Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
AMSYCO 500-8-2
May-20-2011
00
NIL
Page 1 of 34
AM
SY
CO
:
:
:
:
Cover Page
PROJECT
CONTRACT
COPY # 1
COPY # 2
N/A
COPY # 3
N/A
Revision record :
Ver.No.
00
Date
May-20-2011
1. Originator
Ed Trotter
Specialized Equipment
Division Manager
ASNT Level III UT # XXXX
Sig. :
Changes Made
First Issue
Doc. Approver
Tae Young Shin
2.Reviewer
Keith Baldam
3. Approving Officer
Tae Young Shin
General Manager
ASNT Level III UT #11863
Sig. :
Sig. :
Procedure No.
First Issue Date
Revision No.
Revision Date
Title: Ultrasonic Contact Phased Array Examination
:
:
:
:
AMSYCO 500-8-2
May-20-2011
00
NIL
Page 2 of 34
Table of Contents
Cover Page................................................................................................................................... 1
1.0
Scope................................................................................................................................. 3
2.0
General Requirements ....................................................................................................... 3
3.0
Weld Configuration, Materials and Forms .......................................................................... 4
4.0
Ultrasonic Instrumentation ................................................................................................. 5
5.0
Examination ....................................................................................................................... 8
6.0
Procedure Qualification and Reference Calibration Blocks .............................................. 14
7.0
Acceptance / Rejection Criteria ........................................................................................ 14
8.0
Records and Report ......................................................................................................... 15
Drawing 1: Amplitude Reference Level Blocks ........................................................................... 17
Appendix A (Page 1 of 10).......................................................................................................... 18
Appendix A (Page 2 of 10).......................................................................................................... 19
Appendix A (Page 3 of 10).......................................................................................................... 20
Appendix A (Page 4 of 10).......................................................................................................... 21
Appendix A (Page 5 of 10).......................................................................................................... 22
Appendix A (Page 6 of 10).......................................................................................................... 23
Appendix A (Page 7 of 10).......................................................................................................... 24
Appendix A (Page 8 of 10).......................................................................................................... 25
Appendix A (Page 9 of 10).......................................................................................................... 26
Appendix A (Page 10 of 10)........................................................................................................ 27
Appendix B: Specific Instructions and Report Form (Page 1 of 5) .............................................. 28
Appendix C (Page 1 of 8) ........................................................................................................... 29
Appendix C (Page 2 of 8) ........................................................................................................... 30
Appendix C (Page 3 of 8) ........................................................................................................... 31
Procedure No.
First Issue Date
Revision No.
Revision Date
Title: Ultrasonic Contact Phased Array Examination
:
:
:
:
AMSYCO 500-8-2
May-20-2011
00
NIL
Page 3 of 34
1.0 Scope
1.1. This procedure is used for the Ultrasonic examination of Welds and the dimensioning of
indications for comparison with standards established in the acceptance/rejection criteria
included in this document.
1.2. The following information is included in this procedure:
1.2.1.
1.2.2.
1.2.3.
1.2.4.
Calibration Blocks
1.2.5.
1.2.6.
Acceptance/Rejection criteria
1.2.7.
1.2.8.
Report requirements
2.1.2.
2.1.3.
2.1.4.
2.1.5.
2.1.6.
2.1.7.
2.1.8.
2.1.9.
2.1.10. Discrimination between geometric and flaw indications, indications sizing technique
2.2. Reference Documents
2.2.1.
Procedure No.
First Issue Date
Revision No.
Revision Date
:
:
:
:
AMSYCO 500-8-2
May-20-2011
00
NIL
Page 4 of 34
2.2.2.
2.2.3.
2.3.2.
The AMSYCO Written Practice for Personnel Qualification and Certification in Non
Destructive Testing shall be used as a reference.
2.3.3.
2.3.4.
A Level III ASNT certified inspector will review and assure the quality of the
inspection results. The final data package shall be reviewed by a UT Level III
individual.
Basic Calibration Blocks: These blocks are used for general instrument calibration
and performance verification. The manufacturer of Omniscan has a specific
sequence for calibration of the instrument. This information is included in Appendix
A of this document. The blocks required for this general instrument calibration are
the IIW type blocks and side drill hole blocks as described in that appendix.
