Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
INTRODUCTION
Accounts receivable is one of the company's
business activities that occur due to the
selling of credit. With the credit sales
(receivables), the company needs to do a
receivables management company. The
company's profit is the goal of every
company, for the company to be able to
manage their receivables properly and
efficiently so that the company can realized.
Company profits can be attributed to an
increase in the company's performance in the
utilization of assets owned by the company.
(Edhi Asmirantho, 2013)
Accounts Receivable is a bill or to other
parties as a result of credit sales. The
extension of credit is one of proportion
because it is one of the important proportion,
because it is part of a large company assets,
therefore the success of a company is not
free from interference management, because
management is part of the company
associated with the activity of the company.
(Sutrisno, 2007) Receivables Management
are receivables management in order to
achieve optimal credit policy, which is to
achieve a balance between the costs caused
by the credit policy with the benefits of the
policy. (Martono and Agus Harjito, 2010).
According Keown and Martin (2005)
Accounts receivable is something that is very
closely related to financial activities, because
at the time the company do credit sales it will
bring the trade receivables. These receivables
are recorded in current assets, accounts
receivable very dominating average in
current assets, is extremely important for
companies managing accounts receivable
management
efficiently
because
it
determines the profitability and liquidity.
Objects used in this study are the three basic
and chemical industry companies fodder
subsectors listed on the Stock Exchange,
namely PT. Charoen Pokphand Indonesia
Tbk, PT. Japfa Comfeed Indonesia Tbk and
PT. Sierad Produce Tbk. The reason the
researchers chose the object that companies
each seen the average age of accounts
receivable owned by the company has a long
period of time, among others, 90 days, 120
days and 180 days, and the Company was
selected based on the IPO before 2000 and
after years of 1990.Data complete finance for
10 years in the period 2004-2013.
2.
Profitability
Ratio
Analysis
Profitability ratio is the ratio to measure the
effectiveness of the overall management
addressed by the size of the level of profits in
connection with the sale or investment. The
better the profitability ratio, the better the
condition of the ability of the high profitability
of the company. (Edhi Asmirantho, 2013.) The
calculation of profitability ratios one of them
using the ROI are:
Return
a.
b.
ReceivableTurnover(RTO)
Receivable
Turnover
360
Receivable Turnover
in
Days(RTD)
c.
Sales
Total Asset
on
Investment
(ROI)
100%
Turnover
360
Receivable Turnover
in
Days
(RTD)=
Sales
Total Asset
b. Aging Schedule
Aging Schedule can be used to assess both
the composition of the receivables of the
company, this will give you an idea of the
proportion of each account for a certain
period. The existence of aging schedule
information will signify or can know how
many accounts are still in a period of
payment and receivables which are already
run through the payment period and the need
to take action and serious policy that needs to
be done company.
c.
Return
on
Investment
(ROI)
Return on Investment is a ratio that describes
and provides financial forecasting how much
is going on in a company. This ratio also
gives an idea of the level of enterprise
management capabilities to manage the fund
companies beginning and end of the period.
The higher the rate of return on investment
(ROI) of a company the better the state of the
company managing investment companies
on
Investment
(ROI)
100%
b) t test (Partial)
T test is used to determine whether partially
independent variables significantly influence
or not on the dependent variable to test using
a significance level of 0.05 and 2 sides.
RESEARCH RESULT
Receivables Management Company and
Chemical Industry Association Sub Sector
Feed
Recordable
in
BEI
Conditions of receivables management
companies are known from the calculation of
the ratio known that Receivable Turnover
and Receivable Turnover in Days for all
companies in the period 2004-2013 fluctuate
and increase slowly. Also note to PT.
Charoen Pokphand Indonesia Tbk (CPIN),
PT. Japfa Comfeed Indonesia Tbk (JAPFA),
and PT. Sierad Produce Tbk (SIPD) has an
average value that is below the average. This
is due to less efficient companies in the
billing process on a few customers who have
difficulty in paying debts and cash sales
higher than credit sales (receivables). Total
Asset Turnover for each year has increased
and fluctuated in the period 2004-2013 the
N
Normal Parametersa,b
Most Extreme
Differences
Mean
Std. Deviation
Absolute
Positive
Negative
Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed)
Unstandardized
Residual
30
0E-7
7.39652651
.085
.085
-.042
.466
.982
Based on the output table One Sample Kolmogorov Sminnov Test be discovered significance
value (Asymp.Sig 2-tailed) of 0.982 is greater than the significance level of 0.05 (0.982> 0.05),
then the residuals normally distributed
Coefficientsa
Model
Unstandardized
Coefficients
B
(Constant)
RTO
Standardized
Coefficients
Std. Error
-55.411
.655
18.130
.399
.479
RTD
TATO
21.534
a. Dependent Variable: ROI
Sig.
