Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
XX INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON
"MATERIAL HANDLING, CONSTRUCTIONS
AND LOGISTICS"
Edited by
S. Bonjak, G. Kartnig and N. Zrni
MHCL12
UNIVERSITY OF BELGRADE
FACULTY OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
Scientific Committee
Mircea Alamoreanu, Romania
Marijonas Bogdevicius, Lithuania
Sran Bonjak, Serbia
Juray Bukoveczki, Bratislava, Slovakia
Dumitru Caruntu, USA
Marco Ceccarelli, Italy
I-Ming Chen, Singapore
Thomas Chondros, Greece
Jerzy Czmochowski, Poland
Nenad upri, Serbia
Argiris Dentsoras, Greece
Gamini Dissanayake, Australia
Branislav Dragovi, Montenegro
Milomir Gai, Serbia
Marin Georgiev, Bulgaria
Milosav Georgijevi, Serbia
Monika Hardygora, Poland
Klaus Hoffmann, Austria
Leopold Hrabovsky, Czech Republic
Bela Illes, Hungary
Nenad Ivanievi, Serbia
Janko Janevski, Republic of Macedonia
Boris Jerman, Slovenia
Dirk Jodin, Austria
Miomir Jovanovi, Serbia
Franz Kessler, Austria
Teun Koetsier, Netherlands
5.
6.
7.
8.
Reviewers:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Publisher:
University of Belgrade, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering
CIRCULATION: 150 copies
ISBN 978-86-7083-763-8
All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form or by any means without writing permission from publisher.
II
PREFACE
The International Conference on Material Handling, Constructions and Logistics MHCL is the 20th event of a series
that has been started just 36 years ago, in 1976 by Professor ore Zrni. Up to now the Conference gathered together
scientists and researchers from all republics (now independent states) of former Yugoslavia (Serbia, Montenegro,
Croatia, Slovenia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, and Republic of Macedonia), as well as from Austria, Germany, Hungary,
Poland, Slovakia, Bulgaria, Romania, China, Greece, Russia, Netherlands, Italy, Switzerland, Lithuania, South Korea,
USA and Australia, working in the field of Material and Mechanical Handling, Constructions and Construction
Machinery, as well as Transport Logistics. This year, for the first time, MHCL is organized together by the University
of Belgrade (Faculty of Mechanical Engineering) and Vienna University of Technology (Institute for Engineering
Design and Logistics Engineering).
The aim of the Conference is to be a forum to exchange views, opinions and experience on MHCL from technical
viewpoints in order to track the current achievements, but also to look at to future developments. Most of the authors of
contributed papers are experts in MHCL and related topics. Also, one of the main goals of the Conference is to make
the scientific/research exchange between similar academic Departments and Institutes from different countries, as well
as individual researcher in the field, in order for possible cooperation in applying for international programs or bilateral
research and scientific projects.
This year the International Conference MHCL12 is held at the University of Belgrade, Faculty of Mechanical
Engineering, from 3-5 October. These Proceedings contain 69 papers by authors from 22 countries: Serbia, Austria,
Germany, Poland, Greece, Montenegro, Slovenia, South Korea, Netherlands, Macedonia, China, Czech Republic, Italy,
Hungary, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Kenya, Ukraine, Australia, Canada, Indonesia, Mexico and USA. The papers are
grouped in four principal sessions A, B, C, D and a special session E established in 2009 and organized by Professor
Branislav Dragovi (University of Montenegro):
Session A: Hoisting and Conveying Equipment and Technologies (Chairman: Prof. Nenad Zrnic): 11 papers
Session B: Construction and Mining Equipment and Technologies (Chairman: Prof. Sran Bonjak): 14 papers
Session C: Logistics and Intralogistics Systems (Co-chairmen: Profs. Georg Kartnig and Nenad Zrnic): 16 papers
Session D: Constructions and Design Engineering (Co-chairmen: Profs. Georg Kartnig and Sran Bonjak): 8 papers
Session E: Maritime and Port Logistics (Chairman: Prof. Branislav Dragovi): 13 papers
Proceedings contain also 7 invited papers presented in Plenary and Closing session. The invited lectures reflect the wide
spectrum of important topics of current interest in MHCL. These Proceedings can also be considered as a kind of
handbook on MHCL, and can be of interest for researchers, graduate students and engineers specializing or addressing
attention to MHCL. We believe that a reader will take advantage of the papers in these Proceedings with further
satisfaction and motivation for her or his work.
We would like to express our sincere thanks to all members of the Scientific and Organizing Committee, reviewers as
well as to all participants including invited speakers for coming in Belgrade to present their papers. On this occasion,
we are particularly indebted to all people who rendered their help for the preparation of the Conference and publication
of the Proceedings.
We are grateful to the authors of the articles for their valuable contributions and for preparing their manuscripts in time.
III
SPONSORED BY
IV
CONTENTS
PLENARY SESSION INVITED PAPERS
Overmeyer L, Frobse T, Radosavac M.
TRENDS AND EXPERIENCES OF TESTING THE FATIGUE STRENGTH OF MORE THAN 1,000
CONVEYOR BELT SPLICES ..................................................................................................................................... 1
Schmidt T, Anders M, Leonhardt T, Siegel A.
ADVANCES IN ROPE DRIVES ................................................................................................................................. 7
Hoffmann K.
ROPEWAYS FROM THEIR ORIGINS UP TO THE 3RD MILLENNIUM ............................................................ 13
Kessler F, Prenner M.
INVESTIGATION INTO BULK MATERIAL PARAMETERS FOR DISCRETE ELEMENT SIMULATION ..... 25
Rusiski E, Czmochowski J, Pietrusiak D.
SELECTED PROBLEMS OF OPEN CAST MINING MACHINES DESIGN ......................................................... 39
Nikitakos N.
GREEN LOGISTICS - THE CONCEPT OF ZERO EMISSIONS PORT ................................................................. 51
VI
VII
VIII
IX
PLENARY SESSION
Tobias Frobse
Research Associate
Leibniz Universitt Hannover
Institute of Transport and
Automation Technology
Miel Radosavac
Research Associate
Leibniz Universitt Hannover
Institute of Transport and
Automation Technology
The demand of a higher mass flow and longer distances is pushing the development of high-strength conveyor belts continuously forward. The development of the belt splice is advancing simultaneously to the progress of
the belt, because this represents the weakest point of the whole conveyor
belt system. Since more than thirty years the Institute of Transport and Automation Technology examines belt splices on their dynamic fatigue
strength according to DIN 22110-3. To be able to keep up with industrial
developments, the institute added to its existing two test rigs one newly designed test rig for the investigation of steel cord belts with nominal
strength of more than 7,800 N/mm. Including the new test rig, there have
been tested around 1,000 conveyor belt specimen for industrial projects.
Within those tests it is clearly stated that in the area of conveyor belt splices the relative fatigue strength is also increasing. This is of great economic
relevance, because of the increase in splice strength, the conveying distance and the mass flow can be raised, at the same time as the conveyor
belt size can stay the same.
Keywords: Conveyor Belt Splice, Fatigue Strength, Test Rig
1. INTRODUCTION
Under technological and economical aspects, conveyor belts have proved themselves for conveying bulk
material. Some conveying systems provide mass flow
rates of up to 40,000 tons per hour. In addition to that,
conveying systems with up to 12 MW have been built.
For such high requirements, high-tensile steel cord conveyor belts are used for the conveying task. From the
investment point of view and the technological design
of the whole conveyor system, the conveyor belt represents the most essential part. Therefore, the Institute of
Transport and Automation Technology (ITA), still has a
research focus in the field of conveyor belts and their
associated elements.
Conveyor belts are spliced to form a continuous belt
on the conveying system site. Due to restrictions of
transportation weight and geometrical dimensions, the
conveyor belt often is shipped in several subsections of
some hundred meters length. Hence, the conveyor belt
has at least one, often several belt splices. These belt
splices represent the weakest point in the whole conveyor belt, because within the belt splice the tension
member is interrupted. Therefore, the tensile strain has
to be transmitted through the intermediate rubber. Figure 1 shows examples for basic types of conveyor belt
splices.
The strength of a conveyor belt splice depends on
several aspects. Particularly important are the applied
splice layout and the used material. Especially in the
field of steel cord conveyor belts, the individual case for
the splice has to be adapted from many different layouts.
Figure 4. Example for the test results with a series five belt
specimens
In 1974, the application of self-extinguishing conveyor belts for underground hard coal mining has been
prescribed. Therefore, the former Institut fr
Frdertechnik Hannover (IFH) received in cooperation
with belt manufacturers the task to test and improve the
corresponding conveyor belt splices.
A standardized method to predict the dynamical fatigue strength of conveyor belt splices did not exist at
that time. As consequence a test method including a test
rig (see figure 5) was developed. For the first time a
saw-tooth shaped test force could realistically be applied on a rotating conveyor belt.
300 kNRevolution
Test Rig
1,000 kNRevolution
Test Rig
800 mm
1,250 mm
1,000 mm
1,500 mm
2 x 300 kN
2 x 1000 kN
2 x 3,500 kN
6,000 mm to
8,000 mm
6,500 mm
12,000 mm
Pulley
width
1,000 mm
1,000 mm
1,000 mm
Maximum
cylinder
stroke
1,000 mm
1,000 mm
1,000 mm
Pulley
diameter
Maximum
test force
Axle
distance
3,500 kNRevolution
Test Rig
2,500 mm
Upon the start-up of the new test rig, the control system was also renewed for all test rigs. Before the renewal, only results about the successfully completed
cycles were possible. With the changeover, it is possible
to examine the test process in more detail. One advantage is the information about the change of the elongation as a function of the number of performed load
cylces. Additional information focuses on the kind of
splice break. A differentiation can be made between
abrupt or steady-going failure. As a matter of course, all
occurred forces are logged simultaneously. During the
test, both clamping cylinders apply the required test
force on average. As extended information now, the
effective difference between the left and the right cylinder can be compared (figure 7).
By continuous improvement of the presented analysis methods, ITA supports ongoing customers to develop and evolve their conveyor belts. Current research
focuses on a combination of data acquisition and simultaneous video analysis of the tests for more detailed
information about the failure mode.
(1)
Thereby S0 represents the factor of safety of the conveyor belt to consider the manufacturing conditions
(1.1 S0 1.2). S1 represents the factor of safety of the
conveyor belt to consider lifespan and work load
(1.5 S1 1.9). In case of discrepancy between kk,max
and k the norm shows further calculation rules.
5. CONCLUSION
[1] Flebbe,
H.:
Prfung
der
dynamischen
Beanspruchbarkeit von Frdergurtverbindungen,
Dissertation Universitt Hannover, 1984.
[2] DIN
22110-3:
Prfverfahren
fr
Frdergurtverbindungen - Teil 3: Ermittlung der
Zeitfestigkeit
von
Frdergurtverbindungen
(Dynamisches Prfverfahren), Normenausschuss
Bergbau (FABERG) within the DIN Deutsches
Institut fr Normung e.V. and Normenausschuss
Maschinenbau (NAM) within the DIN, Berlin:
Beuth, February 2007.
[3] Hager, M.: Stand der Entwicklung von
Verbindungen
hochfester
Stahlseilgurte,
Braunkohle, Vol. 39, No. 7, pp. 251-253, 1987.
[4] Overmeyer, L., Falkenberg, S., Frobse, T.: Neue
Dimensionen im Bereich der dynamischen Prfung
von
Stahlseilfrdergurten,
15.
Fachtagung
Schttgutfrdertechnik 2010 Neue Trends und
Technologien Vol. 15: Lehrstuhl fr Frdertechnik
Materialfluss Logistik (fml), 2010.
[5] DIN 22101: Stetigfrderer Gurtfrderer fr
Schttgter Grundlagen fr die Berechnung und
Auslegung. Normenausschuss Bergbau (FABERG)
within the DIN Deutsches Institut fr Normung
e.V. and Normenausschuss Maschinenbau (NAM)
within the DIN, Berlin: Beuth, December 2011.
Martin Anders
Thomas Leonhardt
Armin Siegel
Research Assistants
Technische Universitt Dresden
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering
Institute of Material Handling
and Industrial Engineering
The cost for raw materials and energy is a significant factor in most
material handling systems. Current research on magnetic traction sheaves
with higher and dynamic driving capacity conduce to an efficient use of
resources and to improve the performance of rope drives. The new traction
behaviour of these sheaves leads to a significand reduction of inertia in lift
car and counterweight in hoisting devices at a constant loading capacity.
Simultaneously the required energy is also being reduced for such a
driving system because of the lower total mass to be accelerated.
Furthergoing research is establishing new possebilities in different
applications. In nearly every case a realization of ligthweight constructed
components can be made possible. Thus, a contribution to the
implementation of sustainability in material handling is provided.
Keywords: wire rope, traction sheave, magnet, elevator, winch, cranes.
1. INTRODUCTION
(1)
V-groove
round groove
with undercut
round groove
1
2
(2)
1
2
(3)
F1/F2
5
conventional
traction sheave
Payload
Q = 2500 kg
Cabin
2400 kg
Counterweight
3700 kg
2095 kg
V-groove, = 45
undercut round
groove, < 75
Coeff. of friction
f() = 0,235
f() = 0,15
Rope diameter
No. of ropes
additional safety
against slipping
Inertia saving
0,2
0,4
0,6
0,8
800 kg
13 N/mm
2
Cabin acc.
0,0
magnetic traction
sheave
System
Groove
conventional
magnetic traction sheave
a = 1,5 m/s
13 mm
5
5 (4 possible)
1,2
3200 kg
1,0
F2/F2max
F1
MTS
F2
F2
MTS
Figure 8. reducing deflection angle using MTS
10
F1
efficiency
1,00
0,98
0,96
0,94
0,92
rope 1
rope 2
rope 3
rope 4
0,90
0,88
0,86
0,84
0,82
0,80
0
0,5
1,5
2,5
3,5 4 4,5
load in kN
11
AiF-IGF project:
Energiebilanz bei Magnettreibscheiben
SAB-EFRE-project:
Prfstand fr innovative Magnetseilwinden MAGWIN
REFERENCES
APPENDIX
12
a
CTS
d
D
F1/2
M
MTS
Q
qm
1. INTRODUCTION
13
14
3. ROPEWAYS
Figure 8. Cross section of the "Albert rope", diameter
18mm, zZ 3 4 3.5mm [10]
15
16
17
18
in Barcelona,
Aerial Ropeways
While initially after the invention of the steel cable
in 1834 development mainly was focused on funicular
railways such as the Cable Car San Francisco, later
interest turned to aerial ropeways. At first aerial
ropeways were mainly used to transport freight,
especially in the mining industry. As Figure 1 explains,
there are two main types of aerial ropeway:
role
in
the
Predigtstuhlbahn
in
Bad
New technologies
Modern aerial ropeways can be broken down into
monocable and bicable systems (see Fig. 1, above). The
main difference between the two is simply the number
of rope systems. In the case of a monocable ropeway
one or two ropes assume the carrying and hauling
functions (carry-hauling cable), whereas with a bicable
system the gondolas are carried by one or more ropes
(track ropes) and propelled by a different rope system
(haul rope). Both types are equipped with releasable
clamping devices. At the stations, the cabins are
disconnected from the haul rope, decelerated and guided
on to a separate rail which leads the cars through the
embarkation and disembarkation areas at low speed.
Before leaving the station the cabins are accelerated
again up to the constant haul rope speed, and clamped
on to the haul rope.
Monocable, continuous movement aerial ropeways
are widely used in mountainous areas. Figure 39 shows
a cable car at Austrias Kitzsteinhorn ski resort.
The fact that the two cables are relatively far apart
means that the system is very stable in windy
conditions, and it is therefore ideal for high mountains.
An example of a Funitel ropeway is shown in Figure 41.
22
4. CONCLUSIONS
23
[7] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Repslagarbanan_1Karlskrona.JPG
[8] Fontana D., Della Trasportatione dell Obelisco
Vaticano, Appresso Domenico Basa, Rome, 1590
[9] http://www.clausthal-zellerfeld.de/das-drahtseil/
[10] Verreet R., Das Drahtseil Die Geschichte der
Erfindung und Weiterentwicklung in Drahtwelt 6,
1985
[11] Schneigert Z., Aerial Ropeways and Funicular
Railways, Pergamon Press, Oxford, London, New
York and Paris, 1966
[12] Dieterich G., Die Erfindung der Drahtseilbahnen,
Verlag Hermann, 1908
[13] Stephan P., Die Luftseilbahnen, Verlag Julius
Springer, Leipzig, 1907
[14] Lorini B., Fnf Bcher von Festung Bauen, David
Beckern, Frankfurt am Main, 1607
[15] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monongahela_Incline
[16] Hefti W., Schienenseilbahnen in aller Welt,
Birkhuser Verlag, Basel, 1975
[17] Hoffmann K., Recent Investigations of Ropeway
Oscillations caused by Cross-Wind and other
Influences in Proceedings of the XIX International
Conference on Material Handling, Constructions
and Logistics, Belgrade,. 2009, pp. 1728
24
[18] http://www.funimag.com/funimag05/BUDA.HTM
[19] LEITNER, www.leitner-lifts.com
[20] DOPPELMAYR, www.doppelmayr.at
[21] http://www.niagaraparks.com/attractions/whirlpoolaero-car.html
[22] Hoffmann K., Liehl R., Cable-drawn urban
transport systems in Urban Transport XI, WIT
Press, Southampton, 2005, pp. 2536
[23] Neuhaus W., Wetterhornaufzug, die erste
Luftseilbahn der Schweiz, Prellbock Druck &
Verlag, Leissigen, 2007
[24] http://www.predigtstuhlbahn.de
[25] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Torre_del_cableManizales.JPG
[26] http://www.stanserhorn.ch/de/bahn/cabrio/
[27] Sayenga D., The flattened strand story, Wire Rope
News, 1986
[28] Ridge I.M.L., The development of rope,
O.I.P.E.E.C. 65, 1993
[29] Hoffmann K., Zrnic N., A Contribution on the
History of Ropeways, in Proceedings of HMM
2012, Amsterdam
Franz Kessler
Professor
University of Leoben
Chair of Conveying Technology and Design
Methods
Michael Prenner
Senior Scientist
University of Leoben
Chair of Conveying Technology and Design
Methods
1. INTRODUCTION
25
Picture 1
Picture 2
Picture 3
26
Technical Data:
Mass flow ............ 8000 t/h
Belt speed ........ 5 m/s
Bulk material ... Coal
Picture 1
Adjustable flap:
flap position 75 deg
Figure 5. Cross sections for flap position 75 deg
27
Picture 2
Picture 5
Picture 3
Picture 6
Picture 4
28
29
TEST RESULTS
Several measurements with different parameters were
made. One of the results is shown in figure 14.
30
Stack of particles
31
Constructed Particles
To get a more realistic material behaviour, constructed
particles with no particle limits could be used. A particle
should be created which can transmit a torque due to its
centre of gravity to avoid a particle behaviour like that
shown in figure 15. A simple particle could be a
tetrahedron-shaped particle made out of four spheres.
32
T = 30%
T = 45% - explosion
Figure 21. Changes of the particle forces due to the
increasing time step (T) in % of the "Rayleigh-Time Step"
T = 10%
33
34
a) Contact point of the bulk material stream (coal) on the test plate
(steel plates - material number........1.4301) at the back side of the
container
35
Figure 26. Measuring the "wall - friction" with the shear test
facility
36
Figure 28. Particle container with a seal strip and the bulk
material tray
Figure 29. "Wall - friction" difference between coarse and fine grained iron ore
37
38
Eugeniusz Rusiski
Professor
Wroclaw University of Technology, Poland
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering
Jerzy Czmochowski
Associate Professor
Wroclaw University of Technology, Poland
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering
Damian Pietrusiak
MSc
Wroclaw University of Technology, Poland
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering
1. INTRODUCTION
39
40
a)
b)
Figure 2.2 Fatigue crack on the gusset plate connected to
the beam of the bucket wheel boom on an excavator:
a) side view, b) top view
a)
b)
Figure 2.5. Part of a superstructure of a wheel excavator
made of pipes.
c)
41
42
43
44
45
m
NC
ND
C
D
2m-1
104
105
106
107
6
210
log ni
108
5
4
3
2
1
0
11 13 15 17 20 22 24 26 28 31 33 35 37 39 42 44 46 48 50 52 55 57 59 61 63
i [MPa]
Dr
i 1
ni
Ni
(1)
where:
Ni
ND
i
Ni
2 m 1
ND
i
dla i D
dla
(2)
i D
(3)
47
ni
D
N D i 1
i p 1
D
Dr
2 m 1
(4)
(5)
48
Dr Dd
49
50
Ports are key element to the supply chain and the green logistics are of
primary interest. The concept of zero emissions port is referred to a port
powered mainly from renewable energies in order to fulfill its power
requirements and to reduce the air emissions mainly using this concept for
the emerging cold ironing regulation. Several renewable energies and
their application to port operation are discussed. The concept of smart
grid is used in order to facilitate the use of several renewable energies and
to monitor and control all the demand and distribution.
Keywords: Green logistics, Air emissions, Port development, Smart grid,
Zero emissions concept.
1. INTRODUCTION
51
52
Figure 2. PV park
53
WAVES
GEOTHERMICS
CONSUMPTION
BATTERIES (NEW TYPE)
TRANPORTATION
PV
Electrical company
H2
SESSION A
HOISTING AND CONVEYING
EQUIPMENT AND TECHNOLOGIES
Georg Kartnig
Professor
Vienna University of Technology
Faculty of Mechanical and Industrial
Engineering
Institute for Engineering Design and
Logistics Engineering
Klaus Decker
Senior Scientist
Vienna University of Technology
Faculty of Mechanical and Industrial
Engineering
Institute for Engineering Design and
Logistics Engineering
Georg Havlicek
Teaching Assistent
Vienna University of Technology
Faculty of Mechanical and Industrial
Engineering
Institute for Engineering Design and
Logistics Engineering
1. INTRODUCTION
55
m r 2 m g cos( ) 0
(2)
g 2
t
2
(3)
(4)
(5)
56
(1)
(6)
(7)
(8)
2 r g[sin( 0 t ) cos( 0 t )]
g 2
t
2
(3)
(4)
57
General characteristics
Bulk density
1240 kg/m
80 m
Humidity content
0.2%
0.75
0.54
1.0
1.0
0.05
Coefficient of restitution
0.1
3.2 Simulation
Conveying velocity
v
Filling degree
1 m/s
100%
2.4 kg/s
50%
1.2 kg/s
25%
0.6 kg/s
100%
1.2 kg/s
50%
0.6 kg/s
25%
0.3 kg/s
0.5 m/s
58
59
NOMENCLATURE
4. CONCLUSIONS
Coriolis force
coefficient of restitution
E*
centrifugal force
Fnormal
Fn
Fn d
Ftangential
Ft
Ft d
g
gravity acceleration
shear modulus
force of inertia
normal force
P1
Q
pulley radius
R*
s
s1
time variable
conveying velocity
weight
Greek symbols
angle at which particle lifts from bucket
coefficient of friction
adhesion coefficient
60
Stef W. Lommen
PhD Candidate
Delft University of Technology
Faculty of Mechanical, Maritime and
Materials Engineering
Dingena L. Schott
Associate Professor
Delft University of Technology
Faculty of Mechanical, Maritime and
Materials Engineering
Gabriel Lodewijks
Professor
Delft University of Technology
Faculty of Mechanical, Maritime and
Materials Engineering
1. INTRODUCTION
Coupling
server
Forces on buckets
Motion of buckets
Figure 1. Co-simulation
(1)
r1 2r2 2r3
(2)
(3)
Fch , x Fh tan ch
(4)
Fz Fh Fc
(5)
M F r
h ch , x
Fc
ch
Fc
r3
Fch
rch,y
Fz
r1
EA
l
(8)
Tbearing n t Ft n Fn
(9)
r2
Fc
rcm,x
rch,x
62
(7)
4. VALIDATION
3
Hoisting cable
Closing cable
2.5
1.5
1
0.5
0
-0.5
-1
-1.5
-2
10
time [s]
12
14
16
18
20
3.5
x 10
Model
analytical verification
2.5
1.5
0.5
10
20
30
40
Opening angle [deg]
50
60
70
(10)
with Iwinch the inertia of the winch, Fcable the cable force
and rwinch the radius of the winch. Based on inspection
of the filtered signal and its derivative the SavitizkyGolay filter with a span of 17 (t = 0.17 s) was chosen.
Crane &
Grab
ADAMS
model
Motor
Torque
Motor
Torque
63
x 10
model
experiment
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
-0.2
-0.4
-0.6
-0.8
-1
10
time [s]
12
14
16
18
20
x 10
0.6
Torque in closing winch [Nm]
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
model
experiments
0.8
0.4
0.2
REFERENCES
0
-0.2
-0.4
-0.6
-0.8
-1
10
time [s]
12
14
16
18
20
10
x 10
experiment
model
8
6
4
2
0
10
time [s]
12
14
16
18
20
64
Gabriel Lodewijks
Prof. of Transport Engineering and Logistics
Delft University of Technology
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering
Transport Engineering and Logistics
1. INTRODUCTION
65
l
Fm n ( , ) Rp2 g
2
Cact d Cpas d .
(1)
ppas ( , ) Rp g Cpas d ,
(6)
the
12
forces, denoted as shown in Fig. 3, can be determined as
follows:
Fm1 2
Rp2 g
Fm2 Fm6
Fm3 Fm5
l
2
pas
( ) Cact ( ) d ,
(7)
/2
Rp2 g
l
Cact ( ) Cpas ( ) d ,
2 / 6
Rp2 g
l
2
5 / 6
act
/2
( ) Cpas ( ) d .
(8)
(9)
(2)
sin 2
).
m
(4)
The load from the belt is the result of the weight and
stiffness of the belt material. The concentrated force
Fbn [N] from the belt with line mass per unit of length
m 'b [kg/m] and width B [m] for each roll of the idler
assembly is evaluated by follows:
mb g 2 Rp
l ,
6
m g 2 Rp
mg
p
Fb3 Fb5 Fstif b
l cos ,
B
6
3
m g 2 Rp
Fb4 Fstif b
l .
6
B
Fb1 Fstif
l
( pact ppas ) .
2
(5)
66
(10)
(11)
(12)
(13)
Fstif
hb3
Eb2
l ' .
1 1 2 24 Rp 2
(14)
to each other.
Eventually, the total normal contact force for each
roll Fn [N] for each n-th roll is formed by the sum of
forces from the material and the belt:
Fn Fm n Fb n .
(15)
67
x2
y2
,
2 R1 2 R2
(16)
where b x a and x R1 , y R2 .
( x, y )
m
E0
Ek
(a 2 x 2 ) i i
2 R1h
i 1 hR1
x a
x a ( a ki ) 1 exp
ki
In (17) parameter ki
iVb
Ei
[ m4 / s 2 ];
c2
c 2 R2 z0 .
2 R2
(19)
(17)
E0
[Pa]
Fz 2
( x, y )dxdy .
q 1
for odd numbers of the q.
2
4) The calculation of the x-coordinates of the leading
edge function x a ( y ) for the centrelines of each strip.
y2
w(a( y ), y ) 0 a( y ) 2 R1 z0
.
2 R2
0 b ( y )
68
(20)
where p
(18)
2c
6c
; ; y p
.
q
q
(21)
R1 (c 2 y12 )
,
R2
(22)
a2 , a3 , , a p .
Fr n
m
E0
Ek
(a12 b12 ) i i
2 R1h
i 1 hR1
b2 , b3 , , bp .
p aj
y a1
2 b1
j 2 b j
where y
R1
(27)
b a
b1 a1 (a1 ki ) 1 exp 1 1 0, (23)
ki
My
2
R1
p aj
y a1
x
y
x
y
x ( x, y )dx
(
,
)d
2 b1
j 2 b j
(28)
f ind
F
n 1
rn
(29)
2c
q .
(25)
data
Fz F
calc
z
( z0 ) 0 .
M y 2
x ( x, y )dxdy .
(26)
0 b( y )
in
[7]
and
equal:
E0 7 106 Nm2 ;
69
Q = 25%
Q = 50%
Q = 75%
0.04
0.035
f ind [-]
0.03
0.025
0.02
0.01
0.005
2
Vb [m/s]
10
0.04
0.035
f ind [-]
0.03
0.025
0.02
0.015
0.01
0.005
0
0
Vb [m/s]
10
5. CONCLUSION
70
0.015
0
0
L. Solazzi
Assistant Professor
University of Brescia
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering
1. INTRODUCTION
71
3. TYPES OF CRANES
72
73
74
4. RESULTS
75
5. CONCLUSIONS
76
A.Dentsoras
Associate Professor
University of Patras
Dept.of Mech. Eng. & Aeronautics
Machine Design Lab.
