Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/index.asp
editor@iaeme.com
Column Study of The Adsorption of Phosphate by Using Drinking Water Treatment Sludge
and Red Mud
1. INTRODUCTION
Phosphorus (P) is an essential nutrient for the growth of organisms in most
ecosystems, but superfluous phosphorus can also cause eutrophication and hence
deteriorate water quality. Phosphorus is released into aquatic environments in many
ways, of which the most significant are human industrial, agricultural, and mining
activities. Although phosphorus removal is required before discharging wastewater
into bodies of water, phosphorus pollution is nevertheless increasing. Therefore, there
is currently an urgent demand for improved phosphorus removal methods which can
be applied before wastewater discharge. In wastewater treatment, enhanced biological
phosphorus removal (EBPR) is becoming an increasingly popular alternative to
chemical precipitation (CP) because of its lower costs and reduced sludge production.
Much water treatment sludge is produced in the production of service water and
drinking water. It is impossible to prevent the production of water treatment sludge.
The water treatment sludge is liquid and solid and is regarded as a waste.
Consequently, the water treatment sludge must be handled in accordance with
regulations in forces. The quantity of the water treatment sludge is rather high. The
water treatment sludge is placed mostly in landfills. In some countries, for instance in
the Netherlands, about 25 per cent of the produced water treatment sludge is re-used,
(Miroslav, 2008).
It is still an issue to choose a disposal or liquidation method for the water
treatment sludge that would be reasonable in terms of technology and economy.
According to environment protection regulations it is required to minimise the
quantity of wastes produced. If possible, the wastes should be re-used or processed as
secondary raw materials as much as possible. If this is not possible, the solid wastes
should be put back in the environment where the space occupied should be as little as
possible and minimum costs should be incurred, (Moldan et al., 1990).
Phosphorus removal from wastewater has been widely investigated and several
techniques have been developed including adsorption methods, physical processes
(settling, filtration), chemical precipitation (with aluminum, iron and calcium salts),
and biological processes that rely on biomass growth (bacteria, algae, plants) or
intracellular bacterial polyphosphates accumulation (de-Bashan et al., 2004).
Recently, the removal of phosphate from aqueous solutions via adsorption has
attracted much attention. The key problem for many phosphorus adsorption methods,
however, is finding an efficient adsorbent. Several low-cost or easily available clays,
waste materials and by-products.
http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/index.asp
editor@iaeme.com
Quantitative composition
E.C, s/cm
T.D.S, mg/L
Salinity, mg/L
Total hardness, as CaCo3, mg/L
pH
Mg, mg/L
Ca, mg/L
So4, mg/L
Cl, mg/L
Po4, mg/L
No3, mg/L
T.S.S, mg/L
BOD5, mg/L
COD, mg/L
DO, mg/L
Fecal coliform, mpn/100 ml
Total coliform, mpn/100 ml
3.5
1288
2.18
1200
7.9
232.8
160.3
769.4
289.9
2.7
0.46
40
32
54
2.3
120000
128000
2.2 Adsorbent
Two types of adsorbent were used in the present study for adsorption of phosphate
from secondary effluents of wastewater treatment plant they are:
1. Drinking Water Treatment Sludge (DWTS),
2. Red Mud (RM).
http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/index.asp
10
editor@iaeme.com
Column Study of The Adsorption of Phosphate by Using Drinking Water Treatment Sludge
and Red Mud
water treatment. Depending on the quality of the treated water, the water treatment
sludge contains suspensions of inorganic and organic substances.
The (DWTS) used in this study was taken from the sedimentation tanks of AlTayara drinking water treatment plant, in Al-Hilla city, Iraq. This sludge was dried at
atmospheric temperature for 5 days, and then sieved on 2 mm mesh to achieve
satisfactory uniformity. The sludge had a particle size distribution ranged from 150
m to 10 mm (Fig. 1) with an effective grain size, d10, of 250 m, a median grain size,
d50, of 460 m and a uniformity coefficient, Cu= d60/d10, of 2.24.
% of cumulative passing
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
0.1
10
Quantitative composition
4.29
620
312
0.2
8.1
15.76
3.6
15.32
0.63
3.66
11.56
15.16
45
11
editor@iaeme.com
20m are also available [Liu et al., 2011].The mesh size of red mud used in the study
was of 1mm. This size was obtained by sieving analysis using the American Sieve
Standards in the building of Materials Engineering laboratory at the University of
Babylon. Its composition, property and phase vary with the type of the bauxite and the
alumina production process, and also change over time. The chemical composition of
the red mud is given in Table 3.
As a pre-treatment, (RM) was crushed and sieved to get granular (RM)with
particle size of 0.425 mm to be used in present experiments as shown in Fig. 2.The
granular (RM) was firstly washed with distilled water and then dried in an electric
oven at 120C, overnight. This time was usually enough to remove any undesired
moisture within the particles. It was then placed in desiccators for cooling.
