Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Masafumi YOHDA
1
Tokyo University of
Agriculture and Technology
MYSTERIES IN PCR
Authors
polymerase by himself?
Roche?
2
KARY MULLIS
1962 Georgia Tech, Department of Chemical Engineering
Interest in Physics (including cosmology)
1966 UC Berkeley, Doctoral program in biochemistry
1968 Submit an article The Cosmological Significance of Time Reversal to Nature.
It was finally accepted after two rejections.
Ph.D. Structure and Organic Synthesis of Microbial Iron Transport Agents
1972-1975 Worked for a pediatric cardiology laboratory
1975-1977 Manager of a local restaurant and coffee shop.
1977 Started to work with Tom White of UCSF, DNA synthesis
1979 Tom White joined Cetus.
Tom White was appointed as a head of the Recombinant Molecular Research department.
He appointed Mullis as head a head of the DNA synthesis lab.
Development of DNA synthesizer. Mullis was active in suggesting improvement
1983 First presentation on the concept of PCR at the regular Cetus seminar
1984 Cetus scientific meeting.
Mullis presented a poster showing amplification of a beta globin gene.
However, the poster was generally ignored.
He scraped with colleagues, and was excluded from DNA synthesis group.
He could concentrate on development of PCR.
1993 Novel Prize in Chemistry
4
INCREASE OF BIO-PHARMACEUTICALS
2010
Ratio
2011
Ratio
2012
Ratio
Bio
70,832
31.6%
78,301
34.0%
84.327
39.3%
Small
molecule
153.307
68.4%
151.961
66.0%
130,394
60.7%
Total
224,139
230,262
214.721
2012
Decrease
Lipidor
5,028
-5,832
Plavix
5,277
-4,452
Seroquel
3,135
-3,052
Zyprexa
1,734
-2,962
Lecsapro
1,380
-2,593
Actos
1,521
-2,486
18,075
-21,377
Total
10
2008
Norvacs (Pfizer)
2010
Lipidor (Phizer)
2009
Takepron (Takeda)
2011
Actos (Takeda)
2012
Blopres (Takeda)
2010
Aricept (Eisai)
2010
Pariet Eisai)
2008 -2011 Harnal, Prograf (Astellas)
12
Bio-Pharmaceuticals
It is difficult to produce Bio-Pharmaceuticals
with the same quality by Generic Maker.
Molecular Target Drugs
Small Molecule: Glivec
Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia (CML)
Bio-Pharmacetuticals: Antibody
Taylormade Drugs
Based on the genomic information,
appropriate drugs will be selected to each
patient.
14
Drug-metabolizing
enzymes
Blood
target cell
Drug
Receptor
metabolize
signal
transduction
Response
excretion
Blood
Drug
excretion
EM
Drug
excretion
PM
extensive metabolizer
intermediate metabolizer
poor metabolizer
exon 4
*1Wild type
*2
exon 5
SUCCESS OF AMGEN
- EPO & G-CSF -
EPO
G-CSF
17
18
EPO
19
Dialysis
Renal Failure
EPO
Increase of erythrocyte
Improvement of QOL
20
Ile
ss
160
Thr
Tyr
150
Leu
Asn
Phe
Val
130
Thr Asp Ala Thr
Ala Trp Lys Arg Met Glu Val Gly Gln Gln Ala Val Glu
120
Gly
Leu
Ala
70
80
Ile Thr Arg Leu Pro Ala Ala Ser Ala Ala
Ile Ser
Asp
Pro
Pro
Leu
30
Glu
Ala
His
60
Lys
Phe
50
Tyr
Leu Phe Arg Val Tyr Ser Asn Phe Leu Arg Gly Lys Leu Lys
Arg
Ile
40
140
20
10
Cys Asp Ser Arg Val Leu Glu Arg Tyr
Val
Trp
Gln
Ala Gln Gly Arg Leu Val Ala Glu Ser Leu Leu Ala Leu Gly
Leu
Val
90
Pro
Leu
100
Arg Leu Leu Thr Thr Leu Ser Arg Leu Gly Ser Val Ala Lys Asp Val His Leu
Gln
: Disulfide bond
21
22
PRODUCTION OF EPO
Culture
Purification
Bulk Drug
Preparation
Filling
23
Packaging
Product
24
Roller Bottle
25
26
PURIFICATION SYSTEM
27
28
Cancer
Patient
G-CSF
Increase of
white blood cells
Recovery of Immune system
Increase of survival ratio
29
RECOMBINANT G-CSF
30
31
32
33
34
35
ADRENERGIC RECEPTORS
36
37
40
42
44
45
46
47
48
ANOTHER APPROACH
- ANTIBODY DRUG
PRESCRIPTION OF HERCEPTIN
50
STRUCTURE OF ANTIBODY
51
HUMANIZED ANTIBODY
52
ADVANCEMENT OF ANTIBODY
PRODUCTION
53
54
Masafumi YOHDA
ACRYLAMIDE
Industrially important material
Used for production of polymer coagulant, waste
water treatment reagent, soil modifier, paper
strengthening agent, paint, resin et al.