1. INTRODUCTION
77
78
Every element
, has a value according to
where the cell belongs to. More specificaly, if a cell
,
belongs to subset , the element of the matrix
that corresponds to that cell takes the value 1, if the cell
the respective value is 2 and
, , ,
belongs to
correspond to 0, 3, 4, 5 respectively. The cells
and
,
whose coordinates are points of a circulation
line, take as value in the respective elements of
the number of the line they belong.
2.2 Elevator Utilization Intensity Index
3
where in this function:
Type of
working
personnel
Seniors
Seniors +
visitors
Average
Managers
Executive
managers
0.280
3.50
1.00
0.160
6.00
0.57
0.100
10.0
0.36
0.050
20.0
0.18
0.033
20.0
0.12
1 ,
2 ,,
where
1,2, ,
and
is the mean
number of elevator calls per day done by the
and
people that work, use or visit usable area
1 ,
2 ,,
is the
maximum of the mean numbers of elevator calls
per day from people of all usable areas of
space .
Ratio
is normalized. This implies that for a
usable area hosting people that do not use elevators
at all the mean value of elevator calls per day is
practically zero and so ratio
is zero too. On
the other hand, for cells belonging to usable areas
with maximum mean values of elevator calls per
day, ratio
equals to 1. The normalization of
values is very comfortable when weighted
formulations have to be used.
2.3 Calculation and minimization of mean walking
distances
1 17.9
2 17.9
21 11.7
9.4 2 17.9 9.4
example in
18,3 the minimum walking
distance between the eighteenth node
and the
entrance of the third usable area is written and its
value is 44.7 m.
The correlation of
,
and
matrices makes possible the calculation of minimum
walking distance from a cell
, , that belongs to
, to the entrance of every usable area
. More
specificaly,
provides the number p of the
circulation line
the cell belongs to. Then the p row
of
shows the two circulation nodes that define
line
. In order to comprehend the method, assume
that the first node is
_ and the second one is
,2
1,2, , . Additionally,
_ , with 1
provides the coordinates of nodes
and
79
examined cell
, from nodes
and
that define line , where the cell belongs, with the use
of Euclidean norm. Now, considering a usable area ,
provides the minimum walking distance from
nodes
_ and
_ to that areaI by the matrix
elements
1 ,
and
2 ,
respectively. By choosing the minor value of
and
2 ,
and adding to it
1 ,
the distance calculated previously between the
or
and the examined
respective node
cell
, , the minimum walking distance between the
cell and the entrance of the usable area is calculated.
The multiplication of this distance with the respective
value of the Intensity of Elevator Utilization
, gives
the weighted minimum walking distance between the
cell and the area. Eventually, the minimum weighted
mean value of all the distances from the examined cell
,
to the entrance of every usable area is given
by the norm given below:
equation:
,
6
where,
min
,1 ,
,1 ,
min
,4 ,
min
,1 ,
min
,4 ,
min
,4 ,
,4 ,
,4 ,
,4 ,
, 3
,1 ,
, 5
,1 ,
, 2
,1 ,
,4 ,
, 6
,1 ,
and
, which , are given from equations
(1), (2) and the cell coordinates , .
The cell
,
which presents the the minimum
weighted mean walking distance
is the cell that
corresponds to the optimum point of the circulation
paths of the floor. The entrance(s) to the elevator system
should be placed at or near this point.
2.4 The search for the optimal solution
80
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
Variant 2
Variant 3
Variant 4
D(k)
R(k)
D(k)
R(k)
D(k)
R(k)
D(k)
R(k)
0.36
0.36
0.36
0.36
0.36
0.36
0.36
0.36
0.36
0.36
0.36
0.36
0.36
0.36
0.36
0.36
0.36
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0.36
0.36
0.36
0.36
0.36
0.36
0.36
0.57
1
1
0.36
0.36
0.36
0.18
1
1
1
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.2
0.6
0.4
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.5
0.3
0.3
0.1
1
1
0.7
0.36
0.36
0.36
1
0.36
0.36
0.36
0.36
0.36
0.36
0.36
0.36
1
1
0.36
0.18
0.36
0.5
0.5
0.5
1
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.5
0.7
0.7
0.7
1
1
1
0.5
0.2
0.8
1
1
1
1
1
0.36
0.36
0.36
0.36
0.36
0.36
0.36
0.36
0.36
0.36
0.18
0.36
1
1
1
1
1
0.7
0.5
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.5
0.8
0.4
0.5
0.2
0.5
Variants
1
2
3
4
Coordinates of
optimal circulation
point (m)
value (m)
x
11.6
16.2
47.2
18.0
28.659
17.645
22.499
21.061
y
20.4
32.8
15.5
9.4
Optimum
Coordinates of the
center of hoistway(s)
entrance(s) (m)
x
12.6
14.2/18.2
45.1
18.0
y
21.6
30.7
15.5
11.5
81
Figure 1. Areas, elements, entrances, circulation paths, lines and nodes of the examined floor and graphical representation of
the results by the implementation of the proposed method
82
Rastislav ostakov
PhD. Ass. Professor
University of Novi Sad
Faculty of Technical Sciences
Atila Zeli
M.Sc., Teaching Assistant
University of Novi Sad
Faculty of Technical Sciences
1. INTRODUCTION
83
a)
b)
c)
d)
e)
f)
84
According to Kennedy's theorem concerning instantaneous slide poles of mechanism plane motion, [7, 8],
velocity poles of system elements rail-wheel-crane are
determined. Regarding wheel motion relative to the rail
for a start, instantaneous slide pole MRB is positioned on
the direction perpendicular to vsl, and pole P MCB of
crane skewing relative to the rail on the direction
perpendicular to v. The wheel shaft is firmly connected
with the crane supporting structure through its bearings,
so wheel and crane can be regarded as parts of the same
body. As direction of wheel shaft translation velocity is
parallel to the crane travelling velocity, they do not form
any intersection point, so the third pole MCR is positioned in infinity (not shown in fig. 6). On the basis of
angle and triangle similarity, it follows that poles MRB
and P are positioned on the same straight line parallel
with the wheel shaft axis. The distance between these
two points lP depends on the magnitude of velocity vo.
4. SURVEY OF RELEVANT NORMS CONCERNING
LOADS DUE TO CRANE SKEWING
85
JUS M.D1.050
Norm
(SRPS) EN 15011
Figure 8. Calculation model of bridge crane with independent drives, according to (SRPS) EN 15011
86
Crane capacity Q
Trolley mass QT
Crane mass QC
Bridge rail track span l
External crane wheels axes distance bS
Type of crane guide means
Skewing angle
20 t
8,5 t
21 t
22,5 m
4,4 m
flanged wheels
0,005 rad
Crane
1
2
Number
of driven
wheels
2 wheel
4
axial
2 mobility
4 FF/FM
h, m
FS, kN
according to:
[12] [10, 11, 13]
[14]
[10, 11, 13]
max
52,0/37,9 52,0/14,0 4,4/4,4
22,7
sum 97,0/71,1 97,0/50,1 32,9/61,5
62,1 100,2/73,3 100,2/51,0 61,9/119,5
87
88
Anton Hribar
Univ.Dipl.-ing.
Litostroj Steel Ltd.
Production of Quality Steel Castings
Ljubljana, Slovenia
The horizontal inertial forces imparted to the load in the case of the linear
motion of the load suspension point are studied. The mathematical model
is developed, which enables the numerical simulations of observed
phenomenon. The breaking phase is observed as is in the standard F.E.M.
for cranes. The model enables simulations with several types of breaking of
the pivot point where the standard assumption of constant deceleration
force is included. From the simulation results the curves of the coefficient
of the horizontal inertial forces are plotted and compared with standard
curves. Interesting deviations are noticeable.
Keywords: cranes, deceleration, load sway, horizontal inertial forces,
deviations.
1. INTRODUCTION
FC ,max h FC ,av ,
(1)
FC ,av m1 aav .
(2)
89
t acc
.
t1
(3)
m1
.
m
(4)
d
dt
T T
V
Q nj , j 1, ... , s.
q j q j q j
(5)
selected
q1 x ,
(6)
q2 ,
(7)
2
2
(8)
m x 2 m1
2
2
2
( x l 2 l x cos ),
2
2
(9)
AF F x .
(10)
Qx, F F .
(11)
90
(m m1 ) x m1 l F ,
(12)
m1 l x m1 l 2 m1 l g 0 .
(13)
(
(14)
d
inn
thee research beccause the coeffficient h is determined
acccordance withh Eq. 15. The fforces needed
d in Eq. 15 aree
deffined in standaard [23]:
FC , av F
m1
,
m m1
FC , max FC , av (1 cos(r t d )) 2
(17))
r2
sin 2 ( r t d ) . (18))
12
(19))
4. DETERM
MINATION OF THE COEFFICIENT OF
HORIZON
NTAL INERTIIAL FORCES
h
inerrtial
From thee Eq. 1, the cooefficient of horizontal
forces h caan be defined as:
a
FC , max
FC , av
(
(15)
and
d the case wiith the linearlly increasing driving forcee
and
d breaking forrce ( F F (t ) F0 t f factoor, F ).
All these cases are connsidered for the differentt
opeerating conditions enabling the diag
grams of thee
coeefficient of thhe horizontal inertial forces h to bee
callculated in acccordance withh Eq. 15. The diagram withh
currves for all fouur types of deeceleration is shown in Fig..
3. For
F all the currves the ratio 0 .
h 2
(
(16)
91
3
2,5
2
1,5
1
0,5
0
0
0,2
0,4
F=const
for
a=const
0,6
a=linear
0,8
F=linear
6. CONCLUSION
a a (t )
acceleration/deceleration
a av
a0
F
FC (t )
FC ,av
FC , max
FC , max
f factor ,a
f factor , F
proportionality
factor
of
the
acceleration/deceleration
proportionality factor of the breaking force
Fm
F0
93
m1
qj
Q nj
Q x, F
s
t
time
tacc
V1
t1
Greek symbols
time ratio, defined as the ratio between the
acceleration time tacc and the period of
oscillation t1
critical
value of
crit
virtual work of the non-conservative active
AF
force F
x
virtual displacement of the force F
mass ratio, defined as the ratio between the
94
Dr Miomir Jovanovi
Full Professor
University of Ni
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering
Mr Goran Radoii
Research Assistant
University of Ni
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering
Danijel Markovi
Teaching Assistant
University of Ni
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering
1. INTRODUCTION
M q K q 0 ,
q i sin it .
(1)
(2)
In the equations (1) and (2) are used labels: [M] inertial mass matrix; [K] - stiffness matrix; {q} displacement vector; q - acceleration vector; i - ith
circular natural frequency in radians per unit time; {}i
- eigenvector (mode shape) for ith circular frequency; t time. After replacing the solution {q} and q (2) in the
system of equations (1), the characteristic matrix form -
95
M 0 .
(3)
0
0
0
.
n2
(4)
1 , 2 , , n .
(5)
Figure 1. Examination of the tower crane POTAIN 744e (MIN - KOPEX Ni, 2012): a. Overview of measurement; b. Trial load
with sensors of acceleration and force on the hook; c, d. Measurement of foundation displacement
96
Figure 2. Layout of measuring equipment for experimental determination of dynamic behavior of crane Potain 744e
T T
1
11 n
1 m
TMG 2 TMG3 T2,i T3, j (6)
m j 1
2
2 n i 1
Figure 3. Deformations of the structure caused by rotation slewing of boom without load
97
TQ
1
11 n
1 m
TMG1 TMG 2 T1,i T2, j (7)
2
2 n i 1
m j 1
L
13
2
7.233 s.
g
9.81
(8)
Mode Shape
Mode 1
Mode 2
Mode 3
Mode 4
Frequency
(Hz)
0.1583
0.44789
0.53777
1.4859
Mode Shape
Mode 5
Mode 6
Mode 7
Mode 8
Frequency
(Hz)
1.5808
1.95857
2.02166
2.48
6.317
7.082
7.233
10.8
TQ
a.
b.
Figure 6. Torsional mode shapes: a. Mode 8, 8 = 2.48 Hz;
b. Mode 13, 13 = 6.114 Hz
99
6. CONCLUSION
100
Neboja Zdravkovi
Teaching Assistant
University of Kragujevac
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering Kraljevo
Zoran Petkovi
Professor
University of Belgrade
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering
Milomir Gai
Professor
University of Kragujevac
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering Kraljevo
Mile Savkovi
Associate Professor
University of Kragujevac
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering Kraljevo
1. INTRODUCTION
101
Figure 2. Analytical model of three-segment articulated structure used for determination of deflection-payload dependence
using strain energy method
102
fz
fx
Ad
X
M ( s )
1 m 1 i
M i (s) Xi ds
E i 1 I i 0
(1)
RC 3
X 0
. (2)
FB 2 FB sin 22
X
FC sin 33 L3 cos 3 .
l33
(3)
X
L2 sin 2 L3 cos 3 .
l22
(5)
(6)
RC 2 RC cos ( 3 2 ) " .
(7)
FC 2 FC sin 32 X
" ' 3 .
(8)
(9)
X 0
where: Ad - strain energy, E - modulus of elasticity, m number of sections (subdivisions), Mi(s) - bending
moment of section i, s - floating section coordinate. The
first action taken in order to define expressions for
bending moments and corresponding partial derivatives
for each section is to find analytical dependencies of
joint reactions with the respect to inclination angles and
for two separate load cases: case 1 - payload G acts
only, case 2 - virtual force X acts only.
(4)
X
L3 l33 cos 3 .
l33
FC
F cos X
sin , sin ' C
.
RC
RC
(10)
(11)
3 33
(12)
X
L3 cos 3 l32 sin 2 .
l32
(13)
X
l22 sin 2 L2 sin 2 L3 cos 3 . (14)
l22
X
L1 sin 1 L2 sin 2 L3 cos 3 .
l11
(15)
103
FB1 FB sin 21
X
L2 sin 2 L3 cos 3 . (16)
l21
2 22 .
(22)
3
") .
2
RB1
(17)
" ' 1 .
(18)
F cos X
F
cos ' B
, sin ' B sin .
RB
RB
(19)
(20)
X
l21 sin 1 L2 sin 2 L3 cos 3 . (23)
l21
X
l11 sin 1 L1 sin 1 L2 sin 2 L3 cos 3 .(24)
l11
(21)
Fj g j G x j X , j 1,...,11 .
(25)
segment III
segment II
segment I
Joint
Force
G
X
L1 cos 1 L2 cos 1 L3 sin 3 l11 cos 1 l11 sin 1 L1 sin 1 L2 sin 2 L3 cos 3
l11
l11
F1 RA1
F2 FA1
G
L1 cos 1 L2 cos 2 L3 sin 3
l11
X
L1 sin 1 L2 sin 2 L3 cos 3
l11
F3 FB1
G
L2 cos 2 L3 sin 3
l21
X
L2 sin 2 L3 cos 3
l21
F4 RB1
G
l21 cos 1 L2 cos 2 L3 sin 3
l21
X
l21 sin 1 L2 sin 2 L3 cos 3
l21
F5 RB 2
G
l22 cos 2 L2 cos 2 L3 sin 3
l22
X
l22 sin 2 L2 sin 2 L3 cos 3
l22
F6 FB 2
G
L2 cos 2 L3 sin 3
l22
X
L2 sin 2 L3 cos 3
l22
F7 FC 2
G
L3 sin 3
l32
F8 RC 2
G
l32 cos 2 L3 sin 3
l32
X
L3 cos 3 l32 sin 2
l32
F9 RC 3
G
l33 L3 sin 3
l33
X
L3 l33 cos 3
l33
F10 FC 3
G
L3 sin 3
l33
F11 RD 3
G sin 3
104
X
L3 cos 3
l32
X
L3 cos 3
l33
X cos 3
fz5
fz3
Gg 42 s33
.
3EI1
(30)
fz4
Gg52 s43
.
3EI 2
(31)
G
3
( g5 g6 )s5 g5 s4 ( g5 s4 )3 .(32)
3EI 2 ( g5 g 6 )
fx2
fz6
Gg82 s63
.
3EI 2
(33)
fz7
Gg92 s73
.
3EI 3
(34)
f z8
Gg112 s83
.
3EI 3
(35)
f x1
Gg1 x1 s13
.
3EI1
(36)
( g1 g 2 )( x1 x2 ) 3
s2 g1 x1 s12 s2
G
3
. (37)
EI1 x1 ( g1 g 2 ) g1 ( x1 x2 ) 2
s1 s2
2
f x3
Gg 4 x4 s33
.
3EI1
(38)
fx4
Gg5 x5 s43
.
3EI 2
(39)
Moment
of
Bending moment
inertia
s1 l11
s2 L1 l11 l21
s3 l21
F4 s
s4 l22
F5 s
s5 L2 l22 l32
s6 l32
s7 l33
s8 L3 l33
F1s
F1 s s1 F2 s
I1
f x5
F5 s s4 F6 s
I2
F8 s
( g5 g 6 )( x5 x6 ) 3
s5 g5 x5 s42 s5
G
3
. (40)
EI 2 x5 ( g5 g 6 ) g5 ( x5 x6 ) 2
s4 s5
2
f x6
Gg8 x8 s63
.
3EI 2
(41)
f x7
Gg9 x9 s73
.
3EI 3
(42)
f x8
(43)
F9 s
I3
F11s
fx
Ad
X
8
Ad
M i ( s )
1 8 1
f zi M i ( s )
ds . (26)
G i 1
E i 1 I i 0
G
si
X 0
f xi
i 1
M i ( s )
1 8 1 i
M i (s)
ds
E i 1 I i 0
X
(28)
G
3
( g1 g 2 ) s2 g1s1 ( g1s1 )3 . (29)
3EI1 ( g1 g 2 )
Gg12 s13
.
3EI1
f z1
.(27)
X 0
105
Model (cm)
Booms shape
1 2 3 ()
15-15-30
30-30-45
45-45-60
60-60-75
75-75-90
FEM (cm)
Relative Error
(%)
fz
fx
fz
fx
-4.259
-4.357
-3.893
-2.993
-1.896
-0.387
1.040
2.268
2.966
2.949
-4.335
-4.417
-3.928
-2.937
-1.980
-0.396
1.051
2.305
2.867
3.095
1.75
1.36
0.89
1.9
4.24
2.27
1.05
1.61
3.45
4.71
4. CONCLUSION
106
Nenad Zrni
Associated Professor
University of Belgrade
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering,
Belgrade, Serbia
Marko Langerholc
Teaching Assistant
University of Ljubljana
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering,
Ljubljana, Slovenia
Boris Jerman
Assistant Professor
University of Ljubljana
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering,
Ljubljana, Slovenia
Milo orevi
Research Associate
University of Belgrade
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering,
Belgrade, Serbia
1. INTRODUCTION
107
108
Fig
gure 6. Close-up detail of driv
ving shaft with sprocketwheel and smootth ring for chain guidence support
Fig
gure 7. Layout of
o a roller chain: 1) Outer pla
ate, 2) Inner
pla
ate, 3) Pin, 4) Bushing, 5) Rolller
Fig
gure 8. The bas
sic design of pu
ull chain turns
109
b
normal forcee, which prodduces the fricction at the belt
turns, equalss to the sum of
o rather big tension forces in
the chain braanches during conveyor opeeration.
The described configuuration for onee pulling chain is
shown on Figgure 9.
Figure 10. Me
easurements off voltage, el. cu
urrent and rota
ational speed of
o the driving motor
m
of basic c
conveyor desig
gn
Figure 11. Me
easurements off voltage, el. cu
urrent and rota
ational speed of
o the driving motor
m
of improv
ved conveyor design
d
Electric power
p
requireed for driving the lower chaain
conveyor, caalculated from
m the measureed quantities, is
shown in Figures
F
12-13. Average power decreassed
from 9.6 kW
W for the bassic design to 8.7 kW for the
t
improved design
d
resultiing in 9 % lower pow
wer
consumptionn.
Additionaal observationn showed that power currve
had lower values and fluctuationss. Power levvel
f
2.3 kW
W (24 % of an
fluctuations decreased from
wer) to 1.5 kW (17 % of an average
a
powerr).
average pow
110
he driving moto
or of improved conveyor design
Figure 13. Drive power of th
4. CONCLU
USION
AC
CKNOWLEDG
GMENT
111
112
Nenad Zrni
Assistant Professor
University of Belgrade
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering
Zoran Petkovi
Professor
University of Belgrade
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering
1. INTRODUCTION
Figure 1. a) Real model of the gantry crane, b) FE model of the framework, c) Moving mass, d) Dynamic interaction
3. MODEL FORMULATION
114
M st U
st K st U P (t )
(1)
where Mst, Cst, Kst are the mass, damping and stiffness
, U
, U , are the
matrices of the structural system; U
respective acceleration, velocity and displacement
vectors for the system and P(t ) is the external force
vector acting upon the structure.
(2)
2i j (i j j i )
2j
i2
, b
2( j j ii )
2j
P (t ) 0..0
f1s
f 2s
f3s
f 4s
f5s
f 6s
0..0 (8)
(9)
N x [ N1 0 0 N 4 0 0]
N3 0 N5 N6 ]
N y [0 N 2
(10)
(11)
(7)
where
f 2s (t )
xm (t ) (s - 1)l
l
(3)
i2
{ f s (t )} [ f1s (t )
f 4s (t )
f 5s (t )
f 6s (t )]
(4)
where
f1s (t ) N1 ( x) Px (t ) , f 4s (t ) N 4 ( x) Px (t ) ,
f 2s (t ) N 2 ( x) Py (t ) , f3s (t ) N3 ( x) Py (t ) ,
f5s (t ) N5 ( x) Py (t ) , f 6s (t ) N 6 ( x) Py (t )
N X [ 0 0 N x 0]
N Y [0 0 N y 0]
(12)
(13)
(5)
xm (t )
] 1
l
(6)
115
M st U
st K st U N X Px NY Py
(14)
(17)
x N X U
w
y
w
N 'Y' U
x
2
N 'Y U
2N 'Y U
(18)
x N Y U (19)
(20)
x
Px (mss )
xm (mss ) w
Py (mss ) g mss wy
0.04
0.02
0.00
0.02
v1
v2
0.0
where
M1 mss N Y N Y mss N XT N X
C1 2mss x N YT N'Y
K 1 mss x 2 N YT N''Y mss
x N YT N'Y
0.2
116
0.8
1.0
0.8
1.0
a)
Vertical displacement, node 6 m
0.4
0.6
Normalized time t
0.00
v1
v2
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
Normalized time t
b)
Figure 4. a) Horizontal displacement UX1, b) Vertical
displacement UY6; v1, v2
0.04
UX1
0.02
0.00
0.02
UY6
0.04
0
6
Time t s
10
12
0.04
0.02
1. mode
2. mode
T1=0,58s, f1=1,72 Hz
T2=0,2 s, f2=4,93 Hz
0.00
14
0.02
Moving force
Moving mass
0
6
Time t s
10
12
a)
0.00
Hz
Horizontaldisplacement, node 1 m
12
Frequencies first 3
10
f3
8
6
f2
f1
Moving force
0.01
Moving mass
0.02
6
Time t s
10
12
0.03
0.04
7. CONCLUSION
0.05
0
6
Time t s
10
b)
Figure 6. a) Horizontal displacement UX1, b) Vertical
displacement UY6; v2; Moving mass/moving force
12
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
Mst
Cst
Kst
REFERENCES
P(t)
mss
angular frequency
i , j
damping ratios
frequency
118
fi s (t )
Ni
shape functions
element length
xm (t )
Px,
Py
gravitational acceleration
overall time
moment of inertia
Young's modulus
mass density
SESSION B
CONSTRUCTION AND MINING
EQUIPMENT AND TECHNOLOGIES
Eugeniusz Rusinski
Professor
Wroclaw University of Technology, Poland
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering
Przemyslaw Moczko
PhD
Wroclaw University of Technology, Poland
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering
Damian Pietrusiak
MSc
Wroclaw University of Technology, Poland
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering
Grzegorz Przybylek
PhD
Wroclaw University of Technology, Poland
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering
1. INTRODUCTION
119
0,4
Cursor A:
3,375 Hz
0,35
0,315 mm
O/All 0,516 mm RMS
0,3
mm RMS
0,25
0,2
0,15
0,1
0,05
0
10
12
14
16
18
20
22
24
Hz
Empty Chart
CJ615 - C1 - Horizontal - Dis Spec/Wfm 25 Hz
2012-02-21 09:52:23
1,5
1
mm
0,5
0
-0,5
-1
-1,5
2012-02-21 09:52:23
8
secs
10
12
14
16
Description
Displacements
measurements
Displacement (mm)
x (longitudinal)
y (transverse)
1.12
1.92
120
Frequency (Hz)
3.39
5.96
14.50
Figure 10. Fatigue cracks locations
121
k
m
[Hz]
(1)
Where:
k stiffness [N/m]
m mass [kg]
Taking into account the above equation the crusher
support can be stiffened to increase natural frequencies
or additional mass can be placed on the frame to lower
vibration frequency. The first of the mentioned solution
was chosen. This is due to the fact that cross section of
the crusher supporting frame, shown in figure 12, is not
stiff enough in transverse direction.
122
calculations
of
the
modified
Frequency (Hz)
8.52
8.72
16.85
123
b)
0,035
0,03
mm RMS
0,025
0,02
0,015
0,01
0,005
0
2
10
12
14
16
18
20
22
24
Hz
Empty Chart
CJ615 - Po Naprawie Pb - Horizontal - Dis Spec/Wfm 25 Hz
2012-06-20 08:41:21
O/All 0,115 mm RMS
0,6
0,4
mm
0,2
-0,2
-0,4
2012-06-20 08:41:21
8
secs
10
12
14
16
5. CONCLUSION
124
T. Smolnicki
Associate Professor
Wrocaw University of Technology
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering
D. Pietrusiak
Ph.D. candidate, M.Sc. Eng.
Wrocaw University of Technology
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering
1. INTRODUCTION
125
3. BOUNDARY CONDITIONS
126
127
128
Jakub Gottvald
Head of department
VTKOVICE AM a.s.
1. INTRODUCTION
Start of mining
Vertical moves of BW boom
Horizontal move
of BW boom
60
0
Rotation of BW
400
0
600
0
70
68
66
Move forward
Moves backward
11.3.2010 18:36:00
11.3.2010 18:48:00
11.3.2010 19:00:00
11.3.2010 19:12:00
Figure 3. Time-frequency amplitude spectrum [mg], accelerometer A_06z, time period no. 1
130
11.3.2010 19:24:00
Time [s]
Figure 4. Time-frequency amplitude spectrum [mg], accelerometer A_17y, time period no. 1
-12
-30
BW boom horizontal position -90
-150
Input power BW boom
Input power Bucket wheel
Revolutions Bucket wheel
Change of terrace
100
0
1200
600
0
600
0
111
Stops of BW
12.3.2010 20:52:00
12.3.2010 20:56:00
12.3.2010 21:00:00
12.3.2010 21:04:00
12.3.2010 21:08:00
Time [s]
131
Figure 6. Time-frequency amplitude spectrum [mg], accelerometer A_06z, time period no. 2
Figure 7. Time-frequency amplitude spectrum [mg], accelerometer A_17y, time period no. 2
the end of the results from old terraces and results from
the new one. Throughout all the measurement the oil
pump of gearbox of the bucket wheel was in progress,
see significant amplitude peak at frequency 2.26 Hz.
2.4 Selected time period no. 3
-10
-12
-14
0
BW boom -60
horizontal position
-120
BW boom vertical position
Mining
Mining
Change of terrace
140
0
1200
600
0
1040
960
72
Movement of BWE
54
36
14.3.2010 8:30:00
14.3.2010 8:40:00
14.3.2010 8:50:00
14.3.2010 9:00:00
14.3.2010 9:10:00
14.3.2010 9:20:00
Time [s]
Figure 9. Time-frequency amplitude spectrum [mg], accelerometer A_06z, time period no. 3
Figure 10. Time-frequency amplitude spectrum [mg], accelerometer A_17y, time period no. 3
3. CONCLUSION
133
134
Dragan Komljenovic
Adjunct Professor
Department of Mining, Metallurgical and
Materials Engineering
Laval University, Quebec-City, Canada
Reliability Engineer
Hydro-Quebec
Montreal, Canada
Samir Nuric
Associate Professor
University of Tuzla
Faculty of Mining, Geology and
Civil Engineering
Lazar Kricak
Professor
University of Belgrade
Faculty of Mining and Geology
Milorad Pantelic
Assistant Professor
University of Kragujevac
Technical Faculty in aak
1. INTRODUCTION
2. LITERATURE REVIEW
135
materials
where:
dsr [mm]
[kN/m3]
c0 [mm]
136
(1)
(2)
where:
fg geometric factor representing a ratio between three
main dimensions of a sample. The value of this
factor for a ball is 1. In bulk materials, this value
varies between 1.3 to 1.6.
foz factor which depends on the corn shape and the
state of corn surface. For rough surfaces with sharp
edges, its value may vary between 1.7-2.5.
