Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Student ID 22017787
CriticalEssay
Drawingonscholarlyarticlesandtheoriesdiscussedthroughoutthemodule,
criticallyexamineinhowfarindividualscaninfluenceanorganisationsculture.
EmelineChenYueXin
StudentID22017787
UniversityofReading
BAinManagementandBusiness
PeopleandOrganisation
MM1F11
06March2014
Student ID 22017787
TableofContents
1.Introduction
Pg.3
2.1.OrganizationalStructure
Pg.3
2.2.LeadersInOrganization
Pg.4
2.3.OrganizationCultureInfluencingIndividuals
Pg.6
2.4. FurtherDeterminantsofOrganizationCultureInfluence
Pg.6
2.4.1GeneralandSpecificEvolution
Pg.7
2.4.2TechnologicalSeduction
Pg.8
2.4.3OrganizationEnvironmentandAge
Pg.8
3.Conclusion
Pg.8
Bibliography
Pg.10
Student ID 22017787
1.Introduction
Whatexactlyiscultureinanorganization?Thewordculture,inessence,sumsup
thephrasethatsthewaythingsaredonehere(Martin,2006).Manyindividuals
strugglewiththeconceptoforganizationculturebecauseofthedifficultyindefining
it. Schein (2004: 17) defines organization culture as a pattern of shared basic
assumptions that was learned by a group as it solved its problems of external
adaptationandinternalintegration.Thesesharedassumptionsworkwellenoughto
be deemed effective and hence, are taught to new members as the right way to
perceive,thinkandreactinviewofthoseproblems.Hefurtherdeemsorganization
cultureasanimportantcomponentinthecurrentdayandage.Increasedglobalization,
competition,mergers,acquisitions,alliancesandvariousotherfactorshavecreateda
needforindividualstoformaconsistentsetofmentalassumptionsthatwilldefine
proper behavioral norms to act on in the organization. This in turn, will greatly
improveorganizationeffectivenessandallowforconstantimprovements.
Thecommonquestionraisedisthepossibilitytocoercealargegroupofindividualsto
adoptthesamebeliefsandsharedassumptions.Ashkenas(2011)understandsthat
culture is not a goal to be mandated, but the outcome of a collective set of
behaviors.Leadersandmanagersinanorganizationhavetheabilitytoinfluencethis
setofbehaviorsandbydoingso,essentiallyformthecultureoftheorganization.This
essay explores the limits that individuals, especially leaders, can influence
organizationcultureandhowinturn,culturecaninfluenceindividuals.Itwillfurther
discusstheotherdeterminantsthatplayapartinshapingorganizationculture.
2.1OrganizationalStructure
The structure of an organization culture is made up of many different variables.
Needle(2004)suggeststhatitcanbeattributedtomanyfactorssuchashistory,
product,market,technology,andstrategy,typeofemployees,managementstyle,and
nationalculturesandsoon. LionelStapley(1996)believesthattheindividualsin
theorganizationinherentlymakeupitsculture.Accordingtohim,itisapsycho
socialprocessthatdevelopsoutoftheinterrelatednessofthemembersofagroupor
Student ID 22017787
organizationwiththegroupororganizationalholdingtheenvironment.Heattributes
cultureformationtoagroupofindividualsadoptingthesamesetofvalues,normsand
beliefsthatshapetheirinterpretativeschemesandareinevitablypassedontoany
newly,employedindividual.Fromasocialpsychologicalperspective,KatzandKahn
(1966)defineanorganizationasasocialsystemthatcoordinatespeoplesbehavior
by means of group roles, norms and values. When a group of organizational
memberssharethesameroles,normsandvalues,thiscreatesaculture.
2.2LeadersinOrganizations
Schien(2004)claimsthatleaderspioneerthecreationofanorganizationsculture.
Oncethiscultureexists,theysetthestandardsforfutureleadersandalsodetermine
whowillorwillnotbeone.Asorganizationsevolveandgrow,sodoesitsculture.
Theroleoftheleaderissaidtomanagethedifferentculturechangemechanismsat
the different stages of organization evolution. Likewise, Head Start Corporation
(1997)believesthatleadersaretheinfluentialdrivingforceinthecultureandthat
they play key roles in ensuring that their programs' culture supports good
relationships. It is important that this leader is able to tell a functional from a
dysfunctionalcultureaswellasstrategicallymanagechangeandculturalevolution.
AccordingtoStapley(1996),leadershavetobecarefulwhilstmakingmajorchanges
onthecultureastheymaybringaboutanegativeeffectiveinstead.
Nordstorm,forexample,takesonanegalitariancultureapproachwhereitsleaders
haveverysuccessfullymanageditsorganization.Ithasbeenthrivingforthepast110
years on the simple principle, use good judgment in all situations. It does not
requiretellingitsemployeeswhattodoandyetholdsagoodreputationforexcellent
service.OthersuchsuccessfulegalitariancompaniesareGoogle,NetflixandNike
(Worley&LawlerIII,2011).
Bass(1998)givesanexampleusingbothtransactionalandtransformationalleaders.
