Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
MACROECONOMICS
N. Gregory Mankiw
Context
! Chapter 10 introduced the model of aggregate
demand and supply.
CHAPTER 12
Aggregate Demand II
r
LM
r1
IS
Y1
The intersection determines
the unique combination of Y and r
that satisfies equilibrium in both markets.
CHAPTER 12
Aggregate Demand II
CHAPTER 12
Aggregate Demand II
IS
Y1
r
LM
2.
CHAPTER 12
Aggregate Demand II
r2
r1
1.
IS2
IS1
Y1 Y2
3.
A tax cut
Consumers save (1MPC)
r
of the tax cut, so the initial
boost in spending is
smaller for T than for an
r2
equal G
2.
r1
and the IS curve shifts by
LM
1.
1.
IS1
2. so the effects on r
and Y are smaller for T
than for an equal G.
CHAPTER 12
IS2
Aggregate Demand II
Y1 Y2
2.
Aggregate Demand II
LM1
LM2
r1
r2
IS
Y1 Y2
Interaction between
monetary & fiscal policy
! Model:
! Monetary & fiscal policy variables
(M, G, and T ) are exogenous.
! Real world:
! Monetary policymakers may adjust M
CHAPTER 12
Aggregate Demand II
CHAPTER 12
Aggregate Demand II
r
LM1
r2
r1
IS2
IS1
Results:
Y1 Y2
CHAPTER 12
Aggregate Demand II
r
LM1
r2
r1
IS2
IS1
Results:
Y1 Y2 Y3
CHAPTER 12
Aggregate Demand II
LM2
LM2
LM1
r
r3
r2
r1
IS2
IS1
Results:
Y1 Y2
CHAPTER 12
Aggregate Demand II
Assumption about
monetary policy
Estimated
value of
Y / G
Estimated
value of
Y / T
0.60
0.26
1.93
1.19
CHAPTER 12
Aggregate Demand II
Aggregate Demand II
CHAPTER 12
Aggregate Demand II
ANSWERS, PART 1
r
LM1
r1
r2
IS2
Y2 Y1
IS1
Y
18
ANSWERS, PART 2
LM2
LM1
r2
r1
IS1
Y2 Y1
19
CASE STUDY:
CHAPTER 12
Aggregate Demand II
CASE STUDY:
1,200
900
600
300
1995
CHAPTER 12
1996
1997
1998
Aggregate Demand II
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
CASE STUDY:
CHAPTER 12
Aggregate Demand II
CASE STUDY:
CHAPTER 12
Aggregate Demand II
CASE STUDY:
Three-month
T-Bill rate
5
4
3
2
1
CHAPTER 12
Aggregate Demand II
03
/20
03
04
/11
/20
02
01
/09
/20
02
10
/09
/20
02
07
/09
/20
02
04
/08
/20
01
01
/06
/20
01
10
/06
/20
01
07
/06
/20
01
04
/05
/20
00
01
/03
/20
00
10
/03
/20
00
07
/03
/20
/02
04
01
/01
/20
00
CHAPTER 12
Aggregate Demand II
CHAPTER 12
Aggregate Demand II
CHAPTER 12
Aggregate Demand II
LM shifts left
LM(P2)
LM(P1)
r2
r1
IS
P
Y2
Aggregate Demand II
P2
P1
AD
Y2
CHAPTER 12
Y1
Y1
LM(M1/P1)
LM(M2/P1)
r1
r2
IS
Y at each
P1
value of
Y1
Y2
Y2
AD2
AD1
Y
P
Y1
CHAPTER 12
Aggregate Demand II
LM
r2
r1
IS2
T C
IS1
IS shifts right
Y at each
value
Y1
Y2
Y2
AD2
AD1
Y
P1
of P
Y1
CHAPTER 12
Aggregate Demand II
CHAPTER 12
Aggregate Demand II
A negative IS shock
shifts IS and AD left,
causing Y to fall.
