Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Review
EVIDENCE REVIEW A systematic review searched Ovid MEDLINE (1947-January 30, 2015),
EMBASE, and Cochrane Databases. The search was limited to randomized clinical trials
(RCTs), systematic reviews, and meta-analyses. Evidence was categorized into maintenance
and intermittent or rescue therapies and reported based on the presence or absence of nasal
polyps.
FINDINGS Twenty-nine studies met inclusion criteria: 12 meta-analyses (>60 RCTs), 13
systematic reviews, and 4 RCTs that were not included in any of the meta-analyses. Saline
irrigation improved symptom scores compared with no treatment (standardized mean
difference [SMD], 1.42 [95% CI, 1.01 to 1.84]; a positive SMD indicates improvement). Topical
corticosteroid therapy improved overall symptom scores (SMD, 0.46 [95% CI, 0.65 to
0.27]; a negative SMD indicates improvement), improved polyp scores (SMD, 0.73 [95%
CI, 1.0 to 0.46]; a negative SMD indicates improvement), and reduced polyp recurrence
after surgery (relative risk, 0.59 [95% CI, 0.45 to 0.79]). Systemic corticosteroids and oral
doxycycline (both for 3 weeks) reduced polyp size compared with placebo for 3 months after
treatment (P < .001). Leukotriene antagonists improved nasal symptoms compared with
placebo in patients with nasal polyps (P < .01). Macrolide antibiotic for 3 months was
associated with improved QOL at a single time point (24 weeks after therapy) compared with
placebo for patients without polyps (SMD, 0.43 [95% CI, 0.82 to 0.05]).
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Evidence supports daily high-volume saline irrigation with
topical corticosteroid therapy as a first-line therapy for chronic sinusitis. A short course of
systemic corticosteroids (1-3 weeks), short course of doxycycline (3 weeks), or a leukotriene
antagonist may be considered in patients with nasal polyps. A prolonged course (3 months)
of macrolide antibiotic may be considered for patients without polyps.
hronic sinusitis, or chronic rhinosinusitis, is an inflammatory condition defined by symptomatic inflammation of the
paranasal sinuses lasting longer than 3 months (Box 1).1-3
Common presenting symptoms include nasal obstruction, facial pressure or fullness, nasal discharge (anterior or posterior), and olfactory
loss (Table 1).4-7 Furthermore, chronic sinusitis is associated with reductions in patient quality of
IL-5 interleukin 5
life (QOL),8 sleep quality,9
and daily productivity.10 It is
QOL quality of life
a common yet underrecogRCT randomized clinical trial
nized chronic inflammatory
disease affecting approximately 3% to 7% of the population11,12 and
accounting for 1% to 2% of total physician visits.13,14 Health care expenditures related to chronic sinusitis exceed $9 billion per year with
societal costs exceeding $13 billion per year.15
Although previously thought to be entirely infectious in etiology, chronic sinusitis is now recognized as an inflammatory disease
of the upper airways analogous to asthma in the lower airways.16,17
The etiology is multifactorial16,18 and includes bacterial superantigens, epithelial cell defects, bacterial biofilms, T helper 1 and 2 inflammation, tissue remodeling19 (increased fibrosis of sinonasal mucosa), and genetic variations in human leukocyte antigen haplotypes
and bitter-taste receptors. For example, healthy sinonasal-ciliated
epithelial cells express bitter-taste receptors, which are stimulated
by bacterial products and activate an innate host immune response to remove and kill bacteria by locally releasing nitric oxide.20,21
Genetic variations in bitter-taste receptors have been associated with
refractory chronic sinusitis and may represent a novel future therapeutic target.22,23
Similar to asthma, current research focuses on categorizing
chronic sinusitis into chronic sinusitis endotypes,24 which are disease classifications defined by distinct clinical features, pathophysiologic molecular mechanisms, and treatment responses.25,26 However, validated chronic sinusitis endotypes have not been defined.
Therefore, chronic sinusitis is currently classified based on the presence or absence of nasal polyps.
Medical treatments for chronic sinusitis reduce mucosal inflammation, remove mucus, and modulate environmental triggers
(Figure 1).30 This systematic review identifies the most effective
treatments for the medical management of adult chronic sinusitis
and presents the evidence supporting each therapeutic option.
