Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 14

Clinical Review & Education

Review

Medical Therapies for Adult Chronic Sinusitis


A Systematic Review
Luke Rudmik, MD, MSc; Zachary M. Soler, MD, MSc

IMPORTANCE Chronic sinusitis is a common inflammatory condition defined by persistent


symptomatic inflammation of the sinonasal cavities lasting longer than 3 months. It accounts
for 1% to 2% of total physician encounters and is associated with large health care
expenditures. Appropriate use of medical therapies for chronic sinusitis is necessary to
optimize patient quality of life (QOL) and daily functioning and minimize the risk of acute
inflammatory exacerbations.
OBJECTIVE To summarize the highest-quality evidence on medical therapies for adult chronic
sinusitis and provide an evidence-based approach to assist in optimizing patient care.

Author Audio Interview at


jama.com
JAMA Patient Page page 964
Supplemental content at
jama.com
CME Quiz at
jamanetworkcme.com and
CME Questions page 944

EVIDENCE REVIEW A systematic review searched Ovid MEDLINE (1947-January 30, 2015),
EMBASE, and Cochrane Databases. The search was limited to randomized clinical trials
(RCTs), systematic reviews, and meta-analyses. Evidence was categorized into maintenance
and intermittent or rescue therapies and reported based on the presence or absence of nasal
polyps.
FINDINGS Twenty-nine studies met inclusion criteria: 12 meta-analyses (>60 RCTs), 13
systematic reviews, and 4 RCTs that were not included in any of the meta-analyses. Saline
irrigation improved symptom scores compared with no treatment (standardized mean
difference [SMD], 1.42 [95% CI, 1.01 to 1.84]; a positive SMD indicates improvement). Topical
corticosteroid therapy improved overall symptom scores (SMD, 0.46 [95% CI, 0.65 to
0.27]; a negative SMD indicates improvement), improved polyp scores (SMD, 0.73 [95%
CI, 1.0 to 0.46]; a negative SMD indicates improvement), and reduced polyp recurrence
after surgery (relative risk, 0.59 [95% CI, 0.45 to 0.79]). Systemic corticosteroids and oral
doxycycline (both for 3 weeks) reduced polyp size compared with placebo for 3 months after
treatment (P < .001). Leukotriene antagonists improved nasal symptoms compared with
placebo in patients with nasal polyps (P < .01). Macrolide antibiotic for 3 months was
associated with improved QOL at a single time point (24 weeks after therapy) compared with
placebo for patients without polyps (SMD, 0.43 [95% CI, 0.82 to 0.05]).
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Evidence supports daily high-volume saline irrigation with
topical corticosteroid therapy as a first-line therapy for chronic sinusitis. A short course of
systemic corticosteroids (1-3 weeks), short course of doxycycline (3 weeks), or a leukotriene
antagonist may be considered in patients with nasal polyps. A prolonged course (3 months)
of macrolide antibiotic may be considered for patients without polyps.

Author Affiliations: Department of


Surgery, Division of Otolaryngology
Head and Neck Surgery, University of
Calgary, Calgary, Alberta (Rudmik);
Department of Otolaryngology
Head and Neck Surgery, Division of
Rhinology and Sinus Surgery, Medical
University of South Carolina,
Charleston (Soler).
Corresponding Author: Luke
Rudmik, MD, MSc, Department of
Surgery, Division of Otolaryngology
Head and Neck Surgery, Richmond
Road Diagnostic and Treatment
Centre, University of Calgary,
1820 Richmond Rd SW,
Calgary, AB, Canada, T2T 5C7
(lukerudmik@gmail.com).

JAMA. 2015;314(9):926-939. doi:10.1001/jama.2015.7544


926

Section Editors: Edward Livingston,


MD, Deputy Editor, and Mary McGrae
McDermott, MD, Senior Editor.
(Reprinted) jama.com

Copyright 2015 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.

Downloaded From: http://jama.jamanetwork.com/ by a Universidad Autonoma de Baja California User on 09/02/2015

Medical Therapies for Adult Chronic Sinusitis

hronic sinusitis, or chronic rhinosinusitis, is an inflammatory condition defined by symptomatic inflammation of the
paranasal sinuses lasting longer than 3 months (Box 1).1-3
Common presenting symptoms include nasal obstruction, facial pressure or fullness, nasal discharge (anterior or posterior), and olfactory
loss (Table 1).4-7 Furthermore, chronic sinusitis is associated with reductions in patient quality of
IL-5 interleukin 5
life (QOL),8 sleep quality,9
and daily productivity.10 It is
QOL quality of life
a common yet underrecogRCT randomized clinical trial
nized chronic inflammatory
disease affecting approximately 3% to 7% of the population11,12 and
accounting for 1% to 2% of total physician visits.13,14 Health care expenditures related to chronic sinusitis exceed $9 billion per year with
societal costs exceeding $13 billion per year.15
Although previously thought to be entirely infectious in etiology, chronic sinusitis is now recognized as an inflammatory disease
of the upper airways analogous to asthma in the lower airways.16,17
The etiology is multifactorial16,18 and includes bacterial superantigens, epithelial cell defects, bacterial biofilms, T helper 1 and 2 inflammation, tissue remodeling19 (increased fibrosis of sinonasal mucosa), and genetic variations in human leukocyte antigen haplotypes
and bitter-taste receptors. For example, healthy sinonasal-ciliated
epithelial cells express bitter-taste receptors, which are stimulated
by bacterial products and activate an innate host immune response to remove and kill bacteria by locally releasing nitric oxide.20,21
Genetic variations in bitter-taste receptors have been associated with
refractory chronic sinusitis and may represent a novel future therapeutic target.22,23
Similar to asthma, current research focuses on categorizing
chronic sinusitis into chronic sinusitis endotypes,24 which are disease classifications defined by distinct clinical features, pathophysiologic molecular mechanisms, and treatment responses.25,26 However, validated chronic sinusitis endotypes have not been defined.
Therefore, chronic sinusitis is currently classified based on the presence or absence of nasal polyps.
Medical treatments for chronic sinusitis reduce mucosal inflammation, remove mucus, and modulate environmental triggers
(Figure 1).30 This systematic review identifies the most effective
treatments for the medical management of adult chronic sinusitis
and presents the evidence supporting each therapeutic option.

Methods
Ovid MEDLINE (1947-January 30, 2015), EMBASE, the Cochrane Central register of Controlled Trials, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were searched using the terms: chronic, *sinusitis
(using * as an unlimited truncation strategy to capture all variations
of sinusitis). The results were combined with the following chronic
sinusitis medical therapy terms: saline, antibiotic, antimicrobial, corticosteroid, steroid, antifungal, leukotriene receptor antagonist, antihistamine, immunotherapy, omalizumab, anti-IL5, macrolide. The
following search limits were then applied: randomized clinical trials
(RCTs) of humans 18 years or older, systematic reviews, and metaanalyses. Inclusion criteria required that all patients in each study
were considered to have chronic sinusitis, although diagnostic criteria were allowed to vary across individual studies. Studies were exjama.com

Review Clinical Review & Education

cluded if they focused on perioperative medications, acute sinusitis, allergic fungal sinusitis, cystic fibrosis, primary ciliary dyskinesia,
aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease, sarcoidosis, immunodeficiency, or granulomatosis with polyangiitis. Unstructured narrative
reviews were excluded. References from all identified studies were
reviewed for additional relevant articles.
Both authors independently reviewed included studies and assigned a level of evidence31 for each study. When applicable, the
quantitative effect size and confidence interval from metaanalyses and RCTs were reported. The standardized mean difference (SMD) was used to report effect size from a meta-analysis when
studies reported outcomes using different instruments. When improvement was associated with higher scores on the outcome measure, then the SMD would be greater than 0. If improvement was
associated with lower scores on the outcome measure (ie, polyp
scores), then the SMD would be less than 0. An aggregate grade of
evidence (A-C) and recommendation (I-III) for each treatment strategy was assigned using the American Heart Association grading scale
(Box 2).32 Differences in evidence grading were resolved by discussion. The risk of bias for each meta-analysis was quantified using the
Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions.33

Results
Three hundred twenty-eight studies were screened for eligibility.
Twenty-nine studies met inclusion criteria, including 12 metaanalyses (evaluating >60 RCTs), 13 systematic reviews, and 4 individual RCTs that were not included in any of the meta-analyses (eFigure in the Supplement). The evidence for each treatment strategy
is organized into either maintenance or intermittent or rescue
therapies, with the understanding that these designations are not
necessarily mutually exclusive in clinical practice.

Maintenance Medical Therapies for Chronic Sinusitis


Topical Corticosteroids

Corticosteroids reduce sinonasal mucosal inflammation, decrease


vascular permeability, and reduce glycoprotein release from submucosal glands (ie, thin mucus) (eTable 1 in the Supplement). Benefits associated with this therapy have the strongest level of evidence with 6 meta-analyses quantifying the evidence from more
than 40 RCTs (Table 2). 34-39 Three meta-analyses (>3624
patients)34,37,38 evaluated patients with nasal polyps and demonstrated an association with improvements in overall symptoms
scores, polyp size, and recurrence rate after sinus surgery. RCTs included in the largest meta-analysis by Kalish et al38 were of high quality with only 6 of 40 trials having a high risk of bias (eTable 2 in the
Supplement). The degree of reduction in polyp size is associated directly with the degree of improvement in QOL.45
Two meta-analyses (>657 patients)35,36 evaluated patients without nasal polyps and determined that topical corticosteroids were associated with improved overall symptom scores and greater proportion of symptom responders. Quality assessment demonstrated a low
risk of bias for blinding; however, there was a high risk of bias for group
allocation (ie, topical corticosteroid vs placebo), which indicates a need
for higher-quality trials in patients without polyps.
In summary, an A-I grade and recommendation supports using
topical corticosteroid therapy for chronic sinusitis with and with(Reprinted) JAMA September 1, 2015 Volume 314, Number 9

Copyright 2015 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.

Downloaded From: http://jama.jamanetwork.com/ by a Universidad Autonoma de Baja California User on 09/02/2015

927

Clinical Review & Education Review

Medical Therapies for Adult Chronic Sinusitis

Box 1. Consensus-Based Diagnostic Criteria for Chronic Sinusitis


2 of the Following 4 Symptoms Lasting for >3 Months (PODS)a

Pressure/pain (facial)
Obstruction (nasal)
Discharge (nasal)anterior or posterior
Smell reduced
Symptom Criteria Supported by Demonstrating at Least 1 of the
Following 3 Objective Signs of Inflammation

Presenting Symptom

Frequency of Presenting
Symptom, %

Sinonasal-specific
Nasal obstruction/congestion

81-95

Nasal discharge

81-93

Facial pressure/fullness

70-85

Reduced sense of smell

66-84

Other

Nasal polyps on anterior rhinoscopy or nasal endoscopy


Edema or purulence within middle meatus
CT scan of the paranasal sinuses demonstrating inflammation

Fatigue

83-92

Headache

73-83

Difficulty sleeping

62-74

CT indicates computed tomography.