3.3.2.
Reference Calibration Block: Piping calibration blocks (See figure from T434.3 at
Drawing 1) of the same nominal size and schedule shall be used. Alternatively, the
Basic Calibration block (Drawing 1) and provisions of T434.1.7 may be used where
it is demonstrated that sidedrilled hole sensitivity is equal to or greater than that of
the ID and OD notches. This demonstration shall be documented and on a probe
specific basis.
3.4.2.
3.4.3.
Obstructions and other accessories located from the weld center line within 6 times
the thickness of the base material.
3.4.4.
Procedure No.
First Issue Date
Revision No.
Revision Date
Title: Ultrasonic Contact Phased Array Examination
:
:
:
:
AMSYCO 500-8-2
May-20-2011
00
NIL
Page 5 of 34
3.4.5.
Root characteristics, including the presence of backing strips, counter bore and
geometry.
3.4.6.
Welding technique
3.4.7.
Root and Hot passes NDE inspection requirements, inspection results and repairs.
4.1.2.
The Omniscan software used for this service will be revision 2.0R2 or newer. This
needs to be compatible with the AMSYCOS license for operation of the TOMO
VIEW PostAnalysis software.
The analysis of the data will be performed using the RDTech, TOMOVIEW 2.4 or
newer, installed in a Laptop computer.
4.2.2.
In order to analyze this data, the files will be transferred to this computer at the end
of inspection of every weld, or with the frequency and conditions indicated later in
this Procedure.
4.3. Transducer
4.3.1.
A 16 element (or higher) phase array transducer will be used for this test. Model
and Serial number will be recorded in the Specific Instructions, See Appendix B.
4.4.2.
The encoder will be calibrated so that the accuracy shall be within 1% per 20
inches of scanning length.
4.4.3.
The transducer will be mounted in such a manner that probe spacing from the weld
centerline will be maintained. An automated or semiautomated device (carriage,
sledge, cradle, etc.) appropriate for component geometry and capable of ensuring
accurate x and y coordinate movement shall be used. Circumferential movement of
the apparatus can be manually assisted.
4.4.4.
5 MHz will be used for base materials with thickness not exceeding 1.0 inches.
Procedure No.
First Issue Date
Revision No.
Revision Date
Title: Ultrasonic Contact Phased Array Examination
:
:
:
:
AMSYCO 500-8-2
May-20-2011
00
NIL
Page 6 of 34
4.5.2.
2 MHz will be used for base materials from 1.0 to 6.0 inches.
4.5.3.
4.6. Wedge: A 45 or 60 Wedge can be used for this inspection. Angular shear waves are
produced and used for this inspection.
4.7. Wedge Shape: For parts with diameters below 20 in diameter; wedge shaping is allowed to
help on the coupling and transducer stability, using carbide inserts to provide stability to the
wedge can also be used. The same wedge design, and/or carbide insert positions should
be used for the qualification of the test procedure.
4.8. Phase Array Technique and Angle Interval
4.8.1.
This procedure requires the use of SScan and/or LScan techniques and views.
A, B, and CScans are also used for the detection and sizing of flaws.
4.8.2.
The technique used in this procedure is not based in amplitude for the detection or
flaw sizing. Other techniques are used for this purpose as described later.
4.8.3.
DAC and other amplitude based references are not allowed for detection or sizing.
4.8.4.
The instrument will be calibrated in Sensitivity and Delay for a interval not
exceeding 35 to Any restriction on the angle interval calibration will be considered
on the design of the specific scanning technique, and included in the Specific
Instructions as described later.
The area within 4 times the thickness of the base material from the weld center line
has to be free from spattering, loose materials, and other surface condition that will
prevent the transducer from getting and keeping acoustic coupling.
4.9.2.
The material used for coupling will provide enough wetability to avoid any air
bubbles to build in the shoe/material interface.
4.9.3.
The coupling product should not be detrimental to the material being examined
4.9.4.
The Brand name and grade of the couplant used will be recorded in the report for
this service.
4.9.5.
Coupling between the transducer and the wedge shall be visually checked every 4
hours.
Procedure No.
First Issue Date
Revision No.
