Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Page 1 of2
Per your direction on Friday, attached is a draft letter to Secretary Duncan regarding Race to The Top waivers.
Since you were the ones who spoke with Sec. Duncan, I want to get your feedback on the letter before I share
with the rest of the group. Is it line with your expectations? If so, I will circulate to the rest of the chiefs for their
approval.
Thanks,
Jaryn
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/O/h/f9rriucnxkxk/?&v=pt&s=q&q=from:levesque+to:cerf&s... 3/6/2012
Page 2 of2
Gmail- Draft letter to Duncan on Race to the Top waivers- for your review
Chris,
We are really taking your, deb and Eric's lead on this. The other chiefs seemed to indicate secty Duncan
wanted a public statement on rttt waivers. So we did a draft.
We don't want to do letter if that is not what was discussed with Arne. Will you pis follow back with deb and
Eric so there is agreement on what we do?
Thanks
Patricia
Sent from my iPhone
(Quoted text hidden)
yes
Page 1 of 1
On behalf of more than 11 million in our states, the Chiefs for Change support the important reforms
advanced by Race to the Top. This competition challenged states to set ambitious goals, rethink many
existing laws and regulations, and forge new and important partnerships.
By insisting that states set ambitious goals, you ensured that funds were awarded to support states
implementing rigorous standards and strong accountability systems. As the Department works with
states to implement Race to the Top, we want to express our concern about potential changes to state
plans that threaten to weaken its accountability provisions. We understand that implementation plans
and scope of work may require adjustments, such as with the timelines. However, these revisions
must not come at the expense of holding districts and schools accountable for improving the academic
achievement of all students
Race to the Top will serve as an important catalyst for not only state reforms, but also for providing
models that can help inform the reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act
(ESEA). We look forward to continue working with you and your staff in furthering the education
reform our country needs and our students deserve.
Sincerely,
3/6/2012
Page 1 of6
PM
Patricia
https://mail.google.cornlmail/u/O/h/f9rriucnxkxk/?&v=pt&s=q&q=from:levesque+to:cerf&s... 3/6/2012
Page 2 of6
I have an interview then, but if you can round up the others, let's do it!
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
Thanks for the notification. How about today between 3:30-4:00 pm/EST?
HiTia,
Thanks so very much for the follow up. Sadly (happily for me!), I go on vacation on the 27th through August
8th.
Because I am on a canoing expedition in in far northern Canada (near Hudson's Bay), I am quite
literally off the grid - no phones, no bberrries, no nuthin' (hallelujiah!) Depending on other folks' timing, my
Deputy Andy Smarick could very ably fill in for me on the 28th if you think it best to proceed before I return.
Best,
Chris
On Tue, Jul26, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Borders, Tia <Tia.Borders@ed.gov> wrote:
Page 3 of6
Arne asked that I contact you regarding setting up a 15-20 minute phone call with Eric and Deb.
Please let me know if Thursday, July 28th between 1:00-1:30 pm, Thursday, July 28th between
Best regards,
Tia
Tia Borders
U.S. Department of Education
Director of Scheduling
202.205.4595
Hope your are hanging in. Keep the faith . You are doing amazing work in the middle of some legendary
levels of political craziness.
Wanted to mention two things:
1. We are making our SIG awards public this week. We advised applicants we would strongly favor
"turnaround" submissions- and it worked!. All are "turnaround" or "transformation," and most are the
former. We are also pioneering something that may bubble up to you: We are imposing District-wide
conditions on SIG awards, such as a plan to implement formative assessments or a new teacher eval
system. In other words, if a district wants to get SIG $$ for one of its schools, it needs to agree to spend
some of its OTHER resources on RttT type programs or systems across the board ..
2. I have been charged by Chiefs for Change to set up a meeting with Eric Smith, Deb Gist and you to share
views on how to handle requests from RttT winners to delay implementation. Strong sentiment in the group
that this is problematic. In any event, wanted your ok to try to schedule a call or meeting in mid August.
Many thanks,
Chris
Page 4 of6
2 attachments
Deborah Gist.vcf
2K
2K
Eric Smith.vcf
5:15pm/EST today works for Eric and Deb. Please let me know if that works for you.
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/O/h/f9rriucnxkxk/?&v=pt&s=q&q=from:levesque+to:cerf&s... 3/6/2012
Page 5 of6
Unfortunately, 3:30pm no longer works for Arne. Will 5:05 pm today work for you? If yes, I'll check to see if
it works for Eric and Deb.
888.576.9088
Participant code: 6422925
5:15pm/EST today works for Eric and Deb. Please let me know if that works for you.
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/h/f9rriucnxkxk/?&v=pt&s=q&q=from:levesque+to:cerf&s... 3/6/2012
Page 6 of6
Unfortunately, 3:30pm no longer works for Arne. Will 5:05pm today work for you? If yes, I'll check to see if
it works for Eric and Deb.
Magnificent.
Well done!
Thanks!
https://mail.google.comlmail/u/O/h/f9rriucnxkxk/?&v=pt&s=q&q=from:levesque+to:cerf&s... 3/6/2012
Gmail- FW: Chiefs for Change approval of Children's Defense Fund letter
Page 1 of5
We have received a request for Chiefs for Change to support a letter from the Children's Defense Fund to
Congress re: ESEA. The letter is very short and crisp and falls completely in line with the Chiefs' guiding
principles for ESEA reauthorization .
The Children's Defense Fund is urging congress to make sure all students and all schools are part of the
accountability system.
They would like to send this letter prior to your next bi-weekly call, so we are asking for your inpuUapproval
via email.
Gmail- FW: Chiefs for Change approval of Children's Defense Fund letter
Page 2 of5
We would recommend that you do sign on to this letter, since the mix of the other supporters (ACLU, Center
for American Progress, NAACP, etc.) provides a very good , different mix of the entities you have aligned with
in the past and we recommend that Chiefs for Change sign on as a group (vs. individual members).
Patricia
Jaryn:
Thanks for your quick response. I've attached the letter. We are on a bit of a tight turn-around, hoping to get
sign-ons by the end of the day next Thursday (7/21 ). The development of this letter grew out of a meeting
hosted by Marian Wright Edelman with a number of education advocates to discuss concerns about the
accountability issue in ESEA reauthorization. Given that a number of leaders in the education reform, civil
rights, and business communities have already commented on accountability, our goal is to bring together a
diverse group of organizations to sign on.
You'll see that the letter is short and to the point, delivering the message that a revised accountability
framework in ESEA reauthorization must include all schools and all students, and that proposals limiting
accountability to the lowest-performing schools are unacceptable. As I mentioned already, we think the letter
is very much consistent with the principles for ESEA reauthorization that Chiefs for Change released in May.
Sign-ens so far include the Children's Defense Fund, ACLU, Center for American Progress, the Education
Trust, the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, and the NAACP Legal Defense Fund. Again,
we are hoping to get sign-ons by next Thursday, July 21 5 t-and would be happy to work with you to get any
other information needed to the chiefs. We'd really love to have the group sign-on.
Don't hesitate to get in touch with me with any questions or thoughts. You can reach me by phone at 202662-3544.
https://mail.google.com/maiVu/O/h/f9rriucnxkxk/?&v=pt&s=q&q=from:levesque+to:cerf&s... 3/6/2012
Gmail- FW: Chiefs for Change approval of Children's Defense Fund letter
Page 3 of5
Best,
Will
Hello Will,
Thank you for your email. I am happy to present your letter and request to our Chiefs for Change. Would you
send me a copy of the letter, who else will be signing on, your time line and any other information you would like
me to share with the chiefs?
Best,
Jaryn
] CU')'V\1 Ernhof
Communications Director
Foundation for Florida's Future
Foundation for Excellence in Education
850-391-3072 Office
850-528-8629 Cell
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/O/h/f9rriucnxkxk/?&v=pt&s=q&q=from:levesque+to:cerf&s... 3/6/2012
Gmail- FW: Chiefs for Change approval of Children's Defense Fund letter
Page 4 of5
Dear Jaryn:
I'm writing to ask for your guidance in speaking with someone from Chiefs for Change about a sign-on letter
that the Children's Defense Fund is circulating regarding accountability in ESEA reauthorization. This letter
was developed by CDF and a number of educators and advocates with the intent to bring together several
groups that have already commented on the accountability issue in the on-going ESEA negotiations.
We think that the message of the letter is very much consistent with the principles for ESEA reauthorization
that the Chiefs for Change released in May, and we would love to have the group sign-on.
If you are the best person to work through on this, please let me know. If not, is there someone else I can
speak with about our letter?
Best,
Will
Will Kinder
Policy Assistant
www.childrensdefense.org
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/h/f9rriucnxkxk/?&v=pt&s=q&q=from:levesque+to:cerf&s... 3/6/2012
Gmail- FW: Chiefs for Change approval of Children's Defense Fund letter
Page 5 of5
DATE
The Honorable Arne Duncan
Secretary
United States Department ofEducation
400 Maryland A venue SW
Washington, DC 20202-1510
The Honorable Tom Harkin
Chairman
Senate Committee on Health, Education,
Labor & Pensions
731 Hart Senate Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20510
Dear Sirs:
As Congress works to reauthorize the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA), we
write to express our concern about potential changes to the law that threaten to weaken its
accountability provisions. A reauthorized ESEA must ensure that all schools are held
accountable for the achievement and progress of all students.
Like you, we believe that ESEA is in serious need of revision to incorporate the lessons learned
from No Child Left Behind, including the need for drastically improved supports and
interventions for states, districts, and schools that fall short of performance targets. However,
these revisions must not come at the expense of holding districts and schools accountable for
improving the academic achievement of all students.
More than 60 percent ofpublic school students in the fourth, eighth, and twelfth grades can
neither read nor do math at grade level. Low-income students, minority students, students with
disabilities, and English-language learners lag even further behind. These struggling students
attend all types of schools, not just the very worst.
Despite this reality, many policymakers seem prepared to craft a law that eliminates federal
accountability for the vast majority of schools in our country. We urge policymakers to ensure
states set high standards for all students, establish aggressive but achievable goals for ensuring
that all students in all schools meet those standards, take prompt meaningful action when those
goals are not met by students overall or any one or more student groups, and continue to collect
and report data on student outcomes for all students and all schools. To do anything less - such
as focusing simply on the bottom five or ten percent of schools, as some have proposed -would
be to turn back the clock on a vital civil rights protection for our most vulnerable children. This
is unacceptable.
We urge you to ensure that all schools are held accountable for the achievement and progress of
all students. Don't let "95-percent-left-behind" be the answer to No Child Left Behind.
Since~ely,
CC:
To be clear, these new standards are high, rigorous, and state-led. They do not represent a movement
to create a national curriculum controlled by the federal government, and they are not being driven by
special interests.
