Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Correspondence
Our address: Letters to the Editor New England Journal of Medicine 10 Shattuck St. Boston, MA 02115
Our fax numbers: 617-739-9864 and 617-734-4457
Our e-mail address: letters@nejm.org
We cannot acknowledge receipt of your letter, but we will notify you when we have made a decision about publication. We are unable to
provide prepublication proofs. Please enclose a stamped, self-addressed envelope if you want unpublished material returned to you.
Financial associations or other possible conflicts of interest must be disclosed. Submission of a letter constitutes permission for the Massachusetts Medical Society, its licensees, and its assignees to use it in the Journal s various editions (print, data base, and optical disk) and in
anthologies, revisions, and any other form or medium.
Numb e r 5
369
The Ne w E n g l a nd Jo u r n a l o f Me d ic i ne
ing medical disaster in elderly and other vulnerable patients. Its onset should trigger a rapid and thorough search
for life-threatening medical illnesses that may have caused
it. In his classic studies of delirium, Lipowski found that
as many as one third of elderly patients who are hospitalized for medical reasons and in whom delirium develops
die within 30 days.2,3 The leading cause is infection, with
metabolic derangements and failures of other organ systems following close behind.4 As Eidelman et al. demonstrated in patients with sepsis, delirium is strongly associated with more severe disease and increased mortality
rates.5 Clearly, all patients should have the type of prophylactic interventions that Inouye et al. propose as part of
high-quality medical care. Nevertheless, when delirium
occurs, it should be treated as a potentially life-threatening
emergency.
CHARLES E. SCHWARTZ, M.D.
Montefiore Medical Center
Bronx, NY 10467
1. Rowe JW. Geriatrics, prevention, and the remodeling of Medicare.
N Engl J Med 1999;340:720-1.
2. Lipowski ZJ. Delirium in the elderly patient. N Engl J Med 1989;320:
578-82.
3. Idem. Transient cognitive disorders (delirium, acute confusional states)
in the elderly. Am J Psychiatry 1983;140:1426-36.
4. Wise MG, Lieberman JA III. Delirium, dementia, and amnestic disorders. In: Goldman LS, Wise TN, Brody DS, eds. Psychiatry for primary
care physicians. Chicago: American Medical Association, 1998:140.
5. Eidelman LA, Putterman D, Putterman C, Sprung CL. The spectrum
of septic encephalopathy: definitions, etiologies, and mortalities. JAMA
1996;275:470-3.
To the Editor: Behavioral interventions and environmental control are important in the management of delirium, as the study by Inouye et al. underscores. It is also
useful to prepare the family and the medical and surgical
staff for the likely emergence of delirium in high-risk patients. Delirium is very likely to occur in elderly patients
with dementia who are in pain and who are subjected to
surgery, sedation, and new surroundings, such as those
undergoing elective joint replacement. Families benefit
from knowing that delirium is a possibility and from understanding what delirium entails. There is an associated
risk of injury with delirium, of course, and this point
should really be brought out in the informed-consent
process. Metabolic encephalopathies in elderly patients
with some degree of cognitive impairment may take 6 to
12 weeks to resolve.
BRUCE D. SNYDER, M.D.
Minneapolis Clinic of Neurology
Golden Valley, MN 55422
370
To the Editor: Mortensen et al. (Feb. 25 issue)1 acknowledge that a family history of schizophrenia is the bestestablished risk factor for the disorder but suggest that environmental factors, including the place and season of birth,
are major determinants. This argument is based on estimates of the population attributable risk regarding factors
Jul y 2 9 , 19 9 9
The New England Journal of Medicine
Downloaded from nejm.org on November 1, 2015. For personal use only. No other uses without permission.
Copyright 1999 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.
70
RR=3.0
60
50
Institute of Psychiatry
London SE5 8AF, United Kingdom
RR=2.0
40
University of Virginia
Charlottesville, VA 22903
RR=1.5
30
20
10
0
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
1. Mortensen PB, Pedersen CB, Westergaard T, et al. Effects of family history and place and season of birth on the risk of schizophrenia. N Engl
J Med 1999;340:603-8.
2. Kramer MS. Clinical epidemiology and biostatistics: a primer for clinical
investigators and decision-makers. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag, 1988.