Transactionalleadersaresaidtoworkwithintheirorganizationalculturesfollowing
existingrules,procedures,andnorms.Transformationalleadersontheotherhand,
Student ID 22017787
changetheculturebyfirstunderstandingitandsubsequentlyreadjustingitwithanew
vision of shared assumptions, values and norms. One of the characteristic of a
transformationalleaderasdenotedbyAvoilio,WaldmanandWammarion(1991)is
theabilitytoinfluence.Theyaresaidtoholdboundlessenergy,persistenceandare
veryintunedtotheneedsofothers.Contrastingly,transactionalleadersworkwithin
theexistingculture,framingtheirdecisionsandactionbasedontheoperativenorms
andprocedures(Avoilio,WaldmanandWammarion,1991).Hence,theextentin
whichanindividualisabletoinfluenceanorganizationsculturemightbehighly
dependentonhisorherpersonality.Aleaderwhoishighlyinfluentialandisableto
garnertherespectoftheirsubordinateswilleasilybeabletointroduceasetofbeliefs,
norms and values that will be adopted almost immediately and hence, forming a
culture.
In a differential view, Schein (2004) does not believe that the primary act of
leadershipautomaticallyproducesculture.Instead,hefeelsthatitcreatescompliance
amongstfollowerstoobeyauthority.Ifaleadersactionresultsinsuccess,their
beliefsandvalueswillbereinforcedandcometoberecognizedassharedamongst
thegroupofsubordinates.Whatwasoncetheleadersindividualbeliefhasgrownto
becomeasharedbelief.Inhiswords,themomentasetofsharedassumptionshas
beenadoptedcollectively,itdeterminesmuchofthegroupsbehaviorandtherules
andnormsaretaughttonewcomersinasocializationprocessthatisitselfareflection
ofculture(Schein,2004:22).
LookingatMilgramsObedienceStudies(1961)insupportofScheinstheory,itis
learntthatpeopletendtoobeyorderswithoutthought,especiallyifissuedtheywere
byanauthoritativefigure.Itiseasierforindividualstobepartofagroupthantostand
outalone.Asch(1951)discoveredthroughexperimentsthatindividualsareinclined
toagreeandconformtothemajorityofthegroupevenifitgoesagainsthisorherset
ofvaluesandbeliefs.Thisisduetothefearofsocialdisapproval,lonelinessand
anxiety. Hence, we can see how the easily one individual can influence another,
especiallyinanorganizationwhenapprovalisconstantlysoughtafter.
Student ID 22017787
Withthesedefinitions,itisrightfullyassumedthattheindividualsthatmakeupan
organizationdoplayarelativelylargepartininfluencingitsculture.
2.3OrganizationCultureInfluencingIndividuals
However,whilstindividualsaresaidtolargelyinfluenceorganizationsculture,in
turn, organization culture can also influence the individuals. It affects the way
individualsmakecertaindecisionsandreacttoopportunitiesandthreats.In2002,a
CorporateLeadershipCouncilstudyfoundculturaltraitssuchasrisktaking,internal
communications, and flexibility are some of the most important drivers of
performanceandcanimpactindividualperformance. Cultureis firstlydeveloped
understrongleadershipbutislaterabletoaffectthedevelopmentoftheleaders.
Stapley(1996)hasevidencedthatpositiveworkculturecanhelpsupporttheself
esteemamongstthemembersaswellastheirsenseofrealitywithothers.Hefurther
adds that, members of a group, organization, or society will produce forms of
behavior that will be psychologically advantageous to them under the conditions
imposedbytheenvironment.Similarly,Likert(1961)suggestspositiveorganization
culturecoupledwithconstructiveemployeefocusedmanagementpracticesarelikely
to encourage hard work amongst employees, resulting in great organizational
effectiveness.
Thestateofthecultureisalsoabletoinfluencetheorganizationsrateofgrowth,
successandthewayorganizationmembersthinkandfeel.Inotherwords,culturecan
make or break an organization if not implemented rightfully. In 2003, Harvard
BusinessSchooldidastudyandreportedtheimportanceanorganizationculturehad
on its longterm economic performance. The study looked at 160 management
practicesacross160organizationsandfoundthatculturecanenhanceperformance
or prove to be detrimental to performance. Organizations adopting strong
performanceorientated cultures had produced excellent financial growth; one
example being Apple and its proven success over the years (Pulakos, Mueller
Hanson,OLeary&Meyrowitz,2004).
2.4FurtherDeterminantsofOrganizationCultureInfluence
Student ID 22017787
Wefurtherexplorethedifferentdeterminantsthatinfluenceanorganizationsculture
apartfromitsindividuals.Scheins1992studiesattributetwomainreasonsofculture
developmentinorganizationtoexternaladaptationandinternalintegration.External
adaptionreferstoanevolutionaryapproachtoorganizationalcultureandsuggeststhat
itdevelopsandpersistbecausetheyhelpanorganizationtosurviveandflourish
(pg.87).Thesefactorsincludetheorganizationsindustry,externalenvironmentand
technology.Internalintegrationontheotherhand,reflectsonhowsocialstructures
are important for an organization to survive effectively. This is done through
encouragingindividualstopracticeandholdsimilarbeliefs,valuesandassumptions
thatisconsistentwiththatoftheorganizationsculture.Thecompanyshistoryalso
contributestohowacultureisshapedandissaidtobeanimportantaspectofinternal
integration.