Toothache

30-67

Ear pain/fullness

39-56

One of the 2 symptoms must be either obstruction or discharge.

Source: US, European, and Canadian guidelines on chronic sinusitis1-3

out nasal polyposis. Although early evidence suggests that highvolume corticosteroid irrigations (ie, techniques that involve delivering >100 mL of solution into the nasal cavity46) (eg, budesonide
irrigations47) are more effective than low-volume corticosteroid spray
techniques (ie, meter-dosed spray, atomized, or nebulized
solutions),46 clinical trials are required before a recommendation on
optimal delivery method can be provided. Doses, durations, and potential adverse effects of available medical therapies are reported
in Table 3.

Saline Irrigations
Sinonasal saline irrigations assist in removing mucus and possible environmental triggers and assist in restoring normal mucociliary clearance. Outcomes from 2 systematic reviews 41,42 and 1 metaanalysis (399 patients)40 support an association between the use
of sinonasal saline irrigations and improved symptom scores
(Table 2). However, when saline irrigation was the only treatment,
it was associated with less improvement when directly compared
with topical corticosteroid therapy.
In summary, an A-I grade and recommendation supports using
sinonasal saline irrigation as an adjunctive therapy to intranasal corticosteroids for patients with and without nasal polyps. Isotonic and
hypertonic saline irrigations provide similar symptom improvement. High-volume (>100 mL) saline irrigation is superior to lowvolume nasal saline spray techniques.46,48

Leukotriene Pathway Antagonists


Leukotriene pathway antagonists block leukotrienes D4, C4, and E4
from binding the cysteinyl leukotriene receptors located in respiratory mucosa or block the production of leukotrienes from arachidonic acid by inhibiting 5-lipoxygenase. These effects can reduce eosinophil recruitment, vasodilation, and mucus secretion. Five
RCTs49-53 evaluated an oral leukotriene antagonist, montelukast
(10 mg once daily), in patients with nasal polyposis (Table 2).49-53
Only 2 RCTs met the high-quality requirements for quantitative
meta-analysis43 (174 patients). Overall, montelukast may improve
symptoms compared with placebo; however, there was no difference between oral montelukast and topical corticosteroid therapy.
No additional improvement was seen when montelukast was added
to existing topical corticosteroid therapy.
928

Table 1. Presenting Symptoms of Chronic Sinusitis

Data sources: Bhattacharyya,4,5 Soler et al,6 and Dietz de Loos et al.7

In summary, an A-II grade and recommendation supports using


a leukotriene antagonist (montelukast) in patients with nasal polyps.
No evidence grade is assigned for use of leukotriene antagonists in
patients without nasal polyps.

Antihistamines and Allergy Immunotherapy


Antihistamines and allergy immunotherapy reduce an allergen induced IgE-mediated host response, which decreases vascular permeability, vasodilation, and nasal secretions. An estimated 20% to
60% of chronic sinusitis patients have allergic rhinitis, with the highest prevalence in those with nasal polyposis.54,55 Despite this association, it remains unclear whether allergy plays a causal role in
chronic sinusitis and whether treating allergic rhinitis improves
chronic sinusitis-specific outcomes.56 One systematic review identified 6 case series evaluating the association of allergy immunotherapy on sinusitis-specific outcomes and reported improved
allergy-specific symptoms but no consistent improvement in sinusspecific symptoms (Table 2).44
In summary, a C-II grade and recommendation is designated to
allergy immunotherapy for the specific management of chronic sinusitis. No grade of evidence is provided for the use of oral antihistamines during specific management of chronic sinusitis. Evidence
supports antihistamines and allergy immunotherapy for managing
concurrent allergic rhinitis.57

Intermittent or Rescue Medical Therapies


for Chronic Sinusitis
Systemic Corticosteroids

Patients commonly present with severe nasal polyposis or acute inflammatory exacerbations requiring intermittent or rescue systemic corticosteroid to treat acute mucosal inflammation.30 Three
systematic reviews evaluated oral corticosteroids for nasal polyposis (Table 4).58-60 Oral corticosteroids were associated with improved symptoms, QOL, and reduced polyp size compared with placebo in all 5 RCTs. However, the RCTs were of low to moderate quality,
short duration (2-3 weeks), and limited follow-up (2 weeks-6
months). Improvements were not sustained for more than 3 months
in the absence of maintenance topical corticosteroid therapy.45,73
No RCTs evaluated oral corticosteroids for chronic sinusitis without nasal polyps. The highest level of evidence for patients without

JAMA September 1, 2015 Volume 314, Number 9 (Reprinted)

Copyright 2015 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.

Downloaded From: http://jama.jamanetwork.com/ by a Universidad Autonoma de Baja California User on 09/02/2015

jama.com

Medical Therapies for Adult Chronic Sinusitis

Review Clinical Review & Education

Figure 1. Proposed Mechanisms of Action for Chronic Sinusitis Medical Therapies

Respiratory pathogens

Nonmacrolide antibiotics

Macrolides

Clears respiratory
pathogens and allergens
Increases ciliary clearance

Respiratory
pathogen

Increase ciliary
clearance

NASAL MUCOSA

Cell membrane
phospholipid
SUBEPITHELIAL
MAST CELL

RESPIRATORY
EPITHELIAL CELL

Antigenpresenting
cell

Epithelial cell
Phospholipase A2

Corticosteroids
Macrolides

Activation of
NF-B pathway

Environmental
allergens

Saline irrigation

Treat bacterial infection

Corticosteroids

Inhibit NF-B
pathway

Arachidonic acid

Inhibit arachidonic
acid synthesis

Antigenpresenting
cell
TH 2-cell
activation

NF-B
5-LO
Leukotriene
synthesis
5-LO inhibitors
NF-B

Block leukotriene
synthesis

Release of
inflammatory
mediators

Release of
inflammatory
mediators
Leukotrienes

TGF-

Block binding to
TGF- receptor

Neutrophil
activation

Fibroblast activation and


submucosal collagen
deposition with fibrosis

TNF-
Doxycycline
Blocks IL-6,
IL-8, TNF-

IL-4
IL-13

Eosinophil
migration and
activation

B-cell
activation

Binds free IL-5

IL-6
IL-8

GM-CSF

IL-5

Mepolizumab

IL-2

Macrolides

TH2 cell

Recruitment of
inflammatory
cells

Leukotriene receptor
antagonists

Block cysteinyl
leukotriene receptor
binding

B cell
Eosinophil

Synthesis and
release of IgE

Neutrophil
Eosinophil

Monocyte
Neutrophil

Macrolides
Inhibit neutrophil
migration
Promote neutrophil
apoptosis

Neutrophil

IL-8
Leukotriene B4

IgE

Neutrophil migration
Release of proteases
and superoxides

Neutrophil

Eosinophil

Cysteinyl leukotriene
receptors 1 and 2

Omalizumab
Binds free IgE
Histamine release
and mast cell
migration

Antihistamine
Blocks histamine
release from
mast cells

Apoptotic
neutrophil

Mast cell
Neutrophil

Histamine
Leukotrienes
Other cytokines

GM-CSF indicates granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor; IL, interleukin; LO, lipoxygenase; NF-B, nuclear factor enhancer of B cells;
TGF, transforming growth factor; TH2, T helper 2; TNF, tumor necrosis factor.

jama.com

(Reprinted) JAMA September 1, 2015 Volume 314, Number 9

Copyright 2015 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.

Downloaded From: http://jama.jamanetwork.com/ by a Universidad Autonoma de Baja California User on 09/02/2015

929

Clinical Review & Education Review

Medical Therapies for Adult Chronic Sinusitis

Box 2. American Heart Association Grade of Evidence and


Recommendation Grading Scale
A-I: conditions for which there is evidence and/or general agreement that a given treatment is useful and effective; data derived
from multiple randomized clinical trials (RCTs)
A-II: conditions for which there is conflicting evidence and/or
divergence of opinion about the usefulness/efficacy of a
treatment; data derived from multiple randomized studies
A-III: conditions for which there is evidence and/or general agreement that the treatment is not useful/effective and in some cases
may be harmful; data derived from multiple RCTs
B-I: conditions for which there is evidence and/or general agreement that a given treatment is useful and effective; data derived
from a single randomized trial or nonrandomized studies
B-II: conditions for which there is conflicting evidence and/or
divergence of opinion about the usefulness/efficacy of a
procedure/treatment, data derived from a single randomized trial
or nonrandomized studies
B-III: conditions for which there is evidence and/or general agreement that the treatment is not useful/effective and in some cases
may be harmful; data derived from a single randomized trial or
nonrandomized studies
C-I: conditions for which there is evidence and/or general agreement that a given procedure or treatment is useful and effective;
consensus opinion of experts
C-II: conditions for which there is conflicting evidence and/or
divergence of opinion about usefulness/efficacy of a procedure or
treatment; consensus opinion of experts
C-III: conditions for which there is evidence and/or general agreement that the procedure/treatment is not useful/effective and in
some cases may be harmful; consensus opinion of experts
Source: American Heart Association32

polyps comes from prospective case series without control groups


and heterogeneous concurrent medical therapy protocols. These
studies report that oral corticosteroids are associated with improved olfactory and symptom scores.74-77
In summary, an A-I grade and recommendation supports the use
of intermittent short-course (1-3 weeks) oral corticosteroids for symptomatic nasal polyposis. A C-II grade and recommendation supports the use of oral corticosteroids for chronic sinusitis without nasal polyps. Because of the adverse effects associated with oral
corticosteroids,78 patients and physicians should participate in an
open discussion about the risks, benefits, and alternative treatments to facilitate a shared decision-making process.