Revision Date
Title: Ultrasonic Contact Phased Array Examination
:
:
:
:
AMSYCO 500-8-2
May-20-2011
00
NIL
Page 7 of 34
Procedure No.
First Issue Date
Revision No.
Revision Date
Title: Ultrasonic Contact Phased Array Examination
:
:
:
:
AMSYCO 500-8-2
May-20-2011
00
NIL
Page 8 of 34
Where:
ID7777: Is the weld identification number as indicated by the Customer
US or DS: Upstream or Downstream, as explained in Paragraph 5.64
P1: Scan Position Sequence
####: Scan serial number.
NOTE: These names will be kept in the log book.
4.10.4.3. Those scans that are considered Valid will be marked as OK, the scans
that will not be used for analysis will be marked as N/G, not good. This will
be stated in the Comments column of the Scans Table.
4.10.4.4. Data BackUp: The data files and setup files will be backedup in other media
every weld. The backup data will be kept in two different media at the same
time.
5.0 Examination
5.1.
Specific Instructions: Specific instructions (scan plans) will be prepared and submitted for
review and approval prior to examinations.
5.1.1.
5.1.2.
Appendix B Is the form that will be used for the specific instructions for each weld.
This form includes all the information necessary to perform the weld inspection in
accordance with this Test Procedure.
5.1.3.
Specific instructions for each weld will be specified before the start of the inspection.
5.1.4.
The specific instructions will cover details regarding the weld and bevel geometry,
part geometry, diameters and other information that is used for the specific
examination on each weld.
5.1.5.
5.1.6.
The specific instructions are part of this procedure and will be Qualified under then
Procedure Qualification program.
5.1.7.
The following information and other discussed previously will be included in those
instructions:
The ultrasonic examination shall include the volume of the weld plus the heat
affected zone.
5.2.2.
Procedure No.
First Issue Date
Revision No.
Revision Date
Title: Ultrasonic Contact Phased Array Examination
:
:
:
:
AMSYCO 500-8-2
May-20-2011
00
NIL
Page 9 of 34
5.2.3.
The scan plan drawing [crosssection] will need to show complete coverage and
include material type(P# is OK), beam plots, refracted angles, probe index spacing
(from weld centerline), overlap, frequencies, thickness, crosssection geometry,
weld joint configuration and dimensions, weld crown width and profile, two
directional beam coverage (minimum), and location of calibration reflectors.
5.2.4.
The scan plan will be used to define the transducer positions to the weld centerline
and be included in the Specific Instructions. This document will be attached to the
Specific Instructions document presented in Appendix B.
Straight Beam Inspection: The volume of metal that will be used to transmit sound
from either side of the weld will be examined to detect planar reflectors or other
inclusions that may prevent the efficient transmission of the sound in these areas.
5.3.2.
Reflectors Parallel to the Weld Seam: The welds will be scanned to detect any flaws
that are located parallel to the weld center line within the examination coverage
volume.
5.3.3.
5.3.3.1.
The welds will be scanned to detect any flaws that are located transversal to
the weld center line within the examination coverage volume.
5.3.3.2.
The ultrasonic transducer shall be aimed parallel to the weld centerline. The
transducer will be manipulated so that the ultrasonic beam passthrough all
the examination volume and adjacent base metal. Scanning shall be done in
two directions 180. to each other and on both sides of the weld to the extent
possible. Areas blocked by geometric condition shall be examined at least
one direction. Any indication detected will be sized with the techniques
indicated later and compared with the Acceptance/Rejection criteria included
in this test procedure.
5.4.2.
Using Phase Array technologies allows for increasing the probability of detection
based on the presence of sound in a diverse interval of angles interrogating the
weld.
5.4.3.
It is also clear that fusion lines, inclusions and other flaws are oriented primarily in
the same angle as the weld bevel face.
5.4.4.
Plotting or simulation of the weld shall be used to ensure that 100% of the volume of
the weld and the HAZ are inspected.
5.4.5.
5.4.5.1.
Procedure No.
First Issue Date
Revision No.
Revision Date
Title: Ultrasonic Contact Phased Array Examination
:
:
:
:
AMSYCO 500-8-2
May-20-2011
00
NIL
Page 10 of 34
5.4.5.2.
5.4.5.3.