Values of the digging resistance of some bulk
materials are given in Table 1. The results show that the
corn size has a decisive impact on the digging resistance
of bulk materials. The second factor of importance is the
corn shape, and the third one involves the bulk density
[11]. For practical purposes (machine selection and
operation), equation (1) can generally be used [4]. Only
in the case where the corn size is extremely large, or the
machine operator expresses a need for special
requirements, detailed calculations and measurements
may be necessary.
As far as digging power calculation is concerned, the
approach developed for bucket wheel excavators may
apply [3], [4].
-
(3)
z
c (1 cos u ) b u [m]
2
(4)
cutting power,
power to overcome friction between a bucket wall
and material being dug,
power to overcome resistance due to material
ploughing.
fobl
z
and
(5)
Nk Nd
(6)
5540 N r Qthm D g
[kN / m]
D ni Qthm
69.25 u
15
(7)
V
[ m3 / h ]
tk t m
(8)
Where:
V [m3] - reclaiming volume in a bloc
tk [h] - digging time
tm [h] - machine manoeuvring time in the working bloc
The manoeuvring time tm accounts for manoeuvres
of a the machine in a digging cut, such as positioning a
R&S/R during a reclaiming operation. It is necessary to
accurately determine the value of these three variables
to calculate the effective reclaiming capacity.
-
Digging time
v
a2
i ) (Interval 4);
137
Figure 4:
Figure 3:
t k ( i ) t ji [ s]
(9)
j 1
(10)
dsr [mm]
(11)
138
Concentrate (CON)
pi [%]
Size [m]
Reclaimed volume
1000
500
315
250
150
125
106
63
30
3.6
19.3
21.9
10.5
22.6
6.2
4.5
8.9
2.4
280m = 0.28 mm
[t/m3]
(average)
2.6
[0]
34
Corn shape and surface state
2 pi X i2 X
i 1
(12)
Figure 6:
(14)
and
PkL [kN]
(15)
are uniformely distributed random numbers.
The random numbers XU described by a uniform
distribution are generated as follows [12]:
kL [kN/m]
(1-)/2 =
(1+)/2 =
Lower limit
Upper limit
Lower limit
Upper limit
0.90
0.95
0.99
0.05
0.95
9.41
14.08
7.65
11.45
0.025
0.975
8.97
14.53
7.29
11.81
0.005
0.995
8.09
15.40
6.58
12.52
(16)
PkL [kN]
kL [kN/m]
min
8.8
7.1
max
16.8
13.7
Average
11.7
9.6
1.42
1.15
Standard deviation
L [m]
5.0
15.0
22.5
Qeff [m3/h]
743.1
766.2
770.4
139
Figure 7:
Density
[kN/m3]
Bulk density
[kN/m3]
Chromite ore
41
Limestone
Gravel
Magnesite
Transported coal
22
26
29
12
140
Corn size
[mm]
19
26
25
22
15
14.2
15
9
8
7
Average corn
size dsr [mm]
2
0100
0100
0300
0200
100300
0100
0100
0200
2
24
42
171
57
49.9
203
20
48
110
Corn shape
factor fobl
Digging resistance
[kN/m]
1.8
2.3
2.3
2.3
1.8
1.5
2.3
1.8
1.8
1.8
4.3
7.2
9.6
83.0
10.0
8.3
13.05
5.2
8.1
22.0
Bonjak M. Sran
Professor
University of Belgrade
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering
Petkovi D. Zoran
Professor
University of Belgrade
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering
Gnjatovi B. Neboja
Assistant
University of Belgrade
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering
Jerman Boris
Assistant Professor
University of Ljubljana
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering
1. INTRODUCTION
141
Nomenclature
Vertical wheel reaction force
Horizontal wheel reaction
force
Vertical forces reduced to
track wheel axle supports
Horizontal forces reduced to
track wheel axle supports
Figure 5. Redesigned TWB structure (added elements are
red colored) [13]
142
VF=110.8
HE=461.2
3. FE MODELS
143
4. VALIDATION OF FE MODELS
(a) original TWB structure (model 5)
Lateral
force
FB (kN)
144
Displacement (mm)
experiment
Precentage
difference
FEM
700
5.2
5.4
3.8
800
5.8
6.0
3.4
900
6.5
6.5
0.0
1000
7.2
7.0
2.8
(a) mod
del 1
5. RESULTS
S OF FE ANA
ALYSES
(b) mod
del 2
(c) mod
del 3
145
6. DISCUSSION
N
(d) model 4
(e) model 5
Model
(f) model
m
6
Figure 16. Dis
stribution of av
veraged von Miisses stresses
862
2
249
9
431
1
133
3
249
9
95
146
MAvMS (MPa)
Relative
MAvMS*
80
299
1.20
85
288
1.16
90
278
1.12
95
269
1.08
100
262
1.05
105
255
1.02
110
249
1.00
115
243
0.98
120
239
0.96
125
237
0.95
147
148
Petkovi D. Zoran
Professor
University of Belgrade
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering
Bonjak M. Sran
Professor
University of Belgrade
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering
Gnjatovi B. Neboja
Assistant
University of Belgrade
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering
Mihajlovi M. Vaso
Reserch Associate
University of Belgrade
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering
Milojevi Z. Goran
Reserch Associate
University of Belgrade
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering
1. INTRODUCTION
main motor
Figure 1. Bucket wheel excavator SchRs 350/5x12
gearbox
Figure 2. BW drive
149
150
151
zone 1
zone 2
zone 1
zone 2
152
1/1/1/1
1/1/1/2
1/2/1/1
1/2/1/2
Zone 1
Zone 2
Zone 1
Zone 2
Zone 1
Zone 2
Zone 1
Zone 2
159
200
142
196
165
204
146
200
Zone 1
Zone 2
Zone 1
Zone 2
Zone 1
Zone 2
Zone 1
Zone 2
171
218
153
212
181
222
157
217
1/1/2/1
1/1/2/2
2/1/1/1
1/2/2/1
2/1/1/2
1/2/2/2
2/2/1/1
2/2/1/2
Zone 1
Zone 2
Zone 1
Zone 2
Zone 1
Zone 2
Zone 1
Zone 2
146
211
134
208
150
246
137
213
2/1/2/1
2/1/2/2
2/2/2/1
2/2/2/2
Zone 1
Zone 2
Zone 1
Zone 2
Zone 1
Zone 2
Zone 1
Zone 2
159
227
143
223
163
231
146
227
Calculation model II
Load case
Maximum
stress value
(MPa)
Load case
Maximum
stress value
(MPa)
Load case
Maximum
stress value
(MPa)
Load case
Maximum
stress value
(MPa)
Calculation model I
Figure 14. Comparison of Von Mises stress values in the zone of BWB reconstruction
Figure 15. Comparison of maximum Von Mises stress values of the BWB structure
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
153
154
Miodrag Arsi
Professor
Institute for Testing Materials of Belgrade
Sran Bonjak
Professor
University of Belgrade
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering
Marko Rakin
Professor
University of Belgrade
Faculty of Technology and Metallurgy
Neboja Gnjatovi
Assistant
University of Belgrade
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering
Zoran Savi
B.Sc.ME
Institute for Testing Materials of Belgrade
RELIABILITY ASSESSMENT OF
WELDED JOINTS AT BUCKET- WHEEL
EXCAVATORS BASED ON
HYPERGEOMETRIC DISTRIBUTION OF
DEFECTS
In order to reduce costs of tests that need to be carried out on structural
welded joints and losses in the production due to excavator standstill, a
new method for reliability assessment of welded joints during exploitation
of bucket-wheel excavators has been developed. In this paper a part of
non-destructive testing results for the butt welded joints at bucket-wheel,
discharge and counter-weight boom structure is presented, prior to the
repair of the heavily damaged bucket-wheel excavator Sch Rs 1760x32/5.
It has been in operational mode for 17 years prior to the collapse, in other
words it has been subjected to 2.125.000 cycles of variable loading. For
the calculation of probability that x welded joints would be selected out of
overall Q, which comprise n welded joints with defects, hypergeometric
distribution has been used, while the reliability assessment for welded
jointed structures of bucket-wheel excavators has been performed on the
basis of defect analysis and probability of the growth of fatigue cracks in
welded joints. Through the use of this method testing costs have been
reduced by 70 %.
Keywords: bucket-wheel excavator, welded structure, experimental tests,
single selection method, reliability
1. INTRODUCTION
All bucket-wheel excavators at surface excavation
sites in the Republic of Serbia were manufactured by
german companies TAKRAF and Thyssen Krupp.
They have been designed in accordance with the
standard DIN 18800, through the use of structural steel
S 355 for all vital structures.
Class and quality of structural welded joints, as well
as definition of type and scope of non-destructive tests
are defined by standard DIN 22261-3, while the quality
assessment of welded joints during their creation, as
well as during exploitation of bucket-wheel excavators
is defined by procedure DR 16.20. Procedure 16.20 for
the testing of welded structures and standard DIN
22261-3 requires the following to be fulfilled: for class
B welded joints 100% non-destructive testing (visual
testing, magnetic particle testing, ultrasonic testing and
radiographic testing), for class C welded joints 20%
non-destructive testing and for class D welded joints
10% non-destructive testing. In available literature no
standards, norms, recommendations or methodologies
were found which prescribe a different method for
quality assessment of welded structures of bucket-wheel
excavators.
Plan and program of periodic testing of welded
joints at vital structures of bucket-wheel excavators
predict the inspection after 5.000 hours of service.
Taking into account the fact that there are many welded
joints that should be periodically tested, time required
for non-destructive tests, work that needs to be put in
and losses in production due to excavator standstill, its
Simple selection method has been used for nondestructive testing of butt-welded joints at structures of
the bucket-wheel boom subsystem, Figure 1, as well as
at structures of the discharge boom and of the
counterweight, Figure 2, before the repair of the
collapsed bucket-wheel excavator Sch Rs 1760x32/5
(Thyssen Krupp, Germany). Bucket-wheel excavator
has been in operational mode for 85.000 hours (17
years) prior to the collapse, in other words it has been
subjected to 2.125.000 cycles of variable loading,
Figure 3.
Tests performed on welded joints at structures of the
bucket-wheel boom and counterweight proved the
existence of surface and internal crack-type defects, or
disorder of heterogeneity similar to cracks. For the
establishment of history of their initiation and
growth, which occur due to variable loading (fatigue), it
is necessary to perform experimental testing in order to
establish crack growth rate.
155
(1)
156
m x
P( x )
C nx C Qmnx
C
m
Q
Q
Q!
, C Qm
m m! (Q m)!
(2)
Pj PNj P a a C , N j
(3)
j1
where:
PNj probability for the number of loading cycles
(Nj) between 2 tests,
k
P
j1
Nj
Piwj
CQmn
CQm
(4)
157
(5)
where:
Pde probability of detecting welded joints with defects
(cracks)
Pde Pdef Pp
(6)
Simple selection method was used during the nondestructive testing of welded joints at the vital
structures of the bucket-wheel excavator Sch Rs 1760 x
32/5. Number of tests (magnetic particle testing and
ultrasonic testing) performed on welded joints of
structural subsystems is as follows: on the bucket-wheel
boom 89, on the discharge boom 42 and on the
counterweight 23. Two cracks, up to 1,5 mm in length,
as well as four cracks shorter than 1 mm, were detected
through the use of non-destructive testing on parts of
welded structures of the bucket-wheel boom and
counterweight, Figure 7. On the carrying structure of the
discharge boom no cracks were detected.
Results of tests which referred to fatigue crack
growth rate in the area of the welded joint (Figures 4, 5)
showed that it takes approximately N = 3 106 loading
cycles for the 2 mm long fatigue crack to be initiated
(initial fatigue crack on the specimen), while for the
period of operation until the collapse of 85.000 hours, or
to put it in a different way, for number of load changes
of N = 2.125.000 cycles, the 1.42 mm long initial
fatigue crack is to be expected.
Initial fatigue cracks, as shown in Figure 7, at first
grow most rapidly depth-wise (perpendicular to the
cross-sectional area of the welded joint), and in time
their growth rate may increase, decrease or stagnate,
which depends on conditions of exploitation, Figure 5.
Conditions of exploitation may change: because of the
different excavation environment, because of the
different operating mode of the bucket-wheel excavator
(vertical or horizontal cutting) and because of the way
of handling the bucket-wheel excavator. Figure 7 shows
that crack growth rate decreases with time. With the
increase of N the value of a/N, which responds to the
biggest length a, decreases.
158
(9)
(10)
(11)
(12)
(7)
(8)
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
Figure 13. Probability of failure of welded joints with a
crack at the bucket-wheel boom
3. CONCLUSION
REFERENCES
160
Mariusz Staco
PhD
Wroclaw University of Technology, Poland
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering
Damian Pietrusiak
MSc
Wroclaw University of Technology, Poland
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering
Large diameter slewing bearings used in open cast machines are made of
unhardened raceways. As a consequence the major wear is caused by the
plastic deformations. Loads acting on the rolling elements of the bearing
depend on the load transferred though the bearing itself and on the
superstructure and undercarriage components stiffness.
As a consequence of the plastic wear, the load distribution in the bearing is
changing. The object of investigations was slewing bearing of the stackerreclaimer LZKS 1600 which operates on the coal homogenization yard in
open cast mine Belchatow, Poland. Numerical and experimental research
were carried out in purpose to determine the influence of the
superstructure and undercarriage stiffness on the ball loads in the new
bearing after short operation time. Moreover, the load distribution in
terms of plastic wear was determined.
Keywords: slewing bearing, load distribution, plastic wear, surface mining
machines, FEM.
1. INTRODUCTION
2. INVESTIGATED OBJECT
161
3. MEASUREMENT METHODOLOGY
Table 1. Sensors angular location
162
Table 2. Number of the balls transferring the lad, average ball load for the three positions in full rotation new bearing
Gauge no
Superstructure
position
Number of balls
transferring the load
down
horizontal
up
down
1. (2D)
2. (3D1)
3. (3D2)
4. (4D)
11
11
5
2
13
13
8
9
2
3
8
19,3
23,4
3,0
0,7
5. (2G)
6. (3G1)
7. (3G2)
8. (5G)
11
10
11
7
3
13
9
4
1
13
7,1
10,8
17,2
horizontal
up
Undercarriage
11,7
10,9
3,4
14,5
11,6
15,2
12,5
Superstructure
6,9
2,4
5,8
1,1
20,9
7,4
9,7
down
horizontal
up
down
horizontal
up
3,3
0,5
0,2
0,5
2,6
0,6
0,6
0,5
0,1
5,8
0,4
11,6
8,8
1,4
0,6
7,7
4,0
6,1
6,3
1,8
8,6
5,1
2,1
2,1
4,5
0,7
0,6
9,1
0,5
0,6
1,1
0,6
4,1
7,2
12,3
4,7
3,0
13,4
3,8
1,5
1,1
5,2
163
6. RESULTS OF FEA
F ,
2
Ed
Cd
(1)
164
7. CONCLUSION
165
166
Janko Jancevski
Ph.D. Professor
University Sts.Cyril and Methodius
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering
Skopje, R.Macedonia
This This pper has as its goal to illustrate the possibility and capability of
the method "TRET", which is intended for analysis of the multi-body
mechanisms. This computer based methodology has considerably different
calculation approach vis-a-vis traditional methods in mechanics.
Many mechanical systems have a task to accomplish some particular
trajectories in the working process. Every trajectory is consisted of many
position points, which should be touched by the mechanism during the
motion. The examples presented in this article are actually visual computer
simulations of the bucket hydraulic excavators or loaders with buckets or
grapples. The animation on the screen gives confirmation that the
projected trajectory is performed. Trajectories can be assigned with
several subsequent position points in these cases: translation, rotation or
combined motion of some element (part) of the working mechanism. All
trajectories are consisted of many points placed on a straight or curved
line parts.
Keywords : Trajectory, excavators, loaders, computer simulation,
positions, mechanisms, robots
1. INTRODUCTION
167
168
169
170
OPTIMIZATION OF CONSTRUCTION
EQUIPMENT SELECTION BY
APPLYING AHP METHOD
Construction equipment has a great impact on the overall cost of
construction projects. Therefore, careful planning and selection of
appropriate combination of equipment is essential for the economic
success of the contractor. In practice, the process of equipment selection is
mainly based on manufacturers recommendations and the contractors
intuition without using any scientifically based method.
This paper discusses a model for selection of an optimal set of construction
machines by applying the multi criterion AHP method. The model is based
on comparison of alternative sets using the selected criteria functions
which are defined by the user at the start of each optimization. The
proposed method has been successfully tested on a case of construction of
embankment on a highway section on Corridor X in Serbia. The criteria
functions were: output, unit price and profit per unit. A sensitivity analysis
was also performed to check the stability of the final decision.
Keywords: construction equipment, optimization, AHP method, CESAD
1. INTRODUCTION
171
criteria and sub criteria are on the middle levels and the
alternatives are on the bottom level. At each hierarchical
level, the decision-maker benchmarks elements in pairs,
considering the element at a higher level, using socalled Saaty scale. The results of comparisons are
vectors of relative importance (priority) of criteria and
alternatives for achieving the goal.
The central issue in the evaluation of elements, when
applying AHP method, are the matrix of comparison.
The first step is the transformation from the semantic
values of the mutual importance of the compared
elements given by the decision-maker into numeric
values. The second step is creating the matrix of
comparison.
2. THE MATHEMATICAL BASIS OF AHP METHOD
n n 1
2
172
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
S , , , , , , , ,1, 2,3, 4,5, 6, 7,8,9
9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2
Results of comparison of elements at one level of the
hierarchy are stored in the comparison matrix A, where
aij is the ratio of the element i and the element j. If there
are n elements, the comparison matrix is the dimension
n x n. To preserve the consistency of reasoning, the
elements aji have the reciprocal value of the appropriate
element aij and diagonal matrix elements are equal to 1.
Intensity
1
Definition
Equal
importance
Weak
dominance
Strong
dominance
Very strong
dominance
Absolute
dominance
2,4,6,8
Intermediate
Values
Explanation
Two factors contribute
equally to the goal
Experience and judgement
slightly favour one over
the other.
Experience and judgement
strongly favour one over
the other
Experience and judgement
very strongly favour one
over the other.
Its importance is
demonstrated in practice.
The evidence favouring one
over the other is of the
highest possible validity.
When compromise is
needed
wn / w1
w1 / w2
w2 / w2
...
wn / w2
w1 / wn a11
... w2 / wn a21
...
... ...
... wn / wn an1
...
a12
a22
...
an 2
... a1n
... a2 n
... ...
... ann
Criterion1:
PRODUCTION(OUTPUT)
Criterion2:
PROFITPERUNIT
Criterion3:
PRICEPERUNIT
Alternative
Alternative
Alternative
Alternative
Alternative
Alternative
Alternative
Alternative
Alternative
Comb.
Output
[m3/h]
Price/unit
[/m3]
Profit/unit
[/m3]
1057
113,46
6,77
1,56
1070
113,46
6,77
1,56
1073
142,58
6,78
1,56
2016
104,27
9,25
2,13
2017
122,28
9,24
2,13
2025
142,13
9,22
2,12
2418
170,8
7,80
1,80
2417
171,25
7,73
1,78
2416
146,54
7,72
1,78
Average
136,31
7,92
1,82
Standard deviation
Standard Deviation/
Average
24,64
1,07
0,25
17%
13%
13%
173
2
1
1
3
1/7
1/7
1
4
2
1/3
7
1
5
1/3
1/3
4
1/5
1
6
1/7
1/7
1/2
1/9
1/6
1
7
1/9
1/9
1/6
1/9
1/9
1/6
1
8
1/9
1/9
1/7
1/9
1/9
1/6
1
1
9
1/7
1/7
1
1/8
1/5
1
6
6
1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
174
2
1
1
3
1/4
1/4
1
4
1
1/2
4
1
5
1/2
1/2
2
1/3
1
6
1/5
1/5
1
1/6
1/4
1
7
1/7
1/7
1/4
1/8
1/6
1/4
1
8
1/7
1/7
1/4
1/8
1/6
1/4
1
1
9
1/4
1/4
1
1/5
1/3
1
3
3
1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
176
D. Janoevi
Full Professor
University of Nis
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering
V. Nikoli
Teaching Assistant
University of Nis
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering
N. Petrovi
Teaching Assistant
University of Nis
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering
1. INTRODUCTION
a)
6.1
DL
5
W
M2r
O2
L5
F2a
rw
2
L2
z5
F2r
Wz
L1
7.2
Wxy
Ow
x5
Wxy
Wy
Ow
m5
x4
w
Wx
x5
177
178
(3)
W Wxy cos w i Wxy sin w j Wz k
(4)
m g L
o
4 xw
(5)
F2 W g mi j g mci j gmz j
i 2
(6)
i 3
M2 ((rw r2 ) W ) g mi ((rti r2 ) j ) gmz ((rt5 r2 ) j )
i 2
5 n m
n m
(7)
g ci ci ((rci1 r2 ) j ) g ci ci ((rci2 r2 ) j )
2
2
i3
i 3
(8)
F2 y F2 j ,
M2y M2 j
F2 z F2 k ,
M 2z M 2 k
2
2x
F2r/F
(9)
0,5
M 22z
0,5
(10)
(11)
fR
>2
4. SELECTION OF BEARING
F2r/F
(12)
(13)
2 M 2r
F2 a DL
(15)
(16)
Fed f L
pi F2kai
k
i 1
100
(19)
(18)
M ed f L
pi M 2kri
k
i 1
100
(20)
N
30000
(21)
179
1400
Mes
[kNm]
2000
a)
b)
Mes
[kNm]
1800
1200
III
1600
II
1400
1200
1000
800
III
II
I
1000
600
800
600
400
400
200
200
Fes[kN]
Fes[kN]
0
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
Fig. 3 Spectrums of load axial bearing slewing platform of hydraulic excavators equipped in-depth manipulator:
) mass 26000 kg and b) mass 58000 kg.
180
5. CONCLUSION
[1] , .,
, ,
, 1997.
[2] , ., , .,
: -
, XIII , ,
1994.
[3] ,
.,
,
, 2006.
[4] Slewing rings, INA Walzlager Schaeffler KG, catalogue 403, 2002.
[5] Kugel-Drehverbindungen, Hoesch Rothe ErdeSchmiedag AG, katalog, 2006.
1. INTRODUCTION
(a)
(b)
Figure 1. a) Concrete mixer with gravitational and forced action: 1 - mixer frame; 2 - drum; 3 - shaft; 4 - shaft vane; 5 - corpus
vane; 6 - bearing; 7 - bearing supports; 8 - coupling; 9 - worm reductor; 10 - belt drive; 11 - electromotor; 12 - chain wheel
gear; 13 - port for loading and unloading; b) Concrete mixer with gravitational and forced action - appearance
E-mail: aanishenko87@mas.bg.ac.rs
181
2. MATHEMATICAL MODEL
a e t b e t c sin t d cos t l ;
1
a
b
(1)
A f B ;
f A B ; l r D;
d
0
2 2 (1 f 2 )
2 2 (1 f 2 )
1 ( f 1 f 2 ) ; 2 ( f 1 f 2 ) ;
A g
sin( 0 ) ;
cos( 0 ) .
cos( 0 ) ;
D
Bg
cos
cos
cos
a2
b2
c2
( f A B ) 4 ( A f B ) r0 4 D
2 2 (1 f 2 )(4 3 )
4 3
( A f B) ( f A B) 3 r0 3 D ;
4 3
2 2 (1 f 2 )(4 3 )
;
(2)
2
A f B ;
;
f A B ;
p
p
d2
3 2 ;
2
2
2
2
2 (1 f )
2 (1 f )
2
2
p
;
p
4 2 ;
2
2
182
p 2 f k0 ;
r12 .
R12
(3)
( f A B ) 2 ( A f B) r0 2 D ;
2 1
2 2 (1 f 2 )( 2 1 )
( A f B ) ( f A B ) 1 r0 1 D ;
2 2 (1 f 2 )(2 1 )
2 1
2
2
V V
V
R 1
2
2
2
md 2 x
; md y mg ; d x 0 ; d y g .
0
dt 2
dt 2
dt 2
dt 2
(4)
dx
C1 for starting conditions:
dt
t=0;
dx
V cos . C1 V cos .
dt
x V t cos ; y V t sin
gt 2 . (5)
2
2
(1)
r1 1 / 2
V 1 R1 (1 R 2 ) ;
1
( 2)
( 2)
y2 (t ) V
t sin 2 ; x2 (t ) V
t cos 2 ;
2
( 2)
r2 1 / 2
V 2 R2 (1 R 2 ) ;
2
(6)
(7)
n.. 2 n.. (1 2 )
(8)
n . . n . .
(1 2 )
(9)
2
4
(10)
Figure 3. Forces acting on the concrete particle which is displaced along the vane having regular form
Figure 4. Determination of particles path after falling from the drum vane
183
3. CONCLUSION
[3]
[1]
[2]
, . ., , . ., , .
., , ..: Analysis of the operation
of concrete mixer with gravitational and forced
action, Proceedings HEAVY MACHINERY
HM 2011 - The seventh international triennial
conference: - Kraljevo Serbia Session B, pp. 1114, 2011.
, . ., , .., ,
..: Determination of motion model of concrete
particles with gravitational and forced action
(
),
. , , .
. 62, pp. 193-198, 2011.
184
[4]
[5]
,
. , ,
. . 51, pp. 258-262, 2009.
. ., . ., .
.: Characteristics of working process of the
concrete mixer with gravitational and forced action
(
- ). , . 52,
: , pp. 317-325, 2009.
.., .., ..:
Determination of distance between vanes of rotary
shaft (
), .
, , . . 57, pp.
439-443, 2010.
Mitrovic M. Bojan
M.Sc. Student
University of Belgrade
Faculty of Forestry
Danilovic N. Milorad
Asociate Professor
University of Belgrade
Faculty of Forestry
1. INTRODUCTION
225 and 685 and the year latter additional 2.41 km to the
altitude 1059. During the third phase in 1911 it was
extended with additional 2.8 km to the altitude 1430 and
in the final phase in 1913 with additional 1.16 km to the
altitude 1150. At the end it was a 9.970 km long
stationary skyline with four cables and with a automatic
regulation of the tension force in the skyline depending
of the load weight. The skyline cable was a 40 mm steel
cable for 2000 kg load mass and 15 m load length. Daily
capacity was about 250 m3 and yearly 24000 m3 was
transported. After that time the usage of the skylines is
completely neglected and today there is almost no
experience about skyline logging.
In the other European countries, at the beginning of
application, the increased use of forest skylines was
noted. A more intensive use occured after the First
World War in mountain regions of: Italy, France,
Austria and Switzerland [18]. Latter on, the high wood
extraction costs of skyline are less favored than the
other transportation equipment, particularly tractors,
which significantly decreased use of skylines. The
introduction of hydraulic drives and mobile systems
during the 1970s contributed to their widespread use
again [9].
The analysis of costs and productivity of the Koller
K300 skyline, in Austria in the period of 12 years
(1986-1998) has shown that the working cost is 20.23
EURO/pmh [8]. The cable system consisted of one
yarder, one tractor and a crew of three members. The
percentage distribution of costs was as follows: (32%) is
related to the wire ropes, (25%) is related to winches.
The remaining 43% of costs were related to the engine,
gears and tower (17%), the carriage (14%), and
miscellaneous items (12%). In general, total
transportation costs could be two to three times more
expensive, compared to ground systems and vary from
case to case. As a rule of thumb, there should be at least
1m3 of wood per one meter of skyline to make the
operation economically viable. Planning and
organization of the cable system wood extraction must
be thorough and serious and nothing can be overlooked.
[4],[7], [13] and [16].
185
186
load weight.