It's time we all acknowledge this work is the critical next step in the state-led standards movement that
began more than two decades ago. Today's students must be competitive, both nationally and
internationally. Too many are not, and our society is suffering as a result.
We, as state education leaders, will not allow this to continue. Our economy demands innovative
thinking, a collaborative spirit, and higher expectations for our young people. These new standards,
once met, hit the right marks. This is why we are firmly committed to their successful implementation.
These standards are a promise, not a silver bullet. This work is hard, but states have shown they can
come together to create consistent, high standards all students can master for career and college
success- regardless of who they are or where they live.
Gmail - feedback from Secty Duncan's office on statement from chiefs on AASA and NS...
Page 1 of 3
Chiefs,
We reached out to Carmel Martin, Secty Duncan's point person on ESEA reauthorization regarding the AASA
and NSBA resolution for blanket waiver. We asked if a statement from Chiefs for Change pushing back on
the blanket waiver resolution would be helpful to Secty Duncan.
They do believe a statement would be helpful. The AASAINSBA statement is generating a lot of
attention.
Chiefs for Change's statement would be the only "major'' counter statement to the calls for just flexibility
without any additional reform requirements which would be helpful.
They were ok with both the tone and substance of the draft statement and had no suggested edits.
Attached is a revised statement from the chiefs with edits based upon your comments on the last call. We will
send to your comm. directors also.
Gmail - feedback from Secty Duncan's office on statement from chiefs on AASA and NS...
Page 2 of 3
We will plan to send out first thing next week, please let us know if you would like any edits or if you are ok
with having your name attached to this statement.
Thanks,
Patricia
'E..l
This is excellent! Thanks for the follow up work. We need to move quickly or the best timing will be missed. I
am glad that Arne sees the value in our position.
From: Patricia Levesque (patricia@excelined.org) <patricia@excelined.org>
To: Barresi, Janet <janet.barresi@sde.ok.gov>; Bennett, Tony <drtonybennett@gmail.com>; Bowen,
Stephen <stephenbowen@myfairpoint.net>; Cerf, Chris <cdcerf@gmail.com>; Gist, Deborah
<Deborah.Gist@ride.ri.gov>; Huffman, Kevin <kevin.s.huffman@tn.gov>; Pastorek, Paul
<pastorekpg@gmail.com>; Robinson, Gerard <gtr924@aol.com>; Skandera, Hanna
<hannaskandera@yahoo.com>; Smith, Eric <dreric;jsmith@gmail.com>; Bennett, Tony <tb@doe.in.gov>;
Bowen, Stehen <stephen.bowen@maine.gov>; Cerf, Chris <chris.cerf@doe.state.nj.us>; Pastorek, Paul
<paul.pastorek@la.gov>; Robinson, Gerard <gerard.robinson@governor.virginia.gov>; Skandera, Hanna
<hanna.skandera@state.nm.us>; Smith, Eric
Cc: Fonda Anderson (fonda@excelined.org) <fonda@excelined.org>; Deirdre Finn (dfinn@excelined.org)
<dfinn@excelined.org>; John Bailey <John.Bailey@dutkoworldwide.com>; Jaryn Emhof
(iaryn@excelined.org) <jaryn@excelined.org>; ladnerSS@gmail.com <ladner55@gmail.com>; Mandy Clark
(mandy@excelined.org) <mandy@excelined.org>; Christy Hovanetz (christyh@excelined.org) <chovanetz2@
meridianstrategiesllc.com>; Barresi asst Ginger Difalco <ginger.difalco@sde.ok.gov>; Bennett asst Debbie
https://mail.google.cornlmail/u/O/h/f9rriucnxkxk/?&v=pt&s=q&q=from:levesque+to:cerf&s... 3/6/2012
Gmail - feedback from Secty Duncan's office on statement from chiefs on AASA and NS...
Page 3 of 3
AM
waiver
[Quoted text hidden]
DRAFT
Chiefs for Change Statement on AASA/NSBA Call for Blanket Waivers
As an organization dedicated to putting students first through visionary education reform, Chiefs for
Change opposes the recent petition by the American Association of School Administrators and the
National School Board Association to suspend the accountability provisions of the Elementary and
Secondary Education Act (ESEA) and the interventions provided to students.
We support the swift reauthorization of ESEA. Chiefs for Change has outlined principles to guide
Congress as it works to improve federal policy. Providing a blanket waiver to all states will bring
negotiations on reauthorization to a standstill, creating uncertainty for states and potentially
threatening the progress that has been made by many states to improve the quality of education for
students across America.
We support more federal flexibility, including the use of targeted waivers, but only when such flexibility
supports education reform and when it is earned based upon state actions that have produced greater
student achievement. Blanket regulatory relief would weaken accountability and more importantly,
deny students critical educational services and options.
Reauthorization provides an opportunity to improve ESEA, renew our commitment to America's children
and transform education for the 21st century without rolling back our expectations for students and the
adults who educate them. State and education leaders should seize the moment to be innovative in
improving the quality of education in America.
DRAFT
Page 1 of2
PM
To: "Barresi, Janet" <jcb@sde.ok.gov>, "Barresi, Janet Asst Becky Woodie" <becky.woodie@sde.ok.gov>,
"Barresi, Janet Comm Dir Damon Gardenhire" <damon.gardenhire@sde.ok.gov>, "Bennett, Tony"
<tb@doe.in.gov>, "Bennett, Tony Asst Debbie Downing" <ddowning@doe.in.gov>, "Bennett, Tony Asst Jennifer
Outlaw" <joutlaw@doe.in.gov>, "Bennett, Tony COS Heather Neal" <hneal@doe.in.gov>, "Bowen, Stephen"
<stephen.bowen@maine.gov>, "Bowen, Stephen" <stephenbowen@myfairpoint. net>, "Bowen, Stephen
Scheduler Sandra Moreau" <sandra.moreau@maine.gov>, "Cerf, Chris" <cdcerf@gmail.com>, "Cerf, Chris Asst
Helene Leona" <helene.leona@doe.state.nj.us>, "Cerf, Chris Dep Comm Sp Asst Mamie Doyle"
<mamie.doyle@doe.state.nj.us>, "Cerf, Chris Special Asst Andrew Smarick" <andrew.smarick@doe.state.nj.us>,
"Gist, Deborah" <deborah.gist@ride.ri.gov>, "Huffman, Kevin" <Kevin.S.Huffman@tn.gov>, "Huffman, Kevin COS
Emily Barton" <emily.barton@tn .gov>, "Pastorek, Paul" <pastorekpg@gmail.com>, "Pastorek, Paul Asst Christina
Rose" <christina.rose@eads-na.com>, "Robinson, Gerard" <Gerard. Robinson@fldoe.org>, "Robinson, Gerard
Scheduler Nyla Benjamin" <nyla.benjamin@fldoe.org>, "Skandera, Hanna" <hanna.skandera@state.nm.us>,
"Skandera, Hanna COS Christine Stavem" <christine.stavem@state.nm.us>, "Skandera, Hanna Policy Leighann
Lenti" <leighann.lenti@state.nm.us>, "Skandera, Hanna Scheduler Bernadette Tennyson"
<bernadette.tennyson@state.nm.us>, "Smith, Eric" <drericjsmith@gmail.com>, "Tucker, Jessica"
<jessica. tucker@la.gov>
Cc: "Patricia Levesque (patricia@excelined.org)" <patricia@excelined.org>, "Cari Miller (Cari@excelined.org)"
<Cari@excelined.org>, "Christy Hovanetz (christyh@excelined.org)" <chovanetz2@meridianstrategiesllc.com>,
"Deirdre Finn (dfinn@excelined.org)" <dfinn@excelined.org>, "Erin Price (Erin@excelined.org)"
<Erin@excelined.org>, "Fonda Anderson (fonda@excelined.org)" <fonda@excelined.org>, "Jaryn Emhof
Oaryn@excelined.org)" <jaryn@excelined.org>, "Joanna Hassell (Joanna@afloridapromise.org)"
<Joanna@afloridapromise.org>, "Mandy Clark (mandy@excelined.org)" <mandy@excelined.org>, "Mary Laura
Bragg (MaryLaura@excelined.org)" <MaryLaura@excelined.org>, "Matt Ladner (ladner55@gmail.com)"
<ladner55@gmail.com>, "Matthew Ladner (Matthew@Excelined.org)" <Matthew@excelined.org>, "Paula Noor
(Pnoor@excelined. org)" <Pnoor@excelined. org>
Attached please find the agenda and supporting documents for Friday's call at 9:30 Eastern .
Thanks!
Mary Laura
3/6/20 12
Page 2 of2
4 attachments
FtiiPI 12-9-11 C4C Call Agenda.doc
"e..l 2864K
liliPI
PISA projects.docx
"e..l 14K
fiiiil'l
"e..l 19K
liliPI
Townsend McNitt.docx
"e..J 72K
https://mail.google.cornlmail/u/O/h/f9rriucnxkxk/?&v=pt&s=q&q=from:bragg+to :cerf&th=. ..
3/6/2012
Foundation for
Excellence
in Education
Chiefs for Change Conference Call
Friday, December 9, 2011
9:30am-10:30am EST
Agenda
Call-In Info: Number: 850-391-0329/Passcode: 84940
I.
II.
www.ExcelinEd.org
P.O. Box 10691 Tallahassee, FL 32302 (850) 391-4090 (786) 664-179.4 fax
e Foundation for Excellence in Education (FEE) is t1 SOt (cl3 organization. A copy of the official registration and hnallCI!Ji niormation for FEE may be obtained from the DiviSJon of Consumer Services by calling toll iree
800-43~i352 Within the state of Florida. FEE may usee percentage of your contriaution to support required administtetive
Getting Started:
1. Identify the key positions for which candidates are being sought.
2. Determine the core education reform principles that all candidates must share (ie. annual
testing, rigorous and transparent accountability, high standards for all children, viable
school options).
Use existing networks- To start this list, gather and categorize relevant names and
recommendations from within this group (Chiefs, Education Excellence). This can be
done via telephone conversation and email and names will be cataloged for key positions.
Create an education reform group on a social media site --To encourage people to selfidentify as reformers and give them a place to (virtually) meet other reformers, create an
open group on a social media site, such as Linkedln. Such a group would be open to all
and could serve as the basis for a large, virtual gathering of self-identified reformers.
Gmail - Email Account Re: Agenda for Friday's Chiefs for Change call
Page 1 of 1
"'Coogle
To: MaryLaura@excelined.org
For all DOE official business, please use the following email:
chris.cerf@doe.state.nLus. Please only send non-DOE related emails
to this account. Thank you.
Mary Laura Bragg (Marylaura@excellned.org) <Marylaura@excelined.org> Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 4:56 PM
Reply-To: "Mary Laura Bragg (MaryLaura@excelined.org)" <MaryLaura@excelined.org>
To: Chris Cerf <cdcerf@gmail.com>
I'm sorry - I'll change it in the distribution list.