Short-term Oral Antibiotics (Nonmacrolide)


Short-term courses of antibiotics are intended to eradicate active
infection through several potential mechanisms such as inhibiting
bacterial cell wall formation, inhibiting bacterial folate synthesis, and
promoting bacterial DNA fragmentation (eTable 1 in the Supplement). One systematic review evaluated short-term oral antibiotics for chronic sinusitis61 (Table 4). Three RCTs compared 2 different antibiotics (cefotiam vs cefixime79; amoxicillin/clavulanate vs
ciprofloxacin80; and cefaclor vs amoxicillin81) for 3 weeks or less without a placebo group and showed no difference between antibiotics. Heterogeneity between studies precluded quantitative meta930

analysis. One RCT evaluated 200 mg of doxycycline once, followed


by 100 mg daily for 20 days (n = 14) compared with methylprednisolone (n = 14) and placebo (n = 19) for nasal polyposis.73 Doxycycline was associated with an improved polyp score 12 weeks after discontinuing treatment compared with placebo (P = .015).
Methylprednisolone was associated with a larger improvement in
polyp score at 2 weeks compared with doxycycline and placebo;
however, there was no difference in polyp score between methylprednisolone and doxycycline 12 weeks after discontinuing the treatment. This suggests that doxycycline does not provide as large of
an early improvement but provides a similar longer-term improvement in polyp reduction. The only symptom that improved in the
doxycycline group was postnasal drainage at 2 weeks.
In summary, a B-I grade and recommendation supports a shortcourse of doxycycline (200 mg once then 100 mg daily for 20 days)
for nasal polyposis. An A-II recommendation supports the use of
short-course oral antibiotics (<3 weeks) for chronic sinusitis without nasal polyps; however, they are probably only relevant when purulence is present on examination.2

Long-term Macrolide Therapy


Analogous to their use in lower airway disease,82 extended courses
of low-dose macrolide antibiotics have been evaluated as therapy
of chronic sinusitis.83 The direct antibacterial effects, ability to improve cilia function, and immunomodulatory properties of macrolides may improve clinical outcomes (Figure 1 and eTable 1 in the
Supplement).27,84
Two systemic reviews61,62 and 1 meta-analysis63 evaluated prolonged macrolide therapy for chronic sinusitis (Table 4). Three
months of macrolide antibiotic were associated with improved symptom response, QOL, and mucociliary clearance compared with placebo for patients without nasal polyps in a single RCT.85 Although
the meta-analysis demonstrated improvement in QOL at a single time
point after starting macrolide therapy (24 weeks), the pooled RCTs
contained a heterogeneous patient population (patients with and
without nasal polyps) and the clinical significance of the improvement was questionable. Furthermore, the QOL improvement was
not sustained 12 weeks after completing the macrolide therapy. Although not statistically significant, there may be an association in
sustained QOL improvement in patients with low serum IgE
(<200 g/L; to convert to mg/L, multiply by 0.001) (P = .06). The
only RCT that included patients with nasal polyposis showed no difference between macrolide therapy and placebo.86
In summary, an A-II grade and recommendation is designated
for long-term use (>12 weeks) of macrolide therapy in patients without nasal polyps. Given the negative results from 1 RCT, a B-III grade
and recommendation against use is designated to long-term macrolide therapy for patients with nasal polyps.

Anti-IgE Therapy
Anti-IgE therapy involves delivery of a recombinant DNA-derived humanized IgG monoclonal antibody that binds free IgE and inhibits
binding to mast cell and basophil receptors.87 However, the influence of IgE-mediated inflammation on the underlying pathophysiology of chronic sinusitis is unclear.88
Two RCTs64,65 that evaluated anti-IgE monoclonal antibody included patients with serum IgE levels from 15 kU/mL through
700 kU/mL and compared omalizumab (0.016 mg/kg per IU total

JAMA September 1, 2015 Volume 314, Number 9 (Reprinted)

Copyright 2015 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.

Downloaded From: http://jama.jamanetwork.com/ by a Universidad Autonoma de Baja California User on 09/02/2015

jama.com

Medical Therapies for Adult Chronic Sinusitis

Review Clinical Review & Education

Thus, this review placed a B-III grade of evidence and recommendation against the use of long-term macrolide for nasal polyposis. This is
in contrast to a C grade of evidence and recommendation for its use in
patients with nasal polyps by the European and British guidelines.
This review has limitations. First, the quality of included studies used to generate evidence-based conclusions was limited. Several medical therapies lacked level 1 evidence and several RCTs contained moderate to high risk of bias (eTable 2 in the Supplement).
Second, some studies used different diagnostic criteria for chronic
sinusitis and included mixed cohorts of sinusitis patients (eg, with
and without nasal polyps), limiting the ability to make specific conclusions. Third, some of the meta-analyses included the same RCTs
(ie, a RCT may be included in more than 1 meta-analysis).

Evidence-Based Medical Therapy Approach: Chronic


Sinusitis With Nasal Polyposis
An evidence-based but nonvalidated approach for the medical management of patients with nasal polyposis is provided in Figure 2. The
goal is to reduce the size or eliminate nasal polyps because they can
obstruct the nasal cavity and impair the sense of smell, restrict the
ability to breathe through the nose, and obstruct physiologic drainage of the sinuses.45,96 Patients with symptomatic nasal polyps after initial medical therapy (ie, topical corticosteroid with saline irrigations) may warrant a short-course of oral corticosteroids. Because
the expected benefit of systemic corticosteroids is relatively brief
(<3 months), it should be emphasized that this treatment ought to
be combined with maintenance topical corticosteroid therapy.
Systemic antibiotic therapy is not recommended for managing
nasal polyposis. However, during periods of acute exacerbation with
superimposed infection a broad-spectrum antibiotic may be necessary to help patients return to their baseline health state. Alternatively, an endoscopic-directed sinus swab of purulent secretions
within the middle meatus may guide a culture-directed course of oral
antibiotics. Due to the demonstrated effects on reducing the size
of nasal polyps, a short-course of doxycycline (200 mg once followed by 100 mg for 21 days) or a leukotriene antagonist may be considered to further reduce polyp burden.
Patients with chronic sinusitis who experience persistent symptomsdespitecomprehensivemedicaltherapymayconsiderendoscopic
sinus surgery. All 4 multidisciplinary practice guidelines recommend
(C-I grade of evidence and recommendation) consideration of endoscopic sinus surgery for select patients with chronic sinusitis who have
persistentsymptomsdespitetrialsofappropriatemedicaltherapy.1,2,95

ARTICLE INFORMATION
Author Contributions: Drs Rudmik and Soler had
full access to all of the data in the study and take
responsibility for the integrity of the data and the
accuracy of the data analysis.
Study concept and design: All authors.
Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: All
authors.
Drafting of the manuscript: All authors.
Critical revision of the manuscript for important
intellectual content: All authors.
Administrative, technical, or material support: All
authors.
Study supervision: Rudmik.
Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Both authors
have completed and submitted the ICMJE Form for

jama.com

Evidence-Based Approach: Medical Therapy for Chronic


Sinusitis Without Nasal Polyps
The initial approach to managing chronic sinusitis without nasal polyps is similar to that of nasal polyposis with several notable differences (Figure 2). First, patients without polyps benefit to a greater degree from prolonged courses of macrolide therapy compared with
patients with nasal polyps. Evidence-based long-term macrolide protocols may require 3 months of clarithromycin 250 to 500 mg once
daily, roxithromycin 150 mg daily, or azithromycin 500 mg once per
week.63,97 Potential adverse effects of prolonged macrolide therapy
should be considered, including rhabdomyolysis98 and prolonged QT
interval with cardiovascular death,99 along with prolonged bleeding
risk and sedation with co-administration with warfarin and benzodiazepines, respectively (Table 3).100,101 The estimated risk of death attributable to macrolide is 1 event per every 4100 prescriptions among
patients with high cardiovascular risk and 1 event per 100 000 among
patients with low cardiovascular risk.99 Second, there is a lack of consistent evidence supporting the routine use of short-course systemic corticosteroids (C-II grade of evidence with recommendation)
in patients without polyps, whereas evidence is stronger in patients
with polyps. Lastly, there is no research evaluating the use of leukotriene antagonists for patients without nasal polyps.

Future Directions
Given the high prevalence and large economic burden of chronic
sinusitis,15 future research should improve the quality of evidence
for individual therapies and validate treatment pathways to optimize the quality of care. Furthermore, the studies included in this
review considered chronic sinusitis as a single clinical entity with subgroups defined only by polyp status. Future research should develop personalized therapies that target precise features of the patients abnormal immune-environment interaction to maximally
improve outcomes.

Conclusion
Evidence supports daily high-volume saline irrigation with topical corticosteroid therapy as a first-line therapy for chronic sinusitis. A short
course of systemic corticosteroids (1-3 weeks), short course of doxycycline (3 weeks), or a leukotriene antagonist may be considered in
patients with nasal polyps. A prolonged course (3 months) of macrolide antibiotic may be considered for patients without polyps.

Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Dr Soler


reports receiving consulting fees from Brainlab and
Olympus and receiving grant support from the
National Institutes of Health and the National
Institute on Deafness and Other Communication
Disorders. No other disclosures were reported.
Additional Contributions: We thank Timothy L.
Smith, MD, MPH (Oregon Health and Science
University), and Rodney J. Schlosser, MD (Medical
University of South Carolina), for their academic
mentorship and support of this project. No one
received compensation for their contribution.
Submissions:We encourage authors to
submit papers for consideration as a Review.
Please contact Edward Livingston, MD,
at Edward.livingston@jamanetwork.org

or Mary McGrae McDermott, MD, at


mdm608@northwestern.edu.
REFERENCES
1. Desrosiers M, Evans GA, Keith PK, et al. Canadian
clinical practice guidelines for acute and chronic
rhinosinusitis. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011;
40(suppl 2):S99-S193.
2. Fokkens WJ, Lund VJ, Mullol J, et al. EPOS 2012:
European position paper on rhinosinusitis and nasal
polyps 2012: a summary for otorhinolaryngologists.
Rhinology. 2012;50(1):1-12.
3. Rosenfeld RM, Piccirillo JF, Chandrasekhar SS,
et al. Clinical practice guideline (update): adult
sinusitis. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015;152(2
suppl):S1-S39.

(Reprinted) JAMA September 1, 2015 Volume 314, Number 9

Copyright 2015 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.