187
Standing skyline
Live skyline
Running skyline
Figure 3. Tree basic types of the skyline systems
Figure 4. Carriages classification [7]
3.1 Yarders
4. MODERN SKYLINE SYSTEMS
188
189
190
Dr Miroslav M. Stanojevic
Professor
University of Belgrade
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering
1. INTRODUCTION
191
Drum chippers are an older construction, (Figure 2 b) suitable for chipping both whole trees and forest
residues. They use a rotating drum with a diameter of
about 450-1800 mm in which the knives are inserted in
2 to 4 longitudinal grooves. Drum chippers require more
power than disc chippers. Drum chippers can be
attached to tractors with more than 100kW of power and
can also be attached or mounted onto forwarders and
lorries. Drum chippers are less sensitive to the
heterogeneity of the wood waste and they are suitable
for processing waste from primary and final wood
processing and also for forest residues.
The third type of wood chippers is rarely used for
the processing the forest residuals and is out of the
scope of this analysis.
a)
b)
192
Chipper tech.
characteristics
105X/ZX
Max. diameter
12
of the trunk (cm)
Diameter of the
600
cutting disc (mm)
Chip granulation
Up to 25
(mm)
Productivity
5-6
(m3/h)
Engine type and 1) Diesel;
power (kW)
14,7
2) Petrol/gas;
9,5 and 14,7
Dimensions
3080
(length x width) x1460/1630
(mm)
x1120
Mass (kg)
650-750
Price (U)
Type
200MX/ZX
350EX
14
30
660
800
Up to 30
Up to
33
Up to 8
12-13
Diesel;
16 and 21
Diesel;
35,8
and 44
3440 x1600
980
25000/15000 29000/18000
3340
x1995
17101740
43000
Characteristic
Maximal
diameter of the
trunk (cm)
Diameter of
wood chips (mm)
Productivity
(m3/h)
Required tractor
power (kW)
Crane
Price (EURO)
do 30
27-36
15-40
15-30
do 40
20-30
18-30
20-25
130-220
150
75-140
Yes
167000
No
116000
Yes
130000
193
194
SESSION C
LOGISTICS AND INTRALOGISTICS
SYSTEMS
1. INTRODUCTION
195
196
Squared Coefficient
of Variation
0,5
3,8
unimportant (2)
Influencing Factors
Costs (of the charge
carrier itself)
Costs (capital lockup
of materials in the
charge carrier)
Costs (goods exit)
Costs of handling
(packing)
Costs of handling
(storage or decollating)
Costs (disposal,
cleaning)
Costs (internal
transport)
Costs (space at
warehouse/assembly)
neutral (3)
Importance
Mean
important (4)
2 2,0
1,5
1 2,7
0,7
1 3,5
0,8
3,5
0,6
1 3,2
0,7
2 2,5 0,5
1 2,9
0,8
4,0
0,3
Lifetime
Mean
Squared Coefficient of
Variation
5,0
0,0
3,9
0,5
1 3,6
0,8
5 1,5 0,5
4,6
0,1
1 2,9
0,8
4,0
0,0
unimportant (2)
neutral (3)
Influencing Factors
Quality (avoidance of
damages)
Flexibility
(rearrangement of the
production line)
Flexibility (suitable
for different products
or parts)
Ergonomics (e.g.
weight)
Recycling
important (4)
Importance
197
OPO j
TCO j
(1)
j 1
mS
Where:
- OTQj = use-cost-ratio of charge carrier j
- TCOj = TCO-value of charge carrier j
- OPOj = Overall-Profit-of-Ownership-value of charge
carrier j
n
TCO
j 1
198
RS
VE P
24
(2)
(3)
m B mS
mP ,N
(4)
Where:
- mPLT = parts per charge carrier
- mLt,Lg = charge carriers per layer
- mLg,Pl = layers per pallet
Now, it is possible to calculate the resulting
inventory costs, KBs, as:
K Bs
t
* m B *WP * z
365
(5)
Where:
- t = review period [d]
- WP = price of product []
- z = interest on fixed-capital [%/a]
k
mB
* LLE * BLE * t * Bm, m , day
mP , N
1000000
(6)
Where:
- LLE = length of stored unit [mm]
- BLE = width of stored unit [mm]
- kBm,m,day = storage cost rate [/m*d]
k
mB
* LLE * BLE * t * Fl , m , day
1000000
mP , N
(8)
Where:
- tin/out = time for storage or retrieval [min]
- kPer,h = personal expenditure rate [/h]
Finally, the total costs for the basic process step
storing, KStoring, can be calculated by summing up all
these partial costs as done in the following formula (9):
K Storing K Bs K Bm K FL K Per
k
mB
* LLE * BLE * t * Bm, m , day +
mP , N
1000000
k
VE
t
t * P * mLg , Pl * mLt , Pl * Pick * Bm, Pick , h (11)
mP , N
60 1000000
K Fl
k
mB
* LLE * BLE * t * Fl , m , day
mP , N
1000000
K Per t *
(12)
K Pick K Bs K Bm K FL K Per
(14)
6. CONCLUSION
VE P 2 * t in / out
*
* k Per ,h
mP , N
60
(10)
(7)
Where:
- LLE = length of stored unit [mm]
- BLE = width of stored unit [mm]
- kFl,m,day = area and space costs rate [/m*d]
K Per t *
t
* m B *WP * z
365
Where:
- tPick = picking time [min]
- kBm,Pick,h = operating resource for picking rate
[/h]
K Fl
K Bs
K Bm
K Bm
(9)
199
200
RS = stock reach
VEp = daily consumption
mPLT = parts per charge carrier
mLt,Lg = charge carriers per layer
mLg,Pl = layers per pallet
KBs = inventory costs
KBm = operating resources costs
t = review period [d]
WP = price of product []
z = interest on fixed-capital [%/a]
LLE = length of stored unit [mm]
BLE = width of stored unit [mm]
kBm,m,day = storage cost rate [/m*d]
KFl = area and space costs
kFl,m,day = area and space costs rate [/m*d]
KPer = personal expenditures
tin/out = time for storage or retrieval [min]
kPer,h = personal expenditure rate [/h]
KStoring = total costs for storing
tPick = picking time [min]
kBm,Pick,h = operating resource for picking rate [/h]
KPick = total costs for picking
Kathrin Breiner
Master Student
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT)
Institute for material handling and logistics
1. INTRODUCTION
201
202
204
Christian Tesch
Research Assistant
TU Dortmund University
Institute of Transport Logistics
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering
1. INTRODUCTION
206
207
208
1. INTRODUCTION
209
motor
drivetrain
conveying
units
Number of
boxes (#)
0%
(x)
50%
(x)
100%
(x)
(x)
(x)
(x)
212
Results show that the used gear motor has a very bad
overall efficiency. Depending on the load, there is an
efficiency of 20-42%.
On one hand, this can be explained by the low
efficiency of the worm drive of approx. 0,7-0,8 [3],
which is part of the gear motor. On the other hand, the
asynchronous motor runs far below his nominal load,
which means far outside his optimum efficiency range.
Here, the fact comes up that asynchronous motors of
smaller nominal power have a lower efficiency ( =
f(Pn)) [4] than motors of higher nominal power.
Figure 14. Life cycle costs for different motor types [4]
It is to aim to replace existing drives with new highefficiency-drives. Additional discussions have to
consider saving potentials in relation to optimized
controlled operation modes. Application of frequency
converters e.g. supports optimized speed, considering
the current throughput-needs.
Clear energy-efficiency ratings in general need
benchmark and indicator specifications, which are
currently not available compare [6]. That is another
heavy work package of the research project effMFS.
Next chapter illustrates an overall draft and some
specifics for energy-efficiency-indicators of conveyors.
4. ENERGY EFFICIENCY INDICATORS (EEI)
213
214
Miel Radosavac
Research Associate
Leibniz Universitt Hannover
Institute of Transport and
Automation Technology
Tobias Krhn
Research Associate
Leibniz Universitt Hannover
Institute of Transport and
Automation Technology
Ludger Overmeyer
Affiliatiate Professor
Leibniz Universitt Hannover
Institute of Transport and
Automation Technology
1. INTRODUCTION
Whereas for conventional conveyors only few elementary logistic operations are possible, the Cognitive
Conveyor allows thanks to its unidirectional functionali215
Sensor
(optical)
Mechanical
Connector
Communication
Interface
Tilting
Drive
Drive
Base
plate
Figure 4. Prototype of the Cognitive Conveyor
216
Finally, the control unit to process and execute information is located in the lower part of the module,
surrounded by the body case. All module components
are connected to the respective circuit board with a
microcontroller. Therein tasks like motor control, communication with other modules, sensor detection and
application of the routing algorithm (section 3) are
planned and processed. Thus, the flexibility and the
modular concept of the single module are underlined.
3. ROUTING
With
217
The route reservation starts after a transport unit enters the Cognitive Conveyor. An arbitrary module beneath the transport unit starts the reservation and informs the neighbor with the best metric, so that it must
continue the route planning. That neighbor in turn informs its neighbor with the best metric and so on.
Hence, a route reservation runs from the transport unit
to the destination. Each route segment starts with the
state planned. After the route reaches the destination,
the target module confirms the route. This confirmation
propagates the route backwards and changes the state of
each module from planned to reserved. After the whole
route is reserved, the transport unit starts moving
through the system. Before a route segment changes its
state from planned to reserved, the following conditions
must be met:
The further processing of the transport unit is encapsulated and completely hidden to the environment.
218
4. APPLICATION SCENARIO
5. CONCLUSION
The subject of the presented work was the development of a scalable Cognitive Conveyor for material
handling purposes. For increasing the overall flexibility
of a material handling system, small modules are used
that are identical in construction and therefore interchangeable. The modules have a smaller geometrical
dimension concerning the bearing area than the transport unit, which has to be transported. Moreover, transportation in every possible direction is possible. The
combination of several modules allows the execution of
different logistic operations like distributing, piling-up,
merging, separating, sorting, aligning, transporting,
rotating or buffering. By comparison with centrally
controlled architectures, the whole transportation task is
distributed to single conveyor modules, which are
equipped with an intelligent embedded controller.
To prove the functionality a prototypical model
based on a drive with a rotatable and tilting disc was
built up. Elementary components of the modules are:
the optical sensor to detect objects, the communication
interface for data transfer between single modules, the
mechanical connectors for the proper geometrical
alignment, the electrical supply through the base plate,
the body case and the control unit, which is responsible
for data processing and executing.
Due to the different possible logistic operations,
which can be performed, an appropriate algorithm for
routing is necessary. Known routing algorithms focus
on packets, which only occupy one node at a time. As
consequence an algorithm for the Cognitive Conveyor
was developed, which uses a distance vector routing
metric with split-horizon and temporarily locked dependencies. This method is proven to be loop-free and
quickly converging.
For the evaluation of the Cognitive Conveyor currently an application scenario that is characterized by
handling transport units, is being built up within the
research project CogniLog (Cognitive Logistic Networks) in cooperation with different industrial partners.
Therein the Cognitive Conveyor is integrated in a conveyor system. Evaluation criteria will be the comparison
of aspects like throughput, routing, reaction and reconfiguration.
Aim of our future research is the validation of the
presented conveyor in a real scenario under real conditions. Therein, the functionality of the routing algorithms and the steadiness of the conveyor are an important aspect. Another scope is the appropriate design of
whole conveyor systems, because the use of the Cognitive Conveyor only makes sense in specific areas, the
so-called highly functional logistic nodes, where additional logistic functions are required.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
This contribution was supported by the German federal state of Lower Saxony with funds of the European
Regional Development Fund (ERDF) within the scope
of the research project Cognitive Logistic Networks
(CogniLog).
219
220
Momilo S. orevi
Serbian Armed Forces
Nenad . Zrnic
Assistant Professor
University of Belgrade
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering
Mili R. Milievi
Assistant Professor
Military Academy
Ministry of Defense, Belgrade
Vasilije V. Mikovi
Assistant Professor
Military Academy
Ministry of Defense, Belgrade
1. INTRODUCTION
levels
Production
Domestic
market
Foreign
market
Regeneration
User
warehouses
Central
storehouse
Depot
warehouses
3rd level
of supply
222
End-users
User
warehouses
Management
Unrepaired
parts
Central
storehouse
High Level
Management
Regeneration
Workshops
Information flow
Material flow
Return parts flow
Unrepaired parts flow
223
224
- The total costs are very similar for all three types of
flows of repaired parts, with all combinations of
inventory levels. That means that the graphical
representation is unclear. However, it is observed
that the total cost increases linearly with the
increase of intensity of demand at all variants and
combinations of inventory levels. However, there is
a significant difference in cost between the first and
the third variant in favor of the first option (back
into users warehouses), and between the second and
the third variant in favor of the second option (back
into central storehouse).
The obtained results will be considered as
hierarchically structured criteria, or the criteria with
level of significance. The most important criterion is
assigned to load factor users warehouses, then the
middle time of waiting in line, then the total costs of the
system. The reason why the total costs are just in third
place is a little difference between the costs per variants.
In this situation, the costs are difficult to use as an
important criterion for the formation of decision tables.
The next step is to select an optimum variant, which
given the conditions provides the best characteristic of
the functioning of the system. We will continue to use
defined characteristics.
The obtained results are the basis for creation of
tables of decision. Firstly, it is observed the load factor
for defined variants in the conditions of a certain level
of inventory in the central storehouse and users
warehouses and on intensity of demand. When a variant
is much more important than the other one, it gets the
lead. In a situation concurrently results (the
uncertainty), the following characteristics by relevance
is introduced middle time waiting in line, and total
costs at the end.
Table 1. Decision table for variants of sending repairable
parts
Level of
inventory in
central storehouse
S2
Low level
Medium level
High level
Level of
inventory in
users warehouse
S1
Low
Medium
Low level
V2
V2
High
V1
Medium level
V1
V1
V1
High level
V3
V1
V1
Low level
V2
V3
V1
Medium level
V1
V1
V1
High level
V3
V3
V1
Low level
V3
V3
V1
Medium level
V1
V1
V1
High level
V3
V1
V3
r
intervvals,
seasonal chaanges. During the year, at regular
alternating there
t
are chhanges of sm
mall, large and
medium-inteensity demandds. Now streaam of requesst is
described byy normal probaability distribuution.
Experimeents are perfformed with set the systtem
parameters, determine thhe sending system variaants,
define valuess the probabillity of sendingg parts for reppair
and repair prrobability. That is to determ
mine the criterrion
value of thee first three versions of sending
s
repaiired
parts. The sim
mulation goess on for 31 yeears; the first year
y
is not takenn when calcullating the outtput values. The
T
simulation iss carried out inn two passes. Firstly, whenn all
users warehhouses have the
t same leveel of intensityy of
demand and secondly, whhen the user warehouses
w
h
have
T
mutually diffferent levels of intensity of demand. The
option of seending repaireed parts is deetermined durring
the executioon of simulation based onn the rules frrom
decision tabbles for an experiment
e
too determine the
criterion valuue of fourth vaariant.
In experim
ments we obtaained new feaatures that will be
monitored and
a
analyzed as follows: middle levell of
inventories in
i the centrall storehouse (Y
( C) and midddle
level of invventories in the
t
whole syystem (YS). The
T
reason for annalyzing the newly
n
introduuced parameteer is
estimated staability functioon model. Thee obtained vallues
in the first paass will be coompared with the results off the
second pass. The analysis only show
wed the slighhtest
fo the middlee time waitingg in
deviation values except for
f
variant sending repaiir parts.
line, for the fourth
To furtheer exploration it is used obttained data in the
first pass. Acccording to reesults it can be
b concluded the
following:
v
V2, inntermediate levvels of inventtory
- For the variant
in a cenntral storehouuse and interm
mediate levelss of
inventorry in the systeem are the sm
mallest, but total
costs arre the higheest at the saame time. Low
L
intermeddiate level of inventory in the
t system is the
result off low stock levvels in users warehouses,
w
a is
as
expectedd. That is ressult of sendinng parts into the
central storehouse.
s
A very importaant feature is that
t
the low
west load facttor of users warehouses for
variant V2.
- The highest load facctor of users warehouses and
me waiting in line
l
is for variant
the loweest middle tim
V4, wheen regenerateed parts referr to the ruless in
decisionn table. Then is also relativvely low averrage
total coost of the syystem. Interm
mediate level of
inventorry in central sttorehouse is thhe largest andd an
intermeddiate level of inventory
i
in the
t system is also
a
high.
r
is to determine orrder
The finall step of the research
of defined variants by determinationn the values of
m
is givenn in Table 2.
criteria weighhts. Starting matrix
Today, there
t
are seeveral methoods for solvving
problem withh multi-attribbute decision making methhods
such as AH
HP, PROMETHEE, ELEC
CTRE, VIKO
OR,
MENOR, LINMAP, etc.. Each method has its own
o
characteristiccs and speciffic requiremeents in termss of
defining the parameters of
o the model. In this paperr, in
order to deteermine the besst variation it is used Analyytic
Hierarchy Prrocess methodd (AHP).
Load factor of
users storehouse
Kp
Total costs
Lg
Middle time
waiting in line
W
V1
0.9658
3.783.727
2.654
V2
0.8899
3.889.245
2.895
V3
0.9262
3.834.639
3.464
V4
0.9664
3.804.817
1.840
W
Weight
factor Wj
1.5
max/min
max
min
min
V
Variants
The Optimum
m Solution
Load factor of
users warehouuses
KP
Variant V1
Total cossts LG
Variant V2
Variant V3
Meaan time
waitinng in line
W
Variant V4
Fig
gure 4. The criterions and alte
ernatives by AHP
A
Fig
gure 5. The ran
nk of variants b
by AHP
225
226
1. INTRODUCTION
Correspondence to:
Dr Zoran Marinkovi, full professor
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering,
A. Medvedeva 14, 18000 Ni, Serbia
E-mail: zoranm@masfak.ni.ac.rs
Figure 2. Layout of the free zone Pirot
227
Warehouse properties
Total area
Commissioning area
Operative surface
Total office surface
Forklifts
Manual forklifts
Palletizers
Roller transporters
Loading/unloading decks
Employees
Racks
Pallet slots
Rack cranes (I var) or
telescopic forklifts (II var)
Total number of pallets - capacity
3808
3400
st
Figure 3. 3D design of the public warehouse of logistic center Pirot for the 1 variant with high rack cranes
228
I var.
II var.
3000 m2
1200 m2
1800 m2
200 m2
4
4
5
41
8
5
20
34
1904
1700
2
2
nd
Figure 4. 3D design of the public warehouse of logistic center Pirot for the 2 variant with telescopic forklifts
(1)
(2)
0,29 min
0,43 min
0,43 min
0,012 min/m
0,008 min/m
0,18 min
drives
the pallet
drops
the
pallet
returns to
the original
position
For the specific task, the time required for the forklift to
perform this operation for a single pallet is 0.98 min. Using
this information as well as the annual turnover of the
warehouse, which is additionally augmented by 20%, it is a
straightforward task to compute the time necessary to store
all the pallets in the warehouse (GOD):
GOD 1.2 t ms GOP ,
(3)
where:
GOP the annual turnover of
(the total number of pallets).
the
warehouse
229
N v t ms tis t g
(4)
(5)
(6)
where:
tZN
tU
tV1,2
to
230
(7)
Nenad P. Bjeli
Research and Teaching Assistant University
of Belgrade
Faculty of Transport and Traffic Engineering
Gordana M. Radivojevi
Associate Professor
University of Belgrade
Institute Mihajlo Pupin
Draen M. Popovi
Research and Teaching Assistant University
of Belgrade
Faculty of Transport and Traffic Engineering
Branislava V. Ratkovi
Research and Teaching Assistant University
of Belgrade
Faculty of Transport and Traffic Engineering
1. INTRODUCTION
231
232
VND).
However,
determination of the number of implemented structures,
as well as order in which structure are explored is one of
the objectives of this research. Considered relationships
between structures are explained in more details in the
next section.
The same set of neighborhood structures is used also
for the shaking procedure of the VNS algorithm.
However, in this case we considered use of only two
structures and implemented nested relationship between
structures. Nested neighborhood structures are formed
by four successive implementations of the implemented
moves.
The VNS algorithm stops after all nested initial
solution are examined without solution improvement.
As an initial solution of the algorithm we used
solution obtained by the reduced VNS (RVNS) [5] with
the same stopping criterion as in the VNS but with the
difference that in the RVNS sixteen nesting structures
are used for every implemented move.
4. COMPUTATIONAL EXPERIMENTS
233
234
Number
Instance MIQLP DAH Insertion
of Tasks
10
1 7.33 20.54 8.05
2 7.44 21.57 8.38
3 8.38 23.35 8.53
4 5.65 20.29 6.04
5 6.52 20.28 6.88
6 8.12 21.25 8.41
7 8.49 24.16 9.93
8 9.62 23.19 10.19
9 11.52 25.22 11.99
10 5.30 18.17 5.32
25
11 NA 39.34 20.58
12 NA 43.23 21.91
13 NA 30.62 17.23
14 NA 43.52 23.03
15 NA 28.47 14.85
16 NA 32.93 18.86
17 NA 39.58 20.16
18 NA 36.22 18.39
19 NA 37.42 16.31
20 NA 45.17 22.97
50
21 NA 59.29 43.61
22 NA 57.30 43.54
23 NA 59.50 46.26
24 NA 138.11 137.89
25 NA 246.68 235.54
26 NA 187.09 189.18
27 NA 161.19 156.36
28 NA 166.37 165.88
29 NA 161.24 155.01
30 NA 148.88 142.15
Average
66.00 53.11
VNS
1-1
7.34
7.44
8.40
5.66
6.52
8.15
8.51
9.63
11.56
5.32
19.85
20.66
17.09
22.16
13.91
18.28
19.21
17.24
14.96
22.36
43.03
42.15
45.24
55.28
55.25
42.31
44.40
46.24
51.15
46.02
24.51
VNS
1-2
7.62
7.48
8.43
5.81
6.55
8.54
8.75
9.64
11.92
5.46
19.97
20.93
17.36
23.05
14.06
18.27
19.22
17.55
15.27
22.50
43.21
42.14
45.33
55.67
59.90
43.04
44.66
46.70
52.63
46.99
24.96
VNS
1-3
7.52
7.46
8.39
5.73
6.54
8.31
8.56
9.66
11.53
5.33
20.40
21.25
17.20
22.62
13.91
18.28
19.23
17.37
15.15
22.52
43.63
42.56
45.47
58.53
62.05
44.36
45.43
49.42
53.66
51.53
25.45
VNS
1-4
7.49
7.44
8.41
5.70
6.52
8.28
8.64
9.67
11.80
5.38
19.85
20.65
17.12
22.27
14.07
18.31
19.21
17.22
14.96
22.52
43.11
42.14
45.21
55.51
58.75
42.53
44.30
46.69
51.62
46.59
24.73
VNS
2-1
7.33
7.44
8.38
5.65
6.52
8.12
8.51
9.62
11.52
5.30
19.84
20.65
17.07
22.15
13.85
18.27
19.21
17.22
14.94
22.31
43.01
42.14
45.21
55.08
55.44
42.34
44.06
45.87
51.16
45.28
24.45
VNS
2-2
7.43
7.44
8.38
5.69
6.52
8.26
8.49
9.69
11.52
5.30
19.84
20.65
17.07
22.21
13.83
18.27
19.21
17.22
15.07
22.40
43.01
42.14
45.21
55.47
58.01
42.78
44.27
46.79
51.84
45.24
24.64
VNS
2-3
7.34
7.49
8.40
5.69
6.56
8.23
8.51
9.67
11.53
5.37
20.01
21.00
17.08
22.47
13.97
18.29
19.22
17.25
15.04
22.43
43.60
42.49
45.57
58.29
61.27
43.78
46.80
50.51
54.20
51.74
25.46
VNS
2-4
7.36
7.44
8.38
5.72
6.52
8.33
8.54
9.63
11.54
5.30
19.84
20.65
17.07
22.15
13.84
18.27
19.21
17.22
14.95
22.31
43.01
42.14
45.20
55.72
58.17
42.34
44.07
46.01
51.23
45.69
24.59
Table 2. Standard deviation of objective function values of the TSPTR instances [h]
Number
Instance VNS 1-1 VNS 1-2 VNS 1-3 VNS 1-4 VNS 2-1 VNS 2-2 VNS 2-3 VNS 2-4
of Tasks
10
1 0.05
0.40
0.39
0.29
0.00
0.24
0.01
0.12
2 0.00
0.08
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.07
0.00
3 0.05
0.12
0.02
0.08
0.00
0.00
0.03
0.00
4 0.01
0.21
0.19
0.08
0.00
0.08
0.06
0.17
5 0.00
0.06
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.06
0.00
6 0.07
0.54
0.54
0.30
0.00
0.26
0.17
0.44
7 0.03
0.30
0.13
0.16
0.03
0.02
0.03
0.10
8 0.03
0.03
0.03
0.09
0.00
0.14
0.04
0.02
9 0.05
0.64
0.00
0.60
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.07
10 0.06
0.16
0.03
0.18
0.00
0.00
0.10
0.00
25
11 0.01
0.41
0.68
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.46
0.00
12 0.01
0.47
0.66
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.54
0.00
13 0.02
0.62
0.38
0.16
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
14 0.02
0.72
0.54
0.35
0.01
0.16
0.49
0.01
15 0.06
0.42
0.06
0.61
0.04
0.02
0.17
0.03
16 0.00
0.00
0.01
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
17 0.01
0.02
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
18 0.02
1.06
0.37
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.05
0.00
19 0.02
0.52
0.51
0.01
0.01
0.34
0.20
0.01
20 0.08
0.58
0.42
0.43
0.00
0.27
0.35
0.00
50
21 0.03
0.42
0.65
0.31
0.01
0.00
0.61
0.00
22 0.01
0.00
0.59
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.50
0.00
23 0.02
0.39
0.49
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.55
0.01
24 0.61
0.65
1.29
0.53
0.25
0.72
1.27
0.50
25 0.62
1.58
1.98
2.26
0.42
1.50
1.85
1.94
26 0.09
0.59
1.23
0.41
0.18
0.84
0.91
0.13
27 0.99
0.81
0.87
0.52
0.01
0.46
1.50
0.04
28 0.78
0.85
1.16
1.05
0.02
1.04
2.44
0.45
29 0.38
1.23
1.22
0.75
0.61
0.70
0.67
0.60
30 1.63
1.53
2.31
1.71
0.75
0.41
1.94
1.34
Average
0.19
0.51
0.56
0.37
0.24
0.50
0.20
0.08
235
Number of
Instance MIQLP
Tasks
10
1 2426.19
2 3161.33
3 2719.44
4 2804.20
5 1867.72
6 2191.50
7 4441.86
8 2840.05
9 3241.08
10 2914.75
25
11
NA
12
NA
13
NA
14
NA
15
NA
16
NA
17
NA
18
NA
19
NA
20
NA
50
21
NA
22
NA
23
NA
24
NA
25
NA
26
NA
27
NA
28
NA
29
NA
30
NA
Average
NA
236
DAH
Insertion
>0.01
>0.01
>0.01
>0.01
>0.01
>0.01
>0.01
>0.01
>0.01
>0.01
>0.01
>0.01
>0.01
>0.01
>0.01
>0.01
>0.01
>0.01
>0.01
>0.01
>0.01
>0.01
>0.01
>0.01
>0.01
>0.01
>0.01
>0.01
>0.01
>0.01
>0.01
0.01
>0.01
>0.01
>0.01
>0.01
>0.01
>0.01
>0.01
>0.01
>0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.06
0.06
0.06
0.08
0.08
0.08
0.07
0.08
0.08
0.08
0.03
VNS
1-1
0.30
0.21
0.17
0.21
0.22
0.23
0.23
0.27
0.38
0.22
5.52
10.58
9.27
8.90
5.44
8.22
6.93
6.55
7.59
6.38
146.25
212.21
167.52
192.19
289.62
194.95
168.86
175.58
258.22
195.76
69.30
VNS
1-2
0.40
0.35
0.30
0.34
0.46
0.54
0.44
0.40
0.42
0.36
12.02
12.69
9.86
14.72
12.14
10.26
12.60
11.89
12.20
9.59
205.64
191.26
251.58
344.92
419.85
301.47
194.32
308.59
265.44
249.68
95.16
VNS
1-3
0.38
0.28
0.25
0.25
0.29
0.33
0.35
0.35
0.33
0.31
6.27
7.12
7.40
7.07
6.80
7.71
6.42
8.92
7.02
6.76
112.85
122.04
125.56
120.92
132.58
134.38
134.82
125.84
151.41
156.52
46.38
VNS
1-4
0.45
0.37
0.50
0.36
0.47
0.49
0.46
0.41
0.70
0.42
10.75
13.40
8.68
13.20
13.71
9.47
8.92
12.39
9.85
18.29
189.76
237.73
212.91
271.48
397.14
256.99
246.58
208.22
292.46
251.22
89.59
VNS
2-1
0.30
0.27
0.26
0.26
0.23
0.26
0.29
0.31
0.35
0.25
9.82
9.12
9.08
10.89
9.90
8.73
10.50
10.22
11.58
11.36
221.14
300.09
236.69
224.78
313.02
223.79
200.45
215.51
246.69
266.70
85.09
VNS
2-2
0.46
0.48
0.41
0.43
0.39
0.45
0.47
0.49
0.60
0.35
12.21
12.55
13.55
16.87
12.50
12.61
11.40
14.92
14.36
15.31
209.07
268.15
295.50
319.91
440.69
343.71
311.41
298.06
349.08
369.87
111.54
VNS
2-3
0.38
0.27
0.26
0.30
0.21
0.28
0.30
0.29
0.33
0.22
8.98
7.25
6.29
6.97
6.21
7.07
7.22
7.13
7.84
6.72
103.00
106.64
105.31
155.78
127.81
135.28
111.45
123.52
130.33
160.36
44.47
VNS
2-4
0.49
0.39
0.45
0.42
0.41
0.50
0.65
0.56
0.58
0.50
9.65
16.12
11.07
13.59
11.39
11.48
11.55
14.91
10.36
13.60
210.76
205.15
310.76
314.23
384.39
327.02
261.63
252.14
302.80
301.42
99.96
Marco Dewitz
Research assistant Institute for
Materials Handling Material Flow Logistics
Technical University of Munich
Department Mechanical Engineering
Stefan Galka
Research assistant Institute for
Materials Handling Material Flow Logistics
Technical University of Munich
Department Mechanical Engineering
Willibald A. Gnthner
Professor Institute Institute for Materials
Handling Material Flow Logistics
Technical University of Munich
Department Mechanical Engineering
1. INTRODUCTION
237
WS 2
3
4
Material Source
3
43 14 4314 431 4 43 14
43 14 4314 431 4 43 14
43 14 4314 431 4 43 14
3
4
WS 3
3
4
WS 4
5
6
Em
mpties buffer
3
4
3
4
WS n
...