(Quoted text hidden)
cdcerf@gmail.com <cdcerf@gmall.com>
Reply-To: cdcerf@gmail.com
To: "Mary Laura Bragg (MaryLaura@excelined.org)" <MaryLaura@excelined.org>
Actually, plz keep using this account. I check it much more frequently. Sorry for the confusion
(Quoted text hidden)
3/6/20 12
Page 2 of6
786-664-1794 fax
www.excelined.orgis
'Ell 2864K
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/O/h/f9rriucnxkxk/?&v=pt&s=q&q=from:bragg+to:cerf&th= ...
3/6/2012
Page 3 of6
The revised No Child Left Behind Act that passed out of the Senate education committee last
week goes too far in relaxing state accountability and federal oversight of student achievement.
The business community, civil rights groups and advocates of disabled children are rightly
worried that the rewrite of the law would particularly hurt underprivileged children.
Related in Opinion
More on Education
The bill's main sponsors - Senator Tom Harkin, a Democrat of Iowa, and Senator Mike Enzi, a
Republican of Wyoming- should take the criticism to heart and go back to the drawing board.
The original No Child Left Behind Act of 2002 is far from perfect. The Obama administration
https://mail.google .com/maiVu/O/h/f9rriucnxkxk/?&v=pt&s=q&q=from:bragg+to:cerf&th=...
3/6/20 12
Page 4 of6
recognized that in September when it said that it would waive some of the law's requirements
for states that agree to several reforms, like creating new programs to overhaul the worst
schools and comprehensive teacher evaluation systems.
The waiver plan would allow states to be rated on student growth on math and reading tests
instead of simply counting up the percentages of students who reach proficiency on those tests.
It would also require states to set goals for all schools and plan for closing achievement gaps
and end the pass-fail system under which high-performing schools are rated as needing
improvement if one racial or economic subgroup fails to reach the achievement target.
The plan encourages state~ to embrace data-driven systems and teacher-evaluation systems
that take student achievement into account. But it has not been well received in the Senate,
where some lawmakers seem to feel as if it usurps legislative power.
The Harkin- Enzi bill lowers the bar for reform and reduces federal pressure on the states. It
focuses only on the bottom 5 percent of schools, essentially allowing states to do as they please
with the rest. It backs away from requiring states to have clear student achievement targets for
all schools, and does not require most schools to evaluate teachers rigorously.
Lawmakers are right that No Child Left Behind needs to be overhauled. But Congress needs to
do this carefully, without retreating from core provisions that require states to do better by
children in return for federal aid.
httos://mail.google.com/mail/u/O/h/f9rriucnxkxk/?&v=pt&s=q&q=from: bragg+to:cerf&th=...
3/6/2012
Page 5 of6
Agreed
From: Paul Pastorek [mailto:beaureese24@gmail.com]
3/6/20 12
Page 6 of6
3/6/2012
Foundation for
Excellence
in Education
Chiefs for Change Conference Call
Friday, October 28,2011
9:30am-10:30am EST
Agenda
Call-In Info: Number: 850-391-0329/Passcode: 84940
I.
II.
www.ExcelinEd.org
P.O. Box 106_91 Tallahassee, FL 32302 (850) 391-4090 (786) 664-1794 fax
re Foundation for E~ceflence in Education (FEE) is~ 501(cl3 Of98' JZyiian. A copy of the official registration and financial information for FEE may be obtained from the Diision of Consumer SeNices by calling toll iree
800-435-7352 "''thin the state of Flotida. FEE may use~ percentage of your contribution to support reauired admjnistrative costs, direct costs, ancllor ltdiJties in suppott of education Registration does not imply
Foundation for
Excellence
in Education
Chiefs for Change Conference Call
Friday, October 28,2011
9:30am-10:30am EST
Agenda
Call-In Info: Number: 850-391-0329/Passcode: 84940
I.
II.
www.ExcelinEd.org
P.O. Box 1069.1 Tallahassee, FL 32302 (850) 391-4090 (786) 664-1794 fax
te Foundation for Excellence in Educ81ion (FEE} is 11 50l(c/3 organizaiian. A copy of the offioai regJstra10n and financ~81 mform8tion for FEE may be obtained from the OJ vision of Consumer Services by caHing toH free
800-43~7352 within the state of Florida. FEE may use 8 perc:entBge of your contribution to support required admimStrative costs. direct COSts, and/or activities in support of education. Registration does not imply
Page 1 of4
Sun, Aug
21
9~~~ ~=
To: "Barresi, Janet'' <jcb@sde.ok.gov>, "Barresi, Janet Asst Becky Woodie" <becky.woodie@sde.ok.gov>,
"Barresi, Janet Comm Dir Damon Gardenhire" <damon.gardenhire@sde.ok.gov>, "Barresi, Janet COS Jennifer
Carter'' <jennifer.carter@sde.ok.gov>, "Bennett, Tony" <tb@doe.in.gov>, "Bennett, Tony Asst Debbie Downing"
<ddowning@doe.in.gov>, "Bennett, Tony Asst Jennifer Outlaw" <joutlaw@doe.in.gov>, "Bennett, Tony COS
Heather Neal" <hneal@doe.in.gov>, "Bowen, Stephen" <stephen.bowen@maine.gov>, "Bowen, Stephen"
<stephenbowen@myfairpoint.net>, "Cerf, Chris" <cdcerf@gmail.com>, "Cerf, Chris Asst Helene Leona"
<helene.leona@doe.state.nj.us>, "Cerf, Chris Dep Comm Sp Asst Mamie Doyle"
<mamie.doyle@doe.state.nj.us>, "Cerf, Chris Special Asst Andrew Smarick" <andrew.smarick@doe.state.nj.us>,
"Gist, Deborah" <deborah.gist@ride.ri.gov>, "Huffman, Kevin" <Kevin.S.Huffman@tn.gov>, "Huffman, Kevin COS
Emily Barton" <emily.barton@tn.gov>, "Pastorek, Paul" <pastorekpg@gmail.com>, "Pastorek, Paul Asst Christina
Rose" <christina.rose@eads-na.com>, "Robinson, Gerard" <gtr924@aol.com>, "Robinson, Gerard scheduler
Joseph Morgan" <joseph.morgan@fldoe.org>, "Robinson, Gerard Scheduler Nyla Benjamin"
<nyla.benjamin@fldoe.org>, "Skandera, Hanna" <hanna.skandera@state.nm.us>, "Skandera, Hanna COS
Cathie Carothers" <cathie.carothers@state.nm.us>, "Skandera, Hanna Policy Leighann Lenti"
<leighann.lenti@state.nm.us>, "Skandera, Hanna Scheduler Bernadette Tennyson"
<bernadette.tennyson@state.nm.us>, "Smith, Eric" <drericjsmith@gmail.com>
Cc: "Erlichson, Sari" <bari.erlichson@doe.state.nj.us>, "Kant, Nick" <nick.kant@doe.state.nj.us>, "Emigholz,
Christopher'' <christopher.emigholz@doe.state.nj.us>, "Gantwerk, Barbara"
<barbara. gantwerk@doe.state. nj. us>, "Patricia Levesque (patricia@excelined.org)" <patricia@excelined .org>,
Chris Meyer <Chris.Meyer@la.gov>, "mbrown@doe.in.gov" <mbrown@doe.in.gov>
Attached please find the working draft documents for Monday's call. The spreadsheet is just an example -the authors wanted to make sure you knew that!
If you are not participating In the call, please ignore this message.
Thanks!
2 attachments
6ii1'l C4C
'2:.1 45K
at a glance lndiana.xlsx
https://mail.google.com/mail!u/O/h/f9rriucnxkxk/?&v=pt&s=q&q=from: bragg+to:cerf&th=...
3/6/20 12
Page 2 of4
Leighann C. Lenti
Director of Policy
New Mexico Public Education Department
505-412-2285 (M)
https://mail.google.cornlmail/u/Oih/f9rriucnxkxk/?&v=pt&s=q&q=from:bragg+to:cerf&th=...
3/6/2012
Page 3 of4
Rose; Robinson, Gerard; Robinson, Gerard scheduler Joseph Morgan; Robinson, Gerard Scheduler Nyla
Benjamin; Skandera, Hanna, PED; Carothers, Cathie, PED; Lenti, Leighann, PED; Tennyson, Bernadette, PED;
Smith, Eric
Cc: Erlichson, Bari; Kant, Nick; Emigholz, Christopher; Gantwerk, Barbara; Patricia Levesque
(patrjcja@excelined.org); Chris Meyer; mbrown@doe.in.gov
Subject: working document for ESEA waiver call
Attached please find the working draft documents for Monday's call. The spreadsheet is just an example -the authors wanted to make sure you knew that!
If you are not participating in the call, please ignore this message.
Thanks!
Lenti, Lelghann, PED <Leighann.Lenti@state.nm.us>
Mon, Aug 22,2011 at4:13 PM
To: "Lenti, Leighann, PED" <Leighann.Lenti@state.nm.us>, "Mary Laura Bragg (MaryLaura@excelined.org)"
<MaryLaura@excelined.org>, "Barresi, Janet" <jcb@sde.ok.gov>, "Barresi, Janet Asst Becky Woodie"
<becky.woodie@sde.ok.gov>, "Barresi, Janet Comm Dir Damon Gardenhire" <damon.gardenhire@sde.ok.gov>,
"Barresi, Janet COS Jennifer Carter" <jennifer.carter@sde.ok.gov>, "Bennett, Tony" <tb@doe.in.gov>, "Bennett,
Tony Asst Debbie Downing" <ddowning@doe.in.gov>, "Bennett, Tony Asst Jennifer Outlaw"
<joutlaw@doe.in.gov>, "Bennett, Tony COS Heather Neal" <hneal@doe.in.gov>, "Bowen, Stephen"
<stephen.bowen@maine.gov>, "Bowen, Stephen" <stephenbowen@myfairpoint.net>, "Cerf, Chris"
<cdcerf@gmail.com>, "Cerf, Chris Asst Helene Leona" <helene.leona@doe.state.nj.us>, "Cerf, Chris Dep Comm
Sp Asst Mamie Doyle" <mamie.doyle@doe.state.nj.us>, "Cerf, Chris Special Asst Andrew Smarick"
<andrew.smarick@doe.state.nj.us>, "Gist, Deborah" <deborah.gist@ride.ri.gov>, "Huffman, Kevin"
<Kevin.S.Huffman@tn.gov>, "Huffman, Kevin COS Emily Barton" <emily.barton@tn.gov>, "Pastorek, Paul"
<pastorekpg@gmail.com>, "Pastorek, Paul Asst Christina Rose" <christina.rose@eads-na.com>, "Robinson,
Gerard" <gtr924@aol.com>, "Robinson, Gerard scheduler Joseph Morgan" <joseph.morgan@fldoe.org>,
"Robinson, Gerard Scheduler Nyla Benjamin" <nyla.benjamin@fldoe.org>, "Skandera, Hanna, PED"
<Hanna.Skandera@state.nm.us>, "Carothers, Cathie, PED" <Cathie.Carothers@state.nm.us>, "Tennyson,
Bernadette, PED" <bernadette.tennyson@state.nm.us>, "Smith, Eric" <drericjsmith@gmail.com>
Cc: "Erlichson, Bari" <bari.erlichson@doe.state.nj.us>, "Kant, Nick" <nick.kant@doe.state.nj.us>, "Emigholz,
Christopher" <christopher.emigholz@doe. state. nj.us>, "Gantwerk, Barbara"
<barbara.gantwerk@doe.state. nj.us>, "Patricia Levesque (patricia@excelined.org)" <patricia@excelined.org>,
Chris Meyer <Chris.Meyer@la.gov>, "mbrown@doe.in.gov" <mbrown@doe.in.gov>, David DeSchryver
<david. deschryver@dutkograyling .com>
https://mail.google.cornlmail/u/O/h/f9rriucnxkxk/?&v=pt&s=q&q=from:bragg+to:cerf&th= ...
