Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Assignment 1
Distribution System Load
Characteristics
1-a)Average Power=
Average demand
LD
Peak demand
1141
=
=0.326
3500
2-a) Transformer kW=
1800+2000+2000
1.15
To Calculate Transformer S, calculate Q
=5043.48 kW
-1
Q1 +Q2 +Q3
1.15
2
=2434.578 kVAR
2
ECE6606PD
Assignment # 2
Distribution System Load Forecasting
1. Explain briefly the main difference between the extrapolation, the simulation, and the econometric
methods for load forecast. Your answer should address the following:
a. Their use for distribution system load forecast.
b. The data requirements.
c. The accuracy of their results.
[30 marks]
Lecture 2, Section 4
2. For the demand data given in Table 1, forecast the nearest three future points and calculate the MAE
the RMSE over the historical data points sets using the following forecasting techniques:
a. 4-order weighted moving average (WMA)
b. ARIMA (2,0,0)
[70 marks]
Table 1 Hourly demand data variation
Hour
Power (kW)
Hour
Power (kW)
Hour
Power (kW)
Hour
Power (kW)
1
28969.26
7
22187.94
13
29886.12
19
37448.58
2
26392.32
8
22463.73
14
30487.05
20
36800.67
3
24254.58
9
22850.31
15
30160.56
21
35871.45
4
22707.33
10
24301.62
16
30874.11
22
34722.09
5
21787.5
11
26440.89
17
33837.27
23
32497.41
6
21642.96
12
28536.93
18
37946.61
24
28453.05
Solution:
i) 4-order weighted moving average (WMA)
The mathematical expression for the 4-order moving average model can be re-written as
follows
4
Y i
Wm Y i m W1 Y i 1W2 Y i 2W3 Y i
3W4 Y i 4
m1
i 4
The chosen weights are 0.4, 0.3, 0.2, and 0.1, respectively.
Table 2 and Fig. 1 present the generated results when using the 4-order weighted moving
average. These results reveal that the MAE is 2314.41 kW and the RMSE is 2848.89 kW.
Table 2 Load forecasting using 4-order weighted moving average
Hour (i)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Actual
28969.26
26392.32
24254.58
22707.33
21787.5
21642.96
22187.94
22463.73
22850.31
24301.62
26440.89
28536.93
29886.12
30487.05
30160.56
30874.11
33837.27
37946.61
37448.58
36800.67
35871.45
34722.09
32497.41
28453.05
28453.05
28453.05
Power (kW)
Forecasted
24534.696
23017.347
22160.358
21996.297
22149.216
22481.127
23287.281
24683.277
26492.394
28233.867
29512.131
30041.256
30483.834
31877.958
34520.703
36218.28
36927.891
36673.158
35755.263
34269.948
31662.006
29888.826
28857.486
e(i)
2747.20
1374.39
27.58
467.43
701.09
1820.49
3153.61
3853.65
3393.73
2253.18
648.43
832.85
3353.44
6068.65
2927.88
582.39
1056.44
1951.07
3257.85
5816.90
{e(i)}^2
7547085.86
1888939.63
760.77
218493.61
491532.80
3314194.76
9945249.72
14850641.44
11517376.16
5076833.63
420460.17
693645.79
11245533.01
36828537.10
8572463.73
339178.11
1116067.59
3806666.34
10613606.17
33836302.34
40
35
30
D
e 25
m
20
an
d 15
(
10
5
0
1
9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
Time Intervals (hours)
Actual
Forecasted
ii) ARIMA
(2,0,0)
The
mathematically
by,
i 3, 4, 5,......
i 2
where a , b ,
1
and
is expressed
b2 represent the model coefficients that can be estimated using the Least
Y
Y 1
2
Y 2
1
1
1 Y (n
1)
Y (n 2)
Y 3
Y 4
Y
A b1
1.726
b2
- 0.8318
Table 3 and Fig. 2 present the generated results when using the ARIMA (2,0,0). These results
reveal that the MAE is 796.71 kW and the RMSE is 1134.88 kW.