Production
upermarket
Su
inv
vestments andd elongates thee time necessaary for takingg
outt of stock annd supply. D
Due to this the
t
orderingg
serrvice for a tour
t
must be completed earlier,
e
whichh
leaads to an inncrease of thhe replacemen
nt time. Thee
rep
placement tim
me is definedd as the maaximum timee
bettween the reetrieval of m
material and a supply forr
pro
oduction. [4, pp.203] A lower replaacement timee
enaables the reduuction of stocks in production withoutt
deccreasing the suupply tact.
3. CONCEPT
WS 2
3
4
Material Source
3
43 14 4314 431 4 43 14
43 14 4314 431 4 43 14
43 14 4314 431 4 43 14
3
4
WS 3
3
4
WS 4
3
4
WS 3
3
4
WS 4
3
4
WS 3
3
4
WS 4
5
6
Em
mpties buffer
3
4
3
4
WS n
...
WS 1
WS 2
3
4
Production
Su
upermarket
System-Trray
Buffer
3
4 314 431 4 43 14 4 314
43 14 4314 431 4 43 14
43 14 4314 431 4 43 14
43 14 4314 431 4 43 14
P
5
Empties buffer
3
4
3
4
WS n
...
WS 1
WS 2
4
3
Production
Automated
Loading
Material Source
ASRS
c) Automated loadin
ng of system trays on chain
n conveyer
3
43 14 4314 431 4 43 14
43 14 4314 431 4 43 14
43 14 4314 431 4 43 14
Explanation
Empties buffer
3
4
3
4
WS n
...
Transport of em
mpties to empties buffer
Unloading of empties
e
of goods to production
Transport o
Retrieval
Provision at
a workstations / pick-up of em
mpties
nsportgeselle
Pufferung Tran
Production
Automated
Loading
Material Source
ASRS
d) Direct automated
d loading (Drive-Thru)
a the Institutee
A new conceept which wass developed at
forr Materials Handling,
H
Maaterial Flow and
a
Logisticss
(fm
ml) of the Technische
T
U
Universitt Mnchen
M
andd
anaalysed in a sim
mulation studdy can reduce the technicall
efffort in the prezone of the wareho
ouse withoutt
deccreasing the performance
p
of the STCs. The conceptt
intends an auttomised loadiing of the tugger trainss
hering to seqquence. Signiificant compo
onents of thee
adh
auttomatic loadinng of tugger ttrains are an ASRS
A
for thee
sto
ocking of maaterial as weell as materiials handlingg
tecchnology whicch leads the SL
LCs from the warehouse too
a loading stationn. The loadinng station itsellf is made upp
of loading shelvves and a techhnical appliance (e.g. smalll
w
sorts thee
staacker cranes orr hubben-staccker cranes) which
SL
LCs into the loading sheelves. With these
t
loadingg
sheelves the SLC
Cs are loaded into the transsport racks onn
thee tugger train. Both the loadding shelf and
d the transportt
fraame are flow racks.
r
The SLCs arre taken out off stock from th
he small partss
sto
ore, transporteed over the conveyors to
o the loadingg
staations sorted directly
d
into thhe loading sh
helves withoutt
intermediate stoorage (see figgure 2). Throu
ugh this new
w
ncept the last order service can be set tem
mporally veryy
con
clo
ose to the taking out of stocck and thus a fast supply iss
enaabled.
Figure 1. Diffe
erent concepts
s for the supply
y of SLC tugge
er
trains
2. AUTOMIS
SED LOADING OF TUGGE
ER TRAINS
238
Fig
gure 2. Loading
g station for the
e automatic loa
ading of
tug
gger trains
Utilization ASRS
100%
Start
Tour A1 W1
ASRS
Start
Start
Start
Tour A1 W1 Tour A1 W1 Tour A1 W1
A1W3
B1W3
t5
t6
t7
B0W4 A1W1 B1W1 A1W2 B1W2 A1W3 B1W3 A1W4 B1W4 A2W1 B2W1 A2W2
Loading station A
A0
A1
B0
Loading station B
A2
B1
B2
Start Tour A1
t0
t1
t2
t3
t4
t5
t6
t7
t8
t9
t1
t1
t1
Start Tour A1
Transport time for
SLCs from ASRS to
the loading station
Loading time
Start Tour B1
239
Impact on
x
o
o
x
y
z
+
o
To make the positioning in the direction of travel (xaxis) easier, several constructive measures were applied.
Crosswise, the shafts of the loading shelves are wider
than the shafts of the transport racks. Due to this the
position tolerance is enhanced if the SLCs are placed
centric in the shafts of the loading shelves. The trailer
couplings are without clearance and the transport racks
are positioned on the trailers using centering devices.
The positioning of the tugger train itself is done
manually by the driver. Therefore, a laser pointer is
mounted on the housing of the truck to project a
position mark. Combined with markings on the floor the
driver can see the ideal driveway and breakpoint.
For a correct transfer of goods the transfer gap in
which SLCs are not supported by rolls (lateral direction,
y-axis) must be minimized. To eliminate the influence
of the directional stability of the trailers and the
inaccuracy of a manual positioning the trailers are
restraint-guided by rolls mounted to the housing and a
separate guide rail.
The prototype tests have shown that offsets in height
direction are critical, especially when the flow planes of
the transport racks are higher as the loadings shelves.
Even small offsets lead to an interfering edge. As a
general tendency the planes of the flow racks should be
mounted slightly lower than the ones of the loading
shelves to prevent influences by the unevenness of the
floor or dirty wheels.
Last but not least, the selection of rolls in the
transport racks is very important. The use of roller
tracks simmilar to those in the loading shelves, which
grant the best rolling characterisics, is not possible. Due
to acceleration an vibrations the SLCs would damage
240
t
the drive-thrru concept inn contrast too the other two
concepts in which the SLCs
S
must bee handled tw
wice.
Furthermore,, the transportt racks are neever taken offf the
tugger train and now addiitional employyees or technnical
equipment arre required.
The duraation of all prrocess steps starting with the
retrieval in the
t ASRS until the SLCs / transport raacks
are completeely loaded onto
o
the tuggger train can be
described as technical leadd time (see figgure 5).
d tugger trainss
seeen in the decooupling between ASRS and
and
d the tugger trrains themselvves.
The absence of re-sequenccing steps forr SLCs causess
a tighter
t
couplinng between thhe loading pro
ocess and thee
AS
SRS. As descrribed in chapteer 3, the ASRS must assuree
thaat the differennt retrieval w
waves are not mixed whilee
witthin concept 1 and 2 thhe final sequ
uence can bee
esttablished by thhe loading stattion itself.
Unlike in cooncept 1, wheere transport racks can bee
tak
ken out of the buffer and looaded onto thee tugger trainss
in a free order,, the requiredd order of arrrival is fixedd
hen the first SL
LC is loaded iinto the loadin
ng shelve. If a
wh
tug
gger train arriives not in tiime, the nextt train, whichh
shaall be loaded in the same loading statio
on, must waitt
unttil the transffer depth is ccleared, caussing a tighterr
cou
upling betweeen the diffferent tugger trains. Thee
dettailed results of the benchm
mark can be found
f
in tablee
2.
Tab
ble 2. Benchma
ark results of a
automated load
ding concepts
Co ncep
pt 1
Co ncep t 2
Drive-T hru
204.00
00
300.000
96.000
55
108
48
T ran
r spo rt shelve
e
lo adin
a
g time [m in /tou r]
17,7
19,9
10
Ou
u tpu t [tou rs/h]
3,4
tug
g g er train load ing
i
tim
m e [min]
0,5
2,8
T ach
a nical lead tim
me
--
--
Re
eq uir ed m an po wer
w
[em
mp lo yees/tou r]
0,22
0,28
0,1
Errg on o mics
++
+ +
De
ecou p ling b etw een
e
lo adin
a
g and ASRS
S
De
ecou p ling b etw een
e
tug
g g er trains
++
In vestm
v
en t []
Figure 5. Com
mparison of tec
chnical lead tim
me for differentt
automated loa
ading concepts
s
6. BENCHM
MARK OF THE
E DRIVE-THR
RU CONCEPT
T
Re
eq uir ed flo or sp
pace
[m
m ]
Im
m pr ovem ent
Un
n chan ged
De
eclin e
7. CONCLUSIO
ONS FOR THE
E REPLACEM
MENT TIME
m
timee
From a custoomer point off view, the maximum
bettween the stocck falls below
w reorder leveel and time off
rep
plenishment which
w
can be aassured by the supplier is off
speecial interest. On basis off the replacem
ment time thee
req
quired stocks at the workpllaces and reorrder levels aree
deffined. Dependding on the logistics conccept differentt
tim
me shares musst be taken intto account. Fiigure 6 showss
this correlation using the exxample of a kanban-card-sysstem.
241
Figure 6. Time
e shares of rep
placement time
e in milk run
supplied systtems
242
in
derr
[1]] Klug,
F,,:
Logistikkmanagement
Automobilinndustrie, Sprringer Verlag
g Heidelberg,,
2009
[2]] n.n. Vorbildd Supermarkt in Logistik Heute,
H
Nr. 11,,
2009, pp.300-31
[3]] Dreher, S.,
S
Nrnberrger, A., Kulus, D..
Routenoptim
mierung in dder Produktio
onslogistik inn
ZWF Zeitscchrift fr wirttschaftlichen Fabrikbetrieb.
F
.
Vol. 104, ppp.131-135
[4]] Dickmann, Philipp,: Schlanker Materialfluss,
M
,
Springer Veerlag Heidelbeerg, 2009
243
step
Knowledge
area
tool /method
definition of
a project
data
acquisition
data
analysis
data
visualisation
Vision
creativity
technique
layout
planing
Choice
assistance
Feasibility
financial
qualitativequantitative
simulation
technical
244
245
246
Competence requirements of
warehouse operators
Zoltn Kovcs
Professor
University of Pannonia
Faculty of Business and Economics
Beta Pat
Associate Professor
University of Pannonia
Faculty of Business and Economics
Lszl Szab
Assistant
University of Pannonia
Faculty of Business and Economics
1. INTRODUCTION
247
Competence
type
Competence
Significance and aspects of selective waste
collection
Professional knowledge
3. TOOLS IN WAREHOUSES
248
Social
competences
pace of learning
efficient usage of tools,
work safety.
Method
competences
Personal
competences
Manageability
Motivated
Systematic work
Keeping clean environment
Ability to overview
Unit 1
Receiving and
transferring
goods
Unit 2
Transloading
and repacking
Unit 3
Storing and
retrieving
goods
Unit 5
Shipping
orders
Unit 6
Maintenance,
health &
safety
Knowledge
He / she knows:
Skills
He / she is able to:
Competence
He / she is
comptetent to:
Unit 0 General knowledge and skills, personal and social
competencies, attitudes and attributes
the basics of
assist in the
work in a
materials
implementation of
customermanagement,
quality assurance
oriented
including:
methods
manner
different
use and maintain tools, apply his / her
warehousing
equipment and means
inter-relational
procedures
of transportation and
/ personal
handling
competencies
regulations
(customer-,
regarding
use the companys
environmental
ICT systems, standard suppliercontact and
protection and
software and
cooperation
efficient energy
workplace-specific
with team and
use
software
other
properties and
to read, understand
departments)
proper handling of
and fill-in
communicate
(hazardous) goods
documentation
professionally
He/she
evaluate functionality
and effectively
understands the
and efficiency of
take on
logistics process in equipment /
responsibility
the warehouse,
machinery used for
for co-workers
incl.:
transport
/ sub-ordinates
the companys
use the companys
work
structure and
ICT systems
accurately and
responsibilities of produce receipt /
reliable
other departments
dispatch
(admin,
work in a cost
documentation
commercial,
and time adapt and handle
technical services)
effective way
documentation (i.e.
documentation
filling in, passing on) reflect on
procedures
possibilities for
follow-up purchase
improving
orders
processes
act competently
within the
logistics
system
Unit 2 Transloading and repacking
physical quantities unpack / sort goods
efficiently and
and types of cargo distinguish physical
effectively
quantities and types of organize goods
the companys
for the next
cargo for proper
warehouse system
step of the
storage in the
process
warehouse
Unit 3 Storing and retrieving goods
the warehouse
allocate storage
work in a
customerorientated
manner
communicate
well and
efficiently
keep an
overview
efficiently and
effectively
pick and pack
orders
devise and
implement a
plan for
efficient
loading
communicate
and coordinate
the process
with the driver
249
250
REFERENCES
Milo Rajkovi
PhD Student
University of Belgrade
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering
Nenad Zrni
Asociate Professor
University of Belgrade
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering
INTRODUCTION
Network
Reliability
Warehousing
E-commerce
Increased business
opportunities and
diversification of
the supply chains.
Dimension
Outcome
Paradox
Costs
Reduction of costs
through
improvement in
packaging and
reduction of wastes.
Benefits are
derived by the
distributors.
Environmental costs
are often
externalized.
Integrated supply
chains. JIT and
door to door
provide flexible
and efficient
physical
distribution
systems.
Extended
production,
distribution
and retailing
structures
consuming
more space, more
energy and
producing more
emissions.
Time /
Flexibility
Concentration of
environmental
impacts next to
major hubs and
along corridors.
Pressure on local
communities.
Modes used,
trucking and air
transportation, are
the least
environmentally
efficient.
Inventory shifted in
part to public
roads (or in
containers),
contributing
to congestion and
space
consumption.
Changes in physical
distribution
systems towards
higher levels of
energy
consumption.
251
Some of these risks will be transport infrastructurerelated. Others will be related to the nature and location
of logistical facilities, particularly distribution centres
and freight terminals. Heavy snow cover on the roofs of
some distribution centres in Germany during the severe
winter of 2009-10 increased the risk of collapse to the
level where staff had to be evacuated and operations
disrupted.
2.3 Analysis of the impact of climate-induced
changes in agricultural patterns and human
settlements on logistical systems and supply
chains
252
253
3.5 Green IT
254
255
Proton Motors company ran its first forklift demonstration on a STILL R 60-30 for two years at Munich
Airport, starting in 2004. This unit hybridized an 18 kW
Proton Motor PEMFC and a fiber nickel-cadmium
battery manufactured by Hoppecke. Cargogate GmbH
used the STILL forklift at the airport, and was able to
run a full eight-hour shift with 7 liters of gaseous H2 [9].
CONCLUSION
256
This paper deals with a problem of design of logistics process and systems
in the field of waste management in developing countries. The main focus
is put on the determination of economic distance for transshipment from
direct waste transport by waste collecting vehicles to the long distance
transport. The method employed should make support by decision making
processes in allocation problems of waste management facilities. This
paper provides also a short breakdown of structure of logistics costs
(capital, operating and personnel costs) for waste collection, envelope and
transport exemplified by Serbia as developing country compared to
Germany as developed country.
Keywords: waste management, waste collection, envelope and transport,
economic distance for transshipment
INTRODUCTION
257
Settlement structure
Organization and
administration
Dividing of waste disposal areas in main groups (disposal groups) according to the
population and settlement structure at the State level
2. Design of logistic processes and systems for waste transport
Variant 0: Direct transport (Waste Collection Vehicle (WCV))
Variant 1: WCV Loading Long Distance Transport (Semi Trailer Truck with Walking Floor)
Variant 2: WCV Loading Long Distance Transport (Trailer Truck ACTS)
Variant 3: WCV (Special Demount Bodies-Exchange Containers) Loading Long Distance Transport
(Exchange Containers)
Estimate of economic distance for direct transport and transshipment to long distance transport
3. Cost comparison
Comparison of logistic costs (capital, operating and labor costs) for each logistic process
variant and disposal group
258
Table 1: Dividing of waste disposal areas of Serbia in main comparable groups (statistic source [2])
Group
Municipalities:
Group 1
Group 2
Group 3
Group 4
up to 30.000 residents
from 30.000 up to 60.000 residents
from 60.000 up to 100.000 residents
above 100.000 residents
Total:
Number
17
21 %
25 %
20 %
34 %
100 %
Average size of
population
17.657
42.400
77.470
151.818
44
1.549.391
Figure 2: Settlement pattern of Serbia according to municipality size and resident number (inner ring: municipality
number, outer ring: overall resident number)
Share
1.560.795
20
88
44
20
17
169
Overall
Population
1.560.795
1.881.604
1.549.391
2.580.912
7.572.702
259
260
40
43,75
1+2
10
1,09
0,1094
55
39,86
17,45
3,59
1
22,56
Unit
Semi Trailer
Waste collection
vehicle
(2shift work)
km/h
/h
/h
/t
0,32
t
/km
/km
0,0321
/tkm
0,0141
/tkm
y = 0,2188x
y= 0,0281x+ 5,8
8,00
6,00
y= 0,0281x + 3,59
4,00
2,00
0,00
0
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
Transport distance [km]
45
50
55
60
Sensitivity analysis
Variants:
Current
Scenario 1
Scenario 2
Scenario 3
151.973
100.000
50.000
0
11.156
29.001
34.511
33.420
45.505
Germany
Serbia
Capital costs
Operating costs
Personnel costs
Comparison of annual costs for waste transfer station without compacting of waste between the two
countries is shown in Figure 6.
[/a]
250.000
200.000
2 shift work
68.840
150.000
100.000
80.390
7.552
53.129
50.000
74.462
49.964
0
Germany
Capital costs Operating costs
Serbia
Personnel costs
261
32.353
60.000
40.000
20.000
47.665
24.765
3.839
38.143
37.220
Serbia
Personnel costs
CONCLUSION
262
0
Germany
Capital costs Operating costs
H. Zadek
Prof. Dr.-Ing.
Otto von Guericke University
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering
Institute of Logistics and
Material Handling Systems
263
264
total traffic
telecommunications
motorization
industrial city
in 1920
modern city in
1970
megalopolis
2020
weak
strong
weak
passive
overdriven
strong
drifting
active
internal
outside
individual
psychological
perspective
individualbehavior
basedperspective
collective
culturalperspective
politicalperspective
265
central
decentralized
individual
technical
collective
human
266
reductionism
holistic view
Behavioral
Technical
Expert Survey
observation
brainstorming
electronic ticketing
transverse counting
brainpool
node counting
method 635
cordon counting
synectics
morphological analysis
noise measurement
CNB method
speed measurement
household survey
role play
Data Processing
quantitative
qualitative
trend extrapolation
impact models
simulation models
indicator models
holistic view
diversity
max!
level of detail
level of detail
diversity
level of detail
diversity
min!
necessary data
data requirement
necessary data
max!
data availability
min!
data extrapolation
cyclists
flora/fauna
..
German
need
..
development
Thai
..
strategic
..
culture
interaction time
input restriction
side street
guideline
regulation
costs
wear
I&C technologies
velocity
..
sensor
sense organ
satellite
..
law
information flow
of road traffic
bikeway
..
..
operative
tactical
main street
lane markings
..
Japanese
infrastructure
traffic sign
public bus
..
history
traffic light
bike
car driver
ground condition
potential
car
pedestrians
weather
accompanying
facilities
vehicle
subject
environment
..
state of the
element
interaction type
Figure 7. Cross-impact-analysis
definition of interaction
267
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
5. CONCLUSION
[10]
[11]
[12]
[13]
[14]
[15]
[16]
[17]
[18]
[19]
[20]
REFERENCES
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
268
[21]
[22]
[23]
[24]
[25]
Evaluation of Risk
in Logistic Processes by Applying
Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process
Vladimir Gajovi
Dunav Insurance Company
Belgrade, Makedonska 4
SERBIA
Gordana Radivojevi
Associate professor
University of Belgrade
Mihajlo Pupin Institute
Belgrade, Volgina 15
SERBIA
Modern logistic processes are becoming more complex and more dynamic
and they are exposed to numerous risks in transport, handling and
warehousing, that is, in the physical distribution of goods from sender to
receiver. Consequences of the risk existence can be various, from delay in
realization of certain logistic processes and activities to loss, damage to or
destruction of goods and cancellation of delivery.
The aim of this paper is to show one approach to the risk evaluation in
logistic processes. The paper describes main characteristics of risks in
logistic processes and the model for evaluation of risk during physical
distribution of goods from sender to receiver. The model is based on the
application of the Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP) method. The
developed model uses subjectivity, experience and knowledge when
determining significance of selected risk elements in relation to total risk.
Keywords: Risk, Logistics Process, Physical Distribution Process, Fuzzy
Analytic Hierarchy Process.
1. INTRODUCTION
269
270
(1,1,1)
(3/2,2,5/2)
(3/2,2,5/2)
(3/2,2,5/2) (1/2,1,3/2)
(2/5,1/2,2/3)
(1,1,1)
(1/2,1,3/2)
(3/2,2,5/2) (3/2,2,5/2)
(2/5,1/2,2/3)
(2/3,1,2)
(1,1,1)
(3/2,2,5/2) (1/2,1,3/2)
(2/3,1,2)
(2/5,1/2,2/3)
(2/3,1,2)
(1,1,1)
(3/2,2,5/2)
(2/5,1/2,2/3)
(1,1,1)
271
SA
SB
SC
SD
SE
(0.162,
0.280,
0.460)
(0.132,
0.228,
0.376)
(0.110,
0.193,
0.353)
(0.100,
0.158,
0.253)
(0.085,
0.140,
0.291)
V(SASC)=1
V(SASD)=1
V(SASE)=1
V(SBSA)=0.803 V(SBSC)=1
V(SBSD)=1
V(SBSE)=1
V(SCSE)=1
REFERENCES
Criterion
W'
0.803
0.685
0.426
0.480
0.295
0.237
0.202
0.126
0.141
Weights
0.123
0.079
0.084
0.057
0.059
0.402
0.079
0.066
0.057
0.046
0.319
0.101
0.079
0.052
0.011
0.037
0.279
Level
Low risk
High risk
272
Vojislav Tomi
University of Ni
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering
Zoran Marinkovi
University of Ni
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering
Danijel Markovi
University of Ni
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering
Goran Markovi
University of Kraljevo
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering
PROMETHEE METHOD
IMPLEMENTATION ON DUMPER TIRE
CHOICE ANALYSIS
In this paper, dumpers and their tires are observed. The aim of the research
in this paper is to obtain best tire choice for damper mobile mine
machines. The complexity of tire exploitation of mine mobile machines
requires appropriate tires selection. The primary aim of this research is to
explain the role and significance of multi-criteria method evaluation using a
example on tires choice. In order to objectively analyze the level of tires
competition for dumpers, in this work, mathematical method of multi-criteria
evaluation, Promethee II, is used. Using Promethee II method, five types of
tires are evaluated and mutually compared. During evaluation of five types of
tires, seven criteria have been used. The results, obtained by multi-criteria
evaluation using presented method, clearly show that this method proved to be
a successful tool during evaluation of tires selection for dumpers.
Keywords: Tires choice, Multi-criteria decisions, Promethee II method
1. INTRODUCTION
Diging-transportation
machines
(buldozers,
dumpers, grades, etc.) perform their working process
during movement on traction regime [1]. In open pit
mining, during performance of logistic activities there is
a high level of risk and danger of increasing costs for
mine machines. There, after explosions and fuel, tires
are the most exploited. Depending on exploitation
conditions, their participation in total costs of machine
maintenance is up to 25% [2]. For this reason,
appropriate choice of tires for mine machines can
significantly reduce maintenance costs.
Decision problems of tires types usually come to
selection of the best compromising solution. Beside real
criteria values by which decision is made, the selection
of the best solution also depends on the decision maker,
that is, on his individual preferences. In order to
simplify the decision process, many mathematical
methods have been suggested. Preference Ranking
Organization Method for Enrichment Evaluation
(PROMETHEE) represents one of the most frequently
used methods of multi-criteria decisions. Beside this
method, other methods are also available. The Method
of Analytical Hierarchical Processes (AHP) and the
ELECTRE method took the significant place in
mathematical description of complex processes which
appear during decisions. All these methods have one
basic task, to help the process of alternative evaluation.
In this paper, PROMETHEE II method is used in
order to mutually compare five types of tires for mine
machines. As a representative, dumper mobile machine
has been used, and it is the most used mobile machine in
open pit mining. A tires for dumpers is evaluated by
Correspondence to: Vojislav Tomi, research assistant
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering,
Aleksandra Medvedeva 14, 18000 Nis, Serbia
E-mail: vojislav@masfak.ni.ac.rs
273
3. MATHEMATHICAL MODEL
IP( a , b ) W j Pj ( a , b ), b W j 1 ,
IP( a ,b ) 1 n Pj ( a ,b ),
(4)
(1)
Pa ,b P b , a .
(2)
(5)
IPa , x
x A
i 1
(6)
Figure 1. Types of preference functions P (d) with parameters that illustrate them
274
(3)
1
Very low
2
Low
3
Medium
4
Strong
5
Very
strong
Alternative
Price
Performance
(tkph)
Consistence
(Ibs)
Comfort
Pneumatic
heating
Weight
(kg)
Maximum
speed (km/h)
RT-4A
RL-4J
VMTP
VRDP
REM-9S
min
5
5
3
3
1
0.3
max
394
440
544
513
425
0.2
max
60000
60000
59900
59900
59850
0.2
max
5
5
3
3
1
0.1
min
5
4
3
3
1
0.1
min
1389
1337
1310
1400
1412
0.05
max
50
50
50
50
50
0.05
Weight Wi
275
Alternative
Rang
T(a)
Bridgestone
Bridgestone
Goodyear
Goodyear
Double Coin
VMTP
VRDP
RL-4J
RT-4A
REM-9S
1
0.225
2
0.150
3
0.001
4
-0.125
5
-0.250
5. RESULTS ANALYSIS
276
6. CONCLUSION
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
277
[3]
278
SESSION D
CONSTRUCTIONS AND DESIGN
ENGINEERING
Milo Risti
PhD Student
University of Belgrade
Faculty of Technical Sciences
Sanja Vasin
PhD Student
University of Belgrade
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering
1. INTRODUCTION
279
FB
PL
SB
NP
Figure 1. 3D model of traction gear unit
1
1587
FG
F1
2
F1
F2
350
950
Horizontal
component
SK
Vertical
component
F1
60nLh
106
2 106
3.33
60 3.9 1350
2.8 106 N
106
280
281
282
a)
c)
f rI
1
2
c
1
me 2
3418 106
1181Hz
62
(3)
Operation teeth mesh frequency of the first gear pair is
fI=n1z1/60=1480.53/60=1307 Hz. The ratio between
exciting and natural frequency fI/frI=1307/1181=1.1 is in
the range 0.851.15, which indicates the full resonance
of helical pair. For bevel pair pair (the second stage),
applying the same procedure, natural frequency is:
f rII
1
2
c
1
me 2
1562 106
632Hz
99
(4)
and
teeth
mesh
frequency
is
fII=n3z3/60=1305.23/60=500Hz. The ratio between
exciting and natural frequency fII/frII=500/632=0.792 is
close to resonance, since it is close to the lower limit of
0.851.15.