Whenanorganizationfirststartsup,itisatitsmostmalleablestagewherethemain
organizationcultureintroducedstemsfromitsfoundersandtheirassumptions.Thisis
also the stage where leaders are able to initiate culture change or introduce new
cultures.Leaderscandothisthroughtheattentiontheypaytoindividuals,howthey
createorganizationalstructures,processesandhowportraythemselvesasrolemodels
(Schein, 2004: 291). However, if the organizations culture had been originally
stabilizedbecauseofitslonghistoryofsuccess,itisrelativelydifficultforleadersto
influenceandmanipulatechange.
2.4.1GeneralandSpecificEvolution
Anotherinfluentialdeterminantwouldbethe2basicprocessesofgeneralandspecific
evolution(SahlinsandService,1960).Generalevolutioninvolves diversification,
growing complexity, higher levels of differentiation and integration, and creative
synthesesintonewandhigherlevelforms.Thismodelbelievesthatevolutionis
constant and if new leadership occurs, the resulting culture move will be quite
unpredictable(Gersick,1991;TushmanandAnderson,1986).Specificevolutionon
theotherhand,involveschangeincertainpartsoftheorganizationinviewoftheir
particularenvironment.Italsoexplorestheimpactofthesubsequentculturaldiversity
Student ID 22017787
on the core culture. From this mechanism, different industries cultivate different
culturesandhence,enablesubgroupstobuilddifferentsubcultures.Forexample,a
technologycompanywillbemorelikelytodevelopR&Dskillsascomparedtoafood
and beverage company. As this differentiation occurs and subcultures develop, it
influencestheopportunityformajorculturechangestotakeplace.Dickson,Aditya
andChhokar(2000)concurswiththisviewbysaying,Thenatureoftheindustry
influencesorganizationalculturethroughtheconstraintsitplacesonthebehaviorof
allpersonsintheorganization.
2.4.2TechnologicalSeduction
Technologicalseductionisalsosaidtobeanotherfactorthatinfluencesorganization
culture (Schein, 2004: 304). When new technology is introduced be it subtly,
cumulativelyorunintentionallyitinfluencesandchangesculturalassumptions.Itis
abletoseduceorganizationmembersintonewbehavior,whichwill,inturn,require
themtoreexaminetheirpresentassumptionsandpossiblyadoptnewvalues,beliefs
andassumptions(Schein,2004:304).AnexamplewecanuseisBlakesManagerial
Grid(1964),whichexplorestwodistinctleadershipstylesonethatsconcernwith
productionandonethatsconcernwithpeople.Manycompanieshaveintroducednew
social technology as part of development programs in hopes of creating shared
assumptions amongstits members.The introductionofthis social technology can
influencethewayaleaderbehavesandinherentlyaffectthesharedassumptionsofhis
orhersubordinates.OneexamplewouldbetheYellowPagesGroupinCanadathat
invested in a new social intranet platform in a bid to centralize communication
amongst the different departments and individuals. It was proven to be very
successfulandhasencouragedcommunicationamongstdifferentgroups(Ashenden,
2013).
2.4.3OrganizationEnvironmentandAge
Otherelementsofculturalinfluencewouldbetheorganizationsenvironmentand
age.Successissaidtostronglyholdsharedassumptionsandhence,createsapositive
Student ID 22017787
Student ID 22017787
Bibliography
Asch, S.E. 1951. Effects of group pressure on the modification and distortion of
judgments. Pittsburgh: Carnegie Press.
Ashkenas, R. 2011. You Can't Dictate Culture but You Can Influence It.
[online] Available at: http://blogs.hbr.org/2011/06/you-cant-dictate-culture-but-y/
[Accessed: 1 Mar 2014].
Avolio, B. J., Waldman, D. A., & Yammarino, F. J. 1991. Leading in the 1990s:
The four I's of transformational leadership. Journal of European industrial
training, 15(4).
Blake, R.; Mouton, J. 1964. The Managerial Grid: The Key to Leadership
Excellence. Houston: Gulf Publishing Co.
Katz D & Kahn R L. 1966. The social psychology of organizations. New York:
Wiley
10
Student ID 22017787
Sahlins, M., Service, E. R. and Harding, T. G. 1960. Evolution and culture. Ann
Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Bass Publishers.
Stapley, L. F. 2006. Individuals, groups, and organizations beneath the surface.
London: Karnac Books.
11
Student ID 22017787
Worley, C. G. and Lawler III, E. E. 2011. Bring on the Egalitarian Workplace BusinessWeek. [online] Available at:
http://www.businessweek.com/debateroom/archives/2011/09/bring_on_the_egalit
arian_workplace.html [Accessed: 1 Mar 2014].
12