Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
2015-2016
http://www.ca7.uscourts.gov/ftips/type.pdf
Research:
Etymology of attorney; to attorn
Difference between the ff.: (Attorney, Barrister, Solicitor)
Origin of the word abogado
Origin of the phrase take up the cudgels
Exceptions:
Rule 138, Sec. 34
Rule 115, Sec 1 (c)
Canon 6
Vitriolo v. Dasig, 400 SCRA 172 (2003)
People v. Pineda, 20 SCRA 748 (1967)
Collantes vs Romeren 200 SCRA 584 (1991)
Huyssen vs Gutierrez 485 SCRA 244 (2006)
Misamin v. San Juan, 72 SCRA 491 (1976)
See also: RA 3019 or the Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act.
Sec. 3(d); RA 6713 7(b)
PCGG v. Sandiganbayan, 455 SCRA 526 (2005)
Canon 7
RA 6397
In re 1989 Elections of the IBP, 178 SCRA 398 (1989)
Santos v. Llamas, 322 SCRA 529 (2000)
Letter of Atty. Cecilio Arevalo, 458 SCRA 209 (2005)
Foodsphere v. Mauricio, A.C. No. 7199 (22 July 2009)
Young v. Batuegas, 403 SCRA 123 [2003]).
In re Parazo, 82 Phil. 230 [1948])
Zaguirre v. Castillo, 398 SCRA 659 [2003]:
Tapucar v. Tapucar, 293 SCRA 331 [1998]:
Canon 8
Camacho v. Pagulayan et al (A.C. No. 4807, March 22, 2000)
Reyes vs. Chiong, Jr., 405 SCRA 212 (2003)
Laput v. Remotigue A.M. No. 219 (1962)
Canon 9
Aguirre v. Rana 403 SCRA 342 (2003)
Alawi v. Alauya 268 SCRA 639 (1997)
Ulep v. Legal Clinic, Inc., 223 SCRA 378 (1993)
People v. Villanueva, 14 SCRA 109 (1965)
Rule 138, Sec. 1, Rules of Court
Aguirre v. Rana, 403 SCRA 342 (2003)
OCA v. Ladaga, 350 SCRA 326
Rule 138, Sec. 34, Rules of Court in relation to People v. Sin
Ben, 98 Phil. 138 (1955)
Guballa v. Caguioa, 78 SCRA 302
Eco v. Rodriguez, 107 Phil. 612 (1960)
Robinson v. Villafuerte, 18 Phil 121 (1911)
Amalgamated Laborers Assn. v. CIR. 22 SCRA 1266 (1968)
Tan Tek Beng v. David. 128 SCRA 389 (1983)
Halili v. CIR. 136 SCRA 113 (1965))
Five J Taxi v. NLRC, 235 SCRA 556
Duties of a lawyer
Rule 138, Sec. 20
Research: What are the four-fold duties of a lawyer
Canon 1
Canon 10
Cobb Perez v. Lantin, 24 SCRA 291 (1968)
Young v. Batuegas, 403 SCRA 123 (2003
COMELEC v. Noynay, 292 SCRA 254 (1992)
Rule 138, Sec. 20 (d) in relation to Garcia v. Francisco 220
SCRA 512 (1993)
Gomez v. Presiding Judge 249 SCRA 432
Canon 11
In re Sotto 82 Phil 595 (1949)
Canon 12
1987 Constitution, Art. III, Sec 6
Rule 138, Sec 20(g)
Villasis v. Court of Appeals, 60 SCRA 120
Supreme Court Circular No. 28-91
RULES OF COURT, RULE 7, SEC. 5:
Achacoso v. Court of Appeals, 51 SCRA 424, 1973
Manila Pest Control v. WCC, 25 SCRA 700 (1968)
Art. 184, Revised Penal Code
US v. Ballena, 18 Phil. 382
Rule 132, Sec. 3
PD1829-Penalizing Obstruction of Justice
PNB v. Uy Teng Piao, 57 Phil 337 (1932)
Canon 13
Austria v. Masaquel, 20 SCRA 1247(1967)
Nestle Phil. v. Sanchez 154 SCRA 542 (1987)
In re de Vera 385 SCRA 285 (2003)
Cruz v. Salva, 105 Phil 1151 (1951)
RE: Request Radio TV Coverage, A.M. No. 01-4-03-S.C. June
29, 2001
Magsalang v. People, G.R. No. 90083 October 4, 1990
Canon 14
Rule 138, Sec. 20 (i)
Rule 138, Sec. 20 (h)
Rule 138, Sec. 31
P.D. 543 (1974)
RA 6033
RA 6034
RA 6035
Ledesma v. Climaco, 57 SCRA 473 (1974)
Blanza v. Arcangel, 21 SCRA 1 (1967)
Also read Rule 2.02
Canon 15
Revised Penal Code, Art. 209.