The fusion face inspected shall not be more that the area covered by an
interval of 5 from the calculated maximum amplitude angle.
5.4.5.4.
It is expected that for thickness of 1.5 inches or less at least 2 scans will be
necessary and 3 or more will be necessary for thickness of more than 1.5
inches.
5.4.5.5.
The crown of the weld shall be inspected using the smallest angle that allows
the shortest sound path in a fullskip (i.e. 4055).
5.4.5.6.
The root and the midwall of the weld shall be inspected with the angle that on
the first leg reaches the area with the shortest sound path. (i.e. 5065).
5.4.5.7.
The phase array instrument is calibrated for SScan angular aperture within 35 to
70, as indicated in the specific instructions for each weld design. Using this angular
interval will increase the probability of detection of flaws within the weld and the
HAZ.
Procedure No.
First Issue Date
Revision No.
Revision Date
Title: Ultrasonic Contact Phased Array Examination
:
:
:
:
AMSYCO 500-8-2
May-20-2011
00
NIL
Page 11 of 34
5.5.2.
5.5.2 Special attention will be placed to those angles that are expected to produce
maximum amplitude from reflectors located at the fusion face, crown toe cracks or
weld root flaws.
5.5.3.
The angular interval must ensure that 100% of the volume and the HAZ are
interrogated.
5.5.4.
The Specific instructions will indicate the number and position of the Scans
performed on each weld.
5.6.2.
Information regarding the length of each scan and file designation will also be
included in that document.
5.6.3.
A zero and scan direction stamp will be premarked on the welds to inspect, and will
be used as reference start point for all measurements and for scanning direction.
The symbol used will be:
>
5.6.4.
The zero marking will be designated as 12:00 oclock position. The Index and Scan
definitions indicated will be used as references for indication and scans positions
and directions. Forward or Downstream and Backward or UpStream direction are
defined as follows:
5.6.5.
If an obstruction is present on the scan transducer path, stop and save the file at the
point before the obstruction and continue after the obstruction. The names of both
Procedure No.
First Issue Date
Revision No.
Revision Date
Title: Ultrasonic Contact Phased Array Examination
:
:
:
:
AMSYCO 500-8-2
May-20-2011
00
NIL
Page 12 of 34
files and the distance between the stop and the start will be documented and
included.
5.7. Scanning Sensitivity Level, DAC Curve and Discontinuity Detection
5.7.1.
5.7.2.
Piping calibration blocks (See figure from T434.3 at Drawing 1) of the same
nominal size and schedule shall be used. Alternatively, the Basic Calibration block
(Drawing 1) and provisions of T434.1.7 may be used where it is demonstrated that
sidedrilled hole sensitivity is equal to or greater than that of the ID and OD notches.
This demonstration shall be documented and on a probespecific basis.
5.7.3.
The calibration block shall comply with the dimensions and characteristics included
in the Table, General Notes and Note included in Drawing 1.
5.7.4.
A DAC Curve shall be established using the reflectors included in the Basic
Calibration Block. The angle beam shall be directed toward the calibration reflector
that yields the maximum response, and the instrument shall be set to obtain an 80%
of full screen height indication. This shall be the reference level.
5.7.5.
5.7.6.
This calibration shall establish the sweep range and the distance amplitude
correction.
5.7.7.
The examination coverage volume will be scanned with a Hardware Gain (Hard
Gain) at Reference Level plus no more than 6 dB. The detection analysis in TOMO
VIEW will be performed with gain at Reference Level plus at least 6 db more gain,
but not more than 14 db of Software Gain (Soft Gain) than the reference gain used
during the actual scanning.
5.7.8.
This process is intended for the detection of discontinuities, both relevant (flaws)
and nonrelevant (geometric, metallurgical).
5.7.9.
Sizing of these discontinuities will be performed using the methods indicated later.
All indications that produced reflection exceeding 20% of the Reference Level shall
be recorded and investigated.
5.8.2.
5.8.2.1.
5.8.2.2.
Interpret the area containing the reflector in accordance with the Notes and
Recommendations included in APPENDIX C.
Procedure No.
First Issue Date
Revision No.