Downloaded From: http://jama.jamanetwork.com/ by a Universidad Autonoma de Baja California User on 09/02/2015

937

Clinical Review & Education Review

Medical Therapies for Adult Chronic Sinusitis

4. Bhattacharyya N. The economic burden and


symptom manifestations of chronic rhinosinusitis.
Am J Rhinol. 2003;17(1):27-32.
5. Bhattacharyya N. Clinical and symptom criteria
for the accurate diagnosis of chronic rhinosinusitis.
Laryngoscope. 2006;116(7 Pt 2)(suppl 110):1-22.
6. Soler ZM, Mace J, Smith TL. Symptom-based
presentation of chronic rhinosinusitis and
symptom-specific outcomes after endoscopic sinus
surgery. Am J Rhinol. 2008;22(3):297-301.
7. Dietz de Loos DA, Hopkins C, Fokkens WJ.
Symptoms in chronic rhinosinusitis with and
without nasal polyps. Laryngoscope. 2013;123(1):5763.
8. Rudmik L, Smith TL. Quality of life in patients
with chronic rhinosinusitis. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep.
2011;11(3):247-252.
9. Alt JA, Smith TL. Chronic rhinosinusitis and
sleep: a contemporary review. Int Forum Allergy
Rhinol. 2013;3(11):941-949.
10. Rudmik L, Smith TL, Schlosser RJ, Hwang PH,
Mace JC, Soler ZM. Productivity costs in patients
with refractory chronic rhinosinusitis. Laryngoscope.
2014;124(9):2007-2012.
11. Halawi AM, Smith SS, Chandra RK. Chronic
rhinosinusitis: epidemiology and cost. Allergy
Asthma Proc. 2013;34(4):328-334.
12. Tan BK, Kern RC, Schleimer RP, Schwartz BS.
Chronic rhinosinusitis: the unrecognized epidemic.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013;188(11):1275-1277.
13. Bhattacharyya N. Incremental health care
utilization and expenditures for chronic
rhinosinusitis in the United States. Ann Otol Rhinol
Laryngol. 2011;120(7):423-427.
14. Mattos JL, Woodard CR, Payne SC. Trends in
common rhinologic illnesses: analysis of US
healthcare surveys 1995-2007. Int Forum Allergy
Rhinol. 2011;1(1):3-12.
15. Smith KA, Orlandi RR, Rudmik L. Cost of adult
chronic rhinosinusitis: a systematic review.
Laryngoscope. 2015;125(7):1547-1556.
16. Van Crombruggen K, Zhang N, Gevaert P,
Tomassen P, Bachert C. Pathogenesis of chronic
rhinosinusitis: inflammation. J Allergy Clin Immunol.
2011;128(4):728-732.
17. Ocampo CJ, Grammer LC. Chronic
rhinosinusitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract.
2013;1(3):205-211; quiz 212-203.
18. Hsu J, Avila PC, Kern RC, Hayes MG, Schleimer
RP, Pinto JM. Genetics of chronic rhinosinusitis:
state of the field and directions forward. J Allergy
Clin Immunol. 2013;131(4):977-993, 993 e971-975.
19. Bassiouni A, Naidoo Y, Wormald PJ. Does
mucosal remodeling in chronic rhinosinusitis result
in irreversible mucosal disease? Laryngoscope.
2012;122(1):225-229.

938

23. Adappa ND, Howland TJ, Palmer JN, et al.


Genetics of the taste receptor T2R38 correlates
with chronic rhinosinusitis necessitating surgical
intervention. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2013;3(3):
184-187.
24. Akdis CA, Bachert C, Cingi C, et al. Endotypes
and phenotypes of chronic rhinosinusitis:
a PRACTALL document of the European Academy
of Allergy and Clinical Immunology and the
American Academy of Allergy, Asthma &
Immunology. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2013;131(6):
1479-1490.
25. Anderson GP. Endotyping asthma: new insights
into key pathogenic mechanisms in a complex,
heterogeneous disease. Lancet. 2008;372(9643):
1107-1119.
26. Ltvall J, Akdis CA, Bacharier LB, et al. Asthma
endotypes: a new approach to classification of
disease entities within the asthma syndrome.
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011;127(2):355-360.
27. Parnham MJ, Erakovic Haber V,
Giamarellos-Bourboulis EJ, Perletti G, Verleden GM,
Vos R. Azithromycin: mechanisms of action and
their relevance for clinical applications. Pharmacol
Ther. 2014;143(2):225-245.
28. van Drunen CM, Reinartz S, Wigman J, Fokkens
WJ. Inflammation in chronic rhinosinusitis and nasal
polyposis. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am. 2009;
29(4):621-629.
29. Yoon BN, Choi NG, Lee HS, Cho KS, Roh HJ.
Induction of interleukin-8 from nasal epithelial cells
during bacterial infection: the role of IL-8 for
neutrophil recruitment in chronic rhinosinusitis.
Mediators Inflamm. 2010;2010:813610.
30. Ocampo CJ, Peters AT. Medical therapy as the
primary modality for the management of chronic
rhinosinusitis. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2013;34(2):132137.
31. Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine.
Levels of evidence. http://www.cebm.net/oxford
-centre-evidence-based-medicine-levels-evidence
-march-2009/. Accessed February 1, 2015.

38. Kalish L, Snidvongs K, Sivasubramaniam R,


Cope D, Harvey RJ. Topical steroids for nasal polyps.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;12:CD006549.
39. Fandio M, Macdonald KI, Lee J, Witterick IJ.
The use of postoperative topical corticosteroids in
chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps:
a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Rhinol
Allergy. 2013;27(5):e146-e157.
40. Harvey R, Hannan SA, Badia L, Scadding G.
Nasal saline irrigations for the symptoms of chronic
rhinosinusitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;
(3):CD006394.
41. Rudmik L, Hoy M, Schlosser RJ, et al. Topical
therapies in the management of chronic
rhinosinusitis: an evidence-based review with
recommendations. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2013;3
(4):281-298.
42. van den Berg JW, de Nier LM, Kaper NM, et al.
Limited evidence: higher efficacy of nasal saline
irrigation over nasal saline spray in chronic
rhinosinusitisan update and reanalysis of the
evidence base. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014;
150(1):16-21.
43. Wentzel JL, Soler ZM, DeYoung K, Nguyen SA,
Lohia S, Schlosser RJ. Leukotriene antagonists in
nasal polyposis: a meta-analysis and systematic
review. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2013;27(6):482-489.
44. DeYoung K, Wentzel JL, Schlosser RJ, Nguyen
SA, Soler ZM. Systematic review of immunotherapy
for chronic rhinosinusitis. Am J Rhinol Allergy.
2014;28(2):145-150.
45. Vaidyanathan S, Barnes M, Williamson P,
Hopkinson P, Donnan PT, Lipworth B. Treatment of
chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis with oral
steroids followed by topical steroids: a randomized
trial. Ann Intern Med. 2011;154(5):293-302.
46. Thomas WW III, Harvey RJ, Rudmik L, Hwang
PH, Schlosser RJ. Distribution of topical agents to
the paranasal sinuses: an evidence-based review
with recommendations. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol.
2013;3(9):691-703.

32. Manual for ACC/AHA Guideline Writing


Committees. Section II: tools and methods for
creating guidelines. http://circ.ahajournals.org/site
/manual/manual_IIstep6.xhtml. Accessed
December 28, 2014.

47. Rudmik L. High volume sinonasal budesonide


irrigations for chronic rhinosinusitis: an update on
the safety and effectiveness. http://omicsgroup.org
/journals/high-volume-sinonasal-budesonide
-irrigations-for-chronic-rhinosinusitis-2167-1052
.1000148.pdf. Accessed December 27, 2014.

33. Higgins JP, Green S. Cochrane Handbook for


Systematic Reviews of Interventions, version 5.1.0.
http://www.cochrane-handbook.org. Accessed May
4, 2015.

48. Pynnonen MA, Mukerji SS, Kim HM, Adams


ME, Terrell JE. Nasal saline for chronic sinonasal
symptoms: a randomized controlled trial. Arch
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007;133(11):1115-1120.

34. Joe SA, Thambi R, Huang J. A systematic


review of the use of intranasal steroids in the
treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis. Otolaryngol
Head Neck Surg. 2008;139(3):340-347.

49. Pauli C, Fintelmann R, Klemens C, et al.


Polyposis nasiimprovement in quality of life by
the influence of leukotriene receptor antagonists
[in German]. Laryngorhinootologie. 2007;86(4):
282-286.

20. Lee RJ, Cohen NA. Taste receptors in innate


immunity. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2015;72(2):217-236.

35. Kalish LH, Arendts G, Sacks R, Craig JC. Topical


steroids in chronic rhinosinusitis without polyps:
a systematic review and meta-analysis. Otolaryngol
Head Neck Surg. 2009;141(6):674-683.

21. Lee RJ, Cohen NA. Role of the bitter taste


receptor T2R38 in upper respiratory infection and
chronic rhinosinusitis. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol.
2015;15(1):14-20.

36. Snidvongs K, Kalish L, Sacks R, Craig JC, Harvey


RJ. Topical steroid for chronic rhinosinusitis without
polyps. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;(8):
CD009274.

22. Adappa ND, Zhang Z, Palmer JN, et al. The


bitter taste receptor T2R38 is an independent risk
factor for chronic rhinosinusitis requiring sinus
surgery. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2014;4(1):3-7.

37. Rudmik L, Schlosser RJ, Smith TL, Soler ZM.


Impact of topical nasal steroid therapy on
symptoms of nasal polyposis: a meta-analysis.
Laryngoscope. 2012;122(7):1431-1437.

50. Schper C, Noga O, Koch B, et al.


Anti-inflammatory properties of montelukast, a
leukotriene receptor antagonist in patients with
asthma and nasal polyposis. J Investig Allergol Clin
Immunol. 2011;21(1):51-58.
51. Stewart RA, Ram B, Hamilton G, Weiner J, Kane
KJ. Montelukast as an adjunct to oral and inhaled
steroid therapy in chronic nasal polyposis.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008;139(5):682-687.
52. Vuralkan E, Saka C, Akin I, et al. Comparison of
montelukast and mometasone furoate in the
prevention of recurrent nasal polyps. Ther Adv
Respir Dis. 2012;6(1):5-10.

JAMA September 1, 2015 Volume 314, Number 9 (Reprinted)

Copyright 2015 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.

Downloaded From: http://jama.jamanetwork.com/ by a Universidad Autonoma de Baja California User on 09/02/2015

jama.com

jama.com

Study Design
(LOEa)

Systematic review
(2a)

Poetker et al,60 2013

Systematic review
(2a)

Meta-analysis (1a)

Soler et al,61 2013

Pynnonen et al,63
2013

RCT (2b)

RCT (2b)

RCT (2b)

RCT (2b)

Pinto et al,64 2010

Gevaert et al,65 2013

Gevaert et al,66 200)

Gevaert et al,67 2011

Immunomodulation

Systematic review
(3a)

Piromchai et al,62
2011

Long-term Antibiotics

Soler et al,61 2013

Systematic review
(2a)

Systematic review
(3a)

Lal and Hwang,59


2011

Short-term Antibiotics

Systematic review
(2a)

Martinez-Devesa and
Patiar,58 2011

Systemic Corticosteroids

Source
NA

Sample Size

Copyright 2015 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.