Methods
Ovid MEDLINE (1947-January 30, 2015), EMBASE, the Cochrane Central register of Controlled Trials, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were searched using the terms: chronic, *sinusitis
(using * as an unlimited truncation strategy to capture all variations
of sinusitis). The results were combined with the following chronic
sinusitis medical therapy terms: saline, antibiotic, antimicrobial, corticosteroid, steroid, antifungal, leukotriene receptor antagonist, antihistamine, immunotherapy, omalizumab, anti-IL5, macrolide. The
following search limits were then applied: randomized clinical trials
(RCTs) of humans 18 years or older, systematic reviews, and metaanalyses. Inclusion criteria required that all patients in each study
were considered to have chronic sinusitis, although diagnostic criteria were allowed to vary across individual studies. Studies were exjama.com
cluded if they focused on perioperative medications, acute sinusitis, allergic fungal sinusitis, cystic fibrosis, primary ciliary dyskinesia,
aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease, sarcoidosis, immunodeficiency, or granulomatosis with polyangiitis. Unstructured narrative
reviews were excluded. References from all identified studies were
reviewed for additional relevant articles.
Both authors independently reviewed included studies and assigned a level of evidence31 for each study. When applicable, the
quantitative effect size and confidence interval from metaanalyses and RCTs were reported. The standardized mean difference (SMD) was used to report effect size from a meta-analysis when
studies reported outcomes using different instruments. When improvement was associated with higher scores on the outcome measure, then the SMD would be greater than 0. If improvement was
associated with lower scores on the outcome measure (ie, polyp
scores), then the SMD would be less than 0. An aggregate grade of
evidence (A-C) and recommendation (I-III) for each treatment strategy was assigned using the American Heart Association grading scale
(Box 2).32 Differences in evidence grading were resolved by discussion. The risk of bias for each meta-analysis was quantified using the
Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions.33
Results
Three hundred twenty-eight studies were screened for eligibility.
Twenty-nine studies met inclusion criteria, including 12 metaanalyses (evaluating >60 RCTs), 13 systematic reviews, and 4 individual RCTs that were not included in any of the meta-analyses (eFigure in the Supplement). The evidence for each treatment strategy
is organized into either maintenance or intermittent or rescue
therapies, with the understanding that these designations are not
necessarily mutually exclusive in clinical practice.
927
Pressure/pain (facial)
Obstruction (nasal)
Discharge (nasal)anterior or posterior
Smell reduced
Symptom Criteria Supported by Demonstrating at Least 1 of the
Following 3 Objective Signs of Inflammation
Presenting Symptom
Frequency of Presenting
Symptom, %
Sinonasal-specific
Nasal obstruction/congestion
81-95
Nasal discharge
81-93
Facial pressure/fullness
70-85
66-84
Other
Fatigue
83-92
Headache
73-83
Difficulty sleeping
62-74
Toothache
30-67
Ear pain/fullness
39-56
out nasal polyposis. Although early evidence suggests that highvolume corticosteroid irrigations (ie, techniques that involve delivering >100 mL of solution into the nasal cavity46) (eg, budesonide
irrigations47) are more effective than low-volume corticosteroid spray
techniques (ie, meter-dosed spray, atomized, or nebulized
solutions),46 clinical trials are required before a recommendation on
optimal delivery method can be provided. Doses, durations, and potential adverse effects of available medical therapies are reported
in Table 3.
Saline Irrigations
Sinonasal saline irrigations assist in removing mucus and possible environmental triggers and assist in restoring normal mucociliary clearance. Outcomes from 2 systematic reviews 41,42 and 1 metaanalysis (399 patients)40 support an association between the use
of sinonasal saline irrigations and improved symptom scores
(Table 2). However, when saline irrigation was the only treatment,
it was associated with less improvement when directly compared
with topical corticosteroid therapy.