3. Cardno AG, Marshall EJ, Coid B, et al. Heritability estimates for psychotic disorders: the Maudsley twin psychosis series. Arch Gen Psychiatry
1999;56:162-8.
4. McGuffin P, Owen MJ, ODonovan MC, Thapar A, Gottesman II.
Seminars in psychiatric genetics. London: Gaskell, 1994.
found to be associated with schizophrenia in their population-based cohort. Unfortunately, their assertions about
the relative importance of various risk factors overlook the
fact that the calculation of population attributable risk is
dependent on the frequency of the risk factor in a population. The calculation of relative risk, however, is not dependent on the population base rate. Thus, for a given relative risk (RR), the population attributable risk can be
calculated with use of the following equation: population
attributable risk=P(RR1)P[(RR1)+1], where P is
the prevalence of the risk factor in the population.2
Figure 1 shows the curvilinear relation between the
population attributable risk and the prevalence of a risk
factor for three fixed relative risks and demonstrates that a
modest relative risk can correspond to a very high attributable risk if the risk factor is common.
Thus, although Mortensen and colleagues have provided us with an elegant set of epidemiologic data on schizophrenia, their interpretation of these data is questionable.
Their ability to replicate the associations between the season of birth, the place of birth, and schizophrenia is intriguing, but far from demonstrating that these are proxy
variables for major environmental factors, the findings
probably reveal that in Denmark, more people live in urban areas or are born in February or March than have a
first-degree relative with schizophrenia. The relative risk of
schizophrenia among the identical twins of patients with
schizophrenia is about 503,4 and is little changed in the
small sample of identical twins reared apart. The relative
risk among adopted children in Denmark with a biologic
parent with schizophrenia is about 10,4 which is well within the range reported1 for children reared in the same
household as an affected parent. Such findings seem to
Numb e r 5
371
The Ne w E n g l a nd Jo u r n a l o f Me d ic i ne
372
Jul y 2 9 , 19 9 9
The New England Journal of Medicine
Downloaded from nejm.org on November 1, 2015. For personal use only. No other uses without permission.
Copyright 1999 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.
Numb e r 5
373
The Ne w E n g l a nd Jo u r n a l o f Me d ic i ne
B
Figure 2. Tagged Cine MRI Images at End Diastole (Panel A) and
End Systole (Panel B).
Tagged grids with 8-mm-wide spacing that were generated at
end diastole (arrows in Panel A) remained unchanged at end
systole (arrows in Panel B), indicating tight adhesion between
the pericardium and the underlying myocardium.
RV
LV
374
Jul y 2 9 , 19 9 9
The New England Journal of Medicine
Downloaded from nejm.org on November 1, 2015. For personal use only. No other uses without permission.
Copyright 1999 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.
Figure 1. Slit-Lamp Photograph Showing a Tumor of the Corneoscleral Limbus in a 60-Year-Old Man Treated with Cyclosporine after Undergoing Heart Transplantation.
Hyper-IgE Syndrome
1
To the Editor: Grimbacher et al. (March 4 issue) described in detail 30 patients with hyper-IgE syndrome.
Numb e r 5
375
nt
l
Pa
43%
56%
1%
0%
CD4
Co
tie
ro
nt
tie
Pa
Co
nt
ro
nt
The Ne w E n g l a nd Jo u r n a l o f Me d ic i ne
11 kb
8.5 kb
6.5 kb
Interleukin-4
6%
52%
3.6 kb
CD4
4 kb
6%
36%
EcoRI
HindIII
Interferon-g
Figure 1. Southern Blot Analysis of T-CellReceptor b Genes (Panel A) and Flow-Cytometric Analysis of Intracellular
Cytokine Expression by CD4+ T Cells (Panel B).
In Southern blot analysis, DNA from control cells (K-562) and the patients peripheral-blood mononuclear cells were
digested with the EcoRI and HindIII restriction enzymes and studied with a T-cellreceptor bJ/bC probe.
To the Editor: Grimbacher et al. describe what they consider the characteristic facial appearance of patients with
the hyper-IgE syndrome. For years, dysmorphologists and
geneticists have debated and pondered what constitutes a
characteristic facial appearance. Twenty-five years ago a
colleague and I reported normal values for selected facial
features,1 and more reports were subsequently published.2-4 These data are available but are frequently not
used. Grimbacher et al. substantiated their clinical impression of increased interalar distances by comparing their
measurements with published standard values, but the majority of the other facial characteristics mentioned were
not documented.