Downloaded From: http://jama.jamanetwork.com/ by a Universidad Autonoma de Baja California User on 09/02/2015


NA

NA

NA

NA

2 (1b)

2 (1b)

1 (1b)

4 (1b) and
2 (4)

5 (2b), 2 (3b),
and 11 (4)

30 patients

24 patients

24 patients

14 patients

124 patients

NA

NA

NA

NA

1 (3b) and 6 (4) NA

3 (2b)

No. of Studies
(LOEa)

Nasal polyps

Nasal polyps

Nasal polyps

Nasal polyps

no polyps; mixed
polyp groups

Both polyp groups

No polyps

Both polyp groups

Both polyp groups

No polyps

Nasal polyps

Population
Treated

Table 4. Highest-Level Evidence for Intermittent or Rescue Therapies for Chronic Sinusitis

Anti-IL-5 (mepolizumab
750 mg for 2 doses 28 d apart)
vs placebo

Anti-IL-5 (reslizumab 1 or
3 mg/kg single infusion) vs
placebo

Anti-IgE (omalizumab max


375 mg monthly for 4 mo) vs
placebo

Anti-IgE (omalizumab
0.016 mg/kg per IU total serum
IgE/mL monthly for 6 mo) vs
placebo

Oral macrolide vs placebo

Oral macrolide vs placebo

Oral macrolide vs placebo

Oral antibiotic vs placebo; oral


antibiotic vs oral antibiotic

Oral corticosteroid vs placebo

Oral corticosteroids added to


other multimodality treatment
strategies

Oral corticosteroid vs placebo

Study Groups

Polyp score and radiographic

Polyp score, nasal patency,


symptom score, and
inflammatory markers

Polyp score, radiographic,


QOL, symptoms, and nasal
mucosal inflammation

Radiographic, QOL, nasal


patency, olfaction, and nasal
mucosal inflammation

QOL

Symptom, QOL, endoscopy,


mucus transport, and
olfaction

Symptom, QOL, endoscopy,


mucus transport, and
olfaction

Symptom, endoscopy, polyp


size, cure, and radiographic

Symptom, QOL, endoscopy,


and radiographic

Symptom, radiographic,
endoscopy, and nasal
secretions

Symptom, QOL, endoscopy,


radiographic, and adverse
events

Primary End Point

(continued)

Mepolizumab was associated with a greater change in polyp


score from baseline (mean change, 1.30 vs 0.0 [on a 0-4
scale]; P = .028) compared with placebo at 8 wk; significant
improvements were also seen in mean CT score

No difference in efficacy outcomes but was not designed with


sufficient power

Omalizumab was associated with improved polyp scores


(mean reduction, 2.67 vs 0.12 [on a 0-4 scale]; P = .02)
after 16 wk of treatment compared with placebo; significant
improvements were also seen in CT score, individual symptoms,
and QOL

No differences in the median changes in CT score (11.9% vs


5.9% reduction; P = .391), QOL score (mean reduction, 5.5 vs
2.3; P = .60), olfaction score (mean reduction, 3 vs 4
; P = .31), nasal endoscopy score (mean reduction, 0 vs 0.5;
P = .58), eosinophils in nasal lavage (mean reduction, 2 vs 9;
P = .47), and total symptom scores (mean reduction, 1 vs 0;
P = .21) between omalizumab and placebo, respectively

Macrolide for 3 mo was associated with improved QOL


compared with placebo at a single time point after starting
therapy (24 wk) (SMD, 0.43 [95% CI, 0.82 to 0.05]); the
clinical significance of this improvement is questionable

Macrolide for 3 mo was superior to placebo for patients with no


polyps, particularly those with low IgE; macrolide therapy was
no different than placebo in mixed group of patients with and
without polyps

Roxithromycin for 3 mo was superior to placebo for patients


without polyps; no difference in outcomes 12 wk after stopping
therapy

Uncontrolled trials demonstrate mixed outcomes in patients


without polyps; a level 1b study demonstrated that doxycycline
therapy was superior to placebo for reducing polyp size up to
12 wk after completing the therapy (P = .015)

Oral corticosteroids improve short-term symptoms, QOL, and


endoscopy scores for nasal polyps compared with placebo;
inadequate evidence to support the use of oral corticosteroids
for patients without polyps

Inadequate evidence to support the use of oral corticosteroids


for patients without polyps

Oral corticosteroids improve short-term symptoms, QOL,


and endoscopy compared with placebo

Conclusions

Medical Therapies for Adult Chronic Sinusitis


Review Clinical Review & Education

(Reprinted) JAMA September 1, 2015 Volume 314, Number 9

933

934

Systematic review
(2a)

Systematic review
(2a)

Systematic review
(2a)

Rudmik et al,41 2013

Soler et al,61 2013

Wei et al,69 2013

Meta-analysis (1a)

Meta-analysis (1a)

Sacks et al,71 2011

Wang et al,72 2014


5 (1b)

5 (1b)

3 (1b) and
3 (2b)

2 (2b)

2 (1b), 1 (2b),
2 (2c), and
4 (4)

2 (1b), 1 (2b),
1 (2c), 2 (3a),
and 4 (4)

5 (2b), 2 (3b),
and 7 (4)

No. of Studies
(LOEa)

300 patients

327 patients

284 patients

NA

NA

NA

NA

Sample Size

Topical
amphotericin B
vs placebo

Topical
amphotericin B
vs placebo

Topical
amphotericin B
vs placebo

No polyps

No polyps

No polyps

No polyps

Population
Treated

No polyps

No polyps

No polyps

QOL and endoscopy

Symptom, QOL,
and adverse effects

Symptom, endoscopy,
and radiologic

Symptom, QOL,
and endoscopy

Symptom, QOL,
and endoscopy

QOL and endoscopy score

QOL, endoscopy score,


and bacterial culture rates

Primary End Point

Topical amphotericin B was no different than placebo for


no polyps

Topical amphotericin failed to improve QOL (SMD, 0.18


[95% CI, 0.05 to 0.42]) and endoscopy scores (SMD, 0.00
[95% CI, 0.26 to 0.26]); placebo improved symptom scores
compared with topical amphotericin B (SMD, 0.35 [95% CI,
0.07 to 0.63])

Topical amphotericin B was no different than placebo in all 3


outcomes (all P > .11)

There is insufficient evidence to support the use of topical


antibiotic therapy for patients without polyps

Evidence does not support the routine use of topical antibiotic


therapy for chronic sinusitis

Evidence does not support the routine use of topical antibiotic


therapy chronic sinusitis; single level 1b study demonstrated
that high-volume mupirocin irrigations were superior to
placebo when sinus cultures were positive for
Staphylococcus aureus

Nebulized and spray-delivered topical antibiotics failed to


improve outcomes in level 2b studies; lower-quality studies
demonstrate a potential benefit of topical antibiotic therapy for
chronic sinusitis without polyps

Conclusions

Level of evidence scale was from the Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine.31

Tobramycin and neomycin

Fosfomycin, N-chlorotaurine,
bacitracin, tobramycin,
mupirocin, and neomycin

Neomycin, tobramycin-saline,
bacitracin, gentamycin, and
mupirocin

Neomycin, tobramycin,
ceftazidime, N-chlorotaurine,
dibekacin, fosfomycin,
mupirocin, and amphotericin B

Study Groups

Abbreviations: CT, computed tomography; IL, interleukin; INS, intranasal steroid; LOE, level of evidence; NA, not
applicable; QOL, quality of life; RCT, randomized clinical trial; SMD, standardized mean difference.

Meta-analysis (1a)

Isaacs et al,70 2011

Topical Antifungals

Systematic review
(2a)

Study Design
(LOEa)

Lim et al,68 2008

Topical Antibiotics

Source

Table 4. Highest-Level Evidence for Intermittent or Rescue Therapies for Chronic Sinusitis (continued)

Clinical Review & Education Review


Medical Therapies for Adult Chronic Sinusitis

JAMA September 1, 2015 Volume 314, Number 9 (Reprinted)

Copyright 2015 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.

Downloaded From: http://jama.jamanetwork.com/ by a Universidad Autonoma de Baja California User on 09/02/2015

jama.com

Medical Therapies for Adult Chronic Sinusitis

Review Clinical Review & Education

Table 5. Comparison of Guideline Recommendations for Medical Therapies in the Management of Chronic Sinusitis
Recommendation Levela
Grade of Evidence and
Recommendation: Current Review

EPOS Guidelines 20122

Canadian Sinusitis
Guidelines 20111

BSACI Guidelines 200895

Nasal Polyps

Nasal Polyps No Polyps

Nasal Polyps No Polyps

Nasal Polyps No Polyps

No Polyps

Maintenance Therapies
Topical corticosteroid

A-I

A-I

++

++

++

++

++

++

Saline irrigations

A-I

A-I

++

++

++

LTA

A-II

None

None

None

NE

Systemic antihistamineb

None

None

None

None

++

++

Allergy immunotherapy

C-II

C-II

None

None

NE

NE

Intermittent or Rescue Therapies


Systemic corticosteroid

A-I

C-II

++

++

++

Short-term antibiotic

B-Ic

A-II

Long-term macrolide

B-III

A-II

++

Anti-IgE monoclonal antibody

A-II

None

None

NE

NE

NE

NE

Anti-IL-5 monoclonal antibody

A-II

None

None

NE

NE

NE

NE

Topical antibiotic

None

A-III

None

NE

NE

Topical antifungal

None

A-III

None

NE

NE

Abbreviations: BSACI, British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology;


EPOS, European Position Paper on Sinusitis; LTA, leukotriene antagonist; NE,
not evaluated.
a

Recommendation level symbols indicate the following: + +, strong


recommendation for use; +, weak recommendation for use; , strong
recommendation against use; , weak recommendation against use; none,
represents the topic was evaluated but lack of evidence resulted in no
recommendation provided.

serum IgE/mL; max dose of 375 mg) to placebo (Table 4). Both studies lacked statistical power and contained moderate estimates of bias
making it challenging to draw definitive conclusions from the reported associations between improved radiologic (ie, computerized tomography scan) and polyp scores at 16 weeks of omalizumab compared with placebo.
In summary, an A-II grade and recommendation is designated
to anti-IgE therapy for chronic sinusitis with nasal polyposis and
asthma. No evidence grade and recommendation is assigned for antiIgE therapy for patients without nasal polyps.

AntiInterleukin 5 Therapy
Anti-interleukin 5 (IL-5) therapy involves delivering a humanized
IgG monoclonal antibody that binds free IL-5 and impairs
eosinophilic-mediated inflammation.89 Two RCTs evaluated antiIL-5 therapy (reslizumab and mepolizumab) for nasal polyposis
(Table 4).66,67 Both studies were small (n 30), lacked long-term
follow-up, and contained moderate to high estimates of bias.
Reslizumab (1 or 3 mg/kg) did not improve symptom scores compared with placebo but slightly reduced blood eosinophil levels.
Mepolizumab (2 injections of 750 mg received 28 days apart) was
associated with improved polyp scores in approximately 50% of
patients compared with placebo but the study did not evaluate
patient-reported outcomes.
In summary, an A-II grade and recommendation is designated
for anti-IL-5 monoclonal antibody therapy in patients with nasal polyposis. No grade of evidence or recommendation is assigned for antiIL-5 therapy for patients without nasal polyps.
jama.com

Antihistamines are not indicated as sinusitis-specific treatment but should be


considered in patients with concurrent allergic rhinitis.