LRAS LM(P )
1
IS2
IS1
Y
P
P1
LRAS
SRAS1
AD1
AD2
Y
CHAPTER 12
Aggregate Demand II
LRAS LM(P )
1
IS1
Y
P
P1
LRAS
SRAS1
AD1
AD2
Y
CHAPTER 12
Aggregate Demand II
LRAS LM(P )
1
Aggregate Demand II
IS1
Y
P
P1
LRAS
SRAS1
AD1
AD2
Y
LRAS LM(P )
1
LM(P2)
IS2
Aggregate Demand II
IS1
Y
LRAS
P1
SRAS1
P2
SRAS2
AD1
AD2
Y
LRAS LM(P )
1
LM(P2)
IS2
IS1
Y
LRAS
P1
SRAS1
P2
SRAS2
AD1
AD2
Y
CHAPTER 12
Aggregate Demand II
LRAS LM(M /P )
1
1
IS
Y
P
P1
LRAS
SRAS1
AD1
Y
37
ANSWERS, PART 1
Short-run effects of M
LM and AD shift right.
r falls, Y rises above
LRAS LM(M /P )
1
1
LM(M2/P1)
r1
r2
IS
Y2
P
P1
LRAS
SRAS
AD2
AD1
Y2 Y
38
ANSWERS, PART 2
LRAS LM(M /P )
1
1
2
3
LM(M2/P1)
r3 = r1
r2
IS
Y2
P
P3
! P higher
P1
! all real variables back at
their initial values
Money is neutral in the long run.
LRAS
SRAS
SRAS
AD2
AD1
Y2 Y
39
220
30
25
200
20
180
15
160
10
Real GNP
(left scale)
140
120
1929
5
0
1931
1933
1935
1937
1939
240
UNTABLE 12.1
Mankiw: Macroeconomics, Eighth Edition
Copyright 2012 by Worth Publishers
! Evidence:
CHAPTER 12
Aggregate Demand II
! Drop in investment
! Correction after overbuilding in the 1920s.
! Widespread bank failures made it harder to obtain
financing for investment.
CHAPTER 12
Aggregate Demand II
! Evidence:
during 192931.
! nominal interest rates fell, which is the opposite
of what a leftward LM shift would cause.
CHAPTER 12
Aggregate Demand II
CHAPTER 12
Aggregate Demand II
(M/P )
$ $
consumers wealth
$ $
$ $
IS shifts right
$ $
CHAPTER 12
Aggregate Demand II
I because I = I (r )
CHAPTER 12
Aggregate Demand II
Aggregate Demand II
CHAPTER 12
Aggregate Demand II
CASE STUDY
CHAPTER 12
Aggregate Demand II
170
7
6
150
130
110
3
90
70
1
0
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
50
2005
1.4
10%
1.2
8%
1.0
6%
0.8
4%
2%
0.6
0%
0.4
-2%
0.2
-4%
-6%
1999
0.0
2001
2003
2005
2007
2009
12%
New foreclosures,
% of all mortgages
Nevada
Florida
Illinois
Michigan
Ohio
California
Georgia
Colorado
Arizona
Rhode Island
New Jersey
Texas
S. Dakota
Hawaii
Oregon
Alaska
Wyoming
N. Dakota
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
-80%
S&P 500
100%
NASDAQ
7/20/2009
120%
11/11/2008
140%
3/5/2008
6/28/2007
10/20/2006
2/11/2006
6/5/2005
9/27/2004
1/20/2004
5/14/2003
9/5/2002
12/28/2001
4/21/2001
8/13/2000
12/6/1999
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
-20%
-40%
-60%
15%
10%
100
5%
90
0%
80
-5%
-10%
70
-15%
Durables
-20%
Investment
60
50
20%
10
6
6
4
2
0
-2
-4
-6
1995
1997
1999
2001
2003
2005
2007
2009
0
2011
% of labor force
12
CHAPTER SUMMARY
1. IS-LM model
57
CHAPTER SUMMARY
2. AD curve
58