3/6/2012
Page 4 of4
Joseph Morgan; Robinson, Gerard Scheduler Nyla Benjamin; Skandera, Hanna, PED; Carothers, Cathie, PED;
Tennyson, Bernadette, PED; Smith, Eric
Cc: Erlichson, Bari; Kant, Nick; Emigholz, Christopher; Gantwerk, Barbara; Patricia Levesque
(patricia@excelined.org); Chris Meyer; mbrown@doe.in.gov; 'David DeSchryver'
Subject: RE: working document for ESEA waiver call
(Quoted text hidden)
mit"~
"e.J 54K
httns://mail.g:ool!le.com/mail/u/O/h/f9rriucnxkxk/?&v=pt&s=q&q=from:bragg+to :cerf&th=...
3/6/2012
Draft version 1
Chiefs~
The following table identifies the key priorities for each C4C state. The purpose of the chart Is to represent the importance of each Issue for the state. This is lnrended for Internal
discussion only. The Issues derive from the "Chiefs for Change Flexibility for Reform Framework."
August2011
\.AliA
YVJI'Il
I AdVIsors
Wh~eboard
Memorandum
Re:
C4C Monday August 22 Call. Developing the Flexibility for Reform Framework
From:
Date:
to host a call on Monday, August 22 to further develop the "flexibility for reform framework."
The framework is based on the letter that the Chiefs sent Sec. Duncan on July 28. In it,
the Chiefs outline key reform priorities and discuss needed flexibility from current federal
requirements. The document is the basis of ongoing discussions with the Secretary of Education
regarding the ESEA waivers.
The Chiefs for Change have a remarkable opportunity to emerge as a national leader for
education reform. To capitalize on the opportunity, the Chiefs need to present a clear vision for
the group while also supporting the unique challenges that each chief faces. To do that, we
need to better understand what is and what is not a priority/feasible for each chief.
This document begins to collect that information. It organizes the reform framework
(from the July 28 letter) into six categories. Within each category there are more specific issues.
For each of these issues, we are collecting responses - brief responses- to five questions. The
questions are designed to help us think through these issues priorities relative to the reform
framework and the waiver request. It should provide more clarity on where we agree, where we
don't, and how we can work together.
Accountability:
};;>
Is this a priority? 1=1ow priority; 3= high priority; 2=important, but not a top
priority.
How do you articulate a "high bar'' for this objective? College and career-ready
assessment??
What is unique to your state that other the other C4C chiefs should know?
Nothing.
What is the desired federal flexibility from NCLB to facilitate that policy? We can
substitute PARCC assessments (someday) for our own assessments. Not sure if
there is anything immediate we would ask for.
};;>
\.AliA
vv/"'
I Whiteboard
Adviso.rs
o
Is this a priority? l=low priority; 3= high priority; 2=important, but not a top
priority.
What is the state's key policy objective? This is maybe the highest priority of all
for IN. We want the waiver process to help us raise the bar on our state
accountability system, so that we can reach more schools (and maybe districts
as well for the first time). We'd like ED to tell us we need to reach approximately
the bottom 5% of schools with our state system in order to substitute it for AYP.
How do you articulate a "high bar'' for this objective? Bottom 5% of schools in
return for not having to follow AYP
What is unique to your state that other the other C4C chiefs should know? State
accountability system and making it more aggressive was one of the main bills
that caused our House Dems to walkout for 5 weeks last session. We had to pull
back the bill last year. If ED can hold us to a higher bar, we may finally be able
to make our accountability system stronger as we want to. We can "blame" it
on the feds.
What is the desired federal flexibility from NCLB to facilitate that policy?
(AYP flexibility is suggested). In return for allowing state to sub their own state
accountability systems for AYP, state must address approximately the bottom
5% of schools.
);>
Is this a priority? l=low priority; 3= high priority; 2=important, but not a top
priority.
What is the state's key policy objective? Ability to utilize our own accountability
system, which already gives our state board of education broad authority tQ
implement differentiated interventions depending on the needs of the school.
How do you articulate a "high bar'' for this objective? Refer to above element.
States should have broad authority to implement differentiated consequences
for schools as part of their own accountability systems in return for no longer
usingAYP.
What is unique to your state that other the other C4C chiefs should know?
What is the desired federal flexibility from NCLB to facilitate that policy?
(Close coordination with the Schoo/ Improvement Grant (5/G) will be critical).
Ability to utilize our own accountability system, which already gives our state
board of education broad authority to implement differentiated interventions
depending on t he needs of the school. We would be happy t o coordin ate SIG
more closely with our state accountability system in any way the feds request,
as long as it doesn't involve extra/excessive paperwork/bu reaucracy
);>
Is this a priority? l=low priority; 3= high priority; 2=important, but not a top
priority.
Whiteboard
Advisors
o
What is the state's key policy objective?lf feds are willing to require some kind
of parent trigger provision as part of a state's accountability system, we'd be
pleased about that.
How do you articulate a "high bar'' for this objective? Not sure I'd want them to
require anything more than simply that parents and/or community members'
voices be heard as part of a state's accountability system in order for it to be
substituted for AYP. It would get bureaucratic to require too many specifics in
this area.
What is unique to your state that other the other C4C chiefs should know? We
already require community representatives to be part of the teams that
evaluate schools that fall into the early years of our state's accountability
system, so we are
What is the desired federal flexibility from NCLB to facilitate that policy? Require
parent trigger and/or require parent/community involvement in some way as
part of intervention process through the state accountability system
Funding
);>
Is this a priority? l=low priority; 3= high priority; 2=important, but not a top
What is the state's key policy objective?Want to better understand other states'
priority.
objectives in this area in order to help us formulate our own.
o
What is unique to your state that other the other C4C chiefs should know?
What is the desired federal flexibility from NCLB to facilitate that policy?
(NCLB, Title I ranking and serving requirements limit how districts distribute the
funds).
);>
Is this a priority? l=low priority; 3= high priority; 2=important, but not a top
priority.
What is the state's key policy objective? Would also like to better understand
other state's policy objectives in this area in order to help us formulate our own.
);>
What is unique to your state that other the other C4C chiefs should know?
What is the desired federal flexibility from NCLB to facilitate that policy?
Is this a priority? l=low priority; 3= high priority; 2=important, but not a top
priority.
W/AI
Whiteboarcl
Advisors
o
What is the state's key policy objective? Tony strongly wants to implement
some kind of "fiscal letter grade" for each district in our state. We aren't yet
sure how this might be calculated.
How do you articulate a "high bar'' for this objective? Would love to hear other
states' ideas about this- we want to include use of state and possibly even local
funds in our calculations, so how we might want fed waiver requirement to help
us achieve this isn't clear to me yet.
What is unique to your state that other the other C4C chiefs should know?
What is the desired federal flexibility from NCLB to facilitate that policy?
Human Capital
~
Teacher and principal evaluations based, in significant part, on student academic growth
o
Is this a priority? l=low priority; 3= high priority; 2=important, but not a top
priority.
What is the state's key policy objective? End HQT requirements completely and
substitute it with "HET"
How do you articulate a "high bar'' for this objective? State must propose
system of requiring teacher evaluations based in significant part on
student/school growth data. An even higher bar could require this to be tied to
te acher licensure as well.
What is unique to your state that other the other C4C chiefs should know? We
are already able to do this, so we have no problem with it.
What is the desired federal flexibility from NCLB to facilitate that policy?
Is this a priority? l=low priority; 3= high priority; 2=important, but not a top
What is the state's key policy objective? I think we have already achieved our
priority.
policy objectives along these lines.
o
How do you articulate a "high bar'' for t his objective? I think any requirement
along these lines is already a high bar.
What is unique to your state that other the other C4C chiefs should know?
What is the desired fede ral flexibility from NCLB to facilitate that policy? This
could be part of the state requirement in return for no longer having to track
HQT in any way.
Wh~eboard
vv/"" I AdVIsors
\AliA
}l>
strategic PD support
o
Is this a priority? l=low priority; 3= high priority; 2=important, but not a top
priority. Not sure
What is the state's key policy objective? Would love to hear other states' ideas
here in order to help spur my thinking.
What is unique to your state that other the other C4C chiefs should know?
What is the desired federal flexibility from NCLB to facilitate that policy?
Options
}l>
Charter schools
o
Is this a priority? l=low priority; 3= high priority; 2=important, but not a top
priority.
}l>
What is unique to your state that other the other C4C chiefs should know?
What is the desired federal flexibility from NCLB to facilitate that policy?
virtual schools
o
Is this a priority? l=low priority; 3= high priority; 2=important, but not a top
priority.
What is the state's key policy objective? Keep our market for virtual charters
and other virtual schools alive and growing.
What is unique to your state that other the other C4C chiefs should know?
Genera l assembly is mis-trustful of virtual schools and virtual charters in
particular.
What is the desired federal flexibility from NCLB to facilitate that policy? Not
sure? Maybe somehow requiring states to allow virtual charters and other
virtual schools, but I'm not sure in return for what flexibility ...
}l>
Tax credits
o
Is this a priority? l=low priority; 3= high priority; 2=important, but not a top
priority.
}l>
What is unique to your state that other the other C4C chiefs should know?
What is the desired federal flexibility from NCLB to facilitate that policy?
Choice
Whiteboard
Advisors
o
Is this a priority? l=low priority; 3= high priority; 2=important, but not a top
priority.
What is the
private choice, tax credit and charter school, in addition to intra-district choice
options available in the state.
o
What is unique to your state that other the other C4C chiefs should know? We
already have vouchers, charters, tax credits, a good deal of inter-district choice.
It would be great to find ways to help publicize it all.