In summary, an A-I grade and recommendation supports using
sinonasal saline irrigation as an adjunctive therapy to intranasal corticosteroids for patients with and without nasal polyps. Isotonic and
hypertonic saline irrigations provide similar symptom improvement. High-volume (>100 mL) saline irrigation is superior to lowvolume nasal saline spray techniques.46,48
Patients commonly present with severe nasal polyposis or acute inflammatory exacerbations requiring intermittent or rescue systemic corticosteroid to treat acute mucosal inflammation.30 Three
systematic reviews evaluated oral corticosteroids for nasal polyposis (Table 4).58-60 Oral corticosteroids were associated with improved symptoms, QOL, and reduced polyp size compared with placebo in all 5 RCTs. However, the RCTs were of low to moderate quality,
short duration (2-3 weeks), and limited follow-up (2 weeks-6
months). Improvements were not sustained for more than 3 months
in the absence of maintenance topical corticosteroid therapy.45,73
No RCTs evaluated oral corticosteroids for chronic sinusitis without nasal polyps. The highest level of evidence for patients without
jama.com
Respiratory pathogens
Nonmacrolide antibiotics
Macrolides
Clears respiratory
pathogens and allergens
Increases ciliary clearance
Respiratory
pathogen
Increase ciliary
clearance
NASAL MUCOSA
Cell membrane
phospholipid
SUBEPITHELIAL
MAST CELL
RESPIRATORY
EPITHELIAL CELL
Antigenpresenting
cell
Epithelial cell
Phospholipase A2
Corticosteroids
Macrolides
Activation of
NF-B pathway
Environmental
allergens
Saline irrigation
Corticosteroids
Inhibit NF-B
pathway
Arachidonic acid
Inhibit arachidonic
acid synthesis
Antigenpresenting
cell
TH 2-cell
activation
NF-B
5-LO
Leukotriene
synthesis
5-LO inhibitors
NF-B
Block leukotriene
synthesis
Release of
inflammatory
mediators
Release of
inflammatory
mediators
Leukotrienes
TGF-
Block binding to
TGF- receptor
Neutrophil
activation
TNF-
Doxycycline
Blocks IL-6,
IL-8, TNF-
IL-4
IL-13
Eosinophil
migration and
activation
B-cell
activation
IL-6
IL-8
GM-CSF
IL-5
Mepolizumab
IL-2
Macrolides
TH2 cell
Recruitment of
inflammatory
cells
Leukotriene receptor
antagonists
Block cysteinyl
leukotriene receptor
binding
B cell
Eosinophil
Synthesis and
release of IgE
Neutrophil
Eosinophil
Monocyte
Neutrophil
Macrolides
Inhibit neutrophil
migration
Promote neutrophil
apoptosis
Neutrophil
IL-8
Leukotriene B4
IgE
Neutrophil migration
Release of proteases
and superoxides
Neutrophil
Eosinophil
Cysteinyl leukotriene
receptors 1 and 2
Omalizumab
Binds free IgE
Histamine release
and mast cell
migration
Antihistamine
Blocks histamine
release from
mast cells
Apoptotic
neutrophil
Mast cell
Neutrophil
Histamine
Leukotrienes
Other cytokines
GM-CSF indicates granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor; IL, interleukin; LO, lipoxygenase; NF-B, nuclear factor enhancer of B cells;
TGF, transforming growth factor; TH2, T helper 2; TNF, tumor necrosis factor.
jama.com
929
Anti-IgE Therapy
Anti-IgE therapy involves delivery of a recombinant DNA-derived humanized IgG monoclonal antibody that binds free IgE and inhibits
binding to mast cell and basophil receptors.87 However, the influence of IgE-mediated inflammation on the underlying pathophysiology of chronic sinusitis is unclear.88
Two RCTs64,65 that evaluated anti-IgE monoclonal antibody included patients with serum IgE levels from 15 kU/mL through
700 kU/mL and compared omalizumab (0.016 mg/kg per IU total
jama.com
Thus, this review placed a B-III grade of evidence and recommendation against the use of long-term macrolide for nasal polyposis. This is
in contrast to a C grade of evidence and recommendation for its use in
patients with nasal polyps by the European and British guidelines.
This review has limitations. First, the quality of included studies used to generate evidence-based conclusions was limited. Several medical therapies lacked level 1 evidence and several RCTs contained moderate to high risk of bias (eTable 2 in the Supplement).
Second, some studies used different diagnostic criteria for chronic
sinusitis and included mixed cohorts of sinusitis patients (eg, with
and without nasal polyps), limiting the ability to make specific conclusions. Third, some of the meta-analyses included the same RCTs
(ie, a RCT may be included in more than 1 meta-analysis).
ARTICLE INFORMATION
Author Contributions: Drs Rudmik and Soler had
full access to all of the data in the study and take
responsibility for the integrity of the data and the
accuracy of the data analysis.