Produced from acrylnitrile
H
H
C C
H
CN
Acrylnitrile
H2O
H
H
C C
H
CONH2
Acrylamide
Cupper Catalyst
Method
Acrylnitrile
H2 O
Hydrolysis
Catalyst
Preparatio
n
Removal
of catalyst
Concentration
Removal
of Cu ion
Acrylamide
Unreacted AN
Bio-Catalyst
Method
Acrylnitrile
H2O
Removal
of catalyst
Hydrolysis
Acrylamide
Acrylnitrile
H2 O
Acrylamide
2
1
0
Raw
Materials
Steam
Electric
Power
Catalytic
Process
Enzymatic
Old-Process
Enzymatic
New-Process
SCREENING MICROBES TO
PRODUCE ACRYLAMINDE
Nitrilase
R-CO2H
R-CN
Nitrile hydratase
R-CONH2
NH3
Amidase
Activity
Measuremen
t
Inoculatio
n
Soil Sample
Subcultur
e
Subculture
Plate
3rd Generation
Rhodococcus rhodochrous J1
2nd Generation
Pseudomonas chlororaphis B23
1st Generation
Rhodococcus sp.N-774
AA production by
Sulfuric acid catalyst
Nitto Chem. Co.
1957
1974
A.A. production by
Bio-plants
Nitto Chem. Co.
1985
N774
4,000/year
1985
B23
6,000/year
1988
Pseudomonas
chlororaphis
B23
Rhodococcus
rhodochrous
J1
Enzyme type
Fe
Fe
Co
27
40
50
vl*
bd*
bd*
Acrylamide productivity(g/g-cells)
500
850
>7000
20
27
40
Rhodococcus
rhodochrous J1
3-Cyanopyridine
Adiponitrile
Nicotineamide
Pseudomonas
chlororaphis B23
5-cyanovaleramide
PRODUCTION OF NICTINEAMIDE
BY NITRILE HYDRATASE
0 :
J1
1 :
6 :
18:
Reaction intermediates
Product (Acrylamide)
Product (acrylamide)
50
45
40
BioNHase
process
Chemical catalyst
Copper
catalyst
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05
Year
DISCOVERY OF PHOTOACTIVATION
NHase activity of Rhodococcus sp.N771 and N774
varies with cultivation conditions.
Small Scale
High Activity
Large Scale
Low Activity
PHOTOACTIVATION OF NHASE
50
Light Activation
40
30
20
10
0
0
Dark Inactivation
10
20
30
Time [h]
40
50
Photoreactivity of NHase is
Regulated by NO
hu
NO
b NO a
Fe
RCN
H2 O
RCONH2
a
Fe
Inactive NHase
(Nitrosylated)
dark
NO
Active NHase
A: Natural
B: N15 Label
Activity [U/mg]
1844
0.002
A. Inactive form
6.5
h
B. Active form
831
NO
NO
D. Active NO
Light
718
C. Active
h
1900
1880
1860
1840
Wavenumber
1820 1800
(cm-1)
REGULATION OF NHASE BY NO
hu
hu
NO
b NO a
Fe
RCN
H2 O
RCONH2
a
Fe
Dark
Inactive
NO Bound Form
NO
Active
Without NO
PHOTOREACTIVITY IS INDEPENDENT
OF 3D STRUCTURE
ISOLATION OF PHOTOREACTIVE
SUBUNIT
PHOTOREACTIVE PROTEASE
DIGESTED FRAGMENT
MASS SPECTROMETRY OF
PHOTOREACTIVE PEPTIDE
MODIFICATION OF CYS TO
CYSTEINE SULFINIC ACID
OH2
R-CN
Nitriles
R-CO-NH2
Amides
Arg56
NO
Active Center
Arg141
Cys112
subunit
Nitrosylated form
(inactive)
Fe
Cysteine sulfenic
acid
Cys114-SOH 2 main chain amide
notrogen as
coordinated.