What is the desired federal flexibility from NCLB to facilitate that policy? If LEAs
allow intradistrict choice and will promote the multitude of other choice options
in the state (per IDOE's requirements), LEA will no longer have to do 20% setaside. (This is just one crazy idea- what do others think?)
Tutoring/SES
o Is this a priority? l=low priority; 3= high priority; 2=important, but not a top
priority.
What is the
What is unique to your state that other the other C4C chiefs should know?
What is the desired federal flexibility from NCLB to facilitate that policy?
(20% set aside and very structured state approval process may be problematic).
Reports
~
Is this a priority? l=low priority; 3= high priority; 2=important, but not a top priority.
What is the state's key policy objective? Be allowed to merge all federal reports for
LEAs and SEA.
What is unique to your state that other the other C4C chiefs should know?
What is the desired federal flexibility from NCLB to facilitate that policy? Be allowed
to merge all federal reports for LEAs and SEA.
Is this a priority? l=low priority; 3= high priority; 2=important, but not a top priority.
What is the
\.AliA
YVfl'l\.
I AdVIsors
Wh~eboard
o
What is unique to your state that other the other C4C chiefs should know?
What is the desired federal flexibility from NCLB to facilitate that policy?
II
A
YVfl"\.
\.A
I Advisors
Whiteboard
Memorandum
Re:
C4C Monday August 22 Call. Developing the Flexibility for Reform Framework
From:
Date:
to host a call on Monday, August 22 to further develop the "flexibility for reform framework."
The framework is based on the letter that the Chiefs sent Sec. Duncan on July 28. In it,
the Chiefs outline key reform priorities and discuss needed flexibility from current federal
requirements. The document is the basis of ongoing discussions with the Secretary of Education
regarding the ESEA waivers.
The Chiefs for Change
he~ve
education reform. To capitalize on the opportunity, the Chiefs need to present a clear vision for
the group while also supporting the unique challenges that each chief faces. To do that, we
need to better understand what is and what is not a priority/feasible for each chief.
This document begins to collect that information. It organizes the reform framework
(from the July 28 letter) into six categories. Within each category there are more specific issues.
For each of these issues, we are collecting responses - brief responses- to five questions. The
questions are designed to help us think through these issues priorities relative to the reform
framework and the waiver request. It should provide more clarity on where we agree, where we
don't, and how we can work together.
Accou ntabilitv:
)>
Is this a priority? 1=1ow priority; 3= high priority; 2=important, but not a top
priority.
)>
What is unique to your state that other the other C4C chiefs should know?
What is the desired federal flexibility from NCLB to facilitate that policy?
Is this a priority? 1=1ow priority; 3= high priority; 2=important, but not a top
priority.
What is unique to your state that other the other C4C chiefs should know?
What is the desired federal flexibility from NCLB to facilitate that policy?
(AYP flexibility is a given, but we should also address how to better diagnose,
'A
IIA
wVfl'l\
I Whiteboard
Advisors
classify and intervene in the schools. Building on that thought, let's consider
where we do not wont ony Federal role. Let's not invite Federal intrusion
if it's
not necessary).
What is unique to your state that other the other C4C chiefs should know?
What is the desired federal flexibility from NCLB to facilitate that policy?
(In addition to addressing flexibility from NCLB's 7 year cascade of
consequences - choice, SES, corrective action, alternative governance - we
should propose a more flexible SIG model, beyond just the 4 models identified in
current SIG grant. We should also address the nexus of performance measures
and gain measures. How to reward low performing schools with high gains. It
may be useful to look at the CO growth model on this matter.).
};>
Is this a priority? l=low priority; 3= high priority; 2=important, but not a top
priority.
What is the state's key policy objective?
What is unique to your state that other the other C4C chiefs should know?
What is the desired federal flexibility from NCLB to facilitate that policy?
Funding
};>
Is this a priority? l=low priority; 3= high priority; 2=important, but not a top
priority.
What is unique to your state that other the other C4C chiefs should know?
What is the desired federal flexibility from NCLB to facilitate that policy?
(NCLB, Title I ranking and serving requirements limit how districts distribute the
funds).
};>
Is this a priority? l=low priority; 3= high priority; 2=important, but not a top
priority.
W/AI
);>
Whiteboard
Advisors
o
What is unique to your state that other the other C4C chiefs should know?
What is the desired federal flexibility from NCLB to facilitate that policy?
Is this a priority? l=low priority; 3= high priority; 2=important, but not a top
What is unique to your state that other the other C4C chiefs should know?
What is the desired federal flexibility from NCLB to facilitate that policy?
priority.
Human Capital
);>
Teacher and principal evaluations based, in significant part, on student academic growth
o
Is this a priority? l=low priority; 3= high priority; 2=important, but not a top
priority.
What is unique to your state that other the other C4C chiefs should know?
What is the desired federal flexibility from NCLB to facilitate that policy?
Is this a priority? l=low priority; 3= high priority; 2=important, but not a top
priority.
);>
What is unique to your state that other the other C4C chiefs should know?
What is the desired federal flexibility from NCLB to facilitate that policy?
Is this a priority? l=low priority; 3= high priority; 2=important, but not a top
priority.
What is unique to your state that other the other C4C chiefs should know?
What is the desired federal flexibility from NCLB to facilitate that policy?
W/AI
Whiteboard
Advisors
Options
~
Charter schools
o
Is this a priority? l=low priority; 3= high priority; 2=important, but not a top
priority.
What is unique to your state that other the other C4C chiefs should know?
What is the desired federal flexibility from NCLB to facilitate that policy?
virtual schools
o
Is this a priority? l=low priority; 3= high priority; 2=important, but not a top
What is unique to your state that other the other C4C chiefs should know?
What is the desired federal flexibility from NCLB to facilitate that policy?
priority.
Tax credits
o Is this a priority? l=low priority; 3= high priority; 2=important, but not a top
o
priority.
What is the state's key policy objective?
What is unique to your state that other the other C4C chiefs should know?
What is the desired federal flexibility from NCLB to facilitate that policy?
Choice
o
Is this a priority? l=low priority; 3= high priority; 2=important, but not a top
priority.
What is unique to your state that other the other C4C chiefs should know?
What is the desired federal flexibility from NCLB to facilitate that policy?
Tutoring/SES
o
Is this a priority? l=low priority; 3= high priority; 2=important, but not a top
priority.
What is unique to your state that other the other C4C chiefs should know?
W/AI
Whiteboarcl
Advisors
o
What is the desired federal flexibility from NCLB to facilitate that policy?
(20% set aside and very structured state approval process may be problematic).
Reports
~
Is this a priority? l=low priority; 3= high priority; 2=important, but not a top priority.
What is unique to your state that other the other C4C chiefs should know?
What is the desired federal flexibility from NCLB to facilitate that policy?
Is this a priority? l=low priority; 3= high priority; 2=important, but not a top priority.
What is unique to your state that other the other C4C chiefs should know?
What is the desired federal flexibility from NCLB to facilitate that policy?
Page 1 of2
PM
To: "Barresi, Janef' <janet.barresi@sde.ok.gov>, "Barresi, Janet Asst Becky Woodie"
<becky.woodie@sde.ok.gov>, "Barresi, Janet Comm Dir Damon Gardenhire" <damon.gardenhire@sde.ok.gov>,
"Barresi, Janet COS Jennifer Carter'' <jennifer.carter@sde.ok.gov>, "Bennett, Tony" <tb@doe.in.gov>, "Bennett,
Tony Asst Amy Miller'' <amiller@doe.in.gov>, "Bennett, Tony Asst Debbie Downing" <ddowning@doe.in.gov>,
"Bennett, Tony COS Heather Neal" <hneal@doe.in.gov>, "Bowen, Stephen" <stephen.bowen@maine.gov>,
"Bowen, Stephen" <stephenbowen@myfairpoint.net>, "Cerf, Chris" <cdcerf@gmail.com>, "Cerf, Chris Asst
Helene Leona" <helene.leona@doe.state.nj.us>, "Cerf, Chris Special Asst Andrew Smarick"
<andrew.smarick@doe.state.nj.us>, "Gist, Deborah" <deborah.gist@ride.ri.gov>, "Huffman, Kevin"
<Kevin.S.Huffman@tn.gov>, "Huffman, Kevin COS Emily Barton" <emily.barton@tn.gov>, "Pastorek, Paul"
<pastorekpg@gmail.com>, "Pastorek, Paul Asst Christina Rose" <christina.rose@eads-na.com>, "Robinson,
Gerard" <gtr924@aol.com>, "Skandera, Hanna" <hanna.skandera@state.nm.us>, "Skandera, Hanna COS
Cathie Carothers" <cathie.carothers@state.nm.us>, "Skandera, Hanna Policy Leighann Lenti"
<leighann.lenti@state.nm.us>, "Smith, Eric" <drericjsmith@gmail .com>
Cc: "Christy Hovanetz (christyh@excelined.org)" <chovanetz2@meridianstrategiesllc.com>, "Deirdre Finn
(dfinn@excelined.org)" <dfinn@excelined.org>, "Erin Price (Erin@excelined.org)" <Erin@excelined.org>, "Fonda
Anderson (fonda@excelined.org)" <fonda@excelined.org>, "Jaryn Emhof Uaryn@excelined.org)"
<jaryn@excelined.org>, "Joanna Hassell (Joanna@afloridapromise.org)" <Joanna@afloridapromise.org>, "John
Bailey Uohn.bailey@dutkoworldwide.com)" <john.bailey@dutkoworldwide.com>, "Mandy Clark
(mandy@excelined.org)" <mandy@excelined.org>, "Mary Laura Bragg (MaryLaura@excelined.org)"
<MaryLaura@excelined.org>, "Matt Ladner (ladner55@gmail.com)" <ladner55@gmail.com>, "Matthew Ladner
(Matthew@Excelined.org)" <Matthew@excelined.org>, "Paula Noor (Pnoor@excelined.org)"
<Pnoor@excelined. org>
Chiefs,
As discussed on our conference call this morning, a resolution will be introduced at ALEC (August 4th and
5th) against implementation of the Common Core Standards.
Attached is the list of members we received from ALEC today, if you want to reach out to any or all of them
about this issue and urge them to vote no.
I have also attached the draft resolution ("State Sovereignty in Education Acf') for your information.
Thank you,
Mary Laura
2 attachments
EDUC TFR 2011.07 .22.xls
https://mail.google.com/maiVu/Oih/f9rriucnxkxk/?&v=pt&s=q&q=from: bragg+to:cerf&th= .. .
3/6/2012
Page 2 of2
~ 85K
riiii"' State Sovereignty In Education Act.doc
':e...J 32K
2 attachments
~
~ 85K
https://mail.google.com/maiVu/O/h/f9rriucnxkxk/?&v=pt&s=q&q=from:bragg+to:cerf&th=...