120
% of cumulative passing
100
80
60
40
20
0
0.1
10
Quantitative composition, %
Fe2O3
Al2O3
SiO2
CaO
Na2O
TiO2
K 2O
Sc2O3
V2O5
Nb2O5
TREO
Loss
26.41
18.94
8.52
21.84
4.75
7.40
0.068
0.76
0.34
0.008
0.012
9.71
http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/index.asp
12
editor@iaeme.com
Column Study of The Adsorption of Phosphate by Using Drinking Water Treatment Sludge
and Red Mud
4. EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
The reactor setup (Fig. 3) used in the present study is constructed of pyrex glass tube
of (100 cm) height, and (7.5 cm) internal diameter. The column was made in a
methacrylate cylinder, thus allowing for visual examination of the progress of the
wetting front and detection of preferential flow channels along the column walls. The
column dimensions were defined to minimize the occurrence of channeling by
making the column diameter at least 30 times the maximum particle size found in the
material used. The column dimensions also met the minimum length-to-diameter
requirement (Relyea, 1982). This means the column length (100 cm) must be four
times greater than its diameter (7.5 cm). Attached to the lower part of the column was
a plastic funnel, inside which a perforated fiberglass plate was installed to support the
columns methacrylate structure. The plate was covered by a mesh to act as a filter
and to retain the porous medium. The entire device was mounted on top of a metal
structure that allowed its height above the surface and the verticality of the column to
be regulated (Fig. 3). The column was packed with (DWTS) and (RM) in different
ratios as filter. Fluid entered the column, previously saturated with the wastewater.
Contaminant up gradient wastewater (Table 1) was used to flow through the layer of
packed materials. A constant-head reservoir of 50 liter volume polyethylene container
was used to deliver influent wastewater at a flow rate of 5 mL/min. The sample was
collected as a function of time at the bottom of the column through a 30 liter
polyethylene container to collect the effluent solution. Two valves were used to
control the desired flow rate through the adsorption column. The first sample,
corresponding to time 0, was taken when water started to flow from the lower part of
the column. Samples were filtered through 0.45m cellulose acetate filters.
13
editor@iaeme.com
Ce /C
0.8
0.6
DWTS
0.4
RM
0.2
0
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
Time, min.
Figure 4 Experimental breakthrough curves for adsorption of phosphate onto DWTS and RM
at C=4 mg/L, pH=4, Temp. = 25 C, H= 25 cm.
http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/index.asp
14
editor@iaeme.com
Column Study of The Adsorption of Phosphate by Using Drinking Water Treatment Sludge
and Red Mud
Fig. 4 shows that the two adsorbents used in present study are efficient in the
removal of phosphate. The use of (RM) reduces the operating time by about 21%
compared to the use of (DWTS). It is obvious from this figure that the breakthrough
curves for the two adsorbents used are of S shape.
C /C
0.8
0.6
C=2.7 mg/L
C=4 mg/L
0.4
0.2
0
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
Time, min.
http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/index.asp
15
editor@iaeme.com
1.2
C=2.7 mg/L
C=4 mg/L
C/C
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
0
100
200
300
Time, min.
400
500
600
http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/index.asp
16
editor@iaeme.com
Column Study of The Adsorption of Phosphate by Using Drinking Water Treatment Sludge
and Red Mud
1.2
1
C /C
0.8
H=25 cm
0.6
H=20 cm
0.4
H=15 cm
H=10 cm
0.2
H=5 cm
0
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
Time, min.
0.07
0.06
0.05
0.04
0.03
0.02
0.01
0
0
10
15
20
25
30
Figure 8 Effect of different bed depth on the adsorption capacity of DWTS (Q=5 mL/min,
C=4 mg/L, pH=4, Temp=25 C).
http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/index.asp
17
editor@iaeme.com
(DWTS) particles represent dead zones because they dont contribute in the
adsorption process. So, adding a specific ratio of (RM) to the bed with a smaller
particle size fills the dead zones between the particles and increases the total specific
surface area of the bed leading an increase in the adsorption capacity and the
operating time.
Increasing the (RM) ratio to 50% caused the operating time to decrease as
compared to 33% ratio, but the bed was still achieving slightly higher operating time
and removal efficiency than the pure (0% ratio) (DWTS) bed. In fact, the (RM) has
higher adsorption capacity and higher porosity than (DWTS). Therefore; increasing
the (RM) ratio to 50% causes an increase in the available adsorption sites and the total
adsorption capacity of the bed, and this leads to a decrease in the operating time.
1.2
1
C/C
0.8
0.6
DWTS
33% RM
0.4
50% RM
0.2
0
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
Time, min.
Figure.9 Experimental breakthrough curves for adsorption of phosphate onto different (RM)
ratios, (C =4 mg/L, pH=4, H=25 cm, Temp=25 C).
6. CONCLUSIONS
The following Conclusions were obtain from this study:
http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/index.asp
18
editor@iaeme.com
Column Study of The Adsorption of Phosphate by Using Drinking Water Treatment Sludge
and Red Mud
REFERENCES
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
[10]
http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/index.asp
19
editor@iaeme.com