadat1, M. Saniei1, A. Raeszadeh and Shahid
Chamran "Reactive Power Pricing in Competitive
Electric Markets Using a Sequential Linear Programming
with Considered Investment Cost of Capacitor Banks.
International Journal of Innovations in Energy Systems
and Power (Vol.4, no.1, April 2009) Page 29 of 43.
187