Study concept and design: All authors.
Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: All
authors.
Drafting of the manuscript: All authors.
Critical revision of the manuscript for important
intellectual content: All authors.
Administrative, technical, or material support: All
authors.
Study supervision: Rudmik.
Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Both authors
have completed and submitted the ICMJE Form for
jama.com
Future Directions
Given the high prevalence and large economic burden of chronic
sinusitis,15 future research should improve the quality of evidence
for individual therapies and validate treatment pathways to optimize the quality of care. Furthermore, the studies included in this
review considered chronic sinusitis as a single clinical entity with subgroups defined only by polyp status. Future research should develop personalized therapies that target precise features of the patients abnormal immune-environment interaction to maximally
improve outcomes.
Conclusion
Evidence supports daily high-volume saline irrigation with topical corticosteroid therapy as a first-line therapy for chronic sinusitis. A short
course of systemic corticosteroids (1-3 weeks), short course of doxycycline (3 weeks), or a leukotriene antagonist may be considered in
patients with nasal polyps. A prolonged course (3 months) of macrolide antibiotic may be considered for patients without polyps.
937
938
jama.com
jama.com
Study Design
(LOEa)
Systematic review
(2a)
Systematic review
(2a)
Meta-analysis (1a)
Pynnonen et al,63
2013
RCT (2b)
RCT (2b)
RCT (2b)
RCT (2b)
Immunomodulation
Systematic review
(3a)
Piromchai et al,62
2011
Long-term Antibiotics
Systematic review
(2a)
Systematic review
(3a)
Short-term Antibiotics
Systematic review
(2a)
Martinez-Devesa and
Patiar,58 2011
Systemic Corticosteroids
Source
NA
Sample Size
NA
NA
NA
2 (1b)
2 (1b)
1 (1b)
4 (1b) and
2 (4)
5 (2b), 2 (3b),
and 11 (4)
30 patients
24 patients
24 patients
14 patients
124 patients
NA
NA
NA
NA
3 (2b)
No. of Studies
(LOEa)
Nasal polyps
Nasal polyps
Nasal polyps
Nasal polyps
no polyps; mixed
polyp groups
No polyps
No polyps
Nasal polyps
Population
Treated
Table 4. Highest-Level Evidence for Intermittent or Rescue Therapies for Chronic Sinusitis
Anti-IL-5 (mepolizumab
750 mg for 2 doses 28 d apart)
vs placebo
Anti-IL-5 (reslizumab 1 or
3 mg/kg single infusion) vs
placebo
Anti-IgE (omalizumab
0.016 mg/kg per IU total serum
IgE/mL monthly for 6 mo) vs
placebo
Study Groups
QOL
Symptom, radiographic,
endoscopy, and nasal
secretions
(continued)
Conclusions
933
934
Systematic review
(2a)
Systematic review
(2a)
Systematic review
(2a)
Meta-analysis (1a)
Meta-analysis (1a)
5 (1b)
3 (1b) and
3 (2b)
2 (2b)
2 (1b), 1 (2b),
2 (2c), and
4 (4)
2 (1b), 1 (2b),
1 (2c), 2 (3a),
and 4 (4)
5 (2b), 2 (3b),
and 7 (4)
No. of Studies
(LOEa)
300 patients
327 patients
284 patients
NA
NA
NA
NA
Sample Size
Topical
amphotericin B
vs placebo
Topical
amphotericin B
vs placebo
Topical
amphotericin B
vs placebo
No polyps
No polyps
No polyps
No polyps
Population
Treated
No polyps
No polyps
No polyps
Symptom, QOL,
and adverse effects
Symptom, endoscopy,
and radiologic
Symptom, QOL,
and endoscopy
Symptom, QOL,
and endoscopy
Conclusions
Level of evidence scale was from the Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine.31
Fosfomycin, N-chlorotaurine,
bacitracin, tobramycin,
mupirocin, and neomycin
Neomycin, tobramycin-saline,
bacitracin, gentamycin, and
mupirocin
Neomycin, tobramycin,
ceftazidime, N-chlorotaurine,
dibekacin, fosfomycin,
mupirocin, and amphotericin B
Study Groups
Abbreviations: CT, computed tomography; IL, interleukin; INS, intranasal steroid; LOE, level of evidence; NA, not
applicable; QOL, quality of life; RCT, randomized clinical trial; SMD, standardized mean difference.
