Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Since I am not quite ready yet to send you the Book (or e-book)
itself, I figured Id send you a samplean idea of what the Book is
supposed to be about, in case youd need that so you can have an
idea of what type of cover I might need.
In doing so, I have asked myself a few questions that I think might
help making the book, or the view of the book, quite clear.
I will intend to answer simple questions like:
What is the Book about?
Whats the purpose of the Book?
What type of Book is it?
Matter of fact, I have generated a set of questions regarding what
to talk about and what would be of most importance in this
sample. The answers to these questions will be explored here
now.
Firstly, let me say that the book is about allowing oneself to
experience a different aspect of Reality. It provides, for the most
part, a unique view of Reality that is mostly weird with a sense of
the bizarre.
If there is one thing that I have learned, its the fact that
everybody experiences Reality based on a particular Model.
Everybody has a Model of Reality. That Model can be scientific,
mystic, or magicaleven supernatural, to a certain extent. The
fact is, there is always a Model. Therefore, the primary purpose of
this Book is to break that Model.
Due to a recent conversations I have had with my DNA (not the
Bio-chemical DNA, but the Linguistic DNA we all have), I figured
that everyone has a Model through which they look at the world.
It has also come to my attention that this Model---whatever it may
The entirety of this book is based on some kind of TechnoLinguistic approach to reality. That Techno-Linguistic approach
makes the weird quite normal.
I mean, we do have syntactic errors, for sure. Even a complex
system as such as Reality may have syntactic errors. Of course,
there is the question of whether these so-called syntactic errors
can really be regarded as such, or is it just part of the
programming?
Oh yesthere is also the idea of a Global Operator Designer, as
presented in the CTMU. Could it be that the SCSPL (SelfConfiguring, Self-Processing Language) is the same as that which
referred to as The Logos?
It could be that everything is possible on a syntactic level,
couldnt it?