Revision Date
Title: Ultrasonic Contact Phased Array Examination
:
:
:
:
AMSYCO 500-8-2
May-20-2011
00
NIL
Page 13 of 34
5.8.2.4.
5.8.2.5.
5.8.2.6.
5.8.3.
5.8.3.1.
5.8.3.2.
5.8.3.3.
Instrument SetUp: gate length and positioning are required for flaw
detection and sizing of indications. The starting position of the gate will
have to include all parts of the first leg data excluding the wedge noise
which shows up in the initial part of the first leg. The gate should also
include the information up to half way of the third leg. This way we get
information about what is happening in the entire metal path and no
indication will be lost.
b)
Procedure No.
First Issue Date
Revision No.
Revision Date
:
:
:
:
AMSYCO 500-8-2
May-20-2011
00
NIL
Page 14 of 34
c)
d)
Flaw Length Sizing: For deeper ID/OD indications: The amplitude fall off
is gradual for a while and then drops off suddenly. The sudden dropoff
points are going to be the ends of the indication.
For Shallow ID/OD indications: In this case, the energy of the beam
hitting the flaw is not very high. Hence, the amplitude response is not
going to follow the profile of the indication. In this case, the amplitude
change will be gradual. The sizing will be taken to the end of the visible
indication or a 20% amplitude change in the signal.
For MidWall indications: The sizing of the length will be treated in a
similar fashion to the sizing of the deep and shallow ID/OD indications.
7.3.2.
For thickness (t) from up to 2.5 the indication length is more than t/3
Procedure No.
First Issue Date
Revision No.
Revision Date
Title: Ultrasonic Contact Phased Array Examination
:
:
:
:
AMSYCO 500-8-2
May-20-2011
00
NIL
Page 15 of 34
7.3.3.
For thickness above 2.5 the indication length is more than 0.750.
7.3.4.
NOTE: If the weld joins two members having different thicknesses at the weld, t is
the thinner of these thicknesses.
8.2.2.
8.2.3.
8.2.4.
Search unit ID, s/n, type, frequency, and element size and number, couplant type.
8.2.5.
8.2.6.
Special equipment used i.e. Scanner manufacturer and model, Data acquisition
increment
8.2.7.
8.2.8.
8.2.9.
Procedure No.
First Issue Date
Revision No.
Revision Date
Title: Ultrasonic Contact Phased Array Examination
:
:
:
:
AMSYCO 500-8-2
May-20-2011
00
NIL
Page 16 of 34
8.3. Deliverables: The report formats are included as Appendix B on this procedure.
8.3.1.
A handwritten Report will be generated for each weld, and will be delivered to the
customer indicating the position of rejectable indications, if any.
8.3.2.
The rejectable indications will be marked on the surface of pipe with a paintpen
showing their position and length.
The data and setup files will be transferred to a PCComputer harddisk every
weld.
8.4.2.
The data and setup files and any other electronic documentation will be backedup
in a external harddisk drive or stick memory.
8.4.3.
All the data and documents will be stored in a external harddisk for permanent
storage. Two copies will be made. The customer will receive a copy and
AMSYCO'S will retain the other copy.
Procedure No.
First Issue Date
Revision No.
Revision Date
Title: Ultrasonic Contact Phased Array Examination
:
:
:
:
AMSYCO 500-8-2
May-20-2011
00
NIL
Page 17 of 34
Procedure No.
First Issue Date
Revision No.
Revision Date
Title: Ultrasonic Contact Phased Array Examination
:
:
:
:
AMSYCO 500-8-2
May-20-2011
00
NIL
Page 18 of 34
Procedure No.
First Issue Date
Revision No.
Revision Date
Title: Ultrasonic Contact Phased Array Examination
:
:
:
:
AMSYCO 500-8-2
May-20-2011
00
NIL
Page 19 of 34
Procedure No.
First Issue Date
Revision No.
Revision Date
Title: Ultrasonic Contact Phased Array Examination
:
:
:
:
AMSYCO 500-8-2
May-20-2011
00
NIL
Page 20 of 34
Procedure No.
First Issue Date
Revision No.
Revision Date
Title: Ultrasonic Contact Phased Array Examination
:
:
:
:
AMSYCO 500-8-2
May-20-2011
00
NIL
Page 21 of 34
Procedure No.