4.2 Gear drive design parameters harmonisation
Figure 12. Dynamic model of gear pair in mesh (a) and flank
clarence space for alternately colisions (b)
0.00635 x1 0.11654 1
cth
zn1
zn 2
zn1
x
0.00193x2 0.24188 2 0.00529 x12 0.00182 x22
zn 2
(1)
283
5. CONCLUSION
REFERENCES
284
NOMENCLATURE
T
n
Kv
KA
vs
f
fr
cth
c
Torque
Speed of rotat. (revolutions per minute RPM)
Dynamical factor
Application factor
Velocity of teeth collision
Teeth mesh frequency
Frequency of resonance (Natural frequency)
Theoretical average speciffic teeth stiffness
mr
me
Equivalent mass
c'
c
zn
x
12
b
J
Mile Savkovic
Associate Professor
University of Kragujevac
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering Kraljevo
Goran Pavlovic
M. Sc. Eng.
Kneginje Milice 26/27,
37240 Trstenik, Serbia
Milomir Gasic
Full Professor
University of Kragujevac
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering
Neboja Zdravkovi
Teaching Assistant
University of Kragujevac
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering Kraljevo
1. INTRODUCTION
(1)
(2)
D design variables.
g1 r1 k 1 0 .
(3)
g2 r 2 k 2 0 .
(4)
g3 r 3 k 3 0 .
(5)
g 41 f v f v , dop 0, g 42 f h f h, dop 0 .
(6)
g 5 T Td 0 .
(7)
b h h b
(9)
285
A g 2 A g 2
g2 0 .
b h h b
(10)
A g 3 A g 3
g3 0 .
b h h b
(11)
A g 4 A g 4
g4 0 .
b h h b
(12)
A g5 A g5
g5 0 .
b h h b
(13)
;
b
b y b A2 b y A b 2 y b 2
h
A
x
M
M
1 A M cv 1 1
1 A
g1
c 1
cv 2
2 2 ch 2 ;
h
x h A h x A h x h y b A h
A
2 e h / s;
b
A
2 (e b 2 h) / s;
h
(16)
e y M 'cv
.
x M 'ch
(17)
M cv / x M ch / y k1
k1 h c / x ka c / y k1
(18)
(14)
k1 0 .(15)
x h A
y b A
286
g2 r 2 k 2
M
D 1
0,9 ch1 k 2 0 . (19)
Ap
Wy
2 4
(20)
1 0, 489 ( 0, 2) 2 .
(21)
(23)
x ce
r 21 K1 M cv f1 c f 2 ,
2 x
;
x2 y2
f1
f (b)
;
h A b2
0, 22
1 for x 0, 673 ,
x 2
(30)
x 1 for x 0, 673 .
r 22 K 2 M ch f 3 k a c f 4 ,
where: K1
f2
f (b )
;
h b2
K 2 0,9 / y ; f 3 1/(b A) ; f 4 1/ b .
b
b
b
h
h
h
(24)
(e a m 2 e g m y b)
4 x M cv h 2
, (25)
1
2
2
2
2 (e d y b 2 a m k g m y h)
h
p 0,83 0, 06 k ,
(31)
xp
Ko
K p
8, 2
e 1, 05
; c p 1,15 0, 0072 k ;
2
s f ;
1 12 (1 ) f y ;
Ko
E
ek
(32)
2
K p
2
8, 2
; e E 2 e k .
1,88 0, 06 k
12 (1 ) s f
(26)
K1 M cv k2 2 f (h) K 2 M ch k2 h 2
, .(27)
k2 h3 K1 c k2 2 f (h) K 2 ka c k2 h 2
k3
M cv c A
M ka c A
f ch
k3 0 .
x h A
y b A
(29)
xp and x as the
e y c1
.
f x ka
(33)
M cv / x f M ch / y k3
.
k 3 h c / x f k a c / y k3
(34)
287
fb , Rd 1, x
e1 x
Sd 1, y
f b , Rd 1, y
e1 y
6 Sd 1, x Sd 1, y
1 x 1 y
f b , Rd 1, x fb , Rd 1, y
Sd 1, x Sd 1, y Sd 1, x Sd 1, y f y / m . (40)
1 , (35)
1 p 0, 54 0, 015 k .
(36)
8, 2
; Ko s ;
1,59 0, 015 k 1xp
K 1 p 4
(37)
Sd 2, x
/ fb , Rd 2, x
e2 x
Sd 2, y / fb , Rd 2, y
e2 y
1.
(41)
2 / 2 x
1 24 x
Sd 2, y m /( 2 y f y )
1 24 y
1 . (42)
1 0, 22
1,13
1 for 1 y 0,831 ,
1 y 2
1y
(38)
1 y 1 for 1 y 0,831 .
The non-dimensional slenderness coefficient is:
1 y
Ko
s
.
K 1 y a / c1r 4
(39)
288
b1
0, 6
2
p 0,13
1 ; c 1, 25 0, 25 e ,
M cv / x M ch f / y k p1
Ap1 (h)
8, 4
K p
(49)
; c p 1, 042 0, 015 k ;
8, 4
4;
1,93 0, 06 k
. (48)
3 0, 4 M
1;
kr 2
Mkr 2
(43)
0, 6 kr1 h c / x k a c f / y k p1
c 1, 25 for K p e 2 2 .
3 F1 h 2
15,91 y
(44)
M cv c A
M ka c A
18, F1 e
,(51)
e 6 ch
f
15, 91 y
x h2
y b2
18, 3 F1 h 2
15,91 y
4 kr1 h 3 c / x 6 ka c f / y k p 2
,(52)
F1 L3
1 w (1 6 p 2 ) f v , dop K v L .(53)
48 E I x
x and x as the
;
M 0,9 ; y
15,91 y A
kr1 Mkr1
(45)
(46)
k a F1h L3
1 w (1 6 p 2 ) f h , dop K h L .(54)
48 E I y
g 42 ka F1h I x K h
0.
g 41
F1 I y
Kv
(55)
b
F1 y b
h
F1 y 2 b 2
289
F1h L2 1 w (1 6 p 2 )
48 E x 2 K f h 2
(57)
where: G (m)
0, 486 mm
.
0,5 (mQ mk )
(58)
(59)
Cd M L3 Cd r L4
Td 0 . (61)
h2 A
h2
Cd M L3
h2
11 m1
1
2 Cd M L3 2 Cd r L4
;
h3 A
h3
g5 6
C M L
1
d 2
b
d
h
11 m1
1
2
A
A . (62)
;
b
0,
k
2 G (m) 1
290
h 2 Cd r L4
(64)
e
k1
1,2
3,90
1,3
4,00
1,4
4,10
1,5
4,25
k2
3,35
3,33
3,31
3,30
k3
4,20
4,30
4,40
4,55
L 18m
g5 6
C M L3 1 A
1
d 2
2
d
h
h
11 m1
A h
(60)
Td d / 6
Table 2
1, 0
.
48 E x 2
Cd M L3
A5 A(h)
(63)
5
8
10
16
L 12m
k p1
k p2
k p1
k p2
2,73
1,99
1,58
0,85
1,04
0,62
0,48
0,28
2,39
1,55
1,17
0,62
0,81
0,47
0,36
0,21
Table 3
e
G(m)
1.20
0.53
e
G(m)
1.20
0.48
e
G(m)
1.20
0.44
k=2.5
1.40
1.60
0.43
0.33
k=3.5
1.40
1.60
0.35
0.25
k=4.5
1.40
1.60
0.31
0.19
1.80
0.24
2.00
0.17
1.80
0.14
2.00
0.05
1.80
0.07
2.00
-0.04
s f
23.5
.
Rei
65 e
(67)
a
(65)
(66)
c
a
(65)
(66)
d
(67)
(65)
k f h / 20 .
(66)
291
292
Miroslav Rogi
Full-time Professor
University of Banja Luka
Faculty od Mechanical Engineering
Simo Jokanovi
Associate Professor
University of Banja Luka
Faculty od Mechanical Engineering
1. INTRODUCTION
293
294
Product
Publication
Drawing
Sheet
Constraint
Page Setup
Body
Fix
Together
Text
Sketch
Position
View
Constraint
Analyze
Table
Relation
Parameter
Analysis
Model
Post
Manager
Mesh
Manager
Analysis
Case
Analysis
Set
Process
Item
Resource
Machining
Process
Manufacturing
Activity
PPR Activity
295
REFERENCES
3. CONCLUSION
296
Metod uk
Teaching Assistant
University of Ljubljana
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering
Ljubljana, Slovenia
Boris Jerman
assistant professor
University of Ljubljana
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering
Ljubljana, Slovenia
1. INTRODUCTION
297
Elastic modulus
E [GPa]
Yield strength
fy [MPa]
Poisson ratio
[kg/m3]
Tangent modulus
Et [GPa]
7850
210
320
0.3
0.100
Density
Density [kg/m3]
Poisson ratio
Ex
Ey
Ez
xy
yz
xz
Gxy
Gyz
Gxz
120
0.5
11
45
2.32
5.8
0.4
Shear
298
fy.x
fy.y
fy.z
Et.x
Et.y
Et.z
0.033
0.1
0.04
0.01
0.07
0.03
fvy.xy
fvy.yz
fvy.xz
Gt.xy
Gt.yz
Gt.xz
0.02
0.68
0.02
0.01
0.01
0.01
Figure 1. FE calculation model of a double interlocking tongue and grove longitudinal joint with applied load and boundary
conditions
299
Distance d
[mm]
Shear stiffness ky
[kN/m2]
Shear capacity Py
[kN/m]
60
653
1.16
75
675
1.18
90
701
1.19
120
707
1.18
180
706
1.18
240
705
1.18
300
Case
Elastic
modulus
Ey [MPa]
Yield
strength
fy.y [MPa]
Tangent
modulus
Et.y [MPa]
80%
8.8
0.08
0.056
90%
9.9
0.09
0.063
100% *
11.0 *
0.10 *
0.070 *
110%
12.1
0.11
0.077
Case
Shear stiffness ky
[kN/m2]
Shear capacity Py
[kN/m]
80%
584
0.94
90%
621
1.04
100%
653
1.16
110%
682
1.28
301
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
REFERENCES
302
[8]
DI Andreas Wolfschluckner
PhD candidate
Graz University of Technology
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering
Institute of Logistics Engineering
DI Dr.techn C. Landschtzer
Assistant Professor / Workgroup leader
Graz University of Technology
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering
Institute of Logistics Engineering
1. INTRODUCTION
303
Figure 2. Infinitesimal Cable Element - balance of forces / displacement of cable during load transposition
S d x di 1 d
q si 1 d q i
s 0 1 d s 0
S
1
EA
x di
0 ; i 1, 2, 3
0
t 2
2
x di
1 d 0
i 1 s 0
3
(2)
Consequences on:
characteristic
numerical approaches
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
304
analytical approaches
dr
2
0
d s L
J 1
(6)
K NL
T t
t
0
B NL
0 S 0 B NL d V
(7)
For the time independent and nonlinear straindisplacement transformation matrix B NL follows:
t
0
BNL 0J 1H ,r
(8)
t
0
S11 E 0t 11
(9)
[8]
t
0
1
2
t
0
X T 0t X I
(10)
M H T Hd 0V
(11)
u C t tu
t t
0 K L 0 K NL u
t
t t
R 0t F
KL
T
L
B E 0 B Ld V
0
(4)
B L 0J 1
x T H ,r H ,r 0u T H ,r H ,r
(5)
u the displacements of
all nodes. The derivation of the displacement
interpolation matrix H with respect to the local variable
0
t t
(3)
(12)
C M 0K L 0K NL
is
Sf
HS
t t
0
f S d 0S H T
0
t t
0
f B d 0V
(13)
B LT 0t S d 0V
(14)
the
305
u j n 1 2 1 2 u j n 2 u j 1n u j 1n u j n 1
Figure 4. Curvilinear element with interpolation functions
M u C tu K L tu t R
t
(15)
2
2u
2 u
c
L
x 12
x 12
(16)
cL
(17)
Sd S 0
EA
uA
cL
(18)
306
u j 1 1 2 u j 0
2
2
j 1
u j 10 tg x 1 j
(20)
c L t / x 1
(21)
S d u / x 1 EA
(19)
(22)
u k
t t
u k 1 u k
u k
u k
t t
t t
t t
(23)
u k 1 tu u k tu
t t
u k 1 tu u k
t t
u tu
(24)
(25)
M uu t tuu k C uu t tuu k
K Luu 0t K NLuu u u k
M ub t tub
k
C ub t tub
(26)
K Lub 0t K NLub u b k t t Ru t t Fu k 1
(27)
1
2t
t t
t t
t 2
u t tu
(28)
u 2 tu t tu
(29)
5. CONCLUSION
308
Stankovi Milo
Research Associate
University of Belgrade
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering
Risti Milo
Research Associate
University of Belgrade
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering
Alil Ana
Research Associate
Institute Gosa
Risti Marko
Research Associate
Institute Gosa
INTRODUCTION
REPARATION ACTIVITIES
309
Steel
Chemical composition, %
SRPS EN
10027-1
Mn
Si
Cr
Al min.
Mo
Nb
Ni
Ti
S690QL
0.20
1.7
0.80
0.025
0.015
1.50
0.018
0.70
0.06
2.00
0.12
0.12
0.80
Si
Mn
Cr
Ni
Mo
0.08
0.60
1.70
0.25
1.50
0.50
Reh min.
Rm min.
Amin.
N/mm
N/mm
668
713
21.8
651
715
22.9
5. WELDABILITY
310
Rp0.2
Rm
A5
AV, -40 0C
N/mm2
N/mm2
690
770 - 940
17
47
311
312
13. CONCLUSION
1. INTRODUCTION
313
u ai bij w j
for
i 1, 2, 3, , m .
(1)
j 1
vij
wi
.
wj
(2)
v ji
1
.
vij
(3)
1 v12
v
21 1
vn1 vn 2
v1n w1
w1
w
v2 n w2
2
n .
wn
1 wn
(4)
314
(5)
PROCESSING
OPERATIONS
Summarizing
Sorting
Classifying
Calculating
OUTPUT
OPERATIONS
Reporting,
Reproducing
Communicating
STORAGE AND
RETRIEVAL
Storing
Retrieving
u (ai ) bij c j .
(6)
j 1
Chains
Natural Fibre Ropes
Synthetic Fibre Ropes
Wire Ropes
Construction Ropes
Excavator Ropes
General Engineering Ropes
Oil-well Applications Ropes
Shipping Applications Ropes,
etc.
6 19
6 37
8 19 , etc.
Attributes (say of
the 6 19 type of
wire rope)
Families of flexible
hoisting/hauling
appliances
Resistance to breaking,
Resistance to bending fatigue,
Resistance to abrasion,
Resistance to crushing,
Resistance to corrosion,
Cost of the rope.
Resistance to Breaking
bs
4Wb
d r 2
4l
d r 2
Wb
.
l
(7)
d
f E r .
Dd
(8)
u (ai ) bij c j .
(9)
j 1
6 by 19S
6 by 19
6 by 25Fi
6 by 26WS
6 by 31WS
6 by 36WS
6 by 41WS
0.8996
0.9682
0.8996
0.9003
0.9055
0.9055
0.9055
0.7647
0.7647
1.0000
0.8667
1.0000
1.1304
1.3000
1.3333
1.0000
1.0000
1.2000
1.0000
0.8571
0.7500
1.0753
1.0753
1.0753
1.0753
0.9259
0.9259
0.9259
Sum of Ratings
4.0729
3.8082
3.9749
4.0422
3.8315
3.8190
3.8815
0.2456
0.1327
0.0721
0.1559
0.0494
0.1206
0.2334
W
fs d .
Wsw
(10)
Wd f sWsw
6 24500
147 kN .
1000
(11)
Type or Rope
Grade of
Rope
Lay of Rope
Bright or
Galvanized
Design
Load, kN
Calculated Rope
Diameter, mm
Standard Rope
Diameter, mm
Breaking
Load, kN
6 by 19S
Ordinary
Galvanized
147
17.3064
18
158.9
6 by 19S
Ordinary/Lang
Bright/Galv.
147
16.415
18
176.5
6 by 19S
Ordinary/Lang
Bright
147
15.9407
16
148.1
6 by 26WS
Ordinary
Galvanized
147
17.3064
18
158.9
6 by 26WS
Ordinary/Lang
Bright/Galv.
147
16.415
18
176.5
6 by 26WS
Ordinary/Lang
Bright
147
15.9407
16
148.1
Wire Rope
6 by 19S
Grade G
6 by 19S
Grade A
6 by 19S
Grade B
6 by 26WS
Grade G
6 by 26WS
Grade A
6 by 26WS
Grade B
Diameter Rating
0.8889
0.8889
1.0000
0.8889
0.8889
1.0000
Strength Rating
0.8996
1.0000
1.0651
0.9063
0.9994
1.0653
0.7442
0.7442
0.7442
0.8372
0.8372
0.8372
Sum of Ratings
2.5327
2.6331
2.8093
2.6264
2.7255
2.9025
0.0868
0.1283
0.1696
0.0336
0.0828
0.1175
318
REFERENCES
Milo orevi
Research Associate
University of Belgrade
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering
Darko Batina
Master of Science
University of Belgrade
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering
This paper describes current status of modeling energy usage patterns for
PCs, provides insight in their energy consumption, energy costs and CO2
emission. It also provides possible solutions for improving energy
efficiency and energy savings. The study involved analysis of two different
mode settings (High Performance and Power Saver mode) of same
computer and gaming test case study. Usage patterns for both modes were
modeled based on Intel's EEP methodology. Workload was simulated
with StressMyPC freeware software. PC energy consumption while
executing workload was measured with Trotec BX11 measuring device
during 15 days testing period, 8 hours a day. Computer and monitor were
separately observed.
Nenad Zrni
Associated Professor
University of Belgrade
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering
Boris Jerman
Assistant Professor
University of Ljubljana
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering
Jurij Hladnik
Teaching Assistant
University of Ljubljana
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering
1. INTRODUCTION
Country
Electricity
consumption
[billion kWh]
Electricity
consumption
per capita
[kWh per person]
2010
2011
2010
2011
Serbia
33,4
34,1
4 547,41
4 664,49
European
Union
2 906
2 901
5 891,7
N/A
World
17 930
17 780
2 649,16
2 566,32
319
320
Settings
High Performance
Power Saver
20 min
20 min
Sleep after
Never
15 min
Minimum
processor state
5%
5%
System cooling
policy
Active
Passive
Maximum
processor state
100%
50% (user
limitated)
15 min
5 min
321
Voltage
Maximum input
3680 W / 16A
Measuring range
2 - 3680 W
CAT II (2500)
Maximum recording
capacity
999,0 kWh
Maximum recording
time
999,9 hours
Minimum energy
display
0,1 kWh
Minimum cost
display
0,1
Batteries
3 x AAA R03/1,5 V
Operating
temperature
+5 C to +40 C
Operating conditions
Protection
IP20
Degree of
contamination
II (Dry, non-conductive
contamination only. Occasional
temporary conductivity through
dewing mus be reckoned with.)
Mode
Brightness
100%
Brightness
70%
Sleep
High
Performance
195 min
136,5 Wh
285 min
4,75 Wh
155 min
87,8 Wh
325 min
5,42 Wh
Power
Saver
Mode
Workload
Idle
Sleep
High
Performance
135 min
517,5 Wh
345 min
529 Wh
Power
Saver
135 min
447,75 Wh
60 min
92 Wh
285 min
9,5 Wh
7.3 Results
Consumption [Wh/day]
Mode
322
PC
Monitor
PC +
Monitor
High
Performance
1 046,5
141,25
1 187,75
Power
Saver
549,25
93,22
642,47
RS
EU
Number of
PC units
1,2106
21310
1109
Possible energy
savings [kWh]
144106
25,56 109
120109
Possible costs
savings []
9,6106
1,7109
8109
Possible CO2
reduction [t]
135,610
11310
High
Performance
Energy
consumption
Energy costs
CO2
Emission
1 187,75 Wh
0,08
1 116 g
Power
Saver
642,47 Wh
0,04
604 g
Possible
savings / day
545,28 Wh
0,04
512 g
Possible
savings / year
120 kWh
113 kg
World
6
24,110
323
324
SPECIAL SESSION E
MARITIME AND PORT LOGISTICS
Panayotis Zacharioudakis
Ph.D., Senior Research Engineer
Laboratory for Maritime Transport
National Technical University Athens
Sophia Daleziou
School of Applied Mathematical and
Physical Sciences
National Technical University of Athens
During the last thirty years, there has been an extraordinary growth in the
market of financial derivatives, in the field of shipping. This can be
attributed to the fact that financial derivatives are contracts which allow
all players participating in the shipping market to reduce their exposure to
the fluctuations in freight rates, bunker prices, interest rates, foreign
exchange rates and vessel values. This paper employs Artificial Neural
Network (ANN), in order to forecast the future price of freight derivatives.
More specifically, drawing on historical data for the period between
January 2005 and March 2009, an ANN is built and trained, and its
estimates lead to two individual results. The resulting model indicates to
the investor which position to take in the derivatives market (short for sale
of agreements and long for the purchase of agreements).
Keywords: freight rates, trading strategy, artificial neural networks,
shipping market modeling, freight rate forecasting
1. INTRODUCTION
325
bulk cargos, routes and ship sizes). The fact that the
shipping market is subject to a common valuation
structure/methodology and that in general, there is an
increased transparency, have contributed to their
success in shipping.
Such products are already traded over the counter
(OTC) at the markets of London and Oslo. Shipping
companies, as well as energy companies, use freight
derivatives, in order to cope with changes in freight
rates and these contracts are now considered the most
rapidly growing area of the shipping industry.
Definition: FFAs can be defined as future agreements
where the two parties undertake to buy or sell the
transportation of a bulk cargo from one location to
another at a price established at the time of closing the
agreement.
The settlement is in cash so there is no physical
delivery. Payment is made on a specific date agreed
upon by the two parties. For the settlement of FFAs, the
London Baltic Exchange BDI (Baltic Dry Index) and
BITR (Baltic International Tanker Routes) are taken
into account.
FFAs and history
The first FFAs appeared in 1985, when the BIFFEX
(Baltic International Freight Futures Exchange)
agreement was created. It was an agreement with
underlying average index the BFI (Baltic Freight Index)
of the Baltic Exchange. Progressively, and due to
market segmentation, many individual BFIs made their
appearance. They made their first appearance as private
agreements between two parties traded over the counter
in 1992.
FFA general characteristics types
FFAs, which should be mentioned for the
understanding of the paper, fall under the following
categories:
Forward Freight Agreements: Private agreements
entered into mainly by and between ship owners and
shippers and aiming at hedging against the volatility of
the freight market. In this case, the ship owner takes a
short position and sells FFAs whereas the shipper is the
buyer (long position).
Freight Futures: The principle behind them is the same
as above, however they are traded in organized markets,
such as IMAREX and NYMEX. Hence, like all
derivatives, FFAs are also used for hedging, speculative
and arbitrage purposes.
3. METHODOLOGY AND RESULTS
sxy
Capesize Sales,
(1)
sx s y
s xy
(x
i 1
x) ( y i y )
x y
n 1
i 1
n x y
n 1
, (2)
where
sx
1 n
( xi x ) 2
n 1 i 1
sy
1 n
( yi y )
n 1 i 1
(3)
and
2
(4)
Finally,
n
s xy
sx s y
(x
i 1
x) ( y y )
( xi x ) 2
i 1
x y
i 1
x
i 1
2
i
n x y
n x
y
i 1
(y
i 1
y )2
(5)
2
i
n y
327
FUTURE
-0,380
SPOT
-0,406
TS1
-0,215
TS2
TS3
-0,264
0,430
TS4
TS5
0,318
-0,168
TS6
1
-0,550
The correlation between the profit and the TS5 time series is <0, 2, because there exists a significant correlation in this time series
1 N 2
e t ) of a
N t 1
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
54%
77%
SuccessRates
64%
36%
0%
Test1_1
Test1_2
Test1_3
Test1_4
0.12
0.1
0.08
0.06
0.04
0.02
0
0.103
MSE
0.074
0.0584
0.0235
Test1_1
Test1_2
Test1_3
Test1_4
328
100%
80%
60%
77%
80%
85%
Test1_2_2
Test1_2_3
Test1_2_4
40%
20%
SuccessRates
34%
0%
Test1_2_1
0.12
0.1
0.08
0.06
0.04
0.02
0
0.1
0.0354
0.0235
Test1_2_1
Test1_2_2
MSE
0.0193
Test1_2_3
Test1_2_4
329
REFERENCES
Routes
C4
C7
P2A
P3A
CS4TC
PM4TC
HM6TC
330
IMAREX Listed Single Route and Basket of T/C Dry Bulk Futures
Sector
Route Description
Cargo Size
Capesize
Richards Bay Rotterdam
150000
Capesize
Bolivar Rotterdam
150000
Panamax
T/C Skaw Gibraltar Far East
74000
Panamax
T/C S.Korea Japan Pacific R/V
74000
Panel B: Listed Basket of T/C Dry-Bulk Futures
Capesize
T/C Average
n/a
Panamax
T/C Average
n/a
Handymax
T/C Average
n/a
Ivana Vukievi
University of Belgrade, Faculty of Transport
and Traffic Engineering
Danijela Pjevevi
University of Belgrade, Faculty of Transport
and Traffic Engineering
Duan Teodorovi
University of Belgrade, Faculty of Transport
and Traffic Engineering
Katarina Vukadinovi,
University of Belgrade, Faculty of Transport
and Traffic Engineering
Nataa Vidi
University of Pittsburgh, Industrial
Engineering Department
1. INTRODUCTION
Workers
under
consideration
represent
approximately 80% of the total port terminal workforce
and
are
directly
involved
with
container
(loading/unloading) operations. Depending on the skill
level each worker is trained to perform one main or
basic task (tasks require different skill levels). The
following tasks are assigned to workers: 1) crane
operator, 2) checker, 3) ship crew member (deckman) 4)
straddle-carrier driver and 5) manual labor (raiser).
The number of vessels that need service at the
terminal during the fixed period of time is known in
advance and fixed. Vessel arrival time is not known and
difficult to estimate. Therefore it is very hard to predict
the number of workers needed at the port at any time. In
order to satisfy the demand for workers, it is necessary
to have some flexibility when planning workers shifts
and assignments.