Meta-analysis (1a)
Topical Antifungals
Systematic review
(2a)
Study Design
(LOEa)
Topical Antibiotics
Source
Table 4. Highest-Level Evidence for Intermittent or Rescue Therapies for Chronic Sinusitis (continued)
jama.com
Table 5. Comparison of Guideline Recommendations for Medical Therapies in the Management of Chronic Sinusitis
Recommendation Levela
Grade of Evidence and
Recommendation: Current Review
Canadian Sinusitis
Guidelines 20111
Nasal Polyps
No Polyps
Maintenance Therapies
Topical corticosteroid
A-I
A-I
++
++
++
++
++
++
Saline irrigations
A-I
A-I
++
++
++
LTA
A-II
None
None
None
NE
Systemic antihistamineb
None
None
None
None
++
++
Allergy immunotherapy
C-II
C-II
None
None
NE
NE
A-I
C-II
++
++
++
Short-term antibiotic
B-Ic
A-II
Long-term macrolide
B-III
A-II
++
A-II
None
None
NE
NE
NE
NE
A-II
None
None
NE
NE
NE
NE
Topical antibiotic
None
A-III
None
NE
NE
Topical antifungal
None
A-III
None
NE
NE
serum IgE/mL; max dose of 375 mg) to placebo (Table 4). Both studies lacked statistical power and contained moderate estimates of bias
making it challenging to draw definitive conclusions from the reported associations between improved radiologic (ie, computerized tomography scan) and polyp scores at 16 weeks of omalizumab compared with placebo.
In summary, an A-II grade and recommendation is designated
to anti-IgE therapy for chronic sinusitis with nasal polyposis and
asthma. No evidence grade and recommendation is assigned for antiIgE therapy for patients without nasal polyps.
AntiInterleukin 5 Therapy
Anti-interleukin 5 (IL-5) therapy involves delivering a humanized
IgG monoclonal antibody that binds free IL-5 and impairs
eosinophilic-mediated inflammation.89 Two RCTs evaluated antiIL-5 therapy (reslizumab and mepolizumab) for nasal polyposis
(Table 4).66,67 Both studies were small (n 30), lacked long-term
follow-up, and contained moderate to high estimates of bias.
Reslizumab (1 or 3 mg/kg) did not improve symptom scores compared with placebo but slightly reduced blood eosinophil levels.
Mepolizumab (2 injections of 750 mg received 28 days apart) was
associated with improved polyp scores in approximately 50% of
patients compared with placebo but the study did not evaluate
patient-reported outcomes.
In summary, an A-II grade and recommendation is designated
for anti-IL-5 monoclonal antibody therapy in patients with nasal polyposis. No grade of evidence or recommendation is assigned for antiIL-5 therapy for patients without nasal polyps.
jama.com
Topical Antibacterials
Four systematic reviews41,61,68,69 evaluated topical antibiotics for
chronic sinusitis without nasal polyps (Table 4). All RCTs contained
small sample sizes, evaluated different topical antibiotics, and used
different application techniques. Three RCTs demonstrated no difference in clinical outcomes compared with placebo. One RCT demonstrated improved short-term symptom improvement using a highvolume (240 mL divided between 2 nasal cavities) mupirocin
irrigation compared with placebo in a specific cohort of patients with
a sinus culture positive for Staphylococcus aureus.90 There was no
difference in sinus-specific QOL with mupirocin irrigation compared with placebo.
In summary, the routine use of topical antibiotics during the management of chronic sinusitis without nasal polyps is not recommended and has an A-III grade designation. High-volume topical mupirocin irrigations may be appropriate therapy in select cases of
recalcitrant disease with a sinus culture positive for S aureus. No grade
of evidence or recommendation is designated for the use of topical
antibiotics for nasal polyposis.
Topical Antifungals
Fungi colonize the nasal mucosa in 96% of both chronic sinusitis
patients and healthy controls.91,92 This created a hypothesis that
an abnormal immunological response to fungi may cause chronic
sinusitis and eradication of fungi may resolve sinus disease.93,94
Topical amphotericin B binds ergosterol (a component of the fungal cell membrane) and creates a transmembrane ion channel
leading to fungal death.