3/6/2012
DN1
. DNZ
p~
Jensen
~ Scott
~ J~ -,;jikkila
DN2
DN1
Mr
Mr
Michael
Rich
DN2
Mr.
_ Emmett
_Q_ ~
_p1
Last
_ first
Poliakoff
Danker
Title
National Consultant for State
---;<
Projects
Government Affa1rs Director
Po!ly Director
Project Director, Economics
~~
State Affa1rs Coordinator
Lynds~ _ i - -Hall
Brian _ e--!l~~
Melissa
___Q1 _ ~-
Garratt
DN1
ADV
Dr.
Mr
Matthew
Bob
Ladner
Withams
DN1 4Mr
l..!lliL Mr
~n
Butcher
Nothdurft
Oeslriech
DN2
N:JV
DN2DN2
-~
DN1
John
Marc
H!!!!}'_ ~Iiiia
4
.J!lf__,_ ~ Hilt
Mr
Ms
Mr.
Ben
Lisa
William
DN2 ~
I~
..QNL
_DL
__!!'!!._
Ms.
Susan
~- ~
DeGraw
Knepper
Mellor -
Patrick
StO(IpS
_!lL ~
l2.11!!_
~n
Policy Analyst
Director of Communications
President
Keller
_Mr. _ _!!_rye!!_
~-- ~
_ QL r--Mr,_ _
Researcher
Director of Education P~
Carreon
Janes
Executive Director
Merman
Weller
Corcoran
Pro11ram Director
_QL
Meribeth
D2
e-M'-
_!!rl!'!_
Mr.
_ KeVIn
_Ql
Mr
David
Hansen_
__!!_1"!1_
Mr
~-!9
Richmond
D2
Ms
Anna
Dav1s
--- Company
Address
~ Street, NW
Address 2
_____!)'__ State
Brookfield
Keam~y
Suite802
Suite700
4- 2
Washington
Ste900
Washington
Washin~
Phone
Fax
53045
WI
~~ 588-70~2- ~)
NE ~84I__ - ~)224-4309
~~~~
DC
Wash I~
Suite 300
ZIP
DC
20036
ooo5
~)
20005
~) 503-2010
798-9919
E-Mail
scotijensen@wi.rr.com
jiJikkilaQfederatlonforchildren.org __
mpoliakoff@goacta.org
rdanker~mericanprinciete!efPject. org_
467-6779202-503-2010
emgjroa~@american~inci~~ect.o~
DC
20036
{202) 336-6709
202) 336-6828
__Qf
20036
(202) 336-6807
202) 336-6828
SUJte600
San Dl!ll!!__ ~A
!12128
lyndseY..hall@career.org
Brian.newman@aescu.o~
SUJte600
San Diego
CA
92128
(858) 668-2586
{85!1)_408-2903
Connections Aced_amy _
Connections Academy
5th Floor
Baltimore
Brooklyn
MD
N'r
21202
11218
(718)284-4435
718)_284-4495
~) 740-0867
1350 I Street NW
Suite 1270
Washil)llli!!L._ _QQ_
20005
1350 I Street
Suite 1270
Washington
DC
20005
(202) 682-9494
_@g) 682-9170
mpele~.edu
Oall, Inc.
4306 T Street
Sacramento
I~
95819
{916) 606-2872
{512) 283-7165
roxanne_gould@dell.com
Dell Inc
Foundation for Excellence in
Education
Foundation for Excellence in
Education
Freedom Foundation
MS8033
Round Rock
TX
78682
_J512) 723-2712
512) 283-2712
Michael YoLI__ng(!!Jdell.com
Suite 100
Tallahassee
FL
32302
850-391-3076
786-664-1794
mandy!!!lexcelined.org
Phoenix
Olympia
AZ
WA
85004
98507
(602) 462-5000
(360) 956-3482
.(602) 256-7045
ladner5~mail. corn
~(360) 352-1874
bwilllamsG effwa.org
Phoenix
Chicago
Chicago
AZ
IL
IL
85004
60603
60603
(602) 462-5000
312 377-4000
(312) 377-4000
11602) 256-7045
{312! 377-5000
312 377-5000
_jbutche_r-C goldwaterinstitute.org
Suile903
Suite 903
DuaWest
SI!!Lngt;eld
sc
2nd Floor
29639
62704
1864) 379-3080
hstllleg_erskine.edu
1803) 734-2827
217 494~ 217) 528-8808 ~llin@illinoi!~cyinslilute.org
Golden
co
Education
Goldwater Institute
Heartland Institute
Heartland Institute
Higher Education
Research/Policy Center
Illinois Policy Institute
Independence Institute
Institute for Justice
Institute for Justice
Institute for Justice Arizona
Ch~
Suite400
Suite900
Suite 900
mrevenaugh@earthlink.net
~iusti~i.edu
jnothdurfl~heartland.org
MOestrelchC hearlland.C!i__
~! 279-6536
H'.~
VA
1703) 682-9320
"i7ooT 682-9320
~1 279-4176
(~ 682-9321
lknei!P~)j.org
li703) 682-9321
wmellor@ij.o[lj
Tempe
AZ
85281
. (480)_557-8300
.(480) 557-8315
tkeller@ij.org
Vienna
RaleiQ!l
VA
NC
22182
27601
(~ 441-5780
(919) 828-3876
(703) 752-6201
1(919) 821 -5117
tst~l!!!!!:!locke. org
Herndon
VA
20171
-~) 483-7135
Iao3> 483-733o
bfloodC k12.com
Littleton
co
80128
~) 904-7189_ ~)
Arli!)glon
Suite 350
Sulle200
~ y strom_@connectlonsacadem~
80401
22203
22203
Arlingt~g__
IL
ben@i21.org
spalrick@inacol.org
200-8281
K12
8th Floor
Chlca@._
IL
60606
8th Floor
Chicago
IL
60606
8th Floor
Chica@._
IL
60606
{ 312 ) 385-~
Blh Floor
60606
(312) 385-3186
866-679-1489
46204
_ G!D 951-5493
.@E) 951-5468
kcorcoran@luminafoundation.org_
davldh!!!lqua.!!Jycharters.o [ l l _
1-
Chicag!!___
Suite 700
---
Indianapolis
'--''=-IN
Chicago
_ _ _!!:_ _ 60603
ArlinQton
VA
22209
(312) 385-3187
_j~
385-1238
_!312) 376-2353
(703) 465-2176
dlee~k12 .com
_ _ _ E!rreon@kaplan.edu
~-
---
(312) 376-2400
_ __
DBnes~kaplan . edu
---i
I
mmerrnall@kaplan.edu
bwellar2@kaplan.edu
---i
gregr@_gualil~charters. org___
Mr.
Thobaudeau
02
Mr_
Dr
Nocholas
Richard
Paradiso
Vedder
DN2
NPS1
Mr.
Brandon
Dutcher
Dav~- t-- Bond
DN2
_ QL
i__!!!i____
Mr
Vicki
Murrav
~ysr_
~
D!:;!L
Mr
Ms.
Bowen
ADV
Ms.
Demsa
DN2
Mr
Dale
Buwalda
DN2
Mr .
Robert
Enlow
SIBI>I\en
~~ ~~:-- Lasher
~1
Ms
Leslie
Honer
___!!L
Mr.
Jeffrey
Reed
__Q!__
_Ms.
Roberta
PhllliJ?S
__Q_
Stanton
Anderson
Finne
DN2
LM
Was
- LM- ~!I_
ReP-,_ ____leva
Sludoes
Pacific Research lnslolule
Vice President, Corporate
Development
ScanIron
Director of the Center for
Stale Polig: Network
Educaloon Excello~~
_ __President and CEO
Stale Poli9' Network
Exacullve Director of Public
Step Up For Students/ Floroda
Relatoons
Educatoon Freedom Foundation
Si!iiePrOgram and Government The Foundation for Educational
Relations Director
Choice
The Foundation for Educational
President & CEO
Choice
Vice President of Programs &
The Foundation for Educational
State Relations
Choice
The Foundation for Educational
State Programs Director
Choice
U.S. Chamber Campaign for Free
Director, Special Projects
Enter~ rise
Chaorrnan, Campaign for Free
Enterpnse & Sanior Counsel To
U.S. Chamber of Commerce,
the President and CEO
Cam~algn for Free Ente~ise
Director, Center for Education
Reform
Washington Poliey Center
Keller
Court
Alaska R.!!J1!esentalive
Anzona Representative
Alaska Legislature
Arizona l~!alslalure
Paradise Valley
1\Z
85253
J 916)448-1926
Challanooga
...TIL
Portland
RochrriOnd
C'A
Suite2420
lndia~lis
..J!i.... -
46282
_1317) 681-0745
(317) 681-0945
SUite 2420
Indianapolis
IN
46282
(317) 681-0745
.@!1) 681-0945
Suite2420
IN
46282
20062
~) 659-6000
1615 H Street, NW
Washington
DC
20062-2000
(202) 463-5481
~ 463-5863
sandersonguschamber.com
P 0 . Box 3643
Saallle
WA
98124
(206) 937-9691
(206) 624-8038
lfinne@washington~oli~G__
Goodale
Arozona
Reeresenta~ve
Anzona Legislature
Anzona
~esenlalove
Eddoe
Williams
Kathleen
Conti
LM
Keolh
King
~ Rep. - ~
S_~tn
Carole
Naney
__.l:_M
Rei).
Gaol
LM
Rep
Timothy
LM _
LM
Ree_
Arkansas Senator
Colorado
R~senlalove
Colorado Senator
-~
.l>ence
_
Colorado Re11resanlalove
Colorado Senator
_!,avo aile
__f___
onnll_clocut Ra11fesenlalive
LeGevt
Conneclocut Representative
leslie!l!!edchoice.org
DC
Rep.
dale@edchoice.olll
rcenlow!l!!edchoice,ol l l _ _
Wa~i!}II!On
1-----Anzona Legislature
~!!!..
dlasher@feff.org
Indianapolis
Arizona Rel1!esantalova
LM
1615 H Street, NW _
Follmore
lM
me~r@ scanlron.com
sbowen@mainepoli~--sha!E@_~g
(70~[740-0314
John
l~ Sen
~ 773-4385
j 317')_681-0945
R_EI~
I-- Camone
l;t~
Jeffress
(703) 740-0310
- 1703) 740-0310
_1317) 681-0745
_bM
~
Jommy
4112
46282
~~
R~
ME
33606
Arizona la!l!slature
-~.!!1__
vmurral1!!le!Cificresearch.ol]l
kan
IN
Arizona Representative
LM
LM
-~! 989-2411
Fl
Crandell
--r.;s- r ~IJI!!!_
Dav~bond@gmail.com
Tampa
Chester
Suite 1
1700Wesl
Washington
Street
1700Wesl
Weshonglon
Street
1700West
Washonglon
Street
1700Wesl
Washonglon
Street
1700West
Washington
-~~ 465-2186
---
~ff!l!!edcholce.org
RPhilloes!!!!USChamber.com
represenlative_wes_keller@legis.state.ak.u
_@Q?) 465-3818
s
~) 417-5018
scoUrt@azleg.gov
Wasilla
Mesa
AK
1\Z
99654
85203
Phoenox
AZ
85007-2890
_!602) 926-3020
Phoemx
1\Z
85007-2890
1928) 535-4107
c.crandell@holmail.com
Phoenix
AZ 85007-2890
(602) 9265681
jfjllmore!l!!azl!Q;~
Phoenix
AZ 85007-2890
AZ 85007-2890
(602) 926-3014
nparadiso@heriJ!geecademies.com
vadder@ohio.edu
--
lndoa~ olis
Rep.