Rule 130, Section 24 (b) of the RRC)
People v. Sandiganbayan, G.R. Nos. 115439-41. July 16, 1997
Regala v. Sandiganbayan, 262 SCRA 122 (1996)
Dee v. CA 176 SCRA 651(1989)
Nakpil v. Valdez, 286 SCRA 758 (1998)
Canon 16
Canon 17
Cantiller v. Potenciano, 180 SCRA 246 (1989)
Santiago v. Fojas, 248 SCRA 68 (1995)
Steimmark v. Mas AC No. 8010 (2009)
Canon 18
Islas v.Platon, 47 Phil. 162
Legarda v. CA, G. R. No. 94457, March 18, 1991
Uy v Tansinin [AC No. 8252 (July 21, 2009)
Garcia V. Bala [A.C. No. 5039(2005)].
Negligence of counsel
Mapua v.Mendoza, 45 Phil. 424(1993)
Filinvest Land v.CA, 182 SCRA 664(1990)
Joven-De Jesus v. PNB, 12 SCRA 447
People v. Cawili, 34 SCRA 728(1970)
Gaerlan v. Bernal, G.R. No.L-4049, Jan. 28, 1952
Agravante v. Patriarca, 183 SCRA 113(1990))
Ventura v.Santos, 59 Phil. 123(1993)
Canon 19
Rule 138, Sec. 20(d)
Rural Bank of Calape Inc. vs. Florido, A.C. No. 5736 June 18,
2010
Pena vs. Aparicio, A.C. No. 7298
Rule 138, Sec. 23
Millare vs. Montero, A.C. No. 3283 July 13, 1995
Canon 20
Rule 138, Sec. 23
Corpuz v. CA, G.R. No. L-40424, June 30, 1980
Albano v. Coloma, 21 SCRA 411 (1967)
Traders Royal Bank Employees Union-Independent v. NLRC,
G.R. No. 120592, March 14, 1997
Rule 138, Sec, 24
Definition of amicus curiae, counsel de parte, counsel de oficio
Rule 138, Sec. 32
Nocom vs. Camerino, et al., G.R. No. 182984 (February 10,
2009)
Canon 21
Rule 138, 20(e).
Rule 130, sec. 21(b).
Art. 209 Revised Penal Code.
Genato v. Silapan 453 Phil. 910 (2003)
Hilado v. David 83 Phil 569 (1949)
Canon 22
Montano vs. IBP 358 SCRA 1 (2001)
Obando vs. Figueras, 322 SCRA 148 (2000)
Liabilities of lawyers
Kinds of contempt, supra
Power to discipline errant lawyers
See
ROC Rule 138, S. 27
139-B, S. 16
Quingwa v. Puno, Admin. Case No. 398, Feb. 28, 1967
Amaya v. Tecson, 450 SCRA 510
Aquino v. Mangaoang, 425 SCRA 572
In Re: Ruste, 70 Phil 243
Reinstatement, basis - 1987 Constitution, Art. VIII, Sec. 5(5).
Cui v. Cui, 11 SCRA 755
In re: Adriatico, 17 Phil 324
Prudential Bank v. Benjamin Grecia, 192 SCRA 381
Yap Tan v. Sabandal, 170 SCRA 207
In re: Rusiana, 56 SCRA 240
In re: Rovero, 101 SCRA 803
The Judiciary
Code of Judicial Conduct
Bangalore Principles
http://www.coe.int/t/dghl/monitoring/greco/evaluations/rou
nd4/Bangalore_principles_EN.pdf
Qualifications
Sec. 7 (1), Art. VIII, 1987 Constitution
BP 129
Canon 1
OCA vs. Floro, A.M. No. RTJ-99-1460 March 31, 2006
People v. Veneracion, 249 SCRA 244
Go v. Court of Appeals, 206 SCRA 165
Tahil v. Eisma, 64 SCRA 378
Padilla v. Zantua, 237 SCRA 670
Re: Letter of Presiding Justice Conrado M. Vasquez, Jr. A.M.
No. 08-8- 11-CA
Tan v. Rosete, A.M. No. MTJ-04- 1563, September 8, 2004
Dimatulac et al v. Villon, 297 SCRA 679
Canon 2
Romero v. Valle, A.M. No. R-192-RTJ January 9, 1987
Castillo v. Calanog, A.M. No. RTJ-90-447 December 16, 1994
Macalintal v. Teh, 280 SCRA 623
Canon 3
Canon 4
Arban v. Borja, A.M. No R-281-RTJ August 26, 1986
Saburnido v. Madrono, Sept. 26, 2001
Sison v. Caoibes, Jr. A.M. No. RTJ-03-1771, May 27 2004
Ompoc vs. Judge Torres, A.M. No. MTJ-86-11, 17 Sept. 1989
Canon 5
In Re Judge Rojas, A.M. No. 98-6-185-RTC. October 30, 1998
In Re: Aguas, G.R. No. 12, August 8, 1901
Canon 6
Longboan v. Polig, A.M. No. 704-RTJ June 14, 1990
Abad v. Bleza A.M. No. 227-RTJ October 13, 1986
Maquiran v. Grageda, A.M. No. RTJ-04-1888. February 11,
2005
De la Cruz v. Pascua, A.M. No. RTJ-99-1461. June 26, 2001
Liabilities of Judges
Basis, 1987 Constitution, Art. VIII, Section 11
Raquiza vs. Castaneda, 82 SCRA 235