(Reprinted) JAMA September 1, 2015 Volume 314, Number 9
935
No
Yes
Short-course antibiotic
Culture-directed or broad
spectrum when indicated
Reassess in 1 to 3 months
Persistent symptomsa
or acute exacerbation
Continue treatment
Yes
No
14-21 days
Prednisone 30-50 mg daily (taper when indicated)
Prednisolone 20-60 mg daily (taper when indicated)
Consider
Short course of doxycycline 200 mg once followed
by 100 mg daily for 21 days
Culture-directed antibiotic (in the presence
of mucopurulent discharge on examination)
Persistent symptomsa
No
Continue treatment
Yes
Does patient have concurrent
allergic rhinitis?
No
Yes
Consider
Systemic antihistamine
Leukotriene pathway antagonist
Allergy immunotherapy
Three meta-analyses (327 patients)70-72 demonstrated no benefitoftopicalamphotericinBcomparedwithplaceboforpatientswithout nasal polyps. Therefore, use of topical antifungals for chronic sinusitis without nasal polyps is not recommended and has an A-III grade
designation. No grade of evidence can be made for nasal polyposis.
Discussion
Basedonavailableevidence,medicaltherapyforchronicsinusitisshould
begin with daily application of a topical intranasal corticosteroid in conjunction with high-volume saline irrigation. Subsequent therapies are
based on the patients polyp status and severity of symptoms or QOL
impairment. Although there have been several published guidelines
evaluating adult chronic sinusitis,1-3,95 only 3 include specific treatment
936
recommendations.1,2,95 Table 5 summarizes the overall grades of evidence from this review and how they compare with published guidelines from Europe, Canada, and the United Kingdom.
First, there were differences regarding use of leukotriene antagonists for treating nasal polyposis. The outcomes from 2 RCTs
evaluating leukotriene antagonists demonstrated mixed results;
therefore, available evidence is consistent with an A-II grade of evidence and recommendation. This differs from the A grade of evidence and recommendation against the use of leukotriene antagonists (ie, equivalent to an A-III grade) to treat nasal polyposis made
in the European guidelines.
Second, there were differences pertaining to the use of long-term
macrolide therapy in patients with nasal polyps. The only RCT evaluating long-term macrolide therapy, which included patients with nasal polyposis, demonstrated no difference compared with placebo.
jama.com
Thus, this review placed a B-III grade of evidence and recommendation against the use of long-term macrolide for nasal polyposis. This is
in contrast to a C grade of evidence and recommendation for its use in
patients with nasal polyps by the European and British guidelines.
This review has limitations. First, the quality of included studies used to generate evidence-based conclusions was limited. Several medical therapies lacked level 1 evidence and several RCTs contained moderate to high risk of bias (eTable 2 in the Supplement).
Second, some studies used different diagnostic criteria for chronic
sinusitis and included mixed cohorts of sinusitis patients (eg, with
and without nasal polyps), limiting the ability to make specific conclusions. Third, some of the meta-analyses included the same RCTs
(ie, a RCT may be included in more than 1 meta-analysis).
ARTICLE INFORMATION
Author Contributions: Drs Rudmik and Soler had
full access to all of the data in the study and take
responsibility for the integrity of the data and the
accuracy of the data analysis.
Study concept and design: All authors.
Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: All
authors.
Drafting of the manuscript: All authors.
Critical revision of the manuscript for important
intellectual content: All authors.
Administrative, technical, or material support: All
authors.
Study supervision: Rudmik.
Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Both authors
have completed and submitted the ICMJE Form for
jama.com
Future Directions
Given the high prevalence and large economic burden of chronic
sinusitis,15 future research should improve the quality of evidence
for individual therapies and validate treatment pathways to optimize the quality of care. Furthermore, the studies included in this
review considered chronic sinusitis as a single clinical entity with subgroups defined only by polyp status. Future research should develop personalized therapies that target precise features of the patients abnormal immune-environment interaction to maximally
improve outcomes.
Conclusion
Evidence supports daily high-volume saline irrigation with topical corticosteroid therapy as a first-line therapy for chronic sinusitis. A short
course of systemic corticosteroids (1-3 weeks), short course of doxycycline (3 weeks), or a leukotriene antagonist may be considered in
patients with nasal polyps. A prolonged course (3 months) of macrolide antibiotic may be considered for patients without polyps.
937
938
jama.com
jama.com
939