First Issue Date
Revision No.
Revision Date
Title: Ultrasonic Contact Phased Array Examination
:
:
:
:
AMSYCO 500-8-2
May-20-2011
00
NIL
Page 22 of 34
Procedure No.
First Issue Date
Revision No.
Revision Date
Title: Ultrasonic Contact Phased Array Examination
:
:
:
:
AMSYCO 500-8-2
May-20-2011
00
NIL
Page 23 of 34
Procedure No.
First Issue Date
Revision No.
Revision Date
Title: Ultrasonic Contact Phased Array Examination
:
:
:
:
AMSYCO 500-8-2
May-20-2011
00
NIL
Page 24 of 34
Procedure No.
First Issue Date
Revision No.
Revision Date
Title: Ultrasonic Contact Phased Array Examination
:
:
:
:
AMSYCO 500-8-2
May-20-2011
00
NIL
Page 25 of 34
Procedure No.
First Issue Date
Revision No.
Revision Date
Title: Ultrasonic Contact Phased Array Examination
:
:
:
:
AMSYCO 500-8-2
May-20-2011
00
NIL
Page 26 of 34
Procedure No.
First Issue Date
Revision No.
Revision Date
Title: Ultrasonic Contact Phased Array Examination
:
:
:
:
AMSYCO 500-8-2
May-20-2011
00
NIL
Page 27 of 34
Procedure No.
First Issue Date
Revision No.
Revision Date
Title: Ultrasonic Contact Phased Array Examination
:
:
:
:
AMSYCO 500-8-2
May-20-2011
00
NIL
Page 28 of 34
Procedure No.
First Issue Date
Revision No.
Revision Date
Title: Ultrasonic Contact Phased Array Examination
:
:
:
:
AMSYCO 500-8-2
May-20-2011
00
NIL
Page 29 of 34
Appendix C (Page 1 of 8)
Identifications of flaws in the welded joint can be performed based in three independent criteria or
by combination of either technique.
These techniques are:
The following tables have descriptions for each one of these techniques:
Procedure No.
First Issue Date
Revision No.
Revision Date
Title: Ultrasonic Contact Phased Array Examination
Appendix C (Page 2 of 8)
Figure 1: Echodynamics examples
:
:
:
:
AMSYCO 500-8-2
May-20-2011
00
NIL
Page 30 of 34
Procedure No.
First Issue Date
Revision No.
Revision Date
Title: Ultrasonic Contact Phased Array Examination
:
:
:
:
AMSYCO 500-8-2
May-20-2011
00
NIL
Page 31 of 34
Appendix C (Page 3 of 8)
Figure 3: Weld areas identification and flaw position.
Procedure No.
First Issue Date
Revision No.
Revision Date
Title: Ultrasonic Contact Phased Array Examination
:
:
:
:
AMSYCO 500-8-2
May-20-2011
00
NIL
Page 32 of 34
difficult to evaluate as one or another condition. If seen mostly by the LCP probe it is called LCP
and if seen mostly with the Root probe but with some LCP component it is called a Root indication.
LCP:
Lack of Cross Penetration both identifies the defect and is the term used to identify the zone at the
weld land area. This can be associated with the internal welding machine not depositing the bead
deep enough, the hot pass weld not penetrating deep enough or is often associated with conditions
of high low. With welder problems the condition may be more symmetric (seen with approximately
equal length and amplitude upstream and downstream) whereas high low conditions could cause
one side to be more pronounced that the other. The adjacent channels (Root and hot pass 1) are
usually examined to see if the LCP extends inwards or outwards.
Nonfusion
Hot Pass:
With its 45 orientation, the hot pass bevel was a difficult problem for radiographic testing. Due to
the surface length of this area it has been divided into 2 zones, hot pass 1 and hot pass 2. UT
signals here are clear and due to the large angular difference between the 45 hot pass bevel and
the 90 LCP below it and the 85 Fill above, signals from the hot pass zone are not confused with
adjacent zone defects. (If they were detectable by RT these would have been called LFSS).
Lack of Fusion Fill 1:
The sources of this defect are the same as for any nonfusion defect in the fill passes. Fill 1 non
fusion is often associated with the corner where the hot pass bevel and the fill bevel meets.