45
40
35
D
e
m
an
d
(
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
1
9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
Time Intervals (hours)
Actual
Forecasted
Actual
28969.26
26392.32
24254.58
22707.33
21787.5
21642.96
22187.94
22463.73
22850.31
24301.62
26440.89
28536.93
29886.12
30487.05
30160.56
30874.11
33837.27
37946.61
37448.58
36800.67
35871.45
34722.09
32497.41
28453.05
28453.05
28453.05
Power (kW)
Forecasted
24466
22920
22028
21727
22243
23303
23326
23764
25947
28433
30271
30856
30771
29708
31211
35732
40360
36082
35378
34313
33102
30218
25088
28452
28452
e(i)
211.42
212.67
240.50
84.04
55.06
839.27
475.69
537.62
493.89
103.93
384.88
368.95
610.44
1166.11
2626.27
2214.61
2911.42
718.67
493.45
409.09
604.59
1764.95
{e(i)}^2
44698.42
45228.53
57840.25
7062.72
3031.60
704374.13
226280.98
289035.26
243927.33
10801.44
148132.61
136124.10
372636.99
1359812.53
6897294.11
4904497.45
8476366.42
516486.57
243492.90
167354.63
365529.07
3115048.50
Assignment 3
Distribution System
Planning
Q1) Lecture 3, Sections 1, 3 and 4
Q2) it is required to calculate the cost function between different
sections
Shortest
distance
from1
(41)
2
(412)
5
(478963)
0
1
(45)
4
(47896)
1
(47)
2
(478)
3
(4789)
Shortest
distance
from4
(98741)
3
(9852)
2
(963)
3
(9874)
2
(985)
1
(96)
2
(987)
1
(98)
0
Closest substation
SS1
SS1
SS2
SS1
SS1
SS2
SS1
SS2
SS2
Cost function
1
2
2
0
1
1
1
1
0
SS1
12457
14 MVA
SS2
3689
20 MVA
ECE6606PD
Assignment # 4 Solution
Distribution System Automation &
Demand Side Management
1. Discuss the main factors influencing efficient and reliable load supply to customers.
Lecture 4, Section 1
[30 marks]
2. Explain briefly the main basic areas required to be developed in order to implement distribution
system automation.
Lecture 4, Section 6
[30 marks]
3. Discuss the different requirements of successful load management and its possible impacts
Lecture 4, Section 8
[40 marks]
Assignment # 5 Solution
Sub-Transmission Lines and Non-Technical
Distribution Substations Design Factors
1. Discuss briefly the different types of sub-transmission circuits configurations. Your answer should
address the following:
a. The one line diagram of the electric circuit.
b. The reliability of the configuration.
c. The relative cost of each configuration.
d. The main drawbacks of each configuration.
Lecture 5, Section 2.1
2. Discuss briefly how the most optimal substation locations (sites) are determined and the different
factors affecting the selection process.
Lecture 5, Section 4
Assignment # 6 Solution
Distribution Substation Design
Aspects
1. Discuss briefly the different types of substation bus configurations. Your answer should address the
following:
a. The one line diagram of the electric circuit.
b. The possible operating voltages for each configuration.
c. The main drawbacks of each configuration.
d. The main advantages of each configuration
Lecture 6, Section 3
2. A distribution substation services a square area with the substation at the center of the square.
Assume that the substation is served by four three phase four wire 13.2/22.9 KV grounded-wye
primary feeders. The feeder mains are made of either #2 AWG copper or #1/0 ACSR
conductors. The three phase open wire overhead lines have a geometric mean spacing of 37 in
2
between phase conductors. Assume a lagging-load power factor of 0.9 and a 1000 KVA/mi
uniformly distributed load density.
From tables, the conductor ampacity for #2 AWG copper is 230A.
(a) Consider thermally loaded feeder mains:
Since, the thermally limited case is considered, therefore, the feeder conductor is equal to
its current carrying capacity, i.e. I = Imax = 230 A.
(i) Maximum load per feeder.
S feeder 3 x
VLL
3
x I max
x 22.9 x 230
9122.7 KVA
(ii) Substation size.
Ssubstation 4 x S feeder
4 x 9122.57
36490.8 KVA
9122.7 l x 1000
4
l 4 3.02 mi
Substation Spacing, both Ways 2 l4 6.04 mi
(iv) Total percent voltage drop from the feed point to the end of the main.
From Fig. 1, k for #2 AWG copper at 22.9 kV is 0.00025
2
3
x k x D x l
%VD
4
23
(b) Consider voltage drop-limited feeders which have 3% voltage drop and find:
(i) Substation spacing, both ways.
2
%VD
3
x k x D x l
4
23
x 0.00025 x 1000 x l
l4
3
2.621 mi
3
4
S feeder
3 x VLL
36869.941
x 22.9
173.196 A
I pu
max
173.19 0.753
6
230
Fig. 1 K constant curves for copper conductors with 0.9 lagging power factor
Assignment 7
lateral
From Figure 2, The K factor for the main = 0.0004 and
for the lateral = 0.001
-
ECE6606PD
Assignment # 8 Solution
Secondary Distribution Systems Design, Services
and Metering
1. Explain briefly the different secondary distribution system configurations. Your answer should
address the following:
a. The single line diagram of each configuration.
b. The main advantage of each configuration.
c. The disadvantages of each configuration.
d. The degree of reliability of each configuration.
Lecture 8, Section 1.2
2. Discuss the main components of the secondary distribution system. Your answer should consider the
following issues:
a. The secondary system voltage level.
b. The design consideration of the secondary system.
c. The degree of reliability of each component in the secondary system.