The workforce planning and assignment problem is
usually decomposed in two phases. Phase one is related
to the long term or monthly horizon, and phase two
addresses daily planning once more realistic data is
331
4 n 5
k 5
4
cik ck (i )k
ck
ck (i ) (ck (i ) ck )
M
(2)
d kj
Tj
T j i N | worker i
works
on
shift
1, , 4
T i N | worker i
Tj T 0
works
shift
j 1, , 4
u kj
the
xijk
number
of
additional
1 worker i
y ij
0 otherwise ,
works
on
subcontracted
on shift j
shift
i, j, k
i, j
x
k 1
k
ij
yij
i N , j
k
xij u kj n kj r j
k , j
i 1
(3)
(4)
(1)
cik is
332
4
yij 1
j 1
k k (i )
if
i D
(5)
yij 1
i D
(6)
yi1 yi 3 1
i D
(7)
j 1
y i1 y i 2 y i 4 1
i D
(8)
y ij 2
(9)
j 1
i D,
x1i , j (i ) 1 x i4, j (i ) 1 0
i T2 T3 D (11)
yij 0, 1
j 2,3
(10)
xijk 0, 1 u kj 0
i N , j , k
(12)
1 j j (i )
i D yij
0 otherwise
1 j j (i )
i D yij ? j j (i ) 1
0 otherwise
i (T1 T2 T3 T4 )
y ij ?
i T , j 1, ,4
(13)
(14)
k' 0,1,4
c
k(i)k ck(i)k'
V jkk'
j j(i), k, k' k(i)
(15)
1
ck(i)k
The value p jkk ' is the probability that the bee assigns
where:
c k (i ) k
ck (i ) k '
333
p jkk '
k (i ) k (i ) V
jkk '
pb
j j (i ), k , k ' k (i ) (16)
(17)
(19)
k 1
p bu 1
Ok
j j (i ) k 1 k ' 0
Ob =
Ob
R
Omax Ob
nb
b= 1, B
(18)
Skill level
Crane operator
Checker
Deckman
Straddle carrier driver
Raiser
Number
of
workers
in active
service
Number
of
workers
in
teams
36
36
36
108
72
1
1
1
3
2
Number
of
workers
in active
service
Number
of
workers
in
teams
36
36
36
108
72
1
1
1
3
2
The
required
number
of
workers
per shift
8
8
8
24
16
The number of
tasks that need to
be assigned
during the
planning period
(6 days)
192
192
192
576
384
The
required
number
of
workers
per shift
10
10
10
30
20
The number of
tasks that need to
be assigned
during the
planning period
(6 days)
240
240
240
720
480
Number of
workers that
could
be on double
duty
14
8
5
2
8
Skill level
Crane operator
Checker
Deckman
Straddle carrier driver
Raiser
334
Number of
workers that
could
be on double
duty
14
8
5
2
8
Skill level
Crane operator
Checker
Deckman
Straddle carrier driver
Raiser
Number
of
workers
in active
service
Number
of
workers
in
teams
42
42
42
126
84
1
1
1
3
2
Number
of
workers
in active
service
Number
of
workers
in
teams
42
42
42
126
84
1
1
1
3
2
Number
of
workers
in active
service
Number
of
workers
in
teams
60
60
60
180
120
1
1
1
3
2
The
required
number
of
workers
per shift
20
20
20
60
40
The number of
tasks that need to
be assigned
during the
planning period
(6 days)
480
480
480
1440
960
The
required
number
of
workers
per shift
30
30
30
90
60
The number of
tasks that need to
be assigned
during the
planning period
(6 days)
720
720
720
2160
1440
The
required
number
of
workers
per shift
30
30
30
90
60
The number of
tasks that need to
be assigned
during the
planning period
(6 days)
720
720
720
2160
1440
Number of
workers that
could
be on double
duty
25
20
15
9
16
Skill level
Crane operator
Checker
Deckman
Straddle carrier driver
Raiser
Number of
workers that
could
be on double
duty
30
25
15
14
16
Skill level
Crane operator
Checked
Deckman
Straddle carrier driver
Raiser
Table 6. Results Test 1
k
1
2
3
4
5
Number of tasks
assigned within the
additional shift
Heuristics
BCO
0
0
5
12
3
7
0
0
4
2
k
1
2
3
4
5
34
30
37
33
16
The number of
additional
subcontracted workers
Heuristics
BCO
12
29
10
20
6
1
36
15
20
10
Number of tasks
assigned within the
additional shift
Heuristics
BCO
0
0
4
32
5
21
0
0
1
2
Number of
workers that
could
be on double
duty
k
1
2
3
4
5
Number of tasks
assigned within the
additional shift
Heuristics
BCO
0
0
16
55
41
43
0
0
81
52
The number of
additional
subcontracted workers
Heuristics
BCO
568
271
810
364
266
345
165
923
213
107
The number of
additional
subcontracted workers
Heuristics
BCO
67
99
55
94
49
62
180
127
119
43
k
1
2
3
4
5
Number of tasks
assigned within the
additional shift
Heuristics
BCO
0
0
18
46
49
34
0
0
93
99
The number of
additional
subcontracted workers
Heuristics
BCO
513
655
495
579
460
536
1542
1668
910
463
335
Number of tasks
assigned within the
additional shift
Heuristics
BCO
0
0
23
171
58
100
0
0
171
30
k
1
2
3
4
5
The number of
additional
subcontracted workers
Heuristics
BCO
432
422
397
482
350
467
1265
1248
664
440
Test 1
Test 2
Test 3
Test 4
Test 5
Heuristics
BCO
336
Goran Bojanic
Researcher on projects of the Ministry of
Education and Science
University of Novi Sad
Faculty of Technical Sciences
Vladimir Bojanic
Teaching Assistant
University of Novi Sad
Faculty of Technical Sciences
1. INTRODUCTION
337
338
X kj 0 ),
Ykj - binary variable of the ordering of loading jobs (1 if
j S is loaded after k S and 0 otherwise),
M - a large number (Big M method).
The formulation is:
(SP) minimize
subject to
FLc c S ,
FLc FU c lc c S ,
direct cycle
FU k FU j MX kj uk
j , k S ,
FU j FU k M 1 X kj u j
FLk FL j MYkj lk
j , k S ,
j , k S ,
FL j FLk M 1 Ykj l j
e , l H * el
ATSP min
j , k S ,
FU c uc c S ,
X kj , Ykj 1,0 j , k S .
It can be seen that the optimization is performed by
maximization of number of double cycles. So the size of
the task is defined by number of the containers while
impact of the position of the container in the ship is
neglected. This is acceptable approximation for
container quay cranes in seaport terminals, since they
transport containers from the ship to gage area (area
between cranes rails). Whole crane moves only when it
finishes all tasks in one bay.
Inland barges are used to transport containers into the
hinterland on rivers and channels. Functionally, barges
are means of hinterland transportation (like trucks and
trains), operationally they are ships which are served by
quay cranes [14]. In typical river container terminal
crane transports the container in all three directions. So
the shown model cannot be applied for this situation.
Problem for container quay crane scheduling in river
container terminals is presented in papers [10] and [11].
Since barges do not posses automated stability control
systems, and fact that there is an uncertainty of
container weight, model is formulated in such a way
that barge stability is not endangered during reloading
process. So the model could be implemented in practice.
Optimization of reloading for each par of stacks is
performed by dynamic programming algorithm and the
stack sequencing corresponds to a well-known method
of the maximum traveling salesman problem (Max TSP;
see [6] ). Max TSP can be solved as a TSP by replacing
each edge cost by its additive inverse. A formal
definition of the ATSP is as follows. Let G V , H
e , l H
el el
subject to
el
l V ,
el
e V ,
eV
l V
eQ lV \ Q
zel 0
el
Q V : Q ,
e, l V ,
zel integer
e, l V , where zel 1 if and only if
arc e, l is in the optimal tour. Technical paramethers
of the exemined terminal are: container yard width is
42m, gantry and trolley velocities are 2m/s, distance
from the yard to the quay is 10m, simultanios loading of
2 barges are exemined (8 stacks, 12 bays, 4 containers
in stack). On the basis of model presented in [11], time
saving for double cycling compared to single cycling is
presented in Table 1 for different length of the terminal.
Table 1. Impact of container yard length on time saving
200
9153
500
20810
700
28537
~
e exist in G . The ATSP is used to find a Hamiltonian
340
Sang-Cheol Suh
Senior Researcher
Tonmyong University
Port and Logistics Institute
The purpose of this study is to find what service factors and demand model
are important to the shipping companies when they select ports. The study
results suggest that the demand model factors consist of two independent
variables, which are cost and loading/handling quantity of port. The first
one is related to the size and marketing policy of shipping company. The
second one should find out the relationship by cost elements only.
This model gives information regarding the level of optimum handling
charge to make maximum profit. While the present handling charge is
approximately US$ 40 per TEU, if handling charge would be raised to the
range of US$ 56~79, they can achieve maximum profit, that is the annual
total profit of container terminals in Busan Port will be US $ 546.8
million, which will be more than twice of current profit.
Keywords: Demand Model, Utility function, Port Selecting Factor, Port
Competition, Logit model.
1. INTRODUCTION
341
342
Classification
Number
Employee
20
Manager/Subsection Chief
40
Deputy Department
Head /Department Head
30
Executive
Position
TOTAL
Department
TOTAL
Accumul.
Construct Questions
(Factor)
101
Marine Affairs
68
Official Business
Others
29
101
Convenience
Amount of
Factor
Loadage
S4
0.948
I4
0.948
I3
0.679
S1
0.492
S7
0.858
V1
0.829
C1
0.84
S2
0.746
Loading and
Handling
Cost
Eigenvalue Explained
Variance
Cronbach
alpha
2.592
32.396
0.804
1.626
52.722
0.644
1.387
70.060
0.486
343
Contents of Hypothesis
The selecting factors of container terminal would give
Detailed
Hypothesis 1-1
Detailed
Hypothesis 1-2
Detailed
Hypothesis 1-3
standard.
Coeff.
Standard Standard.
Error
Coeff. ()
Multicollinear.
T-Value P-Value Toleran.
Limit
VIF
Constant
18.793
4.126
4.554
0.000
Convenien.
0.080
0.170
0.048
0.468
0.641
0.830
1.204
0.203
0.223
2.245
0.027
0.905
1.105
0.439
0.230
2.302
0.023
0.893
1.119
Amount of
Handling
Cost
1.012
344
U i ai bpi OUCi
(1)
Qi
eU i
eU i
(2)
X Ae LS
(4)
X i X Qi
(5)
OUCi COi f (
xi
)
CAPi
(6)
i ( pi ci ) X i f i
(7)
LS ln(
eU i )
i ( pi ci ) X i
(8)
(3)
345
i
0 , i - each terminal
pi
(9)
p1 1 /b ( Q1 1 Q1 c1
(10)
standard.
Standard
Coefficient
error
()
Cost per
Standard.
Coefficient T-value
()
Significant
probability
NG
HN
PN
29.03
46.92
21.98
30.65
34.86
29.71
16.51
33.55
8.23
20.57
22.12
29.71
12.52
13.37
13.76
10.08
12.74
41.70
48.67
37.75
36.08
49.41
40.05
2442165
1924872
1206712
2322429
1785695
2804030
488433
384974
402237
580607
446424
467338
Marginal
cost per
TEU (US $)
Rental cost
Constant
29.323
0.429
Cost
-0.023
0.007
-0.537
68.287
0.000
per TEU
-3.245
0.003
(US $)
346
TEU (US $)
NonModel
Handling
charge per
TEU (US $)
Annual
average
handling
quantity
Handling
quantity per
one berth
Logsum Parameter
(TEU)
(Theta)
13127533
0.01
Price Parameter
-0.023
NG
HN
PN
Sum
Demand
2.4
mil
1.9
mil
1.2
mil
2.3
mil
2.1
mil
3.2
mil
13.1
mil
Rental
Cost
(US $)
30.6
mil
25.8
mil
16.6
mil
23.4
mil
22.8
mil
119.1
mil
Handling
Charge
per TEU
(US $)
41.7
48.7
37.8
36.1
49.4
40.1
254
Q1
0.19
0.15
0.09
0.18
0.15
0.25
X1
2.5
mil
1.9
mil
1.2
mil
2.3
mil
2.0
mil
3.2
mil
13.2
mil
12.52
13.37
13.76
10.10
11.27
61
19
16
14
17
17
17
100
Marginal
cost: C
14.39
23.83
11.80
2.92
22.24
29.71
105
X1/CAP
1.22
1.13
1.54
1.48
1.26
1.17
CAP
2.0
mil
1.7
mil
0.78
mil
1.6
mil
1.6
mil
2.8
mil
10.4
mil
Vessel/ca
rgo delay
cost
(US $)
$3.63
$2.70
$6.38
$5.93
$4.02
$3.06
26
Profit
(US $)
$36.2
mil
$22.1
mil
$14.7
mil
$53.5
mil
$32.1
mil
$33.3
mil
$191.8
mil
Lease
charge
(US $)
C0
Number of
Number of
Vessel size Capital cost + vessel per Weighted Waiting rate
days
Annual
(TEU)
fuel cost
day
value
(%)
docked waiting cost
(average)
(days)
($)
1000
29224
0.1300
0.017
363
93778
2700
39460
0.2300
0.017
363
224028
4024
49015
0.2100
0.017
363
254075
5300
59965
0.1700
0.017
363
251630
6400
86037
0.1700
0.017
363
361034
8400
100718
0.0800
0.017
363
198889
9000
104724
0.0029
0.017
363
7597
10000
113825
0.0007
0.017
363
2065
Total
1393096
1.7%
1.9%
2.8%
3.1%
5.3%
7.1%
Handling
quantity
per one 296923 344934 418796 485361 565753 591715 595013 602862 639321
berth
NG
HN
PN
Price/
TEU
$
67.47
$
75.54
$
64.69
$
56.75
$
73.66
$
79.41
User Cost
22.6
18.7
20.4
22.9
21.0
20.1
Q1
(Market
Share)
0.183
0.161
0.180
0.194
0.156
0.127
X1
(Terminal
Through.)
2.4
mil
2.1
mil
2.4
mil
2.6
mil
2.0
mil
1.7
mil
13.1
mil
Profit
$97
mil
$81
mil
$92
mil
$112
mil
$82
mil
$83
mil
$547
mil
Handled
ratio
container
0.017
Waiting
Waiting
CAP
X/CAP
Cost
Cost/TEU
296923
400000
0.74
1,393,096
4.692
0.019
344934
400000
0.86
1,556,990
4.514
0.028
418796
400000
1.05
2,294,512
5.479
0.031
485361
400000
1.21
2,540,352
5.234
0.053
565753
400000
1.41
4,343,183
7.677
0.071
591715
400000
1.48
5,818,226
9.833
0.113
595013
400000
1.49
9,259,994
15.563
0.13
602862
400000
1.51
10,653,090
17.671
0.594
639321
400000
1.60
48,676,427
76.138
Sum
X 1
) 17.209
CAP
348
Figure 5. Profits in current competition state and the profits in equilibrium of six container terminals in Busan Port
5. CONCLUSION
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
349
350
1. INTRODUCTION
351
The most widely used DEA models, named DEACCR, deserve greater attention, especially since they are
utilised later in this paper. Formally, let inputs be
xk ( x1k , x2 k , xMk ) RM
to
produce
outputs
respectively. Let
k (1 , 2 , k ) R
be a non-
max
U,
(1)
subject to U y y 0
(2)
X ' x ' k 0
0 (DEA-CCR)
(3)
(4)
'
'
Inefficient < 1
Improvement
not require
Improvement
require
352
Efficiency
Value
Analysis
Sensitivity
Analysis
Y 0 1 X 1 r 1 X r 1
(5)
Eliminating
duplication factors
Literature
Research
Survey
Interview
Deciding input /
independent
variables
Establishing
output /
dependent
variable
Collecting data
Regression analysis
Sensitivity
Analysis
3. RESULT ANALYSIS
3.1 Data Collection and Standardization of Variables
Var.
Term.
UNIT
HIT
Shekou
COSCO
DPI
BICT
CS-4
MTL
PCTC
NBCT
HBCT
KX3-1
Chiwan
KBCT
ACT
HGCT
DPCT
NBSCT
Hanjin
Yantian
ICT
Nansha
JUCT
UTC
DBE2-1
KIT2-2
HKTL
GICT1
SGCT
Average
YA/
Ber.
ha.
15.0
13.2
20.0
17.3
9.3
13.8
14.9
16.8
14.9
25.2
17.5
16.7
14.3
22.9
12.9
12.3
21.0
9.6
37.2
12.3
7.4
6.9
8.4
20.7
21.0
21.0
17.6
12.2
16.2
QC/
Ber.
/
4.0
4.3
3.6
4.1
4.1
4.1
4.0
4.9
3.5
3.3
4.0
4.0
4.0
2.8
2.8
2.8
3.0
2.0
3.0
3.3
2.5
3.0
3.0
2.0
2.0
2.5
2.0
1.5
3.2
TC/
Ber.
/
16.0
15.1
11.2
10.5
11.8
12.0
13.0
14.0
16.0
10.7
14.5
8.0
10.0
9.2
6.8
10.8
8.0
6.0
8.0
10.0
6.5
6.5
7.0
5.0
6.0
8.5
3.8
3.5
9.6
YT
Ber.
/
37.5
27.7
20.4
23.3
23.3
23.3
23.0
30.7
17.0
16.7
27.5
50.0
30.0
14.6
12.6
14.4
12.0
10.0
15.0
16.0
11.5
7.0
7.0
15.0
15.0
11.5
4.0
4.0
18.6
BL
m
15.0
13.2
20.0
17.3
9.3
13.8
14.9
16.8
14.9
25.2
17.5
16.7
14.3
22.9
12.9
12.3
21.0
9.6
37.2
12.3
7.4
6.9
8.4
20.7
21.0
21.0
17.6
12.2
323
Thr./
Ber.
TEU
877000
817143
700000
700000
692083
655556
650570
640000
632997
600000
600000
589000
588000
468353
420594
409165
403603
355991
333333
284868
279569
172448
169952
166371
124590
76120
51638
14772
445490
353
YA/
Ber.
0.96
1.12
1.16
1.10
1.04
1.06
1.01
1.01
1.03
0.98
0.93
0.86
0.90
0.87
0.87
0.79
0.78
0.70
0.71
0.66
0.66
0.65
0.50
0.49
0.35
0.33
0.18
0.10
11
QC/
Ber.
1.21
1.12
1.14
1.10
1.08
1.03
1.01
1.03
1.03
0.98
0.93
0.91
0.90
0.90
0.88
0.80
0.76
0.75
0.73
0.66
0.66
0.65
0.52
0.49
0.35
0.31
0.18
0.10
9
TC/
Ber.
1.21
1.04
1.16
0.71
1.08
1.04
1.03
0.97
1.03
0.90
0.90
0.88
0.90
0.73
0.88
0.79
0.78
0.72
0.69
0.66
0.61
0.65
0.50
0.40
0.35
0.30
0.18
0.10
21
YT
Ber.
1.21
1.08
1.16
1.10
0.83
1.03
0.97
0.95
0.92
0.91
0.77
0.90
0.84
0.90
0.85
0.68
0.73
0.69
0.74
0.43
0.63
0.38
0.47
0.49
0.19
0.33
0.15
0.06
20
BL
1.21
1.06
1.15
1.10
1.07
1.06
1.03
1.03
1.01
0.98
0.93
0.91
0.90
0.90
0.89
0.80
0.75
0.75
0.74
0.66
0.66
0.65
0.52
0.49
0.35
0.33
0.18
0.10
6
354
Var.
Eff.
Term.
Scores
HIT
1.21
Shekou
1.12
COSCO
1.16
DPI
1.10
BICT
1.08
CS-4
1.06
MTL
1.03
PCTC
1.03
NBCT
1.03
HBCT
0.98
KX3-1
0.93
Chiwan
0.91
KBCT
0.90
ACT
0.90
HGCT
0.89
DPCT
0.80
NBSCT
0.78
Hanjin
0.75
Yantian
0.74
ICT
0.66
Nansha
0.66
JUCT
0.65
UTC
0.52
DBE2-1
0.49
KIT2-2
0.35
HKTL
0.33
GICT1
0.18
SGCT
0.10
Decrease effi. No.
Adjusted
Std. Error of
R Square
the Estimate
1
.918a
.843
.807
108471.39050
2
.917b
.840
.812
107046.06097
3
.910c
.828
.806
108838.28056
4
.901d
.812
.797
111440.03923
a. Predictors: (Constant), Berth Length, YT, YA, TC, QC
b. Predictors: (Constant), Berth Length, YT, TC, QC
c. Predictors: (Constant), YT, TC, QC
d. Predictors: (Constant), YT, TC
e. Dependent Variable: Throughput
Model
R Square
Model
1
Regression
Residual
Total
Regression
Residual
Total
Regression
Residual
Total
Regression
Residual
Total
Sum of
Squares
1.390E12
2.589E11
1.649E12
1.386E12
2.636E11
1.649E12
1.365E12
2.843E11
1.649E12
1.339E12
3.105E11
1.649E12
Mean
Square
2.780E11
1.177E10
Sig.
23.6
.000a
3.464E11
1.146E10
30.2
.000b
4.549E11
1.185E10
38.4
.000c
6.693E11
1.242E10
53.9
.000d
Models
Ustd.
Coefficients
(Constant)
-75592.627
YA
.233
QC
92825.355
1
TC
34056.108
YT
5679.013
Berth length
-765.770
(Constant)
-65849.041
QC
85529.610
2 TC
34277.077
YT
6010.075
BerthLength
-632.240
(Constant)
-232134.707
QC
79042.594
3
TC
32715.465
YT
5905.614
(Constant)
-133732.596
4 TC
43582.420
YT
8693.668
a. Dependent Variable: Throughput
Model
Beta
.059
.325
.492
.238
-.15
.300
.496
.252
-.12
.277
.473
.248
.630
.365
t
-.490
.632
1.705
3.260
1.774
-1.47
-.434
1.628
3.327
1.929
-1.35
-2.59
1.486
3.143
1.864
-2.18
5.745
3.327
Sig
.629
.534
.102
.004
.090
.156
.668
.117
.003
.066
.192
.016
.150
.004
.075
.039
.000
.003
Order of Significance
Output
Variable
Data
Envelopment
Analysis
Input
Variables
Dependent
Variable
Regression
Analysis
Independent
Variables
1
2
3
4
5
5. CONCLUSIONS
355
356
[12] Min, H. and Park, B.-I.: Evaluating the intertemporal efficiency trends of international container
ports using data envelopment analysis, International
Journal of Integrated Supply Management, Vol. 1,
No. 3, pp. 258277, 2005.
[13] Notteboom, T., Coeck, C., van den Broeck, J.:
Measuring and explaining the relative efficiency of
container ports by means of Bayesian stochastic
frontier models, International Journal of Maritime
Economics, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 83106, 2000.
[14] Park. N. K.: Critical Factors for Container Port
Productivity, Journal of Korean Navigation and
Port Research, 2008.
[15] Park. N. K. and Bo, LU: A Study on Productivity
Factors of Chinese Container Ports, Journal of
Korean Navigation and Port Research, Vol. 34, No.
7, 2010.
[16] Ramos Rios, L., Gastaud Macada, A.C.: Analysing
the relative efficiency of container ports of
Mercosur using DEA, Maritime Economics &
Logistics, 2006.
[17] Ryon, D.-K.: Efficiency measurement of container
ports in Korea using DEA, The Korean Association
of Shipping and Logistics, 2005.
[18] Song, D. W., Cullinane, K. P. B., and Wang, T.: An
application of DEA window analysis to container
port production efficiency, International association
of maritime economists annual conference, 2003.
[19] Tongzon, J. L.: Efficiency measurement of selected
Australian and other international ports using data
envelopment analysis, Transportation Research A:
Policy and Practice, Vol. 35, No. 2, pp. 113128,
2001.
[20] Tongzon, J., Heng, W.: Port privatization,
efficiency and competitiveness: some empirical
evidence
from
container
ports
(ports),
Transportation Research A: Policy and Practice,
Vol. 39, No. 5, pp. 405424, 2005.
Bo LU
Affiliation-Professor
Dalian University
Institute of Electronic Commerce and
Modern Logistics
Yun Fu HUO
Affiliation-Professor
Dalian University
Institute of Electronic Commerce and
Modern Logistics
1. INTRODUCTION
357
358
Y g (D
k
jk
),
where,
Yk g ( D jk ) is the decay
Pi kij
M iai M j j
EDijb
(1)
GDPi
Qtotal i
kij
Qindustry i
Qindustry i Qindustry j
(2)
Pi kij
paper, the
(4)
EDij2
Qi Q j
(3)
359
City
Industry
Farming
Animal Husbandry
Aquatic Products
Food Processing
Food Manufacturing
Textile & Garment
Furniture Manufacturing
Plastic Products
Special Equipment Manufacturing
Fabricated Metal Products
General Equipment Manufacturing
Transportation Equipment Manufacturing
Electrical Machinery Manufacturing
Communications and Electronic Equipment
Flow of Commerce
P.L.D.
206.74
126.52
57.19
32.41
16.63
0.99
73.22
7.95
1.40
8.90
360
Y.K.
275.39
42.66
74.47
86.56
41.26
2.29
169.83
23.14
4.03
79.01
D.D.
191.64
90.01
106.09
200.92
173.94
5.42
131.44
187.53
66.05
39.27
D.L.
644.47
296.69
249.43
322.82
182.97
10.65
673.38
83.01
21.53
447.10
Z.H.
W.F.D.
185.44
63.49
74.09
187.57
78.51
1.56
370.69
13.15
1.78
100.46
6.31
18.14
1.61
1.17
42.24
A.S.
518.36
159.77
-742.30
75.38
2.43
76.48
89.27
31.45
16.26
426.76
114.89
11.82
51.57
23.29
1.32
93.46
12.46
2.37
16.56
4.17
31.21
5.83
0.42
50.79
P.J.
334.25
43.89
64.85
268.60
18.12
0.08
2.85
42.45
33.66
5.64
7.14
56.21
9.85
3.56
126.18
H.L.D.
375.64
68.50
77.41
190.84
147.46
4.92
165.64
5.85
67.75
29.90
118.24
118.59
262.25
7.43
106.73
Y.T.
984.30
232.80
178.32
221.41
151.21
24.19
106.82
27.00
0.30
3.35
7.22
61.88
0.11
520.86
298.54
S.Y.S.
383.60
125.76
0.62
42.86
116.57
2.02
61.04
2.59
41.30
23.30
71.80
60.80
72.07
3.18
71.19
115.28
110.95
211.57
10.07
121.27
S.Y.
1075.67
431.18
27.01
1460.33
155.73
4.85
117.85
175.64
61.86
35.16
107.97
99.49
189.72
9.01
375.03
W.H.
249.42
58.33
164.55
271.70
0.98
56.27
51.47
10.40
0.15
1.46
0.77
126.92
13.23
149.285
113.97
Y.J.
44.60
7.30
-60.62
14.49
1.41
25.01
4.23
22.14
13.93
41.50
37.12
72.25
5.92
26.49
37.03
195.65
53.49
16.98
317.69
F.S.
72.76
43.96
-315.08
30.82
0.99
31.13
37.90
13.35
6.66
23.30
23.36
50.42
1.69
108.93
T.H.
272.15
136.87
-48.06
23.77
1.33
95.64
12.84
2.43
41.28
4.22
31.61
5.90
1.21
98.19
J.X.
327.47
28.39
3.00
90.13
64.53
2.22
57.45
4.45
33.30
22.16
57.91
56.07
96.73
3.62
99.59
54.89
55.05
123.85
4.11
169.53
T.L.
886.01
267.17
-261.54
151.75
4.78
129.34
244.11
84.49
33.65
150.05
111.91
208.73
8.57
134.14
B.S.
16.85
49.44
-42.80
20.80
1.20
86.50
10.80
1.95
13.82
4.07
25.85
5.17
0.35
58.81
M.D.J.
341.68
76.76
3.14
133.22
116.12
3.70
86.83
4.42
59.89
35.74
104.43
75.42
141.31
6.73
363.69
1.80
27.05
8.75
4.57
72.08
F.X.
323.03
651.60
1.89
90.02
57.68
1.84
55.31
2.16
33.20
12.56
57.95
48.99
89.39
3.18
115.07
H.G.
133.65
25.29
0.48
72.12
49.00
1.68
43.49
2.20
31.45
34.74
85.11
42.87
73.47
6.39
52.83
Q.T.H.
252.96
31.66
-25.80
0.12
6.46
5.98
1.16
0.04
0.21
0.18
20.75
1.35
165.40
42.76
City
GDP
W.F.D.
1539.18
A.S.
4447.38
F.S.
1734.42
W.H.
3840.16
S.Y.S.
922.65
P.L.D.
927.89
P.J.
1543.76
T.L.
1880.96
T.H.
1544.63
Y.J.
446.14
Y.K.
2343.36
J.Z.
1543.76
F.X.
885.07
B.S.
1284.77
J.X.
808.02
D.D.
1393.76
H.L.D.
1051.56
C.Y.
1833.49
H.G.
535.48
M.D.J.
1572.03
Z.H.
1438.02
D.L.
10546.39
S.Y.
10212.62
Y.T.
7985.08
J.M.S.
958.94
Q.T.H.
799.45
Y.K.
3535.49
J.Z.
41031.00
F.X.
22749.33
B.S.
2652.25
J.X.
17715.61
Judging leading
industries
D.L.
4830.57
S.Y.
17509.48
Y.T.
12100.51
J.M.S.
10261.69
Q.T.H.
17768.89
GDP;
Total cargo quantity;
Industry cargo quantity;
City logistics scale;
Economic distance;
Collecting cargo
quantity data
Calculating leading
industry logistics
requirements potential
values
Predicting cargo
quantity data in
future
Applying normalization
process to obtain
potential value weight
weights
Identifying scope of
logistics system
D.D.
1005.71
H.L.D.
49188.79
C.Y.
52573.22
H.G.
6642.25
M.D.J.
16205.29
Industry
C.Q.
Log.R.
Farming
185.44
245.99
Animal H.
63.49
95.15
Aquatic P.
74.09
90.99
Food P.
187.57
259.06
Food M.
78.51
87.62
T. & A.
1.56
3.30
F. M.
370.69
429.23
Plastic P.
13.15
36.58
Special E. M.
1.78
9.48
F. M. P.
100.46
105.05
General E. M.
6.31
22.34
T. E.M.
18.14
25.07
E. M. M.
1.61
11.67
C. & E.E.
1.17
13.47
F. C.
42.24
51.76
Sum
1146.21 1486.76
C.Q.: Cargo quantity.