FeIII
Amido
nitoroge
n
Cys109-SH
Cysteine sulfinic
acid
Oxygen
Carbon Cys112-SO2H
Nitrogen
293K
293K
293K
293K
95K
293K
Flash-Cooling
0 min
0 min
X min
18
min
NO
tert-butylisonitrile
(tBuNC)
120 min
440 min
> 440
min
120 MIN
FeBrown
N Blue
S Green
C Yellow
O Red
440 MIN
FeBrown
N Blue
S Green
C Yellow
O Red
Hydrolysis intermediate of
tBuNH2
DOGMA OF ANFINSEN
Christian B. Anfinsen
Anfinsens Experiment
Heat
Raw Egg
Cool, but
irreversible
DISEASE OF PROTEIN
-IF IT IS ISOLATED, OK. BUT ---
Denature
Aggregation
Renature
Boiled Egg
Alzheimers Disease
Parkinsons Disease
Poly-Glutamine Disease
Huntingtons Disease
Prion Disease
ALZHEIMERS DISEASE
AMYLOID PLAQUES
FORMATION OF AMYLOID
POLYGLUTAMINE DISEASE
POLYGLUTAMINE DISEASES
Huntingtin
PRION DISEASES
DISEASE OF PROTEIN
-RESCUE BY CHAPERONEDenature
Isolation
Cure
By Chaperone
Chaperones
CHAPERONIN
GroES Heptamer
GroEL-ES Coplex
Chaperones
LIFE OF PROTEINS
Prokaryotic
Proteins
Eukaryotic
Proteins
Function
10kDa
GroES
Hsp10
Co-factor of
GroEL/Hsp60
20 kDa 30kDa
sHsps
HspB group
proteins, Hsp27
40kDa
DanJ
Hsp40
Co-factor of Hsp40
60kDa
GroEL
Hsp60
Protein folding
DanK
Protein folding or
preventing protein
folding
70 kDa
90kDa
HtpG
Hsp90, Grp94
Maintenance steroid
receptors, protein
Kinases
100kDa
ClpA, B, X
Hsp104, Hsp110
Protein degradation,
disaggregation
STRUCTURE OF GROELS
Several nm
Group II chaperonins
GroES
ATP
binding
ATP
hydrolysis
GroEL
ATP
binding
?
ATP
hydrolysis
How does it work without co-chaperonin ?
Helical
protrusion
Non-native
polypeptide
ATP
H
A
I
E
Nucleotidefree form
ATP-bound
form
Pi
ADP-bound
form
Tracer: nanocrystal
Diffracted X-ray Tracking
nanocrystal
protein
120
X-rays
Laue spot
moves
gold nanocrystal
(20-50 nm)
protein
Structural
Change
Features:
1. High accuracy(m rad, pico meter level)
2. Time-resolved information (ms to s)
3. Independent from chemical conditions
4. Applied to in vivo measurement
Au
Tilting
White
X-ray
White
X-ray
Resolution of DXT
direction = 1 mrad (0.057)
INSTRUMENTATION OF DXT
D263C
Image
Intensifier
Chaperonin
KS-1
(D263C/C366S)
Sample
V7739P (Hamamatsu
Photonics)
Thermococcus chaperonin
polyimide film
polyimide film
aqueous
gold
solution
White Xray
heater
X-rays
gold nano
crystal
protein
50 m
CCD:
C4880-80(Hamamatsu
photonics)
Sample
PF-AR NW14A
(35-60mA)
2=
0.2rad
60 , 2mM ATP
MEAN-SQUARE DISPLACEMENT
25
20
15
140
120
MSD
(mrad2)
100
MSD
(mrad2)
80
60
10
40
5
2
0
0
100
200
time (ms)
300
400
100
200
time (ms)
300
400
UV
irradiation
caged ATP
(inactive ATP)
ATP
transparent teflon
film
gold
X-rays
UV-triggered DXT :
To confirm the twisting direction of
chaperonins ring when ATP binds to
the ring
Au-crystal
protein
Laser
355nm
70 m thick
Angular displacement
129