Lecture 8, Section 1.1
Assignment # 9 Solution
Voltage Drops and Power Loss
Calculations
2
1. Figure #1 shows a square-shaped service area (A = 4 mi ) with a uniformly distributed load density
2
of D kVA/mi and 2 mi of #4/0 AWG copper overhead main from a to b. There are many closely
spaced primary laterals, which are not shown in the square-shaped service area of the figure.
In this voltage-drop study, use the precalculated voltage-drop curves of Figure #2 when applicable.
Use the nominal primary voltage of 19,920/34,500 V for a three-phase four-wire wye-grounded
2
system. Assume that at peak loading the load density is 1000 kVA/mi and the lumped load is 2000
2
kVA, and that at off-peak loading the load density is 333 kVA/mi and the lumped load is still
2000 kVA, The lumped load is of a small industrial plant working three shifts a day. The substation
bus voltages are 1.025 pu V of 19,920 base volts at peak load and 1.000 pu V during off-peak load.
The transformer located between buses c and d has a three-phase rating of 2000 kVA and a deltarated high voltage of 34,500 V and grounded-wye- rated low voltage of 277/480 V. It has 0 + j0.05
per unit impedance based on the transformer ratings. It is tapped up to raise the low voltage 5.0
percent relative to the high voltage, i.e., the equivalent turns ratio in use is (19,920/277) x 0.95. Use
the given information and data for peak loading and determine the following:
a- The percent voltage drop from the substation to point a, from a to b, from b to c, and from c
to d on the main.
b- The per unit voltages at the points a, b, c, and d on the main.
c- The line-to-neutral voltages at the points a, b, c, and d.
%VDAB = (K x Ssquare
x
) + (K x Slumped x l)
Slumped
3 x VC ,LL
2000 kVA
3 x 1.009 x 34.5 kV
Ibase
3 x VC ,LL
33.17 A
2000 kVA
33.47 A
3 x 34.5
kV
I (R cos X sin
Vbase
0.05
0.0
5
= -2.84 % .
b- The per unit values for the voltages at buses A, B, C, and D on the main:
VA = V0 V0A = 1.025 0.004 = 1.021 pu
VB = VA VAB = 1.021 0.0052 = 1.0158 pu
B
pu
VD = VC VCD = 1.009 (-0.0284) = 1.0374 pu
c- The line-to-neutral voltages at buses A, B, C, and D on the main:
VA = 19,920 x 1.021 = 20,338.32 V
VB = 19,920 x 1.0158 = 20,234.73 V
B
and
Figure # 4, Question #2
j 1.8V1 199.332 j 153.459
V1 112.5 j 54.49x 0.9
Subtract the last two equations from each other, the voltage difference between substations
2 and 3 (V23) can be found as
V23 V2 V3 199.332 j 153.459 268.47 j 63.0369.138 j 90.429
113.8 52.6 V
Figure # 5, Question #2
ECE6606PD
and
and
I 2 165.75 j
102.72 I 3
x Z13 I x Z 23 0
3
Therefore,
I3
0.9
j 1
j 1.8 1 j 1 1 j 2
ECE6606PD
3 x I
x r12
x
r13 I 3
x 0.9
3 x
128.16
x1
192.4
156.64 kW
20.3
x1
Assignment 10
as:
P
hp)
(400 hp)(0.7457 kW /
350.92 kW
0.85
tan
1
Q P
tan
Qc Q1
Q2
X c,
phase
2
phase
Qc, phase
2 fC
C
Where
Qc, phase
2 f
V
2
phase
120.07
k var
c
c, phase
Figure 1
Substituti
ng
120.07 1000
C 3250 41602 7.36F
c) In this case, Vphase will be equal to (4160/sqrt(3))
as shown in Figure 2
Figure 2
Substituti
ng
120.07 1000
4160 2 22.09F
3260 (
)
3
Assignment 11
Distribution System Voltage
Regulation
1) (30 marks) Voltage regulators are used to improve the
Solution
For the original load (4000 kVA at 80 % lagging power factor),
1
kVA
Pn
Po
So
pfo
Howeve Sn
r
pfn
Pn
Sn 3636.364 kVA
Then, it is required to find the old and new reactive powers
) (P )
(S
o
2
) (P )
(S
2400 kVAR
40002 32002
3636.362 32002 1727.17 kVAR
Qc Qo
Qn
X
X
tr
tr
tr
(base) 0.05
( pu)
X
3 2
(12.810 )
5000 10
1.6384
VR( pu)
Q X L
1000 (kVB,LL )
750 (0.8
3 1.6384)
2
pu
0.018486
1000 (12.8)
VR( pu)
Q
900 (0.8 3 1.6384)
2
X L
0.0222 pu
1000 (12.8)
2
1000 (kVB,LL
)
Assignment 12
Distribution Service
Reliability
1) (50 marks) Improvement of electric power delivery
Notes
-