Arkansas Reeresenlalove
Arkansas Rej1!esanlahve
~nsas Rej1!esentative
Arkansas Senator
(616) 675-6801
- j 740) 593-0097
Suite2420
__!,M
Reeve
cthibaudeau@~e_
John
_(40~)_602-1667
Anzona L!IIISiature
Amanda
{616) 222-1700
{I40) 593-2037
_____1405 602-1667
Anzona Senator
Rep_
(800j 228-3224
49512
45701
73104
73104
Crandall
lM
22209
Ml
OH
OK
OK
Rich
-.!:._M
VA
Oklahoma City
Oklahoma City
Sen
_Bile_ ~
Arlington
Grand Rapids
Athens
- LM
t,M
Suote201
AR
~) 926-4467
---
~1_117-3119
AR
AR
72201-108~
(501 ) 682-5951
~ ~ 784
co 80203-1784
(303) 866-4880
I!303) 866-2646
AR
dg oodalegazle(l,gov;dbable!l!!azle~
areeveGazleg,ggv
72201 -1089
(870) 688-6181
72758
__{501) 682-6211
72654
] 501 } 682-2920
71635
j_50i j682-6107
AR
rcrandall@azleg.gov
{ 501 ) 682-3479
{501) 682-3479
---
burrosforslatereegmail.corn
&jca
~cox.net
karen. h~rgarkansashouse.OI]I
jjllffress~. slale.ar. us
1501 ) 68~3479
(50!1682-2917
kathleen.conli.house@slate.co.us
keilh~eothking . org
co
80203-1784
(303) 866-2747
-~~~ -
co
co
80203-1784
8001 L
~)866-2948
1~866-2218
CT
06106-1591
. (860) 240-8700
CT
06106-1591
{860} 693-8718
lom.massey.house@slale.co.us
murra~il. com
niiOCYJ s~ence!l!!gmail.com
--
_ _gail.lavielle@housegop.ct.gov
Tim.LeGeVItll!housaaoP.ct.aov
--
~-
LM
R~p
Mochael
Davod
..B!J:!, ~
Sen
I_!!!_ ~
J:.M
LM
LM
Dudgeon
~ _ Greg
~~~~
Jan
Howard
I~
L:M ~
.B!L ~
Fran
LM
lM
.....!J!1
Re~ -
Rep.
.Bob
!!_ogar
LM
~ _!!!lvod
LM
-~
~
LM
Connectocut Representative
Flonda Senator
~~ ~orgoa R'!l!esentative
Mike
R~~
Gerald
_!!!!.. ~n
Carlin
Legislative Offoce
Buildi! ! Q _
Connectocut General Assemblr.
Flonda Legislature
_ Senate Office Buildong_
Georgia General AssembL._ ~ Box283
Coverdell Legoslative
Georgoa General Asse~ __Qffice Buoldong __
__MQI~
Flores
Jones
~axwell
Georaoa Representatove
Georgoa Senator
~goa R~resentallve
Geor111a Senator
Idaho Represen~
Idaho Re ~esentalive
Illinois Representative
~
-
Luechtefe~ - ~ois
Senator
Illinois Legoslature
Representatove
Indiana Re~esentative
Indiana R~esentatove
llhnC1!!.!:!11islature
Indiana ~_egoslature
tndoana Legislature
Indiana Senator
Indiana Legoslature
~')DIS
Yar~
Yoder
Georgoa R&Qresentatove
Millar
Bedke
Nonini
Mitchell
Noe
___!,IL R~ !!9._
~ ~p_ Mary Ann
Fomstall
Hanusa
Iowa Legoslature
Iowa Legislature
Calloway
Kansas Representative
Kansas L!!J~ature
.-J:.M~
RJ!p.
Amanda
Steve
Grosse rode
Hue ben
Kansas R'!l!esentative
Kansas R!e!esentatlve
Kansas Legislature
Kansas ~i slature
Bob
Marshall
Kansas Senator
Kansas Legislature
!:.~ Sen.
Kelly
Me19~
__!:rL Sen.
David
Givens
Kentuck~ Senator
Kentucky !:!llislature
__!!!__ ~ell_
Verll!!_
McGaha
Kentucky Senator
Kentuck1J:!alslature
Kentucky LBQISiature
.~
J!!p.
__!!!__ Rep.
LM
IM
~e,__
Sen.
Montell
K.!!'lucky Representative
~
K~
Waide
~yJ!!2.resentative
W~nters
Addia
_!!._ .B!p_ _
Jill
Joe
Frank
.J:M- ~Bit
__!,_IL
~p_
~ ~
ee;;--Sen
~I~
Brian
__I!!_
Waller
Kathy
D!!.,.
~ondra
!!L I!..Bl1..
~ R~P.
Pat _
Y!!_ Rep
Carol
LM
Gen
Sen
Kansas Reeresentat~
Brad
.1M_ ~~
LL
~chner
Kentuck~ Senator
-- Kansas Legislature
Kentucky Legislature
~ntucky L!!Jislature
Kentucky Representative
Kentuckl Legislature
Kentucky..!:!lJislature
Louisiana Legislature
Louisiana L~islatura
___!!g!!L._
Louisiana ReP.resentative
Louisiana Senator
MalnB Senator
Louisiana L!9islature
Louisiana Leg!_!ll!l!!!!_
Maine Legislature
Afzah
_Enckson
Garofalo
_!,llcFarlane
Olson
~ryland Delegate
~~nd
Minnesota
Repr~l'!!_
Minnesota Legislature
Minnesota Representative
Minnesota Senator
Legislature
Minnesota LegiSlature
Minnesota Representative
Minnesota L!Qslature
Mlnnes()~ l,llsislm!Jr!!
Buoldif'lg_
GA
Atlanta
,~
30334_
Atlanta
GA
CT
FL
,..w-
------:;oo
nores.anitere.web@flsenate. g~
~~ -8086
david@volecasas.com
(770) 490-7~
---
30334
(404) 463-5263
30334
30132
(4041..56-5024
mike.dudgeon@house.g'!,g_ov_ _ _
~)656-5143_
~4o4ifs3:4131
30334
.J404) 504-8116
83346
~~ 3342475
838~
r2oe) 3321000
6 i 433 _ (217 558-1040
{404) 231-9585
{ 2o8f 334539 7
-~ 334-5397
62706
j~ 782-8137
j~7) 782-4079
62706
(217) 782..0535
_
{217) 782-5257
J 317l 2329600
(317) 232-7644
(260) 402-273Q__ _(317) 232-9792
---Ts~
46738
46204-2785
fran.millar@wellsfargo.com
sbedke@house.idaho.qov
bnonini@icehouse.net
reddyunil1 @aol.corn
- - -1
___
~ffi 558-3481
sendavel@midwesl.net
carllnyoder2008@hotrnall.com
f--
66612-1504
67147
(~
785 296-1754
te~rrycalloway. com
~ 368-6365
66612-1504
66612 1504
(785) 296-7656
40601
(502~-8100
@Bl 5645508
~)564-6543
amanda@amanda4kansas.com
steve.huebertQ house.ks.gov
kell~~house.ks.go_v_ _ _ l
david.givens@lrc.ky.gov
1
I
vemie.mcgaha@lrc.ky.go
_ v_ _ _
r--
40601
1502)564-8100
502) 564-6543
40601
42075
(502) 564-8100
(502) 564-6543
ben.wald~lrc. k:t:- ~
kwcu@~ahoo.com
addia.wuchner@lrc.ky.gov;
wuch@lnsla!Jtbb.com
bradmonteiiG bellsouth.net
KY
41005
_j~ 564-8100
~) 564-6543
r--
Frankton
Gray_
West Monroe
KY
40601
_ 70359
71291
~ 474-7263
~5) 342-6945
! 1606)
- -_E!!!!Iharrisonfinancial.net
- ii!!.lOrk@lrc.kyjlOV
70804
!225) 342-6945
(225) 342-2040
(207) 287-1400
LA
LA
281-3221
11515) 281-6958
(712) 309-620! _
(620) 875-2061
re(lJmitchell@corncasl.net
o;:jnoe@msn.com
(51 ~)
66612 1504
(5741642-3940
50319
51503
Burlington
SuileA
900 Norlh
Third Street
Baton Rouge
LA
LA _ ___!!._
OQ.!l!!_sa _
_
r;te
Ellsworth
6 Bladen
Street
_Anna~ MD
100D r. Marlin
Luther King Jr.
State Office Building
Boulevard ~ul
MN
100Dr Marlin
Luthar King Jr.
State Office Building
Boulevard ~P!!!!_
~
100 Dr. Marlin
Luther King Jr
State Office BUIIdlnQ_ Boulevard
St. Paul
MN
75 Dr. MartinLuther Kong Jr.
Boulevard
St Paul
CaDilol
MN
State Capitol
724 Avenue F
11 South Street
Lowe House Office
Building
michael.mo~h~~~
.@!!) 414-5045
----
702 Cap1tal
Avenue
06106-1591 ~!1i_0-8700
32399-1100
( 850) 488-2831
30048..0283
(404) 656-0254
Hartford
Tallahassee
Ulbum
Capitol Annex
PO Drawer 1809
204 Nor1h 3rd Street
Kentucky Representative
Louisiana R~resentati ve
Louisiana R_tiPI'esentalive
Nevers
Ca~ itol
18 Capitol
Sguare
206
Washington
Street
206
Washington
Street
York
r-J;l_arrison
Hoffmann
r-!:ana!!Y
State
300 Capitol
Avenue
Room316
_j318) 362-4130_
.....2~
--J- _
4605
21401
4747638
~) 342-8336
[[~18) 362-4 1 31
hoffman!@!!llis.slate.la.us ___
j 504) 556-9972
lege~@.I!Qis. state. Ia.us
225) 342-0617 _ _ _ never~ls. state. la,us
(207) 2~ SenBrlen.l.englei'G!!IIislature.maine.gov
kathy.afzali@house.stata.md.us
55155
_l~5 1)
55155
i-.J~1 ~96-1069
296-5649
_(651 ) 296-8511
r!e.sondra erickson@house.mn
-----1--- ~e:I!!!J!arofa~ouse. mn
(651 ) 296-3949 ; - ! . . .