Short-term antibiotic use in patients with nasal polyps limited to doxycycline


200 mg once then 100 mg daily for 20 days.73

Topical Antibacterials
Four systematic reviews41,61,68,69 evaluated topical antibiotics for
chronic sinusitis without nasal polyps (Table 4). All RCTs contained
small sample sizes, evaluated different topical antibiotics, and used
different application techniques. Three RCTs demonstrated no difference in clinical outcomes compared with placebo. One RCT demonstrated improved short-term symptom improvement using a highvolume (240 mL divided between 2 nasal cavities) mupirocin
irrigation compared with placebo in a specific cohort of patients with
a sinus culture positive for Staphylococcus aureus.90 There was no
difference in sinus-specific QOL with mupirocin irrigation compared with placebo.
In summary, the routine use of topical antibiotics during the management of chronic sinusitis without nasal polyps is not recommended and has an A-III grade designation. High-volume topical mupirocin irrigations may be appropriate therapy in select cases of
recalcitrant disease with a sinus culture positive for S aureus. No grade
of evidence or recommendation is designated for the use of topical
antibiotics for nasal polyposis.

Topical Antifungals
Fungi colonize the nasal mucosa in 96% of both chronic sinusitis
patients and healthy controls.91,92 This created a hypothesis that
an abnormal immunological response to fungi may cause chronic
sinusitis and eradication of fungi may resolve sinus disease.93,94
Topical amphotericin B binds ergosterol (a component of the fungal cell membrane) and creates a transmembrane ion channel
leading to fungal death.
(Reprinted) JAMA September 1, 2015 Volume 314, Number 9

Copyright 2015 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.

Downloaded From: http://jama.jamanetwork.com/ by a Universidad Autonoma de Baja California User on 09/02/2015

935

Clinical Review & Education Review

Medical Therapies for Adult Chronic Sinusitis

Figure 2. Evidence-Based Approach to Medical Therapy for Chronic Sinusitis


Chronic sinusitis
(see Box 1)

Topical intranasal corticosteroids (daily)


and saline irrigations (daily)

No

Active mucopurulence present?

Yes
Short-course antibiotic
Culture-directed or broad
spectrum when indicated

Reassess in 1 to 3 months

Persistent symptomsa
or acute exacerbation

Resolved or mild symptomsb

Continue treatment

Yes

Nasal polyps present?

No

Short course of systemic corticosteroidc for

Long-term antibiotic (macrolide)d

14-21 days
Prednisone 30-50 mg daily (taper when indicated)
Prednisolone 20-60 mg daily (taper when indicated)
Consider
Short course of doxycycline 200 mg once followed
by 100 mg daily for 21 days
Culture-directed antibiotic (in the presence
of mucopurulent discharge on examination)

Clarithromycin 250-500 mg daily for 3 months


Roxithromycin 150 mg daily for 3 months
Consider
Short course of systemic corticosteroidc
Culture-directed short-course antibiotic (only in the
presence of mucopurulent discharge on examination)

Persistent symptomsa

No

Persistent symptoms implies that


the patient is still experiencing
chronic sinusitisspecific symptoms
that are negatively effecting quality
of life and daily productivity or
functioning.

Mild symptoms implies that the


patient is still experiencing chronic
sinusitisspecific symptoms but
they are not negatively effecting
quality of life and daily productivity
or functioning.

Patient and physician should


participate in an open discussion
about the known benefits and the
potential adverse effects of
systemic corticosteroids to help
inform patient decision making.

Risk of cardiac arrhythmia and


cardiovascular death; risk of
rhabdomyolysis in patients
currently taking an oral
3-hydroxy-3-methylglutarylcoenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase
inhibitor.

Continue treatment

Yes
Does patient have concurrent
allergic rhinitis?

No

Yes

Consider
Systemic antihistamine
Leukotriene pathway antagonist
Allergy immunotherapy

Consider endoscopic sinus surgery

Resolved or mild symptomsb

Three meta-analyses (327 patients)70-72 demonstrated no benefitoftopicalamphotericinBcomparedwithplaceboforpatientswithout nasal polyps. Therefore, use of topical antifungals for chronic sinusitis without nasal polyps is not recommended and has an A-III grade
designation. No grade of evidence can be made for nasal polyposis.

Discussion
Basedonavailableevidence,medicaltherapyforchronicsinusitisshould
begin with daily application of a topical intranasal corticosteroid in conjunction with high-volume saline irrigation. Subsequent therapies are
based on the patients polyp status and severity of symptoms or QOL
impairment. Although there have been several published guidelines
evaluating adult chronic sinusitis,1-3,95 only 3 include specific treatment
936

recommendations.1,2,95 Table 5 summarizes the overall grades of evidence from this review and how they compare with published guidelines from Europe, Canada, and the United Kingdom.
First, there were differences regarding use of leukotriene antagonists for treating nasal polyposis. The outcomes from 2 RCTs
evaluating leukotriene antagonists demonstrated mixed results;
therefore, available evidence is consistent with an A-II grade of evidence and recommendation. This differs from the A grade of evidence and recommendation against the use of leukotriene antagonists (ie, equivalent to an A-III grade) to treat nasal polyposis made
in the European guidelines.
Second, there were differences pertaining to the use of long-term
macrolide therapy in patients with nasal polyps. The only RCT evaluating long-term macrolide therapy, which included patients with nasal polyposis, demonstrated no difference compared with placebo.

JAMA September 1, 2015 Volume 314, Number 9 (Reprinted)

Copyright 2015 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.

Downloaded From: http://jama.jamanetwork.com/ by a Universidad Autonoma de Baja California User on 09/02/2015

jama.com

Medical Therapies for Adult Chronic Sinusitis

Review Clinical Review & Education

Thus, this review placed a B-III grade of evidence and recommendation against the use of long-term macrolide for nasal polyposis. This is
in contrast to a C grade of evidence and recommendation for its use in
patients with nasal polyps by the European and British guidelines.
This review has limitations. First, the quality of included studies used to generate evidence-based conclusions was limited. Several medical therapies lacked level 1 evidence and several RCTs contained moderate to high risk of bias (eTable 2 in the Supplement).
Second, some studies used different diagnostic criteria for chronic
sinusitis and included mixed cohorts of sinusitis patients (eg, with
and without nasal polyps), limiting the ability to make specific conclusions. Third, some of the meta-analyses included the same RCTs
(ie, a RCT may be included in more than 1 meta-analysis).

Evidence-Based Medical Therapy Approach: Chronic


Sinusitis With Nasal Polyposis
An evidence-based but nonvalidated approach for the medical management of patients with nasal polyposis is provided in Figure 2. The
goal is to reduce the size or eliminate nasal polyps because they can
obstruct the nasal cavity and impair the sense of smell, restrict the
ability to breathe through the nose, and obstruct physiologic drainage of the sinuses.45,96 Patients with symptomatic nasal polyps after initial medical therapy (ie, topical corticosteroid with saline irrigations) may warrant a short-course of oral corticosteroids. Because
the expected benefit of systemic corticosteroids is relatively brief
(<3 months), it should be emphasized that this treatment ought to
be combined with maintenance topical corticosteroid therapy.
Systemic antibiotic therapy is not recommended for managing
nasal polyposis. However, during periods of acute exacerbation with
superimposed infection a broad-spectrum antibiotic may be necessary to help patients return to their baseline health state. Alternatively, an endoscopic-directed sinus swab of purulent secretions
within the middle meatus may guide a culture-directed course of oral
antibiotics. Due to the demonstrated effects on reducing the size
of nasal polyps, a short-course of doxycycline (200 mg once followed by 100 mg for 21 days) or a leukotriene antagonist may be considered to further reduce polyp burden.
Patients with chronic sinusitis who experience persistent symptomsdespitecomprehensivemedicaltherapymayconsiderendoscopic
sinus surgery. All 4 multidisciplinary practice guidelines recommend
(C-I grade of evidence and recommendation) consideration of endoscopic sinus surgery for select patients with chronic sinusitis who have
persistentsymptomsdespitetrialsofappropriatemedicaltherapy.1,2,95

ARTICLE INFORMATION
Author Contributions: Drs Rudmik and Soler had
full access to all of the data in the study and take
responsibility for the integrity of the data and the
accuracy of the data analysis.
Study concept and design: All authors.
Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: All
authors.
Drafting of the manuscript: All authors.
Critical revision of the manuscript for important
intellectual content: All authors.
Administrative, technical, or material support: All
authors.
Study supervision: Rudmik.
Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Both authors
have completed and submitted the ICMJE Form for

jama.com

Evidence-Based Approach: Medical Therapy for Chronic


Sinusitis Without Nasal Polyps
The initial approach to managing chronic sinusitis without nasal polyps is similar to that of nasal polyposis with several notable differences (Figure 2). First, patients without polyps benefit to a greater degree from prolonged courses of macrolide therapy compared with
patients with nasal polyps. Evidence-based long-term macrolide protocols may require 3 months of clarithromycin 250 to 500 mg once
daily, roxithromycin 150 mg daily, or azithromycin 500 mg once per
week.63,97 Potential adverse effects of prolonged macrolide therapy
should be considered, including rhabdomyolysis98 and prolonged QT
interval with cardiovascular death,99 along with prolonged bleeding
risk and sedation with co-administration with warfarin and benzodiazepines, respectively (Table 3).100,101 The estimated risk of death attributable to macrolide is 1 event per every 4100 prescriptions among
patients with high cardiovascular risk and 1 event per 100 000 among
patients with low cardiovascular risk.99 Second, there is a lack of consistent evidence supporting the routine use of short-course systemic corticosteroids (C-II grade of evidence with recommendation)
in patients without polyps, whereas evidence is stronger in patients
with polyps. Lastly, there is no research evaluating the use of leukotriene antagonists for patients without nasal polyps.

Future Directions
Given the high prevalence and large economic burden of chronic
sinusitis,15 future research should improve the quality of evidence
for individual therapies and validate treatment pathways to optimize the quality of care. Furthermore, the studies included in this
review considered chronic sinusitis as a single clinical entity with subgroups defined only by polyp status. Future research should develop personalized therapies that target precise features of the patients abnormal immune-environment interaction to maximally
improve outcomes.

Conclusion
Evidence supports daily high-volume saline irrigation with topical corticosteroid therapy as a first-line therapy for chronic sinusitis. A short
course of systemic corticosteroids (1-3 weeks), short course of doxycycline (3 weeks), or a leukotriene antagonist may be considered in
patients with nasal polyps. A prolonged course (3 months) of macrolide antibiotic may be considered for patients without polyps.

Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Dr Soler


reports receiving consulting fees from Brainlab and
Olympus and receiving grant support from the
National Institutes of Health and the National
Institute on Deafness and Other Communication
Disorders. No other disclosures were reported.
Additional Contributions: We thank Timothy L.
Smith, MD, MPH (Oregon Health and Science
University), and Rodney J. Schlosser, MD (Medical
University of South Carolina), for their academic
mentorship and support of this project. No one
received compensation for their contribution.
Submissions:We encourage authors to
submit papers for consideration as a Review.
Please contact Edward Livingston, MD,
at Edward.livingston@jamanetwork.org

or Mary McGrae McDermott, MD, at


mdm608@northwestern.edu.
REFERENCES
1. Desrosiers M, Evans GA, Keith PK, et al. Canadian
clinical practice guidelines for acute and chronic
rhinosinusitis. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011;
40(suppl 2):S99-S193.
2. Fokkens WJ, Lund VJ, Mullol J, et al. EPOS 2012:
European position paper on rhinosinusitis and nasal
polyps 2012: a summary for otorhinolaryngologists.
Rhinology. 2012;50(1):1-12.
3. Rosenfeld RM, Piccirillo JF, Chandrasekhar SS,
et al. Clinical practice guideline (update): adult
sinusitis. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015;152(2
suppl):S1-S39.

(Reprinted) JAMA September 1, 2015 Volume 314, Number 9

Copyright 2015 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.

Downloaded From: http://jama.jamanetwork.com/ by a Universidad Autonoma de Baja California User on 09/02/2015

937

Clinical Review & Education Review

Medical Therapies for Adult Chronic Sinusitis

4. Bhattacharyya N. The economic burden and


symptom manifestations of chronic rhinosinusitis.
Am J Rhinol. 2003;17(1):27-32.
5. Bhattacharyya N. Clinical and symptom criteria
for the accurate diagnosis of chronic rhinosinusitis.
Laryngoscope. 2006;116(7 Pt 2)(suppl 110):1-22.
6. Soler ZM, Mace J, Smith TL. Symptom-based
presentation of chronic rhinosinusitis and
symptom-specific outcomes after endoscopic sinus
surgery. Am J Rhinol. 2008;22(3):297-301.
7. Dietz de Loos DA, Hopkins C, Fokkens WJ.
Symptoms in chronic rhinosinusitis with and
without nasal polyps. Laryngoscope. 2013;123(1):5763.
8. Rudmik L, Smith TL. Quality of life in patients
with chronic rhinosinusitis. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep.
2011;11(3):247-252.
9. Alt JA, Smith TL. Chronic rhinosinusitis and
sleep: a contemporary review. Int Forum Allergy
Rhinol. 2013;3(11):941-949.
10. Rudmik L, Smith TL, Schlosser RJ, Hwang PH,
Mace JC, Soler ZM. Productivity costs in patients
with refractory chronic rhinosinusitis. Laryngoscope.
2014;124(9):2007-2012.
11. Halawi AM, Smith SS, Chandra RK. Chronic
rhinosinusitis: epidemiology and cost. Allergy
Asthma Proc. 2013;34(4):328-334.
12. Tan BK, Kern RC, Schleimer RP, Schwartz BS.
Chronic rhinosinusitis: the unrecognized epidemic.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013;188(11):1275-1277.
13. Bhattacharyya N. Incremental health care
utilization and expenditures for chronic
rhinosinusitis in the United States. Ann Otol Rhinol
Laryngol. 2011;120(7):423-427.
14. Mattos JL, Woodard CR, Payne SC. Trends in
common rhinologic illnesses: analysis of US
healthcare surveys 1995-2007. Int Forum Allergy
Rhinol. 2011;1(1):3-12.
15. Smith KA, Orlandi RR, Rudmik L. Cost of adult
chronic rhinosinusitis: a systematic review.
Laryngoscope. 2015;125(7):1547-1556.
16. Van Crombruggen K, Zhang N, Gevaert P,
Tomassen P, Bachert C. Pathogenesis of chronic
rhinosinusitis: inflammation. J Allergy Clin Immunol.
2011;128(4):728-732.
17. Ocampo CJ, Grammer LC. Chronic
rhinosinusitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract.
2013;1(3):205-211; quiz 212-203.
18. Hsu J, Avila PC, Kern RC, Hayes MG, Schleimer
RP, Pinto JM. Genetics of chronic rhinosinusitis:
state of the field and directions forward. J Allergy
Clin Immunol. 2013;131(4):977-993, 993 e971-975.
19. Bassiouni A, Naidoo Y, Wormald PJ. Does
mucosal remodeling in chronic rhinosinusitis result
in irreversible mucosal disease? Laryngoscope.
2012;122(1):225-229.

938

23. Adappa ND, Howland TJ, Palmer JN, et al.


Genetics of the taste receptor T2R38 correlates
with chronic rhinosinusitis necessitating surgical
intervention. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2013;3(3):
184-187.
24. Akdis CA, Bachert C, Cingi C, et al. Endotypes
and phenotypes of chronic rhinosinusitis:
a PRACTALL document of the European Academy
of Allergy and Clinical Immunology and the
American Academy of Allergy, Asthma &
Immunology. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2013;131(6):
1479-1490.
25. Anderson GP. Endotyping asthma: new insights
into key pathogenic mechanisms in a complex,
heterogeneous disease. Lancet. 2008;372(9643):
1107-1119.
26. Ltvall J, Akdis CA, Bacharier LB, et al. Asthma
endotypes: a new approach to classification of
disease entities within the asthma syndrome.
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011;127(2):355-360.
27. Parnham MJ, Erakovic Haber V,
Giamarellos-Bourboulis EJ, Perletti G, Verleden GM,
Vos R. Azithromycin: mechanisms of action and
their relevance for clinical applications. Pharmacol
Ther. 2014;143(2):225-245.
28. van Drunen CM, Reinartz S, Wigman J, Fokkens
WJ. Inflammation in chronic rhinosinusitis and nasal
polyposis. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am. 2009;
29(4):621-629.
29. Yoon BN, Choi NG, Lee HS, Cho KS, Roh HJ.
Induction of interleukin-8 from nasal epithelial cells
during bacterial infection: the role of IL-8 for
neutrophil recruitment in chronic rhinosinusitis.
Mediators Inflamm. 2010;2010:813610.
30. Ocampo CJ, Peters AT. Medical therapy as the
primary modality for the management of chronic
rhinosinusitis. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2013;34(2):132137.
31. Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine.
Levels of evidence. http://www.cebm.net/oxford
-centre-evidence-based-medicine-levels-evidence
-march-2009/. Accessed February 1, 2015.

38. Kalish L, Snidvongs K, Sivasubramaniam R,


Cope D, Harvey RJ. Topical steroids for nasal polyps.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;12:CD006549.
39. Fandio M, Macdonald KI, Lee J, Witterick IJ.
The use of postoperative topical corticosteroids in
chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps:
a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Rhinol
Allergy. 2013;27(5):e146-e157.
40. Harvey R, Hannan SA, Badia L, Scadding G.
Nasal saline irrigations for the symptoms of chronic
rhinosinusitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;
(3):CD006394.
41. Rudmik L, Hoy M, Schlosser RJ, et al. Topical
therapies in the management of chronic
rhinosinusitis: an evidence-based review with
recommendations. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2013;3
(4):281-298.
42. van den Berg JW, de Nier LM, Kaper NM, et al.
Limited evidence: higher efficacy of nasal saline
irrigation over nasal saline spray in chronic
rhinosinusitisan update and reanalysis of the
evidence base. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014;
150(1):16-21.
43. Wentzel JL, Soler ZM, DeYoung K, Nguyen SA,
Lohia S, Schlosser RJ. Leukotriene antagonists in
nasal polyposis: a meta-analysis and systematic
review. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2013;27(6):482-489.
44. DeYoung K, Wentzel JL, Schlosser RJ, Nguyen
SA, Soler ZM. Systematic review of immunotherapy
for chronic rhinosinusitis. Am J Rhinol Allergy.
2014;28(2):145-150.
45. Vaidyanathan S, Barnes M, Williamson P,
Hopkinson P, Donnan PT, Lipworth B. Treatment of
chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis with oral
steroids followed by topical steroids: a randomized
trial. Ann Intern Med. 2011;154(5):293-302.
46. Thomas WW III, Harvey RJ, Rudmik L, Hwang
PH, Schlosser RJ. Distribution of topical agents to
the paranasal sinuses: an evidence-based review
with recommendations. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol.
2013;3(9):691-703.

32. Manual for ACC/AHA Guideline Writing


Committees. Section II: tools and methods for
creating guidelines. http://circ.ahajournals.org/site
/manual/manual_IIstep6.xhtml. Accessed
December 28, 2014.

47. Rudmik L. High volume sinonasal budesonide


irrigations for chronic rhinosinusitis: an update on
the safety and effectiveness. http://omicsgroup.org
/journals/high-volume-sinonasal-budesonide
-irrigations-for-chronic-rhinosinusitis-2167-1052
.1000148.pdf. Accessed December 27, 2014.

33. Higgins JP, Green S. Cochrane Handbook for


Systematic Reviews of Interventions, version 5.1.0.
http://www.cochrane-handbook.org. Accessed May
4, 2015.

48. Pynnonen MA, Mukerji SS, Kim HM, Adams


ME, Terrell JE. Nasal saline for chronic sinonasal
symptoms: a randomized controlled trial. Arch
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007;133(11):1115-1120.

34. Joe SA, Thambi R, Huang J. A systematic


review of the use of intranasal steroids in the
treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis. Otolaryngol
Head Neck Surg. 2008;139(3):340-347.

49. Pauli C, Fintelmann R, Klemens C, et al.


Polyposis nasiimprovement in quality of life by
the influence of leukotriene receptor antagonists
[in German]. Laryngorhinootologie. 2007;86(4):
282-286.

20. Lee RJ, Cohen NA. Taste receptors in innate


immunity. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2015;72(2):217-236.

35. Kalish LH, Arendts G, Sacks R, Craig JC. Topical


steroids in chronic rhinosinusitis without polyps:
a systematic review and meta-analysis. Otolaryngol
Head Neck Surg. 2009;141(6):674-683.

21. Lee RJ, Cohen NA. Role of the bitter taste


receptor T2R38 in upper respiratory infection and
chronic rhinosinusitis. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol.
2015;15(1):14-20.

36. Snidvongs K, Kalish L, Sacks R, Craig JC, Harvey


RJ. Topical steroid for chronic rhinosinusitis without
polyps. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;(8):
CD009274.

22. Adappa ND, Zhang Z, Palmer JN, et al. The


bitter taste receptor T2R38 is an independent risk
factor for chronic rhinosinusitis requiring sinus
surgery. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2014;4(1):3-7.

37. Rudmik L, Schlosser RJ, Smith TL, Soler ZM.


Impact of topical nasal steroid therapy on
symptoms of nasal polyposis: a meta-analysis.
Laryngoscope. 2012;122(7):1431-1437.

50. Schper C, Noga O, Koch B, et al.


Anti-inflammatory properties of montelukast, a
leukotriene receptor antagonist in patients with
asthma and nasal polyposis. J Investig Allergol Clin
Immunol. 2011;21(1):51-58.
51. Stewart RA, Ram B, Hamilton G, Weiner J, Kane
KJ. Montelukast as an adjunct to oral and inhaled
steroid therapy in chronic nasal polyposis.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008;139(5):682-687.
52. Vuralkan E, Saka C, Akin I, et al. Comparison of
montelukast and mometasone furoate in the
prevention of recurrent nasal polyps. Ther Adv
Respir Dis. 2012;6(1):5-10.