Lack of Fusion Fill 2 and 3:
This defect can be simple sidewall nonfusion, or it may have a component of cold lap to the Fill 1
pass. In light wall pipe only 2 fill pass probes are used to cover the Fill 1, Fill 2 and Cap passes.
Undercut, if deeper than 1 mm would occur in the Fill 2 zone as well. The operator cannot
discriminate where the nonfusion exists. This must be determined by the hand scanner who would
have to plot any defects called for repair. If during the manual evaluation no undercut is seen it is
assumed the flaw is subsurface. For heavier wall pipe where 3 or 4 fills are required the concerns
are the same as for fills 1 & 2.
Stacked Defects:
When a welder stops a weld in the middle of the process (to clean a cup or clear bad wire, etc.,
they must then restart the weld in the same area. If the arc stutters or the stop was not properly
cleaned out a vertical component will be seen that can extend to 2 or more zones. If the chart
indicates the situation exists on 3 or more adjacent zones, it is recommended to investigate further
using manual ultrasonics even if length is less than 25mm.
Procedure No.
First Issue Date
Revision No.
Revision Date
Title: Ultrasonic Contact Phased Array Examination
:
:
:
:
AMSYCO 500-8-2
May-20-2011
00
NIL
Page 33 of 34
Burnthrough:
This occurs when the heat of the melt is sufficient to weaken the weld metal laid down previously
and pokes through thereby removing a volume of metal from the inside surface of the weld/pipe.
The amount of material may be very small, typically 56 mm diameter and only be sufficient to
remove the bead surface. This would produce little or no indication on the root probe channel.
However, if the situation is more pronounced, metal could be removed from the hot pass and bead
as well as material from the parent metal. This would be seen on Root, LCP and 1 or 2 hot pass
zones. Associated with this stacked indication would be an arrival time sooner than the normal non
fusion and some degree of symmetry.
Porosity:
Caused by gasification of impurities on the weld prep. surface or by loss of shielding gas, porosity
is seen by the standard probes in the Root and LCP zones. For fill and hot pass occurring porosity,
a special probe is incorporated into the system. Signals will typically have irregular amplitudes in
the amplitude gates and irregular arrival times in the time gates although with such short time
intervals as exist in the Root and LCP this is more difficult to see.
Some symmetry is often noted and if the porosity is heavy, the geometry signal seen from the weld
surface will be reduced or even eliminated.
Porosity Bead (See image part: Root Bead Porosity)
Porosity Fill
(See image part: Typical Porosity)
Centerline Cracking:
If too much weld metal is deposited too quickly the heat gradient in the weld nugget will cause
shrinkage cracking to occur as it solidifies (also called solidification cracking or shrinkage cracking).
This is not likely to occur in the root pass but may occur in any pass made from the outside
surface. As this is likely to pass right through the weld nugget its amplitude is usually large and
symmetry exists. On a radiograph the crack edges are very fine and may not show clearly, it would
then be misinterpreted as LCP as it is approximately centered.
Geometry HighLow:
Not a defect, high low is a geometry condition caused by ovality or poor mechanical fit. Care must
be taken by the operator to ensure the indications originating from this are not called for repair.
However, this condition can cause genuine defects and the two must be discernible. Large
differences in root transit times are usually an indication of high low.
Bead Offset (or wander):
Procedure No.
First Issue Date
Revision No.
Revision Date
Title: Ultrasonic Contact Phased Array Examination
:
:
:
:
AMSYCO 500-8-2
May-20-2011
00
NIL
Page 34 of 34
Internal welding is performed using 6 welding heads arranged to align with the weld centerline. If
not correctly set one or more heads will deviate from the central position. This may be a head
starting on one side and crossing the centerline or it may be a head that moves straight but is offset
upstream or downstream. Root transit time indicates this condition.
Other Transition (counterbore):
To allow heavy wall and light wall pipe to be joined the heavy wall pipe is counter bored to the
same thickness as the light wall. If the counter bore is made as a taper the counter bored side
cannot be UT inspected as the skip angles are no longer correct. If the counter bore is parallel
inspection is possible but ovality may result in some areas being thicker than they should be.
These results in the gated regions being incorrect for the sound path traveled.