Log. R.: Logistics requirements
Var.: Variation.
Var.
60.55
31.66
16.9
71.49
9.11
1.74
58.54
23.43
7.7
4.59
16.03
6.93
10.06
12.3
9.52
340.55
Rank
13
12
4
8
6
14
3
10
16
3
15
15
25
16
15
--
361
362
Aida Huerta
PhD Candidate
University National of Mexico
Department of Operations Research
1. INTRODUCTION
363
2. METHODOLOGY
364
K 1.15 N1/3 , N 25
(1)
Factor
4. MODEL VALIDATION
Var
Level [-1]
Level [1]
X1
Empirical
distribution
(see Fig. 5)
Empirical
distribution
(see Fig. 6)
Unloading/Loading
time of Ro-Ro /Pax
X2
0.5 minutes
1.5 minutes
Numbers of cars
Numbers of trucks
X3
X4
50
50
100
100
Ro-Ro/Pax ships
Ships per week
Service Time
Real value
[Min-Max]
3.46
[3.32 4.30]
7.42 hours
365
Source
X1, X,X3,X4
X 1 X 2, X 1 X 3, X 1 X 4,
X 2 X 3, X 2 X 4, X 3 X 4
X 1 X 2 X 3, X 2 X 3 X 4,
X 1 X 3 X 4, X 1 X 3 X 4
X1 X2 X3 X4
Residual error
Total
DF
Adj MS
0,424
8,253
8,78
1
0
15
2,83
0
0
0
0
0
Source
Constant
X1
X2
X3
X4
X1X2
X1X3
X1X4
366
Effect
Coefficient
10,694
0,119
0,488
-0,2363
-0,3400
-1,3520
2,4935
0,7887
0,0595
0,2441
-0,1181
-0,1700
-0,6760
1,2467
0,3944
0,7024
0,4615
-0,4707
1,0200
-0,9684
-0,2191
-0,4110
0,4209
1,4048
0,9230
-0,9415
2,0400
-1,9367
-0,4383
-0,8220
0,8418
Y j 1 j x j i j xi x j
j k
(2)
i j
(3)
13
Un/Loading time
12
11
6. SIMULATION RESULTS
X2X3
X2X4
X3X4
X1X2X3
X1X2X4
X1X3X4
X2X3X4
X1X2X3X4
10
9
-1
-1
Cars
13
1
Trucks
12
11
10
9
-1
-1
CONCLUSION
367
368
Branislav Dragovi
Professor
Maritime Faculty
University of Montenegro
Romeo Metrovi
Professor
Maritime Faculty
University of Montenegro
Marko Mikijeljevi
MSc Student
University of Montenegro
Maritime Faculty
Stevo Markolovi
MSc Student
University of Montenegro
Maritime Faculty
1. INTRODUCTION
Ri 1 ( ) , i 1,2,3,4 .
Cb cb nb .
(1)
C s c s ns ,
(2)
369
TC C b C s cb nb c s n s .
(3)
R rnb Lq 2
ts
ns
(4)
(12)
(5)
t s is the
t s Wq
Lq
nb 4 and nb 5.
3. THE CASE OF
TC s
TC
cb nb
cs
ns
cb nb
cs t s ,
(6)
Lq 1
TC s
cs
.
cb nb
(7)
dt s
.
d
c s , we obtain the
AC
ACc
cs
cs
(11)
370
M / M / 1 holds
and Dragovi [6]) that
1,
(13)
Lq
p ( n)
n nb
(9)
nb 4,5
AC s TC s MC s ,
M / M / nb QUEUE WITH
where
where
where
dLq
nb nb 1 nb 1
(nb 1)!(1 ) 2
p ( 0) ,
nb 1 ( / ) n ( / ) nb
where p(0)
n
!
n
!
1
/(
n
)
b
b
n 0
Substituting
formulae, we obtain
Lq
n 1
b
( nb 1)!(nb ) 2
nb 1 n
nb
n
!
(
n
1
)!
(
n
0
n
b
b
(14)
Taking
where
5
Lq (4)
.
(4 )(24 18 6 2 3 )
g 4 ( )
(15)
R4 4r
2 (4 )(2304 1728 432 2 60 3 6 )
(4 ) 2 (24 18 6 2 3 ) 2
4r g 4 ( ) r cb / cs
Similarly, for
that
6
(5 )(120 96 36 2 8 3 4 )
Lq (5)
(18)
(16)
g 5 ( )
g m ( ) , m 4,5 ,
for (0,4) g nb ( ) , nb 4,5 , for (0,4)
The graphics of the functions
in
Rnb ( 0.6nb g nb ( ))
for models
40
g nb ( )
nb
g4
30
g5
20
10
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
Rnb
are
0.15
0.35
0.55
0.75
0.95
1.15
1.35
1.55
1.75
1.95
2.15
0.9841
1.9669
4.5383
15.6000
399.6
-
1.5034
1.9450
2.4874
3.2311
4.3685
6.3332
10.311
20.6357
64.9156
1600.94
-
2.1001
2.5037
2.9215
3.3721
3.8834
4.4976
5.2816
6.3490
7.9079
10.3797
14.7326
2.7000
3.1003
3.5024
3.9101
4.3304
4.7736
5.2547
5.7953
6.4260
7.1928
8.1663
3.3000
3.7000
4.1000
4.5013
4.9047
5.3133
5.7313
6.1652
6.6237
7.1191
7.6678
of
functions
nb 1,2,3,4.
371
REFERENCES
Rnb ( )
R1
R2
R3
15
R4
10
R5
5
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
nb 1,2,3,4.
5. CONCLUSION
solutions
of
equations Ri ( )
Ri 1 ( ) ,
372
M X a / M / c ( )
Queueing
Systems,
International Journal of Informatics and
Management Sciences, Vol. 16, No. 3, pp. 1-17,
2005.
[11] kuri M., Dragovi, B. and Metrovi, R.: Some
Results of Queuing Approaches at Container Yard,
International Journal of Decision Sciences, Risk
and Management, Vol. 3, No. 3/4, pp. 260-273,
2011.
[12]Taniguchi, E., Noritake, M., Yamada, T. and
Izumitani, T.: Optimal Size and Location Planning
of Public Logistics Terminals, Transportation
research part E, Vol. 35, No. 3, pp. 207-222, 1999.
Romeo Mestrovi
Professor
Maritime Faculty
University of Montenegro
Branislav Dragovi
Professor
Maritime Faculty
University of Montenegro
Boidar Grandis
MSc Student
Maritime Faculty
University of Montenegro
Mauro Petranovi
BSc
Maritime Faculty
Maritime Secondary School
Bar, Montenegro
1. INTRODUCTION
1,2,3,4,5 ) with
and
373
AC
ACs ,
cs
cs
(1)
hk ( ) (1 2 k 1 2k k 1 k 2 k 1 3 k 2 3k k 2
2k 2 k 2 6 k 3 k 2 k 3 3 k 4 k k 4 k 2 k 2
2 2 k 3 2k 2 k 3 4 2 k 4 k 2 k 4 2 2 k 5 ) /( 1) 2 ( k 1 1) 2
(6)
In particular,
respectively:
(6)
h1 ( ) 1 2
(7)
2 6 10 10 4 1 ,
(8)
( 2 1) 2
2 7 7 6 12 5 18 4 20 3 10 2 4 1
h3 ( )
(1 ) 2 (1 2 ) 2
(9)
2 9 8 8 14 7 21 6 30 5 35 4 20 3 10 2 4 1 ,
h ( )
5
h2 ( )
( 4 3 2 1) 2
k 1,2,3,4,5 becomes,
for
(10)
h5 ( )
2 11 9 10 16 9 24 8 34 7 47 6 56 5 35 420 3 10 2 4 1
( 1) 2 ( 2 1) 2 ( 2 1) 2
(11)
3. NUMERICAL EXAMPLE
,
(2)
R rnb Lq
d
values of
dLq
R rnb Lq 2
dLq
d
(3)
p0
where
1
,
1 k 1
(4)
terminal. Furthermore,
Lq L p 0
(3)
(k 1) k 1
1
(k 1) k 1 1 .
k 1
k 1
1
1
1
1 k 1
Differentiating (5) by
with
nb 1 ,
(5)
, and substituting this into
under
the
notation
R Rk ( ) r hk ( ) , we find that
374
R Rk ( ) 0.6 hk ( )
M / M / 1 / k , k 1,2,3,4,5 ( r 0.6 )
for the
0.15
1.9
1.95438
1.97603
1.98218
1.98367
0.25
2.1
2.22925
2.31287
2.35259
2.36874
0.35
2.3
2.51596
2.70324
2.8266
2.89714
0.45
2.5
2.80422
3.12371
3.38751
3.58028
0.55
2.7
3.08807
3.55098
3.99845
4.38962
0.65
2.9
3.36453
3.96703
4.61525
5.25855
0.75
3.1
3.63251
4.36073
5.19998
6.10567
0.85
3.3
3.89201
4.72713
5.72873
6.86399
0.95
3.5
4.14359
5.06563
6.19233
7.49823
k 1,2,3,...,10
and
( k , ) hk ( ) h(k , )
(0,1)
R1' ( ) r
(2 )
r g1 ( ) .
(1 ) 2
h1 ( ) h2 ( ) h3 ( ) h4 ( ) h5 ( ) .
Therefore, it is not possible to define the optimal
intervals for specific cost ratio in the same manner as
for the models M / M / m (cf. [5]). Further, a direct
calculation
gives
for
each
lim hk ( ) 1
0
k 1,2,3,4,5 , and
lim h1 ( ) 3 , lim h2 ( ) 11 / 3 , lim h3 ( ) 37 / 8 ,
1
4 0.508699
Hence,
the
k 2 as k .
k 3 9k 2 26k 36
h( k )
12k 12
12
5 0.538229 , respectively.
and
k .
Notice
that
since
3
2
2
h' (k ) (k 6k 9k 5) /(6(k 1) ) 0 for all
k 1 , it follows that h(k ) is strictly increasing
function for 1 k .
Remark: The previous considerations show that, for
given traffic intensity (or its range), the optimal port
capacity of a M / M / 1 / k queue in the sense of
g1 ( ) and hk ( )
k 1,2,3,4,5 on the range (0,1)
375
REFERENCES
376
M X a / M / c ( )
Queueing
Systems,
International Journal of Informatics and
Management Sciences, Vol. 16, No. 3, pp. 1-17,
2005.
[11] kuri, M., Dragovi, B. and Metrovi, R.: Some
Results of Queuing Approaches at Container Yard,
International Journal of Decision Sciences, Risk
and Management, Vol. 3, No. 3/4, pp. 260-273,
2011.
[12]Taniguchi, E., Noritake, M., Yamada, T. and
Izumitani, T.: Optimal Size and Location Planning
of Public Logistics Terminals, Transportation
research part E, Vol. 35, No. 3, pp. 207-222, 1999.
[13]Vukadinovi, S.: Elements of Queuing Theory, (in
Serbian), University of Belgrade, Faculty of
Transport and Traffic Engineering, Belgrade, 1983.
[14]Wanhill, S.R.C., Further analysis of optimum size
seaport, Journal of the Waterways, Harbors and
Coastal Engineering Division, Vol. 100, No. 4), pp.
377-383, 1974.
[15]Wanhill, S.R.C., A study in port planning: The
example of Mina Zayed, Maritime Studies and
Management, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 48-55, 1974.
[16]Yamada, T., Frazila, R.B., Yoshizawa, G., Mori, K.,
Optimising the handling capacity in a container
terminal for investigating efficient handling
systems, Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for
Transportation Studies, Vol. 5. No. 1, pp. 597-608,
2003.
Saut Gurning
Lecturer
Sepuluh Nopember Institute of Technology
(ITS) Surabaya, Indonesia
Stephen Cahoon
Deputy Director
Australian Maritime College
University of Tasmania, Australia
Branislav Dragovi
Professor
Maritime Faculty
University of Montenegro, Montenegro
Hong-Oanh Nguyen
Senior Lecturer
Australian Maritime College
University of Tasmania, Australia
1. INTRODUCTION
377
Ri pi ( xi )
Internal
Stages
- Single mitigation, 1
- Multi-mitigations,
1 + 2 +...+ N
Event 1
- Single mitigation, 2
- Multi-mitigations,
1 + 2 +...+ N
Event 2
Possible
Disruptive
Events
0
Normal
State
.
.
.
- Single mitigation, 3
- Multi-mitigations,
1 + 2 +...+ N
Event N
378
(1)
V ji X i DM ji
(2)
(4)
DM j ,i m ( DX j ,i, m .V j ,i , m )
(5)
P11
P21
P31
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
P12
P22
P32
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
P13
P23
P33
P43
P53
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
P34
0
P54
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
P35
P45
0
P65
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
P56
P66
P76
P86
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
P67
P77
P87
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
P78
P88
P98
P108
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
P89
P99
0
0
0
0
0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 P411 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
P810 0 0 0 0
P910 0 0 0 0
0 P1011 0 0 0
P1110 0 P1112 0 0
0 P1211 0 P1213 0
0 0 P1312 0 P1314
0 0 0 P1413 P1414
32
30
21
20
10
F3 (t ) F2 (t ) F1 t F0 (t ) 1
(8)
dF3(t) / dt 32 31 30 F3t F0 t
dF2 (t ) / dt 21 20 F2 t 32F3t
(9)
p c (t ) PX (t ) C where C X
31
(6)
F3 (t ) 1 M (t )
(11)
for i 1,..., N
(12)
379
where the Vi* is the cost for the policy solution (see Eq.
4). The process of disruption policy evaluation is
initially started by solving the steady state cost equation
using Xk as is the optimum disruption management
policy. If
*
process of Vi v i , where
C (acceptable cost
(13)
Vi j 1 pijxi v j qixi
N
for i 1,..., N .
(14)
i lim i (k )
where
N
j 1
(16)
i j 1 pijx j
N
for i 1,..., N .
(15)
Line
1
2
3
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
for each C X, do
Pc(t) P [x(t) > C]
Mt F2(t) + F1(t) + F0(t)
end for
for each i and j N, do
pij Transition probabilities
DMji Transition costs
end for
13
14
15
Vi qixi pijxi v j
j 1
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
380
Process
Else, Vi*
Vji V(Xi, DMji),V R (reward)
for each i=1,N, do
j probabilities of disruption j at period n
i (Pij, j)
end for
end if
return S
Index
State
Name
State
Cost in
US$
Final
Cost in
US$
Step
Value in US$
Action
name
Last
probability
Type
MDP
Farmers
1766596
1775429
2868913
IP
0.215
Title
2006-2007
Handlers
124995
125620
1227312
IP
0.110
States
Min
Processors
124995
125620
1096495
PD
0.099
Goal
14
Aus. shippers
1833260
1842426
2449760
PD
0.054
Actions
14
Aus. forwarders
1999920
2009920
3102237
IP
0.042
Action/state
14
Aus. shipping
999960
1004960
1124955
CS
0.039
Events
Aus. ports
666640
669973
1768957
OCL
0.011
Events/action
Ind. shipping
708305
711847
1533300
CS
0.110
Iteration type
Policy
Ind. ports
374985
376860
1199980
CS
0.046
Policy steps
365
10
Ind. forwarders
1666600
1674993
2491595
CS
0.031
Stop Diff
1.00E-06
11
Consignees
2083250
2093666
2908245
CS
0.024
Value error
3.00E-06
12
Wholesalers
2124915
2135540
3024915
IM
0.004
Prob. error
6.30E-09
13
Retailers
2166580
2177413
2588897
IP
0.001
Time measure
Days
14
Final Con.
2208245
2219286
2616562
IP
0.215
Note: Australian (Aus.); Indonesian (Ind.); Final consumers (Final Con.); Inventory pooling (IP); Postponement delays (PD); Containerised shipment
(CS); Other chain links (OCL); Implication monitoring (IM).
381
Table 2 shows the results of the assessment of multidisruption management scenarios of the study. When
mitigating maritime disruptions on the AustralianIndonesian WSC, MDP proposes strategies (in the
column of action name) that may be implemented by
entities (state name column). State value is a contractual
cost required by each entity when a disruption occurs to
handle the total wheat shipment. The value is calculated
from the total tonnage of monthly wheat shipment
(8,333 tonnes) and contractual costs allocated by
entities. The value of contractual costs is collected from
the 2009 maritime disruption survey interview of 34
senior managers in the Australian-Indonesian WSC.
Final cost is a maximum acceptable cost (C) of all
companies. The level of this cost is obtained from the
value of state costs and the sensitivity factors ranging
from 0.1% - 1%. In this case, 0.5% is applied. While the
step value is actually the minimum costs that will be
occurred from 14 alternatives of scenarios given (see
line 13-21, Table 1). The function of this value is
dependend on action costs, decision value, probabilities,
decision index, and discount value of costs applied
across one year period or 365 days.
Five policy scenarios are recommended: 1)
inventory pooling; 2) postponement delays; 3)
containerised shipment; 4) implication monitoring and
5) other chain links. Of these alternatives, containerised
shipment (CS) is the most essential scenario as it may
generate state and final costs more efficiently,
particularly for entities such as maritime service
providers. The cost reduction as a reward in applying
CS may gain significant maximum step values gained
by Australian shipping operators and Indonesian
shipping and port operators, and forwarders. The MDP
also estimates that farmers and final consumers are
entities that may experience a higher likelihood of
maritime disruptions of less than 22% compared to
retailers (0.1%).
382
5. CONCLUSION
REFERENCES
383
384
Maja kuri
PhD Student
University of Montenegro
Maritime Faculty
Davorin Kofja
Assistant Professor
University of Maribor
Faculty of Organizational Sciences
Branislav Dragovi
Professor
University of Montenegro
Maritime Faculty
Sanja Papan
MSc Student
University of Montenegro
Maritime Faculty
1. INTRODUCTION
385
386
Ganji et al. [4] and Imai et al. [7] give the model
formulation for minimizing service time of container
ships taking into account continuous BAP. This model
is proposed and applied for numerical example in
Section 4. Continuous BAP is formulated as mix-integer
nonlinear programming model
Min Z
(t
F
i
Ai )
(1)
iV
(2)
Ci CM i pi M i i i V ,
(3)
(4)
i, j ( i ) V ,
(5)
where
11/2/11 4:48
11/2/11 0:00
4. NUMERICAL EXAMPLE
Arrival time
11/1/11 19:12
11/1/11 14:24
11/1/11 9:36
11/1/11 4:48
11/1/11 0:00
10/31/11 19:12
10/31/11 14:24
1
5
Ships' ID
Ships
ID
No.
of
berth
Ships
length
in m
Service
time
Total no. of
transferred
containers
299
25.25
1615
127
13.50
584
107
3.00
167
142
10.33
500
275
18.17
1696
334
6.50
660
127
12.00
376
276
7.50
462
300
16.83
1615
387
November
1, 2011
Ship
schedule
(Real data)
Ship
schedule
(GA)
1-(2); 2-(1);
3-(1); 4-(1);
5-(4); 6-(5);
7-(2); 8-(3);
9-(5)
1-2*; 2-4*;
3-2*; 4-2*;
5-2*; 6-1*;
7-4*; 8-1*;
9-2*
QCs
assignment
(GA)
1-(5); 2-(2); 3(2); 4-(2); 5(5); 6-(6); 7(2); 8-(5); 9(6)
5. CONCLUSIONS
388
Davorin Kofja
Assistant Professor
University of Maribor
Faculty of Organizational Sciences
Maja kuri
PhD Student
University of Montenegro
Maritime Faculty
Branislav Dragovi
Professor
University of Montenegro
Maritime Faculty
Andrej kraba
Assistant Professor
University of Maribor
Faculty of Organizational Sciences
1. INTRODUCTION
390
- traffic intensity;
Lq - average number of cruise ships in queue;
Lq ( M / D / 1 / m )
p0
pk
1
1 bm 1
bk bk 1
, k 1 ,..., m 1
1 bm 1
bm 1
pm 1
1 bm 1
where the coefficients
(1)
(2)
(3)
(1) k
(n k ) k e( n k ) k , m 1 . (4)
k!
k 0
n
bn
Wq ( M / D / 1 / m )
m 1
bk m
1
m 1 k 0
bm 1
(5)
k
k e
k!
m 1
m 1
bk m
bk m . (6)
(m 1) k 0
m 1 k 0
bm 1
bm 1
b0 1 b1 e ,
Lq ( M / D / 1 / 2 )
while for m 3 ,
1 e 2 1 e e
, (7)
e
e
b0 1 b1 e , b2 e 2 e ,
Lq ( M / D / 1 / 3) 2
1 e e 2 e 3
e 2 e
2e 2 e 2 2 2e e e 2
.
e 2 e
(8)
5. SIMULATION MODEL
391
2011
Average number of
ships
Average number of
ships in queue
Average queue
waiting time
2011
2012
Average number of
ships
Average number of
ships in queue
Average queue
waiting time
2012
Real
Simulation
Real
Simulation
6. OUTPUT RESULTS
2011
2012
392
7. CONCLUSION
2011
M/D/1/m
model
Simulation
model
2012
M/D/1/m
model
Simulation
model
m=2
Lq [ship]
Wq [h]
m=3
Lq [ship]
Wq [h]
0.22
2.43
0.48
5.12
0.24
(0.13)
2.62
(0.53)
0.50
(0.17)
5.29
(0.62)
m=2
Lq [ship]
Wq [h]
m=3
Lq [ship]
Wq [h]
0.20
2.53
0.43
5.19
0.21
(0.12)
2.60
(0.48)
0.48
(0.15)
5.38
(0.70)
2011
M/D/1/m
model
Simulation
model
2012
M/D/1/m
model
Simulation
model
m=2
Lq [ship]
Wq [h]
m=3
Lq [ship]
Wq [h]
0.29
2.78
0.68
6.11
0.30
(0.14)
2.92
(0.48)
0.77
(0.17)
6. 38
(0.59)
m=2
Lq [ship]
Wq [h]
m=3
Lq [ship]
Wq [h]
0.27
2.91
0.67
6.31
0.28
(0.16)
3.05
(0.51)
0.76
(0.19)
6.40
(0.55)
2011
M/D/1/m
model
Simulation
model
2012
M/D/1/m
model
Simulation
model
m=2
Lq [ship]
Wq [h]
m=3
Lq [ship]
Wq [h]
0.37
3.09
0.89
7.01
0.47
(0.20)
3.18
(0.64)
0.95
(0.31)
7.37
(0.72)
m=2
Lq [ship]
Wq [h]
m=3
Lq [ship]
Wq [h]
0.35
3.25
0.84
7.35
0.37
(0.22)
3.45
(0.61)
0.90
(0.25)
7.51
(0.58)
393
394
Nenad Zrni
Associate professor
University of Belgrade
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering
Boris Jerman
Associate professor
University of Ljubljana
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering
The goal of this paper is to present the latest trends in Cargo-HandlingEquipment industry aimed to mitigate environmental impact of container
terminal operations and contribute to the sustainable ports. The each piece
of the most widespread machines for handling containers is described and
dealt separately with the highlight on the green technologies and
improved operating efficiency and emission reductions. In the special
chapter recommendations on methodologies suitable for investigation of
environmental footprint of Cargo-Handling-Equipment without on-site
measuring are given. Additionally, the Life-Cycle-Assessment methodology
as tool for comparison of conventional and state-of-the-art port technology
is underlined with an example.
Keywords: Ports, Cargo-Handling-Equipment, environmental footprint,
green technology, Life-Cycle-Assessment;
1. INTRODUCTION
395
396
397
398
399
4. CONCLUSION
400
Georg Kartnig
Professor
Faculty of Mechanical and Industrial
Engineering
Institute for Engineering Design and
Logistics Engineering
Vienna University of Technology
Bruno Grsel
Professor Emeritus
Faculty of Mechanical and Industrial
Engineering
Institute for Engineering Design and
Logistics Engineering
Vienna University of Technology
Nenad Zrnic
Associate Professor
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering
Department of Material Handling,
Constructions and Logistics
University of Belgrade
1. INTRODUCTION
2. HISTORY OF INTRALOGISTICS
401
402
1.
Demographic change
2.
3.
4.
5.
Cultural diversity
6.
7.
Digitalisation
8.
9.
Ubiquitous intelligence
10.
Convergence of technologies
11.
Globalisation
12.
Knowledge-based economy
13.
Business ecosystems
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
Urbanisation
19.
20.
Globalisation
403
Demographic change
404
405
406
space
energy wastage;
other forms of environmental impacts in ports are:
waste
excavation work and removal of the excavated
material
loads hazardous to the environment
refueling
disposal of wastewater from the ships
Considering that most of our energy resources are
based upon fossil energy sources and therefore necessity
of implementing environmentally friendly technologies
in bulk materials handling industry, there is still an
enormous potential to save energy and costs as well
[11]. Since most of the energy is consumed by electric
motors big costs and energy savings can be achieved by
energetically optimizing drives.
In future, it will be essential to address companywide sustainable logistics concepts. Green logistics will
be expected to prove that it is not merely sustainable but
also efficient.
According to polls of logistics experts, more than
65% rate environmental management as very
important or quite important (Fig. 5). Every fourth
retailer and almost every third service company has
plans to develop environmentally friendly products and
services. Green logistics undoubtedly has excellent
prospects but it is still in its infancy. On average, only
2030% of the managers say that progress has been
made towards implementing it. As would be expected,
public and listed enterprises, and other large companies
are leading the way. [7]
Table 2. Comparison between conventional stacker cranes and shuttle systems [7]
Shuttle system
PROS
CONS
407
Globalisation
Urbanisation
Individualisation
Demographic change
Climate change and environmental impact
Ubiquitous intelligence
408
AUTHORS INDEX
Alil A. .........................................309
Altefrohne M. ...........................195
Anders M. ......................................7
Aniscenko A...............................181
Arizanovi D. ............................171
Arsi M. .....................................155
Batina D. ...................................319
Berbig D. ...................................195
Bjeli N. ....................................231
Bojani G. .................................337
Bojani V. .................................337
Bonjak S. ................. 141, 149, 155
Breiner K. ..................................201
Cahoon S. ..................................377
Clausen U. ................................205
Czmochowski J. .........................39
ovnjuk J. ................................181
uk M. ......................................297
Huo Y. F. ...................................357
Ivanievi N. ..............................171
Panteli M. ................................135
Papan S. ....................................385
Park N. K. .................. 341, 351, 357
Pat B. .......................................247
Pavlovi G. ................................285
Petkovi Z. ........ 101, 113, 141, 149
Petranovi M. ...........................373
Petronijevi P. ..........................171
Petrovi N. .................................177
Pietrusiak D. ........ 39, 119, 125, 161
Pjevevi D. ..............................331
Popovi D. .................................231
Prenner M. .................................25
Przybylek G. .............................119
Janevski J. ...............................167
Janoevi D. ..............................177
Jerman B. 89,107,141,297,319,395
Jodin D. ............................. 243, 303
Jokanovi S. ..............................293
Jovanovi M. ..............................95
Jovanovi Z. .............................257
Kartnig G. ............................55,401
Kessler F. ....................................25
Kofja D. ........................... 385, 389
Kker M. ..................................195
Komljenovi D. .........................135
Kosani N. .................................251
Kovcs Z. ..................................247
Kraft M. ....................................263
Kriak L. ..................................135
Krhn T. ...................................215
Landschtzer C. ........................303
Langerholc M. ..........................107
Leonhardt T. ................................7
Lien H Jr. ..................................83
Lodewijks G. ........................61, 65
Lommen S. ..................................61
Longo F. ....................................363
Lottersberger F. .......................209
Lu B. .................................. 351, 357
Lyridis D. ..................................325
Marinkovi D. ..........................227
Marinkovi Z. ................... 227, 273
Markolovi S. ............................369
Markos P. ...................................77
Markovi D. ........................95, 273
Markovi G. ..................... 227, 273
Malak P. ...................................125
Metrovi R. .......................369,373
Mihajlovi V. ............................149
Mikijeljevi M. .........................369
Milenovi I. ...............................141
Milievi M. ..............................221
Milojevi G. ..............................149
Miodrag Z..................................205
Mikovi V. ...............................221
Mitrovi B. ................................185
Moczko P. .................................119
Nguyen H. O. ............................377
Nikitakos N. ................................51
Nikoli V. ..................................177
Nuric S. .....................................135
Oduori M. F. .............................313
Ognjanovi M. ..........................279
409
AUTHORS INDEX
Wolfschluckner A. ....................303
Zacharioudakis P. .....................325
Zadek H. ....................................263
Zamiralova M. ............................65
Zdravkovi N. ................... 101, 285
Zeli A. ........................................83
Zrni N. ..................... 107, 113, 221
............ 251, 319, 395, 401
410