An increasing array of newer techniques that can provide anthropometric measurements are now available, such
as magnetic resonance imaging, stereoscopic imaging,
computed tomography, and ultrasonography. It is not always practical to use these methods in clinical practice;
however, if findings are to be published, these techniques
can help substantiate an authors impression of a characteristic facial appearance. Granted, not all facial features
can be adequately measured.
I also want to stress the importance of the clinicians
ability to diagnose what we used to term a facial gestalt
that is, a pattern of clinically observed, physical facial
findings that is derived from the sum of its parts and that
376
Jul y 2 9 , 19 9 9
The New England Journal of Medicine
Downloaded from nejm.org on November 1, 2015. For personal use only. No other uses without permission.
Copyright 1999 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.
skin abscesses, pneumonia with formation of pneumatoceles, and recurrent eczematoid rashes, as well as extreme
elevations in serum IgE levels. The woman described by
Presotto et al. may have hyper-IgE syndrome, although
from the limited information given and in the absence of
boils or pneumatoceles, she would not meet our criteria
for an affected proband, nor would a brother with isolated
IgE elevation be considered to have a hyper-IgE genotype.
Moreover, it is not clear whether this womans clonal
T cells or CD4+ cells producing interleukin-4 and interferon-g, described at a single point in time, would be continuously present. The specific primary immunologic defect in the hyper-IgE syndrome has remained elusive,
despite more than 30 years of immunologic investigations.
A wide array of lymphocyte abnormalities and cytokines
has been noted, but these findings have not been present
in all patients or at all times. For this reason, we have elected to pursue a genetic-linkage strategy; identification of a
gene that, when mutated, results in hyper-IgE syndrome
may be the most efficient way to understand the syndromes primary cause.
Feingold stresses the importance of anthropometric
measurements in the definition of syndromic phenotypes.
We performed a series of external measurements of the
body, head, and face, including height, weight, arm span,
head circumference, inner and outer canthal distances, interpupillary distance, interalar distance, and lengths of
the nose, philtrum, ears, hands, palms, and feet. These
were compared with population standards and are available on request. For brevity, we reported only the measurements for which the values for our patients with hyperIgE syndrome differed from population means: interalar
distance and head circumference. We did not confirm the
increased outer canthal distance reported for such patients
by Borges et al.1 Further measurements, such as quantitation of asymmetry by methods requiring exposure to radiation, sedation of young children, or substantial expense,
were not undertaken in this study in part because the facial gestalt assessment was so highly reproducible by independent observers who viewed our subjects.
BODO GRIMBACHER, M.D.
National Human Genome Research Institute
To the Editor: As clinicians who care for many lowincome immigrants, we doubt that our patients would follow the recommendation of Muennig et al. to take a medication as prophylaxis against conditions (disseminated
strongyloidiasis and ascariasis) for which the lifetime chance
of death is less than 1/5 of 1 percent. This is especially
true because many immigrants who have recently arrived
in the United States do not have health insurance, and most
are not eligible for Medicaid. Financial factors adversely
affect health status and access to care among low-income
immigrants. Would a low-income family of five asymptomatic immigrants opt to pay $58.95 for albendazole (the
retail cost for five persons treated with 400 mg of albendazole per day, given orally for five days, at the Boston Medical Centers outpatient pharmacy) because we say empirical treatment will save society a few million dollars and
prevent 33 deaths nationally each year? We think not.
A better focus for the study would have been the provision of empirical antiparasitic treatment to immigrants
with high-risk medical conditions (such as asthma or
autoimmune disease) just before their departure from
Numb e r 5
377
The Ne w E n g l a nd Jo u r n a l o f Me d ic i ne
378
toy flashlight (2.5 cm in diameter) emblazoned with a cartoon character (Fig. 1). The boys symptoms were relieved
after the flashlight was removed, and his flashlight still
worked.
TOBIAS G. WENZL, M.D.
HEINO SKOPNIK, M.D.
Childrens Hospital Worms
D-67550 Worms, Germany
1999, Massachusetts Medical Society.
Jul y 2 9 , 19 9 9
The New England Journal of Medicine
Downloaded from nejm.org on November 1, 2015. For personal use only. No other uses without permission.
Copyright 1999 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.