JAMA September 1, 2015 Volume 314, Number 9 (Reprinted)

Copyright 2015 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.

Downloaded From: http://jama.jamanetwork.com/ by a Universidad Autonoma de Baja California User on 09/02/2015

jama.com

Medical Therapies for Adult Chronic Sinusitis

Review Clinical Review & Education

53. Mostafa BE, Abdel Hay H, Mohammed HE,


Yamani M. Role of leukotriene inhibitors in the
postoperative management of nasal polyps. ORL J
Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 2005;67(3):148-153.

69. Wei CC, Adappa ND, Cohen NA. Use of topical


nasal therapies in the management of chronic
rhinosinusitis. Laryngoscope. 2013;123(10):23472359.

54. Dykewicz MS, Hamilos DL. Rhinitis and


sinusitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2010;125(2)(suppl
2):S103-S115.

70. Isaacs S, Fakhri S, Luong A, Citardi MJ.


A meta-analysis of topical amphotericin B for the
treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis. Int Forum
Allergy Rhinol. 2011;1(4):250-254.

55. Wilson KF, McMains KC, Orlandi RR. The


association between allergy and chronic
rhinosinusitis with and without nasal polyps: an
evidence-based review with recommendations. Int
Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2014;4(2):93-103.
56. Hellings PW, Fokkens WJ, Akdis C, et al.
Uncontrolled allergic rhinitis and chronic
rhinosinusitis: where do we stand today? Allergy.
2013;68(1):1-7.
57. Cox L, Nelson H, Lockey R, et al. Allergen
immunotherapy: a practice parameter third update.
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011;127(1)(suppl):S1-S55.
58. Martinez-Devesa P, Patiar S. Oral steroids for
nasal polyps. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;(7):
CD005232.
59. Lal D, Hwang PH. Oral corticosteroid therapy in
chronic rhinosinusitis without polyposis:
a systematic review. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2011;1
(2):136-143.
60. Poetker DM, Jakubowski LA, Lal D, Hwang PH,
Wright ED, Smith TL. Oral corticosteroids in the
management of adult chronic rhinosinusitis with
and without nasal polyps: an evidence-based
review with recommendations. Int Forum Allergy
Rhinol. 2013;3(2):104-120.
61. Soler ZM, Oyer SL, Kern RC, et al. Antimicrobials
and chronic rhinosinusitis with or without polyposis
in adults: an evidenced-based review with
recommendations. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2013;3
(1):31-47.
62. Piromchai P, Thanaviratananich S, Laopaiboon
M. Systemic antibiotics for chronic rhinosinusitis
without nasal polyps in adults. Cochrane Database
Syst Rev. 2011;(5):CD008233.
63. Pynnonen MA, Venkatraman G, Davis GE.
Macrolide therapy for chronic rhinosinusitis:
a meta-analysis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013;
148(3):366-373.
64. Pinto JM, Mehta N, DiTineo M, Wang J,
Baroody FM, Naclerio RM. A randomized,
double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of anti-IgE for
chronic rhinosinusitis. Rhinology. 2010;48(3):318324.
65. Gevaert P, Calus L, Van Zele T, et al.
Omalizumab is effective in allergic and nonallergic
patients with nasal polyps and asthma. J Allergy Clin
Immunol. 2013;131(1):110-116.e111.
66. Gevaert P, Lang-Loidolt D, Lackner A, et al.
Nasal IL-5 levels determine the response to anti-IL-5
treatment in patients with nasal polyps. J Allergy
Clin Immunol. 2006;118(5):1133-1141.
67. Gevaert P, Van Bruaene N, Cattaert T, et al.
Mepolizumab, a humanized anti-IL-5 mAb, as a
treatment option for severe nasal polyposis.
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011;128(5):989-995.e1-8.
68. Lim M, Citardi MJ, Leong JL. Topical
antimicrobials in the management of chronic
rhinosinusitis: a systematic review. Am J Rhinol.
2008;22(4):381-389.

jama.com

71. Sacks PL, Harvey RJ, Rimmer J, Gallagher RM,


Sacks R. Topical and systemic antifungal therapy for
the symptomatic treatment of chronic
rhinosinusitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;
(8):CD008263.
72. Wang T, Su J, Feng Y. The effectiveness topical
amphotericin B in the management of chronic
rhinosinusitis: a meta-analysis. Eur Arch
Otorhinolaryngol. 2015;272(8):1923-1929.
73. Van Zele T, Gevaert P, Holtappels G, et al. Oral
steroids and doxycycline: 2 different approaches to
treat nasal polyps. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2010;125
(5):1069-1076.e4.
74. Hessler JL, Piccirillo JF, Fang D, et al. Clinical
outcomes of chronic rhinosinusitis in response to
medical therapy: results of a prospective study. Am
J Rhinol. 2007;21(1):10-18.
75. Ikeda K, Sakurada T, Suzaki Y, Takasaka T.
Efficacy of systemic corticosteroid treatment for
anosmia with nasal and paranasal sinus disease.
Rhinology. 1995;33(3):162-165.
76. Lal D, Scianna JM, Stankiewicz JA. Efficacy of
targeted medical therapy in chronic rhinosinusitis,
and predictors of failure. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2009;
23(4):396-400.
77. Subramanian HN, Schechtman KB, Hamilos DL.
A retrospective analysis of treatment outcomes and
time to relapse after intensive medical treatment
for chronic sinusitis. Am J Rhinol. 2002;16(6):303312.
78. Poetker DM, Reh DD. A comprehensive review
of the adverse effects of systemic corticosteroids.
Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2010;43(4):753-768.
79. Dellamonica P, Choutet P, Lejeune JM, et al.
Efficacy and tolerance of cefotiam hexetil in the
super-infected chronic sinusitis: a randomized,
double-blind study in comparison with cefixime [in
French]. Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac. 1994;111
(4):217-222.
80. Legent F, Bordure P, Beauvillain C, Berche P.
A double-blind comparison of ciprofloxacin and
amoxycillin/clavulanic acid in the treatment of
chronic sinusitis. Chemotherapy. 1994;40(suppl 1):
8-15.

85. Wallwork B, Coman W, Mackay-Sim A, Greiff L,


Cervin A. A double-blind, randomized,
placebo-controlled trial of macrolide in the
treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis. Laryngoscope.
2006;116(2):189-193.
86. Videler WJ, Badia L, Harvey RJ, et al. Lack of
efficacy of long-term, low-dose azithromycin in
chronic rhinosinusitis: a randomized controlled trial.
Allergy. 2011;66(11):1457-1468.
87. Chang TW, Shiung YY. Anti-IgE as a mast
cell-stabilizing therapeutic agent. J Allergy Clin
Immunol. 2006;117(6):1203-1212.
88. Bachert C, Zhang N. Chronic rhinosinusitis and
asthma: novel understanding of the role of IgE
above atopy. J Intern Med. 2012;272(2):133-143.
89. Mepolizumab: 240563, anti-IL-5 monoclonal
antibodyGlaxoSmithKline, anti-interleukin-5
monoclonal antibodyGlaxoSmithKline, SB
240563. Drugs R D. 2008;9(2):125-130.
90. Jervis-Bardy J, Boase S, Psaltis A, Foreman A,
Wormald PJ. A randomized trial of mupirocin
sinonasal rinses versus saline in surgically
recalcitrant staphylococcal chronic rhinosinusitis.
Laryngoscope. 2012;122(10):2148-2153.
91. Braun H, Buzina W, Freudenschuss K, Beham A,
Stammberger H. Eosinophilic fungal
rhinosinusitis: a common disorder in Europe?
Laryngoscope. 2003;113(2):264-269.
92. Ponikau JU, Sherris DA, Kern EB, et al. The
diagnosis and incidence of allergic fungal sinusitis.
Mayo Clin Proc. 1999;74(9):877-884.
93. Lanza DC, Dhong HJ, Tantilipikorn P,
Tanabodee J, Nadel DM, Kennedy DW. Fungus and
chronic rhinosinusitis: from bench to clinical
understanding. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl.
2006;196:27-34.
94. IFI Claims Patent Services. Methods and
materials for treating and preventing inflammation
of mucosal tissue. http://www.google.com
/patents/US6291500. Accessed January 30, 2015.
95. Scadding GK, Durham SR, Mirakian R, et al.
BSACI guidelines for the management of
rhinosinusitis and nasal polyposis. Clin Exp Allergy.
2008;38(2):260-275.
96. Rudmik L, Smith TL. Olfactory improvement
after endoscopic sinus surgery. Curr Opin
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012;20(1):29-32.
97. Cervin A, Wallwork B. Efficacy and safety of
long-term antibiotics (macrolides) for the
treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis. Curr Allergy
Asthma Rep. 2014;14(3):416.

81. Huck W, Reed BD, Nielsen RW, et al. Cefaclor vs


amoxicillin in the treatment of acute, recurrent, and
chronic sinusitis. Arch Fam Med. 1993;2(5):497-503.

98. Patel AM, Shariff S, Bailey DG, et al. Statin


toxicity from macrolide antibiotic coprescription:
a population-based cohort study. Ann Intern Med.
2013;158(12):869-876.

82. Reiter J, Demirel N, Mendy A, et al. Macrolides


for the long-term management of asthmaa
meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Allergy.
2013;68(8):1040-1049.

99. Ray WA, Murray KT, Hall K, Arbogast PG, Stein


CM. Azithromycin and the risk of cardiovascular
death. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(20):1881-1890.

83. Harvey RJ, Wallwork BD, Lund VJ.


Anti-inflammatory effects of macrolides:
applications in chronic rhinosinusitis. Immunol
Allergy Clin North Am. 2009;29(4):689-703.
84. Soler ZM, Smith TL. What is the role of
long-term macrolide therapy in the treatment of
recalcitrant chronic rhinosinusitis? Laryngoscope.
2009;119(11):2083-2084.

100. Westphal JF. Macrolideinduced clinically


relevant drug interactions with cytochrome P-450A
(CYP) 3A4: an update focused on clarithromycin,
azithromycin and dirithromycin. Br J Clin Pharmacol.
2000;50(4):285-295.
101. Yasui N, Otani K, Kaneko S, et al. A kinetic and
dynamic study of oral alprazolam with and without
erythromycin in humans: in vivo evidence for the
involvement of CYP3A4 in alprazolam metabolism.
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1996;59(5):514-519.

(Reprinted) JAMA September 1, 2015 Volume 314, Number 9

Copyright 2015 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.

Downloaded From: http://jama.jamanetwork.com/ by a Universidad Autonoma de Baja California User on 09/02/2015

939

Вам также может понравиться