" ''carol.mcfarlane@house '!!!._.
55155
'(651 ) 296-6511
1651 ) 296-1282
sen.lleri.olson@senate .mn
gop
djuanawilson@schouse.gov;
Todd
Schlek~~
---'!!_~P:...
.J!Suehne _ _S
_Iy
.J!!!_r!!-ee_
H~IT}'
South Dakota
R~asantat1ve
State CaPitol
Brooks
Tennessee Represantatlva
Tennessee Legislature
......!!!_ ~P-
Kav1n
Brooks
Tennessee Representative
Tennessee legislature
--.!!!1_ _San.
Dolores
Gresham
Tennessee Senator
Tennessee L!Qislature
Tennessee Representative
Tennessee Leaislature
Legislative Plaza
Tennessee Senator
Tennessee Leglslatwe
Legislative Plaza
,~
Rep
John
...J:M_
Sen
Jm
~
cy-
~fl:....
Demel
Branch
Texas Ref1resentatva
Texas Leg1slatwa
Capitol Extension
Rob
Eissler
Texas Re~esantatlva
Texas Leaislature
Capitol Extension
Texas LeAISiatwa
Capitol Extension
Representative______Texas Legislature
CaPitol Extenson
..JJ..1._
_I.M_ Rap
Ragl!!l__
_ h"L. ~p ~_!!__
....!:!!_.I.B!E_
~
LM
Mom~ _ _Texas
D1ane
San.
Sen
Florence
Margaret
Keith
Patrick
Dayton
__!M_~
Howard
~M
-.!:_~- Del.
I-*.- Del
1M_ Sen.
Gro~er
~ ,__
Sen.
~xas
Representative
~~_
LM
Jenk1ns
Step11enson
Swns1on
Cola
Texas l!ijiSiatura
Utah legislatwe
Utah haoislatwe
Utah legislature
Utah Senator
Utah Representative
Utah Senator
UtahSenator
Cap1tol Extension
Utah Legislature
VirQ!ma General Assemblv
PlainCity _
POBox
145115
POBox
145030
- ~~
SO
57106
SO
57501-5070
(605) 381-9116
310-8600
.(605) 773-6806
TN
37243-0119
_(61)1_41-6879
(615) 253-0212
r!'Jl.harfl.brooks@capitol.tn.gov
TN
37243-0124
(6151741-1350
TN
37243
I(615) 253-0346
I(901) 465-6330
san.dolores.gresham@capitol.tn.gov
TN
37~Q_
.(615) 741-4400
TN
37243
J615) 741-1066
TX
78701
TX
78701
. ...TIL
78701
TX
78701
TX
UT
78701
84058
_!!L
84404
W 801)538-1035
UT
84114
(801)538-1035
SaltlakeCiw
~)
741-2255
~jlm. tra~~pilol.tn.gov
_!512L463~~~
322-9935
dbran~winstead.com
(512) 463-0797
(512~ 463-0898
rob.aisslar@house.state.tx.us
!i12) 463-0456
512) 463-3933
gearila.morrison_@!!_
ouse.stata.tx.us
512) 463-5896
diane.~housa.state.tx.us
~)
463-0624
(512) 463-0108
__!801) 538-1035
_(~01_1 538-1029
11~ ~~ 538-10~
22403
.!!!Q1} 69B-1~
1~ 326-1544
~) 538-1414 ~nkins@utahsenate.orll_
(801)538-1414
hslef1hensongutahsenate.org
(801 ) 326-1544
.(804) 698-6788 _
DeiMColaQhouse.vlrginia.go_v_ _
'!'fb-
t-
-----
Mr
Chaz
Cirame
linn
g AFF
Ms.
Mo1!!9!
Mastracco
STAFF
Miss
~TAFF ~ St~ie
~T~ ~
ST~E_ M_r_
~a
David
Ronald
Mulder
!'!ll'!!!!:!Ski
Scheberle
~I'9'Coordinator
11th~~~~
ALEC_ _ _
1101VermontAve.
ALEC
_ _11_01Verrnon1Ave
11thFioor
ALEC
11th Floor
ALEC
ALEC
ALEC
-~ 1th
Floor
11th Floor
ksumsion@utah.g~
DeiKCox@house.v~~
DeiSLandes@house.vi~inia.gov
district23\!!senate.virginia.go_v_ __
_ _ DeiBTata@house.virginia.go_v_ __
Becker.Randi@leg.wa.gov;
rbecker873@!1otmail.com _ _
Kevin.Parl<er@leg.wa.gov .
kevin.vande~g.wa. go_v_ __
____ john@overington.com
Sen.Grothman@!!gis.wisconsin.gov
ref1.knudson@!_eg~is,_,.Wl~.,.,g,ov,_____ 1
rep.marl<lein@legis.wi.gov
rep.thiesfeldt@legis.wi.g_ov_ __
_ _ _r_eL~@!!Igis.wi.g":'ov~--- l
Jamesda1 f!!!l-.sn
,~.co
=m"---- l
hcoe@!)!o~m~i~na~~:-~com=----l
_jeklund~o~m~i!-'lngo::.co=m_,_____
ajagg!@_!Yoming.com
_m~~ll:n~.co~""m;;~~~===:
-- -
CIRAME(!!GMAIL.CDM_i cciramea_atec.org
_{202)466~ ~~)466-3801
SlinnGalec.org,_ _ _ _ _,
~)466-3800
~) 466-3801
20005
~)466-3800
1~ 466-3801
Washington
Of
DC
20005
20005
~~
_!1_
ref1.kevin.brooks@capitol.tn.gov
~~hn.rag~capitol.tn.go
_y__
gA~~
ra~. sly@state.sd.us
773-6806
Colonial Hei~ VA
23834
_ !804} 698-1066
(804) 698-6766
Verona -- ~24482
( 8041_98-1025
~-6725
Ste. A _ __!ynchbu_rg- 'VA
2450L
(804) 698-~ .(804) 698-7651
~-~
Virginia Beach
VA
23462
- 1804)698-1085
.(804) 698-6785
215Sid
Irving R Newhouse
Snyder
....!:!!_ Sen
Rand
Becker
Wash1ng!on Senator
Washington Legislature
Building
Avenue, SW
01~ WA
98504
(360) 786-7573
(360)786-1999
~
R~ __!!vi~
Perl<er
i-- WashlJ'IQton Reprasentatlve
Washington legislature
P.O. Box 1093
Sookene
WA
99210
_{509) 455-7225
360 786-7317
LM
Rep
Kevin
~an De Wage Washington l8p!asentative
Washington legislature
10 Sable COW1
Seauim
WA
98382
(36ol786-791~
~ ~
John
OverinQion
West vlrainia Deleg~
West Virglnia Legislatwe
491 Hoffman Reed
Martinsbu[ll__ -rf_
25401
(304) 340-3148
~) 340-3389
~
Sen
Glenn
Grothmen
Wisconsin Senator
Wisconsin~i&latwe
State C!!j!ilol
PO Box 7882
Madison
WI 53707-7882 ~) 266?~ (608) 282-3560
__!,M
R_!!L
Dean
Knudson
Wisconsin Representativ~ Wisconsin l!Q~~
State CiiDltol
PO Box 8952
Madison
WI 53708-8952
(so8) 266-1526
---'=M_ ~ ~warL
Marl<lein
_ _S_tate ~~resentative
Wisconsin l!~jislature
State Capitol
PO Box 8952 ---.. Mad1son
WI B 708-8952 -~)266-7502
I.M._ ~~ _ JereJ!lt ~~~e!!!L_
Wisconsin Representative
Wisconsin l!~!!!!ature
604 Sunset Lane
Fond du Lac
WI
54935
__(608) 266-3156
~ep_ r-- _Evan
~~~~.'!.sin Representative
Wisconsin Legislature
Stat!! Caoitol
PO Box 8952
Madison
WI 53708-8952
(608) 266-9650
1 LM
Sen
Jam~
Anderson
-~~
~yarning legislature
92 Running Dutchman
Glenrock
.! !!L 82637 __@QI) 777-771! (307) 777-5466
200 West 24th
__!,_M
Sen _ H!!'!)' -Jp._e
- ~---;-;-, Wyom1ngSenator
___ om1011Leoslatura
StateCapitoi
Street
Ch~
82002
~II!?.:J 711
~,1777-5466
LM
Rep
John
Eklund
~omins.._Representative
---"7~nQ.leQislature
2918TornngtonHighway
Che)l!!!.ne
WY
82009
@07)246-3251
~307)777-5466
!:.~
Rep
Allen
___,!_~ _w~mingReprese!l~ -- ~omin~stature
POBox326
Lvman
~
82937
(307)777-7852
(307)777-5466
LM
Rep
Matt
Teeters
~2min.s~f1resentative ~y!11i_~g legislature
1520 Rd 70
WinQ!!
_ _ WY
~
_
@Q?l
777-7852
(307) 777-5466
1
Marv1n
Cox
R Steven
Landes
Stephen
Newman
Robert _
Tala
loddschlekeway@hotmail.com
!
Utahleglslature
Utah Represen~va
_j.'!!Jiima Del~
Sioux Falls
501 East
Capitol
Avenue
Pierre
7th Avenue
North
Nashville
7th Avenue
North
NashviUe
7th Avenue
North
Nashville
6th Avenue
North
Nashville
6th Avenue
North
Nashville
1100
Congress
Avenue
Aust1n
1100
Congress
Avenue
Austin
1100
Congress
Avenue
Austin
1100
Congress
Avenue
Austin
1100
Congress
Avenue
f---Austin
Orem
Washi ~
20005
(202) 466-3800
(202 ) 466-3801
Washnoton
lrvina
DC
TX
20005
75063
(202) 466-3800
(2141557-6769
(2021.466-3801
9721869-2258
mmastraccoQalec.org
bmulde!@_alec.org, _ _ _ _
1
dmyslinski@alec.org;
dave.mysllnski@grnail.com
_
ronscheberleimsbcolobal.net
(10)Through this process, DOE has usurped the power of the State to control the
curriculum and the methods of instruction and assessment in its public-education
system, in violation of Federal law prohibiting DOE from directing a State's
curriculum and of Amendment X to the United States Constitution.
(11) It is the intent of the Legislature to protect from Federal encroachment the
State's sovereignty in matters of education policy and to therefore nullify the
State's commitment to the CCSI standards.
Section 3.
The State Board of Education may not adopt, and the State Department of Education may
not implement, the Common Core State Standards developed by the Common Core
Standards Initiative. Any actions taken to adopt or implement the Common Core State
Standards as of the effective date of this section are void ab initio. Neither this nor any
other statewide education standards may be adopted or implemented without the approval
of the Legislature.