Beta
Collinearity Statistics
Tolerance
VIF
.380
-3.056
1.642
.005
.113
.220
4.536
.309
.405
1.547
.134
.173
5.797
3.303
.905
6.520
.000
.612
1.634
Coefficientsa
Unstandardized
Standardized
Coefficients
Coefficients
B
Std. Error
Beta
12.622
10.591
-.322
.233
-.537
-.179
.181
-.436
1.630
1.929
.197
Model
(Constant)
RTO
RTD
TATO
1.
Sig.
1.192
-1.381
-.992
.845
.244
.179
.330
.406
Model
.892a
R Square
.796
Model Summaryb
Adjusted R
Std. Error of the
Square
Estimate
.762
6.63087
Durbin-Watson
1.898
Autocorrelation test results in the table, note the value of the Durbin-Watson at 1,898. DU and
DL values can be obtained from the Durbin-Watson statistic table. With n = 30, and k = 3, the
obtained values and DL DU = 1.6498 = 1.2138. So the value obtained 4-DU = 2.3502 and 4-DL
value = 2.7862. Because the value of DU <DW <4-DU = 1.6498 <1.898 <2.3502, it can be
concluded there is no autocorrelation in the regression model.
Regression Test
Model
1
R
R Square
a
.833
.693
Model Summaryb
Adjusted R Square
Std. Error of the Estimate
.658
7.81160
a) Figures R obtained is 0,833 which means the correlation between the RTO, RTD and TATO to
the ROI of 0,833 or 83.3% .b) R Square (R) the percentage contribution of variables influence
the RTO, RTD and TATO on the ROI of 69.3% .c) adjusted R Square, is the R Square that has
been adjusted, a value of 0.658 or 65.8%. d) Standard Error of the Estimate, is a measure of
prediction error, a value of 7.81160. This means that errors can occur in predicting the Return On
Investment by 7.81160.
Hypothesis Testing
(1) F test
ANOVAa
Model
1
Sum of Squares
Df
Mean Square
Regression
3584.178
1194.726
Residual
Total
1586.550
5170.728
26
29
61.021
F
19.579
Sig.
.000b
F-test or test regression coefficients together. F test is used to determine whether jointly
independent variables have a significant effect on the dependent variable. 4:12 of the output
table. obtained F count equal to 19.579. F table can be seen in the statistics table F distribution at
a significance level of 0.05 with 1 df (variable number-1) = 3, and df 2 (nk-1) or 30-3-1 = 26 (n is
the number of data and k is the number of independent variables), the results obtained for the F
table by 2.98. Because the results of the F count> F table (19.579> 2.975), then Ho is rejected. So
it can be concluded that the Receivable Turnover, Receivable Turnover in Days and Total Asset
Turnover jointly significant effect on Return on Investment.
(2) t test
Model
(Constant)
RTO
RTD
TATO
Coefficientsa
Unstandardized Coefficients
Standardized Coefficients
B
Std. Error
Beta
-55.411
18.130
.655
.399
.380
.479
.309
.405
21.534
3.303
.905
t
-3.056
1.642
1.547
6.520
Sig.
.005
.113
.134
.000
a) the value of t for Receivable Turnover was 1,642. Because the value of t <t table (1.642
<2.056), then Ho is accepted. So it can be concluded that the partial Receivable Turnover is not
positive and significant effect on Return on Investment. b) the value of t for Receivable Turnover
in Days is 1.547 Because the value of t <t table (1.547 <2.056), then Ho is accepted. So it can be
concluded that the Receivable Turnover in Days is partially not positive and not significant to the
Return on Investment.c) t value for Total Asset Turnover was 6.520. Because the value of t> t
table (6.520> 2.056), then Ho is rejected. So it can be concluded that the Total Asset Turnover
partially positive and significant effect on Return on Investment.
Asmirantho
(2013),
Financial
Management, Learning Books, Pakuan
University.
Receivable
Turnover
Receivable
Collection Period To Profitability In
Finance Company. e-Journal Bhishma
Ganesha University of Education
Department of Management (Volume 2
2014).
Lutvianty K. Napu. (2013), Effect Against
Receivables Turnover Profitability In
Property Company Listed on the Stock
Exchange, Faculty of Economics and
Business,
State
University
of
Gorontalo.
Martono and Agus Harjito (2010),
Financial Management. Eighth
mold, Ekonosia. Jakarta.
Munawir (2010), Financial Statement
Analysis, Prints Fifteenth, Liberty,
Yogyakarta